Alright, the NOVA science tv show has piqued my attention.

Initially I wanted to rewrite all three 1 hour programs and correct the mistakes of NOVA. But in the last episode of Inferno Earth with the Deccan Plateau Volcanics and the Permian Extinction, I had to come face to face with the question of not only
include Continental Drift on a Earth that has a 1/2 permanent dark side and a 1/2 permanent all sun side, but the nagging question of what I am going to call Core Drift and a Pole Drift.

I would not dare do this if no planet in our Solar System had this feature. There is a planet that its Interior Core drifts just like Earth's inner and outer Cores drift much like the Continents drift in plate tectonics. We all know that planet is Uranus.


Almost every astronomer thinks and feels Uranus got that way by bolide meteor strikes. I too thought that. But as of today, I now feel that Uranus has a mobile Core and likely all planets have a mobile core, which drifts from the center of the planet,
and can cause an entire flipping of the planet in its gravitational-bed that the Sun forms of the planet.

I now see the Permian extinction on Earth with killing 90% of all species of life, that it must have been a flipping of the entire planet Earth as the two cores of Earth had migrated so much Off-Center that it caused the entire planet Earth to flip.

Now there is a toy in which you spin it, that it flips over from bottom to top.

This is what is happening to Uranus. It has a molten core that has migrated way way off center of the gas giant planet and is set to flip to right itself of its 98 degree tilt from solar ecliptic.

So, my next three books in a row are to correct NOVA science tv shows, and the fourth is a altogether new concept of geology and astronomy --Planet core flipping as the core migrates off center and creating a new axis of rotation. Which I would then
generalize to stars, as stars would also flip in axis of rotation, going through a period where they rotate on their sides like that of Uranus. This of course has to all be explained by the 6 laws of Electromagnetism.

AP, King of Science, especially Physics
AP's 261st,262nd,263rd,264th books of science --Correcting NOVA's geology series programs Snowball Earth, Life Rising, Inferno Earth. Plus Earth went through a Uranus phase of lying on its side in rotation.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Alright, my Marshak's Essentials of Geology, 3rd ed. 2009 is so good that it can carry me through all the concepts I want to discuss. For Marshak on pages 28 to 29 shows the Inner and Outer Cores of Earth. On pages 38 to 40 talks of a concept of Polar
Wander. Setting the framework for AP's new concept that a planet and star can flip 90 degrees on its axis due to the motion of its cores.

And I should have logically reasoned that Uranus did this, and not the silly bolide strike tilting Uranus axis on its side of 98 degrees. I say this because, well, Uranus is a gas giant, not a rocky terrestrial planet. When you bolide strike Earth in
Cretaceous hitting in northern latitudes you can tilt Earth axis by 23 degrees. But if you strike Uranus, a gas giant similar to Earth, there is nothing to tilt for there is too much gas.

Now is the Red Spot on Jupiter, some sign, some indication of the location of the core of Jupiter??? And can Jupiter flip on its side as has Uranus flipped on its side.

As for stars, are there any binary stars where one has axis north south while its companion has axis east west?

Now I wrote a book on what causes Continental Drift as vibrations from the Earth cores causes continents to shake rattle and roll, just like pots set on top of the refrigerator will vibrate off and fall to the floor.

My 7th published book

Geology: Continents move not by convection currents but by Earth's Core as Motor Vibrations// geology series, book 2
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle)

Last revision was April 2023. This is my 7th published book of science.

Preface: This is my research notebook turned into a textbook covering the early years of 2000 when I noticed refrigerator vibrations caused pots a-top to move and fall off. I started many threads on Usenet of the Vibration theory replacing Convection
Current theory by 2006 to 2008 through 2014 to 2019. Early 2000, I noticed the pots on top of my refrigerator kept falling off due to Vibrations of the electric motor. This caused me to realize that I had a better theory for Continental Drift than the
current mainstream Convection Current theory. All I needed was "deciding evidence". The deciding-evidence came with a science news bulletin of "Tectonic Plate Motion Reversal Near Acapulco". This book is written in the style of my research notebook so as
to follow my thoughts and in search of evidence to prove the Vibration theory for Continental Drift.

