Does the polls say who are the dead people voting for?
I mean, dead people do vote, right? Just...who are they voting for?
On 1/9/2024 2:38 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
Does the polls say who are the dead people voting for?
I mean, dead people do vote, right? Just...who are they voting for?
I haven't seen the polls mentioned them.
I know the electoral roll hasn't been updated so that means
the same dead people who voted in the last election will
be voting again...just, i want to know who is their favorite candidate?
Do dead people vote by mail or do they
stuffing ballot boxes at night?
Just in case yous people don't know how many registered dead people
there are...
1.8 million.
How To Rig an Election, Again!
Voter Suppression: This involves efforts to reduce the number of eligible voters or make it difficult for certain groups to vote. Tactics may include restrictive voter ID laws, purging voter rolls, and limiting polling place accessibility.
Gerrymandering: Manipulating the boundaries of electoral districts
to favor one political party over another. This can lead to a disproportionate representation of certain groups and undermine the principle of equal representation.
Fraudulent Voter Registration: Illegitimate registration of voters
or manipulation of voter registration records to create fictitious
voters or exclude legitimate ones.
Intimidation and Violence: Coercive tactics, such as physical
violence or threats, to discourage voters from supporting a particular candidate or party.
Media Manipulation: Controlling or influencing media coverage to
favor one candidate or party over others. This can include biased reporting, censorship, or spreading misinformation.
Vote Buying: Offering material incentives or direct payments to
voters in exchange for their votes, undermining the principle of voting based on informed choice.
Manipulation of Ballot Design: Designing ballots in a way that confuses or misleads voters, potentially leading to unintentional errors
in voting.
Hacking and Cyber Interference: Tampering with electronic voting systems, hacking political party databases, or spreading disinformation online to influence public opinion.
Abuse of State Resources: Using government resources, such as public funds or state-controlled media, to benefit a specific candidate or
party.
Misuse of Proxy Voting: Allowing voters to cast ballots on behalf of others without proper authorization, leading to potential abuse.
Voter Roll Manipulation: Purposely adding or removing voters from
the electoral roll to influence the demographic composition of the electorate.
Election Funding Irregularities: Improper use or manipulation of campaign finances, including accepting illegal campaign contributions,
to gain an unfair advantage.
Suppression of Independent Monitoring: Restricting the activities of independent election observers, both domestic and international, who
play a crucial role in ensuring transparency and fairness.
Biased Election Administration: Appointing partisan officials to key positions in electoral commissions, potentially leading to biased decision-making and compromised election administration.
Dual Voting: Exploiting weaknesses in voter identification systems
to allow individuals to vote multiple times using different identities.
Infiltration of Political Parties: Infiltrating political parties or campaigns to gather information or disrupt operations from within.
Misuse of Absentee Voting: Manipulating the process of absentee or mail-in voting, including coercion or interception of ballots.
Ethnic and Religious Polarization: Exploiting existing tensions between different ethnic or religious groups to sway votes along
identity lines.
Election Timing Manipulation: Choosing specific election dates to strategically benefit one party or disadvantage another, such as
scheduling elections during a time of crisis for political gain.
Inadequate Electoral Laws: Designing or maintaining electoral laws that lack clarity, making it easier to exploit legal loopholes and
engage in questionable practices.
Fake News and Disinformation Campaigns: Spreading false information through traditional media, social media, or other channels to influence public opinion and sway voters.
Strategic Candidate Withdrawal: Coordinating the withdrawal of
certain candidates to consolidate support behind a preferred candidate
and strategically alter the electoral landscape.
Election Day Irregularities: Deliberately creating chaos or disruptions on election day to discourage voter turnout or cast doubt on the legitimacy of the process.
Misuse of Postal Votes: Manipulating the handling of postal votes, including tampering with mail-in ballots or coercing voters to submit fraudulent postal votes.
Partisan Polling Stations: Placing polling stations in locations favorable to a specific candidate or party, or intentionally creating
long wait times in areas that are less supportive.
Foreign Interference: Involvement by foreign entities in an attempt
to influence or manipulate election outcomes, including cyberattacks, disinformation campaigns, or financial support.
Selective Law Enforcement: Using law enforcement selectively to
target opposition candidates or parties, creating an uneven playing
field.
Disqualification of Opposition Candidates: Employing legal or administrative mechanisms to disqualify opposition candidates on questionable grounds.
Controlled Opposition: Supporting or creating pseudo-opposition parties to divide the opposition vote and prevent a unified challenge.
Voter Apathy Promotion: Discrediting the electoral process to foster
a sense of disillusionment and apathy among potential voters.
Election Boycotts: Encouraging or orchestrating a boycott of the election to undermine its legitimacy.
Co-option of Electoral Officials: Ensuring that election officials
are sympathetic to a particular candidate or party, compromising the impartiality of the electoral process.
Influencing Candidate Nominations: Manipulating the candidate nomination process to exclude strong competitors or ensure weaker opponents.
Selective Voter Education: Providing biased or incomplete
information to voters to manipulate their understanding of candidates, issues, or the electoral process.
Manipulation of Election Results: Tampering with the counting and reporting of votes to produce inaccurate or fraudulent results.
Election Infrastructure Sabotage: Physically damaging or disrupting election infrastructure, such as polling stations or electronic voting systems.
Use of Political Bots: Employing automated social media accounts or bots to amplify certain narratives, drown out opposition voices, or manipulate online discussions.
Identity Politics Exploitation: Manipulating identity-based issues
to create divisions among voters and consolidate support within specific demographics.
Selective Voter Mobilization: Targeting specific demographics for voter mobilization efforts while neglecting others to manipulate turnout
in favor of a particular candidate or party.
Unfair Access to Media: Providing unequal access to media coverage, debates, or advertising opportunities, giving an advantage to one
candidate or party.
Subtle Voter Intimidation: Rather than overt threats, using subtle forms of intimidation, such as anonymous messages or veiled warnings, to discourage voters from supporting a particular candidate.
Selective Provision of Public Goods: Leveraging control over public resources to selectively provide benefits or services to areas that
support a specific candidate or party, influencing voter sentiment.
Strategic Timing of Government Announcements: Timing the release of positive government news or policy announcements close to the election
to influence voter perceptions and sway opinions.
Social Pressure Tactics: Encouraging social norms that favor a particular candidate or party, making voters feel pressured to conform
to the perceived majority opinion.
Cooptation of Civil Society: Infiltrating or co-opting independent civil society organizations to manipulate public discourse and influence voter attitudes.
Infiltration of Opposition Camps: Placing moles or agents within opposition parties to gather information, sow discord, or disrupt their strategies.
Election Observation Manipulation: Faking or manipulating the
presence of international election observers to create a false
appearance of a transparent and fair electoral process.
Strategic Candidate Replacement: Substituting a candidate at a critical point in the election process to exploit legal loopholes or
gain a tactical advantage.
Financial Market Manipulation: Creating or exploiting economic uncertainties to influence voter behavior and perceptions, potentially using financial markets as a tool.
Manufactured Issue Amplification: Creating or exaggerating specific issues to divert attention from critical matters, manipulate public discourse, and influence voter priorities.
i almost forgot...a USB stick.
In USA you can have your men stand by the booths to club people who
don't vote for your preferred candidate. You should know that! Al Capone
did it all the time. Other mob bosses did that too. It was one of the
ways they collected "revenue" from the "billionaires" of their times.
Does the polls say who are the dead people voting for?
I mean, dead people do vote, right? Just...who are they voting for?
I haven't seen the polls mentioned them.
I know the electoral roll hasn't been updated so that means
the same dead people who voted in the last election will
be voting again...just, i want to know who is their favorite candidate?
Do dead people vote by mail or do they
stuffing ballot boxes at night?
Just in case yous people don't know how many registered dead people
there are...
1.8 million.
How To Rig an Election, Again!
Voter Suppression: This involves efforts to reduce the number of
eligible voters or make it difficult for certain groups to vote. Tactics
may include restrictive voter ID laws, purging voter rolls, and limiting polling place accessibility.
Gerrymandering: Manipulating the boundaries of electoral districts
to favor one political party over another. This can lead to a disproportionate representation of certain groups and undermine the
principle of equal representation.
Fraudulent Voter Registration: Illegitimate registration of voters
or manipulation of voter registration records to create fictitious
voters or exclude legitimate ones.
Intimidation and Violence: Coercive tactics, such as physical
violence or threats, to discourage voters from supporting a particular candidate or party.
Media Manipulation: Controlling or influencing media coverage to
favor one candidate or party over others. This can include biased
reporting, censorship, or spreading misinformation.
Vote Buying: Offering material incentives or direct payments to
voters in exchange for their votes, undermining the principle of voting
based on informed choice.
Manipulation of Ballot Design: Designing ballots in a way that
confuses or misleads voters, potentially leading to unintentional errors
in voting.
Hacking and Cyber Interference: Tampering with electronic voting
systems, hacking political party databases, or spreading disinformation online to influence public opinion.
Abuse of State Resources: Using government resources, such as public funds or state-controlled media, to benefit a specific candidate or
party.
Misuse of Proxy Voting: Allowing voters to cast ballots on behalf of others without proper authorization, leading to potential abuse.
Voter Roll Manipulation: Purposely adding or removing voters from
the electoral roll to influence the demographic composition of the electorate.
Election Funding Irregularities: Improper use or manipulation of
campaign finances, including accepting illegal campaign contributions,
to gain an unfair advantage.
Suppression of Independent Monitoring: Restricting the activities of independent election observers, both domestic and international, who
play a crucial role in ensuring transparency and fairness.
Biased Election Administration: Appointing partisan officials to key positions in electoral commissions, potentially leading to biased decision-making and compromised election administration.
Dual Voting: Exploiting weaknesses in voter identification systems
to allow individuals to vote multiple times using different identities.
Infiltration of Political Parties: Infiltrating political parties or campaigns to gather information or disrupt operations from within.
Misuse of Absentee Voting: Manipulating the process of absentee or mail-in voting, including coercion or interception of ballots.
Ethnic and Religious Polarization: Exploiting existing tensions
between different ethnic or religious groups to sway votes along
identity lines.
Election Timing Manipulation: Choosing specific election dates to strategically benefit one party or disadvantage another, such as
scheduling elections during a time of crisis for political gain.
Inadequate Electoral Laws: Designing or maintaining electoral laws
that lack clarity, making it easier to exploit legal loopholes and
engage in questionable practices.
Fake News and Disinformation Campaigns: Spreading false information through traditional media, social media, or other channels to influence public opinion and sway voters.
Strategic Candidate Withdrawal: Coordinating the withdrawal of
certain candidates to consolidate support behind a preferred candidate
and strategically alter the electoral landscape.
Election Day Irregularities: Deliberately creating chaos or
disruptions on election day to discourage voter turnout or cast doubt on
the legitimacy of the process.
Misuse of Postal Votes: Manipulating the handling of postal votes, including tampering with mail-in ballots or coercing voters to submit fraudulent postal votes.
Partisan Polling Stations: Placing polling stations in locations favorable to a specific candidate or party, or intentionally creating
long wait times in areas that are less supportive.
Foreign Interference: Involvement by foreign entities in an attempt
to influence or manipulate election outcomes, including cyberattacks, disinformation campaigns, or financial support.
Selective Law Enforcement: Using law enforcement selectively to
target opposition candidates or parties, creating an uneven playing
field.
Disqualification of Opposition Candidates: Employing legal or administrative mechanisms to disqualify opposition candidates on
questionable grounds.
Controlled Opposition: Supporting or creating pseudo-opposition
parties to divide the opposition vote and prevent a unified challenge.
Voter Apathy Promotion: Discrediting the electoral process to foster
a sense of disillusionment and apathy among potential voters.
Election Boycotts: Encouraging or orchestrating a boycott of the
election to undermine its legitimacy.
Co-option of Electoral Officials: Ensuring that election officials
are sympathetic to a particular candidate or party, compromising the impartiality of the electoral process.
Influencing Candidate Nominations: Manipulating the candidate
nomination process to exclude strong competitors or ensure weaker
opponents.
Selective Voter Education: Providing biased or incomplete
information to voters to manipulate their understanding of candidates, issues, or the electoral process.
Manipulation of Election Results: Tampering with the counting and reporting of votes to produce inaccurate or fraudulent results.
Election Infrastructure Sabotage: Physically damaging or disrupting election infrastructure, such as polling stations or electronic voting systems.
Use of Political Bots: Employing automated social media accounts or
bots to amplify certain narratives, drown out opposition voices, or manipulate online discussions.
Identity Politics Exploitation: Manipulating identity-based issues
to create divisions among voters and consolidate support within specific demographics.
Selective Voter Mobilization: Targeting specific demographics for
voter mobilization efforts while neglecting others to manipulate turnout
in favor of a particular candidate or party.
Unfair Access to Media: Providing unequal access to media coverage, debates, or advertising opportunities, giving an advantage to one
candidate or party.
Subtle Voter Intimidation: Rather than overt threats, using subtle forms of intimidation, such as anonymous messages or veiled warnings, to discourage voters from supporting a particular candidate.
Selective Provision of Public Goods: Leveraging control over public resources to selectively provide benefits or services to areas that
support a specific candidate or party, influencing voter sentiment.
Strategic Timing of Government Announcements: Timing the release of positive government news or policy announcements close to the election
to influence voter perceptions and sway opinions.
Social Pressure Tactics: Encouraging social norms that favor a
particular candidate or party, making voters feel pressured to conform
to the perceived majority opinion.
Cooptation of Civil Society: Infiltrating or co-opting independent
civil society organizations to manipulate public discourse and influence voter attitudes.
Infiltration of Opposition Camps: Placing moles or agents within opposition parties to gather information, sow discord, or disrupt their strategies.
Election Observation Manipulation: Faking or manipulating the
presence of international election observers to create a false
appearance of a transparent and fair electoral process.
Strategic Candidate Replacement: Substituting a candidate at a
critical point in the election process to exploit legal loopholes or
gain a tactical advantage.
Financial Market Manipulation: Creating or exploiting economic uncertainties to influence voter behavior and perceptions, potentially
using financial markets as a tool.
Manufactured Issue Amplification: Creating or exaggerating specific issues to divert attention from critical matters, manipulate public discourse, and influence voter priorities.
i almost forgot...a USB stick.
