Am 13.04.2023 um 09:30 schrieb Athel Cornish-Bowden:

On 2023-04-13 06:30:28 +0000, Thomas Heger said:

Am 13.04.2023 um 01:13 schrieb Pentcho Valev:
...

"Neil Degrasse Tyson on is Earth expanding with the universe?"
https://youtu.be/M6S2kyS2VT4?t=87

Clearly, there is no viable theory of expansion. Cosmologists just
fool the gullible world and eat taxpayers' money.

Pentcho Valev https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev

I have spent about ten years upon 'Growing Earth theory' and I'm
totally convinced, that the Earth is actually growing.

Just as convinced as you are that you have found 500 errors in
Einstein's paper?

Well, no. In fact the number of errors was much smaller.


With 'Growing Earth' I had dealt, because I needed an empirical proof,
that matter can be created out of nothing.

This was needed to disprove a certain paradigme of quantum mechanics
called 'Standard model' (aka 'particle concept').


I needed such a proof, because I wanted to make my alternative concept
called 'structured spacetime' more plausible.
(see here:

https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1Ur3_giuk2l439fxUa8QHX4wTDxBEaM6lOlgVUa0cFU4/edit?usp=sharing
)

Therefore, I have spent countless hours with Google Earth, looking for evidence.

I have also participated in Neal Adams' mail list group for a while.

Anyhow, I have spent a lot of time on that particular subject and am now totally convinced, that planets do in fact grow.

Now there are VERY serious problems for mainstream physicists, if they
reject growing Earth, if that is actually correct.

TH

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Am 14.04.2023 um 08:23 schrieb Thomas Heger:

Am 13.04.2023 um 09:30 schrieb Athel Cornish-Bowden:

On 2023-04-13 06:30:28 +0000, Thomas Heger said:

Am 13.04.2023 um 01:13 schrieb Pentcho Valev:
...

"Neil Degrasse Tyson on is Earth expanding with the universe?"
https://youtu.be/M6S2kyS2VT4?t=87

Clearly, there is no viable theory of expansion. Cosmologists just
fool the gullible world and eat taxpayers' money.

Pentcho Valev https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev

I have spent about ten years upon 'Growing Earth theory' and I'm
totally convinced, that the Earth is actually growing.

Just as convinced as you are that you have found 500 errors in
Einstein's paper?

Well, no. In fact the number of errors was much smaller.

With 'Growing Earth' I had dealt, because I needed an empirical proof,
that matter can be created out of nothing.

This was needed to disprove a certain paradigme of quantum mechanics
called 'Standard model' (aka 'particle concept').

I needed such a proof, because I wanted to make my alternative concept
called 'structured spacetime' more plausible.
(see here:

https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1Ur3_giuk2l439fxUa8QHX4wTDxBEaM6lOlgVUa0cFU4/edit?usp=sharing
)

Therefore, I have spent countless hours with Google Earth, looking for evidence.

I have also participated in Neal Adams' mail list group for a while.

Anyhow, I have spent a lot of time on that particular subject and am now totally convinced, that planets do in fact grow.

Now there are VERY serious problems for mainstream physicists, if they
reject growing Earth, if that is actually correct.

The problem with 'Growing Earth' is mainly, that it directly contradicts
a certain paradigme called 'materialism'.

But if this foundation of almost every single theory in many sciences
had to go, than large sections of academic sciences would fall into ruins.

So, there is good reason to reject this theory.

But nature is as nature is and that is independent of our wishes and
demands.

Therefore, science is oblidged to find valid descriptions of nature,
because invalid theories cannot help mankind in any way.


TH

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)