• Re: The claim that texbooks are wrong about the Special Theory.

    From Dono.@21:1/5 to Dono. on Thu May 4 21:33:53 2023
    On Thursday, May 4, 2023 at 9:25:18 PM UTC-7, Dono. wrote:
    On Thursday, May 4, 2023 at 9:19:36 PM UTC-7, gehan.am...@gmail.com wrote:
    snip cretinisms<

    Ed Lake is an idiot. Just like you, Gehan.


    Instead of digging out crank garbage why don't you study a decent book like https://www.academia.edu/24640043/Special_Relativity ? It might get you out of the lunatic asylum. May not be too late....

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From gehan.ameresekere@gmail.com@21:1/5 to All on Thu May 4 21:19:34 2023
    An Analysis of Einstein's Second Postulate to his Theory of Special Relativity

    Ed Lake
    362 Views
    28 Pages
    1 File ▾
    Physics
    An analysis of books, presentations and scientific papers about Albert Einstein's Second Postulate to his Theory of Special Relativity shows that there is a fundamental disagreement between what Einstein wrote and how what he wrote is being interpreted
    by mathematician-physicists and taught in colleges and universities around the world. An analysis of the evidence shows that Einstein was correct and the vast majority of interpretations and teachings are incorrect.

    https://www.academia.edu/33891959/An_Analysis_of_Einsteins_Second_Postulate_to_his_Theory_of_Special_Relativity

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dono.@21:1/5 to gehan.am...@gmail.com on Thu May 4 21:25:16 2023
    On Thursday, May 4, 2023 at 9:19:36 PM UTC-7, gehan.am...@gmail.com wrote:
    snip cretinisms<

    Ed Lake is an idiot. Just like you, Gehan.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From gehan.ameresekere@gmail.com@21:1/5 to Dono. on Fri May 5 03:41:04 2023
    On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 9:33:55 AM UTC+5, Dono. wrote:
    On Thursday, May 4, 2023 at 9:25:18 PM UTC-7, Dono. wrote:
    On Thursday, May 4, 2023 at 9:19:36 PM UTC-7, gehan.am...@gmail.com wrote:
    snip cretinisms<

    Ed Lake is an idiot. Just like you, Gehan.
    Instead of digging out crank garbage why don't you study a decent book like https://www.academia.edu/24640043/Special_Relativity ? It might get you out of the lunatic asylum. May not be too late....

    Thank you, I liked the nuclear bomb explosion on the cover it is a warning to cretin, I guess.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Volney@21:1/5 to gehan.am...@gmail.com on Fri May 5 12:35:45 2023
    On 5/5/2023 12:19 AM, gehan.am...@gmail.com wrote:

    An Analysis of Einstein's Second Postulate to his Theory of Special Relativity

    Ed Lake
    362 Views
    28 Pages
    1 File ▾
    Physics
    An analysis of books, presentations and scientific papers about Albert Einstein's Second Postulate to his Theory of Special Relativity shows that there is a fundamental disagreement between what Einstein wrote and how what he wrote is being interpreted
    by mathematician-physicists and taught in colleges and universities around the world. An analysis of the evidence shows that Einstein was correct and the vast majority of interpretations and teachings are incorrect.

    https://www.academia.edu/33891959/An_Analysis_of_Einsteins_Second_Postulate_to_his_Theory_of_Special_Relativity

    Ed Lake? Ed Lake? THAT Ed Lake?


    Hahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dono.@21:1/5 to gehan.am...@gmail.com on Fri May 5 09:41:16 2023
    On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 3:41:06 AM UTC-7, gehan.am...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 9:33:55 AM UTC+5, Dono. wrote:
    On Thursday, May 4, 2023 at 9:25:18 PM UTC-7, Dono. wrote:
    On Thursday, May 4, 2023 at 9:19:36 PM UTC-7, gehan.am...@gmail.com wrote:
    snip cretinisms<

    Ed Lake is an idiot. Just like you, Gehan.
    Instead of digging out crank garbage why don't you study a decent book like https://www.academia.edu/24640043/Special_Relativity ? It might get you out of the lunatic asylum. May not be too late....
    Thank you, I liked the nuclear bomb explosion on the cover it is a warning to cretin, I guess.

