On Sunday, 1 October 2023 at 13:57:38 UTC+11, Arindam Banerjee wrote:

On Sunday, 1 October 2023 at 09:31:53 UTC+11, Arindam Banerjee wrote:

On Sunday, 1 October 2023 at 00:00:39 UTC+10, Arindam Banerjee wrote:

Simple enough for any engineer to understand, but not for the dogmatic sorts.
Some kid has made that sort of wheel run a generator which lights a bulb and runs a fan.
That is on Facebook, believe it or not.
If it works, those who need small amounts of power can repeat what is shown there.
The busting of some dearly held beliefs by academics will be a by product.
Good.

https://www.facebook.com/3TechnologyVDO/videos/3726646404221033
This time, using a single powerful permanent magnet used in microwave ovens.

This puzzled me for a while. Was it a hoax? Now after working it out I do not think so, but I may need to explain. It is ingenious. Two screws are used with copper wire to form a reasonably powerful electromagnet, considering the steel cores. Now see

how they are placed in a NS-SN configuration. There is a very poweful permanent magnet, for the type used in microwave ovens, attached to the armature of a small DC generator. The output leads from the generator are connected to the two ends of the
electromagnets. A resistance is put to control the current. To begin with nothing happens, then it is jump started with a separate battery. After this jumpstart the battery is taken away and perpetual motion is established. The question now is, is this a
hoax and if so, how. Or, how is it done? Well, my thinking is that the electromagnets create a steady magnetic field, which is discontinous at the centre due to the way the winding is done. The North of the permanent magnet is pulled one way, and the
South is pushed, causing the rotation. But after half a turn, there should be repulsion causing it to stop? Why does it keep on rotating? My thought is that the inertia from the heavy permanent magnet keeps it moving, despite the force/torque that
opposes this motion for one half of the cycle when the magnetic fields try to stop it being opposed - north faces north and south faces south. If the resistance is too low, then more current will go through the electromagnet causing stronger magnetic
field which would make the permanent magnet move too fast, perhaps then causing some mishap. The energy is not really free, you have to put it all together - it is direct energy from the sun that is free!

And
https://www.facebook.com/greatdiyidea/videos/603231088687771

Amazing how street kids are wiser than all the bald (or not bald) beardos(or clean-shaven) in the Physics Departments of all the world's universities, great and small.
The One True God has a sense of humour.

Now this is really Divine, fixing those pompous fancypants atheistic-robotic e=mcc sorts as the most blithering imbeciles.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Monday, 2 October 2023 at 10:19:52 UTC+11, Sylvia Else wrote:

On 02-Oct-23 8:41 am, Arindam Banerjee wrote:

Now this is really Divine, fixing those pompous fancypants atheistic-robotic e=mcc sorts as the most blithering imbeciles.

Are you really so naive as to believe a blantant fraud?

No, it is not a fraud. Those who believe in the law of conservation of energy are frauds.
Getting energy from magnets, or gravity, makes perfect sense, and is consistent with my new physics.
(Which is based upon busting inertia and that is proved with a new kind of electric motor that I have invented.)

The Chinese have been selling free energy motors for quite a while.
Now, kids have used soda bottles, bicycle wheels, dc motors, etc. to get power.

From that, to throwing rotten tomatoes at the esteemed and ridiculous e=mcc wallahs, is but a step.

Sylvia.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Monday, 2 October 2023 at 10:46:10 UTC+11, Jim Pennino wrote:

Sylvia Else <syl...@email.invalid> wrote:

On 02-Oct-23 8:41 am, Arindam Banerjee wrote:

Now this is really Divine, fixing those pompous fancypants atheistic-robotic e=mcc sorts as the most blithering imbeciles.

Are you really so naive as to believe a blantant fraud?

Sylvia.

No, but he is delusional enough to believe anything no matter how
ridiculous that aligns with his delusions.

Nothing delusional about my invention of the rail gun which updates conventional physics and busts e=mcc physics.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On 02-Oct-23 11:04 am, Arindam Banerjee wrote:

On Monday, 2 October 2023 at 10:19:52 UTC+11, Sylvia Else wrote:

On 02-Oct-23 8:41 am, Arindam Banerjee wrote:

Now this is really Divine, fixing those pompous fancypants atheistic-robotic e=mcc sorts as the most blithering imbeciles.