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.
Physfitfreak wrote:
On 1/9/2024 2:38 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
Does the polls say who are the dead people voting for?
I mean, dead people do vote, right? Just...who are they voting for?
I haven't seen the polls mentioned them.
I know the electoral roll hasn't been updated so that means
the same dead people who voted in the last election will
be voting again...just, i want to know who is their favorite candidate?
Do dead people vote by mail or do they
stuffing ballot boxes at night?
Just in case yous people don't know how many registered dead people
there are...
1.8 million.
How To Rig an Election, Again!
Voter Suppression: This involves efforts to reduce the number of eligible voters or make it difficult for certain groups to vote. Tactics may include restrictive voter ID laws, purging voter rolls, and limiting polling place accessibility.
Gerrymandering: Manipulating the boundaries of electoral districts to favor one political party over another. This can lead to a disproportionate representation of certain groups and undermine the principle of equal representation.
Fraudulent Voter Registration: Illegitimate registration of voters or manipulation of voter registration records to create fictitious
voters or exclude legitimate ones.
Intimidation and Violence: Coercive tactics, such as physical violence or threats, to discourage voters from supporting a particular candidate or party.
Media Manipulation: Controlling or influencing media coverage to favor one candidate or party over others. This can include biased reporting, censorship, or spreading misinformation.
Vote Buying: Offering material incentives or direct payments to voters in exchange for their votes, undermining the principle of voting based on informed choice.
Manipulation of Ballot Design: Designing ballots in a way that confuses or misleads voters, potentially leading to unintentional errors in voting.
Hacking and Cyber Interference: Tampering with electronic voting systems, hacking political party databases, or spreading disinformation online to influence public opinion.
Abuse of State Resources: Using government resources, such as public funds or state-controlled media, to benefit a specific candidate or party.
Misuse of Proxy Voting: Allowing voters to cast ballots on behalf of others without proper authorization, leading to potential abuse.
Voter Roll Manipulation: Purposely adding or removing voters from the electoral roll to influence the demographic composition of the electorate.
Election Funding Irregularities: Improper use or manipulation of campaign finances, including accepting illegal campaign contributions,
to gain an unfair advantage.
Suppression of Independent Monitoring: Restricting the activities of independent election observers, both domestic and international, who
play a crucial role in ensuring transparency and fairness.
Biased Election Administration: Appointing partisan officials to key positions in electoral commissions, potentially leading to biased decision-making and compromised election administration.
Dual Voting: Exploiting weaknesses in voter identification systems to allow individuals to vote multiple times using different identities.
Infiltration of Political Parties: Infiltrating political parties or campaigns to gather information or disrupt operations from within.
Misuse of Absentee Voting: Manipulating the process of absentee or mail-in voting, including coercion or interception of ballots.
Ethnic and Religious Polarization: Exploiting existing tensions between different ethnic or religious groups to sway votes along
identity lines.
Election Timing Manipulation: Choosing specific election dates to strategically benefit one party or disadvantage another, such as scheduling elections during a time of crisis for political gain.
Inadequate Electoral Laws: Designing or maintaining electoral laws that lack clarity, making it easier to exploit legal loopholes and
engage in questionable practices.
Fake News and Disinformation Campaigns: Spreading false information through traditional media, social media, or other channels to influence public opinion and sway voters.
Strategic Candidate Withdrawal: Coordinating the withdrawal of certain candidates to consolidate support behind a preferred candidate and strategically alter the electoral landscape.
Election Day Irregularities: Deliberately creating chaos or disruptions on election day to discourage voter turnout or cast doubt on the legitimacy of the process.
Misuse of Postal Votes: Manipulating the handling of postal votes, including tampering with mail-in ballots or coercing voters to submit fraudulent postal votes.
Partisan Polling Stations: Placing polling stations in locations favorable to a specific candidate or party, or intentionally creating long wait times in areas that are less supportive.
Foreign Interference: Involvement by foreign entities in an attempt to influence or manipulate election outcomes, including cyberattacks, disinformation campaigns, or financial support.
Selective Law Enforcement: Using law enforcement selectively to target opposition candidates or parties, creating an uneven playing field.
Disqualification of Opposition Candidates: Employing legal or administrative mechanisms to disqualify opposition candidates on questionable grounds.
Controlled Opposition: Supporting or creating pseudo-opposition parties to divide the opposition vote and prevent a unified challenge.
Voter Apathy Promotion: Discrediting the electoral process to foster a sense of disillusionment and apathy among potential voters.
Election Boycotts: Encouraging or orchestrating a boycott of the election to undermine its legitimacy.
Co-option of Electoral Officials: Ensuring that election officials are sympathetic to a particular candidate or party, compromising the impartiality of the electoral process.
Influencing Candidate Nominations: Manipulating the candidate nomination process to exclude strong competitors or ensure weaker opponents.
Selective Voter Education: Providing biased or incomplete information to voters to manipulate their understanding of candidates, issues, or the electoral process.
Manipulation of Election Results: Tampering with the counting and reporting of votes to produce inaccurate or fraudulent results.
Election Infrastructure Sabotage: Physically damaging or disrupting election infrastructure, such as polling stations or electronic voting systems.
Use of Political Bots: Employing automated social media accounts or bots to amplify certain narratives, drown out opposition voices, or manipulate online discussions.
Identity Politics Exploitation: Manipulating identity-based issues to create divisions among voters and consolidate support within specific demographics.
Selective Voter Mobilization: Targeting specific demographics for voter mobilization efforts while neglecting others to manipulate turnout in favor of a particular candidate or party.
Unfair Access to Media: Providing unequal access to media coverage, debates, or advertising opportunities, giving an advantage to one candidate or party.
Subtle Voter Intimidation: Rather than overt threats, using subtle forms of intimidation, such as anonymous messages or veiled warnings, to discourage voters from supporting a particular candidate.
Selective Provision of Public Goods: Leveraging control over public resources to selectively provide benefits or services to areas that support a specific candidate or party, influencing voter sentiment.
Strategic Timing of Government Announcements: Timing the release of positive government news or policy announcements close to the election
to influence voter perceptions and sway opinions.
Social Pressure Tactics: Encouraging social norms that favor a particular candidate or party, making voters feel pressured to conform
to the perceived majority opinion.
Cooptation of Civil Society: Infiltrating or co-opting independent civil society organizations to manipulate public discourse and influence voter attitudes.
Infiltration of Opposition Camps: Placing moles or agents within opposition parties to gather information, sow discord, or disrupt their strategies.
Election Observation Manipulation: Faking or manipulating the presence of international election observers to create a false
appearance of a transparent and fair electoral process.
Strategic Candidate Replacement: Substituting a candidate at a critical point in the election process to exploit legal loopholes or
gain a tactical advantage.
Financial Market Manipulation: Creating or exploiting economic uncertainties to influence voter behavior and perceptions, potentially using financial markets as a tool.
Manufactured Issue Amplification: Creating or exaggerating specific issues to divert attention from critical matters, manipulate public discourse, and influence voter priorities.
i almost forgot...a USB stick.
In USA you can have your men stand by the booths to club people who
don't vote for your preferred candidate. You should know that! Al Capone did it all the time. Other mob bosses did that too. It was one of the
ways they collected "revenue" from the "billionaires" of their times.
i already listed that one...fourth from top: Intimidation and Violence:
Does the polls say who are the dead people voting for?
I mean, dead people do vote, right? Just...who are they voting for?
I haven't seen the polls mentioned them.
I know the electoral roll hasn't been updated so that means
the same dead people who voted in the last election will
be voting again...just, i want to know who is their favorite candidate?
Do dead people vote by mail or do they
stuffing ballot boxes at night?
Just in case yous people don't know how many registered dead people
there are...
1.8 million.
How To Rig an Election, Again!
Voter Suppression: This involves efforts to reduce the number of
eligible voters or make it difficult for certain groups to vote. Tactics
may include restrictive voter ID laws, purging voter rolls, and limiting polling place accessibility.
Gerrymandering: Manipulating the boundaries of electoral districts
to favor one political party over another. This can lead to a disproportionate representation of certain groups and undermine the
principle of equal representation.
Fraudulent Voter Registration: Illegitimate registration of voters
or manipulation of voter registration records to create fictitious
voters or exclude legitimate ones.
Intimidation and Violence: Coercive tactics, such as physical
violence or threats, to discourage voters from supporting a particular candidate or party.
Media Manipulation: Controlling or influencing media coverage to
favor one candidate or party over others. This can include biased
reporting, censorship, or spreading misinformation.
Vote Buying: Offering material incentives or direct payments to
voters in exchange for their votes, undermining the principle of voting
based on informed choice.
Manipulation of Ballot Design: Designing ballots in a way that
confuses or misleads voters, potentially leading to unintentional errors
in voting.
Hacking and Cyber Interference: Tampering with electronic voting
systems, hacking political party databases, or spreading disinformation online to influence public opinion.
Abuse of State Resources: Using government resources, such as public funds or state-controlled media, to benefit a specific candidate or
party.
Misuse of Proxy Voting: Allowing voters to cast ballots on behalf of others without proper authorization, leading to potential abuse.
Voter Roll Manipulation: Purposely adding or removing voters from
the electoral roll to influence the demographic composition of the electorate.
Election Funding Irregularities: Improper use or manipulation of
campaign finances, including accepting illegal campaign contributions,
to gain an unfair advantage.
Suppression of Independent Monitoring: Restricting the activities of independent election observers, both domestic and international, who
play a crucial role in ensuring transparency and fairness.
Biased Election Administration: Appointing partisan officials to key positions in electoral commissions, potentially leading to biased decision-making and compromised election administration.
Dual Voting: Exploiting weaknesses in voter identification systems
to allow individuals to vote multiple times using different identities.
Infiltration of Political Parties: Infiltrating political parties or campaigns to gather information or disrupt operations from within.
Misuse of Absentee Voting: Manipulating the process of absentee or mail-in voting, including coercion or interception of ballots.
Ethnic and Religious Polarization: Exploiting existing tensions
between different ethnic or religious groups to sway votes along
identity lines.
Election Timing Manipulation: Choosing specific election dates to strategically benefit one party or disadvantage another, such as
scheduling elections during a time of crisis for political gain.
Inadequate Electoral Laws: Designing or maintaining electoral laws
that lack clarity, making it easier to exploit legal loopholes and
engage in questionable practices.
Fake News and Disinformation Campaigns: Spreading false information through traditional media, social media, or other channels to influence public opinion and sway voters.
Strategic Candidate Withdrawal: Coordinating the withdrawal of
certain candidates to consolidate support behind a preferred candidate
and strategically alter the electoral landscape.
Election Day Irregularities: Deliberately creating chaos or
disruptions on election day to discourage voter turnout or cast doubt on
the legitimacy of the process.
Misuse of Postal Votes: Manipulating the handling of postal votes, including tampering with mail-in ballots or coercing voters to submit fraudulent postal votes.
Partisan Polling Stations: Placing polling stations in locations favorable to a specific candidate or party, or intentionally creating
long wait times in areas that are less supportive.
Foreign Interference: Involvement by foreign entities in an attempt
to influence or manipulate election outcomes, including cyberattacks, disinformation campaigns, or financial support.
Selective Law Enforcement: Using law enforcement selectively to
target opposition candidates or parties, creating an uneven playing
field.
Disqualification of Opposition Candidates: Employing legal or administrative mechanisms to disqualify opposition candidates on
questionable grounds.
Controlled Opposition: Supporting or creating pseudo-opposition
parties to divide the opposition vote and prevent a unified challenge.
Voter Apathy Promotion: Discrediting the electoral process to foster
a sense of disillusionment and apathy among potential voters.
Election Boycotts: Encouraging or orchestrating a boycott of the
election to undermine its legitimacy.
Co-option of Electoral Officials: Ensuring that election officials
are sympathetic to a particular candidate or party, compromising the impartiality of the electoral process.
Influencing Candidate Nominations: Manipulating the candidate
nomination process to exclude strong competitors or ensure weaker
opponents.
Selective Voter Education: Providing biased or incomplete
information to voters to manipulate their understanding of candidates, issues, or the electoral process.
Manipulation of Election Results: Tampering with the counting and reporting of votes to produce inaccurate or fraudulent results.
Election Infrastructure Sabotage: Physically damaging or disrupting election infrastructure, such as polling stations or electronic voting systems.
Use of Political Bots: Employing automated social media accounts or
bots to amplify certain narratives, drown out opposition voices, or manipulate online discussions.
Identity Politics Exploitation: Manipulating identity-based issues
to create divisions among voters and consolidate support within specific demographics.
Selective Voter Mobilization: Targeting specific demographics for
voter mobilization efforts while neglecting others to manipulate turnout
in favor of a particular candidate or party.
Unfair Access to Media: Providing unequal access to media coverage, debates, or advertising opportunities, giving an advantage to one
candidate or party.
Subtle Voter Intimidation: Rather than overt threats, using subtle forms of intimidation, such as anonymous messages or veiled warnings, to discourage voters from supporting a particular candidate.
Selective Provision of Public Goods: Leveraging control over public resources to selectively provide benefits or services to areas that
support a specific candidate or party, influencing voter sentiment.
Strategic Timing of Government Announcements: Timing the release of positive government news or policy announcements close to the election
to influence voter perceptions and sway opinions.
Social Pressure Tactics: Encouraging social norms that favor a
particular candidate or party, making voters feel pressured to conform
to the perceived majority opinion.
Cooptation of Civil Society: Infiltrating or co-opting independent
civil society organizations to manipulate public discourse and influence voter attitudes.
Infiltration of Opposition Camps: Placing moles or agents within opposition parties to gather information, sow discord, or disrupt their strategies.
Election Observation Manipulation: Faking or manipulating the
presence of international election observers to create a false
appearance of a transparent and fair electoral process.
Strategic Candidate Replacement: Substituting a candidate at a
critical point in the election process to exploit legal loopholes or
gain a tactical advantage.
Financial Market Manipulation: Creating or exploiting economic uncertainties to influence voter behavior and perceptions, potentially
using financial markets as a tool.
Manufactured Issue Amplification: Creating or exaggerating specific issues to divert attention from critical matters, manipulate public discourse, and influence voter priorities.
i almost forgot...a USB stick.
