• Re: "Nuclear Structure from Sphere Stacking", my 2021 book

    From Archimedes Plutonium@21:1/5 to Alan Folmsbee on Tue May 2 09:20:23 2023
    Why cannot physics failure Folmsbee ever connect Kepler packing with geometry of protons and neutrons??? Much as saying the geometry of cloud cover is the geometry of Atomic interiors.

    I guess Alan sucked in and sucked up Hartford air pollution for 60 years and it is finally catching up with him.


    On Wednesday, January 12, 2022 at 2:16:39 PM UTC-6, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
    Hello physicists and physics enthusiasts.
    My book on nuclear physics is ready for you to read
    for free or for $77, your choice. If you subscribed
    to Amazon's Kindle Unlimited, the book is free. The
    paperback is $77 or the e-book is $50.

    https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0977BG1K4

    This book on the structure of the atomic nucleus uses geometry instead of algebra to describe the shape of many elements. The proton and neutron are used as spheres that are stacked into fixed locations. Integer geometries using cubes and pyramids of
    stacked spheres produce shapes of nuclei based on iron. All 118 elements are shown in silhouette in a new periodic table of the elements. This is a static nucleus theory, as opposed to older ideas, like the liquid drop model of nuclear structure.

    The author is a retired electrical engineer who discovered that this static nuclear theory provides a persuasive shape for iron. Two rings of protons are responsible for ferromagnetism of iron. Each ring has twelve protons. The two rings are coaxial.
    This confirms the ideas of Andre-Marie Ampere of the year 1820, who believed that iron bar magnets have tiny current loops in them. The book has 46 color images of models of the nuclei of many elements. Uranium is shown in complete detail, with the
    positions of every proton and every neutron revealed.

    Experimental evidence by other scientists has shown a pear-shaped nucleus for barium, radon, and radium. This book shows the theoretical shapes of those elements to match the experimental silhouettes. The neon nucleus shape also has matched the static
    nucleus theory to the shape shown using Schrödinger’s equation, provided by researchers in France and Croatia. The fission products from uranium have a bi-modal mass distribution explained by a cubic structure in the sphere stack that has 27 nucleons.
    That confirms that this theory provides answers to experimental questions.
    Eighteen rules that control nuclear structure are provided. Protons form lines of protons. All elements heavier than boron have a simple cubic lattice of spherical baryons at their centers. The six faces of the cubes are armored by stack of baryons. By
    following those rules, the charge distributions in every element are defined for the first time.
    In 84 pages, this revolutionary theory explains why nickel is ferromagnetic, but adding one more proton makes copper non-ferrous. It explains why platinum is a catalyst due to its proton’s locations forming a hook shape. Unstable elements like
    technetium and promethium are explained by showing how a four-layer cube at their centers is the cause. Carbon has a shape that causes graphite’s planar shape and then chaining of organic molecules. Chromium is anti-ferromagnetic because of the shape
    of the nucleus.

    The explanations in Nuclear Structure from Sphere Stacking do not need advanced algebra. Geometry is the appropriate branch of mathematics to describe the shapes of the elements. Quarks are not needed to explain any kind of matter. The static nucleus
    theory of the pyramidal cube is a breakthrough in theoretical physics.

    Alan Folmsbee MSEE
    Hartford, Connecticut

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Archimedes Plutonium@21:1/5 to Alan Folmsbee on Tue May 2 09:48:52 2023
    Alan Folmsbee-opinion masquerading as science. Look at his nonsense in his book-- he gives 18 rules. Which he calls rules but is actually 18 opinions.

    Alan does not know the first thing about physics science. And I suppose Electrical engineers are not forced to take logic in college-- to think straight to think clearly. Whereas at Univ Cincinnati when I went there, the lawyers had to take Symbolic
    Logic. Good on UC, ahead of its time in education!!

