• The Evil Ideologues of Einstein's Relativity

    From Pentcho Valev@21:1/5 to All on Thu May 4 09:04:41 2023
    Neil deGrasse Tyson informs his numerous fans that the fast-moving observer sees time in the stationary world SPEED UP:

    https://youtu.be/1BCkSYQ0NRQ?t=291

    Einstein's 1905 postulates, true or false, entail the opposite: the fast-moving observer sees time in the stationary world SLOW DOWN. This is easy to deduce by considering a scenario in which the fast-moving observer checks stationary clocks against his
    spaceship's clocks.

    Why is Neil deGrasse Tyson so dishonest as to abuse even special relativity's logic? He has no other choice. Imagine that he obeys logic and informs his fans that the fast-moving observer sees time in the stationary world SLOW DOWN. But then they all
    will immediately realize that the twin paradox is what it has always been: an absurdity. And Neil deGrasse Tyson will have to sing "Lasciatemi morire":

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-VdLw7Q04Ws

    Pentcho Valev https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From patdolan@21:1/5 to Pentcho Valev on Thu May 4 12:24:22 2023
    On Thursday, May 4, 2023 at 9:04:43 AM UTC-7, Pentcho Valev wrote:
    Neil deGrasse Tyson informs his numerous fans that the fast-moving observer sees time in the stationary world SPEED UP:

    https://youtu.be/1BCkSYQ0NRQ?t=291

    Einstein's 1905 postulates, true or false, entail the opposite: the fast-moving observer sees time in the stationary world SLOW DOWN. This is easy to deduce by considering a scenario in which the fast-moving observer checks stationary clocks against
    his spaceship's clocks.

    Why is Neil deGrasse Tyson so dishonest as to abuse even special relativity's logic? He has no other choice. Imagine that he obeys logic and informs his fans that the fast-moving observer sees time in the stationary world SLOW DOWN. But then they all
    will immediately realize that the twin paradox is what it has always been: an absurdity. And Neil deGrasse Tyson will have to sing "Lasciatemi morire":

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-VdLw7Q04Ws

    Pentcho Valev https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev
    Wonderful Pentcho, wonderful! The Twins Paradox has never been conquered. Of course the symmetry of relativistic doppler out and back destroys the deGrasse defense. Does anyone recall if Einstein ever deigned to solve it? I seem to recall that he
    just let it stand and preferred to have his bulldog disciples defend against the Twins in his stead.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Pentcho Valev@21:1/5 to All on Thu May 4 16:06:59 2023
    Brian Greene teaches Einstein's original nonsense:

    https://youtu.be/-Irlq3TFr8Q?t=65

    As Gracie runs towards or away from George, she measures a frequency shift: from f=c/λ to f'=(c±v)/λ. Gracie concludes:

    This frequency shift obviously entails a speed-of-light shift: from c to c'=c±v.

    "The Doppler effect is the shift in frequency of a wave that occurs when the wave source, or the detector of the wave, is moving. Applications of the Doppler effect range from medical tests using ultrasound to radar detectors and astronomy (with
    electromagnetic waves)...Moving Observer. Let's say you, the observer, now move toward the source with velocity Vo. You encounter more waves per unit time than you did before. Relative to you, the waves travel at a higher speed: V' = V+Vo. The frequency
    of the waves you detect is higher, and is given by: f' = V'/λ = (V+Vo)/λ." http://physics.bu.edu/~redner/211-sp06/class19/class19_doppler.html

    Pentcho Valev https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Pentcho Valev@21:1/5 to All on Fri May 5 07:08:24 2023
    Brian Cox flies towards the spotlight at 0.75c and informs the gullible audience that the light hits him in the face at c, not 1.75c, and that "light travels at the same speed no matter how you look at it" was a prediction of Maxwell's 19th century
    theory:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mpw68rvF4pc

    As John Norton explains, Maxwell's 19th century theory predicted that the speed of light VARIES with the speed of the observer (Brian Cox is lying blatantly):

    John Norton: "[Maxwell's] theory allows light to slow and be frozen in the frame of reference of a sufficiently rapidly moving observer." http://www.pitt.edu/~jdnorton/papers/Chasing.pdf

    But why is John Norton, high priest in the Einstein Cult, telling the truth in this case (and in other cases as well)? Elsewhere, although not blatantly lying like Brian Cox, he is still misleading the public into believing that it was Maxwell's theory
    that gave the constancy of the speed of light:

    John Norton: "The principal reason for Einstein's acceptance of the light postulate was his lengthy study of electrodynamics, the theory of electric and magnetic fields. The theory was the most advanced physics of the time. Some 50 years before, Maxwell
    had shown that light was merely a ripple propagating in an electromagnetic field. Maxwell's theory predicted that the speed of the ripple was a quite definite number: c...That light always propagated at the same speed was a law within Maxwell's theory.
    If it held in one inertial frame of reference, it must hold in all. So, if the principle of relativity was applied to Maxwell's law about light, the light postulate resulted immediately." https://sites.pitt.edu/~jdnorton/teaching/HPS_0410/chapters/
    Special_relativity_principles/index.html

    John Norton and the late Banesh Hoffmann are the most intelligent Einsteinians I know (immeasurably more intelligent than Einstein). Ideologues of their calibre, "subtlest practitioners of doublethink", teach both lie and truth, "with the lie always one
    leap ahead of the truth":

    George Orwell: "Doublethink means the power of holding two contradictory beliefs in one's mind simultaneously, and accepting both of them. The Party intellectual knows…that he is playing tricks with reality; but by the exercise of doublethink he also
    satisfies himself that reality is not violated. The process has to be conscious, or it would not be carried out with sufficient precision, but it also has to be unconscious, or it would bring with it a feeling of falsity and hence of guilt…the
    essential act of the Party is to use conscious deception while retaining the firmness of purpose that goes with complete honesty. To tell deliberate lies while genuinely believing in them, to forget any fact that has become inconvenient, and then, when
    it becomes necessary again, to draw it back from oblivion for just so long as it is needed, to deny the existence of objective reality and all the while to take account of the reality which one denies - all this is indispensably necessary…one is
    tampering with reality; by a fresh act of doublethink one erases this knowledge ; and so on indefinitely, with the lie always one leap ahead of the truth...It need hardly be said that the subtlest practitioners of doublethink are those who invented
    doublethink and know that it is a vast system of mental cheating. In our society, those who have the best knowledge of what is happening are also those who are furthest from seeing the world as it is. In general, the greater the understanding, the
    greater the delusion ; the more intelligent, the less sane."

    Pentcho Valev https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)