On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 7:01:14 AM UTC-7, Jim Pennino wrote:
Solving Tornadoes <solvingt...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sunday, October 22, 2023 at 11:36:12 PM UTC-7, Paul Alsing wrote:
Fucking morons. Let's keep it simple. Explain how a person would verify that the moisture in clear moist air is genuinely gaseous, you fucking vague nitwit. Go ahead, explain the procedure, dumbass.
The answer is you can't and it's never been done.
You simpleton's ASSUME that clear moist air is gaseous. You idiots can do that because you are not scientists. I am a scientist. Nobody cares what you but scratchers chose to believe. Sorry, but science requires verification.
Read a dang textbook... if you can actually read...
LOL Okay, butt scratcher. Let's keep it simple. Describe the procedures one would take to detect whether the moisture in clear moist air is genuinely gaseous (as you maintain) or nanodroplets of invisibly small liquid (as I maintain).
Put up or shut up, you butt scratching imbecile.
OK, it is all in Dalton's essays of 1802 as you have been told many
times before, crackpot.
A photocopy of Dalton's essays of 1802 can be found in the Memoirs of
the Literary and Philosophical Society of Manchester, page 535.
https://books.google.com/books?id=3qdJAAAAYAAJ&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false
These essays fully describe experiments, methods used and the data
collected that were conducted by John Dalton in the late 18th and
early 19th Century on the properties of various gases, including
the gaseous phase of substances that are normally liquid such as water.
The results of these experiments and their data clearly and unambiguously show that all of the "theories" of James McGinn are utter and complete nonsense.
So, it's clear and unambiguous, but you can't find it?
Can you not see that this makes no sense at all?
James McGinn / Genius
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)