On Saturday, September 16, 2023 at 10:05:29 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
GPT goal is to replace all Physicsts...and it's own programmers of
course.
Let your GPT do all your thinking for yous. (most of yous have already have...)
artificial intelligence talking to artificial intelligence.
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.
All of them?
That's funny I don't even need any physicist but myself,
and all I do is quote other physicists.
I don't need GPT, that's what physicists are for.
Of course if it helps me when someone says
"what is your opinion as a physicist",
helps "I can explain to Chat why what I say is so",
also "it's the opinion of physicists".
Yeah, all I do is quote other physicists and me.
So, I wrote a very long quote.
So, "Quoting GPT", is for GPT's dialectic: it's
the didactic dialectic, laid out down, very "conservative",
what quotes I see of GPT, there are others.
So, "AI", any report or data, makes for that "making a report"
and "running on the cloud on a large language model", are
"two different things", thusly, I expect to reflect on its relation.
A "concept diagram" and "phrasing", "natural language understanding",
"AI" as mechanized thinkers and reply makers wonders up a rule,
All the "AI" can do like any other physicist is construct narratives
of physicists, which in a language of physicists, is only quotes
from physicists.
It's called "academic" including "responsible".
So, short, formulaic papers, have that, papers as usually include
the exposition, arriving not just "ask me more..." instead
"and so it goes...", making "it's called bibliography" and
"sources" not "the source".
On Sunday, September 17, 2023 at 2:00:09 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
Ross Finlayson wrote:
On Saturday, September 16, 2023 at 10:05:29 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
GPT goal is to replace all Physicsts...and it's own programmers of course.
Let your GPT do all your thinking for yous. (most of yous have already have...)
artificial intelligence talking to artificial intelligence.
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
All of them?
That's funny I don't even need any physicist but myself,
and all I do is quote other physicists.
I don't need GPT, that's what physicists are for.
Of course if it helps me when someone says
"what is your opinion as a physicist",
helps "I can explain to Chat why what I say is so",
also "it's the opinion of physicists".
Yeah, all I do is quote other physicists and me.
So, I wrote a very long quote.
So, "Quoting GPT", is for GPT's dialectic: it's
the didactic dialectic, laid out down, very "conservative",
what quotes I see of GPT, there are others.
So, "AI", any report or data, makes for that "making a report"
and "running on the cloud on a large language model", are
"two different things", thusly, I expect to reflect on its relation.
A "concept diagram" and "phrasing", "natural language understanding", "AI" as mechanized thinkers and reply makers wonders up a rule,
All the "AI" can do like any other physicist is construct narratives
of physicists, which in a language of physicists, is only quotes
from physicists.
It's called "academic" including "responsible".
You can see Ross's hands on his videos and hear his voice. And see his desktop on which sits an item purchased from the Yee Olde Curiosity Shoppe. Rir. Ross is real.So, short, formulaic papers, have that, papers as usually includeHow can I tell you're not just some form of artifical intelligence who
the exposition, arriving not just "ask me more..." instead
"and so it goes...", making "it's called bibliography" and
"sources" not "the source".
call itself...Ross Finlayson????
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.
Real? Are you sure Ross is not inside some computer?How can I tell you're not just some form of artifical intelligence whoYou can see Ross's hands on his videos and hear his voice. And see his desktop on which sits an item purchased from the Yee Olde Curiosity Shoppe. Rir. Ross is real.
call itself...Ross Finlayson????
From where I'm standing...You are in a computer!
GPT goal is to replace all Physicsts...and it's own programmers ofThere are no physicists in any institution, only careerists
course.
Let your GPT do all your thinking for yous. (most of yous have already have...)
artificial intelligence talking to artificial intelligence.
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.
On 9/17/2023 11:40 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
Real? Are you sure Ross is not inside some computer?How can I tell you're not just some form of artifical intelligence who >>> call itself...Ross Finlayson????You can see Ross's hands on his videos and hear his voice. And see his desktop on which sits an item purchased from the Yee Olde Curiosity Shoppe. Rir. Ross is real.
From where I'm standing...You are in a computer!
Via usenet you can probably access a couple of has beens at the most.
The rest are almost all fully incapacitated. Lobotomized ex-"Engineers"
at best.
But why "almost"?
Because, those who are still somebody, have to wait for their coffee
brew, or have to wait for their large intestines to kick in for a good
dump. And that's how you meet them here.
--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com
On Sunday, September 17, 2023 at 2:00:09?PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
Ross Finlayson wrote:You can see Ross's hands on his videos and hear his voice. And see his desktop on which sits an item purchased from the Yee Olde Curiosity Shoppe. Rir. Ross is real.
How can I tell you're not just some form of artifical intelligence who
On Saturday, September 16, 2023 at 10:05:29?PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote: >> > > GPT goal is to replace all Physicsts...and it's own programmers of
course.
Let your GPT do all your thinking for yous. (most of yous have already >> > > have...)
artificial intelligence talking to artificial intelligence.
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, >> > > and challenge the unchallengeable.
All of them?
That's funny I don't even need any physicist but myself,
and all I do is quote other physicists.
I don't need GPT, that's what physicists are for.
Of course if it helps me when someone says
"what is your opinion as a physicist",
helps "I can explain to Chat why what I say is so",
also "it's the opinion of physicists".
Yeah, all I do is quote other physicists and me.
So, I wrote a very long quote.
So, "Quoting GPT", is for GPT's dialectic: it's
the didactic dialectic, laid out down, very "conservative",
what quotes I see of GPT, there are others.
So, "AI", any report or data, makes for that "making a report"
and "running on the cloud on a large language model", are
"two different things", thusly, I expect to reflect on its relation.
