First things first: You have to learn a bit about what is known about cosmic muons. This is a good link, from the Universidad de La Plata (Buenos Aires).one of the all time breakthroughs in physics".
Muon experiments@UNLP
http://www2.fisica.unlp.edu.ar/~veiga/index.html
Go here: The muon flux experiments. Basic facts http://www2.fisica.unlp.edu.ar/~veiga/experiments.html#flux
and then here: The muon lifetime experiment. PART V: Four different versions of the experiment
http://www2.fisica.unlp.edu.ar/~veiga/life53.html
Pay attention to the graphs of "Full histogram (4096 channels)" and
"Reduced histogram (128 channels)".
In both cases, the PDF function P(t) = K/τ e^(-t/τ) is said to fit the histograms statistically, with τ ≈ 2.6 μsec, and K a normalization factor.
Consider that the time span is 5 τ (five 5 rule), after which P(t) ≈ 0.
The mean value of P(t) can be give as E[X] = μ= ∫∞−∞ t P(t)dt = τ ≈ 2.6 μsec
This has been so, in muon experiments since 1962, considering it the greatest success of the special theory of relativity.
But this has been, ALWAYS, a deception, an HOAX. When the average is done after hours or days collecting data of muons decaying into electrons when hitting the scintillator, the INDIVIDUAL TIME of each muon IS LOST.
So, there is NO WAY TO RELATE muon's energy (speed) with TIME.
Only a grotesque average, masqueraded as a statistical proof of TIME DILATION, is presented to gullible imbeciles, who buy what their teachers taught them. And this is BECAUSE the PDF function λ e^(-λt) has been
used, for more than a century, as THE ABSOLUTE PDF FUNCTION OF
EVERYTHING IN NATURE, EVERYWHERE.
You CAN'T prove a deterministic theory like relativity with STATISTICS.
And this applies to all the HOAXES from the golden decade of the '60s.
Now, with A HEAVY HEART, truth start to emerge about muons.
It comes to be that ALL WHAT WAS KNOWN ABOUT THEM IS FALSE.
Read this very rarely known article, from Fermilab (also verified at CERN):
Scientists at Fermilab close in on fifth force of nature https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-66407099
*******
"Dr Mitesh Patel from Imperial College London is among the thousands of physicists at the LHC attempting to find flaws in the Standard Model. He told BBC News that the first people to find experimental results at odds with the standard model would be
.....more than 50 years."
"Measuring behaviour that doesn't agree with the predictions of the Standard Model is the holy grail for particle physics. It would fire the starting-gun for a revolution in our understanding because the model has withstood all experimental tests for
.......
"Their behaviour (muons) is predicted by the standard model, and for fifty years it has predicted their behavior perfectly, with no errors whatsoever".
......
But new experiments (a new generation of experimental physicists) ARE SHOWING THAT WHAT WAS BELIEVED TO BE TRUE FOR SO LONG IS,
ACTUALLY, FALSE (Isn't this revealing a 60 years HOAX?).
The weird behavior of muons in the lab CAN'T BE EXPLAINED, unless a
new and unknown force BE PROPOSED AND THEN "DISCOVERED".
Then, this simple fact ERASES all the strong beliefs in SR and muons
decay, because THEY DIDN'T KNOW/DON'T KNOW what to expect about
muons behavior and the required FIFTH FORCE.
And now, einstenians? What to think, what to do? Tom: something to say?
This mysterious something could be a completely unknown force of nature (the known four are gravitational, electromagnetic and the strong and weak nuclear forces). Alternatively, it could be an unknown exotic particle, or evidence of a new dimension oran undiscovered aspect of space-time.
But whichever way they slice it, the physicists' data suggests that something unknown is nudging and tugging at the muons inside the ring.
On 8/30/2023 12:09 PM, Richard Hertz wrote:or an undiscovered aspect of space-time.
This mysterious something could be a completely unknown force of nature (the known four are gravitational, electromagnetic and the strong and weak nuclear forces). Alternatively, it could be an unknown exotic particle, or evidence of a new dimension
But whichever way they slice it, the physicists' data suggests that something unknown is nudging and tugging at the muons inside the ring.
