Fucking morons. Let's keep it simple. Explain how a person would verify that the moisture in clear moist air is genuinely gaseous, you fucking vague nitwit. Go ahead, explain the procedure, dumbass.
The answer is you can't and it's never been done.
You simpleton's ASSUME that clear moist air is gaseous. You idiots can do that because you are not scientists. I am a scientist. Nobody cares what you but scratchers chose to believe. Sorry, but science requires verification.Read a dang textbook... if you can actually read...
On Sunday, October 22, 2023 at 11:36:12 PM UTC-7, Paul Alsing wrote:
Fucking morons. Let's keep it simple. Explain how a person would verify that the moisture in clear moist air is genuinely gaseous, you fucking vague nitwit. Go ahead, explain the procedure, dumbass.Read a dang textbook... if you can actually read...
The answer is you can't and it's never been done.
You simpleton's ASSUME that clear moist air is gaseous. You idiots can do that because you are not scientists. I am a scientist. Nobody cares what you but scratchers chose to believe. Sorry, but science requires verification.
LOL Okay, butt scratcher. Let's keep it simple. Describe the procedures one would take to detect whether the moisture in clear moist air is genuinely gaseous (as you maintain) or nanodroplets of invisibly small liquid (as I maintain).
Put up or shut up, you butt scratching imbecile.
James McGinn / Delusionally Insane Crackpot
Solving Tornadoes <solvingt...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sunday, October 22, 2023 at 11:36:12 PM UTC-7, Paul Alsing wrote:
Fucking morons. Let's keep it simple. Explain how a person would verify that the moisture in clear moist air is genuinely gaseous, you fucking vague nitwit. Go ahead, explain the procedure, dumbass.Read a dang textbook... if you can actually read...
The answer is you can't and it's never been done.
You simpleton's ASSUME that clear moist air is gaseous. You idiots can do that because you are not scientists. I am a scientist. Nobody cares what you but scratchers chose to believe. Sorry, but science requires verification.
LOL Okay, butt scratcher. Let's keep it simple. Describe the procedures one would take to detect whether the moisture in clear moist air is genuinely gaseous (as you maintain) or nanodroplets of invisibly small liquid (as I maintain).
Put up or shut up, you butt scratching imbecile.
James McGinn / Delusionally Insane Crackpot
And once again the delusionally insane crackpot posts his nonsense
twice in the delusional belief that posting it twice makes it less
insane.
So once again:
A photocopy of Dalton's essays of 1802 can be found in the Memoirs of
the Literary and Philosophical Society of Manchester, page 535.
https://books.google.com/books?id=3qdJAAAAYAAJ&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false
These essays fully describe experiments, methods used and the data
collected that were conducted by John Dalton in the late 18th and
early 19th Century on the properties of various gases, including
the gaseous phase of substances that are normally liquid such as water.
The results of these experiments and their data clearly and unambiguously show that all of the "theories" of James McGinn are utter and complete nonsense.
They show, among many other things:
Gaseous H2O exists both below the boiling point of water and below the freezing point of water.
Partial pressure of gases exist.
Evaporation is liquid water becoming gaseous below the boiling point
of water.
McGinn has ranted and raved for years that there are no such experiments, yet here they are and they are over 200 years old and have been repeated verified thousands upon thousands of times.
McGinn will never read any of these essays because that would destroy
his delusions, and even if by some miracle he did read them, he can
not provide any rational objection to them as he has no experiments
or data of his own.
McGinn is now left with nothing to say other than to babble childish nonsense and depraved insults.
On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 7:16:09 AM UTC-7, Jim Pennino wrote:
Solving Tornadoes <solvingt...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sunday, October 22, 2023 at 11:36:12 PM UTC-7, Paul Alsing wrote:
Fucking morons. Let's keep it simple. Explain how a person would verify that the moisture in clear moist air is genuinely gaseous, you fucking vague nitwit. Go ahead, explain the procedure, dumbass.Read a dang textbook... if you can actually read...
The answer is you can't and it's never been done.
You simpleton's ASSUME that clear moist air is gaseous. You idiots can do that because you are not scientists. I am a scientist. Nobody cares what you but scratchers chose to believe. Sorry, but science requires verification.
LOL Okay, butt scratcher. Let's keep it simple. Describe the procedures one would take to detect whether the moisture in clear moist air is genuinely gaseous (as you maintain) or nanodroplets of invisibly small liquid (as I maintain).
Put up or shut up, you butt scratching imbecile.
James McGinn / Delusionally Insane Crackpot
And once again the delusionally insane crackpot posts his nonsense
twice in the delusional belief that posting it twice makes it less
insane.
So once again:
A photocopy of Dalton's essays of 1802 can be found in the Memoirs of
the Literary and Philosophical Society of Manchester, page 535.
https://books.google.com/books?id=3qdJAAAAYAAJ&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false
These essays fully describe experiments, methods used and the data
collected that were conducted by John Dalton in the late 18th and
early 19th Century on the properties of various gases, including
the gaseous phase of substances that are normally liquid such as water.