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.
Does the polls say who are the dead people voting for?
I mean, dead people do vote, right? Just...who are they voting for?
I haven't seen the polls mentioned them.
I know the electoral roll hasn't been updated so that means
the same dead people who voted in the last election will
be voting again...just, i want to know who is their favorite candidate?
Do dead people vote by mail or do they
stuffing ballot boxes at night?
Just in case yous people don't know how many registered dead people
there are...
1.8 million.
How To Rig an Election, Again!
Voter Suppression: This involves efforts to reduce the number of
eligible voters or make it difficult for certain groups to vote. Tactics
may include restrictive voter ID laws, purging voter rolls, and limiting >polling place accessibility.
Gerrymandering: Manipulating the boundaries of electoral districts
to favor one political party over another. This can lead to a >disproportionate representation of certain groups and undermine the
principle of equal representation.
Fraudulent Voter Registration: Illegitimate registration of voters
or manipulation of voter registration records to create fictitious
voters or exclude legitimate ones.
Intimidation and Violence: Coercive tactics, such as physical
violence or threats, to discourage voters from supporting a particular >candidate or party.
Media Manipulation: Controlling or influencing media coverage to
favor one candidate or party over others. This can include biased
reporting, censorship, or spreading misinformation.
Vote Buying: Offering material incentives or direct payments to
voters in exchange for their votes, undermining the principle of voting
based on informed choice.
Manipulation of Ballot Design: Designing ballots in a way that
confuses or misleads voters, potentially leading to unintentional errors
in voting.
Hacking and Cyber Interference: Tampering with electronic voting
systems, hacking political party databases, or spreading disinformation >online to influence public opinion.
Abuse of State Resources: Using government resources, such as public
funds or state-controlled media, to benefit a specific candidate or
party.
Misuse of Proxy Voting: Allowing voters to cast ballots on behalf of
others without proper authorization, leading to potential abuse.
Voter Roll Manipulation: Purposely adding or removing voters from
the electoral roll to influence the demographic composition of the >electorate.
Election Funding Irregularities: Improper use or manipulation of
campaign finances, including accepting illegal campaign contributions,
to gain an unfair advantage.
Suppression of Independent Monitoring: Restricting the activities of
independent election observers, both domestic and international, who
play a crucial role in ensuring transparency and fairness.
Biased Election Administration: Appointing partisan officials to key
positions in electoral commissions, potentially leading to biased >decision-making and compromised election administration.
Dual Voting: Exploiting weaknesses in voter identification systems
to allow individuals to vote multiple times using different identities.
Infiltration of Political Parties: Infiltrating political parties or
campaigns to gather information or disrupt operations from within.
Misuse of Absentee Voting: Manipulating the process of absentee or
mail-in voting, including coercion or interception of ballots.
Ethnic and Religious Polarization: Exploiting existing tensions
between different ethnic or religious groups to sway votes along
identity lines.
Election Timing Manipulation: Choosing specific election dates to
strategically benefit one party or disadvantage another, such as
scheduling elections during a time of crisis for political gain.
Inadequate Electoral Laws: Designing or maintaining electoral laws
that lack clarity, making it easier to exploit legal loopholes and
engage in questionable practices.
Fake News and Disinformation Campaigns: Spreading false information
through traditional media, social media, or other channels to influence >public opinion and sway voters.
Strategic Candidate Withdrawal: Coordinating the withdrawal of
certain candidates to consolidate support behind a preferred candidate
and strategically alter the electoral landscape.
Election Day Irregularities: Deliberately creating chaos or
disruptions on election day to discourage voter turnout or cast doubt on
the legitimacy of the process.
Misuse of Postal Votes: Manipulating the handling of postal votes,
including tampering with mail-in ballots or coercing voters to submit >fraudulent postal votes.
Partisan Polling Stations: Placing polling stations in locations
favorable to a specific candidate or party, or intentionally creating
long wait times in areas that are less supportive.
Foreign Interference: Involvement by foreign entities in an attempt
to influence or manipulate election outcomes, including cyberattacks, >disinformation campaigns, or financial support.
Selective Law Enforcement: Using law enforcement selectively to
target opposition candidates or parties, creating an uneven playing
field.
Disqualification of Opposition Candidates: Employing legal or
administrative mechanisms to disqualify opposition candidates on
questionable grounds.
Controlled Opposition: Supporting or creating pseudo-opposition
parties to divide the opposition vote and prevent a unified challenge.
Voter Apathy Promotion: Discrediting the electoral process to foster
a sense of disillusionment and apathy among potential voters.
Election Boycotts: Encouraging or orchestrating a boycott of the
election to undermine its legitimacy.
Co-option of Electoral Officials: Ensuring that election officials
are sympathetic to a particular candidate or party, compromising the >impartiality of the electoral process.
Influencing Candidate Nominations: Manipulating the candidate
nomination process to exclude strong competitors or ensure weaker
opponents.
Selective Voter Education: Providing biased or incomplete
information to voters to manipulate their understanding of candidates, >issues, or the electoral process.
Manipulation of Election Results: Tampering with the counting and
reporting of votes to produce inaccurate or fraudulent results.
Election Infrastructure Sabotage: Physically damaging or disrupting
election infrastructure, such as polling stations or electronic voting >systems.
Use of Political Bots: Employing automated social media accounts or
bots to amplify certain narratives, drown out opposition voices, or >manipulate online discussions.
Identity Politics Exploitation: Manipulating identity-based issues
to create divisions among voters and consolidate support within specific >demographics.
Selective Voter Mobilization: Targeting specific demographics for
voter mobilization efforts while neglecting others to manipulate turnout
in favor of a particular candidate or party.
Unfair Access to Media: Providing unequal access to media coverage,
debates, or advertising opportunities, giving an advantage to one
candidate or party.
Subtle Voter Intimidation: Rather than overt threats, using subtle
forms of intimidation, such as anonymous messages or veiled warnings, to >discourage voters from supporting a particular candidate.
Selective Provision of Public Goods: Leveraging control over public
resources to selectively provide benefits or services to areas that
support a specific candidate or party, influencing voter sentiment.
Strategic Timing of Government Announcements: Timing the release of
positive government news or policy announcements close to the election
to influence voter perceptions and sway opinions.
Social Pressure Tactics: Encouraging social norms that favor a
particular candidate or party, making voters feel pressured to conform
to the perceived majority opinion.
Cooptation of Civil Society: Infiltrating or co-opting independent
civil society organizations to manipulate public discourse and influence >voter attitudes.
Infiltration of Opposition Camps: Placing moles or agents within
opposition parties to gather information, sow discord, or disrupt their >strategies.
Election Observation Manipulation: Faking or manipulating the
presence of international election observers to create a false
appearance of a transparent and fair electoral process.
Strategic Candidate Replacement: Substituting a candidate at a
critical point in the election process to exploit legal loopholes or
gain a tactical advantage.
Financial Market Manipulation: Creating or exploiting economic
uncertainties to influence voter behavior and perceptions, potentially
using financial markets as a tool.
Manufactured Issue Amplification: Creating or exaggerating specific
issues to divert attention from critical matters, manipulate public >discourse, and influence voter priorities.
i almost forgot...a USB stick.
I notice that I haven't heard *anywhere* that the Democrats are
planning to cancel the November election, why is that?
Am I delusional?
Am I imagining things?
Maybe the Media are afraid to mention anything that has to do with
election rigging unless somebody else in the media publishes it first.
They are too busy with ...today's news.
I'm a futurists.
So, sticking with today...
what new brick walls
are the Democrats
throwing up in
front of Donald Trump?
I should ask Nancy Pelosi because
she is orchestrating everything, right?
She's on the phone everyday calling the CIA..."CAN'T YOU JUST FUCKING
KILL HIM????"
On Tue, 09 Jan 2024 00:38:08 -0800, The Starmaker--
<starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
Does the polls say who are the dead people voting for?
I mean, dead people do vote, right? Just...who are they voting for?
I haven't seen the polls mentioned them.
I know the electoral roll hasn't been updated so that means
the same dead people who voted in the last election will
be voting again...just, i want to know who is their favorite candidate?
Do dead people vote by mail or do they
stuffing ballot boxes at night?
Just in case yous people don't know how many registered dead people
there are...
1.8 million.
How To Rig an Election, Again!
Voter Suppression: This involves efforts to reduce the number of >>eligible voters or make it difficult for certain groups to vote. Tactics >>may include restrictive voter ID laws, purging voter rolls, and limiting >>polling place accessibility.
Gerrymandering: Manipulating the boundaries of electoral districts
to favor one political party over another. This can lead to a >>disproportionate representation of certain groups and undermine the >>principle of equal representation.
Fraudulent Voter Registration: Illegitimate registration of voters
or manipulation of voter registration records to create fictitious
voters or exclude legitimate ones.
Intimidation and Violence: Coercive tactics, such as physical
violence or threats, to discourage voters from supporting a particular >>candidate or party.
Media Manipulation: Controlling or influencing media coverage to
favor one candidate or party over others. This can include biased >>reporting, censorship, or spreading misinformation.
Vote Buying: Offering material incentives or direct payments to
voters in exchange for their votes, undermining the principle of voting >>based on informed choice.
Manipulation of Ballot Design: Designing ballots in a way that
confuses or misleads voters, potentially leading to unintentional errors
in voting.
Hacking and Cyber Interference: Tampering with electronic voting >>systems, hacking political party databases, or spreading disinformation >>online to influence public opinion.
Abuse of State Resources: Using government resources, such as public >>funds or state-controlled media, to benefit a specific candidate or
party.
Misuse of Proxy Voting: Allowing voters to cast ballots on behalf of >>others without proper authorization, leading to potential abuse.
Voter Roll Manipulation: Purposely adding or removing voters from
the electoral roll to influence the demographic composition of the >>electorate.
Election Funding Irregularities: Improper use or manipulation of >>campaign finances, including accepting illegal campaign contributions,
to gain an unfair advantage.
Suppression of Independent Monitoring: Restricting the activities of >>independent election observers, both domestic and international, who
play a crucial role in ensuring transparency and fairness.
Biased Election Administration: Appointing partisan officials to key >>positions in electoral commissions, potentially leading to biased >>decision-making and compromised election administration.
Dual Voting: Exploiting weaknesses in voter identification systems
to allow individuals to vote multiple times using different identities.
Infiltration of Political Parties: Infiltrating political parties or >>campaigns to gather information or disrupt operations from within.
Misuse of Absentee Voting: Manipulating the process of absentee or >>mail-in voting, including coercion or interception of ballots.
Ethnic and Religious Polarization: Exploiting existing tensions
between different ethnic or religious groups to sway votes along
identity lines.
Election Timing Manipulation: Choosing specific election dates to >>strategically benefit one party or disadvantage another, such as
scheduling elections during a time of crisis for political gain.
Inadequate Electoral Laws: Designing or maintaining electoral laws
that lack clarity, making it easier to exploit legal loopholes and
engage in questionable practices.
Fake News and Disinformation Campaigns: Spreading false information >>through traditional media, social media, or other channels to influence >>public opinion and sway voters.
Strategic Candidate Withdrawal: Coordinating the withdrawal of
certain candidates to consolidate support behind a preferred candidate
and strategically alter the electoral landscape.
Election Day Irregularities: Deliberately creating chaos or
disruptions on election day to discourage voter turnout or cast doubt on >>the legitimacy of the process.
Misuse of Postal Votes: Manipulating the handling of postal votes, >>including tampering with mail-in ballots or coercing voters to submit >>fraudulent postal votes.
Partisan Polling Stations: Placing polling stations in locations >>favorable to a specific candidate or party, or intentionally creating
long wait times in areas that are less supportive.
Foreign Interference: Involvement by foreign entities in an attempt
to influence or manipulate election outcomes, including cyberattacks, >>disinformation campaigns, or financial support.
Selective Law Enforcement: Using law enforcement selectively to
target opposition candidates or parties, creating an uneven playing
field.
Disqualification of Opposition Candidates: Employing legal or >>administrative mechanisms to disqualify opposition candidates on >>questionable grounds.
Controlled Opposition: Supporting or creating pseudo-opposition
parties to divide the opposition vote and prevent a unified challenge.
Voter Apathy Promotion: Discrediting the electoral process to foster
a sense of disillusionment and apathy among potential voters.
Election Boycotts: Encouraging or orchestrating a boycott of the >>election to undermine its legitimacy.
Co-option of Electoral Officials: Ensuring that election officials
are sympathetic to a particular candidate or party, compromising the >>impartiality of the electoral process.
Influencing Candidate Nominations: Manipulating the candidate >>nomination process to exclude strong competitors or ensure weaker >>opponents.
Selective Voter Education: Providing biased or incomplete
information to voters to manipulate their understanding of candidates, >>issues, or the electoral process.
Manipulation of Election Results: Tampering with the counting and >>reporting of votes to produce inaccurate or fraudulent results.
Election Infrastructure Sabotage: Physically damaging or disrupting >>election infrastructure, such as polling stations or electronic voting >>systems.
Use of Political Bots: Employing automated social media accounts or >>bots to amplify certain narratives, drown out opposition voices, or >>manipulate online discussions.
Identity Politics Exploitation: Manipulating identity-based issues
to create divisions among voters and consolidate support within specific >>demographics.
Selective Voter Mobilization: Targeting specific demographics for
voter mobilization efforts while neglecting others to manipulate turnout
in favor of a particular candidate or party.
Unfair Access to Media: Providing unequal access to media coverage, >>debates, or advertising opportunities, giving an advantage to one
candidate or party.
Subtle Voter Intimidation: Rather than overt threats, using subtle >>forms of intimidation, such as anonymous messages or veiled warnings, to >>discourage voters from supporting a particular candidate.
Selective Provision of Public Goods: Leveraging control over public >>resources to selectively provide benefits or services to areas that
support a specific candidate or party, influencing voter sentiment.
Strategic Timing of Government Announcements: Timing the release of >>positive government news or policy announcements close to the election
to influence voter perceptions and sway opinions.
Social Pressure Tactics: Encouraging social norms that favor a >>particular candidate or party, making voters feel pressured to conform
to the perceived majority opinion.
Cooptation of Civil Society: Infiltrating or co-opting independent >>civil society organizations to manipulate public discourse and influence >>voter attitudes.