    Now if Alan had been required to take Logic in school, would he have avoided the mistake of thinking --- making up rules is not physics or chemistry?? Would Alan have avoided the silly stupid notion that packing fruit as Kepler Packing does not transfer
    to protons and neutrons inside a Atom? Would Alan have avoided the mistake, if he had taken logic to think straight and clear, would he have avoided Kepler packing, and perhaps as crazy as thinking that the floating of tea leaves in a pot of tea is the
    geometry of protons and neutrons??? For apparently, Alan seems to think that his opinion and models of what he sees in his kitchen is a window into the Atom's interior.

    I guess Alan sucked in and sucked up Hartford air pollution for 60 years and it is finally catching up with him. His books are a memorial to air pollution and how it wrecks a mind. If Sigmund Freud were alive today and analyzing Alan Folmsbee, Freud need
    only read a few pages of Alan's b.s.


    On Wednesday, January 12, 2022 at 2:16:39 PM UTC-6, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
    Hello physicists and physics enthusiasts.
    My book on nuclear physics is ready for you to read
    for free or for $77, your choice. If you subscribed
    to Amazon's Kindle Unlimited, the book is free. The
    paperback is $77 or the e-book is $50.

    https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0977BG1K4

    This book on the structure of the atomic nucleus uses geometry instead of algebra to describe the shape of many elements. The proton and neutron are used as spheres that are stacked into fixed locations. Integer geometries using cubes and pyramids of
    stacked spheres produce shapes of nuclei based on iron. All 118 elements are shown in silhouette in a new periodic table of the elements. This is a static nucleus theory, as opposed to older ideas, like the liquid drop model of nuclear structure.

    The author is a retired electrical engineer who discovered that this static nuclear theory provides a persuasive shape for iron. Two rings of protons are responsible for ferromagnetism of iron. Each ring has twelve protons. The two rings are coaxial.
    This confirms the ideas of Andre-Marie Ampere of the year 1820, who believed that iron bar magnets have tiny current loops in them. The book has 46 color images of models of the nuclei of many elements. Uranium is shown in complete detail, with the
    positions of every proton and every neutron revealed.

    Experimental evidence by other scientists has shown a pear-shaped nucleus for barium, radon, and radium. This book shows the theoretical shapes of those elements to match the experimental silhouettes. The neon nucleus shape also has matched the static
    nucleus theory to the shape shown using Schrödinger’s equation, provided by researchers in France and Croatia. The fission products from uranium have a bi-modal mass distribution explained by a cubic structure in the sphere stack that has 27 nucleons.
    That confirms that this theory provides answers to experimental questions.
    Eighteen rules that control nuclear structure are provided. Protons form lines of protons. All elements heavier than boron have a simple cubic lattice of spherical baryons at their centers. The six faces of the cubes are armored by stack of baryons. By
    following those rules, the charge distributions in every element are defined for the first time.
    In 84 pages, this revolutionary theory explains why nickel is ferromagnetic, but adding one more proton makes copper non-ferrous. It explains why platinum is a catalyst due to its proton’s locations forming a hook shape. Unstable elements like
    technetium and promethium are explained by showing how a four-layer cube at their centers is the cause. Carbon has a shape that causes graphite’s planar shape and then chaining of organic molecules. Chromium is anti-ferromagnetic because of the shape
    of the nucleus.

    The explanations in Nuclear Structure from Sphere Stacking do not need advanced algebra. Geometry is the appropriate branch of mathematics to describe the shapes of the elements. Quarks are not needed to explain any kind of matter. The static nucleus
    theory of the pyramidal cube is a breakthrough in theoretical physics.

    Alan Folmsbee MSEE
    Hartford, Connecticut

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Archimedes Plutonium@21:1/5 to Michael Moroney on Tue May 2 12:26:18 2023
    Folmsbee & Kibo 1 marble brains yet stacking over 100 marbles to make tin. Alan is stacking marbles superior to tea leaf reading that Kibo does with spinach???

    On Wednesday, January 12, 2022 at 3:57:13 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
    Maybe you can give it a can of spinach, like on Popeye cartoons.

    On Tuesday, May 2, 2023 at 6:11:35 AM UTC-5, Andy Everett wrote:
    Rough estimates, 1 supernova per century, "rare" but roughly 6 to 7 stars born per year, not so rare. So how does a "rare" event give rise to no so rare event? Because the rare event over time effects a relatively large volume in our galaxy.

