On Sunday, November 5, 2023 at 12:58:35 PM UTC-5, Arindam Banerjee wrote:If you go through my earlier posts, you will find the video for each of the graphs.
https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=7558701444157587&set=pcb.7558707940823604
The underlying data for the violation of inertia graphs (1 to 6) that I have been presenting recently are shown here.I'm not redong the experiment.
I would very much like all interested parties to re-do the experiments I have shown.
[]
At least, the data that I have presented needs to be checked.Yes, I'll do that.
The consequences of my experiements are profound.We'll see.
The two second video film contains all the informaation.[]
therre is no video on your FB link, just photos.
Your experimental method is unclear. I have some questions:
For every frame, the position of the armature with respect to the scale is noted - somewhat roughly I am afraid.Is the scale the yellow level? Why didn't you use a meter stick or tape measure???
Is the armature the metal bar?
Then the position of the gun is also noted, from the pointer and the scale.Is the gun the wooden platform?
Knowing the masses of the armature and the gun,But you did not report the values of the masses, so those values cannot be verified in your data.
the position of the centre of mass for the whole system is calculated.
What are the masses
The below is the raw data. For the graphs the values have been initialised from zero,Where are the graphs? They are not on FB.
that is, the first value of time is set to zero, and from the rest of the time values, subtracted.How do you justify 10 digits in the center of mass values?
Same process is done for the other columns. Thus the position values for the armature, gun
and the centre of mass are obtained with respect to time.
The center of mass is changing, so I think you left something out of the data.
(It seems that you do not include the motion of the rollers under the gun?)
The velocity values are obtained knowing the time, the position and the state of the gunAnd why do the values for positions of Armature and gun have more digits near the end of the dataset?
following the notes relating to how long the armature was on the rails, when it hit the arrestors, etc.
What UNITS for each column?
are the Time values in units of frame number??? or milliseconds? or something else?
are the position values in inches? cm? or something else?
Time armature gun centre of mass notes[]
4800 67 80 72.96239316
4870 66 80 72.70769231
4900 65 80 72.45299145
4930 64 81 72.94358974 spark on rail
4970 63 81 72.68888889
5000 62 81.5 72.80683761
7170 -6.25 79.75 54.11923077There's not enough information to work this out.
7200 -6.5 79.5 53.86923077
7230 -6.75 79.25 53.61923077
7270 -6.9 79.1 53.46923077
7300 -7 79 53.36923077
Ed
On Thursday, 9 November 2023 at 07:39:13 UTC+11, edpr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday, November 5, 2023 at 12:58:35 PM UTC-5, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=7558701444157587&set=pcb.7558707940823604
If you go through my earlier posts, you will find the video for each of the graphs.The underlying data for the violation of inertia graphs (1 to 6) that I have been presenting recently are shown here.I'm not redong the experiment.
I would very much like all interested parties to re-do the experiments I have shown.
[]
At least, the data that I have presented needs to be checked.Yes, I'll do that.
The consequences of my experiements are profound.We'll see.
The two second video film contains all the informaation.[]
therre is no video on your FB link, just photos.
In my earlier posts here, the link to the graphs and videos were present. The two second video film has been split into 30-40ms sections.
Your experimental method is unclear. I have some questions:
For every frame, the position of the armature with respect to the scale is noted - somewhat roughly I am afraid.Is the scale the yellow level? Why didn't you use a meter stick or tape measure???
It is a meter stick that is used, with red tape marking 10cm distances. .
Is the armature the metal bar?
It is a heavy *cylinder* which rolls on the rails.
(By bar I understand a squarish sort of object).
Yes, ultimately we need bars instead of cylinders for much higher efficiency, but that is another story. Plenty of complications there relating to contact resistances and welding need to be sorted out. At present, beyond my scope.
Then the position of the gun is also noted, from the pointer and the scale.Is the gun the wooden platform?
It is the big wooden thing that moves backwards, then forwards on the rollers.
Knowing the masses of the armature and the gun,But you did not report the values of the masses, so those values cannot be verified in your data.
the position of the centre of mass for the whole system is calculated.
What are the masses
They were mentioned in the information mentioned earlier in this series. Anyway:
The mass of the armature is 2980 gm.
The mass of the gun is 8720gm.
The below is the raw data. For the graphs the values have been initialised from zero,Where are the graphs? They are not on FB.
You have to go to my facebook timeline. They are all there.
I will make a new post with all the links to the graphs, and post it here.
that is, the first value of time is set to zero, and from the rest of the time values, subtracted.How do you justify 10 digits in the center of mass values?
Same process is done for the other columns. Thus the position values for the armature, gun
and the centre of mass are obtained with respect to time.
Excel is used to get the values of the centre of mass values with respect to time, and generates 10 digits from the values given.
The graphs evidently do not need the 10 digit values.
The center of mass is changing, so I think you left something out of the data.
The position and the velocity of the armature and gun are changing with time, yes, and that comes from the raw data.
The centre of mass is calculated from their positions and masses.
(It seems that you do not include the motion of the rollers under the gun?)
The rollers are there to reduce friction between the gun and the ground. They are not part of the gun. They are light but hard plastic tubes used in plumbing.
Ideally this experiment should be performed in outer space where there is no friction, and where the gun-motor will be used in the future.
But as we are on Earth, we have to do what it takes to minimise the friction. The rollers help in that.
The velocity values are obtained knowing the time, the position and the state of the gunAnd why do the values for positions of Armature and gun have more digits near the end of the dataset?
following the notes relating to how long the armature was on the rails, when it hit the arrestors, etc.
Don't see any lack of consistency in the dataset.
What UNITS for each column?
milliseconds for the first column.
cm for the others.
That should have been obvious from the snapshots.
are the Time values in units of frame number??? or milliseconds? or something else?
Milliseconds.
are the position values in inches? cm? or something else?
cm
Time armature gun centre of mass notes[]
4800 67 80 72.96239316
4870 66 80 72.70769231
4900 65 80 72.45299145
4930 64 81 72.94358974 spark on rail
4970 63 81 72.68888889
5000 62 81.5 72.80683761
7170 -6.25 79.75 54.11923077There's not enough information to work this out.
7200 -6.5 79.5 53.86923077
7230 -6.75 79.25 53.61923077
7270 -6.9 79.1 53.46923077
7300 -7 79 53.36923077
Towards the end, the armature has gone off beyond the scale, but not to worry, from the pointer to the scale we can work out how much it has exceeded the range, so the negative sign for the position.
Hope my answers helped.
Basically I put up the snaps and the data to make people see the validity of the data from the experiment which in turn would lead to understanding the graphs posted eariier in my facebook timeline.
I will put in all the links in one post and publish that here, to make things easier.
Ed
Thanks for your interest.
***
What needs to be understood is that the centre of mass moves violating inertia and consequently revising the basics of physics.
***
Once that is clear, the road to making new motors for faster than light travel will be clear.
Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee
On Thursday, November 9, 2023 at 1:05:40 AM UTC-5, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
On Thursday, 9 November 2023 at 07:39:13 UTC+11, edpr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday, November 5, 2023 at 12:58:35 PM UTC-5, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=7558701444157587&set=pcb.7558707940823604
If you go through my earlier posts, you will find the video for each of the graphs.The underlying data for the violation of inertia graphs (1 to 6) that I have been presenting recently are shown here.I'm not redong the experiment.
I would very much like all interested parties to re-do the experiments I have shown.
[]
At least, the data that I have presented needs to be checked.Yes, I'll do that.
The consequences of my experiements are profound.We'll see.
The two second video film contains all the informaation.[]
therre is no video on your FB link, just photos.
In my earlier posts here, the link to the graphs and videos were present. The two second video film has been split into 30-40ms sections.
Your experimental method is unclear. I have some questions:
For every frame, the position of the armature with respect to the scale is noted - somewhat roughly I am afraid.Is the scale the yellow level? Why didn't you use a meter stick or tape measure???