Infiltration of Opposition Camps: Placing moles or agents within >>opposition parties to gather information, sow discord, or disrupt their >>strategies.
Election Observation Manipulation: Faking or manipulating the
presence of international election observers to create a false
appearance of a transparent and fair electoral process.
Strategic Candidate Replacement: Substituting a candidate at a
critical point in the election process to exploit legal loopholes or
gain a tactical advantage.
Financial Market Manipulation: Creating or exploiting economic >>uncertainties to influence voter behavior and perceptions, potentially >>using financial markets as a tool.
Manufactured Issue Amplification: Creating or exaggerating specific >>issues to divert attention from critical matters, manipulate public >>discourse, and influence voter priorities.
i almost forgot...a USB stick.
I notice that I haven't heard *anywhere* that the Democrats are
planning to cancel the November election, why is that?
Am I delusional?
Am I imagining things?
Maybe the Media are afraid to mention anything that has to do with
election rigging unless somebody else in the media publishes it first.
They are too busy with ...today's news.
I'm a futurists.
So, sticking with today...
what new brick walls
are the Democrats
throwing up in
front of Donald Trump?
The Starmaker wrote:
I notice that I haven't heard *anywhere* that the Democrats are
planning to cancel the November election, why is that?
Am I delusional?
Quite.
Am I imagining things?
Yes.
Maybe the Media are afraid to mention anything that has to do with
election rigging unless somebody else in the media publishes it first.
They are too busy with ...today's news.
I'm a futurists.
So, sticking with today...
what new brick walls
are the Democrats
throwing up in
front of Donald Trump?
1. bamboo ballots
2. magic thermostats
3. ballots from NoKo coming into a port in Maine
4. HUGO CHAVEZ
5. satellites controlled from Italy switch votes
Now, in today's DrudgeReport
https://www.drudgereport.com/
you see a picture of dat judge...
https://www.cnn.com/2024/01/30/politics/trump-fraud-trial-verdict-what-to-watch-for/index.html
is that judge what you call a ..."co-opting judge"????
I'm not sure exactly the meaning of a "co-opting judge"...
to me it means
sold!
that kind you buy..
the democrats owns his ass.
I'm still not sure what "co-opting judge" means..
but
it sounds to me like a judge you buy but
you have to buy other judges first to get
your ."co-opting judge" bought lock, stock and barrel.
Who can trust a judge who doesn't take money?
On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 22:36:17 -0800, The Starmaker
<starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
I notice that I haven't heard *anywhere* that the Democrats are
planning to cancel the November election, why is that?
Am I delusional?
Am I imagining things?
Maybe the Media are afraid to mention anything that has to do with
election rigging unless somebody else in the media publishes it first.
They are too busy with ...today's news.
I'm a futurists.
So, sticking with today...
what new brick walls
are the Democrats
throwing up in
front of Donald Trump?
I should ask Nancy Pelosi because
she is orchestrating everything, right?
She's on the phone everyday calling the CIA..."CAN'T YOU JUST FUCKING
KILL HIM????"
On Tue, 09 Jan 2024 00:38:08 -0800, The Starmaker
<starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
--Does the polls say who are the dead people voting for?
I mean, dead people do vote, right? Just...who are they voting for?
I haven't seen the polls mentioned them.
I know the electoral roll hasn't been updated so that means
the same dead people who voted in the last election will
be voting again...just, i want to know who is their favorite candidate?
Do dead people vote by mail or do they
stuffing ballot boxes at night?
Just in case yous people don't know how many registered dead people
there are...
1.8 million.
How To Rig an Election, Again!
Voter Suppression: This involves efforts to reduce the number of >>eligible voters or make it difficult for certain groups to vote. Tactics >>may include restrictive voter ID laws, purging voter rolls, and limiting >>polling place accessibility.
Gerrymandering: Manipulating the boundaries of electoral districts
to favor one political party over another. This can lead to a >>disproportionate representation of certain groups and undermine the >>principle of equal representation.
Fraudulent Voter Registration: Illegitimate registration of voters
or manipulation of voter registration records to create fictitious
voters or exclude legitimate ones.
Intimidation and Violence: Coercive tactics, such as physical >>violence or threats, to discourage voters from supporting a particular >>candidate or party.
Media Manipulation: Controlling or influencing media coverage to >>favor one candidate or party over others. This can include biased >>reporting, censorship, or spreading misinformation.
Vote Buying: Offering material incentives or direct payments to >>voters in exchange for their votes, undermining the principle of voting >>based on informed choice.
Manipulation of Ballot Design: Designing ballots in a way that >>confuses or misleads voters, potentially leading to unintentional errors >>in voting.
Hacking and Cyber Interference: Tampering with electronic voting >>systems, hacking political party databases, or spreading disinformation >>online to influence public opinion.
Abuse of State Resources: Using government resources, such as public >>funds or state-controlled media, to benefit a specific candidate or >>party.
Misuse of Proxy Voting: Allowing voters to cast ballots on behalf of >>others without proper authorization, leading to potential abuse.
Voter Roll Manipulation: Purposely adding or removing voters from
the electoral roll to influence the demographic composition of the >>electorate.
Election Funding Irregularities: Improper use or manipulation of >>campaign finances, including accepting illegal campaign contributions,
to gain an unfair advantage.
Suppression of Independent Monitoring: Restricting the activities of >>independent election observers, both domestic and international, who
play a crucial role in ensuring transparency and fairness.
Biased Election Administration: Appointing partisan officials to key >>positions in electoral commissions, potentially leading to biased >>decision-making and compromised election administration.
Dual Voting: Exploiting weaknesses in voter identification systems
to allow individuals to vote multiple times using different identities.
Infiltration of Political Parties: Infiltrating political parties or >>campaigns to gather information or disrupt operations from within.
Misuse of Absentee Voting: Manipulating the process of absentee or >>mail-in voting, including coercion or interception of ballots.
Ethnic and Religious Polarization: Exploiting existing tensions >>between different ethnic or religious groups to sway votes along
identity lines.
Election Timing Manipulation: Choosing specific election dates to >>strategically benefit one party or disadvantage another, such as >>scheduling elections during a time of crisis for political gain.
Inadequate Electoral Laws: Designing or maintaining electoral laws >>that lack clarity, making it easier to exploit legal loopholes and
engage in questionable practices.
Fake News and Disinformation Campaigns: Spreading false information >>through traditional media, social media, or other channels to influence >>public opinion and sway voters.
Strategic Candidate Withdrawal: Coordinating the withdrawal of >>certain candidates to consolidate support behind a preferred candidate >>and strategically alter the electoral landscape.
Election Day Irregularities: Deliberately creating chaos or >>disruptions on election day to discourage voter turnout or cast doubt on >>the legitimacy of the process.
Misuse of Postal Votes: Manipulating the handling of postal votes, >>including tampering with mail-in ballots or coercing voters to submit >>fraudulent postal votes.
Partisan Polling Stations: Placing polling stations in locations >>favorable to a specific candidate or party, or intentionally creating >>long wait times in areas that are less supportive.
Foreign Interference: Involvement by foreign entities in an attempt >>to influence or manipulate election outcomes, including cyberattacks, >>disinformation campaigns, or financial support.
Selective Law Enforcement: Using law enforcement selectively to >>target opposition candidates or parties, creating an uneven playing >>field.
Disqualification of Opposition Candidates: Employing legal or >>administrative mechanisms to disqualify opposition candidates on >>questionable grounds.
Controlled Opposition: Supporting or creating pseudo-opposition >>parties to divide the opposition vote and prevent a unified challenge.
Voter Apathy Promotion: Discrediting the electoral process to foster >>a sense of disillusionment and apathy among potential voters.
Election Boycotts: Encouraging or orchestrating a boycott of the >>election to undermine its legitimacy.
Co-option of Electoral Officials: Ensuring that election officials >>are sympathetic to a particular candidate or party, compromising the >>impartiality of the electoral process.
Influencing Candidate Nominations: Manipulating the candidate >>nomination process to exclude strong competitors or ensure weaker >>opponents.
Selective Voter Education: Providing biased or incomplete
information to voters to manipulate their understanding of candidates, >>issues, or the electoral process.
Manipulation of Election Results: Tampering with the counting and >>reporting of votes to produce inaccurate or fraudulent results.
Election Infrastructure Sabotage: Physically damaging or disrupting >>election infrastructure, such as polling stations or electronic voting >>systems.
Use of Political Bots: Employing automated social media accounts or >>bots to amplify certain narratives, drown out opposition voices, or >>manipulate online discussions.
Identity Politics Exploitation: Manipulating identity-based issues
to create divisions among voters and consolidate support within specific >>demographics.
Selective Voter Mobilization: Targeting specific demographics for >>voter mobilization efforts while neglecting others to manipulate turnout >>in favor of a particular candidate or party.
Unfair Access to Media: Providing unequal access to media coverage, >>debates, or advertising opportunities, giving an advantage to one >>candidate or party.
Subtle Voter Intimidation: Rather than overt threats, using subtle >>forms of intimidation, such as anonymous messages or veiled warnings, to >>discourage voters from supporting a particular candidate.
Selective Provision of Public Goods: Leveraging control over public >>resources to selectively provide benefits or services to areas that >>support a specific candidate or party, influencing voter sentiment.
Strategic Timing of Government Announcements: Timing the release of >>positive government news or policy announcements close to the election
to influence voter perceptions and sway opinions.
Social Pressure Tactics: Encouraging social norms that favor a >>particular candidate or party, making voters feel pressured to conform
to the perceived majority opinion.
Cooptation of Civil Society: Infiltrating or co-opting independent >>civil society organizations to manipulate public discourse and influence >>voter attitudes.
Infiltration of Opposition Camps: Placing moles or agents within >>opposition parties to gather information, sow discord, or disrupt their >>strategies.
Election Observation Manipulation: Faking or manipulating the >>presence of international election observers to create a false
appearance of a transparent and fair electoral process.
Strategic Candidate Replacement: Substituting a candidate at a >>critical point in the election process to exploit legal loopholes or
gain a tactical advantage.
Financial Market Manipulation: Creating or exploiting economic >>uncertainties to influence voter behavior and perceptions, potentially >>using financial markets as a tool.
Manufactured Issue Amplification: Creating or exaggerating specific >>issues to divert attention from critical matters, manipulate public >>discourse, and influence voter priorities.
i almost forgot...a USB stick.
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
the unchallengeable.
NEW - Former President of City Council of Atlantic City charged with submitting fraudulent mail-in ballots.
A criminal complaint accuses Craig Callaway, 64, a political organizer,
of illegally obtaining and
casting ballots that were counted in the November 2022 election.
About a month before the election, Callaway and others allegedly paid
several individuals to carry
completed Vote-By-Mail applications to the county clerk's office.
Once these individuals received the fraudulent mail-in ballots, they reportedly handed them over to Callaway and his associates.
Many of the mail-in ballots collected in this manner were allegedly cast using the names of
individuals who have since confirmed that they did not vote in the
November 2022 election.
Moreover, these individuals have stated that they did not give
authorization for
Callaway, his associates, or anyone else to vote on their behalf.
The criminal complaint discloses that a significant number of these fraudulent mail-in ballots were
officially counted in the November 2022 election.
https://twitter.com/i/status/1755069412032553375
The Starmaker wrote:
Now, in today's DrudgeReport
https://www.drudgereport.com/
you see a picture of dat judge...
https://www.cnn.com/2024/01/30/politics/trump-fraud-trial-verdict-what-to-watch-for/index.html
is that judge what you call a ..."co-opting judge"????
I'm not sure exactly the meaning of a "co-opting judge"...
to me it means
sold!
that kind you buy..
the democrats owns his ass.
I'm still not sure what "co-opting judge" means..
but
it sounds to me like a judge you buy but
you have to buy other judges first to get
your ."co-opting judge" bought lock, stock and barrel.
Who can trust a judge who doesn't take money?
On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 22:36:17 -0800, The Starmaker
<starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
I notice that I haven't heard *anywhere* that the Democrats are
planning to cancel the November election, why is that?
Am I delusional?
Am I imagining things?
Maybe the Media are afraid to mention anything that has to do with >election rigging unless somebody else in the media publishes it first.
They are too busy with ...today's news.
I'm a futurists.
So, sticking with today...
what new brick walls
are the Democrats
throwing up in
front of Donald Trump?
I should ask Nancy Pelosi because
she is orchestrating everything, right?
She's on the phone everyday calling the CIA..."CAN'T YOU JUST FUCKING >KILL HIM????"
On Tue, 09 Jan 2024 00:38:08 -0800, The Starmaker ><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
--Does the polls say who are the dead people voting for?
I mean, dead people do vote, right? Just...who are they voting for?
I haven't seen the polls mentioned them.
I know the electoral roll hasn't been updated so that means
the same dead people who voted in the last election will
be voting again...just, i want to know who is their favorite candidate? >>
Do dead people vote by mail or do they
stuffing ballot boxes at night?
Just in case yous people don't know how many registered dead people >>there are...
1.8 million.
How To Rig an Election, Again!
Voter Suppression: This involves efforts to reduce the number of >>eligible voters or make it difficult for certain groups to vote. Tactics >>may include restrictive voter ID laws, purging voter rolls, and limiting >>polling place accessibility.
Gerrymandering: Manipulating the boundaries of electoral districts >>to favor one political party over another. This can lead to a >>disproportionate representation of certain groups and undermine the >>principle of equal representation.
Fraudulent Voter Registration: Illegitimate registration of voters >>or manipulation of voter registration records to create fictitious >>voters or exclude legitimate ones.
Intimidation and Violence: Coercive tactics, such as physical >>violence or threats, to discourage voters from supporting a particular >>candidate or party.
Media Manipulation: Controlling or influencing media coverage to >>favor one candidate or party over others. This can include biased >>reporting, censorship, or spreading misinformation.
Vote Buying: Offering material incentives or direct payments to >>voters in exchange for their votes, undermining the principle of voting >>based on informed choice.
Manipulation of Ballot Design: Designing ballots in a way that >>confuses or misleads voters, potentially leading to unintentional errors >>in voting.
Hacking and Cyber Interference: Tampering with electronic voting >>systems, hacking political party databases, or spreading disinformation >>online to influence public opinion.