    What would be wrong with a supernova event triggering 100 or 1000 stars
    to form? Perhaps a huge one triggering a million stars to form? We
    already know of clusters of stars in the galaxy which appear of near the
    same age as each other and their orbits indicate they started off close
    to each other in the past, even if spread out now. The Sun is in one of
    these clusters.


    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Man of Your dreams@21:1/5 to Alan Folmsbee on Thu May 4 04:00:30 2023
    My company is introducing super fast database.


    superfastdatabase.000webhostapp.com/a.html




    On Wednesday, January 12, 2022 at 10:16:39 PM UTC+2, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
    Hello physicists and physics enthusiasts.
    My book on nuclear physics is ready for you to read
    for free or for $77, your choice. If you subscribed
    to Amazon's Kindle Unlimited, the book is free. The
    paperback is $77 or the e-book is $50.

    https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0977BG1K4

    This book on the structure of the atomic nucleus uses geometry instead of algebra to describe the shape of many elements. The proton and neutron are used as spheres that are stacked into fixed locations. Integer geometries using cubes and pyramids of
    stacked spheres produce shapes of nuclei based on iron. All 118 elements are shown in silhouette in a new periodic table of the elements. This is a static nucleus theory, as opposed to older ideas, like the liquid drop model of nuclear structure.

    The author is a retired electrical engineer who discovered that this static nuclear theory provides a persuasive shape for iron. Two rings of protons are responsible for ferromagnetism of iron. Each ring has twelve protons. The two rings are coaxial.
    This confirms the ideas of Andre-Marie Ampere of the year 1820, who believed that iron bar magnets have tiny current loops in them. The book has 46 color images of models of the nuclei of many elements. Uranium is shown in complete detail, with the
    positions of every proton and every neutron revealed.

    Experimental evidence by other scientists has shown a pear-shaped nucleus for barium, radon, and radium. This book shows the theoretical shapes of those elements to match the experimental silhouettes. The neon nucleus shape also has matched the static
    nucleus theory to the shape shown using Schrödinger’s equation, provided by researchers in France and Croatia. The fission products from uranium have a bi-modal mass distribution explained by a cubic structure in the sphere stack that has 27 nucleons.
    That confirms that this theory provides answers to experimental questions.
    Eighteen rules that control nuclear structure are provided. Protons form lines of protons. All elements heavier than boron have a simple cubic lattice of spherical baryons at their centers. The six faces of the cubes are armored by stack of baryons. By
    following those rules, the charge distributions in every element are defined for the first time.
    In 84 pages, this revolutionary theory explains why nickel is ferromagnetic, but adding one more proton makes copper non-ferrous. It explains why platinum is a catalyst due to its proton’s locations forming a hook shape. Unstable elements like
    technetium and promethium are explained by showing how a four-layer cube at their centers is the cause. Carbon has a shape that causes graphite’s planar shape and then chaining of organic molecules. Chromium is anti-ferromagnetic because of the shape
    of the nucleus.

    The explanations in Nuclear Structure from Sphere Stacking do not need advanced algebra. Geometry is the appropriate branch of mathematics to describe the shapes of the elements. Quarks are not needed to explain any kind of matter. The static nucleus
    theory of the pyramidal cube is a breakthrough in theoretical physics.

    Alan Folmsbee MSEE
    Hartford, Connecticut

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Man of Your dreams@21:1/5 to Michael Moroney on Thu May 4 04:00:47 2023
    My company is introducing super fast database.


    superfastdatabase.000webhostapp.com/a.html




    On Wednesday, January 12, 2022 at 11:57:13 PM UTC+2, Michael Moroney wrote:
    On 1/12/2022 3:49 PM, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:

    If the Weak force is with all atoms nucleus's why does it not split every atom?
    Because it's too weak to do so!

