In this chart we plot the velocity of the armature (the rolling brass cylinder of mass 2.98 Kg) with respect to time. Each small gridline is a 30millisecond or 40millisecond - typically there are two 30ms slots followed by a 40ms slot. Because we havetaken such small time slots, we can see the movement of the armature in an expanded way for better understanding. Like, watching a small object through a microscope to find new things.
What is evident is that there is nearly constant acceleration while the armature is on the rails, drawing current on the average about 4000 amps. This heavy current causes a large magnetic field at the edge of the rails and the armature, which with thecurrent through the armature causes the so-called Lorenz force accelerating it, from the formula F=BiL (B is the magnetic field strength, i the current and L the conductor length over which these two act). The formula suggests that there should be no
The armature reaches a peak speed of 2.88m/sec at the end of the rails. With its weight of 2.98Kg, that gives peak momentum of 8.58MKS units. The most powerful rifle bullet weighs 1.9gm and has a velocity of 1422m/s or has a momentum of 2.7 MKS units.So as a gun this has more than 3 times the momentum of the most powerful rifle bullet! Actually, had the recoil been blocked the exit velocity of the armature would have been 3.57m/s making it about 4 times more powerful! So I have actually made the most
The exit or impact velocity would have been about 3.57m/s as opposed to the present 2.88m/s had the armature been sliding instead of rolling, for then the treadmill action pushing the gun back would have been avoided. This sliding cannot happen withthis design, for with the same surfaces exposed, 4000Amps of current would cause welding - the armature could not move.
What of practical motors, then? The answer is that it would need technology beyond my scope. What is needed is very good contact between surfaces to make the contact resistance in the order of less than micro-ohms, like a continuous contact really.That would need excellent machining with very high tolerances, adequate surface coating, maybe a mercury lining, etc. Well beyond my scope, but not for that of any standard research organisation that is well funded.
https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=7542042632490135&set=pcb.7542144485813283The MKS units of measure for momentum do not have an official name. Call it a slug.
On Wednesday, November 1, 2023 at 5:58:03 AM UTC-4, Arindam Banerjee wrote:have taken such small time slots, we can see the movement of the armature in an expanded way for better understanding. Like, watching a small object through a microscope to find new things.
In this chart we plot the velocity of the armature (the rolling brass cylinder of mass 2.98 Kg) with respect to time. Each small gridline is a 30millisecond or 40millisecond - typically there are two 30ms slots followed by a 40ms slot. Because we
the current through the armature causes the so-called Lorenz force accelerating it, from the formula F=BiL (B is the magnetic field strength, i the current and L the conductor length over which these two act). The formula suggests that there should be noWhat is evident is that there is nearly constant acceleration while the armature is on the rails, drawing current on the average about 4000 amps. This heavy current causes a large magnetic field at the edge of the rails and the armature, which with
So as a gun this has more than 3 times the momentum of the most powerful rifle bullet! Actually, had the recoil been blocked the exit velocity of the armature would have been 3.57m/s making it about 4 times more powerful! So I have actually made theThe armature reaches a peak speed of 2.88m/sec at the end of the rails. With its weight of 2.98Kg, that gives peak momentum of 8.58MKS units. The most powerful rifle bullet weighs 1.9gm and has a velocity of 1422m/s or has a momentum of 2.7 MKS units.
this design, for with the same surfaces exposed, 4000Amps of current would cause welding - the armature could not move.The exit or impact velocity would have been about 3.57m/s as opposed to the present 2.88m/s had the armature been sliding instead of rolling, for then the treadmill action pushing the gun back would have been avoided. This sliding cannot happen with
That would need excellent machining with very high tolerances, adequate surface coating, maybe a mercury lining, etc. Well beyond my scope, but not for that of any standard research organisation that is well funded.What of practical motors, then? The answer is that it would need technology beyond my scope. What is needed is very good contact between surfaces to make the contact resistance in the order of less than micro-ohms, like a continuous contact really.
Arindam sounds so much better, has a ring to it.https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=7542042632490135&set=pcb.7542144485813283The MKS units of measure for momentum do not have an official name. Call it a slug.
momentum proposed units...10.6 Arindams.
3.57 meters per second * 2.98 kilograms = 10.6 slugs
clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats = crispr DNA tool
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 300 |
Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
Uptime: | 108:35:40 |
Calls: | 6,700 |
Files: | 12,232 |
Messages: | 5,348,481 |