It is a meter stick that is used, with red tape marking 10cm distances. .
Is the armature the metal bar?
It is a heavy *cylinder* which rolls on the rails.
(By bar I understand a squarish sort of object).
Yes, ultimately we need bars instead of cylinders for much higher efficiency, but that is another story. Plenty of complications there relating to contact resistances and welding need to be sorted out. At present, beyond my scope.
Then the position of the gun is also noted, from the pointer and the scale.Is the gun the wooden platform?
It is the big wooden thing that moves backwards, then forwards on the rollers.
Knowing the masses of the armature and the gun,But you did not report the values of the masses, so those values cannot be verified in your data.
the position of the centre of mass for the whole system is calculated.
What are the masses
They were mentioned in the information mentioned earlier in this series. Anyway:
The mass of the armature is 2980 gm.
The mass of the gun is 8720gm.
The below is the raw data. For the graphs the values have been initialised from zero,Where are the graphs? They are not on FB.
You have to go to my facebook timeline. They are all there.
I will make a new post with all the links to the graphs, and post it here.
that is, the first value of time is set to zero, and from the rest of the time values, subtracted.How do you justify 10 digits in the center of mass values?
Same process is done for the other columns. Thus the position values for the armature, gun
and the centre of mass are obtained with respect to time.
Excel is used to get the values of the centre of mass values with respect to time, and generates 10 digits from the values given.
The graphs evidently do not need the 10 digit values.
The center of mass is changing, so I think you left something out of the data.
The position and the velocity of the armature and gun are changing with time, yes, and that comes from the raw data.
The centre of mass is calculated from their positions and masses.
(It seems that you do not include the motion of the rollers under the gun?)
The rollers are there to reduce friction between the gun and the ground. They are not part of the gun. They are light but hard plastic tubes used in plumbing.
Ideally this experiment should be performed in outer space where there is no friction, and where the gun-motor will be used in the future.
But as we are on Earth, we have to do what it takes to minimise the friction. The rollers help in that.
The velocity values are obtained knowing the time, the position and the state of the gunAnd why do the values for positions of Armature and gun have more digits near the end of the dataset?
following the notes relating to how long the armature was on the rails, when it hit the arrestors, etc.
Don't see any lack of consistency in the dataset.
What UNITS for each column?
milliseconds for the first column.
cm for the others.
That should have been obvious from the snapshots.
are the Time values in units of frame number??? or milliseconds? or something else?
Milliseconds.
are the position values in inches? cm? or something else?
cm
Time armature gun centre of mass notes[]
4800 67 80 72.96239316
4870 66 80 72.70769231
4900 65 80 72.45299145
4930 64 81 72.94358974 spark on rail
4970 63 81 72.68888889
5000 62 81.5 72.80683761
7170 -6.25 79.75 54.11923077There's not enough information to work this out.
7200 -6.5 79.5 53.86923077
7230 -6.75 79.25 53.61923077
7270 -6.9 79.1 53.46923077
7300 -7 79 53.36923077
Towards the end, the armature has gone off beyond the scale, but not to worry, from the pointer to the scale we can work out how much it has exceeded the range, so the negative sign for the position.
Hope my answers helped.
Basically I put up the snaps and the data to make people see the validity of the data from the experiment which in turn would lead to understanding the graphs posted eariier in my facebook timeline.
I will put in all the links in one post and publish that here, to make things easier.
Ed
Thanks for your interest.I will look at this a little more. This is how science is supposed to work.
***
What needs to be understood is that the centre of mass moves violating inertia and consequently revising the basics of physics.
***
Once that is clear, the road to making new motors for faster than light travel will be clear.
Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee
But I have a new work assignment beginning next week, so I cannot spend
much time on this. Going back and forth like this is not very efficient.
I have a suggestion for you: write up your experiment in a proper lab report format that includes all the information about the lab equipment (measurement
devices, power supplies, materials), the procedure for running the experiment
(how to set up for the test, how to start and run the device, etc.), and the results
(nice that you include the raw data like the video). You might have to include
the video separately, but everything else could be in a document (PDF).
Doing that is much better for someone to review your results or, as you also requested, to try to reproduce the results. I still do not have the time or work
area to reproduce this experiment.
It is nice to have a productive discussion like this. Lets keep it up and be a good example for others.
Talk to you later,
Ed
Spam mill echo chamber, that is Arindam Banerjee a decades long spammer of sci.physics with his hatred of science and the method of science. Hate, hate, anger and hate.
Is Arindam Banerjee the reason ITT fails to have a Nobel winner in chemistry or physics? Like Arindam, his hatred of science is glooming large with his constant hatred of science-- Apollo 11 was a staged hoax, Sun core is a frigid near 0 Kelvin, theman is a lunatic of science, perhaps reflecting why India fails to achieve science honors.
+Proving Water is H4O, not H2O, and where hydroxyl is H2O// AP's 250th book TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY, by Archimedes Plutonium Now I see some of these electronic weighing scales are accurate to 0.00001 gram. I do not know if that is within
3m views Proving Water is H4O, not H2O, and where hydroxyl is H2O// AP's 250th book TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY, by Archimedes Plutonium
Now I see some of these electronic weighing scales are accurate to 0.00001 gram. I do not know if that is within the accuracy I need for weighing a test tube of oxygen then a test tube of hydrogen from water electrolysis.
proton+muon. Thus, water molecule is not H2O but rather is H4O.Proving Water is H4O, not H2O, and where hydroxyl is H2O// AP's 250th book TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY, by Archimedes Plutonium
In Old Chemistry and Old Physics, their subatomic particles were do nothing and no function and no job particles that sit around as balls or whiz around the outside of balls doing nothing but pointless circling.
In New Physics and New Chemistry-- All is Atom and Atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism. Every subatomic particle has a job a function a purpose as to the Laws of Electromagnetism--- Faraday law, Coulomb law, Ampere law, Capacitor law.
A proton is a torus of 840MeV with 840 windings, while the muon is the true electron of Atoms and is encased inside the proton torus thrusting through and producing electricity-- magnetic monopoles.
The neutron of Atoms is a parallel plate capacitor storing the electricity of proton+muon and is skin cover on the outside of the proton torus in the form of parallel plates.
Can hydrogen be a Atom if it is just a proton+muon? No, all atoms require to have a capacitor such as at least one neutron. Thus the Hydrogen Atom is H2 where you have 2 proton+muon where 1 of the 2 proton+muon acts like a neutron to the other
oxygen and hydrogen".AP is waiting for experimental chemists and physicists to prove him correct that Water is H4O.
In the meantime we have Hydroxyl which in Old Chemistry, especially Biology is OH, while AP says that is wrong and that is really H2O.
Now glycerine is a hydroxyl with formula C3H8O3. And what I am thinking at this moment, is that hydroxyls will be an easier proof that Water is truly H4O, rather than wait for experimentalists to actually "weigh the electrolysis test tubes of
You see, with H4O as water, glycerine is C3(2 waters)O with an extra oxygen. If Water is H2O then glycerine is C3(4 waters) deficit O. It is missing an oxygen if water is H2O.
The reason glycerine is so effective as a skin ointment is because it has glycerine, the extra O oxygen. If water were H2O, then glycerine would be a missing oxygen and not a skin lotion that works, but makes skin even more dry.
Proving Water is H4O, not H2O, and where hydroxyl is H2O// AP's 250th book TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY, by Archimedes Plutonium
proportionality constant Z can be used:--- quoting in part from source-- Study.com ---
Perhaps there is only two Faraday laws on Electrolysis. I am looking at the one that states: Faraday's first law of electrolysis relates the mass of a substance liberated (or deposited) at an electrode to the electric charge used (Q). A
m = ZQ = (E/96485)(Q)
m = mass, Q = total charge rewritten as Q = I*t amperes x time in seconds.
This website gives an example: 5amps passed through molten Sodium Chloride for 3 hours. Calculate the mass of Sodium. E=23/1.
m = (23/96485) (5) (3*60*60) approx 12.87 grams.