And your problem with this is......?
This is how science works. They come up with a theory, or set of
theories in the case of the standard model, and then perform experiments
to validate it, and this one suggests something isn't quite correct somewhere.
The Standard Model isn't the Bible, where some minister says "This is
the unalterable Word of God, it is 100% true and if you don't believe, you'll burn in hell forever!" No, science states that the standard model
is how the universe works TO THE BEST OF OUR KNOWLEDGE, we're always
testing it to see how good it is, and if we find surprises (and we hope
we do), we try to understand what's going on to make the model even better.
This g-2 test is relatively minor compared with what's known how the
muon behaves so there won't be anything major like tossing out the
cosmic muon time dilation experiments. But there are predictions that
aren't quite right. And scientists love that stuff.
If I recall there's another puzzle, how the effective radius of the
proton measured using electrons is a bit different from that measured
using muons. I'm not sure if this is from the same cause but who knows.
On Wednesday, August 30, 2023 at 6:41:31 PM UTC-3, Volney wrote:or an undiscovered aspect of space-time.
On 8/30/2023 12:09 PM, Richard Hertz wrote:
This mysterious something could be a completely unknown force of nature (the known four are gravitational, electromagnetic and the strong and weak nuclear forces). Alternatively, it could be an unknown exotic particle, or evidence of a new dimension
But whichever way they slice it, the physicists' data suggests that something unknown is nudging and tugging at the muons inside the ring.
And your problem with this is......?
This is how science works. They come up with a theory, or set of
theories in the case of the standard model, and then perform experiments
to validate it, and this one suggests something isn't quite correct
somewhere.
The Standard Model isn't the Bible, where some minister says "This is
the unalterable Word of God, it is 100% true and if you don't believe,
you'll burn in hell forever!" No, science states that the standard model
is how the universe works TO THE BEST OF OUR KNOWLEDGE, we're always
testing it to see how good it is, and if we find surprises (and we hope
we do), we try to understand what's going on to make the model even better. >>
This g-2 test is relatively minor compared with what's known how the
muon behaves so there won't be anything major like tossing out the
cosmic muon time dilation experiments. But there are predictions that
aren't quite right. And scientists love that stuff.
If I recall there's another puzzle, how the effective radius of the
proton measured using electrons is a bit different from that measured
using muons. I'm not sure if this is from the same cause but who knows.
Whether you like it or not, this NEW FORCE influences in the SACRED STATISTICAL MEAN DECAY TIME of muons.
There are INTERACTIONS not even dreamed before, which make ALL previous measurements a pile of crap, starting in 1962.
Prove me wrong, "Bodkin".
On Wednesday, August 30, 2023 at 6:41:31 PM UTC-3, Volney wrote:dimension or an undiscovered aspect of space-time.
On 8/30/2023 12:09 PM, Richard Hertz wrote:
This mysterious something could be a completely unknown force of nature (the known four are gravitational, electromagnetic and the strong and weak nuclear forces). Alternatively, it could be an unknown exotic particle, or evidence of a new
What!!! Gay Volney is actually Bodkin, back from the dead?????But whichever way they slice it, the physicists' data suggests that something unknown is nudging and tugging at the muons inside the ring.
And your problem with this is......?
This is how science works. They come up with a theory, or set of
theories in the case of the standard model, and then perform experiments to validate it, and this one suggests something isn't quite correct somewhere.
The Standard Model isn't the Bible, where some minister says "This is
the unalterable Word of God, it is 100% true and if you don't believe, you'll burn in hell forever!" No, science states that the standard model is how the universe works TO THE BEST OF OUR KNOWLEDGE, we're always testing it to see how good it is, and if we find surprises (and we hope
we do), we try to understand what's going on to make the model even better.
This g-2 test is relatively minor compared with what's known how the
muon behaves so there won't be anything major like tossing out the
cosmic muon time dilation experiments. But there are predictions that aren't quite right. And scientists love that stuff.
If I recall there's another puzzle, how the effective radius of theWhether you like it or not, this NEW FORCE influences in the SACRED STATISTICAL MEAN DECAY TIME of muons.
proton measured using electrons is a bit different from that measured using muons. I'm not sure if this is from the same cause but who knows.
