• How does a photon absorb

    From mitchrae3323@gmail.com@21:1/5 to All on Sun Sep 3 20:28:44 2023
    if light is a standing wave?

    Mitchell Raemsch

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From J. J. Lodder@21:1/5 to mitchr...@gmail.com on Mon Sep 4 10:05:57 2023
    mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> wrote:

    if light is a standing wave?

    A photon being a quantum of light
    does not depend on the light being a standing
    or a travelling wave.
    In fact most textbooks start with photons as quanta
    of the normal modes of light in a box,

    Jan

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From mitchrae3323@gmail.com@21:1/5 to J. J. Lodder on Mon Sep 4 09:30:42 2023
    On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 1:06:00 AM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote:
    mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchr...@gmail.com> wrote:

    if light is a standing wave?
    A photon being a quantum of light
    does not depend on the light being a standing
    or a travelling wave.
    In fact most textbooks start with photons as quanta
    of the normal modes of light in a box,

    Jan

    How does a point particle absorb another point particle jan?
    if they are both quantized at the infinitely small.
    What guides light point particle together with an electron
    How does a standing wave absorb?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ross Finlayson@21:1/5 to J. J. Lodder on Mon Sep 4 12:23:28 2023
    On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 1:06:00 AM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote:
    mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchr...@gmail.com> wrote:

    if light is a standing wave?
    A photon being a quantum of light
    does not depend on the light being a standing
    or a travelling wave.
    In fact most textbooks start with photons as quanta
    of the normal modes of light in a box,

    Jan

    Here it starts with additive and subtractive color.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ross Finlayson@21:1/5 to Ross Finlayson on Mon Sep 4 12:27:44 2023
    On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 12:23:31 PM UTC-7, Ross Finlayson wrote:
    On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 1:06:00 AM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote:
    mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchr...@gmail.com> wrote:

    if light is a standing wave?
    A photon being a quantum of light
    does not depend on the light being a standing
    or a travelling wave.
    In fact most textbooks start with photons as quanta
    of the normal modes of light in a box,

    Jan
    Here it starts with additive and subtractive color.


    Then there's often a usual course in perspective drawing, and for example drawing marks
    of brightness and shadow.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ross Finlayson@21:1/5 to Ross Finlayson on Mon Sep 4 13:30:48 2023
    On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 12:27:47 PM UTC-7, Ross Finlayson wrote:
    On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 12:23:31 PM UTC-7, Ross Finlayson wrote:
    On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 1:06:00 AM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote:
    mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchr...@gmail.com> wrote:

    if light is a standing wave?
    A photon being a quantum of light
    does not depend on the light being a standing
    or a travelling wave.
    In fact most textbooks start with photons as quanta
    of the normal modes of light in a box,

    Jan
    Here it starts with additive and subtractive color.
    Then there's often a usual course in perspective drawing, and for example drawing marks
    of brightness and shadow.


    Yeah, by the time students and researchers arrive at the "wavepacket formalism",
    in the "photon sector", it's figured they have a wide and broad knowledge and experience
    in what contributes to appreciation of the geometrical, and, the optical, qualities of
    light, and, about images, focuses, reflections, and shade.

    One hopes it's a wide and broad knowledge and experience,
    not a fat and soft the gut, the butt, the heart, and the head.

    Now, if you're a few lines of code, with a few segments of memory, with a few instructions
    as so follow, or the guts of an algorithm of a digital calculator, then there's much to be said
    for the limited instruction set which arrives at the purpose and function of a digital calculator.
    Is it really so much more to arrive at that of an analytical framework of knowledge and experience
    overall? It's quite some more, but, not necessarily so much more.

    One of my favorite books of Carl Boyer even more than "the conceptual development of
    the calculus" a history and treatise on the infinitesimal analysis also known as real analysis,
    is his history of the science of "the rainbow". Now, this book about rainbows isn't about
    the gays, or Irish leprechauns, or Norse bridge, it's about the phenomenon in optics and state
    of the natural result of "events" which arrive at the study and research of the nature of the
    principles and laws that in the emergent result in a study and a research into the theory and
    science, of the rainbow, or arc en ciel.