--- end quoting in part from source-- Study.com ---
Now has such a experiment been performed on Water to see how much atomic mass of hydrogen and of oxygen results??? If AP is correct, the formula of water is H4O, if Old Physics, Old Chemistry is correct the formula is H2O. So which is it???
AP
No, sorry no, Faraday's Law of Electrolysis is not going to tell the correct mass of hydrogen.
Reading Wikipedia on Faraday's Electrolysis law.
--- quoting Wikipedia ---
A monovalent ion requires 1 electron for discharge, a divalent ion requires 2 electrons for discharge and so on. Thus, if x electrons flow,
x/v atoms are discharged.
So the mass m discharged is
m= (xM)/vN_A) = (QM)/(eN_A *v) = (QM) / (vF)
where
N_A is the Avogadro constant;
Q = xe is the total charge, equal to the number of electrons (x) times the elementary charge e;
F is the Faraday constant.
--- end quoting Wikipedia ---
No, the Faraday law of Electrolysis will not work on water with a correct answer, because H is not an atom but H2 is an Atom. And where one of the proton+muon converts to being a neutron to the other proton+muon.
So if Faraday's law of Electrolysis was applied to water, thinking it would deliver a true answer is mistaken because the one H converts to neutron.
So it appears that we need to directly measure the test tube of oxygen and the test tube of hydrogen by a direct mass measurement.
where H2 gets that expansion characteristic.I doubt we can measure a test tube of hydrogen or test tube of oxygen, too small to determine the mass on some sort of weight scale.
But here is a possible lucrative idea. We should be able to get pure deuterium water. Then run the electrolysis. Collect the test tubes.
Now have some sort of balancing beam weight scale. Place the regular water of hydrogen test tube on one side, and place the deuterium water hydrogen test tube on other side. If they stay balanced, then AP is correct and Water is really H4O.
Cosmic Rays from Sun
90% of Sun's cosmic rays are 840MeV proton+muon inside = H. The hydrogen Atom is H2 where one of the H proton+muon converts to being a neutron.
When these proton+muon hit Earth atmosphere, they can turn into pions and muons.
I commented that H alone is a subatomic particle and that makes sense in the idea that Sun's cosmic rays are 90% these proton+muon.
Now is interstellar hydrogen H2 and intergalactic hydrogen H2 formed when one H cosmic ray joins up with another H cosmic ray to form H2 atom?
Is this how we get H2 in outer space? From the splitting apart of H2 into H cosmic rays?
So how much of the Sun's hydrogen is H2 and how much is H ready to join with another H and reform back into H2. Probably little of the Sun's H is H alone, and the vast majority of the Sun's hydrogen is H2.
How much deuterium in the Sun? And it is a higher percentage than the deuterium in water on Earth?
Water is the only known non-metallic substance that expands when if freezes; its density decreases and it expands approximately 9% by volume. (Source: web Lunar and Planetary Institute)
I have to wait for experimental chemists and physicists to weigh the mass of test tubes from electrolysis, as to the verdict-- water is H4O.
But until that news comes in, I will look for other means of proof.
So AP says that the H2 is not a molecule but is the hydrogen Atom itself, where one proton+muon converts to a neutron and capacitates the other proton+muon which undergo the Faraday law.
There are subatomic particles of H in the form of Cosmic Rays from the Sun, but most of the Sun's hydrogen is H2, and flips back and forth from H to rejoining to form H2. Some gets away from the Sun and is cosmic rays.
But H2 is an Atom and H is a fleeting subatomic particle.
So can I prove Water is H4O from the data of Spectral lines of H2 is the same as deuterium, only slight difference is that the deuterium is a full fledged neutron not a makeshift proton+muon of H.
I suspect that special trait of water freezing is a proof that Water is H4O. Because the 840MeV proton torus with muon inside doing the Faraday law acting as a makeshift neutron capacitor for the other 840MeV proton torus with muon inside, is
mindless H+ as being hydrogen Atom of H2.A neutron is a parallel plate capacitor and those plates can expand when frozen temperature occurs. As the temperature gets colder, those plates move further apart.
Now does deuterium which truly has a full neutron, does it expand also when frozen?? If so, does it expand as much as H2 which is 2 protons with 2 muons inside?
So comparing the freezing and expansion of the parallel plates of a neutron in deuterium with the freezing and expansion of one of the proton+muon that is acting as a makeshift neutron in H2.
If I can numbers correlate the H2 expansion with the Deuterium expansion would be a alternative proof that Water is really H4O and not H2O.
AP
to
So now on Blankenship's book "Molecular Mechanisms of Photosynthesis", 2014, page 134, shows The structure of ATP, ADP, AMP. And within that structure are OH hydroxyls.
In New Chemistry, water is truly H4O, and where hydroxyls are now H2O. And we have first proof of this in the Figure 8.1 of Blankenship's "Chemical structure of ATP".
For in the lower left corner of the diagram, Blankenship has a H+ all alone, (really a mindless error) and has P surrounded by O-, O-, O and OH. The OH is really H2O for hydroxyls are H2O and water itself is H4O, and that would leave that
realize that there is no HC, no H2C, no H3C, but starts with H4C, and that tells me water starts with H4O. Totally confident that Old Chemistry, Old Physics did electrolysis experiments and the moment they saw hydrogen test tube be 2x volume of oxygenThe world of physics and chemistry should drop what they are doing and weigh the electrolysis test tube of hydrogen and oxygen to discover the correct true formula of water is H4O.
AP is total confident, becuase an Atom cannot exist if it has no capacitor structure such as a neutron, or one of the H in H2 acting as a neutron. I am totally confident that Water formula is truly H4O. And I need look only to methane of H4C, to
When water electrolysis is physics weighed, AP is confident that there are 4H per every one oxygen O. And that Water is truly H4O.
electrolysis of water.On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 8:56:57 AM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
Now I see some of these electronic weighing scales are accurate to 0.00001 gram. I do not know if that is within the accuracy I need for weighing a test tube of oxygen then a test tube of hydrogen from water electrolysis.
Now modern day physics and chemist experimenters can really do a marvelous job if they wanted to. For they could freeze the test tubes of oxygen and hydrogen to where they are liquid and compare liquids from water electrolysis.
So, what AP is saying here is that we do electrolysis of water. We collect the two test tubes, one with oxygen the other with hydrogen.
To prove Water is truly the formula H4O and not H2O we must weigh the masses of the two tubes to find that the ratio is 1 x 16amu to 4 x 1amu.
The silly grotesque science error of the past was to look at volumes in the two test tubes-- "Hey-- the hydrogen is twice the volume of oxygen so the formula of water is H2O".
No, way was that science good practice. For the correct formula of water needs to be measured by mass, by atomic mass units where Oxygen is 16amu and hydrogen is 1amu.
I suspect a balance beam scale is good enough to see the hydrogen test tube will be 1/4 as massive as the oxygen test tube. To get within precision of electronic weighing scale of 0.00001 gram we just have to make a larger test tube of
properties of solid methane is discussed near 20.48K and...AP is betting that the readings will be hydrogen test tube 1/4 the mass of oxygen test tube proving Water formula is truly H4O.
Old Physics and Old Chemistry is betting that the mass experiment will have the hydrogen test tube be 1/8 the mass of the oxygen test tube, proving Water formula is H2O.
AP does not have these precision equipment to conduct an at-home experiment of this nature.
So, once Water is found to actually be H4O, not H2O, we move on to methane, and ask the same question of its hydrogen bonds. Is Methane really that of H8C and not H4C.
Well, looking in the literature for anomalies to methane, I come across a arXiv "Low and high-temperature anomalies in the physical properties of solid methane "The anomalous behavior of thermodynamic, spectral, plastic, elastic and some other
AP wonders: if they can get methane to solid form, well, I am then hopeful that the mass of the molecule can be determined. Because if methane is truly H8C, that difference of H4 in atomic mass units would be very much noticeable difference.