There are INTERACTIONS not even dreamed before, which make ALL previous measurements a pile of crap, starting in 1962.
Prove me wrong, "Bodkin".
On 8/30/2023 7:06 PM, Richard Hertz wrote:dimension or an undiscovered aspect of space-time.
On Wednesday, August 30, 2023 at 6:41:31 PM UTC-3, Volney wrote:
On 8/30/2023 12:09 PM, Richard Hertz wrote:
This mysterious something could be a completely unknown force of nature (the known four are gravitational, electromagnetic and the strong and weak nuclear forces). Alternatively, it could be an unknown exotic particle, or evidence of a new
But whichever way they slice it, the physicists' data suggests that something unknown is nudging and tugging at the muons inside the ring.
And your problem with this is......?
This is how science works. They come up with a theory, or set of
theories in the case of the standard model, and then perform experiments >> to validate it, and this one suggests something isn't quite correct
somewhere.
The Standard Model isn't the Bible, where some minister says "This is
the unalterable Word of God, it is 100% true and if you don't believe,
you'll burn in hell forever!" No, science states that the standard model >> is how the universe works TO THE BEST OF OUR KNOWLEDGE, we're always
testing it to see how good it is, and if we find surprises (and we hope >> we do), we try to understand what's going on to make the model even better.
This g-2 test is relatively minor compared with what's known how the
muon behaves so there won't be anything major like tossing out the
cosmic muon time dilation experiments. But there are predictions that
aren't quite right. And scientists love that stuff.
If I recall there's another puzzle, how the effective radius of the
proton measured using electrons is a bit different from that measured
using muons. I'm not sure if this is from the same cause but who knows.
There are NO instances of the creation of a zero velocity muon. Every muon ever recognized as such, has ALWAY come with a velocity near the speed of light. So the 2.2 usec half-life of muons is a derived value, entirely dependent upon the theory ofWhether you like it or not, this NEW FORCE influences in the SACRED STATISTICAL MEAN DECAY TIME of muons.And how is that? The decay of muons is measured, and regardless of any
new forces or invisible pink fairies which may cause or influence the decays, the muon half-life is still 2.2µS and all experiments which
depend on that are unaffected. Because they have been measured.
There are INTERACTIONS not even dreamed before, which make ALL previous measurements a pile of crap, starting in 1962.Wrong.
You know, you are really starting to lose it. Rather you're getting
worse and worse. Get help, soon.
Prove me wrong, "Bodkin".It's your claim, it's up to you to prove it's correct.
On 8/30/2023 7:06 PM, Richard Hertz wrote:dimension or an undiscovered aspect of space-time.
On Wednesday, August 30, 2023 at 6:41:31 PM UTC-3, Volney wrote:
On 8/30/2023 12:09 PM, Richard Hertz wrote:
This mysterious something could be a completely unknown force of nature (the known four are gravitational, electromagnetic and the strong and weak nuclear forces). Alternatively, it could be an unknown exotic particle, or evidence of a new
But whichever way they slice it, the physicists' data suggests that something unknown is nudging and tugging at the muons inside the ring.
And your problem with this is......?
This is how science works. They come up with a theory, or set of
theories in the case of the standard model, and then perform experiments >> to validate it, and this one suggests something isn't quite correct
somewhere.
The Standard Model isn't the Bible, where some minister says "This is
the unalterable Word of God, it is 100% true and if you don't believe,
you'll burn in hell forever!" No, science states that the standard model >> is how the universe works TO THE BEST OF OUR KNOWLEDGE, we're always
testing it to see how good it is, and if we find surprises (and we hope >> we do), we try to understand what's going on to make the model even better.
This g-2 test is relatively minor compared with what's known how the
muon behaves so there won't be anything major like tossing out the
cosmic muon time dilation experiments. But there are predictions that
aren't quite right. And scientists love that stuff.
If I recall there's another puzzle, how the effective radius of the
proton measured using electrons is a bit different from that measured
using muons. I'm not sure if this is from the same cause but who knows.