Abuse of State Resources: Using government resources, such as public >>funds or state-controlled media, to benefit a specific candidate or >>party.
Misuse of Proxy Voting: Allowing voters to cast ballots on behalf of >>others without proper authorization, leading to potential abuse.
Voter Roll Manipulation: Purposely adding or removing voters from >>the electoral roll to influence the demographic composition of the >>electorate.
Election Funding Irregularities: Improper use or manipulation of >>campaign finances, including accepting illegal campaign contributions, >>to gain an unfair advantage.
Suppression of Independent Monitoring: Restricting the activities of >>independent election observers, both domestic and international, who >>play a crucial role in ensuring transparency and fairness.
Biased Election Administration: Appointing partisan officials to key >>positions in electoral commissions, potentially leading to biased >>decision-making and compromised election administration.
Dual Voting: Exploiting weaknesses in voter identification systems >>to allow individuals to vote multiple times using different identities. >>
Infiltration of Political Parties: Infiltrating political parties or >>campaigns to gather information or disrupt operations from within.
Misuse of Absentee Voting: Manipulating the process of absentee or >>mail-in voting, including coercion or interception of ballots.
Ethnic and Religious Polarization: Exploiting existing tensions >>between different ethnic or religious groups to sway votes along >>identity lines.
Election Timing Manipulation: Choosing specific election dates to >>strategically benefit one party or disadvantage another, such as >>scheduling elections during a time of crisis for political gain.
Inadequate Electoral Laws: Designing or maintaining electoral laws >>that lack clarity, making it easier to exploit legal loopholes and >>engage in questionable practices.
Fake News and Disinformation Campaigns: Spreading false information >>through traditional media, social media, or other channels to influence >>public opinion and sway voters.
Strategic Candidate Withdrawal: Coordinating the withdrawal of >>certain candidates to consolidate support behind a preferred candidate >>and strategically alter the electoral landscape.
Election Day Irregularities: Deliberately creating chaos or >>disruptions on election day to discourage voter turnout or cast doubt on >>the legitimacy of the process.
Misuse of Postal Votes: Manipulating the handling of postal votes, >>including tampering with mail-in ballots or coercing voters to submit >>fraudulent postal votes.
Partisan Polling Stations: Placing polling stations in locations >>favorable to a specific candidate or party, or intentionally creating >>long wait times in areas that are less supportive.
Foreign Interference: Involvement by foreign entities in an attempt >>to influence or manipulate election outcomes, including cyberattacks, >>disinformation campaigns, or financial support.
Selective Law Enforcement: Using law enforcement selectively to >>target opposition candidates or parties, creating an uneven playing >>field.
Disqualification of Opposition Candidates: Employing legal or >>administrative mechanisms to disqualify opposition candidates on >>questionable grounds.
Controlled Opposition: Supporting or creating pseudo-opposition >>parties to divide the opposition vote and prevent a unified challenge.
Voter Apathy Promotion: Discrediting the electoral process to foster >>a sense of disillusionment and apathy among potential voters.
Election Boycotts: Encouraging or orchestrating a boycott of the >>election to undermine its legitimacy.
Co-option of Electoral Officials: Ensuring that election officials >>are sympathetic to a particular candidate or party, compromising the >>impartiality of the electoral process.
Influencing Candidate Nominations: Manipulating the candidate >>nomination process to exclude strong competitors or ensure weaker >>opponents.
Selective Voter Education: Providing biased or incomplete >>information to voters to manipulate their understanding of candidates, >>issues, or the electoral process.
Manipulation of Election Results: Tampering with the counting and >>reporting of votes to produce inaccurate or fraudulent results.
Election Infrastructure Sabotage: Physically damaging or disrupting >>election infrastructure, such as polling stations or electronic voting >>systems.
Use of Political Bots: Employing automated social media accounts or >>bots to amplify certain narratives, drown out opposition voices, or >>manipulate online discussions.
Identity Politics Exploitation: Manipulating identity-based issues >>to create divisions among voters and consolidate support within specific >>demographics.
Selective Voter Mobilization: Targeting specific demographics for >>voter mobilization efforts while neglecting others to manipulate turnout >>in favor of a particular candidate or party.
Unfair Access to Media: Providing unequal access to media coverage, >>debates, or advertising opportunities, giving an advantage to one >>candidate or party.
Subtle Voter Intimidation: Rather than overt threats, using subtle >>forms of intimidation, such as anonymous messages or veiled warnings, to >>discourage voters from supporting a particular candidate.
Selective Provision of Public Goods: Leveraging control over public >>resources to selectively provide benefits or services to areas that >>support a specific candidate or party, influencing voter sentiment.
Strategic Timing of Government Announcements: Timing the release of >>positive government news or policy announcements close to the election >>to influence voter perceptions and sway opinions.
Social Pressure Tactics: Encouraging social norms that favor a >>particular candidate or party, making voters feel pressured to conform >>to the perceived majority opinion.
Cooptation of Civil Society: Infiltrating or co-opting independent >>civil society organizations to manipulate public discourse and influence >>voter attitudes.
Infiltration of Opposition Camps: Placing moles or agents within >>opposition parties to gather information, sow discord, or disrupt their >>strategies.
Election Observation Manipulation: Faking or manipulating the >>presence of international election observers to create a false >>appearance of a transparent and fair electoral process.
Strategic Candidate Replacement: Substituting a candidate at a >>critical point in the election process to exploit legal loopholes or >>gain a tactical advantage.
Financial Market Manipulation: Creating or exploiting economic >>uncertainties to influence voter behavior and perceptions, potentially >>using financial markets as a tool.
Manufactured Issue Amplification: Creating or exaggerating specific >>issues to divert attention from critical matters, manipulate public >>discourse, and influence voter priorities.
i almost forgot...a USB stick.
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
the unchallengeable.
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.
For Immediate Release
U.S. Attorney's Office, District of New Jersey
https://www.justice.gov/usao-nj/pr/political-organizer-and-former-president-city-council-atlantic-city-charged-submitting
Here is a step-by-step of the fraudulent mail-in ballot scheme:
Recruitment and Promise of Payment: Callaway and his associates approach individuals in Atlantic City approximately one month before the November 8, 2022, general election. T
hey promise to pay these individuals $30 to $50 to act as authorized messengers for voters who wish to vote by mail.
Collection of Vote-By-Mail Applications: Callaway or his subordinates provide these recruited messengers with completed Vote-By-Mail Applications.
The messengers then enter the Atlantic County clerk’s office, carrying anywhere from one to four completed applications.
Submission of Applications: The messengers, following instructions from Callaway or his subordinates, provide proof of
identification and sign the Vote-By-Mail Applications in the authorized messenger portion. These applications are then submitted to office personnel at the county clerk's office.
Receiving Mail-In Ballots: If the applications are approved, office personnel provide mail-in ballots for the
voters listed on the applications to the purported messengers.
Breach of Legal Requirements: Under New Jersey law, messengers are required to deliver any mail-in ballots they received directly to
the voters who requested them and certify that they will do so. However, instead of delivering the ballots to the voters, the messengers hand them over to Callaway or his subordinates.
Fraudulent Casting of Ballots: Callaway and his subordinates receive the mail-in ballots collected by the messengers. They proceed to cast
these ballots in the names of individuals who did not actually vote in the 2022 General Election and did not authorize anyone to cast ballots on their behalf.
Ballot Counting: Despite the fraudulent nature of these ballots, many of them are counted towards the election results.
This process involves a series of illegal actions, including bribery, forgery, and violation of election laws, aimed at manipulating
the electoral process and casting fraudulent votes.
"manipulating the electoral process"???? wat does dat mean?
The Starmaker wrote:
NEW - Former President of City Council of Atlantic City charged with submitting fraudulent mail-in ballots.
A criminal complaint accuses Craig Callaway, 64, a political organizer,
of illegally obtaining and
casting ballots that were counted in the November 2022 election.
About a month before the election, Callaway and others allegedly paid several individuals to carry
completed Vote-By-Mail applications to the county clerk's office.
Once these individuals received the fraudulent mail-in ballots, they reportedly handed them over to Callaway and his associates.
Many of the mail-in ballots collected in this manner were allegedly cast using the names of
individuals who have since confirmed that they did not vote in the
November 2022 election.
Moreover, these individuals have stated that they did not give authorization for
Callaway, his associates, or anyone else to vote on their behalf.
The criminal complaint discloses that a significant number of these fraudulent mail-in ballots were
officially counted in the November 2022 election.
https://twitter.com/i/status/1755069412032553375
The Starmaker wrote:
Now, in today's DrudgeReport
https://www.drudgereport.com/
you see a picture of dat judge...
https://www.cnn.com/2024/01/30/politics/trump-fraud-trial-verdict-what-to-watch-for/index.html
is that judge what you call a ..."co-opting judge"????
I'm not sure exactly the meaning of a "co-opting judge"...
to me it means
sold!
that kind you buy..
the democrats owns his ass.
I'm still not sure what "co-opting judge" means..
but
it sounds to me like a judge you buy but
you have to buy other judges first to get
your ."co-opting judge" bought lock, stock and barrel.
Who can trust a judge who doesn't take money?
On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 22:36:17 -0800, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
I notice that I haven't heard *anywhere* that the Democrats are >planning to cancel the November election, why is that?
Am I delusional?
Am I imagining things?
Maybe the Media are afraid to mention anything that has to do with >election rigging unless somebody else in the media publishes it first.
They are too busy with ...today's news.
I'm a futurists.
So, sticking with today...
what new brick walls
are the Democrats
throwing up in
front of Donald Trump?
I should ask Nancy Pelosi because
she is orchestrating everything, right?
She's on the phone everyday calling the CIA..."CAN'T YOU JUST FUCKING >KILL HIM????"
On Tue, 09 Jan 2024 00:38:08 -0800, The Starmaker ><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
--Does the polls say who are the dead people voting for?
I mean, dead people do vote, right? Just...who are they voting for?
I haven't seen the polls mentioned them.
I know the electoral roll hasn't been updated so that means
the same dead people who voted in the last election will
be voting again...just, i want to know who is their favorite candidate? >>
Do dead people vote by mail or do they
stuffing ballot boxes at night?
Just in case yous people don't know how many registered dead people >>there are...
1.8 million.
How To Rig an Election, Again!
Voter Suppression: This involves efforts to reduce the number of >>eligible voters or make it difficult for certain groups to vote. Tactics
may include restrictive voter ID laws, purging voter rolls, and limiting
polling place accessibility.
Gerrymandering: Manipulating the boundaries of electoral districts >>to favor one political party over another. This can lead to a >>disproportionate representation of certain groups and undermine the >>principle of equal representation.
Fraudulent Voter Registration: Illegitimate registration of voters >>or manipulation of voter registration records to create fictitious >>voters or exclude legitimate ones.
Intimidation and Violence: Coercive tactics, such as physical >>violence or threats, to discourage voters from supporting a particular >>candidate or party.
Media Manipulation: Controlling or influencing media coverage to >>favor one candidate or party over others. This can include biased >>reporting, censorship, or spreading misinformation.
Vote Buying: Offering material incentives or direct payments to >>voters in exchange for their votes, undermining the principle of voting >>based on informed choice.
Manipulation of Ballot Design: Designing ballots in a way that >>confuses or misleads voters, potentially leading to unintentional errors
in voting.
Hacking and Cyber Interference: Tampering with electronic voting >>systems, hacking political party databases, or spreading disinformation >>online to influence public opinion.
Abuse of State Resources: Using government resources, such as public
funds or state-controlled media, to benefit a specific candidate or >>party.
Misuse of Proxy Voting: Allowing voters to cast ballots on behalf of
others without proper authorization, leading to potential abuse.
Voter Roll Manipulation: Purposely adding or removing voters from >>the electoral roll to influence the demographic composition of the >>electorate.
Election Funding Irregularities: Improper use or manipulation of >>campaign finances, including accepting illegal campaign contributions, >>to gain an unfair advantage.
Suppression of Independent Monitoring: Restricting the activities of
independent election observers, both domestic and international, who >>play a crucial role in ensuring transparency and fairness.
Biased Election Administration: Appointing partisan officials to key
positions in electoral commissions, potentially leading to biased >>decision-making and compromised election administration.
Dual Voting: Exploiting weaknesses in voter identification systems >>to allow individuals to vote multiple times using different identities. >>
Infiltration of Political Parties: Infiltrating political parties or
campaigns to gather information or disrupt operations from within.
Misuse of Absentee Voting: Manipulating the process of absentee or >>mail-in voting, including coercion or interception of ballots.
Ethnic and Religious Polarization: Exploiting existing tensions >>between different ethnic or religious groups to sway votes along >>identity lines.
Election Timing Manipulation: Choosing specific election dates to >>strategically benefit one party or disadvantage another, such as >>scheduling elections during a time of crisis for political gain.
Inadequate Electoral Laws: Designing or maintaining electoral laws >>that lack clarity, making it easier to exploit legal loopholes and >>engage in questionable practices.
Fake News and Disinformation Campaigns: Spreading false information >>through traditional media, social media, or other channels to influence >>public opinion and sway voters.
Strategic Candidate Withdrawal: Coordinating the withdrawal of >>certain candidates to consolidate support behind a preferred candidate >>and strategically alter the electoral landscape.
Election Day Irregularities: Deliberately creating chaos or >>disruptions on election day to discourage voter turnout or cast doubt on
the legitimacy of the process.
Misuse of Postal Votes: Manipulating the handling of postal votes, >>including tampering with mail-in ballots or coercing voters to submit >>fraudulent postal votes.
Partisan Polling Stations: Placing polling stations in locations >>favorable to a specific candidate or party, or intentionally creating >>long wait times in areas that are less supportive.
Foreign Interference: Involvement by foreign entities in an attempt >>to influence or manipulate election outcomes, including cyberattacks, >>disinformation campaigns, or financial support.
Selective Law Enforcement: Using law enforcement selectively to >>target opposition candidates or parties, creating an uneven playing >>field.
Disqualification of Opposition Candidates: Employing legal or >>administrative mechanisms to disqualify opposition candidates on >>questionable grounds.
Controlled Opposition: Supporting or creating pseudo-opposition >>parties to divide the opposition vote and prevent a unified challenge. >>
Voter Apathy Promotion: Discrediting the electoral process to foster
a sense of disillusionment and apathy among potential voters.
