On 25-Aug-23 1:15 pm, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote:
By being indoctrinated in an ideology.
Why can't they defend that with reason?
Because they weren't persuaded by reason.
Do you ever wonder how a theory proposed by a patent clerk in his
twenties came to be accepted by the vast majority of physicists? Even if
it were true now that he is a supreme scientific figure whom no one can contradict (spoiler alert, it's not), it wouldn't have been the case then.
Sylvia.
Sylvia Else wrote:
On 25-Aug-23 1:15 pm, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote:
By being indoctrinated in an ideology.
Why can't they defend that with reason?
Because they weren't persuaded by reason.
Do you ever wonder how a theory proposed by a patent clerk in his
twenties came to be accepted by the vast majority of physicists? Even if it were true now that he is a supreme scientific figure whom no one can contradict (spoiler alert, it's not), it wouldn't have been the case then.
Sylvia.
"the vast majority of physicists" are lemmings and cranks and cooks.
"the vast majority of physicists" are too stupid to contradict what they don't understand!
"the vast majority of physicists" didn't and don't understand a theory proposed by a patent clerk in his
twenties.
Keep in mind that a theory proposed by a patent clerk in his
twenties didn't even mentioned Gravity once.
a theory proposed by a patent clerk in his
twenties didn't know what gravity was!
a theory proposed by a patent clerk in his
twenties wasn't even good at math.
Wasn't good at math.
Wasn't good at Gravity.
He's good at building bombs!
"Perhaps it will prove possible to test this theory using bodies whose energy content is variable to a high degree (e.g., salts of radium). -- Albert Einstein (1905)
"...new radium-like elements would be generated. Now it appears
almost certain that this could be achieved in the immediate future.
This new phenomenon would also lead to the construction of bombs,
and it is conceivable - though much less certain - that extremely power-
ful bombs of a new type may thus be constructed. A single bomb of this
type, carried by boat and exploded in a port, might very well destroy
the whole port together with some of the surrounding territory. However,
such bombs might very well prove to be too heavy for transportation by
air." -Albert Einstein
Albert Einstein wrote:
"According to these discussions and a remark you made yourself when
you were visiting me
it seems to be desirable to have a device which automatically brings
to explosion
a torpedo passing below a ship at the right moment.
I have an idea for an electro-magnetic device for this purpose which I
would like to submit to you for your judgement.
S is an electro-magnet producing an alternating magnetic field with
vertical axis. s and s' are two coils with vertical axis connected in
serie with opposite magnetic axis, which are located symmetrically to
S.
The current created by induction in those two coils may be multiplied
by tubes (current i). The device is set in function only at a moment
when
the torpedo is far enough from the emitting ship to avoid the magnetic influence of the latter. As long as the torpedo is on the way i will
vanish for reasons of symmetry. The torpedo is supposed to travel deep enough so that it will not hit the target directly but pass below it.
When the torpedo approaches the target there will be created through
the
nearby parts of the ship's hull an additional (induced) alternative
magnetic field which at first will be stronger in s than in s'. There
is
now created a current i the intensity of which will change according
to
the following diagrams L ' U PV... M corresponds to the moment when
the torpedo passes under the middle of the ship. At this moment i will
again vanish for reasons of symmetry. This is the moment to put the explosion into action. It will be easy to construct an electrical
contact device which functions if a current is first initiated and
goes
again to zero afterwards. " -Albert Einstein
Now, here is a question I have.
"Einstein was thinking about the prob-
lem for about ten minutes, and finally
chose momentum and gave the reasons" -Lt. Stephen Brunauer, head of the High Explosives Division
Lt. Stephen Brunauer, head of the High Explosives Division presented his problem to Albert Einstein.
Question: How did Albert Einstein answered the question in ten minutes????
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.
On 25-Aug-23 1:15 pm, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote:
By being indoctrinated in an ideology.
Why can't they defend that with reason?
Because they weren't persuaded by reason.
Sylvia Else wrote:
On 25-Aug-23 1:15 pm, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote:
By being indoctrinated in an ideology.
Why can't they defend that with reason?
Because they weren't persuaded by reason.
Do you ever wonder how a theory proposed by a patent clerk in his
twenties came to be accepted by the vast majority of physicists? Even if
it were true now that he is a supreme scientific figure whom no one can contradict (spoiler alert, it's not), it wouldn't have been the case then.
Sylvia.
"the vast majority of physicists" are lemmings and cranks and cooks.
"the vast majority of physicists" are too stupid to contradict what they don't understand!
"the vast majority of physicists" didn't and don't understand a theory proposed by a patent clerk in his
twenties.
Keep in mind that a theory proposed by a patent clerk in his
twenties didn't even mentioned Gravity once.
a theory proposed by a patent clerk in his
twenties didn't know what gravity was!
a theory proposed by a patent clerk in his
twenties wasn't even good at math.
Wasn't good at math.
Wasn't good at Gravity.
He's good at building bombs!