Are you really so naive as to believe a blantant fraud?

No, it is not a fraud. Those who believe in the law of conservation of energy are frauds.
Getting energy from magnets, or gravity, makes perfect sense, and is consistent with my new physics.
(Which is based upon busting inertia and that is proved with a new kind of electric motor that I have invented.)

Someone makes a video about a claimed over-unity machine, and the
possibilities are that a) it's a fraud, made for clicks, and b) it's
real, despite violating laws of physics that have stood the test of time.

And you select (b)??

Do you want to buy this bridge I have for sale?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Sydney_(AU),_Harbour_Bridge_--_2019_--_2179.jpg

Sylvia.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> wrote:

On 02-Oct-23 8:41 am, Arindam Banerjee wrote:

Now this is really Divine, fixing those pompous fancypants atheistic-robotic e=mcc sorts as the most blithering imbeciles.

Are you really so naive as to believe a blantant fraud?

Sylvia.

No, but he is delusional enough to believe anything no matter how
ridiculous that aligns with his delusions.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On 02-Oct-23 8:41 am, Arindam Banerjee wrote:

Now this is really Divine, fixing those pompous fancypants atheistic-robotic e=mcc sorts as the most blithering imbeciles.

Are you really so naive as to believe a blantant fraud?

Sylvia.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Monday, 2 October 2023 at 11:14:15 UTC+11, Sylvia Else wrote:

On 02-Oct-23 11:04 am, Arindam Banerjee wrote:

On Monday, 2 October 2023 at 10:19:52 UTC+11, Sylvia Else wrote:

On 02-Oct-23 8:41 am, Arindam Banerjee wrote:

Now this is really Divine, fixing those pompous fancypants atheistic-robotic e=mcc sorts as the most blithering imbeciles.

Are you really so naive as to believe a blantant fraud?

No, it is not a fraud. Those who believe in the law of conservation of energy are frauds.
Getting energy from magnets, or gravity, makes perfect sense, and is consistent with my new physics.
(Which is based upon busting inertia and that is proved with a new kind of electric motor that I have invented.)

Someone makes a video about a claimed over-unity machine,

What on earth is that?
The kids are making motors generate power using the forces of gravity or magnets. Quite ingeniously. Great!

and the
possibilities are that a) it's a fraud, made for clicks,

tch, tch, what low faith in the ingenuity of street kids!
Any street kid that smart is worth all the esteemed and ridiculous professers that loudly professed bullshits, lifelong, for their living.
And thus obstructed genuine progress.

and b) it's
real, despite violating laws of physics that have stood the test of time.

The laws of physics once had it that the Sun moved around the Earth.
The laws of physics, like all laws, change over time.

And you select (b)??

I *make* b, so yes. I violate the shonky laws or theories of physics, like the conservation of energy, the conservation of mass and energy, quantum theory, big bang theory...
AS they are so shonky, then can be violated with use of ingenuity, modern gadgets, etc.
We are not stuck in the days of da Vinci or Helmholtz.
Kids have motors, even old second hand ones. They have bicycle wheels, soda bottles, water, salt, some skill with welding...
and so down goes trillions worth of bullshit research with moneys milked from the stupid taxpayers.

Do you want to buy this bridge I have for sale?

No. I don't buy anything from frauds and fools.
They can keep their lies and follies to themselves, thanks.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Sydney_(AU),_Harbour_Bridge_--_2019_--_2179.jpg

Sylvia.

Lame.
Now needed are tons of rotten tomatoes for kids to throw at the esteemed and ridiculous liars in high places.
Globally.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote:

On Monday, 2 October 2023 at 11:14:15 UTC+11, Sylvia Else wrote:

On 02-Oct-23 11:04 am, Arindam Banerjee wrote:

On Monday, 2 October 2023 at 10:19:52 UTC+11, Sylvia Else wrote:

On 02-Oct-23 8:41 am, Arindam Banerjee wrote:

Now this is really Divine, fixing those pompous fancypants atheistic-robotic e=mcc sorts as the most blithering imbeciles.

Are you really so naive as to believe a blantant fraud?

No, it is not a fraud. Those who believe in the law of conservation of energy are frauds.
Getting energy from magnets, or gravity, makes perfect sense, and is consistent with my new physics.
(Which is based upon busting inertia and that is proved with a new kind of electric motor that I have invented.)