A "concept diagram" and "phrasing", "natural language understanding",
"AI" as mechanized thinkers and reply makers wonders up a rule,
All the "AI" can do like any other physicist is construct narratives
of physicists, which in a language of physicists, is only quotes
from physicists.
It's called "academic" including "responsible".
So, short, formulaic papers, have that, papers as usually include
the exposition, arriving not just "ask me more..." instead
"and so it goes...", making "it's called bibliography" and
"sources" not "the source".
call itself...Ross Finlayson????
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.
https://support.avast.com/en-us/article/antivirus-email-signature/#
On Sun, 17 Sep 2023 15:07:04 -0700 (PDT), patdolan
<patdolan@comcast.net> wrote:
On Sunday, September 17, 2023 at 2:00:09?PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
Ross Finlayson wrote:You can see Ross's hands on his videos and hear his voice. And see his desktop on which sits an item purchased from the Yee Olde Curiosity Shoppe. Rir. Ross is real.
How can I tell you're not just some form of artifical intelligence who
On Saturday, September 16, 2023 at 10:05:29?PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
GPT goal is to replace all Physicsts...and it's own programmers of
course.
Let your GPT do all your thinking for yous. (most of yous have already >>> > > have...)
artificial intelligence talking to artificial intelligence.
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, >>> > > and challenge the unchallengeable.
All of them?
That's funny I don't even need any physicist but myself,
and all I do is quote other physicists.
I don't need GPT, that's what physicists are for.
Of course if it helps me when someone says
"what is your opinion as a physicist",
helps "I can explain to Chat why what I say is so",
also "it's the opinion of physicists".
Yeah, all I do is quote other physicists and me.
So, I wrote a very long quote.
So, "Quoting GPT", is for GPT's dialectic: it's
the didactic dialectic, laid out down, very "conservative",
what quotes I see of GPT, there are others.
So, "AI", any report or data, makes for that "making a report"
and "running on the cloud on a large language model", are
"two different things", thusly, I expect to reflect on its relation.
A "concept diagram" and "phrasing", "natural language understanding",
"AI" as mechanized thinkers and reply makers wonders up a rule,
All the "AI" can do like any other physicist is construct narratives
of physicists, which in a language of physicists, is only quotes
from physicists.
It's called "academic" including "responsible".
So, short, formulaic papers, have that, papers as usually include
the exposition, arriving not just "ask me more..." instead
"and so it goes...", making "it's called bibliography" and
"sources" not "the source".
call itself...Ross Finlayson????
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.
a video in a computer is a video in a computer...still.
As far as you know Ross can be a inside a computer...
it's computers all the way down!
Ross is a ...simulation.
Can you not tell by his writing style????
he's a gpt.
GPT goal is to replace all Physicsts...and it's own programmers of
course.
Let your GPT do all your thinking for yous. (most of yous have already have...)
artificial intelligence talking to artificial intelligence.
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.
On Wed, 20 Sep 2023 17:39:44 -0700, The Starmaker
<starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
On Sun, 17 Sep 2023 15:07:04 -0700 (PDT), patdolan
<patdolan@comcast.net> wrote:
On Sunday, September 17, 2023 at 2:00:09?PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
Ross Finlayson wrote:You can see Ross's hands on his videos and hear his voice. And see his desktop on which sits an item purchased from the Yee Olde Curiosity Shoppe. Rir. Ross is real.
How can I tell you're not just some form of artifical intelligence who >>> call itself...Ross Finlayson????
On Saturday, September 16, 2023 at 10:05:29?PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
GPT goal is to replace all Physicsts...and it's own programmers of >>> > > course.
Let your GPT do all your thinking for yous. (most of yous have already
have...)
artificial intelligence talking to artificial intelligence.
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, >>> > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.
All of them?
That's funny I don't even need any physicist but myself,
and all I do is quote other physicists.
I don't need GPT, that's what physicists are for.
Of course if it helps me when someone says
"what is your opinion as a physicist",
helps "I can explain to Chat why what I say is so",
also "it's the opinion of physicists".
Yeah, all I do is quote other physicists and me.
So, I wrote a very long quote.
So, "Quoting GPT", is for GPT's dialectic: it's
the didactic dialectic, laid out down, very "conservative",
what quotes I see of GPT, there are others.
So, "AI", any report or data, makes for that "making a report"
and "running on the cloud on a large language model", are
"two different things", thusly, I expect to reflect on its relation. >>> >
A "concept diagram" and "phrasing", "natural language understanding", >>> > "AI" as mechanized thinkers and reply makers wonders up a rule,
All the "AI" can do like any other physicist is construct narratives >>> > of physicists, which in a language of physicists, is only quotes
from physicists.
It's called "academic" including "responsible".
So, short, formulaic papers, have that, papers as usually include
the exposition, arriving not just "ask me more..." instead
"and so it goes...", making "it's called bibliography" and
"sources" not "the source".
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, >>> and challenge the unchallengeable.
a video in a computer is a video in a computer...still.
As far as you know Ross can be a inside a computer...
it's computers all the way down!
Ross is a ...simulation.
Can you not tell by his writing style????
he's a gpt.
In other words, Ross Finlayson is an implant.
Implanted in a universe
(simulated universe)
inside a computer while
patdolan watches
Ross's hands on his videos and
hear his voice
and patnolan
sez: Ross is real.
Ross is in a real computer.
and still a...artificial intelligence.
it's computers all the way down...
down to the last simulated universe computer.
Only one universe.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 407 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 11:36:41 |
| Calls: | 8,554 |
| Calls today: | 6 |
| Files: | 13,219 |
| Messages: | 5,925,362 |