Whether you like it or not, this NEW FORCE influences in the SACRED STATISTICAL MEAN DECAY TIME of muons.And how is that? The decay of muons is measured, and regardless of any
new forces or invisible pink fairies which may cause or influence the decays, the muon half-life is still 2.2µS and all experiments which
depend on that are unaffected. Because they have been measured.
There are INTERACTIONS not even dreamed before, which make ALL previous measurements a pile of crap, starting in 1962.Wrong.
You know, you are really starting to lose it. Rather you're getting
worse and worse. Get help, soon.
Prove me wrong, "Bodkin".It's your claim, it's up to you to prove it's correct.
There are NO instances of the creation of a zero velocity muon.
Every muon ever recognized as such, has ALWAY come with a velocity near the speed of light.
So the 2.2 usec half-life of muons is a derived value, entirely dependent upon the theory of special relativity.
On Wednesday, August 30, 2023 at 10:18:43 PM UTC-3, Volney wrote:
On 8/30/2023 7:06 PM, Richard Hertz wrote:
Prove me wrong, "Bodkin".
It's your claim, it's up to you to prove it's correct.
These links, from the Universidad de La Plata (Buenos Aires), may teach something to you about how
the statistical mean decay value is measured. ALSO, it will teach you about the COMPLETE DISCONNECTION
between muon's proper time and measurements, because IT CAN'T BE MEASURED.
On 8/30/2023 9:58 PM, Richard Hertz wrote:
On Wednesday, August 30, 2023 at 10:18:43 PM UTC-3, Volney wrote:
On 8/30/2023 7:06 PM, Richard Hertz wrote:
Prove me wrong, "Bodkin".
It's your claim, it's up to you to prove it's correct.
These links, from the Universidad de La Plata (Buenos Aires), may teach something to you about howI said prove your claim to be correct. All you did is babble nonsense
the statistical mean decay value is measured. ALSO, it will teach you about the COMPLETE DISCONNECTION
between muon's proper time and measurements, because IT CAN'T BE MEASURED.
and link to a site that has nothing to do with your claim.
[snip nonsense]
On 8/30/2023 7:06 PM, Richard Hertz wrote:dimension or an undiscovered aspect of space-time.
On Wednesday, August 30, 2023 at 6:41:31 PM UTC-3, Volney wrote:
On 8/30/2023 12:09 PM, Richard Hertz wrote:
This mysterious something could be a completely unknown force of nature (the known four are gravitational, electromagnetic and the strong and weak nuclear forces). Alternatively, it could be an unknown exotic particle, or evidence of a new
But whichever way they slice it, the physicists' data suggests that something unknown is nudging and tugging at the muons inside the ring.
And your problem with this is......?
This is how science works. They come up with a theory, or set of
theories in the case of the standard model, and then perform experiments >> to validate it, and this one suggests something isn't quite correct
somewhere.
The Standard Model isn't the Bible, where some minister says "This is
the unalterable Word of God, it is 100% true and if you don't believe,
you'll burn in hell forever!" No, science states that the standard model >> is how the universe works TO THE BEST OF OUR KNOWLEDGE, we're always
testing it to see how good it is, and if we find surprises (and we hope >> we do), we try to understand what's going on to make the model even better.
This g-2 test is relatively minor compared with what's known how the
muon behaves so there won't be anything major like tossing out the
cosmic muon time dilation experiments. But there are predictions that
aren't quite right. And scientists love that stuff.
If I recall there's another puzzle, how the effective radius of the
proton measured using electrons is a bit different from that measured
using muons. I'm not sure if this is from the same cause but who knows.
Whether you like it or not, this NEW FORCE influences in the SACRED STATISTICAL MEAN DECAY TIME of muons.And how is that? The decay of muons is measured, and regardless of any
On Wednesday, August 30, 2023 at 1:17:45?AM UTC-3, Richard Hertz wrote:[press release hype]
In an experiment with the catchy name 'g minus two (g-2)' the researchers accelerate the sub-atomic particles called muons around a 15m-diameter
ring, where they are circulated about 1,000 times at nearly the speed of light. The researchers found that they might be behaving in a way that
can't be explained by the current theory, which is called the Standard
Model, because of the influence of a new force of nature.