Chemistry Europe--
"The Anomalous Deuterium Isotope Effect in the NMR Spectrum of Methane...
P Vermeeren, 2023
"The abnormally long and weak methylidyne C-H bond.."
"The C-H bond of the methylidyne radical, CH*, is abnormally long and weak, even longer and..."
AP asks, are these anomalies solved if we consider methane is actually H8C and not H4C?
AP
My 250th published book.with date-time markers, and fact telling. And there are no problem sets. This book is intended for 1st year college. Until I include problem sets and exercises, I leave it to the professor and instructor to provide such. And also, chemistry is hugely a
TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY; H2 is the hydrogen Atom and water is H4O, not H2O// Chemistry
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle)
Prologue: This textbook is 1/2 research history and 1/2 factual textbook combined as one textbook. For many of the experiments described here-in have not yet been performed, such as water is really H4O not H2O. Written in a style of history research
Preface: This is my 250th book of science, and the first of my textbooks on Teaching True Chemistry. I have completed the Teaching True Physics and the Teaching True Mathematics textbook series. But had not yet started on a Teaching True Chemistrytextbook series. What got me started on this project is the fact that no chemistry textbook had the correct formula for water which is actually H4O and not H2O. Leaving the true formula for hydroxyl groups as H2O and not OH. But none of this is possible
Cover Picture: Sorry for the crude sketch work but chemistry and physics students are going to have to learn to make such sketches in a minute or less. Just as they make Lewis diagrams or ball & stick diagrams. My 4-5 minute sketch-work of the Watermolecule H4O plus the subatomic particle H, and the hydrogen atom H2. Showing how one H is a proton torus with muon inside (blue color) doing the Faraday law. Protons are toruses with many windings. Protons are the coils in Faraday law while muons are
Product details
• ASIN : B0CCLPTBDG
• Publication date : July 21, 2023
• Language : English
• File size : 788 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Sticky notes : On Kindle Scribe
• Print length : 168 pages
y z
| /
| /
|/______ x
On Thursday, November 9, 2023 at 1:05:40 AM UTC-5, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
On Thursday, 9 November 2023 at 07:39:13 UTC+11, edpr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday, November 5, 2023 at 12:58:35 PM UTC-5, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=7558701444157587&set=pcb.7558707940823604
If you go through my earlier posts, you will find the video for each of the graphs.The underlying data for the violation of inertia graphs (1 to 6) that I have been presenting recently are shown here.I'm not redong the experiment.
I would very much like all interested parties to re-do the experiments I have shown.
[]
At least, the data that I have presented needs to be checked.Yes, I'll do that.
The consequences of my experiements are profound.We'll see.
The two second video film contains all the informaation.[]
therre is no video on your FB link, just photos.
In my earlier posts here, the link to the graphs and videos were present. The two second video film has been split into 30-40ms sections.
Your experimental method is unclear. I have some questions:
For every frame, the position of the armature with respect to the scale is noted - somewhat roughly I am afraid.Is the scale the yellow level? Why didn't you use a meter stick or tape measure???
It is a meter stick that is used, with red tape marking 10cm distances. .
Is the armature the metal bar?
It is a heavy *cylinder* which rolls on the rails.
(By bar I understand a squarish sort of object).
Yes, ultimately we need bars instead of cylinders for much higher efficiency, but that is another story. Plenty of complications there relating to contact resistances and welding need to be sorted out. At present, beyond my scope.
Then the position of the gun is also noted, from the pointer and the scale.Is the gun the wooden platform?
It is the big wooden thing that moves backwards, then forwards on the rollers.
Knowing the masses of the armature and the gun,But you did not report the values of the masses, so those values cannot be verified in your data.
the position of the centre of mass for the whole system is calculated.
What are the masses
They were mentioned in the information mentioned earlier in this series. Anyway:
The mass of the armature is 2980 gm.
The mass of the gun is 8720gm.
The below is the raw data. For the graphs the values have been initialised from zero,Where are the graphs? They are not on FB.
You have to go to my facebook timeline. They are all there.
I will make a new post with all the links to the graphs, and post it here.
that is, the first value of time is set to zero, and from the rest of the time values, subtracted.How do you justify 10 digits in the center of mass values?
Same process is done for the other columns. Thus the position values for the armature, gun
and the centre of mass are obtained with respect to time.
Excel is used to get the values of the centre of mass values with respect to time, and generates 10 digits from the values given.
The graphs evidently do not need the 10 digit values.
The center of mass is changing, so I think you left something out of the data.
The position and the velocity of the armature and gun are changing with time, yes, and that comes from the raw data.
The centre of mass is calculated from their positions and masses.
(It seems that you do not include the motion of the rollers under the gun?)
The rollers are there to reduce friction between the gun and the ground. They are not part of the gun. They are light but hard plastic tubes used in plumbing.
Ideally this experiment should be performed in outer space where there is no friction, and where the gun-motor will be used in the future.
But as we are on Earth, we have to do what it takes to minimise the friction. The rollers help in that.
The velocity values are obtained knowing the time, the position and the state of the gunAnd why do the values for positions of Armature and gun have more digits near the end of the dataset?
following the notes relating to how long the armature was on the rails, when it hit the arrestors, etc.
Don't see any lack of consistency in the dataset.
What UNITS for each column?
milliseconds for the first column.
cm for the others.
That should have been obvious from the snapshots.
are the Time values in units of frame number??? or milliseconds? or something else?
Milliseconds.
are the position values in inches? cm? or something else?
cm
Time armature gun centre of mass notes[]
4800 67 80 72.96239316
4870 66 80 72.70769231
4900 65 80 72.45299145
4930 64 81 72.94358974 spark on rail
4970 63 81 72.68888889
5000 62 81.5 72.80683761
7170 -6.25 79.75 54.11923077There's not enough information to work this out.
7200 -6.5 79.5 53.86923077
7230 -6.75 79.25 53.61923077
7270 -6.9 79.1 53.46923077
7300 -7 79 53.36923077
Towards the end, the armature has gone off beyond the scale, but not to worry, from the pointer to the scale we can work out how much it has exceeded the range, so the negative sign for the position.
Hope my answers helped.
Basically I put up the snaps and the data to make people see the validity of the data from the experiment which in turn would lead to understanding the graphs posted eariier in my facebook timeline.
I will put in all the links in one post and publish that here, to make things easier.
Ed
Thanks for your interest.I will look at this a little more. This is how science is supposed to work.
***
What needs to be understood is that the centre of mass moves violating inertia and consequently revising the basics of physics.
***
Once that is clear, the road to making new motors for faster than light travel will be clear.
Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee
But I have a new work assignment beginning next week, so I cannot spend
much time on this. Going back and forth like this is not very efficient.
I have a suggestion for you: write up your experiment in a proper lab report format that includes all the information about the lab equipment (measurement
devices, power supplies, materials), the procedure for running the experiment
(how to set up for the test, how to start and run the device, etc.), and the results
(nice that you include the raw data like the video). You might have to include
the video separately, but everything else could be in a document (PDF).
Doing that is much better for someone to review your results or, as you also requested, to try to reproduce the results. I still do not have the time or work
area to reproduce this experiment.
It is nice to have a productive discussion like this. Lets keep it up and be a good example for others.
Talk to you later,
Ed
Perpetual motion is the rule as inertia will go on forever by definition
for most movements.
Perpetual motion is the rule as inertia will go on forever by definitionAs I show, there are exceptions in certain engineeriing situations showing that the law of conservation of energy is a special case.
for most movements.
On Sunday, November 12, 2023 at 11:47:08 AM UTC-8, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
Perpetual motion is the rule as inertia will go on forever by definition
for most movements.
Escape velocity can end atomic momentum leaving gravitation.
That is perpetual motion going down in time.
Friction can end rotation and rolling motions.
Astronomical has no evidence for stillness...
