• =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Promoting_the_=E2=80=9CCult=E2=80=9D_of_Einstein?=

    From mitchrae3323@gmail.com@21:1/5 to Richard Hertz on Sun Aug 20 18:27:51 2023
    On Tuesday, August 15, 2023 at 9:57:31 AM UTC-7, Richard Hertz wrote:
    Even Einstein disliked his new role, but he had to pay to his masters:

    If that were true why did he reject his Nobel prize photon 1937?
    He said light is a spherical wavelet instead.

    Mitchell Raemsch

    https://isidore.co/CalibreLibrary/Bjerknes,%20Christopher%20Jon/The%20Manufacture%20and%20Sale%20of%20Saint%20Einstein%20(4709)/The%20Manufacture%20and%20Sale%20of%20Saint%20Einstein%20-%20Bjerknes,%20Christopher%20Jon.pdf

    *************************************
    In an epiphany of Saint Einstein, Jewish journalist Alexander Moszkowski wrote to Albert Einstein on 1 February 1917,

    “Regardless of what happens, I would like to continue the ‘cult’; for you it
    is secondary, for me, it is of paramount importance in life. Additionally, I have the encouraging feeling that, with my modest writing abilities, I may also serve the cause once in a while.”3

    Moszkowski used his writing talents to make Einstein a superstar. In
    October 1919, Moszkowski fulfilled his promise to Einstein to promote
    the “cult” of Einstein, and began the international “Einstein mania”, which
    peaked in November and December 1919.

    Einstein knew that the newspaper hype was disingenuous and distasteful,
    but he blamed the public for the hype his racist Jewish friends had manufactured. In mid-December, 1919, Einstein wrote to his friend and confidant Heinrich Zangger,

    “The newspaper drivel about me is pathetic; this kind of exaggeration meets
    a certain need among the public. Really, a harmless ideology.”4

    On 24 December 1919, Einstein wrote to Zangger and justified the lies as “harmless tomfoolery”,

    “[T]his business reminds one of the tale of ‘The Emperor’s New Clothes,’
    but it is a harmless tomfoolery. [***] The disparity between what you are and
    what others believe, or at least, say about you, is far too great.”

    **********

    Do Not Blaspheme the “Jewish Saint”

    When Einstein arrived in America in early April of 1921, shortly after Einstein,
    himself, declared that anyone who disagreed with him must ipso facto be anti-Semitic, the Board of Aldermen of the City of New York met to vote on a proposal to grant Chaim Weizmann and Albert Einstein the “freedom of the city”.

    Alderman Bruce M. Falconer voted against the proposal and was
    immediately assaulted, threatened with severe retaliation and smeared as
    an “anti-Semite”—an accusation he emphatically denied. The New York Times, which was owned by a Jewish publisher named Adolph S. Ochs,
    published Alderman Falconer’s name, occupation, and home address,
    on the front page together with the charges of anti-Semitism, a description of the assault against him, and a report of the threats to destroy him, as well as his denials of any prejudice.

    Several stories describing the spectacle appeared in The New York Times, beginning with 6 April 1921,
    ....
    At the request of Aldermanic President LaGuardia, Mayor Hylan has
    called a special meeting of the Board for next Friday at 1:30 P. M., to take action on the resolution.

    ‘I am expressing the feeling of the entire Board when I ask you to call this meeting in order that the desires of the people of this city may be carried out in extending this call to these distinguished people,’ he said to the Mayor.

    Professor Weizmann is President of the International Zionist
    Organization, and, with Professor Einstein, M. M. Ussischkin and Dr.
    Benzion Mossinson, is here to confer with American Zionists. They
    were received at the City Hall yesterday by Mayor Hylan and a committee
    of citizens. More than 5,000 Zionists filled the plaza in front of the City Hall.
    .....
    Einstein wrote to Paul Ehrenfest on 12 April 1926,

    “I do believe that in time this endeavor will grow into something splendid;
    and, Jewish Saint that I am, my heart rejoices.”92

    *******
    RELATIVITY IS A CULT, A METAPHYSICAL CONSTRUCTION THAT HAS
    TRIED TO DESTROY THE CONCEPTS OF SPACE AND TIME.

    AN IMMORAL PSEUDOSCIENCE, WHICH ERODES THE VALUES AND
    GROUNDS OF REAL SCIENCE. A FALLACIOUS FIELD OF PHILOSOPHY,
    FULL OF CONTRADICTIONS, FLAWS AND PARADOXES, WHICH HAS
    BEEN SEEKING, FOR A CENTURY, TO CONSOLIDATE JEWISH GRAB OF
    POWER IN EVERY SINGLE HUMAN ACTIVITY.

    TRY TO NAME ANY FIELD, AND CHECK WHO'S IN FRONT OF IT, RIGHT NOW.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)