Scientists speculate that muons might gyrate differently because they're interacting with a short-lived quantum foam that blinks in and out of existence. Knowing the exact value of g could point the way to the "dance partner" particles affecting it.The latest round of results were very precise, corresponding to an error of 0.20 parts per million.
https://www.livescience.com/physics-mathematics/wobbling-muon-experiment-c ould-reveal-a-5th-force-of-nature-if-the-results-hold-up Wobbling muon experiment could reveal a 5th force of nature — if the results hold up
By looking at how muons wobbled as they made thousands of laps around the 50-foot-diameter (15 meters) ring, the physicists compiled data suggesting that the muon was wobbling far more than it should be.
The explanation, the study scientists say, is the existence of something
not yet accounted for by the Standard Model — the set of equations that explain all subatomic particles, which has remained unchanged since the mid-1970s.
This mysterious something could be a completely unknown force of nature
(the known four are gravitational, electromagnetic and the strong and weak nuclear forces). Alternatively, it could be an unknown exotic particle, or evidence of a new dimension or an undiscovered aspect of space-time.
But whichever way they slice it, the physicists' data suggests that
something unknown is nudging and tugging at the muons inside the ring.
Richard Hertz <hert...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wednesday, August 30, 2023 at 1:17:45?AM UTC-3, Richard Hertz wrote:[press release hype]
In an experiment with the catchy name 'g minus two (g-2)' the researchers accelerate the sub-atomic particles called muons around a 15m-diameter ring, where they are circulated about 1,000 times at nearly the speed of light. The researchers found that they might be behaving in a way that can't be explained by the current theory, which is called the Standard Model, because of the influence of a new force of nature.
Relativity in action, for the nutters.
Richard Hertz <hert...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wednesday, August 30, 2023 at 1:17:45?AM UTC-3, Richard Hertz wrote:[press release hype]
In an experiment with the catchy name 'g minus two (g-2)' the researchers accelerate the sub-atomic particles called muons around a 15m-diameter ring, where they are circulated about 1,000 times at nearly the speed of light. The researchers found that they might be behaving in a way that can't be explained by the current theory, which is called the Standard Model, because of the influence of a new force of nature.
Relativity in action, for the nutters.
Rough round numbers: 15m diameter is 50m cicumference,
times thousand times round makes 50 kilometers.
At lightspeed that takes over 15 milliseconds.
Not bad, for a muon with 2 microseconds lifetime, at rest.
And yes, they are at 3GeV, with a rest mass of 100 MeV,
so it all checks.
Scientists speculate that muons might gyrate differently because they're interacting with a short-lived quantum foam that blinks in and out of existence. Knowing the exact value of g could point the way to the "dance partner" particles affecting it.The latest round of results were very precise, corresponding to an error of 0.20 parts per million.
Yes, and that is for g-2.
For g itself it is three orders of magnitude better.
https://www.livescience.com/physics-mathematics/wobbling-muon-experiment-c ould-reveal-a-5th-force-of-nature-if-the-results-hold-up Wobbling muon experiment could reveal a 5th force of nature — if the results hold up
FYI, all this 'wobbling' talk (is if the muon is behaving erratically)
is baby talk for people with at most a third-hand understanding of it.
Those in the know will know that is just precession.
(like Mercury's perihelion)
By looking at how muons wobbled as they made thousands of laps around the 50-foot-diameter (15 meters) ring, the physicists compiled data suggesting that the muon was wobbling far more than it should be.
Yes 'far more', all of less than one part in 10^-9
The explanation, the study scientists say, is the existence of something not yet accounted for by the Standard Model — the set of equations that explain all subatomic particles, which has remained unchanged since the mid-1970s.
This mysterious something could be a completely unknown force of nature (the known four are gravitational, electromagnetic and the strong and weak nuclear forces). Alternatively, it could be an unknown exotic particle, or evidence of a new dimension or an undiscovered aspect of space-time.
But whichever way they slice it, the physicists' data suggests that something unknown is nudging and tugging at the muons inside the ring.Yes, and that is all it is. It is a meaningless number that doesn't tell
you anything at all, beyond something being not quite right.