Someone makes a video about a claimed over-unity machine,

What on earth is that?
The kids are making motors generate power using the forces of gravity or magnets. Quite ingeniously. Great!

If they actually were, they would be billionaires in a matter of
days, crackpot.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote:

On Monday, 2 October 2023 at 10:46:10 UTC+11, Jim Pennino wrote:

Sylvia Else <syl...@email.invalid> wrote:

On 02-Oct-23 8:41 am, Arindam Banerjee wrote:

Now this is really Divine, fixing those pompous fancypants atheistic-robotic e=mcc sorts as the most blithering imbeciles.

Are you really so naive as to believe a blantant fraud?

Sylvia.

No, but he is delusional enough to believe anything no matter how
ridiculous that aligns with his delusions.

Nothing delusional about my invention of the rail gun which updates conventional physics and busts e=mcc physics.

Your delusion is that it works and violates known conventional theory, crackpot.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Monday, 2 October 2023 at 14:31:11 UTC+11, Jim Pennino wrote:

Arindam Banerjee <banerjee...@gmail.com> wrote:

On Monday, 2 October 2023 at 10:46:10 UTC+11, Jim Pennino wrote:

Sylvia Else <syl...@email.invalid> wrote:

On 02-Oct-23 8:41 am, Arindam Banerjee wrote:

Now this is really Divine, fixing those pompous fancypants atheistic-robotic e=mcc sorts as the most blithering imbeciles.

Are you really so naive as to believe a blantant fraud?

Sylvia.

No, but he is delusional enough to believe anything no matter how
ridiculous that aligns with his delusions.

Nothing delusional about my invention of the rail gun which updates conventional physics and busts e=mcc physics.

Your delusion is that it works and violates known conventional theory, crackpot.

Only deliberately blind frauds and fools can say it does not work.
That the force accelerating it has no reaction, violates classical physics, and totally outs the ridiculous e=mcc stuff.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Monday, 2 October 2023 at 14:31:12 UTC+11, Jim Pennino wrote:

Arindam Banerjee <banerjee...@gmail.com> wrote:

On Monday, 2 October 2023 at 11:14:15 UTC+11, Sylvia Else wrote:

On 02-Oct-23 11:04 am, Arindam Banerjee wrote:

On Monday, 2 October 2023 at 10:19:52 UTC+11, Sylvia Else wrote:

On 02-Oct-23 8:41 am, Arindam Banerjee wrote:

Now this is really Divine, fixing those pompous fancypants atheistic-robotic e=mcc sorts as the most blithering imbeciles.

Are you really so naive as to believe a blantant fraud?

No, it is not a fraud. Those who believe in the law of conservation of energy are frauds.
Getting energy from magnets, or gravity, makes perfect sense, and is consistent with my new physics.
(Which is based upon busting inertia and that is proved with a new kind of electric motor that I have invented.)

Someone makes a video about a claimed over-unity machine,

What on earth is that?
The kids are making motors generate power using the forces of gravity or magnets. Quite ingeniously. Great!

If they actually were, they would be billionaires in a matter of
days, crackpot.

Not so, fool.
Their invention cannot make much money. Not much power is generated.
Anyway money is not the issue here.
The issue is that they are generating power from the force of gravity, or magnets.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On 02-Oct-23 3:14 pm, Arindam Banerjee wrote:

On Monday, 2 October 2023 at 14:31:12 UTC+11, Jim Pennino wrote:

Arindam Banerjee <banerjee...@gmail.com> wrote:

On Monday, 2 October 2023 at 11:14:15 UTC+11, Sylvia Else wrote:

On 02-Oct-23 11:04 am, Arindam Banerjee wrote:

On Monday, 2 October 2023 at 10:19:52 UTC+11, Sylvia Else wrote:

On 02-Oct-23 8:41 am, Arindam Banerjee wrote:

Now this is really Divine, fixing those pompous fancypants atheistic-robotic e=mcc sorts as the most blithering imbeciles.

Are you really so naive as to believe a blantant fraud?

No, it is not a fraud. Those who believe in the law of conservation of energy are frauds.
Getting energy from magnets, or gravity, makes perfect sense, and is consistent with my new physics.
(Which is based upon busting inertia and that is proved with a new kind of electric motor that I have invented.)