Cover Picture: My photograph of the refrigerator with pots on top that lead to this discovery of the Vibration theory that replaces Convection Current theory of Continental Drift.

Product details
ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PRK4MZZ
Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 12, 2019
Language ‏ : ‎ English
File size ‏ : ‎ 1428 KB
Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Sticky notes ‏ : ‎ On Kindle Scribe
Print length ‏ : ‎ 174 pages
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,149,041 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#2249 in Geology (Books)
#349 in Geology (Kindle Store)
#3154 in Physics (Kindle Store)


Very crude dot picture of 5f6 magnetosphere of 231Pu Atom Totality

A torus shape doing the Faraday Law inside of each and every atom.
             ____
       .-'               `-.      
   .'     ::\ ::|:: /::   `.
 /        ::\::|::/::        \               
;             _ _             ;
|            ( O )            |     
;               - -             ;
 \         ::/::|::\::         /      
   `.     ::/ ::|:: \::      .'             
      `-    _____   .-'
     
One of those dots in the magnetosphere is the Milky Way galaxy. And
each dot represents another galaxy. The O is the Cosmic nucleus and
certainly not as dense as what Old Physics thought because in New Physics
the interior of atoms has the Faraday law going on.

I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers.  
Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.

https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe        
Archimedes Plutonium

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Reading Marshak talking about pole reversal and explained as motion of the liquid outer core. Good enough. But no explanation of Pole Wandering. I am going to have to read Marshak several times on these issues. It is the Pole Wandering that like Uranus
tilted 98 degrees and revolving around the Sun on its side, that I make this wild claim, that the Cores inside Earth drift also, not to the point where the cores come near the surface of Earth, but where the cores move some distance away from the exact
center of Earth.

It is also know that Earth is an oblate sphere or ellipsoid with larger equator radius than to poles.

I suspect Polar Wandering as described by Marshak is all due to the wandering of the cores off center.

If true, would mean the axis is dependent on the cores in some sort of EM laws of physics. This would explain Uranus rotation on its side. And come to think of it, it is rather silly to think bolide strikes on a gas giant would shift the axis of rotation
as a bolide has nothing solid to slam into.

Now I seem to vaguely remember that one of the satellites of the gas giants rotates on its side also, unless mistaken.

AP

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Here I need to read Marshak several times over on core and magnetic electric fields of Earth. For I believe that the axis of rotation of Earth, Uranus and other astro bodies follows the core of that body.

The reason Uranus rotates on its side is because its core of Uranus causes and creates that rotation axis.

Now I would like for there to be some other examples-- perhaps some satellites or moons of other planets. Or even binary stars where one is axis of 0 degree and other is 90 degree.

Or the case of Mars which has a huge axis tilt of 23 degrees, same as earth.

I would even settle for a axis tilt of 45 degrees to the Solar ecliptic.

But before I make this into a book, I need broad reassurances that some EM laws of physics involve where a core drifts inside a nearly spherical object like Earth. This drift of core causes Polar Wandering and axis tilt.

It seems like few planets are sphere like and most are oblate-spheres. And is that oblate-sphere caused because of Core-drift.

Numerous times the Earth has a polarity shift where north became south and south became north in polarity, and that is easily explained as the Outer Core is liquid and causing polarity shift. But Polar Wandering has yet to be clearly explained, and I
think Polar Wandering is caused and created by core movement.

AP, King of Science

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Here I set up an experiment similar to Galileo inclined plane. He resorted to an inclined plane because the fall of gravity was just too fast of a speed and acceleration. By using inclined planes, he could then measure the parameters and discover the law.