    Maybe you can give it a can of spinach, like on Popeye cartoons.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Enes Richard@21:1/5 to All on Thu May 4 04:54:36 2023
    środa, 12 stycznia 2022 o 21:16:39 UTC+1 Alan Folmsbee napisał(a):
    Hello physicists and physics enthusiasts.
    My book on nuclear physics is ready for you to read
    for free or for $77, your choice. If you subscribed
    to Amazon's Kindle Unlimited, the book is free. The
    paperback is $77 or the e-book is $50.

    https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0977BG1K4

    This book on the structure of the atomic nucleus uses geometry instead of algebra to describe the shape of many elements. The proton and neutron are used as spheres that are stacked into fixed locations. Integer geometries using cubes and pyramids of
    stacked spheres produce shapes of nuclei based on iron. All 118 elements are shown in silhouette in a new periodic table of the elements. This is a static nucleus theory, as opposed to older ideas, like the liquid drop model of nuclear structure.

    The author is a retired electrical engineer who discovered that this static nuclear theory provides a persuasive shape for iron. Two rings of protons are responsible for ferromagnetism of iron. Each ring has twelve protons. The two rings are coaxial.
    This confirms the ideas of Andre-Marie Ampere of the year 1820, who believed that iron bar magnets have tiny current loops in them. The book has 46 color images of models of the nuclei of many elements. Uranium is shown in complete detail, with the
    positions of every proton and every neutron revealed.

    Experimental evidence by other scientists has shown a pear-shaped nucleus for barium, radon, and radium. This book shows the theoretical shapes of those elements to match the experimental silhouettes. The neon nucleus shape also has matched the static
    nucleus theory to the shape shown using Schrödinger’s equation, provided by researchers in France and Croatia. The fission products from uranium have a bi-modal mass distribution explained by a cubic structure in the sphere stack that has 27 nucleons.
    That confirms that this theory provides answers to experimental questions.
    Eighteen rules that control nuclear structure are provided. Protons form lines of protons. All elements heavier than boron have a simple cubic lattice of spherical baryons at their centers. The six faces of the cubes are armored by stack of baryons. By
    following those rules, the charge distributions in every element are defined for the first time.
    In 84 pages, this revolutionary theory explains why nickel is ferromagnetic, but adding one more proton makes copper non-ferrous. It explains why platinum is a catalyst due to its proton’s locations forming a hook shape. Unstable elements like
    technetium and promethium are explained by showing how a four-layer cube at their centers is the cause. Carbon has a shape that causes graphite’s planar shape and then chaining of organic molecules. Chromium is anti-ferromagnetic because of the shape
    of the nucleus.

    The explanations in Nuclear Structure from Sphere Stacking do not need advanced algebra. Geometry is the appropriate branch of mathematics to describe the shapes of the elements. Quarks are not needed to explain any kind of matter. The static nucleus
    theory of the pyramidal cube is a breakthrough in theoretical physics.

    Alan Folmsbee MSEE
    Hartford, Connecticut

    Are there still (as in the standard model) unnecessary entities in your atomic nuclei:
    weak and strong nuclear forces, mass deficit?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Enes Richard@21:1/5 to All on Thu May 4 05:55:57 2023
    czwartek, 13 stycznia 2022 o 17:37:38 UTC+1 Alan Folmsbee napisał(a):
    On Wednesday, January 12, 2022 at 3:49:53 PM UTC-5, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Wednesday, January 12, 2022 at 12:16:39 PM UTC-8, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
    Hello physicists and physics enthusiasts.
    My book on nuclear physics is ready for you to read
    for free or for $77, your choice. If you subscribed
    to Amazon's Kindle Unlimited, the book is free. The
    paperback is $77 or the e-book is $50.

    https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0977BG1K4

    This book on the structure of the atomic nucleus uses geometry instead of algebra to describe the shape of many elements. The proton and neutron are used as spheres that are stacked into fixed locations. Integer geometries using cubes and pyramids
    of stacked spheres produce shapes of nuclei based on iron. All 118 elements are shown in silhouette in a new periodic table of the elements. This is a static nucleus theory, as opposed to older ideas, like the liquid drop model of nuclear structure.

