It can correctly model Sagnac, Filipas Fox,
Ives Stillwell etc etc etc.
On Sunday, September 3, 2023 at 2:57:27 AM UTC-7, Lou wrote:
It can correctly model Sagnac, Filipas Fox,No , it doesn't. Stop lying
Ives Stillwell etc etc etc.
On Sunday, September 3, 2023 at 2:57:27 AM UTC-7, Lou wrote:
It can correctly model Sagnac, Filipas Fox,No , it doesn't. Stop lying
Ives Stillwell etc etc etc.
On Sunday, 3 September 2023 at 14:40:46 UTC+1, Dono. wrote:
On Sunday, September 3, 2023 at 2:57:27 AM UTC-7, Lou wrote:
(Whoops. I’ll try again and repost with correct MHz hopefully)It can correctly model Sagnac, Filipas Fox,No , it doesn't. Stop lying
Ives Stillwell etc etc etc.
Ives Stillwell has the original rest frame line at 486.1nm. They admit that a
red or blueshifted line will result if the source moves at c+-v.
On Sunday, September 3, 2023 at 5:03:20 PM UTC-7, Lou wrote:
On Sunday, 3 September 2023 at 14:40:46 UTC+1, Dono. wrote:
On Sunday, September 3, 2023 at 2:57:27 AM UTC-7, Lou wrote:
(Whoops. I’ll try again and repost with correct MHz hopefully)It can correctly model Sagnac, Filipas Fox,No , it doesn't. Stop lying
Ives Stillwell etc etc etc.
Ives Stillwell has the original rest frame line at 486.1nm. They admit that a"The source moves at c+v ????!!!!"
red or blueshifted line will result if the source moves at c+-v.
You have gone off the deepest end , crank. Ives never "admits" to such imbecility, it is your own imbecility.
On Monday, 4 September 2023 at 06:04:37 UTC+1, Dono. wrote:
On Sunday, September 3, 2023 at 5:03:20 PM UTC-7, Lou wrote:
On Sunday, 3 September 2023 at 14:40:46 UTC+1, Dono. wrote:
On Sunday, September 3, 2023 at 2:57:27 AM UTC-7, Lou wrote:
(Whoops. I’ll try again and repost with correct MHz hopefully)It can correctly model Sagnac, Filipas Fox,No , it doesn't. Stop lying
Ives Stillwell etc etc etc.
Ives Stillwell has the original rest frame line at 486.1nm. They admit that a"The source moves at c+v ????!!!!"
red or blueshifted line will result if the source moves at c+-v.
You have gone off the deepest end , crank. Ives never "admits" to such imbecility, it is your own imbecility.Good try Bob. You got out of having to admit Ives Stillwell
faked the calculation for a classical model.
Average of the c+-v is 486.111nm
Which gives a correct predicted offset of 0.11A for a classical model.
Ives Stillwell 1941 experiment observed an offset of 0.11A
On Wednesday, September 6, 2023 at 5:52:47 AM UTC-7, Lou wrote:
Average of the c+-v is 486.111nmCrank
Which gives a correct predicted offset of 0.11A for a classical model. Ives Stillwell 1941 experiment observed an offset of 0.11A
I-S experiment is sensitive to (v/c)^2. So is the Sagnac. Ritz theory passes only tests in (v/c). It fails tests in (v/c)^2.
On Wednesday, 6 September 2023 at 17:04:17 UTC+1, Dono. wrote:
On Wednesday, September 6, 2023 at 5:52:47 AM UTC-7, Lou wrote:
Average of the c+-v is 486.111nmCrank
Which gives a correct predicted offset of 0.11A for a classical model. Ives Stillwell 1941 experiment observed an offset of 0.11A
I-S experiment is sensitive to (v/c)^2. So is the Sagnac. Ritz theory passes only tests in (v/c). It fails tests in (v/c)^2.
At 0.005 v I-S experiment gets *nowhere near* enough v to test if (v/c)^2
On Thursday, September 7, 2023 at 5:13:44 AM UTC-7, Lou wrote:
On Wednesday, 6 September 2023 at 17:04:17 UTC+1, Dono. wrote:
On Wednesday, September 6, 2023 at 5:52:47 AM UTC-7, Lou wrote:
Average of the c+-v is 486.111nmCrank
Which gives a correct predicted offset of 0.11A for a classical model. Ives Stillwell 1941 experiment observed an offset of 0.11A
I-S experiment is sensitive to (v/c)^2. So is the Sagnac. Ritz theory passes only tests in (v/c). It fails tests in (v/c)^2.
At 0.005 v I-S experiment gets *nowhere near* enough v to test if (v/c)^2Actually, it DOES.
As a final kick in your pants , modern reenactments of I-S are done at (v/c)=0.3
Keep eating shit.
On Thursday, September 7, 2023 at 5:13:44?AM UTC-7, Lou wrote:
On Wednesday, 6 September 2023 at 17:04:17 UTC+1, Dono. wrote:
On Wednesday, September 6, 2023 at 5:52:47?AM UTC-7, Lou wrote:
Average of the c+-v is 486.111nmCrank
Which gives a correct predicted offset of 0.11A for a classical model. Ives Stillwell 1941 experiment observed an offset of 0.11A
I-S experiment is sensitive to (v/c)^2. So is the Sagnac. Ritz theory passes only tests in (v/c). It fails tests in (v/c)^2.
At 0.005 v I-S experiment gets *nowhere near* enough v to test if (v/c)^2
Actually, it DOES.
As a final kick in your pants, modern reenactments of I-S are done at (v/c)=0.3
Keep eating shit.
On Thursday, September 7, 2023 at 5:13:44 AM UTC-7, Lou wrote:
On Wednesday, 6 September 2023 at 17:04:17 UTC+1, Dono. wrote:
On Wednesday, September 6, 2023 at 5:52:47 AM UTC-7, Lou wrote:
Average of the c+-v is 486.111nmCrank
Which gives a correct predicted offset of 0.11A for a classical model. Ives Stillwell 1941 experiment observed an offset of 0.11A
I-S experiment is sensitive to (v/c)^2. So is the Sagnac. Ritz theory passes only tests in (v/c). It fails tests in (v/c)^2.
At 0.005 v I-S experiment gets *nowhere near* enough v to test if (v/c)^2Actually, it DOES.
As a final kick in your pants , modern reenactments of I-S are done at (v/c)=0.3
Keep eating shit.
On Thursday, 7 September 2023 at 15:58:32 UTC+1, Dono. wrote:
On Thursday, September 7, 2023 at 5:13:44 AM UTC-7, Lou wrote:
On Wednesday, 6 September 2023 at 17:04:17 UTC+1, Dono. wrote:
On Wednesday, September 6, 2023 at 5:52:47 AM UTC-7, Lou wrote:
Average of the c+-v is 486.111nmCrank
Which gives a correct predicted offset of 0.11A for a classical model.
Ives Stillwell 1941 experiment observed an offset of 0.11A
I-S experiment is sensitive to (v/c)^2. So is the Sagnac. Ritz theory passes only tests in (v/c). It fails tests in (v/c)^2.
And yet at v= 0.005 Ritz theory doesn’t* fail
Instead the Novotny experiment uses 2 lasers to “measure”😂 the Doppler
shifted light. And they are ‘ tuned’ to only measure in and around the wavelengths that special relativity predicts doppler shifting to occur.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 339 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 03:00:21 |
Calls: | 7,467 |
Calls today: | 3 |
Files: | 12,691 |
Messages: | 5,628,080 |