--- quoting the Web on "Galileo inclined plane concludes" ---

The inclined plane thus allowed Galileo to accurately measure acceleration with simple instruments and ultimately to prove that, in the absence of other forces such as air resistance, gravity causes all falling objects to accelerate toward Earth at the
same rate.Jan 29, 2004

NOVA | Galileo's Inclined Plane - PBS

PBS
https://www.pbs.org › physics › galileos-inclined-plane

What was the result of the inclined plane experiment?
What did Galileo discover about inclined planes?
KNOWMAGINE - Inclined Plane
Galileo used the inclined plane in order to learn about the principles of motion. Inclined planes helped Galileo prove his claim that bodies fall at a constant acceleration - i.e., that their speed increases at a constant rate. Following the proof of
this claim, Galileo came to formulate the law of fall.
--- end quoting ---

What I am going to set up is a inclined plane of small incline and roll a lime, then orange, then grape

Mercury magnetic field strength 1% of Earth or 300 nT

Venus magnetic field strength is 10^-5 times Earth

Earth magnetic field strength 3x10^4nT to 6x10^4nT

Moon magnetic field strength is 1 to 100 nT

Mars magnetic field strength is 10^-4 times Earth
I should include the spin of these astro bodies as equatorial
rotation velocity:

Mercury 11km/h

Venus 6km/h

Earth 1,674 km/h

Moon 18 km/h

Mars 868 km/h

Axial tilt (from wikipedia)
Mercury 2.11 degrees

Venus 177.3degrees Venus is rotating the reverse of other planets,
retrograde rotation

Earth 23degrees ;
Moon 1.5 degrees to ecliptic

Mars 25.19 degrees

Jupiter 3.13 degrees

Saturn 26.73 degrees

Uranus 97.77 degrees

Neptune 28.32 degrees

Alright, let me keep adding to the magnetic fields of planets table:
Jupiter's magnetic field 14X larger than Earth's

Saturn magnetic field about the same as Earth

Uranus an asymmetrical magnetosphere 0.23 gauss

Neptune similar to Uranus only 0.14 gauss

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Alright, well, I have enough data to see the axis tilt is a pattern, not of bolide strikes upon planets, but a pattern of tne core of the planet causing axis tilting.

In Marshak's geology textbook he speaks of Polar shifting, which is easily explained as that of the Outer liquid Core moving in opposite direction. But Marshak also discusses Polar Wandering, which is difficult to explain by cores, unless Cores move just
as Continent Drift Plate Tectonics moves, and both in conjunction of one another.

Here is the data that implies Core movement as the cause of Polar Wandering. And we can begin to give that a new name-- Axis Tilt Wandering.

Earth 23degrees ;
Moon 1.5 degrees to ecliptic

Mars 25.19 degrees

Jupiter 3.13 degrees

Saturn 26.73 degrees

Uranus 97.77 degrees

Neptune 28.32 degrees

Notice the three gas giants all have enormous tilt on axis compared to Sun ecliptic. And if bolide strikes is the cause, then bolide strikes would have to strike something solid in a gas giant--- like a core. But since all but Jupiter has a enormous tilt,
suggests that bolide striking is not the cause of axis tilt but rather the planet's own interior core causes axis tilting, axis wandering.

Now for me to offer this as a theory of astronomy and geology, I must be happy with a EM law that would provide such a mechanism. And here I offer both the Ampere law with its Right Hand Rule and offer Faraday law with its thrusting bar magnet and coil
to produce electricity.

The Faraday law suggests the Inner and Outer Cores of Earth are shaped more like a Torus for the Outer Core that is liquid, and the Inner core can be solid but occupies the donut hole of the Outer core torus.

So here I am going to ask for geologists and physicists to go back and more carefully measure the Outer Core as shaped like a torus with the inner core occupying the donut hole of the outer core torus.

If it turns out the case that AP is correct on the Outer Core being a torus configuration, then it is easily seen that the torus can occupy a 3 degree tilt to the inner core as in Jupiter or a 28 degree tilt as in Neptune or a 98 degree tilt as in Uranus.

But, where the observational proof will really come is when we observe binary or ternary star systems where some are axial tilt 90 degrees from others.

Now bolides could have affected the gas giants by an imbalance in the gas giant core to give Neptune a 28 degree axis tilt. But because a axis tilt is predominant over a non axis tilt, we have to say that core mechanics of motion causes axis tilting in
most cases.