    The author is a retired electrical engineer who discovered that this static nuclear theory provides a persuasive shape for iron. Two rings of protons are responsible for ferromagnetism of iron. Each ring has twelve protons. The two rings are
    coaxial. This confirms the ideas of Andre-Marie Ampere of the year 1820, who believed that iron bar magnets have tiny current loops in them. The book has 46 color images of models of the nuclei of many elements. Uranium is shown in complete detail, with
    the positions of every proton and every neutron revealed.

    Experimental evidence by other scientists has shown a pear-shaped nucleus for barium, radon, and radium. This book shows the theoretical shapes of those elements to match the experimental silhouettes. The neon nucleus shape also has matched the
    static nucleus theory to the shape shown using Schrödinger’s equation, provided by researchers in France and Croatia. The fission products from uranium have a bi-modal mass distribution explained by a cubic structure in the sphere stack that has 27
    nucleons. That confirms that this theory provides answers to experimental questions.
    Eighteen rules that control nuclear structure are provided. Protons form lines of protons. All elements heavier than boron have a simple cubic lattice of spherical baryons at their centers. The six faces of the cubes are armored by stack of baryons.
    By following those rules, the charge distributions in every element are defined for the first time.
    In 84 pages, this revolutionary theory explains why nickel is ferromagnetic, but adding one more proton makes copper non-ferrous. It explains why platinum is a catalyst due to its proton’s locations forming a hook shape. Unstable elements like
    technetium and promethium are explained by showing how a four-layer cube at their centers is the cause. Carbon has a shape that causes graphite’s planar shape and then chaining of organic molecules. Chromium is anti-ferromagnetic because of the shape
    of the nucleus.

    The explanations in Nuclear Structure from Sphere Stacking do not need advanced algebra. Geometry is the appropriate branch of mathematics to describe the shapes of the elements. Quarks are not needed to explain any kind of matter. The static
    nucleus theory of the pyramidal cube is a breakthrough in theoretical physics.

    Alan Folmsbee MSEE
    Hartford, Connecticut
    The nucleus has its own time dilation with its atomic kinetic energy.
    If the Weak force is with all atoms nucleus's why does it not split every atom?

    Mitchell Raemsch
    Dear Mitch,
    I do not promote the Weak Force, but time dilation is important to the Strong Nuclear Force.
    Near the gaps between protons and neutrons, time grows out of matter as space drains in.
    It is the conservation of continuum.
    The time is thicker as it exits the nucleus, because the gaps are smaller than the
    surfaces of the nucleons. Time , near a nucleus has derivatives much higher than for
    gravity's acceleration. Acceleration of gravity uses the second time derivative.
    The fourth time derivative is important near a nucleus, so gravity is the strong nuclear force.
    Alan Folmsbee

    There are probably only 3 interactions at all: attraction, repulsion, and equilibrium.
    Gravity and electromagnetism have historical significance.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Enes Richard@21:1/5 to All on Thu May 4 05:31:32 2023
    środa, 12 stycznia 2022 o 21:49:53 UTC+1 mitchr...@gmail.com napisał(a):
    On Wednesday, January 12, 2022 at 12:16:39 PM UTC-8, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
    Hello physicists and physics enthusiasts.
    My book on nuclear physics is ready for you to read
    for free or for $77, your choice. If you subscribed
    to Amazon's Kindle Unlimited, the book is free. The
    paperback is $77 or the e-book is $50.

    https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0977BG1K4

    This book on the structure of the atomic nucleus uses geometry instead of algebra to describe the shape of many elements. The proton and neutron are used as spheres that are stacked into fixed locations. Integer geometries using cubes and pyramids of
    stacked spheres produce shapes of nuclei based on iron. All 118 elements are shown in silhouette in a new periodic table of the elements. This is a static nucleus theory, as opposed to older ideas, like the liquid drop model of nuclear structure.

    The author is a retired electrical engineer who discovered that this static nuclear theory provides a persuasive shape for iron. Two rings of protons are responsible for ferromagnetism of iron. Each ring has twelve protons. The two rings are coaxial.
    This confirms the ideas of Andre-Marie Ampere of the year 1820, who believed that iron bar magnets have tiny current loops in them. The book has 46 color images of models of the nuclei of many elements. Uranium is shown in complete detail, with the
    positions of every proton and every neutron revealed.