The results of these experiments and their data clearly and unambiguously
show that all of the "theories" of James McGinn are utter and complete
nonsense.
They show, among many other things:
Gaseous H2O exists both below the boiling point of water and below the
freezing point of water.
Partial pressure of gases exist.
Evaporation is liquid water becoming gaseous below the boiling point
of water.
McGinn has ranted and raved for years that there are no such experiments,
yet here they are and they are over 200 years old and have been repeated
verified thousands upon thousands of times.
McGinn will never read any of these essays because that would destroy
his delusions, and even if by some miracle he did read them, he can
not provide any rational objection to them as he has no experiments
or data of his own.
McGinn is now left with nothing to say other than to babble childish
nonsense and depraved insults.
You got nothing!!!
James McGinn <jimmc...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 7:16:09 AM UTC-7, Jim Pennino wrote:
Solving Tornadoes <solvingt...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sunday, October 22, 2023 at 11:36:12 PM UTC-7, Paul Alsing wrote: >> >
Fucking morons. Let's keep it simple. Explain how a person would verify that the moisture in clear moist air is genuinely gaseous, you fucking vague nitwit. Go ahead, explain the procedure, dumbass.Read a dang textbook... if you can actually read...
The answer is you can't and it's never been done.
You simpleton's ASSUME that clear moist air is gaseous. You idiots can do that because you are not scientists. I am a scientist. Nobody cares what you but scratchers chose to believe. Sorry, but science requires verification.
LOL Okay, butt scratcher. Let's keep it simple. Describe the procedures one would take to detect whether the moisture in clear moist air is genuinely gaseous (as you maintain) or nanodroplets of invisibly small liquid (as I maintain).
Put up or shut up, you butt scratching imbecile.
James McGinn / Delusionally Insane Crackpot
And once again the delusionally insane crackpot posts his nonsense
twice in the delusional belief that posting it twice makes it less
insane.
So once again:
A photocopy of Dalton's essays of 1802 can be found in the Memoirs of
the Literary and Philosophical Society of Manchester, page 535.
https://books.google.com/books?id=3qdJAAAAYAAJ&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false
These essays fully describe experiments, methods used and the data
collected that were conducted by John Dalton in the late 18th and
early 19th Century on the properties of various gases, including
the gaseous phase of substances that are normally liquid such as water. >>
The results of these experiments and their data clearly and unambiguously >> show that all of the "theories" of James McGinn are utter and complete
nonsense.
They show, among many other things:
Gaseous H2O exists both below the boiling point of water and below the
freezing point of water.
Partial pressure of gases exist.
Evaporation is liquid water becoming gaseous below the boiling point
of water.
McGinn has ranted and raved for years that there are no such experiments, >> yet here they are and they are over 200 years old and have been repeated >> verified thousands upon thousands of times.
McGinn will never read any of these essays because that would destroy
his delusions, and even if by some miracle he did read them, he can
not provide any rational objection to them as he has no experiments
or data of his own.
McGinn is now left with nothing to say other than to babble childish
nonsense and depraved insults.
You got nothing!!!So says the uneducated, unemployable and delusionally insane crackpot
with a multiple personality disorder that makes him post everything
twice and who refuses to read any books, including dictionaries, because
the content of books threaten his delusions.
McGinn's delusions leaves him with nothing to say other than to babble insane nonsense and obscene insults as he has no actual knowledge of
any subject and becomes angry and terrified when confronted with actual facts.
Meanwhile, the real world has thousands of years of history with untold numbers of scientists doing an untold number of documented experiments,
all of which can be found in books by people who are not terrified of reading them because of crippling delusions, crackpot.
On Sunday, October 22, 2023 at 11:36:12 PM UTC-7, Paul Alsing wrote:
Fucking morons. Let's keep it simple. Explain how a person would verify that the moisture in clear moist air is genuinely gaseous, you fucking vague nitwit. Go ahead, explain the procedure, dumbass.
The answer is you can't and it's never been done.
You simpleton's ASSUME that clear moist air is gaseous. You idiots can do that because you are not scientists. I am a scientist. Nobody cares what you but scratchers chose to believe. Sorry, but science requires verification.Read a dang textbook... if you can actually read...
LOL Okay, butt scratcher. Let's keep it simple. Describe the procedures one would take to detect whether the moisture in clear moist air is genuinely gaseous (as you maintain) or nanodroplets of invisibly small liquid (as I maintain).
Put up or shut up, you butt scratching imbecile.
James McGinn / Genius
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 300 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 100:30:47 |
| Calls: | 6,700 |
| Calls today: | 5 |
| Files: | 12,232 |
| Messages: | 5,349,820 |