AP, King of Science

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

More data, courtesy Wikipedia:

Mercury
mean radius 2,439 km
flattening 0
axial tilt almost 0 degree

Venus
mean radius 6,051 km
flattening 0
axial tilt 2.6 degrees


Earth
equatorial radius 6378 km
polar radius 6356 km
flattening 0.00335
axial tilt 23.4 degrees


Mars
equatorial radius 3,396 km
polar radius 3,376 km
flattening 0.005
axial tilt 25.1 degrees

Jupiter
equatorial radius 71,492 km
polar radius 66,854 km
flattening 0.0648
axial tilt 3.1 degrees

Saturn
equatorial radius 60,268 km
polar radius 54,364 km
flattening 0.0979
axial tilt 26.7 degrees


Uranus
equatorial radius 25,559 km
polar radius 24,973 km
flattening 0.0229
axial tilt 97.7 degrees

Neptune
equatorial radius 24,764 km
polar radius 24,341 km
flattening 0.0171
axial tilt 28.3 degrees

Pluto
mean radius 1,188 km
flattening less than 1%
axial tilt 122.5 degrees

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Sunday, October 29, 2023 at 11:33:16 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:

More data, courtesy Wikipedia:

Mercury
mean radius 2,439 km
flattening 0
axial tilt almost 0 degree

Venus
mean radius 6,051 km
flattening 0
axial tilt 2.6 degrees

Earth
equatorial radius 6378 km
polar radius 6356 km
flattening 0.00335
axial tilt 23.4 degrees

Mars
equatorial radius 3,396 km
polar radius 3,376 km
flattening 0.005
axial tilt 25.1 degrees

Jupiter
equatorial radius 71,492 km
polar radius 66,854 km
flattening 0.0648
axial tilt 3.1 degrees

Saturn
equatorial radius 60,268 km
polar radius 54,364 km
flattening 0.0979
axial tilt 26.7 degrees

Uranus
equatorial radius 25,559 km
polar radius 24,973 km
flattening 0.0229
axial tilt 97.7 degrees

Neptune
equatorial radius 24,764 km
polar radius 24,341 km
flattening 0.0171
axial tilt 28.3 degrees

Pluto
mean radius 1,188 km
flattening less than 1%
axial tilt 122.5 degrees

So here is what I propose. That we have Axis Tilt Wandering, not Polar Wandering. And the Wandering occurs due to two cores, a central solid core of mostly iron and a outer liquid core of mostly iron, in all the above planets except for Pluto.

The Outer Liquid core is shaped as a torus and the Inner Core is shaped like a sphere that is the bar magnet of the planet core, while the liquid torus outer core acts as a coil in Faraday law. This coil liquid produces electricity which makes up the
Magnetic and Electric field of the planet.

As the torus liquid outer core gets deformed over time the entire planets axis of rotation wanders with respect to the deformity.

As for Polar Magnetic field shift, that is explained as a reversal of motion of the outer liquid core.

AP

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Here I am working on Geometry Physics. I do not think you can have a Faraday law of a inner sphere as bar magnet and outer sphere as molten liquid coil of Faraday law. I suspect some asymmetry is required rather than two spheres.

So the asymmetry would be provided if the outer core liquid iron is more of a torus than a sphere.

So here I need for the geophysicists to look through their seismology data and see if indeed the outer core is more of a Torus than a sphere of molten iron.

AP

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Alright, I think I can prove this Physics Conjecture from the math calculus involved in EM laws.

Conjecture:: Two spheres, one inside the other (as per Earth cores) cannot be Faraday law because of the symmetry. For Faraday law needs asymmetry such as the thrusting of bar magnet inside the coil. When we thrust outside the coil, no electricity is
produced and no Faraday law.

This then leads to the request of geophysicists to review their data on Earth cores, inner and outer to see if the outer core is in the Geometrical shape of a Torus, not a sphere. Leaving the inner core of Earth as a solid that lies in the donut hole of
the outer core.

Such a geometry configuration then allows for a Polar Wandering, which is better named Earth Axis of Rotation wandering which according to page 40 of Marshak's Essentials of Geology almost reached the equator and would in that instance be like Uranus,
rotate on its side.