We just have no idea at all of what that 'something' may be,
(wait for a theory that produced it 'naturally')
Jan
On Thursday, August 31, 2023 at 6:23:53 AM UTC-3, J. J. Lodder wrote:
Richard Hertz <hert...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wednesday, August 30, 2023 at 1:17:45?AM UTC-3, Richard Hertz wrote:[press release hype]
In an experiment with the catchy name 'g minus two (g-2)' the researchers
accelerate the sub-atomic particles called muons around a 15m-diameter ring, where they are circulated about 1,000 times at nearly the speed of light. The researchers found that they might be behaving in a way that can't be explained by the current theory, which is called the Standard Model, because of the influence of a new force of nature.
Relativity in action, for the nutters.
Rough round numbers: 15m diameter is 50m cicumference,
times thousand times round makes 50 kilometers.
At lightspeed that takes over 15 milliseconds.
Not bad, for a muon with 2 microseconds lifetime, at rest.
And yes, they are at 3GeV, with a rest mass of 100 MeV,
so it all checks.
Scientists speculate that muons might gyrate differently because they're interacting with a short-lived quantum foam that blinks in and out of existence. Knowing the exact value of g could point the way to the "dance
partner" particles affecting it.The latest round of results were very precise, corresponding to an error of 0.20 parts per million.
Yes, and that is for g-2.
For g itself it is three orders of magnitude better.
https://www.livescience.com/physics-mathematics/wobbling-muon-experiment-c
ould-reveal-a-5th-force-of-nature-if-the-results-hold-up Wobbling muon experiment could reveal a 5th force of nature — if the results hold up
FYI, all this 'wobbling' talk (is if the muon is behaving erratically)
is baby talk for people with at most a third-hand understanding of it. Those in the know will know that is just precession.
(like Mercury's perihelion)
By looking at how muons wobbled as they made thousands of laps around the
50-foot-diameter (15 meters) ring, the physicists compiled data suggesting
that the muon was wobbling far more than it should be.
Yes 'far more', all of less than one part in 10^-9
The explanation, the study scientists say, is the existence of something not yet accounted for by the Standard Model — the set of equations that
explain all subatomic particles, which has remained unchanged since the mid-1970s.
This mysterious something could be a completely unknown force of nature (the known four are gravitational, electromagnetic and the strong and weak
nuclear forces). Alternatively, it could be an unknown exotic particle, or
evidence of a new dimension or an undiscovered aspect of space-time.
But whichever way they slice it, the physicists' data suggests that something unknown is nudging and tugging at the muons inside the ring.Yes, and that is all it is. It is a meaningless number that doesn't tell you anything at all, beyond something being not quite right.
We just have no idea at all of what that 'something' may be,
(wait for a theory that produced it 'naturally')
Jan1) This is what was allowed to be published, in order to not spread panic among idiot relativists like you.
On Thursday, August 31, 2023 at 7:54:06?AM UTC-7, Richard Hertz wrote:-c
On Thursday, August 31, 2023 at 6:23:53?AM UTC-3, J. J. Lodder wrote:
Richard Hertz <hert...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wednesday, August 30, 2023 at 1:17:45?AM UTC-3, Richard Hertz wrote:[press release hype]
In an experiment with the catchy name 'g minus two (g-2)' the researchers accelerate the sub-atomic particles called muons around
a 15m-diameter ring, where they are circulated about 1,000 times at nearly the speed of light. The researchers found that they might be behaving in a way that can't be explained by the current theory,
which is called the Standard Model, because of the influence of a
new force of nature.
Relativity in action, for the nutters.
Rough round numbers: 15m diameter is 50m cicumference,
times thousand times round makes 50 kilometers.
At lightspeed that takes over 15 milliseconds.
Not bad, for a muon with 2 microseconds lifetime, at rest.
And yes, they are at 3GeV, with a rest mass of 100 MeV,
so it all checks.
Scientists speculate that muons might gyrate differently because they're interacting with a short-lived quantum foam that blinks in
and out of existence. Knowing the exact value of g could point the
way to the "dance partner" particles affecting it.The latest round
of results were very precise, corresponding to an error of 0.20
parts per million.