Perpetual motion is the rule as inertia will go on forever by definition
for most movements.
Perpetual motion is the rule as inertia will go on forever by definition
for most movements.
On Saturday, 11 November 2023 at 02:54:00 UTC+11, edpr...@gmail.com wrote:[]
I will look at this a little more. This is how science is supposed to work.
But I have a new work assignment beginning next week, so I cannot spend much time on this. Going back and forth like this is not very efficient.
I have a suggestion for you: write up your experiment in a proper lab report
format that includes all the information about the lab equipment (measurement
devices, power supplies, materials), the procedure for running the experiment
(how to set up for the test, how to start and run the device, etc.), and the results
(nice that you include the raw data like the video). You might have to include
the video separately, but everything else could be in a document (PDF).
Quite, a good idea if I was funded to do that adequately by renowned establishments
who would also welcome me to give lectures, give me assistants, lots of publicity, etc. :-) :-)
As things are, I am satisfied with what I have done, and now I have other pressing matters to attend to.
I am confident that any competent technician can reproduce what I have done, from all the information available on the 2-sec video.
A team of technicians could do that in a matter of hours.
I have no doubt, they can improve upon what I have done, if they place the rollers on a
large flat block of ice, for instance. Or use skis. In which case I would expect the reaction
to be even more pronounced, but the gun would keep on moving longer if slower.
Then they could experiement with making the gun heavier, using longer rails, greater charges...
Whatever they do, they will find more action than reaction, with sufficient current and mobility.
I would urge them to try out sliding the heavy armature, for greater efficiency and somehow
negating welding with far better contact surfaces. That is beyond my scope, for now.
The field is open to all those interested. I have been working on this from 2015, had a great time.
Cheers, see if you can get some worthy billionaire of pacific character interested to
make faster than light motors following this design - with myself at the helm that won't take long.
Prior to that, huge publicity in the global media is a must to revise physics following this discovery.
Burning all the toxic e=mcc=hv and entropy crap will make such a flame that will make that at Nalanda Uni look like a campfire.
All rights reserved by
Arindam Banerjee
Director
HTN Research Pty Ltd, Melbourne
On Friday, November 10, 2023 at 5:20:18 PM UTC-5, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
On Saturday, 11 November 2023 at 02:54:00 UTC+11, edpr...@gmail.com wrote:[]
I will look at this a little more. This is how science is supposed to work.
But I have a new work assignment beginning next week, so I cannot spend much time on this. Going back and forth like this is not very efficient.
I have a suggestion for you: write up your experiment in a proper lab report
format that includes all the information about the lab equipment (measurement
devices, power supplies, materials), the procedure for running the experiment
(how to set up for the test, how to start and run the device, etc.), and the results
(nice that you include the raw data like the video). You might have to include
the video separately, but everything else could be in a document (PDF).
Quite, a good idea if I was funded to do that adequately by renowned establishments
who would also welcome me to give lectures, give me assistants, lots of publicity, etc. :-) :-)
As things are, I am satisfied with what I have done, and now I have other pressing matters to attend to.
I am confident that any competent technician can reproduce what I have done,I assure you that I am more than competent to analyze this experiment, but not from
from all the information available on the 2-sec video.
A team of technicians could do that in a matter of hours.
poorly arranged and scattered lab notes and data.
You should be able to write up the
suggested report in less time than you spend posting here complaining about how
the science community is persecuting you.
If you don't want to do a little more work on your own experiment than I can't help you.
I have no doubt, they can improve upon what I have done, if they place the rollers on aBut why would they bother without a convincing presentation?
large flat block of ice, for instance. Or use skis. In which case I would expect the reaction
to be even more pronounced, but the gun would keep on moving longer if slower.
Then they could experiement with making the gun heavier, using longer rails, greater charges...
Whatever they do, they will find more action than reaction, with sufficient current and mobility.
What final step? All the information is there online. Anyone who wants, can at least go through my data if they do not want to repeat the experiment.I would urge them to try out sliding the heavy armature, for greater efficiency and somehowEight years and you abandon the final step? What a waste of time!
negating welding with far better contact surfaces. That is beyond my scope, for now.
The field is open to all those interested. I have been working on this from 2015, had a great time.
[]
Cheers, see if you can get some worthy billionaire of pacific character interested to
make faster than light motors following this design - with myself at the helm that won't take long.
Prior to that, huge publicity in the global media is a must to revise physics following this discovery.
Burning all the toxic e=mcc=hv and entropy crap will make such a flame that will make that at Nalanda Uni look like a campfire.
All rights reserved byNot going to happen without a decent presentation of proof. Poor quality information scattered in multiple places on the network is not a decent presentation.
Arindam Banerjee
Director
HTN Research Pty Ltd, Melbourne
If you can't help yourself, neither can I.No, you cannot say whether the data in the graphs follows from the experimental snaps of the 2-s video.
Enjoy your other projects. This one seems dead.You wish.
Ed
I assure you that I am more than competent to analyze this experiment,
On Sunday, November 12, 2023 at 5:16:40 PM UTC-8, edpr...@gmail.com wrote:
I assure you that I am more than competent to analyze this experiment,
Any kid that passes a high school physics class is "more than competent" to analyze this crap.
It's not like it isn't obvious that Arindham is just delusional.
James McGinn / Genius
James McGinn <jimmc...@gmail.com> wrote:Any more Dunning-Kluger snipers around?
On Sunday, November 12, 2023 at 5:16:40 PM UTC-8, edpr...@gmail.com wrote:
I assure you that I am more than competent to analyze this experiment,
Any kid that passes a high school physics class is "more than competent" to analyze this crap.
It's not like it isn't obvious that Arindham is just delusional.
James McGinn / GeniusIt is amusing that a delusionally insane crackpot can recognize another delusionally insane crackpot but be totally oblivious to his own
delusions.
On Sunday, November 12, 2023 at 5:16:40 PM UTC-8, edpr...@gmail.com wrote:But it is not crap. It is as significant as fire and wheel and electricity.
I assure you that I am more than competent to analyze this experiment,Any kid that passes a high school physics class is "more than competent" to analyze this crap.
It's not like it isn't obvious that Arindham is just delusional.Nothing delusional about my 2 sec video film.
James McGinn / GeniusNo you are an asshole.
Inertia exists because there is no absolute rest.
Perpetual motion astronomical is the rule...
On Sunday, November 12, 2023 at 5:16:40 PM UTC-8, edpr...@gmail.com wrote:[]
I assure you that I am more than competent to analyze this experiment,Any kid that passes a high school physics class is "more than competent" to analyze this crap.
James McGinn / Genius
On Thursday, 9 November 2023 at 07:39:13 UTC+11, edpr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday, November 5, 2023 at 12:58:35 PM UTC-5, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=7558701444157587&set=pcb.7558707940823604
If you go through my earlier posts, you will find the video for each of the graphs.The underlying data for the violation of inertia graphs (1 to 6) that I have been presenting recently are shown here.I'm not redong the experiment.
I would very much like all interested parties to re-do the experiments I have shown.
[]
At least, the data that I have presented needs to be checked.Yes, I'll do that.
The consequences of my experiements are profound.We'll see.
The two second video film contains all the informaation.[]
therre is no video on your FB link, just photos.
In my earlier posts here, the link to the graphs and videos were present. The two second video film has been split into 30-40ms sections.
Your experimental method is unclear. I have some questions:
For every frame, the position of the armature with respect to the scale is noted - somewhat roughly I am afraid.Is the scale the yellow level? Why didn't you use a meter stick or tape measure???
It is a meter stick that is used, with red tape marking 10cm distances. .
Is the armature the metal bar?
It is a heavy *cylinder* which rolls on the rails.
(By bar I understand a squarish sort of object).
Yes, ultimately we need bars instead of cylinders for much higher efficiency, but that is another story. Plenty of complications there relating to contact resistances and welding need to be sorted out. At present, beyond my scope.
Then the position of the gun is also noted, from the pointer and the scale.Is the gun the wooden platform?