Rotation Axis of a Planet has to be seen as a Coulomb force of attraction set up by the core/s of that planet. Every planet has at least a tiny rotation, but as moons and satellites surround the planet, the rotation on axis increases to faster speeds.

AP

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

The task before me is to prove Faraday's law and Ampere's law cannot involve spherical coils, wires, or magnets. That they involve circles or circuits which can be layered into a coil cylinder or a coil torus. Or in the most simple case, a circuit wire.

The mathematics of mathematical geometry is this::


Using the Quotient Rule, which is (f/gh)' = (f'gh - fg'h - fgh')/(gh)^2 

(V/C*L)' = B' =  (V'*C*L - V*C' *L - V*C*L') / (C*L)^2 

Maxwell had two terms in the Ampere-Maxwell law-- the produced magnetic field and a displacement current, but above we see we have also a third new term.

Faraday Law

(V/B*L)' = C' =  (V'*B*L - V*B' *L - V*B*L') / (B*L)^2

Here I use L angular momentum in place of Electric field E. The V is voltage, B magnetic field, C is coulomb current.

The differential equations of Electromagnetic theory do not allow for a sphere geometry for you cannot have a Faraday law nor a Ampere law in magnets as spheres or current Electric field as spheres.

The math proof is easy that no spheres are allowed in the Faraday or Ampere law. However the geology, geophysics of seismology proof is more difficult to interpret the waves sent down to the two cores of Earth, inner and outer cores is more difficult to
see that the inner and outer cores are shaped more like a cylinder plug, both the inner core like a cylinder plug and outer liquid core like a cylinder plug. But then, no seismologist had a assignment-- show that the cores are not spheres.

Once we give seismologists the very idea-- they are cylinders, not spheres-- will they design their seismic waves to look for a cylinder and find the cylinder.

AP, King of Science

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Alright, I need to devise a Engineering Experiment on Electricity and Magnetism laws of Faraday and Ampere. To show that a Sphere configuration is opposed to electricity and magnetism.

Experiment, take a circuit of copper wire and hook up a electric source and measure the current. Now weld onto that circuit a small sphere of copper in the path of the wire. Measure the current and see how far the current goes down. If still a current
weld on another small sphere, and keep doing it until no current traverses the wire.

Do the same with a sphere ball connected to a circuit that works. Once connected, no more electricity traverses the circuit.

Experiment with other shapes-- ellipsoid, oval attachements to a working circuit that stops the current flow.

I would guess that the data follows a direct linear data, much like Ohm's law is linear pattern V = current * resistance.

And so we can correlate the shape of the circuit when it encounters a sphere shape, it is equal to a Resistance of the current.

This research is not only important to pure EM theory of physics, but even more important to the geophysics of the inner and outer cores, must not be spheres to have a Polar Wandering or as I like to call it Axis of Rotation Wandering.

AP

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Now Amazon sells what it calls "sphere magnets" and here I am trying to prove you cannot have magnetism in a sphere geometry, nor electricity.

So looking more closely at the specifications of these so called sphere magnets, we see that they are contructed from a cylinder configuration and layers are added to look like a sphere.


AP

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Alright today starts the write up of my 262nd book of science.

I have proven from the AP-EM Equations, differential equations that the Earth two cores-- Inner and Outer cores are shaped more like a Cylinder than a sphere and that the outer liquid core is somewhat a Coil Cylinder.

What this does is cause Core Drift at the center of Earth and causes the axis of Rotation to drift from Geographical North Pole and South Pole.

Define Geographical North Pole and South Pole as that of a perpendicular to the Sun's Ecliptic Plane. At present, Earth Axis is tilted 23 degrees from this perpendicular of the ecliptic plane.

This is because the Inner and Outer Cores of Earth as a cylinder shaped plug having a flat surface on both ends of the plug are pointed in that direction to make the axis of rotation 23 degrees off perpendicular.

This easily explains why Uranus has a 97 degree tilt and Saturn and Neptune huge tilts. For their cores as cylinder plugs are pointed off the perpendicular.

Now, why has seismology not noticed the cylinder geometry of the Earth two cores?? Why? I suspect no-one in geophysics was astute enough to start the radio waves from the Magnetic North Pole or Magnetic South Pole.
When you do this radio wave bouncing off the Earth Core from California, you end up believing the cores are perfect spheres.