Election Boycotts: Encouraging or orchestrating a boycott of the >>election to undermine its legitimacy.
Co-option of Electoral Officials: Ensuring that election officials >>are sympathetic to a particular candidate or party, compromising the >>impartiality of the electoral process.
Influencing Candidate Nominations: Manipulating the candidate >>nomination process to exclude strong competitors or ensure weaker >>opponents.
Selective Voter Education: Providing biased or incomplete >>information to voters to manipulate their understanding of candidates, >>issues, or the electoral process.
Manipulation of Election Results: Tampering with the counting and >>reporting of votes to produce inaccurate or fraudulent results.
Election Infrastructure Sabotage: Physically damaging or disrupting >>election infrastructure, such as polling stations or electronic voting >>systems.
Use of Political Bots: Employing automated social media accounts or >>bots to amplify certain narratives, drown out opposition voices, or >>manipulate online discussions.
Identity Politics Exploitation: Manipulating identity-based issues >>to create divisions among voters and consolidate support within specific
demographics.
Selective Voter Mobilization: Targeting specific demographics for >>voter mobilization efforts while neglecting others to manipulate turnout
in favor of a particular candidate or party.
Unfair Access to Media: Providing unequal access to media coverage, >>debates, or advertising opportunities, giving an advantage to one >>candidate or party.
Subtle Voter Intimidation: Rather than overt threats, using subtle
forms of intimidation, such as anonymous messages or veiled warnings, to
discourage voters from supporting a particular candidate.
Selective Provision of Public Goods: Leveraging control over public >>resources to selectively provide benefits or services to areas that >>support a specific candidate or party, influencing voter sentiment.
Strategic Timing of Government Announcements: Timing the release of >>positive government news or policy announcements close to the election >>to influence voter perceptions and sway opinions.
Social Pressure Tactics: Encouraging social norms that favor a >>particular candidate or party, making voters feel pressured to conform >>to the perceived majority opinion.
Cooptation of Civil Society: Infiltrating or co-opting independent >>civil society organizations to manipulate public discourse and influence
voter attitudes.
Infiltration of Opposition Camps: Placing moles or agents within >>opposition parties to gather information, sow discord, or disrupt their >>strategies.
Election Observation Manipulation: Faking or manipulating the >>presence of international election observers to create a false >>appearance of a transparent and fair electoral process.
Strategic Candidate Replacement: Substituting a candidate at a >>critical point in the election process to exploit legal loopholes or >>gain a tactical advantage.
Financial Market Manipulation: Creating or exploiting economic >>uncertainties to influence voter behavior and perceptions, potentially >>using financial markets as a tool.
Manufactured Issue Amplification: Creating or exaggerating specific >>issues to divert attention from critical matters, manipulate public >>discourse, and influence voter priorities.
i almost forgot...a USB stick.
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
the unchallengeable.
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.
So, I look at this guy, Craig-Callaway the expert ballot stuffer, and I see he is a nigger.
I look at his picture, he's a Nigger! (you know, one of those black people)
https://bloximages.chicago2.vip.townnews.com/pressofatlanticcity.com/content/tncms/assets/v3/editorial/0/e6/0e684ca2-7a7b-11ee-865b-87aa8b4b9f47/60be84ff4c35e.image.jpg
ok, where did he learn the ballot stuffing business??? Had to be Whitey!
Didn't anybody tell that nigger don't trust Whitey???
There he go with Whitey! (doing a whitey brace) https://www.njspotlightnews.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/123/2020/11/Jeff-Van-Drew-and-Craig-Callaway.jpg
https://bloximages.chicago2.vip.townnews.com/pressofatlanticcity.com/content/tncms/assets/v3/editorial/c/64/c64bec76-3c79-5a98-a6dd-51eb794f05a0/5fa45eb00a0b2.image.jpg?resize=1200%2C835
https://www.google.com/search?q=Craig+Callaway&sca_esv=8619b7244523f828&tbm=isch&sxsrf=ACQVn0_YA-TaGr5lpCJUTxtBODIS1uXFDg
The Starmaker wrote:
For Immediate Release
U.S. Attorney's Office, District of New Jersey
https://www.justice.gov/usao-nj/pr/political-organizer-and-former-president-city-council-atlantic-city-charged-submitting
Here is a step-by-step of the fraudulent mail-in ballot scheme:
Recruitment and Promise of Payment: Callaway and his associates approach individuals in Atlantic City approximately one month before the November 8, 2022, general election. T
hey promise to pay these individuals $30 to $50 to act as authorized messengers for voters who wish to vote by mail.
Collection of Vote-By-Mail Applications: Callaway or his subordinates provide these recruited messengers with completed Vote-By-Mail Applications.
The messengers then enter the Atlantic County clerk’s office, carrying anywhere from one to four completed applications.
Submission of Applications: The messengers, following instructions from Callaway or his subordinates, provide proof of
identification and sign the Vote-By-Mail Applications in the authorized messenger portion. These applications are then submitted to office personnel at the county clerk's office.
Receiving Mail-In Ballots: If the applications are approved, office personnel provide mail-in ballots for the
voters listed on the applications to the purported messengers.
Breach of Legal Requirements: Under New Jersey law, messengers are required to deliver any mail-in ballots they received directly to
the voters who requested them and certify that they will do so. However, instead of delivering the ballots to the voters, the messengers hand them over to Callaway or his subordinates.
Fraudulent Casting of Ballots: Callaway and his subordinates receive the mail-in ballots collected by the messengers. They proceed to cast
these ballots in the names of individuals who did not actually vote in the 2022 General Election and did not authorize anyone to cast ballots on their behalf.
Ballot Counting: Despite the fraudulent nature of these ballots, many of them are counted towards the election results.
This process involves a series of illegal actions, including bribery, forgery, and violation of election laws, aimed at manipulating
the electoral process and casting fraudulent votes.
"manipulating the electoral process"???? wat does dat mean?
The Starmaker wrote:
NEW - Former President of City Council of Atlantic City charged with submitting fraudulent mail-in ballots.
A criminal complaint accuses Craig Callaway, 64, a political organizer, of illegally obtaining and
casting ballots that were counted in the November 2022 election.
About a month before the election, Callaway and others allegedly paid several individuals to carry
completed Vote-By-Mail applications to the county clerk's office.
Once these individuals received the fraudulent mail-in ballots, they reportedly handed them over to Callaway and his associates.
Many of the mail-in ballots collected in this manner were allegedly cast using the names of
individuals who have since confirmed that they did not vote in the November 2022 election.
Moreover, these individuals have stated that they did not give authorization for
Callaway, his associates, or anyone else to vote on their behalf.
The criminal complaint discloses that a significant number of these fraudulent mail-in ballots were
officially counted in the November 2022 election.
https://twitter.com/i/status/1755069412032553375
The Starmaker wrote:
Now, in today's DrudgeReport
https://www.drudgereport.com/
you see a picture of dat judge...
https://www.cnn.com/2024/01/30/politics/trump-fraud-trial-verdict-what-to-watch-for/index.html
is that judge what you call a ..."co-opting judge"????
I'm not sure exactly the meaning of a "co-opting judge"...
to me it means
sold!
that kind you buy..
the democrats owns his ass.
I'm still not sure what "co-opting judge" means..
but
it sounds to me like a judge you buy but
you have to buy other judges first to get
your ."co-opting judge" bought lock, stock and barrel.
Who can trust a judge who doesn't take money?
On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 22:36:17 -0800, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
I notice that I haven't heard *anywhere* that the Democrats are >planning to cancel the November election, why is that?
Am I delusional?
Am I imagining things?
Maybe the Media are afraid to mention anything that has to do with >election rigging unless somebody else in the media publishes it first.
They are too busy with ...today's news.
I'm a futurists.
So, sticking with today...
what new brick walls
are the Democrats
throwing up in
front of Donald Trump?
I should ask Nancy Pelosi because
she is orchestrating everything, right?
She's on the phone everyday calling the CIA..."CAN'T YOU JUST FUCKING >KILL HIM????"
On Tue, 09 Jan 2024 00:38:08 -0800, The Starmaker ><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
--Does the polls say who are the dead people voting for?
I mean, dead people do vote, right? Just...who are they voting for? >>
I haven't seen the polls mentioned them.
I know the electoral roll hasn't been updated so that means
the same dead people who voted in the last election will
be voting again...just, i want to know who is their favorite candidate?
Do dead people vote by mail or do they
stuffing ballot boxes at night?
Just in case yous people don't know how many registered dead people >>there are...
1.8 million.
How To Rig an Election, Again!
Voter Suppression: This involves efforts to reduce the number of >>eligible voters or make it difficult for certain groups to vote. Tactics
may include restrictive voter ID laws, purging voter rolls, and limiting
polling place accessibility.
Gerrymandering: Manipulating the boundaries of electoral districts
to favor one political party over another. This can lead to a >>disproportionate representation of certain groups and undermine the >>principle of equal representation.
Fraudulent Voter Registration: Illegitimate registration of voters
or manipulation of voter registration records to create fictitious >>voters or exclude legitimate ones.
Intimidation and Violence: Coercive tactics, such as physical >>violence or threats, to discourage voters from supporting a particular
candidate or party.
Media Manipulation: Controlling or influencing media coverage to >>favor one candidate or party over others. This can include biased >>reporting, censorship, or spreading misinformation.
Vote Buying: Offering material incentives or direct payments to >>voters in exchange for their votes, undermining the principle of voting
based on informed choice.
Manipulation of Ballot Design: Designing ballots in a way that >>confuses or misleads voters, potentially leading to unintentional errors
in voting.
Hacking and Cyber Interference: Tampering with electronic voting >>systems, hacking political party databases, or spreading disinformation
online to influence public opinion.
Abuse of State Resources: Using government resources, such as public
funds or state-controlled media, to benefit a specific candidate or >>party.
Misuse of Proxy Voting: Allowing voters to cast ballots on behalf of
others without proper authorization, leading to potential abuse.
Voter Roll Manipulation: Purposely adding or removing voters from >>the electoral roll to influence the demographic composition of the >>electorate.
Election Funding Irregularities: Improper use or manipulation of >>campaign finances, including accepting illegal campaign contributions,
to gain an unfair advantage.
Suppression of Independent Monitoring: Restricting the activities of
independent election observers, both domestic and international, who >>play a crucial role in ensuring transparency and fairness.
Biased Election Administration: Appointing partisan officials to key
positions in electoral commissions, potentially leading to biased >>decision-making and compromised election administration.
Dual Voting: Exploiting weaknesses in voter identification systems
to allow individuals to vote multiple times using different identities.
Infiltration of Political Parties: Infiltrating political parties or
campaigns to gather information or disrupt operations from within.
Misuse of Absentee Voting: Manipulating the process of absentee or
mail-in voting, including coercion or interception of ballots.
Ethnic and Religious Polarization: Exploiting existing tensions >>between different ethnic or religious groups to sway votes along >>identity lines.
Election Timing Manipulation: Choosing specific election dates to >>strategically benefit one party or disadvantage another, such as >>scheduling elections during a time of crisis for political gain.
Inadequate Electoral Laws: Designing or maintaining electoral laws
that lack clarity, making it easier to exploit legal loopholes and >>engage in questionable practices.
Fake News and Disinformation Campaigns: Spreading false information
through traditional media, social media, or other channels to influence
public opinion and sway voters.
Strategic Candidate Withdrawal: Coordinating the withdrawal of >>certain candidates to consolidate support behind a preferred candidate
and strategically alter the electoral landscape.
Election Day Irregularities: Deliberately creating chaos or >>disruptions on election day to discourage voter turnout or cast doubt on
the legitimacy of the process.
Misuse of Postal Votes: Manipulating the handling of postal votes,
including tampering with mail-in ballots or coercing voters to submit >>fraudulent postal votes.
Partisan Polling Stations: Placing polling stations in locations >>favorable to a specific candidate or party, or intentionally creating >>long wait times in areas that are less supportive.
Foreign Interference: Involvement by foreign entities in an attempt
to influence or manipulate election outcomes, including cyberattacks, >>disinformation campaigns, or financial support.
Selective Law Enforcement: Using law enforcement selectively to >>target opposition candidates or parties, creating an uneven playing >>field.
Disqualification of Opposition Candidates: Employing legal or >>administrative mechanisms to disqualify opposition candidates on >>questionable grounds.
Controlled Opposition: Supporting or creating pseudo-opposition >>parties to divide the opposition vote and prevent a unified challenge.
Voter Apathy Promotion: Discrediting the electoral process to foster
a sense of disillusionment and apathy among potential voters.
Election Boycotts: Encouraging or orchestrating a boycott of the >>election to undermine its legitimacy.
Co-option of Electoral Officials: Ensuring that election officials
are sympathetic to a particular candidate or party, compromising the >>impartiality of the electoral process.
Influencing Candidate Nominations: Manipulating the candidate >>nomination process to exclude strong competitors or ensure weaker >>opponents.
Selective Voter Education: Providing biased or incomplete >>information to voters to manipulate their understanding of candidates,
issues, or the electoral process.
Manipulation of Election Results: Tampering with the counting and >>reporting of votes to produce inaccurate or fraudulent results.
Election Infrastructure Sabotage: Physically damaging or disrupting
election infrastructure, such as polling stations or electronic voting
systems.
Use of Political Bots: Employing automated social media accounts or
bots to amplify certain narratives, drown out opposition voices, or >>manipulate online discussions.
Identity Politics Exploitation: Manipulating identity-based issues
to create divisions among voters and consolidate support within specific
demographics.
Selective Voter Mobilization: Targeting specific demographics for >>voter mobilization efforts while neglecting others to manipulate turnout
in favor of a particular candidate or party.
Unfair Access to Media: Providing unequal access to media coverage,
debates, or advertising opportunities, giving an advantage to one >>candidate or party.
Subtle Voter Intimidation: Rather than overt threats, using subtle
forms of intimidation, such as anonymous messages or veiled warnings, to
discourage voters from supporting a particular candidate.
Selective Provision of Public Goods: Leveraging control over public
resources to selectively provide benefits or services to areas that >>support a specific candidate or party, influencing voter sentiment. >>
Strategic Timing of Government Announcements: Timing the release of
positive government news or policy announcements close to the election
to influence voter perceptions and sway opinions.