Someone makes a video about a claimed over-unity machine,

What on earth is that?
The kids are making motors generate power using the forces of gravity or magnets. Quite ingeniously. Great!

If they actually were, they would be billionaires in a matter of
days, crackpot.

Not so, fool.
Their invention cannot make much money. Not much power is generated.

If it actually worked, the usual course would be to investigate the
underlying physics and seek ways to improve the performance. At the very
least we'd see demonstrations involving respected and impartial
observers, who would be permitted to examine the machines closely, such
that the accusation of fraud would not be so easily made.

In reality, none of these things ever gets past stage magic, the
difference being the professional magicians do not claim they can
actually do the impossible things.

Sylvia.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Monday, 2 October 2023 at 14:31:12 UTC+11, Jim Pennino wrote:

Arindam Banerjee <banerjee...@gmail.com> wrote:

On Monday, 2 October 2023 at 11:14:15 UTC+11, Sylvia Else wrote:

On 02-Oct-23 11:04 am, Arindam Banerjee wrote:

On Monday, 2 October 2023 at 10:19:52 UTC+11, Sylvia Else wrote:

On 02-Oct-23 8:41 am, Arindam Banerjee wrote:

Now this is really Divine, fixing those pompous fancypants atheistic-robotic e=mcc sorts as the most blithering imbeciles.

Are you really so naive as to believe a blantant fraud?

No, it is not a fraud. Those who believe in the law of conservation of energy are frauds.
Getting energy from magnets, or gravity, makes perfect sense, and is consistent with my new physics.
(Which is based upon busting inertia and that is proved with a new kind of electric motor that I have invented.)

Someone makes a video about a claimed over-unity machine,

What on earth is that?
The kids are making motors generate power using the forces of gravity or magnets. Quite ingeniously. Great!

If they actually were, they would be billionaires in a matter of
days, crackpot.

They would need to throw megatons of rotten stuff at the blind and biased, or very stupid, or simply corrupt nino/nanoPenis creatures, one should think. A revolution required!

Not necessary, though. Anyone can repeat the street kid's work. (And mine too, with a bit more expense.) And go for publicity.

I would say that millionaires if not billionaires would be made in another 2-10 years in this field, depends how fast street kids and richer sponsors do their stuff.

Let us see. If one properly designed Bhaskaracharya wheel (with lead and oil in aluminium tubes) on a recycled plastic wheel generates 1 Kw with 6 wheels on a one meter shaft,
then
1 KW is generated in a 1 cu m space. using 1 1 KW jmotor.
1 MW generated in a 1000 cu m space with 1000 1 Kw motor.
1 GW generated in a 1000000 cum space with a million 1 Kw motor.

Now one million cubic meters space is 1 km * 1 km
With paths in between say 1.5 km * 1.5 km.

All green energy, quite contained, no pollution, and like a major coal fire station.

Could be distributed, unlike a polluting coal plant

Seems to me that it could easily be done with 250 million dollars.
Say a round 1 billion dollars, with mark ups, etc. to keep the street kids and their sponsors happy.

Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Monday, 2 October 2023 at 15:23:21 UTC+11, Sylvia Else wrote:

On 02-Oct-23 3:14 pm, Arindam Banerjee wrote:

On Monday, 2 October 2023 at 14:31:12 UTC+11, Jim Pennino wrote:

Arindam Banerjee <banerjee...@gmail.com> wrote:

On Monday, 2 October 2023 at 11:14:15 UTC+11, Sylvia Else wrote:

On 02-Oct-23 11:04 am, Arindam Banerjee wrote:

On Monday, 2 October 2023 at 10:19:52 UTC+11, Sylvia Else wrote:

On 02-Oct-23 8:41 am, Arindam Banerjee wrote:

Now this is really Divine, fixing those pompous fancypants atheistic-robotic e=mcc sorts as the most blithering imbeciles.

Are you really so naive as to believe a blantant fraud?

No, it is not a fraud. Those who believe in the law of conservation of energy are frauds.
Getting energy from magnets, or gravity, makes perfect sense, and is consistent with my new physics.
(Which is based upon busting inertia and that is proved with a new kind of electric motor that I have invented.)

Someone makes a video about a claimed over-unity machine,

What on earth is that?
The kids are making motors generate power using the forces of gravity or magnets. Quite ingeniously. Great!