Data, courtesy Wikipedia:

Mercury
mean radius 2,439 km
flattening 0
axial tilt almost 0 degree

Venus
mean radius 6,051 km
flattening 0
axial tilt 2.6 degrees


Earth
equatorial radius 6378 km
polar radius 6356 km
flattening 0.00335
axial tilt 23.4 degrees


Mars
equatorial radius 3,396 km
polar radius 3,376 km
flattening 0.005
axial tilt 25.1 degrees

Jupiter
equatorial radius 71,492 km
polar radius 66,854 km
flattening 0.0648
axial tilt 3.1 degrees

Saturn
equatorial radius 60,268 km
polar radius 54,364 km
flattening 0.0979
axial tilt 26.7 degrees


Uranus
equatorial radius 25,559 km
polar radius 24,973 km
flattening 0.0229
axial tilt 97.7 degrees

Neptune
equatorial radius 24,764 km
polar radius 24,341 km
flattening 0.0171
axial tilt 28.3 degrees

Pluto
mean radius 1,188 km
flattening less than 1%
axial tilt 122.5 degrees

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Wednesday, November 1, 2023 at 5:37:24 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:

Alright today starts the write up of my 262nd book of science.

I have proven from the AP-EM Equations, differential equations that the Earth two cores-- Inner and Outer cores are shaped more like a Cylinder than a sphere and that the outer liquid core is somewhat a Coil Cylinder.

What this does is cause Core Drift at the center of Earth and causes the axis of Rotation to drift from Geographical North Pole and South Pole.

Define Geographical North Pole and South Pole as that of a perpendicular to the Sun's Ecliptic Plane. At present, Earth Axis is tilted 23 degrees from this perpendicular of the ecliptic plane.

This is because the Inner and Outer Cores of Earth as a cylinder shaped plug having a flat surface on both ends of the plug are pointed in that direction to make the axis of rotation 23 degrees off perpendicular.

This easily explains why Uranus has a 97 degree tilt and Saturn and Neptune huge tilts. For their cores as cylinder plugs are pointed off the perpendicular.

Now, why has seismology not noticed the cylinder geometry of the Earth two cores?? Why? I suspect no-one in geophysics was astute enough to start the radio waves from the Magnetic North Pole or Magnetic South Pole.
When you do this radio wave bouncing off the Earth Core from California, you end up believing the cores are perfect spheres.

Data, courtesy Wikipedia:
Mercury
mean radius 2,439 km
flattening 0
axial tilt almost 0 degree

Venus
mean radius 6,051 km
flattening 0
axial tilt 2.6 degrees

Earth
equatorial radius 6378 km
polar radius 6356 km
flattening 0.00335
axial tilt 23.4 degrees

Mars
equatorial radius 3,396 km
polar radius 3,376 km
flattening 0.005
axial tilt 25.1 degrees

Jupiter
equatorial radius 71,492 km
polar radius 66,854 km
flattening 0.0648
axial tilt 3.1 degrees

Saturn
equatorial radius 60,268 km
polar radius 54,364 km
flattening 0.0979
axial tilt 26.7 degrees

Uranus
equatorial radius 25,559 km
polar radius 24,973 km
flattening 0.0229
axial tilt 97.7 degrees

Neptune
equatorial radius 24,764 km
polar radius 24,341 km
flattening 0.0171
axial tilt 28.3 degrees

Pluto
mean radius 1,188 km
flattening less than 1%
axial tilt 122.5 degrees

Alright, looks as though I have 5 books to write. The first is the idea of a Core drift in Earth and planets. Not only does Earth have Continental Drift but also Core drift, and the two are probably connected to one another.

This core drift in conjunction with continental drift and the fact that the Moon had not arrived to Earth until 90 to 66 million years ago easily explains the mass extinctions, for Earth had a permanent dark side and a permanent all sunshine side for
without a Moon, the day rotation equals the year revolution.