Social Pressure Tactics: Encouraging social norms that favor a >>particular candidate or party, making voters feel pressured to conform
to the perceived majority opinion.
Cooptation of Civil Society: Infiltrating or co-opting independent
civil society organizations to manipulate public discourse and influence
voter attitudes.
Infiltration of Opposition Camps: Placing moles or agents within >>opposition parties to gather information, sow discord, or disrupt their
strategies.
Election Observation Manipulation: Faking or manipulating the >>presence of international election observers to create a false >>appearance of a transparent and fair electoral process.
Strategic Candidate Replacement: Substituting a candidate at a >>critical point in the election process to exploit legal loopholes or >>gain a tactical advantage.
Financial Market Manipulation: Creating or exploiting economic >>uncertainties to influence voter behavior and perceptions, potentially
using financial markets as a tool.
Manufactured Issue Amplification: Creating or exaggerating specific
issues to divert attention from critical matters, manipulate public >>discourse, and influence voter priorities.
i almost forgot...a USB stick.
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
the unchallengeable.
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.
To vote by messenger ballot, a voter must complete an application
designating a messenger and, if desired, an assistor.
The messenger then obtains the ballot from county election offices, and delivers it to the voter.
The voter may mail the completed ballot or have the messenger or another individual carry the ballot to county election offices.
The system was created for people who are unable to vote by mail due to disability or old age,
Monmouth County Clerk M. Claire French said, although anyone is legally
able to vote by messenger ballot.
In signing the newly required affidavits, messengers certify that they
have met the voters they are assisting;
they are related to the voters or are themselves registered voters in Monmouth County; they will not act as messenger for more than 10 voters;
they will deliver the ballots directly to the voters and not to any
other individuals; and they are not candidates in the election.
Messengers also certify that they are aware that violating the Voting by
Mail statute, which governs messenger ballots, is a crime in the third degree.
---Craig-Callaway will pay you $30.00 messenger ballot, but, but, you
gotta make three trips to get the $30.00
The Starmaker wrote:
So, I look at this guy, Craig-Callaway the expert ballot stuffer, and I see he is a nigger.
I look at his picture, he's a Nigger! (you know, one of those black people)
https://bloximages.chicago2.vip.townnews.com/pressofatlanticcity.com/content/tncms/assets/v3/editorial/0/e6/0e684ca2-7a7b-11ee-865b-87aa8b4b9f47/60be84ff4c35e.image.j
ok, where did he learn the ballot stuffing business??? Had to be Whitey!
Didn't anybody tell that nigger don't trust Whitey???
There he go with Whitey! (doing a whitey brace) https://www.njspotlightnews.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/123/2020/11/Jeff-Van-Drew-and-Craig-Callaway.jpg
https://bloximages.chicago2.vip.townnews.com/pressofatlanticcity.com/content/tncms/assets/v3/editorial/c/64/c64bec76-3c79-5a98-a6dd-51eb794f05a0/5fa45eb00a0b2.image.jpg?resize=1200%2C8
https://www.google.com/search?q=Craig+Callaway&sca_esv=8619b7244523f828&tbm=isch&sxsrf=ACQVn0_YA-TaGr5lpCJUTxtBODIS1uXFDg
The Starmaker wrote:
For Immediate Release
U.S. Attorney's Office, District of New Jersey
https://www.justice.gov/usao-nj/pr/political-organizer-and-former-president-city-council-atlantic-city-charged-submitting
Here is a step-by-step of the fraudulent mail-in ballot scheme:
Recruitment and Promise of Payment: Callaway and his associates approach individuals in Atlantic City approximately one month before the November 8, 2022, general election. T
hey promise to pay these individuals $30 to $50 to act as authorized messengers for voters who wish to vote by mail.
Collection of Vote-By-Mail Applications: Callaway or his subordinates provide these recruited messengers with completed Vote-By-Mail Applications.
The messengers then enter the Atlantic County clerk’s office, carrying anywhere from one to four completed applications.
Submission of Applications: The messengers, following instructions from Callaway or his subordinates, provide proof of
identification and sign the Vote-By-Mail Applications in the authorized messenger portion. These applications are then submitted to office personnel at the county clerk's office.
Receiving Mail-In Ballots: If the applications are approved, office personnel provide mail-in ballots for the
voters listed on the applications to the purported messengers.
Breach of Legal Requirements: Under New Jersey law, messengers are required to deliver any mail-in ballots they received directly to
the voters who requested them and certify that they will do so. However, instead of delivering the ballots to the voters, the messengers hand them over to Callaway or his subordinates.
Fraudulent Casting of Ballots: Callaway and his subordinates receive the mail-in ballots collected by the messengers. They proceed to cast
these ballots in the names of individuals who did not actually vote in the 2022 General Election and did not authorize anyone to cast ballots on their behalf.
Ballot Counting: Despite the fraudulent nature of these ballots, many of them are counted towards the election results.
This process involves a series of illegal actions, including bribery, forgery, and violation of election laws, aimed at manipulating
the electoral process and casting fraudulent votes.
"manipulating the electoral process"???? wat does dat mean?
The Starmaker wrote:
NEW - Former President of City Council of Atlantic City charged with submitting fraudulent mail-in ballots.
A criminal complaint accuses Craig Callaway, 64, a political organizer, of illegally obtaining and
casting ballots that were counted in the November 2022 election.
About a month before the election, Callaway and others allegedly paid several individuals to carry
completed Vote-By-Mail applications to the county clerk's office.
Once these individuals received the fraudulent mail-in ballots, they reportedly handed them over to Callaway and his associates.
Many of the mail-in ballots collected in this manner were allegedly cast
using the names of
individuals who have since confirmed that they did not vote in the November 2022 election.
Moreover, these individuals have stated that they did not give authorization for
Callaway, his associates, or anyone else to vote on their behalf.
The criminal complaint discloses that a significant number of these fraudulent mail-in ballots were
officially counted in the November 2022 election.
https://twitter.com/i/status/1755069412032553375
The Starmaker wrote:
Now, in today's DrudgeReport
https://www.drudgereport.com/
you see a picture of dat judge...
https://www.cnn.com/2024/01/30/politics/trump-fraud-trial-verdict-what-to-watch-for/index.html
is that judge what you call a ..."co-opting judge"????
I'm not sure exactly the meaning of a "co-opting judge"...
to me it means
sold!
that kind you buy..
the democrats owns his ass.
I'm still not sure what "co-opting judge" means..
but
it sounds to me like a judge you buy but
you have to buy other judges first to get
your ."co-opting judge" bought lock, stock and barrel.
Who can trust a judge who doesn't take money?
On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 22:36:17 -0800, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
I notice that I haven't heard *anywhere* that the Democrats are >planning to cancel the November election, why is that?
Am I delusional?
Am I imagining things?
Maybe the Media are afraid to mention anything that has to do with >election rigging unless somebody else in the media publishes it first.
They are too busy with ...today's news.
I'm a futurists.
So, sticking with today...
what new brick walls
are the Democrats
throwing up in
front of Donald Trump?
I should ask Nancy Pelosi because
she is orchestrating everything, right?
She's on the phone everyday calling the CIA..."CAN'T YOU JUST FUCKING
KILL HIM????"
On Tue, 09 Jan 2024 00:38:08 -0800, The Starmaker ><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
--Does the polls say who are the dead people voting for?
I mean, dead people do vote, right? Just...who are they voting for? >>
I haven't seen the polls mentioned them.
I know the electoral roll hasn't been updated so that means
the same dead people who voted in the last election will
be voting again...just, i want to know who is their favorite candidate?
Do dead people vote by mail or do they
stuffing ballot boxes at night?
Just in case yous people don't know how many registered dead people >>there are...
1.8 million.
How To Rig an Election, Again!
Voter Suppression: This involves efforts to reduce the number of
eligible voters or make it difficult for certain groups to vote. Tactics
may include restrictive voter ID laws, purging voter rolls, and limiting
polling place accessibility.
Gerrymandering: Manipulating the boundaries of electoral districts
to favor one political party over another. This can lead to a >>disproportionate representation of certain groups and undermine the >>principle of equal representation.
Fraudulent Voter Registration: Illegitimate registration of voters
or manipulation of voter registration records to create fictitious >>voters or exclude legitimate ones.
Intimidation and Violence: Coercive tactics, such as physical >>violence or threats, to discourage voters from supporting a particular
candidate or party.
Media Manipulation: Controlling or influencing media coverage to
favor one candidate or party over others. This can include biased >>reporting, censorship, or spreading misinformation.
Vote Buying: Offering material incentives or direct payments to >>voters in exchange for their votes, undermining the principle of voting
based on informed choice.
Manipulation of Ballot Design: Designing ballots in a way that >>confuses or misleads voters, potentially leading to unintentional errors
in voting.
Hacking and Cyber Interference: Tampering with electronic voting
systems, hacking political party databases, or spreading disinformation
online to influence public opinion.
Abuse of State Resources: Using government resources, such as public
funds or state-controlled media, to benefit a specific candidate or >>party.
Misuse of Proxy Voting: Allowing voters to cast ballots on behalf of
others without proper authorization, leading to potential abuse.
Voter Roll Manipulation: Purposely adding or removing voters from
the electoral roll to influence the demographic composition of the >>electorate.
Election Funding Irregularities: Improper use or manipulation of
campaign finances, including accepting illegal campaign contributions,
to gain an unfair advantage.
Suppression of Independent Monitoring: Restricting the activities of
independent election observers, both domestic and international, who
play a crucial role in ensuring transparency and fairness.
Biased Election Administration: Appointing partisan officials to key
positions in electoral commissions, potentially leading to biased >>decision-making and compromised election administration.
Dual Voting: Exploiting weaknesses in voter identification systems
to allow individuals to vote multiple times using different identities.
Infiltration of Political Parties: Infiltrating political parties or
campaigns to gather information or disrupt operations from within. >>
Misuse of Absentee Voting: Manipulating the process of absentee or
mail-in voting, including coercion or interception of ballots.
Ethnic and Religious Polarization: Exploiting existing tensions >>between different ethnic or religious groups to sway votes along >>identity lines.
Election Timing Manipulation: Choosing specific election dates to
strategically benefit one party or disadvantage another, such as >>scheduling elections during a time of crisis for political gain.
Inadequate Electoral Laws: Designing or maintaining electoral laws
that lack clarity, making it easier to exploit legal loopholes and >>engage in questionable practices.
Fake News and Disinformation Campaigns: Spreading false information
through traditional media, social media, or other channels to influence
public opinion and sway voters.
Strategic Candidate Withdrawal: Coordinating the withdrawal of >>certain candidates to consolidate support behind a preferred candidate
and strategically alter the electoral landscape.
Election Day Irregularities: Deliberately creating chaos or >>disruptions on election day to discourage voter turnout or cast doubt on
the legitimacy of the process.
Misuse of Postal Votes: Manipulating the handling of postal votes,
including tampering with mail-in ballots or coercing voters to submit
fraudulent postal votes.
Partisan Polling Stations: Placing polling stations in locations
favorable to a specific candidate or party, or intentionally creating
long wait times in areas that are less supportive.
Foreign Interference: Involvement by foreign entities in an attempt
to influence or manipulate election outcomes, including cyberattacks,
disinformation campaigns, or financial support.
Selective Law Enforcement: Using law enforcement selectively to >>target opposition candidates or parties, creating an uneven playing >>field.
Disqualification of Opposition Candidates: Employing legal or >>administrative mechanisms to disqualify opposition candidates on >>questionable grounds.
Controlled Opposition: Supporting or creating pseudo-opposition >>parties to divide the opposition vote and prevent a unified challenge.
Voter Apathy Promotion: Discrediting the electoral process to foster
a sense of disillusionment and apathy among potential voters.
Election Boycotts: Encouraging or orchestrating a boycott of the
election to undermine its legitimacy.
Co-option of Electoral Officials: Ensuring that election officials
are sympathetic to a particular candidate or party, compromising the
impartiality of the electoral process.
Influencing Candidate Nominations: Manipulating the candidate >>nomination process to exclude strong competitors or ensure weaker >>opponents.
Selective Voter Education: Providing biased or incomplete >>information to voters to manipulate their understanding of candidates,
issues, or the electoral process.
Manipulation of Election Results: Tampering with the counting and
reporting of votes to produce inaccurate or fraudulent results.
Election Infrastructure Sabotage: Physically damaging or disrupting
election infrastructure, such as polling stations or electronic voting
systems.
Use of Political Bots: Employing automated social media accounts or
bots to amplify certain narratives, drown out opposition voices, or >>manipulate online discussions.
Identity Politics Exploitation: Manipulating identity-based issues
to create divisions among voters and consolidate support within specific
demographics.
Selective Voter Mobilization: Targeting specific demographics for
voter mobilization efforts while neglecting others to manipulate turnout
in favor of a particular candidate or party.
Unfair Access to Media: Providing unequal access to media coverage,
debates, or advertising opportunities, giving an advantage to one >>candidate or party.
Subtle Voter Intimidation: Rather than overt threats, using subtle
forms of intimidation, such as anonymous messages or veiled warnings, to
discourage voters from supporting a particular candidate.
Selective Provision of Public Goods: Leveraging control over public
resources to selectively provide benefits or services to areas that >>support a specific candidate or party, influencing voter sentiment. >>
Strategic Timing of Government Announcements: Timing the release of
positive government news or policy announcements close to the election
to influence voter perceptions and sway opinions.
Social Pressure Tactics: Encouraging social norms that favor a >>particular candidate or party, making voters feel pressured to conform
to the perceived majority opinion.
Cooptation of Civil Society: Infiltrating or co-opting independent
civil society organizations to manipulate public discourse and influence
voter attitudes.
Infiltration of Opposition Camps: Placing moles or agents within
opposition parties to gather information, sow discord, or disrupt their
strategies.
Election Observation Manipulation: Faking or manipulating the >>presence of international election observers to create a false >>appearance of a transparent and fair electoral process.
Strategic Candidate Replacement: Substituting a candidate at a >>critical point in the election process to exploit legal loopholes or
gain a tactical advantage.
Financial Market Manipulation: Creating or exploiting economic >>uncertainties to influence voter behavior and perceptions, potentially
using financial markets as a tool.