    Experimental evidence by other scientists has shown a pear-shaped nucleus for barium, radon, and radium. This book shows the theoretical shapes of those elements to match the experimental silhouettes. The neon nucleus shape also has matched the
    static nucleus theory to the shape shown using Schrödinger’s equation, provided by researchers in France and Croatia. The fission products from uranium have a bi-modal mass distribution explained by a cubic structure in the sphere stack that has 27
    nucleons. That confirms that this theory provides answers to experimental questions.
    Eighteen rules that control nuclear structure are provided. Protons form lines of protons. All elements heavier than boron have a simple cubic lattice of spherical baryons at their centers. The six faces of the cubes are armored by stack of baryons.
    By following those rules, the charge distributions in every element are defined for the first time.
    In 84 pages, this revolutionary theory explains why nickel is ferromagnetic, but adding one more proton makes copper non-ferrous. It explains why platinum is a catalyst due to its proton’s locations forming a hook shape. Unstable elements like
    technetium and promethium are explained by showing how a four-layer cube at their centers is the cause. Carbon has a shape that causes graphite’s planar shape and then chaining of organic molecules. Chromium is anti-ferromagnetic because of the shape
    of the nucleus.

    The explanations in Nuclear Structure from Sphere Stacking do not need advanced algebra. Geometry is the appropriate branch of mathematics to describe the shapes of the elements. Quarks are not needed to explain any kind of matter. The static nucleus
    theory of the pyramidal cube is a breakthrough in theoretical physics.

    Alan Folmsbee MSEE
    Hartford, Connecticut
    The nucleus has its own time dilation with its atomic kinetic energy.
    If the Weak force is with all atoms nucleus's why does it not split every atom?

    Mitchell Raemsch

    Rightly so, the same atoms should decay almost simultaneously, like neutrons and even antineutrons in one beam.

    Meanwhile, some atoms are affected by weak forces, and others manage
    to avoid these interactions. There are half-lifes...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan Folmsbee@21:1/5 to Enes Richard on Thu May 4 10:44:46 2023
    On Thursday, May 4, 2023 at 8:56:00 AM UTC-4, Enes Richard wrote:
    There are probably only 3 interactions at all: attraction, repulsion, and equilibrium.
    Gravity and electromagnetism have historical significance.

    The strong nuclear force can be gravity.
    Electrons are repelled by a proton at short range but
    attracted by a proton at long range.
    Equilibrium happens near The Atomic Scale Formula
    distance: 241 picometers = R

    R = m/r*alpha = q/4*pi*a

    m is proton mass, r = proton gravitational radius (0.95fm)
    q = proton charge, a = Bohr radius

    See page 526 of my book
    "Charge distributions on the nuclei"
    https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BMDMHVFX

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Archimedes Plutonium@21:1/5 to Alan Folmsbee on Fri May 5 11:51:25 2023
    Alan, when I stack Kumquats and they fall apart, is that why neon never bonds to oxygen??? Alan Folmsbee, an utter moron of physics who thinks there is a connection of stacking with the architecture of Atomic interiors.

    On Thursday, May 4, 2023 at 12:44:49 PM UTC-5, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
    On Thursday, May 4, 2023 at 8:56:00 AM UTC-4, Enes Richard wrote:
    There are probably only 3 interactions at all: attraction, repulsion, and equilibrium.
    Gravity and electromagnetism have historical significance.
    The strong nuclear force can be gravity.
    Electrons are repelled by a proton at short range but
    attracted by a proton at long range.
    Equilibrium happens near The Atomic Scale Formula
    distance: 241 picometers = R

    R = m/r*alpha = q/4*pi*a

    m is proton mass, r = proton gravitational radius (0.95fm)
    q = proton charge, a = Bohr radius

    See page 526 of my book
    "Charge distributions on the nuclei"
    https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BMDMHVFX

