There is no absolute rest
and without influence motion will continue forever...
The rule is perpetual motion instead.
Why haven't astronomical forms stopped
turning? what about their orbits?
Mitchell Raemsch
On Friday, October 27, 2023 at 4:00:51 PM UTC-4, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
There is no absolute rest
and without influence motion will continue forever...
The rule is perpetual motion instead.
Why haven't astronomical forms stopped
turning? what about their orbits?
Mitchell RaemschWell, and the very spinning of galaxies; of excess rotational momentum, supposedly all perfectly balanced to nill, but there ain't no nill in that.
Local versus global... two systems, perhaps? Joined by what then: ah-hah: a substrate; a nearly third body; a gell to fit the two, and in a chill, the three.
On Friday, October 27, 2023 at 3:39:20 PM UTC-7, Timothy Golden wrote:
On Friday, October 27, 2023 at 4:00:51 PM UTC-4, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
There is no absolute rest
and without influence motion will continue forever...
The rule is perpetual motion instead.
Why haven't astronomical forms stopped
turning? what about their orbits?
Galaxies are not really rotating. There are stars in orbit of a center.Mitchell RaemschWell, and the very spinning of galaxies; of excess rotational momentum, supposedly all perfectly balanced to nill, but there ain't no nill in that.
Local versus global... two systems, perhaps? Joined by what then: ah-hah: a substrate; a nearly third body; a gell to fit the two, and in a chill, the three.
On Friday, October 27, 2023 at 9:22:11 PM UTC-4, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:would simply all accrete to its center of mass.
On Friday, October 27, 2023 at 3:39:20 PM UTC-7, Timothy Golden wrote:
On Friday, October 27, 2023 at 4:00:51 PM UTC-4, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
There is no absolute rest
and without influence motion will continue forever...
The rule is perpetual motion instead.
Why haven't astronomical forms stopped
turning? what about their orbits?
This is not a realistic statement. I am sorry, but I will falsify he who I do respect greatly. You can toss all of dark matter trouble out with your statement here. That does not make you wrong, but without the rotation of the material in the galaxy itGalaxies are not really rotating. There are stars in orbit of a center.Mitchell RaemschWell, and the very spinning of galaxies; of excess rotational momentum, supposedly all perfectly balanced to nill, but there ain't no nill in that.
Local versus global... two systems, perhaps? Joined by what then: ah-hah: a substrate; a nearly third body; a gell to fit the two, and in a chill, the three.
That you see the same in your toilet bowl with your morning stool, Mitch... think on that one maybe...
On Saturday, October 28, 2023 at 10:17:17 AM UTC-4, Timothy Golden wrote:it would simply all accrete to its center of mass.
On Friday, October 27, 2023 at 9:22:11 PM UTC-4, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Friday, October 27, 2023 at 3:39:20 PM UTC-7, Timothy Golden wrote:
On Friday, October 27, 2023 at 4:00:51 PM UTC-4, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
There is no absolute rest
and without influence motion will continue forever...
The rule is perpetual motion instead.
Why haven't astronomical forms stopped
turning? what about their orbits?
This is not a realistic statement. I am sorry, but I will falsify he who I do respect greatly. You can toss all of dark matter trouble out with your statement here. That does not make you wrong, but without the rotation of the material in the galaxyGalaxies are not really rotating. There are stars in orbit of a center.Mitchell RaemschWell, and the very spinning of galaxies; of excess rotational momentum, supposedly all perfectly balanced to nill, but there ain't no nill in that.
Local versus global... two systems, perhaps? Joined by what then: ah-hah: a substrate; a nearly third body; a gell to fit the two, and in a chill, the three.
That you see the same in your toilet bowl with your morning stool, Mitch... think on that one maybe...Alright, I take it back. Still I loved the toilet bowl insult. As rhetoric goes that was not a piece of crap was it?
I will confess as well; allow me to relate a story to you in a younger year, in San Diego, California, obsviously, some drunk socal boardwalker says, waiting for his next game of chess in the soft breeze; chicks skating by on four wheeled skates. I hadbiked there from SDSU campus, where I was on exchange. That actually is a respectable ride for a newb to the area. Pacific Beach and Ocean Beach there; I forget which now; a bit north of Mission Bay as I recall. I did play chess; probably lost; and
Anyway, before I made it home I wound up hanging out with a group called Students At The Steps; Hi Deb and Pam and the whole gang of freaks and wannabees and do-gooders making strides; Frank and that crazy snail guy; oh man, what a trip. Anyway, therewas this curly haired freak physicist there; long blond locks and his name is too distant to even hope to recall now. Anyway, I did confide in him in our hangouts there on the campus in the middle of summer awaiting a sailboat race that came and went,
Anyway, I confided in the physics dude that I believed at that time that rotation held the answers; that there is a rotational version of physics which will benefit; and I guess I was thinking universally so.
By definition perpetual motion is the rule.
Inertia without interference shows it...
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 300 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 105:08:42 |
Calls: | 6,700 |
Files: | 12,232 |
Messages: | 5,350,316 |