• A final stroke to relativity, exposing the HOAX of muons decay time.

From Richard Hertz@21:1/5 to All on Tue Aug 29 21:18:03 2023
First things first: You have to learn a bit about what is known about cosmic muons. This is a good link, from the Universidad de La Plata (Buenos Aires).

Muon experiments@UNLP
http://www2.fisica.unlp.edu.ar/~veiga/index.html

Go here: The muon flux experiments. Basic facts http://www2.fisica.unlp.edu.ar/~veiga/experiments.html#flux

and then here: The muon lifetime experiment. PART V: Four different versions of the experiment

http://www2.fisica.unlp.edu.ar/~veiga/life53.html

Pay attention to the graphs of "Full histogram (4096 channels)" and
"Reduced histogram (128 channels)".

In both cases, the PDF function P(t) = K/τ e^(-t/τ) is said to fit the histograms statistically, with τ ≈ 2.6 μsec, and K a normalization factor. Consider that the time span is 5 τ (five 5 rule), after which P(t) ≈ 0.

The mean value of P(t) can be give as E[X] = μ= ∫∞−∞ t P(t)dt = τ ≈ 2.6 μsec

This has been so, in muon experiments since 1962, considering it the
greatest success of the special theory of relativity.

But this has been, ALWAYS, a deception, an HOAX. When the average is done
after hours or days collecting data of muons decaying into electrons when hitting the scintillator, the INDIVIDUAL TIME of each muon IS LOST.

So, there is NO WAY TO RELATE muon's energy (speed) with TIME.

Only a grotesque average, masqueraded as a statistical proof of TIME
DILATION, is presented to gullible imbeciles, who buy what their teachers taught them. And this is BECAUSE the PDF function λ e^(-λt) has been
used, for more than a century, as THE ABSOLUTE PDF FUNCTION OF
EVERYTHING IN NATURE, EVERYWHERE.

You CAN'T prove a deterministic theory like relativity with STATISTICS.
And this applies to all the HOAXES from the golden decade of the '60s.

Now, with A HEAVY HEART, truth start to emerge about muons.

It comes to be that ALL WHAT WAS KNOWN ABOUT THEM IS FALSE.

Read this very rarely known article, from Fermilab (also verified at CERN):

Scientists at Fermilab close in on fifth force of nature https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-66407099

*******
"Dr Mitesh Patel from Imperial College London is among the thousands of physicists at the LHC attempting to find flaws in the Standard Model. He told BBC News that the first people to find experimental results at odds with the standard model would be one
of the all time breakthroughs in physics".
.....
"Measuring behaviour that doesn't agree with the predictions of the Standard Model is the holy grail for particle physics. It would fire the starting-gun for a revolution in our understanding because the model has withstood all experimental tests for
more than 50 years."
.......
"Their behaviour (muons) is predicted by the standard model, and for fifty years it has predicted their behavior perfectly, with no errors whatsoever".
......

But new experiments (a new generation of experimental physicists) ARE
SHOWING THAT WHAT WAS BELIEVED TO BE TRUE FOR SO LONG IS,
ACTUALLY, FALSE (Isn't this revealing a 60 years HOAX?).

The weird behavior of muons in the lab CAN'T BE EXPLAINED, unless a
new and unknown force BE PROPOSED AND THEN "DISCOVERED".

Then, this simple fact ERASES all the strong beliefs in SR and muons
decay, because THEY DIDN'T KNOW/DON'T KNOW what to expect about
muons behavior and the required FIFTH FORCE.

And now, einstenians? What to think, what to do? Tom: something to say?

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
• From Richard Hertz@21:1/5 to All on Tue Aug 29 21:17:42 2023
First things first: You have to learn a bit about what is known about cosmic muons. This is a good link, from the Universidad de La Plata (Buenos Aires).

Muon experiments@UNLP
http://www2.fisica.unlp.edu.ar/~veiga/index.html

Go here: The muon flux experiments. Basic facts http://www2.fisica.unlp.edu.ar/~veiga/experiments.html#flux

and then here: The muon lifetime experiment. PART V: Four different versions of the experiment

http://www2.fisica.unlp.edu.ar/~veiga/life53.html

Pay attention to the graphs of "Full histogram (4096 channels)" and
"Reduced histogram (128 channels)".

In both cases, the PDF function P(t) = K/τ e^(-t/τ) is said to fit the histograms statistically, with τ ≈ 2.6 μsec, and K a normalization factor. Consider that the time span is 5 τ (five 5 rule), after which P(t) ≈ 0.

The mean value of P(t) can be give as E[X] = μ= ∫∞−∞ t P(t)dt = τ ≈ 2.6 μsec

This has been so, in muon experiments since 1962, considering it the
greatest success of the special theory of relativity.

But this has been, ALWAYS, a deception, an HOAX. When the average is done
after hours or days collecting data of muons decaying into electrons when hitting the scintillator, the INDIVIDUAL TIME of each muon IS LOST.

So, there is NO WAY TO RELATE muon's energy (speed) with TIME.

Only a grotesque average, masqueraded as a statistical proof of TIME
DILATION, is presented to gullible imbeciles, who buy what their teachers taught them. And this is BECAUSE the PDF function λ e^(-λt) has been
used, for more than a century, as THE ABSOLUTE PDF FUNCTION OF
EVERYTHING IN NATURE, EVERYWHERE.

You CAN'T prove a deterministic theory like relativity with STATISTICS.
And this applies to all the HOAXES from the golden decade of the '60s.

Now, with A HEAVY HEART, truth start to emerge about muons.

It comes to be that ALL WHAT WAS KNOWN ABOUT THEM IS FALSE.

Read this very rarely known article, from Fermilab (also verified at CERN):

Scientists at Fermilab close in on fifth force of nature https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-66407099

*******
"Dr Mitesh Patel from Imperial College London is among the thousands of physicists at the LHC attempting to find flaws in the Standard Model. He told BBC News that the first people to find experimental results at odds with the standard model would be one
of the all time breakthroughs in physics".
.....
"Measuring behaviour that doesn't agree with the predictions of the Standard Model is the holy grail for particle physics. It would fire the starting-gun for a revolution in our understanding because the model has withstood all experimental tests for
more than 50 years."
.......
"Their behaviour (muons) is predicted by the standard model, and for fifty years it has predicted their behavior perfectly, with no errors whatsoever".
......

But new experiments (a new generation of experimental physicists) ARE
SHOWING THAT WHAT WAS BELIEVED TO BE TRUE FOR SO LONG IS,
ACTUALLY, FALSE (Isn't this revealing a 60 years HOAX?).

The weird behavior of muons in the lab CAN'T BE EXPLAINED, unless a
new and unknown force BE PROPOSED AND THEN "DISCOVERED".

Then, this simple fact ERASES all the strong beliefs in SR and muons
decay, because THEY DIDN'T KNOW/DON'T KNOW what to expect about
muons behavior and the required FIFTH FORCE.

And now, einstenians? What to think, what to do? Tom: something to say?

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)