If they actually were, they would be billionaires in a matter of
days, crackpot.

Not so, fool.
Their invention cannot make much money. Not much power is generated.

If it actually worked, the usual course would be to investigate the underlying physics and seek ways to improve the performance. At the very least we'd see demonstrations involving respected and impartial
observers, who would be permitted to examine the machines closely, such
that the accusation of fraud would not be so easily made.

As I find there is no such animal as respected and impartial observers in the scientific world.
If there were, they would ask me to invite them to see my rail gun working. They are all shameless careerists, lying for their livings, corrupt to their cores.

In reality, none of these things ever gets past stage magic, the
difference being the professional magicians do not claim they can
actually do the impossible things.

Point is that it is not impossible. Anyone can repeat their work. And mine, too.
These are not magicians, these are kids who do what they can.
Nice to think, that a street kid can create extra energy after billions or trillions have been wasted on fusion research without getting an extra erg!
Who is the fraud? Who are the fools?
God laughs!

Sylvia.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On 10/2/2023 12:12 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:

On Monday, 2 October 2023 at 14:31:11 UTC+11, Jim Pennino wrote:

Arindam Banerjee <banerjee...@gmail.com> wrote:

Nothing delusional about my invention of the rail gun which updates conventional physics and busts e=mcc physics.

Your delusion is that it works and violates known conventional theory,
crackpot.

Only deliberately blind frauds and fools can say it does not work.
You never provided proper evidence that it does work.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Monday, 2 October 2023 at 16:59:51 UTC+11, Volney wrote:

On 10/2/2023 12:12 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:

On Monday, 2 October 2023 at 14:31:11 UTC+11, Jim Pennino wrote:

Arindam Banerjee <banerjee...@gmail.com> wrote:

Nothing delusional about my invention of the rail gun which updates conventional physics and busts e=mcc physics.

Your delusion is that it works and violates known conventional theory,
crackpot.

Only deliberately blind frauds and fools can say it does not work.
You never provided proper evidence that it does work.

Following my 2017 videos:
Latest experiments (2022) showing my invention of a new kind of rail gun https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zYtyOMbgiZ0

Which is improved upon in, and its potential for ejecting matter into near space , and horizontal tunneling shown in
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o6pjy0Wvujs&t=19s

and the following shows how a new class of linear motor violating inertia can be developed by arresting the momentum of the armature and imparting that to the whole system, giving it an increased velocity
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=idsIuzEajTc&t=2s

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On 10/2/2023 2:03 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:

On Monday, 2 October 2023 at 16:59:51 UTC+11, Volney wrote:

On 10/2/2023 12:12 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:

Only deliberately blind frauds and fools can say it does not work.

You never provided proper evidence that it does work.

Following my 2017 videos:

Which are insufficient evidence that it does work. As I told you.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Monday, 2 October 2023 at 17:20:27 UTC+11, Volney wrote:

On 10/2/2023 2:03 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:

On Monday, 2 October 2023 at 16:59:51 UTC+11, Volney wrote:

On 10/2/2023 12:12 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:

Only deliberately blind frauds and fools can say it does not work.

You never provided proper evidence that it does work.

Following my 2017 videos:

Which are insufficient evidence that it does work. As I told you.

You said I was pushing it with my hand.
What about my 2022 videos.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote:

On Monday, 2 October 2023 at 14:31:11 UTC+11, Jim Pennino wrote:

Arindam Banerjee <banerjee...@gmail.com> wrote:

On Monday, 2 October 2023 at 10:46:10 UTC+11, Jim Pennino wrote:

Sylvia Else <syl...@email.invalid> wrote:

On 02-Oct-23 8:41 am, Arindam Banerjee wrote:

Now this is really Divine, fixing those pompous fancypants atheistic-robotic e=mcc sorts as the most blithering imbeciles.

Are you really so naive as to believe a blantant fraud?

Sylvia.

No, but he is delusional enough to believe anything no matter how
ridiculous that aligns with his delusions.

Nothing delusional about my invention of the rail gun which updates conventional physics and busts e=mcc physics.

Your delusion is that it works and violates known conventional theory,
crackpot.

Only deliberately blind frauds and fools can say it does not work.