Yes, and that is for g-2.
For g itself it is three orders of magnitude better.
https://www.livescience.com/physics-mathematics/wobbling-muon-experiment
ould-reveal-a-5th-force-of-nature-if-the-results-hold-up Wobbling muon experiment could reveal a 5th force of nature — if the results hold up
FYI, all this 'wobbling' talk (is if the muon is behaving erratically)
is baby talk for people with at most a third-hand understanding of it. Those in the know will know that is just precession.
(like Mercury's perihelion)
By looking at how muons wobbled as they made thousands of laps
around the 50-foot-diameter (15 meters) ring, the physicists
compiled data suggesting that the muon was wobbling far more than it should be.
Yes 'far more', all of less than one part in 10^-9
The explanation, the study scientists say, is the existence ofsomething > not yet accounted for by the Standard Model — the set of equations that > explain all subatomic particles, which has remained unchanged since the > mid-1970s. > > This mysterious something could
be a completely unknown force of nature > (the known four are gravitational, electromagnetic and the strong and weak > nuclear
forces). Alternatively, it could be an unknown exotic particle, or > evidence of a new dimension or an undiscovered aspect of space-time. >
But whichever way they slice it, the physicists' data suggests that something unknown is nudging and tugging at the muons inside thering. Yes, and that is all it is. It is a meaningless number that
doesn't tell you anything at all, beyond something being not quite
right.
We just have no idea at all of what that 'something' may be,
(wait for a theory that produced it 'naturally')
Jan1) This is what was allowed to be published, in order to not spread
panic among idiot relativists like you.
Why do you assume that negating relativity experimentally would "spread panic"
among physicists? Why do you assume this silly James-Bond-like scenario?
It's called "dream factory" for a reason.
On Wednesday, August 30, 2023 at 11:51:48 PM UTC-3, Volney wrote:
On 8/30/2023 9:58 PM, Richard Hertz wrote:
On Wednesday, August 30, 2023 at 10:18:43 PM UTC-3, Volney wrote:and link to a site that has nothing to do with your claim.
On 8/30/2023 7:06 PM, Richard Hertz wrote:
Prove me wrong, "Bodkin".
It's your claim, it's up to you to prove it's correct.
These links, from the Universidad de La Plata (Buenos Aires), may teach something to you about how
the statistical mean decay value is measured. ALSO, it will teach you about the COMPLETE DISCONNECTION
between muon's proper time and measurements, because IT CAN'T BE MEASURED. >> I said prove your claim to be correct. All you did is babble nonsense
[snip nonsense]
You can't interpret text and graphics (Uni. La Plata), nor decode the breaking news about the mystery of muon behavior
moving at almost c for 10 Km, even when passing through layers of attenuation of its energy.
Keep waiting for the confirmation, then, in the next months.
Nothing that was known about muons is true, and it breaks the SMEP and the fake proves of SR time dilation.
On 8/31/2023 12:22 AM, Richard Hertz wrote:
On Wednesday, August 30, 2023 at 11:51:48 PM UTC-3, Volney wrote:
On 8/30/2023 9:58 PM, Richard Hertz wrote:
On Wednesday, August 30, 2023 at 10:18:43 PM UTC-3, Volney wrote:I said prove your claim to be correct. All you did is babble nonsense
On 8/30/2023 7:06 PM, Richard Hertz wrote:
Prove me wrong, "Bodkin".
It's your claim, it's up to you to prove it's correct.
These links, from the Universidad de La Plata (Buenos Aires), may teach something to you about how
the statistical mean decay value is measured. ALSO, it will teach you about the COMPLETE DISCONNECTION
between muon's proper time and measurements, because IT CAN'T BE MEASURED.
and link to a site that has nothing to do with your claim.
[snip nonsense]
You can't interpret text and graphics (Uni. La Plata), nor decode the breaking news about the mystery of muon behaviorThere is nothing there that disproves relativity or the measured
lifetime of muons.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 300 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 17:12:21 |
| Calls: | 6,707 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 12,239 |
| Messages: | 5,351,354 |