• Re: Frames only have unsteady motion

    From Jim Pennino@21:1/5 to mitchr...@gmail.com on Wed Jan 31 14:34:16 2024
    mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> wrote:
    There is no real world example of an inertial frame.
    Identify an example we can see.
    If you could get to an unobservable frame far out
    in space it would still be subject to escape velocity
    changing its speed. On Earth friction shows no
    examples of a real world inertial frame.
    Motions happen also in more than one way.
    All levels of motion are unsteady.
    Einstein's definition of an inertial frame
    steady motion does not apply anywhere.
    It is an oversimplification.

    Moronic babble.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Pennino@21:1/5 to mitchr...@gmail.com on Thu Feb 1 11:25:12 2024
    mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Wednesday, January 31, 2024 at 2:46:09 PM UTC-8, Jim Pennino wrote:
    mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchr...@gmail.com> wrote:
    There is no real world example of an inertial frame.
    Identify an example we can see.
    If you could get to an unobservable frame far out
    in space it would still be subject to escape velocity
    changing its speed. On Earth friction shows no
    examples of a real world inertial frame.
    Motions happen also in more than one way.
    All levels of motion are unsteady.
    Einstein's definition of an inertial frame
    steady motion does not apply anywhere.
    It is an oversimplification.
    Moronic babble.

    Where Einstein defined steady motion it does not apply
    because of escape velocity acting on changing speed all frame.

    Moronic, babbling gibberish.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)