Now to look at the above data of axial tilt we have 9 astro bodies.
Adding 0 + 2.6 + 23.4 + 25.1 + 3.1 + 26.7 + 97.7 + 28.3 + 32.5. Now Pluto's 122.5 translates in a axis tilt of 32.5 from perpendicular of Sun ecleptic.

Now adding up those axial tilts and dividing by 9 gives 239.4/9 = 26.6 degrees on average for a axial tilt of planet in the solar system.

Now in Old Astronomy and Old Geology, their only explanation of why a axis tilts is their idea that in the past, some asteroid struck the planet and moved its axis of rotation.

In AP's EM explanation, the cores of planets drift as do the continents drift. The cores are cylinder plug shaped in geometry with a outer liquid iron core and inner solid iron core and these cores have mobility and move and causes the planet axis of
rotation to move. The 97.7 degree tilt of Uranus rotating on its side is likely the cause of Earth's Permian mass extinction for a rotation on its side would have put the continents on the dark side of Earth in cold frigid and no sunshine, while the
ocean baked in constant sunshine.

So the average is 26.6 degrees. And if planetary axis of rotation were caused by strikes from asteroids or other bodies, we would not see a pattern of axial tilt with most being 26 degrees on average.

Now I am the author of the idea of Primal Axiom of Science-- All is Atom and Atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism.

That primal axiom means the explanation of all science ends up being some form of electricity and magnetism explanation. That means the bend angle of DNA molecule of 36 degrees is explained by electricity and magnetism. And the average angle of axial
rotation in the Solar System of 26.6 degrees must come also from electricity and magnetism.

AP

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Alright, tonight was the last in this series Ancient Earth: Humans, and I am disgusted with the propaganda of this series-- blaming most bad events on CO2 buildup in the atmosphere. For that is not science but propaganda. None of the extinctions of the
past geological history were due to CO2 buildup, none.

Interesting that one quoted the Cretaceous extinction as killing 75% of all species, while the Permian extinction killed over 90% of all species.

And so I am going to rewrite this episode also.

The cause of most past extinctions is the idea that the Moon had not arrived as a companion to Earth until 90-66 million years ago, leaving 1/2 of Earth in constant sunlight and the other 1/2 of Earth in constant darkness, and depending on Continental
Drift, whether a supercontinent was on the darkside of Earth or on the always Sunshine of Earth.

The problem I need to work out is the Drifting of Axis of Rotation, so that as in the Permian, the greatest mass extinction, the Axis of Rotation put the land masses on the dark side of Earth in as short a time span as 300,000 years, leaving the oceans
to bake as a hottub.

AP

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Alright, in all my works and workings of science, math especially physics I never expected a Nexus of angles in geometry, math to come together with quantity in physics as it is coming together with Earth Cores and Axis of Rotation. Never would I guess
I can assemble these concepts of angle versus quantity of physics by a study of the geology and astronomy of Earth cores.

I thought this nexus would have to come directly from the AP-EM differential equations of the EM theory. But in hindsight, all of physics and math comes together with hands on experience with somewhat mundane events and study.

In my recent book of Constants, I marvel at how the Fine Structure Constant is easily begot from noting this constant is actually a Angle 0.0072, for if given 840 narrow rings and tasked to form a torus from those rings by careful placement, the Fine
Structure Constant of physics popps out in the construction of that torus.

But now, I am faced with an even greater nexus of quantity versus angle.

Psi squared is the probability amplitude squared, and well known in quantum mechanics. Electricity current is a surface phenomenom. Squaring is surface area.

Cubing is volume and is magnetism.

So here we have the data of 9 planets, and the majority are between 20 and 36 degrees off the Sun Perpendicular of the Ecliptic Plane. This is an angle of magnetism in 3rd dimension. Electricity, remember is 2nd dimension for electricity is a surface
phenomenon.

Pi to the power of 2.71... is 22.459....

And 2.71... to the power of pi is 23.140....

Curiously since many of the terms in the AP-EM differential equations are subtraction terms we have 2.71^3.14 subtract 3.14 = 19.999.... as virtually equaling 20.