Only delusionally insane crackpots can say it does work, crackpot.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On 10/2/2023 6:05 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:

On Monday, 2 October 2023 at 17:20:27 UTC+11, Volney wrote:

On 10/2/2023 2:03 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:

On Monday, 2 October 2023 at 16:59:51 UTC+11, Volney wrote:

On 10/2/2023 12:12 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:

Only deliberately blind frauds and fools can say it does not work.

You never provided proper evidence that it does work.

Following my 2017 videos:

Which are insufficient evidence that it does work. As I told you.

You said I was pushing it with my hand.
What about my 2022 videos.

You still don't show any numbers, figures of energy in, velocity at the
start vs. velocity at the end, momentum at start/end etc. etc. All you
have is "Trust me, bro."

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Tuesday, 3 October 2023 at 00:16:11 UTC+11, Jim Pennino wrote:

Arindam Banerjee <banerjee...@gmail.com> wrote:

On Monday, 2 October 2023 at 14:31:11 UTC+11, Jim Pennino wrote:

Arindam Banerjee <banerjee...@gmail.com> wrote:

On Monday, 2 October 2023 at 10:46:10 UTC+11, Jim Pennino wrote:

Sylvia Else <syl...@email.invalid> wrote:

On 02-Oct-23 8:41 am, Arindam Banerjee wrote:

Now this is really Divine, fixing those pompous fancypants atheistic-robotic e=mcc sorts as the most blithering imbeciles.

Are you really so naive as to believe a blantant fraud?

Sylvia.

No, but he is delusional enough to believe anything no matter how
ridiculous that aligns with his delusions.

Nothing delusional about my invention of the rail gun which updates conventional physics and busts e=mcc physics.

Your delusion is that it works and violates known conventional theory,
crackpot.

Only deliberately blind frauds and fools can say it does not work.

Only delusionally insane crackpots can say it does work, crackpot.

Lame. :-)
tch tch, ad hominem is all these pseudoscientific e=mcc chanting frauds have got left when scientifically upset;
apart from the trillions of dollars and the gigatons of publicity, respectively, from and for the billions of supportive fools.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Tuesday, 3 October 2023 at 02:29:55 UTC+11, Volney wrote:

On 10/2/2023 6:05 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:

On Monday, 2 October 2023 at 17:20:27 UTC+11, Volney wrote:

On 10/2/2023 2:03 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:

On Monday, 2 October 2023 at 16:59:51 UTC+11, Volney wrote:

On 10/2/2023 12:12 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:

Only deliberately blind frauds and fools can say it does not work.

You never provided proper evidence that it does work.

Following my 2017 videos:

Which are insufficient evidence that it does work. As I told you.

You said I was pushing it with my hand.
What about my 2022 videos.

You still don't show any numbers, figures of energy in, velocity at the
start vs. velocity at the end, momentum at start/end etc. etc. All you
have is "Trust me, bro."

Not really.
Anyone could have found that out from my latest video on facebook.
Well, to be fair, they would not know the mass of the armature used, or the mass of the gun with capacitors.
(But they could put up some estimate, or at least asked some questions about the masses involved.)
So...
I have got your point and my latest facebook post will contain the necessary video, raw data, and the graphs to show how the centre of gravity has moved 19cm.
(Just got that value now, Moroney.)
How much momentum was created before friction stopped the movement that would have continued indefinitely without friction.
And the energy created too, all from THE INTERNAL FORCE from the capacitor bank within the closed geometry of the apparatus.
The graphs look nice. Should convince any honest soul.
Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On 10/2/2023 6:51 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:

On Tuesday, 3 October 2023 at 02:29:55 UTC+11, Volney wrote:

On 10/2/2023 6:05 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:

On Monday, 2 October 2023 at 17:20:27 UTC+11, Volney wrote:

On 10/2/2023 2:03 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:

On Monday, 2 October 2023 at 16:59:51 UTC+11, Volney wrote:

On 10/2/2023 12:12 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:

Only deliberately blind frauds and fools can say it does not work.

You never provided proper evidence that it does work.

Following my 2017 videos:

Which are insufficient evidence that it does work. As I told you.

You said I was pushing it with my hand.
What about my 2022 videos.

You still don't show any numbers, figures of energy in, velocity at the
start vs. velocity at the end, momentum at start/end etc. etc. All you
have is "Trust me, bro."

Not really.