    I didn't see it as a warning to you but if you want to take it this way, be my guest.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JanPB@21:1/5 to gehan.am...@gmail.com on Fri May 5 13:30:35 2023
    On Thursday, May 4, 2023 at 9:19:36 PM UTC-7, gehan.am...@gmail.com wrote:
    An Analysis of Einstein's Second Postulate to his Theory of Special Relativity

    Ed Lake
    362 Views
    28 Pages
    1 File ▾
    Physics
    An analysis of books, presentations and scientific papers about Albert Einstein's Second Postulate to his Theory of Special Relativity shows that there is a fundamental disagreement between what Einstein wrote and how what he wrote is being interpreted
    by mathematician-physicists and taught in colleges and universities around the world. An analysis of the evidence shows that Einstein was correct and the vast majority of interpretations and teachings are incorrect.

    No, they are the same. Modern textbooks use a bit different derivation logic but
    the theory ends up equivalent. But it's true IMHO that modern textbook treatment of SR is pedagogically inferior and seems unnecessary puzzling and whimsical to the student.

    --
    Jan

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From carl eto@21:1/5 to All on Fri May 5 16:10:52 2023
    The question back then was Maxwell's theory and the ether. You guys are a bunch of stupid mother fucker

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From gehan.ameresekere@gmail.com@21:1/5 to JanPB on Sat May 6 08:01:06 2023
    On Saturday, May 6, 2023 at 1:30:37 AM UTC+5, JanPB wrote:
    On Thursday, May 4, 2023 at 9:19:36 PM UTC-7, gehan.am...@gmail.com wrote:
    An Analysis of Einstein's Second Postulate to his Theory of Special Relativity

    Ed Lake
    362 Views
    28 Pages
    1 File ▾
    Physics
    An analysis of books, presentations and scientific papers about Albert Einstein's Second Postulate to his Theory of Special Relativity shows that there is a fundamental disagreement between what Einstein wrote and how what he wrote is being
    interpreted by mathematician-physicists and taught in colleges and universities around the world. An analysis of the evidence shows that Einstein was correct and the vast majority of interpretations and teachings are incorrect.
    No, they are the same. Modern textbooks use a bit different derivation logic but
    the theory ends up equivalent. But it's true IMHO that modern textbook treatment of SR is pedagogically inferior and seems unnecessary puzzling and whimsical to the student.

    --
    Jan

    There are two textbooks I am looking at at the moment.

    https://www.amazon.com/Special-Relativity-Enthusiastic-David-Morin/dp/1542323517

    And

    https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Special_Relativity

    Any concerns?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dono.@21:1/5 to gehan.am...@gmail.com on Sat May 6 08:08:26 2023
    On Saturday, May 6, 2023 at 8:01:08 AM UTC-7, gehan.am...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Saturday, May 6, 2023 at 1:30:37 AM UTC+5, JanPB wrote:
    On Thursday, May 4, 2023 at 9:19:36 PM UTC-7, gehan.am...@gmail.com wrote:
    An Analysis of Einstein's Second Postulate to his Theory of Special Relativity

    Ed Lake
    362 Views
    28 Pages
    1 File ▾
    Physics
    An analysis of books, presentations and scientific papers about Albert Einstein's Second Postulate to his Theory of Special Relativity shows that there is a fundamental disagreement between what Einstein wrote and how what he wrote is being
    interpreted by mathematician-physicists and taught in colleges and universities around the world. An analysis of the evidence shows that Einstein was correct and the vast majority of interpretations and teachings are incorrect.
    No, they are the same. Modern textbooks use a bit different derivation logic but
    the theory ends up equivalent. But it's true IMHO that modern textbook treatment of SR is pedagogically inferior and seems unnecessary puzzling and
    whimsical to the student.

    --
    Jan
    There are two textbooks I am looking at at the moment.

    https://www.amazon.com/Special-Relativity-Enthusiastic-David-Morin/dp/1542323517

    And

    https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Special_Relativity

    Any concerns?

    Just read them, learn and stop wasting your time posting imbecilities on this forum (or any other forum)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)