I already proved that in those AP-EM differential equations of the Laws of Electromagnetism that the geometry of a Sphere is a resistance in electricity and in magnetism. Although I still await the Experimental proof of creating sphere nodules onto a
conducting wire and watch the resistance go up and the electric current to fall.

The 2.71... number is the pi of ellipses and ovals. The 3.14... number is obviously the number for circles or spheres.

I await in fascination that the geophysicists when they re-do their seismology of the inner and outer cores of Earth will discover that those two cores both are shaped like a Cylindrical Plug that has the ability to move up and down on its flattened
cylinder ends and is able to rotate. Rotate so much that like Uranus, has a Axis of Rotation that is 98 degrees from Polar North as defined as a perpendicular of Sun ecliptic plane.

So what AP is claiming, is that the axis of rotation of planets is due to the EM laws of a cylinder plug like core/s.

The numbers for tilt in astronomy for the planets are too systematic to be caused by collisions of asteroids. Although a asteroid strike of Earth in late Cretaceous can speed up the axis tilt into a new angle.

AP

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

--- quoting from Yale dot Scientific dot org ---

Secrets of the Earth’s Core: New research contradicts what we thought we knew
March 29, 2015

This multi-layered picture of the earth’s core has been broadly accepted for nearly a century, but recent evidence from the University of Illinois forces us to rethink it. Using the most accurate seismology equipment available, professor Xiaodong Song
and his team performed a study on the aftershocks of earthquakes, using them like an ultrasound to probe the structure of the earth. For the most part, Song’s findings agreed with conventional wisdom — but not when it came to the inner core. The
earth’s core is not, Song’s group realized, a homogenous iron sphere. Rather, it contains two distinct layers, each with unique properties and magnetic orientations.

A new structure of the planet’s inner core was proposed by professor Xiaodong Song of the University of Illinois. Image Courtesy of the University of Illinois.
A new structure of the pla

On Thursday, November 2, 2023 at 3:19:28 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:

Alright, in all my works and workings of science, math especially physics I never expected a Nexus of angles in geometry, math to come together with quantity in physics as it is coming together with Earth Cores and Axis of Rotation. Never would I guess

I can assemble these concepts of angle versus quantity of physics by a study of the geology and astronomy of Earth cores.

I thought this nexus would have to come directly from the AP-EM differential equations of the EM theory. But in hindsight, all of physics and math comes together with hands on experience with somewhat mundane events and study.

In my recent book of Constants, I marvel at how the Fine Structure Constant is easily begot from noting this constant is actually a Angle 0.0072, for if given 840 narrow rings and tasked to form a torus from those rings by careful placement, the Fine

Structure Constant of physics popps out in the construction of that torus.

But now, I am faced with an even greater nexus of quantity versus angle.

Psi squared is the probability amplitude squared, and well known in quantum mechanics. Electricity current is a surface phenomenom. Squaring is surface area.

Cubing is volume and is magnetism.

So here we have the data of 9 planets, and the majority are between 20 and 36 degrees off the Sun Perpendicular of the Ecliptic Plane. This is an angle of magnetism in 3rd dimension. Electricity, remember is 2nd dimension for electricity is a surface

phenomenon.

Pi to the power of 2.71... is 22.459....

And 2.71... to the power of pi is 23.140....

This begs the question of whether in whole numbers-- 1, 2, 3, .... we ever have a algebra of A^B = B^A? Now 1^2 misses 2^1 by 1 and so does 2^3 misses 3^2 by 1. But is this true throughout the Whole Numbers, no equality for A^B = B^A???

Let me add one more condition. We are allowed 1/2 between each Whole Number 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, ..... Now, is there a A^B = B^A ??? I wonder. For I do not have a ready made disproof of that.

Curiously since many of the terms in the AP-EM differential equations are subtraction terms we have 2.71^3.14 subtract 3.14 = 19.999.... as virtually equaling 20.

Now say we used pi as equaling the square root of 10 = 3.16227..... what fascinating results would we get in that case? Note, that I am formulating this as Psi probability function in quantum mechanics. I could not pick two better constants in all of
physics and math than to pick 2.71.... and pi to determine the shape of Earth's two cores.

AP

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)