Manufactured Issue Amplification: Creating or exaggerating specific
issues to divert attention from critical matters, manipulate public >>discourse, and influence voter priorities.
i almost forgot...a USB stick.
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
the unchallengeable.
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.
U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders.
Sanders camp wants messenger ballot limit raised from 3 to 10
Bernie Sanders’ New Jersey campaign wants Gov. Phil Murphy to raise the limit on authorized messenger ballots from three to ten for the July 7 primary election, which will be conducted almost entirely through vote-by-mail ballots.
https://newjerseyglobe.com/campaigns/sanders-camp-wants-messenger-ballot-limit-raised-from-3-to-10/
So, U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders likes a Rig election?
wat a scumbag!
"Where's my $30.00????"
The Starmaker wrote:
To vote by messenger ballot, a voter must complete an application designating a messenger and, if desired, an assistor.
The messenger then obtains the ballot from county election offices, and delivers it to the voter.
The voter may mail the completed ballot or have the messenger or another individual carry the ballot to county election offices.
The system was created for people who are unable to vote by mail due to disability or old age,
Monmouth County Clerk M. Claire French said, although anyone is legally able to vote by messenger ballot.
In signing the newly required affidavits, messengers certify that they
have met the voters they are assisting;
they are related to the voters or are themselves registered voters in Monmouth County; they will not act as messenger for more than 10 voters; they will deliver the ballots directly to the voters and not to any
other individuals; and they are not candidates in the election.
Messengers also certify that they are aware that violating the Voting by Mail statute, which governs messenger ballots, is a crime in the third degree.
---Craig-Callaway will pay you $30.00 messenger ballot, but, but, you gotta make three trips to get the $30.00
The Starmaker wrote:
So, I look at this guy, Craig-Callaway the expert ballot stuffer, and I see he is a nigger.
I look at his picture, he's a Nigger! (you know, one of those black people)
https://bloximages.chicago2.vip.townnews.com/pressofatlanticcity.com/content/tncms/assets/v3/editorial/0/e6/0e684ca2-7a7b-11ee-865b-87aa8b4b9f47/60be84ff4c35e.ima
ok, where did he learn the ballot stuffing business??? Had to be Whitey!
Didn't anybody tell that nigger don't trust Whitey???
There he go with Whitey! (doing a whitey brace) https://www.njspotlightnews.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/123/2020/11/Jeff-Van-Drew-and-Craig-Callaway.jpg
https://bloximages.chicago2.vip.townnews.com/pressofatlanticcity.com/content/tncms/assets/v3/editorial/c/64/c64bec76-3c79-5a98-a6dd-51eb794f05a0/5fa45eb00a0b2.image.jpg?resize=1200
https://www.google.com/search?q=Craig+Callaway&sca_esv=8619b7244523f828&tbm=isch&sxsrf=ACQVn0_YA-TaGr5lpCJUTxtBODIS1uXFDg
The Starmaker wrote:
For Immediate Release
U.S. Attorney's Office, District of New Jersey
https://www.justice.gov/usao-nj/pr/political-organizer-and-former-president-city-council-atlantic-city-charged-submitting
Here is a step-by-step of the fraudulent mail-in ballot scheme:
Recruitment and Promise of Payment: Callaway and his associates approach individuals in Atlantic City approximately one month before the November 8, 2022, general election. T
hey promise to pay these individuals $30 to $50 to act as authorized messengers for voters who wish to vote by mail.
Collection of Vote-By-Mail Applications: Callaway or his subordinates provide these recruited messengers with completed Vote-By-Mail Applications.
The messengers then enter the Atlantic County clerk’s office, carrying anywhere from one to four completed applications.
Submission of Applications: The messengers, following instructions from Callaway or his subordinates, provide proof of
identification and sign the Vote-By-Mail Applications in the authorized messenger portion. These applications are then submitted to office personnel at the county clerk's office.
Receiving Mail-In Ballots: If the applications are approved, office personnel provide mail-in ballots for the
voters listed on the applications to the purported messengers.
Breach of Legal Requirements: Under New Jersey law, messengers are required to deliver any mail-in ballots they received directly to
the voters who requested them and certify that they will do so. However, instead of delivering the ballots to the voters, the messengers hand them over to Callaway or his subordinates.
Fraudulent Casting of Ballots: Callaway and his subordinates receive the mail-in ballots collected by the messengers. They proceed to cast
these ballots in the names of individuals who did not actually vote in the 2022 General Election and did not authorize anyone to cast ballots on their behalf.
Ballot Counting: Despite the fraudulent nature of these ballots, many of them are counted towards the election results.
This process involves a series of illegal actions, including bribery, forgery, and violation of election laws, aimed at manipulating
the electoral process and casting fraudulent votes.
"manipulating the electoral process"???? wat does dat mean?
The Starmaker wrote:
NEW - Former President of City Council of Atlantic City charged with submitting fraudulent mail-in ballots.
A criminal complaint accuses Craig Callaway, 64, a political organizer,
of illegally obtaining and
casting ballots that were counted in the November 2022 election.
About a month before the election, Callaway and others allegedly paid several individuals to carry
completed Vote-By-Mail applications to the county clerk's office.
Once these individuals received the fraudulent mail-in ballots, they reportedly handed them over to Callaway and his associates.
Many of the mail-in ballots collected in this manner were allegedly cast
using the names of
individuals who have since confirmed that they did not vote in the November 2022 election.
Moreover, these individuals have stated that they did not give authorization for
Callaway, his associates, or anyone else to vote on their behalf.
The criminal complaint discloses that a significant number of these fraudulent mail-in ballots were
officially counted in the November 2022 election.
https://twitter.com/i/status/1755069412032553375
The Starmaker wrote:
Now, in today's DrudgeReport
https://www.drudgereport.com/
you see a picture of dat judge...
https://www.cnn.com/2024/01/30/politics/trump-fraud-trial-verdict-what-to-watch-for/index.html
is that judge what you call a ..."co-opting judge"????
I'm not sure exactly the meaning of a "co-opting judge"...
to me it means
sold!
that kind you buy..
the democrats owns his ass.
I'm still not sure what "co-opting judge" means..
but
it sounds to me like a judge you buy but
you have to buy other judges first to get
your ."co-opting judge" bought lock, stock and barrel.
Who can trust a judge who doesn't take money?
On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 22:36:17 -0800, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
I notice that I haven't heard *anywhere* that the Democrats are >planning to cancel the November election, why is that?
Am I delusional?
Am I imagining things?
Maybe the Media are afraid to mention anything that has to do with >election rigging unless somebody else in the media publishes it first.
They are too busy with ...today's news.
I'm a futurists.
So, sticking with today...
what new brick walls
are the Democrats
throwing up in
front of Donald Trump?
I should ask Nancy Pelosi because
she is orchestrating everything, right?
She's on the phone everyday calling the CIA..."CAN'T YOU JUST FUCKING
KILL HIM????"
On Tue, 09 Jan 2024 00:38:08 -0800, The Starmaker ><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
--Does the polls say who are the dead people voting for?
I mean, dead people do vote, right? Just...who are they voting for?
I haven't seen the polls mentioned them.
I know the electoral roll hasn't been updated so that means
the same dead people who voted in the last election will
be voting again...just, i want to know who is their favorite candidate?
Do dead people vote by mail or do they
stuffing ballot boxes at night?
Just in case yous people don't know how many registered dead people
there are...
1.8 million.
How To Rig an Election, Again!
Voter Suppression: This involves efforts to reduce the number of
eligible voters or make it difficult for certain groups to vote. Tactics
may include restrictive voter ID laws, purging voter rolls, and limiting
polling place accessibility.
Gerrymandering: Manipulating the boundaries of electoral districts
to favor one political party over another. This can lead to a >>disproportionate representation of certain groups and undermine the
principle of equal representation.
Fraudulent Voter Registration: Illegitimate registration of voters
or manipulation of voter registration records to create fictitious
voters or exclude legitimate ones.
Intimidation and Violence: Coercive tactics, such as physical >>violence or threats, to discourage voters from supporting a particular
candidate or party.
Media Manipulation: Controlling or influencing media coverage to
favor one candidate or party over others. This can include biased >>reporting, censorship, or spreading misinformation.
Vote Buying: Offering material incentives or direct payments to
voters in exchange for their votes, undermining the principle of voting
based on informed choice.
Manipulation of Ballot Design: Designing ballots in a way that
confuses or misleads voters, potentially leading to unintentional errors
in voting.
Hacking and Cyber Interference: Tampering with electronic voting
systems, hacking political party databases, or spreading disinformation
online to influence public opinion.
Abuse of State Resources: Using government resources, such as public
funds or state-controlled media, to benefit a specific candidate or
party.
Misuse of Proxy Voting: Allowing voters to cast ballots on behalf of
others without proper authorization, leading to potential abuse. >>
Voter Roll Manipulation: Purposely adding or removing voters from
the electoral roll to influence the demographic composition of the
electorate.
Election Funding Irregularities: Improper use or manipulation of
campaign finances, including accepting illegal campaign contributions,
to gain an unfair advantage.
Suppression of Independent Monitoring: Restricting the activities of
independent election observers, both domestic and international, who
play a crucial role in ensuring transparency and fairness.
Biased Election Administration: Appointing partisan officials to key
positions in electoral commissions, potentially leading to biased >>decision-making and compromised election administration.
Dual Voting: Exploiting weaknesses in voter identification systems
to allow individuals to vote multiple times using different identities.
Infiltration of Political Parties: Infiltrating political parties or
campaigns to gather information or disrupt operations from within.
Misuse of Absentee Voting: Manipulating the process of absentee or
mail-in voting, including coercion or interception of ballots.
Ethnic and Religious Polarization: Exploiting existing tensions
between different ethnic or religious groups to sway votes along >>identity lines.
Election Timing Manipulation: Choosing specific election dates to
strategically benefit one party or disadvantage another, such as >>scheduling elections during a time of crisis for political gain. >>
Inadequate Electoral Laws: Designing or maintaining electoral laws
that lack clarity, making it easier to exploit legal loopholes and
engage in questionable practices.
Fake News and Disinformation Campaigns: Spreading false information
through traditional media, social media, or other channels to influence
public opinion and sway voters.
Strategic Candidate Withdrawal: Coordinating the withdrawal of
certain candidates to consolidate support behind a preferred candidate
and strategically alter the electoral landscape.
Election Day Irregularities: Deliberately creating chaos or >>disruptions on election day to discourage voter turnout or cast doubt on
the legitimacy of the process.
Misuse of Postal Votes: Manipulating the handling of postal votes,
including tampering with mail-in ballots or coercing voters to submit
fraudulent postal votes.
Partisan Polling Stations: Placing polling stations in locations
favorable to a specific candidate or party, or intentionally creating
long wait times in areas that are less supportive.
Foreign Interference: Involvement by foreign entities in an attempt
to influence or manipulate election outcomes, including cyberattacks,
disinformation campaigns, or financial support.
Selective Law Enforcement: Using law enforcement selectively to
target opposition candidates or parties, creating an uneven playing
field.
Disqualification of Opposition Candidates: Employing legal or >>administrative mechanisms to disqualify opposition candidates on >>questionable grounds.
Controlled Opposition: Supporting or creating pseudo-opposition
parties to divide the opposition vote and prevent a unified challenge.
Voter Apathy Promotion: Discrediting the electoral process to foster
a sense of disillusionment and apathy among potential voters.
Election Boycotts: Encouraging or orchestrating a boycott of the
election to undermine its legitimacy.
Co-option of Electoral Officials: Ensuring that election officials
are sympathetic to a particular candidate or party, compromising the
impartiality of the electoral process.
Influencing Candidate Nominations: Manipulating the candidate >>nomination process to exclude strong competitors or ensure weaker >>opponents.
Selective Voter Education: Providing biased or incomplete >>information to voters to manipulate their understanding of candidates,
issues, or the electoral process.
Manipulation of Election Results: Tampering with the counting and
reporting of votes to produce inaccurate or fraudulent results. >>
Election Infrastructure Sabotage: Physically damaging or disrupting
election infrastructure, such as polling stations or electronic voting
systems.
Use of Political Bots: Employing automated social media accounts or
bots to amplify certain narratives, drown out opposition voices, or
manipulate online discussions.
Identity Politics Exploitation: Manipulating identity-based issues
to create divisions among voters and consolidate support within specific
demographics.
Selective Voter Mobilization: Targeting specific demographics for
voter mobilization efforts while neglecting others to manipulate turnout
in favor of a particular candidate or party.
Unfair Access to Media: Providing unequal access to media coverage,
debates, or advertising opportunities, giving an advantage to one >>candidate or party.
Subtle Voter Intimidation: Rather than overt threats, using subtle
forms of intimidation, such as anonymous messages or veiled warnings, to
discourage voters from supporting a particular candidate.
Selective Provision of Public Goods: Leveraging control over public
resources to selectively provide benefits or services to areas that
support a specific candidate or party, influencing voter sentiment.
Strategic Timing of Government Announcements: Timing the release of
positive government news or policy announcements close to the election
to influence voter perceptions and sway opinions.
Social Pressure Tactics: Encouraging social norms that favor a
particular candidate or party, making voters feel pressured to conform
to the perceived majority opinion.
Cooptation of Civil Society: Infiltrating or co-opting independent
civil society organizations to manipulate public discourse and influence
voter attitudes.
Infiltration of Opposition Camps: Placing moles or agents within
opposition parties to gather information, sow discord, or disrupt their
strategies.
Election Observation Manipulation: Faking or manipulating the >>presence of international election observers to create a false >>appearance of a transparent and fair electoral process.
Strategic Candidate Replacement: Substituting a candidate at a
critical point in the election process to exploit legal loopholes or
gain a tactical advantage.
Financial Market Manipulation: Creating or exploiting economic
uncertainties to influence voter behavior and perceptions, potentially
using financial markets as a tool.
Manufactured Issue Amplification: Creating or exaggerating specific
issues to divert attention from critical matters, manipulate public
discourse, and influence voter priorities.
i almost forgot...a USB stick.
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
the unchallengeable.
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 300 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 105:53:56 |
| Calls: | 6,700 |
| Files: | 12,232 |
| Messages: | 5,350,363 |