It is the big wooden thing that moves backwards, then forwards on the rollers.
Knowing the masses of the armature and the gun,But you did not report the values of the masses, so those values cannot be verified in your data.
the position of the centre of mass for the whole system is calculated.
What are the masses
They were mentioned in the information mentioned earlier in this series. Anyway:
The mass of the armature is 2980 gm.
The mass of the gun is 8720gm.
The below is the raw data. For the graphs the values have been initialised from zero,Where are the graphs? They are not on FB.
You have to go to my facebook timeline. They are all there.
I will make a new post with all the links to the graphs, and post it here.
that is, the first value of time is set to zero, and from the rest of the time values, subtracted.How do you justify 10 digits in the center of mass values?
Same process is done for the other columns. Thus the position values for the armature, gun
and the centre of mass are obtained with respect to time.
Excel is used to get the values of the centre of mass values with respect to time, and generates 10 digits from the values given.
The graphs evidently do not need the 10 digit values.
The center of mass is changing, so I think you left something out of the data.
The position and the velocity of the armature and gun are changing with time, yes, and that comes from the raw data.
The centre of mass is calculated from their positions and masses.
(It seems that you do not include the motion of the rollers under the gun?)
The rollers are there to reduce friction between the gun and the ground. They are not part of the gun. They are light but hard plastic tubes used in plumbing.
Ideally this experiment should be performed in outer space where there is no friction, and where the gun-motor will be used in the future.
But as we are on Earth, we have to do what it takes to minimise the friction. The rollers help in that.
The velocity values are obtained knowing the time, the position and the state of the gunAnd why do the values for positions of Armature and gun have more digits near the end of the dataset?
following the notes relating to how long the armature was on the rails, when it hit the arrestors, etc.
Don't see any lack of consistency in the dataset.
What UNITS for each column?
milliseconds for the first column.
cm for the others.
That should have been obvious from the snapshots.
are the Time values in units of frame number??? or milliseconds? or something else?
Milliseconds.
are the position values in inches? cm? or something else?
cm
Time armature gun centre of mass notes[]
4800 67 80 72.96239316
4870 66 80 72.70769231
4900 65 80 72.45299145
4930 64 81 72.94358974 spark on rail
4970 63 81 72.68888889
5000 62 81.5 72.80683761
7170 -6.25 79.75 54.11923077There's not enough information to work this out.
7200 -6.5 79.5 53.86923077
7230 -6.75 79.25 53.61923077
7270 -6.9 79.1 53.46923077
7300 -7 79 53.36923077
Towards the end, the armature has gone off beyond the scale, but not to worry, from the pointer to the scale we can work out how much it has exceeded the range, so the negative sign for the position.
Hope my answers helped.
Basically I put up the snaps and the data to make people see the validity of the data from the experiment which in turn would lead to understanding the graphs posted eariier in my facebook timeline.
I will put in all the links in one post and publish that here, to make things easier.
Ed
Thanks for your interest.
***
What needs to be understood is that the centre of mass moves violating inertia and consequently revising the basics of physics.
***
Once that is clear, the road to making new motors for faster than light travel will be clear.
Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee
would sell them to them too.Muslims are far closer to India than jews.Jews are the descendants of the guj_Jews who migrated out over 5000 years ago, after the battle of the Kurukshetra, as per my pet theory (call it conjecture if "theory" sounds too grand).
They were thus sort-of Gujarati Hindus formerly, and as a matrilineal caste, retain that common social trait of caste, now reversed from patrilineal.
Jews have a racist, exploitative transactional relationship with India.That may be true. I saw a youtube video about Indian Jews who had migrated to Israel. They were treated very badly as compared to the white European Jews, so started lamenting their nice fat jobs in India they had left to live in tents.
India lavishes money on Jew "wonder-weapons" that don't work (India's "revenge attack" on Balakot with jew bombs was an utter failure and indians don't talk about it any more)) and jews sell the same weapons to China and if pakistan had the money,
Christians and the good ones will ascend to heaven - and I think jews will get burnt in hellfire along with bad Christians. The Jews are cool with it - since the rednecks terrorize the Republican party into unlimited support for Isrrael IN THE HERE ANDSo long as they have US support - and why not, they own the US and much more from those who want to live forever with their one true God in Heaven for all time to come - they can do whatever they want. Such is the power of their theological IP."theological IP" - now things likeTHAT are what makes you Mahashay !!!!!!!!!!!!!
Jew hating Christian rednecks in the US are RABID supporters of Israel because the jews have convinced them that the rapture will happen only when all the jews are gathered in Israel. The Christian big-guy in the sky would then open the graves of dead
On Monday, 13 November 2023 at 12:16:40 UTC+11, edpr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Friday, November 10, 2023 at 5:20:18 PM UTC-5, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
On Saturday, 11 November 2023 at 02:54:00 UTC+11, edpr...@gmail.com wrote:[]
I will look at this a little more. This is how science is supposed to work.
generations.But I have a new work assignment beginning next week, so I cannot spend
much time on this. Going back and forth like this is not very efficient.
I have a suggestion for you: write up your experiment in a proper lab report
format that includes all the information about the lab equipment (measurement
devices, power supplies, materials), the procedure for running the experiment
(how to set up for the test, how to start and run the device, etc.), and the results
(nice that you include the raw data like the video). You might have to include
the video separately, but everything else could be in a document (PDF).
Quite, a good idea if I was funded to do that adequately by renowned establishments
who would also welcome me to give lectures, give me assistants, lots of publicity, etc. :-) :-)
As things are, I am satisfied with what I have done, and now I have other pressing matters to attend to.
My data and notes should be perfectly clear to those with a minimum honesty and intelligence.I am confident that any competent technician can reproduce what I have done,I assure you that I am more than competent to analyze this experiment, but not from
from all the information available on the 2-sec video.
A team of technicians could do that in a matter of hours.
poorly arranged and scattered lab notes and data.
I had answered your SCIENTIFIC queries earlier, in detail.
You have not made a single point to question my claim about the violation of inertia with my new design rail gun.
That is enough for me!
You should be able to write up theYou have no business to tell me what I should do.
suggested report in less time than you spend posting here complaining about how
the science community is persecuting you.
The reports are already there, presented here in this ng and to my engineering colleagues, and have been submitted to the Hon PM of Australia.
Text of my submission to the PM below:
****
I would respectfully like to bring to your kind attention our new discovery in physics that has enormous implications for advanced future technology. This discovery is as significant for the human race as the wheel, fire, electricity, etc.
The discovery is that the principle of inertia can be violated under certain engineering conditions. Many technical innovations and new commercial approaches are now possible from this discovery that will lead to vastly better futures for the coming
My invention of a new design electromagnetic rail gun has made this discovery possible. A working model of that gun, in motor mode, showing overall lack of recoil is shown in the link below. It shows the power stroke of a two-stroke engine that willgive a body a certain increase in velocity after every “hit”.
https://www.facebook.com/100000534193755/videos/pcb.7556513371043061/1006108110439305will not be possible for the academic world to grasp it as some of their dearest convictions will have to be overthrown. Their instinctive reaction is rejection. Such attitude makes journal publication impossible. Only urgent political pressure may
Details about the above video may be obtained from the link below: https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics/c/VtFeGAkIABg/m/CLPzLRElAwAJ
My humble request to you, sir, is that you forward this link to your concerned Government departments dealing with new and innovative scientific research. My problem – learnt from bitter experience - is that as this discovery is so revolutionary, it
So my fond hope is, sir, that as a result of your direct personal initiative, I be asked to give talks to a suitably empowered audience, who will review on a fair and unbiased basis my solo unsupported work in this field over the last 25 years. I haveno doubt that such an initiative will send the ball rolling for many new inventions in the areas of green energy and superfast safe green transport with a new class of reactionless electric motors.