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Enes Richard@21:1/5 to All on Fri May 5 12:40:14 2023
    czwartek, 4 maja 2023 o 19:44:49 UTC+2 Alan Folmsbee napisał(a):
    On Thursday, May 4, 2023 at 8:56:00 AM UTC-4, Enes Richard wrote:
    There are probably only 3 interactions at all: attraction, repulsion, and equilibrium.
    Gravity and electromagnetism have historical significance.
    The strong nuclear force can be gravity.
    Electrons are repelled by a proton at short range but
    attracted by a proton at long range.
    Equilibrium happens near The Atomic Scale Formula
    distance: 241 picometers = R

    R = m/r*alpha = q/4*pi*a

    m is proton mass, r = proton gravitational radius (0.95fm)
    q = proton charge, a = Bohr radius

    See page 526 of my book
    "Charge distributions on the nuclei"
    https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BMDMHVFX


    Two protons - at what distance is the equilibrium between gravitational attraction and electrostatic repulsion?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Archimedes Plutonium@21:1/5 to Alan Folmsbee on Fri May 5 14:55:43 2023
    Alan, when I stack Kumquats and they fall apart, is that why neon never bonds to oxygen??? Alan Folmsbee, an utter moron of physics who thinks there is a connection of stacking with the architecture of Atomic interiors.


    On Thursday, May 4, 2023 at 12:44:49 PM UTC-5, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
    On Thursday, May 4, 2023 at 8:56:00 AM UTC-4, Enes Richard wrote:
    There are probably only 3 interactions at all: attraction, repulsion, and equilibrium.
    Gravity and electromagnetism have historical significance.
    The strong nuclear force can be gravity.
    Electrons are repelled by a proton at short range but
    attracted by a proton at long range.
    Equilibrium happens near The Atomic Scale Formula
    distance: 241 picometers = R

    R = m/r*alpha = q/4*pi*a

    m is proton mass, r = proton gravitational radius (0.95fm)
    q = proton charge, a = Bohr radius

    See page 526 of my book


    Alan, when I stack fruitcake with bananas with flapjack pancakes does this imitate the sulfur bond in silicon and causes breakage when dropped on concrete floor.

    You know Alan, you really are a fruitcake of Logic

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Archimedes Plutonium@21:1/5 to All on Fri May 5 15:26:09 2023
    When talking to mindless idiots of physics, you would want to talk some logical sense into them.

    But rarely does Logical Commonsense penetrate that idiot mind of a physics moron.

    For instance, the idea that stacking is reflective of the structure and architecture of the inside of Atoms, is what Alan Folmsbee book writing is about.

    So, if Alan Folmsbee had a single marble of a brain of intelligence, his first page of any book on this topic would be to tell the reader-- how in the hell stacking is related to Atomic structure.

    Not the moron Alan Folmsbee-- his first pages are a list of mindless rules he concocts out of thin air. So he wastes his time and the time of everyone else with his spam in sci.physics.

    And this is the awful fact that most people have little to no logical marbles to be able to even step foot in science; they cannot reason; they cannot think straight or clear; they never take Logic in school.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Enes Richard@21:1/5 to All on Sat May 6 10:47:44 2023
    sobota, 6 maja 2023 o 00:26:13 UTC+2 Archimedes Plutonium napisał(a):
    When talking to mindless idiots of physics, you would want to talk some logical sense into them.

    But rarely does Logical Commonsense penetrate that idiot mind of a physics moron.

    For instance, the idea that stacking is reflective of the structure and architecture of the inside of Atoms, is what Alan Folmsbee book writing is about.

    So, if Alan Folmsbee had a single marble of a brain of intelligence, his first page of any book on this topic would be to tell the reader-- how in the hell stacking is related to Atomic structure.

    Not the moron Alan Folmsbee-- his first pages are a list of mindless rules he concocts out of thin air. So he wastes his time and the time of everyone else with his spam in sci.physics.

    And this is the awful fact that most people have little to no logical marbles to be able to even step foot in science; they cannot reason; they cannot think straight or clear; they never take Logic in school.

    We will see the answer regarding the equality of forces for 2 protons (the same is true for 2 electrons).

    Interesting conclusions flow especially in the natural system of Planck units (which is supposedly used even by aliens!),
    which should lead to even greater simplification of the system (used by the creators of aliens ;)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)