    Then, getting into the theory of light, and while the thread stub says photons there's that
    photons are just a quantum object with frequency and wavelength in part of a context of
    a theory of the properties of the qualia of natural phenomenon toward a quantitative science
    of same, there's an overall _context_ what's so relevant to any given laden or unladen photon.
    (What results the irradiative generally and imaging towrad information in coherence.)

    So, a textbook of a calculator's innards yes might be just a few terms and a few rules and
    summary inputs and outputs. But, it doesn't "think" that.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From J. J. Lodder@21:1/5 to mitchr...@gmail.com on Tue Sep 5 11:02:54 2023
    mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 1:06:00?AM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote:
    mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchr...@gmail.com> wrote:

    if light is a standing wave?
    A photon being a quantum of light
    does not depend on the light being a standing
    or a travelling wave.
    In fact most textbooks start with photons as quanta
    of the normal modes of light in a box,

    Jan

    How does a point particle absorb another point particle jan?
    if they are both quantized at the infinitely small.
    What guides light point particle together with an electron
    How does a standing wave absorb?
    w
    Particles are not quantised in the infinitely small. e
    It is done in a finite box, which is then generalised
    to an infinite box.
    To confuse you further: e
    monochromatic photons need an infinitely large space
    to be point particles in,

    Jan

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Maciej Wozniak@21:1/5 to J. J. Lodder on Tue Sep 5 02:11:20 2023
    On Tuesday, 5 September 2023 at 11:02:58 UTC+2, J. J. Lodder wrote:
    mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchr...@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 1:06:00?AM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote:
    mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchr...@gmail.com> wrote:

    if light is a standing wave?
    A photon being a quantum of light
    does not depend on the light being a standing
    or a travelling wave.
    In fact most textbooks start with photons as quanta
    of the normal modes of light in a box,

    Jan

    How does a point particle absorb another point particle jan?
    if they are both quantized at the infinitely small.
    What guides light point particle together with an electron
    How does a standing wave absorb?
    w
    Particles are not quantised in the infinitely small. e
    It is done in a finite box, which is then generalised
    to an infinite box.
    To confuse you further: e
    monochromatic photons need an infinitely large space
    to be point particles in,

    Twas brillig, and the slithy toves
    Did gyre and gimble in the wabe:
    All mimsy were the borogoves,
    And the mome raths outgrabe.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ross Finlayson@21:1/5 to J. J. Lodder on Tue Sep 5 03:43:32 2023
    On Tuesday, September 5, 2023 at 2:02:58 AM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote:
    mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchr...@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 1:06:00?AM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote:
    mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchr...@gmail.com> wrote:

    if light is a standing wave?
    A photon being a quantum of light
    does not depend on the light being a standing
    or a travelling wave.
    In fact most textbooks start with photons as quanta
    of the normal modes of light in a box,

    Jan

    How does a point particle absorb another point particle jan?
    if they are both quantized at the infinitely small.
    What guides light point particle together with an electron
    How does a standing wave absorb?
    w
    Particles are not quantised in the infinitely small. e
    It is done in a finite box, which is then generalised
    to an infinite box.
    To confuse you further: e
    monochromatic photons need an infinitely large space
    to be point particles in,

    Jan

    "Technicolour"

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From mitchrae3323@gmail.com@21:1/5 to Ross Finlayson on Tue Sep 5 10:34:56 2023
    On Tuesday, September 5, 2023 at 3:43:34 AM UTC-7, Ross Finlayson wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 5, 2023 at 2:02:58 AM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote:
    mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchr...@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 1:06:00?AM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote:
    mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchr...@gmail.com> wrote:

    if light is a standing wave?
    A photon being a quantum of light
    does not depend on the light being a standing
    or a travelling wave.
    In fact most textbooks start with photons as quanta
    of the normal modes of light in a box,

    Jan

    How does a point particle absorb another point particle jan?
    if they are both quantized at the infinitely small.
    What guides light point particle together with an electron
    How does a standing wave absorb?
    w
    Particles are not quantised in the infinitely small. e
    It is done in a finite box, which is then generalised
    to an infinite box.
    To confuse you further: e
    monochromatic photons need an infinitely large space
    to be point particles in,

    In the first integer There is an infinity of the infinitely small.


    Jan
    "Technicolour"

    How can the infinitely small absorb a particle?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)