Finally I would like you to know that this is a purely Australian invention and discovery. I rely upon my fine Aussie mates to help make the best use of it, for the good of Australia. In this context I would like to inform that the one-person companythat I founded in 2010, mentioned below, does novel research into the fundamental issues relating to energy and motion, to acquire Intellectual Property for commercialisation. There are no liabilities for this company, which ideally should serve as an
Expecting a favourable and constructive reply from your side and with deep regards,
*****
I have asked him to contact fair, honest and competent people to go through my 2 sec video, the graphs and the explanations, all online
Hopefully I will get a reply, but if not, I will contact other important people who should be interested.
If you don't want to do a little more work on your own experiment than I can't help you.Then do not. Nobody asked YOU, sir. My work in this field, which in this case is presenting a new discovery as significant as fire, the wheel, electricity, etc. is for posterity to utilise.
Worked 25 years on this! Those who care to know, know all about it. Why they do not support me openly is the question, and I think I know the answer. So I understand.
Lazy and foolish people, careerists, bigots, vested interests, racists, political types etc. will ignore and obstruct, naturally.
And there are so many of them!
But life finds ways to overcome such resistances. I may not live to see the fruition of my new physics, if the opposition is too great.
So what, I will live up to the values of my scientific peers, none of them alive now, I am afraid. Work selflessly for the glory of Science, and the good of all that is animal, vegetable and mineral. Open new vistas. Tear down cages. Free the spirit!
My presentation is convincing to anyone honest and intelligent.I have no doubt, they can improve upon what I have done, if they place the rollers on aBut why would they bother without a convincing presentation?
large flat block of ice, for instance. Or use skis. In which case I would expect the reaction
to be even more pronounced, but the gun would keep on moving longer if slower.
Then they could experiement with making the gun heavier, using longer rails, greater charges...
Whatever they do, they will find more action than reaction, with sufficient current and mobility.
******
The 2-s video and the graphs show violation of inertia, the key point. ******
Observers are welcome to point out where they cannot understand what I have presented.
That they have not, for the last 6 years (2017 videos were very detailed) means that I have got global acceptance, now mere politics hinders progress.
What final step? All the information is there online. Anyone who wants, can at least go through my data if they do not want to repeat the experiment.I would urge them to try out sliding the heavy armature, for greater efficiency and somehowEight years and you abandon the final step? What a waste of time!
negating welding with far better contact surfaces. That is beyond my scope, for now.
The field is open to all those interested. I have been working on this from 2015, had a great time.
Certainly I have not wasted my time. It took me 25 years to get to where I want, that is, write to the Australian PM about this new discovery.
Now it is up to the proper authorities to take it up or ignore it for as long as they can.
[]
Cheers, see if you can get some worthy billionaire of pacific character interested to
make faster than light motors following this design - with myself at the helm that won't take long.
Prior to that, huge publicity in the global media is a must to revise physics following this discovery.
Burning all the toxic e=mcc=hv and entropy crap will make such a flame that will make that at Nalanda Uni look like a campfire.
It is a very decent presentation to all the world.All rights reserved byNot going to happen without a decent presentation of proof. Poor quality information scattered in multiple places on the network is not a decent presentation.
Arindam Banerjee
Director
HTN Research Pty Ltd, Melbourne
Also, absolutely novel in that it gives me copyright, is available to all totally free with no strings, cannot be corrupted, cannot be hijacked, cannot be suppresed....
Done cheaply! No wasting money on feeding parasites, just appeal to the vast endless public for all time. Depend upon democracy! Not learned professors and their pet journals.
It shows the power of truth, absolute truth!
What a triumph for truth!
And how???
It makes use of online media, freely available to all.
People can access it by the millions and billions, in due course.
And understand my point, that is, violation of inertia, and its extraordinary consequences.
The 2-s video shows it all.
Hurrah for Facebook, Youtube, Google Groups, Usenet, Instagram...
If you can't help yourself, neither can I.No, you cannot say whether the data in the graphs follows from the experimental snaps of the 2-s video.
Too lazy to show whether or not I have got the correct data from the experiment, what.
Enjoy your other projects. This one seems dead.You wish.
Quod videosi, videosi. https://www.facebook.com/100000534193755/videos/pcb.7556513371043061/1006108110439305
Ed
On Thursday, 9 November 2023 at 17:05:40 UTC+11, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
On Thursday, 9 November 2023 at 07:39:13 UTC+11, edpr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday, November 5, 2023 at 12:58:35 PM UTC-5, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=7558701444157587&set=pcb.7558707940823604
If you go through my earlier posts, you will find the video for each of the graphs.The underlying data for the violation of inertia graphs (1 to 6) that I have been presenting recently are shown here.I'm not redong the experiment.
I would very much like all interested parties to re-do the experiments I have shown.
[]
At least, the data that I have presented needs to be checked.Yes, I'll do that.
The consequences of my experiements are profound.We'll see.
The two second video film contains all the informaation.[]
therre is no video on your FB link, just photos.
In my earlier posts here, the link to the graphs and videos were present. The two second video film has been split into 30-40ms sections.
Your experimental method is unclear. I have some questions:
For every frame, the position of the armature with respect to the scale is noted - somewhat roughly I am afraid.Is the scale the yellow level? Why didn't you use a meter stick or tape measure???
It is a meter stick that is used, with red tape marking 10cm distances. .
Is the armature the metal bar?
It is a heavy *cylinder* which rolls on the rails.
(By bar I understand a squarish sort of object).
Yes, ultimately we need bars instead of cylinders for much higher efficiency, but that is another story. Plenty of complications there relating to contact resistances and welding need to be sorted out. At present, beyond my scope.
Then the position of the gun is also noted, from the pointer and the scale.Is the gun the wooden platform?
It is the big wooden thing that moves backwards, then forwards on the rollers.
Knowing the masses of the armature and the gun,But you did not report the values of the masses, so those values cannot be verified in your data.
the position of the centre of mass for the whole system is calculated.
What are the masses
They were mentioned in the information mentioned earlier in this series. Anyway:
The mass of the armature is 2980 gm.
The mass of the gun is 8720gm.
The below is the raw data. For the graphs the values have been initialised from zero,Where are the graphs? They are not on FB.
You have to go to my facebook timeline. They are all there.
I will make a new post with all the links to the graphs, and post it here.
that is, the first value of time is set to zero, and from the rest of the time values, subtracted.How do you justify 10 digits in the center of mass values?
Same process is done for the other columns. Thus the position values for the armature, gun
and the centre of mass are obtained with respect to time.
Excel is used to get the values of the centre of mass values with respect to time, and generates 10 digits from the values given.
The graphs evidently do not need the 10 digit values.
The center of mass is changing, so I think you left something out of the data.
The position and the velocity of the armature and gun are changing with time, yes, and that comes from the raw data.
The centre of mass is calculated from their positions and masses.
(It seems that you do not include the motion of the rollers under the gun?)
The rollers are there to reduce friction between the gun and the ground. They are not part of the gun. They are light but hard plastic tubes used in plumbing.
Ideally this experiment should be performed in outer space where there is no friction, and where the gun-motor will be used in the future.
But as we are on Earth, we have to do what it takes to minimise the friction. The rollers help in that.
The velocity values are obtained knowing the time, the position and the state of the gunAnd why do the values for positions of Armature and gun have more digits near the end of the dataset?
following the notes relating to how long the armature was on the rails, when it hit the arrestors, etc.
Don't see any lack of consistency in the dataset.
What UNITS for each column?
milliseconds for the first column.
cm for the others.
That should have been obvious from the snapshots.
are the Time values in units of frame number??? or milliseconds? or something else?
Milliseconds.
would sell them to them too.are the position values in inches? cm? or something else?
cm
Time armature gun centre of mass notes[]
4800 67 80 72.96239316
4870 66 80 72.70769231
4900 65 80 72.45299145
4930 64 81 72.94358974 spark on rail
4970 63 81 72.68888889
5000 62 81.5 72.80683761
7170 -6.25 79.75 54.11923077There's not enough information to work this out.