Yes, really. You don't supply the numbers necessary for a real proof.
Where are your measurements of the speed before and after the current
applied? Where are your measurements of the current over the time it was applied? Where are your measurements of the momentum, "showing" how it's
not conserved? Where...

Anyone could have found that out from my latest video on facebook.

I see. You want to make your viewers do your work for you somehow, from evidence-lacking facebook posts!

Well, to be fair, they would not know the mass of the armature used, or the mass of the gun with capacitors.

Exactly. You provide incomplete data.

(But they could put up some estimate, or at least asked some questions about the masses involved.)
So...

So you want to make them do your work for you. Or buh-LIEEEEVE!!! your
"Trust me, bro!"

I have got your point and my latest facebook post will contain the necessary video, raw data, and the graphs to show how the centre of gravity has moved 19cm.
(Just got that value now, Moroney.)
How much momentum was created before friction stopped the movement that would have continued indefinitely without friction.
And the energy created too, all from THE INTERNAL FORCE from the capacitor bank within the closed geometry of the apparatus.
The graphs look nice. Should convince any honest soul.

That's a start.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Tuesday, 3 October 2023 at 15:29:41 UTC+11, Volney wrote:

On 10/2/2023 6:51 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:

On Tuesday, 3 October 2023 at 02:29:55 UTC+11, Volney wrote:

On 10/2/2023 6:05 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:

On Monday, 2 October 2023 at 17:20:27 UTC+11, Volney wrote:

On 10/2/2023 2:03 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:

On Monday, 2 October 2023 at 16:59:51 UTC+11, Volney wrote:

On 10/2/2023 12:12 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:

Only deliberately blind frauds and fools can say it does not work. >>>>

You never provided proper evidence that it does work.

Following my 2017 videos:

Which are insufficient evidence that it does work. As I told you.

You said I was pushing it with my hand.
What about my 2022 videos.

You still don't show any numbers, figures of energy in, velocity at the
start vs. velocity at the end, momentum at start/end etc. etc. All you
have is "Trust me, bro."

Not really.

Yes, really. You don't supply the numbers necessary for a real proof.
Where are your measurements of the speed before and after the current applied? Where are your measurements of the current over the time it was applied? Where are your measurements of the momentum, "showing" how it's
not conserved? Where...

Anyone could have found that out from my latest video on facebook.

I see. You want to make your viewers do your work for you somehow, from evidence-lacking facebook posts!

I provide evidence, liar.
Evidence was that the centre of gravity moves with internal force.
Anyone can see that evidence unless they are very stupid liars.

Well, to be fair, they would not know the mass of the armature used, or the mass of the gun with capacitors.

Exactly. You provide incomplete data.

No you liar, my 2017 and 2022 videos provided all the necessary information within them.
Those not lazy nor stupid nor mendacious can find them.
In this 2023 facebook video the idea was to show how well the rail gun works, quite flashy, and then as a motor moves the centre of gravity, violating inertia.
https://www.facebook.com/arindam.banerjee.31149359/videos/690084565977593
Thus revising Newton's laws, as I had predicted in my book "To the Stars!" back in 1999 (presented in Jan 2000 in my adda website, got a fair bit of attention then and more after there was a global news release item in 2003.
That cost me dearly, got me hounded out of employment.
Ah well.
Sacrifices have to be made for truth, what.

(But they could put up some estimate, or at least asked some questions about the masses involved.)
So...

So you want to make them do your work for you. Or buh-LIEEEEVE!!! your
"Trust me, bro!"'

Liars like you are beyond hope, but no worries, very many are like you, but hopefully not all are like you.
There will be billions and trillions (over the centuries) who will not just believe me, but gain immensely from my seminal work.
Just as Galileo with his telescope shattered the crystal spheres and made the Earth go around the Sun, this experiment of mine sets the infinite Universe straight (not warped up as per e=mcc).
It also transforms the great-great modern physicists into blithering imbeciles, pompous asses, learned goats, etc.

I have got your point and my latest facebook post will contain the necessary video, raw data, and the graphs to show how the centre of gravity has moved 19cm.
(Just got that value now, Moroney.)
How much momentum was created before friction stopped the movement that would have continued indefinitely without friction.
And the energy created too, all from THE INTERNAL FORCE from the capacitor bank within the closed geometry of the apparatus.
The graphs look nice. Should convince any honest soul.

That's a start.

Indeed.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)