7200 -6.5 79.5 53.86923077
7230 -6.75 79.25 53.61923077
7270 -6.9 79.1 53.46923077
7300 -7 79 53.36923077
Towards the end, the armature has gone off beyond the scale, but not to worry, from the pointer to the scale we can work out how much it has exceeded the range, so the negative sign for the position.
Hope my answers helped.
Basically I put up the snaps and the data to make people see the validity of the data from the experiment which in turn would lead to understanding the graphs posted eariier in my facebook timeline.
I will put in all the links in one post and publish that here, to make things easier.
Ed
Thanks for your interest.The small-mindedness shown here by the scp netters is astounding, but I am no longer surprised.
***
What needs to be understood is that the centre of mass moves violating inertia and consequently revising the basics of physics.
***
Once that is clear, the road to making new motors for faster than light travel will be clear.
Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee
They would rather believe in nonsense theories, than face facts.
How is this possible, is the question.
I gave an explanation in alt.usage.english recently.
Basically, superstition and racism on one hand, and unscrupulous cunning on the other.
*****
Muslims are far closer to India than jews.Jews are the descendants of the guj_Jews who migrated out over 5000 years ago, after the battle of the Kurukshetra, as per my pet theory (call it conjecture if "theory" sounds too grand).
They were thus sort-of Gujarati Hindus formerly, and as a matrilineal caste, retain that common social trait of caste, now reversed from patrilineal.
Jews have a racist, exploitative transactional relationship with India.That may be true. I saw a youtube video about Indian Jews who had migrated to Israel. They were treated very badly as compared to the white European Jews, so started lamenting their nice fat jobs in India they had left to live in tents.
India lavishes money on Jew "wonder-weapons" that don't work (India's "revenge attack" on Balakot with jew bombs was an utter failure and indians don't talk about it any more)) and jews sell the same weapons to China and if pakistan had the money,
dead Christians and the good ones will ascend to heaven - and I think jews will get burnt in hellfire along with bad Christians. The Jews are cool with it - since the rednecks terrorize the Republican party into unlimited support for Isrrael IN THE HERESo long as they have US support - and why not, they own the US and much more from those who want to live forever with their one true God in Heaven for all time to come - they can do whatever they want. Such is the power of their theological IP."theological IP" - now things likeTHAT are what makes you Mahashay !!!!!!!!!!!!!
Jew hating Christian rednecks in the US are RABID supporters of Israel because the jews have convinced them that the rapture will happen only when all the jews are gathered in Israel. The Christian big-guy in the sky would then open the graves of
What makes me wonder, is how these superstitious entities managed to create great technologies. Baffling.
On deeper thought, it is probable that the scale of their superstition is such, that the brightest minds among them get totally isolated and have to get focussed upon rational matters - as a relief.
It takes only a few to make the scientific and engineering advances.
After that, invisible hand takes over and profits multiply with blind repetition.
It takes stupid people who can mindlessly keep on doing the same money making thing ad infinitum to create a wealthy nation.
But then, the rich stupids think they are smart, as they are rich - and that infuriates and alienates the bright people even further, so they get even more rational and focussed about doing new great stuff.
A money-making cycle, not exactly virtuous though, for outlets like murder by war are often required.
Supreme brilliance for money-making by new technologies is facilitated thus by supreme dullness based upon rank superstitions.
******
A very good friend said it would take India CENTURIES to emerge from white worship after the Raj. It doesn't help that white worship is the very warp and weft of Hinduism.
The Brits joined the Indian system as super kshatriya-brahmins and convinced the upper classes that they were their long lost Aryan kinsmen and that the Raj was not a conquest, but a reunion of separated cousins. Don't tell me that Ram Lalla andKishan kanhaiya were black, just look at how Doordarshan portrays "rakshasas"
The Indian mind has been conceded by all potential competitors like slavs, Chinese et al as the 'software mind". And YET, Jews and the Jew-adjacent like Elon Musk are at the cutting edge of the "commanding heights" (to use a Nehruvian cliche) of AI,online finance etc. Musk wants to make Twitter your bank, your phone etc. - just imagine the colossal amounts of money involved. It cannot happen without the Indian software mind - but The Gora/Jew is ALWAYS in command.
India now has $500 billion in foreign exchange reserves = if we had a modern thinker in charge instead of Gujjus, India can set aside $50b and try to conquer the strategic underpinnings of global automation/ecommerce/social media. China has conqueredyoung America through Tiktok - surely India can compete in this area too. Yes it will displace millions of babus doing clerical work, but there are professions we haven't even dreamt of that will be opened up by AI.
▂▄▅█████████▅▄▃▂ I███████████████████]. ◥⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙◤...Radio Wave-- LASER RIFLE to shoot down the premier BeiDou satellite.
On Wednesday, 15 November 2023 at 14:13:42 UTC+11, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
his usual crap, and lies about me - what makes him such a small person?
On 11/14/2023 11:24 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
On Wednesday, 15 November 2023 at 14:13:42 UTC+11, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:Awww...are the twins having a kookfight again?
his usual crap, and lies about me - what makes him such a small person?
On Wednesday, 15 November 2023 at 16:08:27 UTC+11, Volney wrote:generations.
On 11/14/2023 11:24 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:Ah, Moroney, what took you so long to poke your nose in?
On Wednesday, 15 November 2023 at 14:13:42 UTC+11, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:Awww...are the twins having a kookfight again?
his usual crap, and lies about me - what makes him such a small person?
Are you a bigger racist+bigot than a worthy selfish-greedy devil?
I suspect the former, or else, even a moron like you would have pushed my work to the supremely selfish-greedy rich bosses for a cut.
Even a moron like you can forward to those the following text of my submission to the Australian PM.
Text of my submission to the PM below:
****
I would respectfully like to bring to your kind attention our new discovery in physics that has enormous implications for advanced future technology. This discovery is as significant for the human race as the wheel, fire, electricity, etc.
The discovery is that the principle of inertia can be violated under certain engineering conditions. Many technical innovations and new commercial approaches are now possible from this discovery that will lead to vastly better futures for the coming
My invention of a new design electromagnetic rail gun has made this discovery possible. A working model of that gun, in motor mode, showing overall lack of recoil is shown in the link below. It shows the power stroke of a two-stroke engine that willgive a body a certain increase in velocity after every “hit”.
https://www.facebook.com/100000534193755/videos/pcb.7556513371043061/1006108110439305will not be possible for the academic world to grasp it as some of their dearest convictions will have to be overthrown. Their instinctive reaction is rejection. Such attitude makes journal publication impossible. Only urgent political pressure may
Details about the above video may be obtained from the link below: https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics/c/VtFeGAkIABg/m/CLPzLRElAwAJ
My humble request to you, sir, is that you forward this link to your concerned Government departments dealing with new and innovative scientific research. My problem – learnt from bitter experience - is that as this discovery is so revolutionary, it
So my fond hope is, sir, that as a result of your direct personal initiative, I be asked to give talks to a suitably empowered audience, who will review on a fair and unbiased basis my solo unsupported work in this field over the last 25 years. I haveno doubt that such an initiative will send the ball rolling for many new inventions in the areas of green energy and superfast safe green transport with a new class of reactionless electric motors.
Finally I would like you to know that this is a purely Australian invention and discovery. I rely upon my fine Aussie mates to help make the best use of it, for the good of Australia. In this context I would like to inform that the one-person companythat I founded in 2010, mentioned below, does novel research into the fundamental issues relating to energy and motion, to acquire Intellectual Property for commercialisation. There are no liabilities for this company, which ideally should serve as an
Expecting a favourable and constructive reply from your side and with deep regards,
*****
"When devils run loose
Doing what they choose -
Why should liars not lie?
Why should thieves not steal?
Why should Archie not poo?
Why should Volney not squeal?"
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 300 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 109:57:13 |
| Calls: | 6,701 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 12,233 |
| Messages: | 5,348,547 |