"Perhaps it will prove possible to test this theory using bodies whose energy content is variable to a high degree (e.g., salts of radium). -- Albert Einstein (1905)
"...new radium-like elements would be generated. Now it appears
almost certain that this could be achieved in the immediate future.
This new phenomenon would also lead to the construction of bombs,
and it is conceivable - though much less certain - that extremely power-
ful bombs of a new type may thus be constructed. A single bomb of this
type, carried by boat and exploded in a port, might very well destroy
the whole port together with some of the surrounding territory. However,
such bombs might very well prove to be too heavy for transportation by
air." -Albert Einstein
The Starmaker wrote:
Sylvia Else wrote:
On 25-Aug-23 1:15 pm, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote:
By being indoctrinated in an ideology.
Why can't they defend that with reason?
Because they weren't persuaded by reason.
Do you ever wonder how a theory proposed by a patent clerk in his twenties came to be accepted by the vast majority of physicists? Even if it were true now that he is a supreme scientific figure whom no one can contradict (spoiler alert, it's not), it wouldn't have been the case then.
Sylvia.
"the vast majority of physicists" are lemmings and cranks and cooks.
"the vast majority of physicists" are too stupid to contradict what they don't understand!
"the vast majority of physicists" didn't and don't understand a theory proposed by a patent clerk in his
twenties.
Keep in mind that a theory proposed by a patent clerk in his
twenties didn't even mentioned Gravity once.
a theory proposed by a patent clerk in his
twenties didn't know what gravity was!
a theory proposed by a patent clerk in his
twenties wasn't even good at math.
Wasn't good at math.
Wasn't good at Gravity.
He's good at building bombs!
"Perhaps it will prove possible to test this theory using bodies whose energy content is variable to a high degree (e.g., salts of radium). -- Albert Einstein (1905)
"...new radium-like elements would be generated. Now it appears
almost certain that this could be achieved in the immediate future.
This new phenomenon would also lead to the construction of bombs,
and it is conceivable - though much less certain - that extremely power-
ful bombs of a new type may thus be constructed. A single bomb of this
type, carried by boat and exploded in a port, might very well destroy
the whole port together with some of the surrounding territory. However,
such bombs might very well prove to be too heavy for transportation by
air." -Albert EinsteinWhat the 'scientific community' doesn't understand is that since 1905 Albert Einstein made a beeline
to building an atomic bomb. That was his baby. That was His experiment..."prove possible - to test this theory" of his.
It had noting about killing Germans. It simply was just an ...experiment. ("to test this theory")
By 1939..in order to "test this theory", he needed money to buy more uranium, so he conned the USA government by telling them
'If you don't give me the fuckin money you are all going to die!'
"...b) to speed up the experimental work, which is at present being car-
ried on within the limits of the budgets of University laboratories, by
providing funds, ..."
In order words, Albert Einstein (a government unto himself) was selling 'protection'.
to speed up the experimental work
which is at present
being carried on within the limits
of the budgets of University laboratories
So, he wouldn't have taken TEN YEARS to finish General Relativity if he wasn't
soooo preoccupied "to test this theory".
Here is his blueprint to build an atomic bomb
Albert Einstein's letters to President Franklin Delano Roosevelt https://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein/#first
OPM
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.
The Starmaker wrote:
Sylvia Else wrote:
On 25-Aug-23 1:15 pm, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote:
By being indoctrinated in an ideology.
Why can't they defend that with reason?
Because they weren't persuaded by reason.
Do you ever wonder how a theory proposed by a patent clerk in his twenties came to be accepted by the vast majority of physicists? Even if it were true now that he is a supreme scientific figure whom no one can contradict (spoiler alert, it's not), it wouldn't have been the case then.
Sylvia.
"the vast majority of physicists" are lemmings and cranks and cooks.
"the vast majority of physicists" are too stupid to contradict what they don't understand!
"the vast majority of physicists" didn't and don't understand a theory proposed by a patent clerk in his
twenties.
Keep in mind that a theory proposed by a patent clerk in his
twenties didn't even mentioned Gravity once.
a theory proposed by a patent clerk in his
twenties didn't know what gravity was!
a theory proposed by a patent clerk in his
twenties wasn't even good at math.
Wasn't good at math.
Wasn't good at Gravity.
He's good at building bombs!
"Perhaps it will prove possible to test this theory using bodies whose energy content is variable to a high degree (e.g., salts of radium). -- Albert Einstein (1905)
"...new radium-like elements would be generated. Now it appears
almost certain that this could be achieved in the immediate future.
This new phenomenon would also lead to the construction of bombs,
and it is conceivable - though much less certain - that extremely power-
ful bombs of a new type may thus be constructed. A single bomb of this
type, carried by boat and exploded in a port, might very well destroy
the whole port together with some of the surrounding territory. However,
such bombs might very well prove to be too heavy for transportation by
air." -Albert Einstein
What the 'scientific community' doesn't understand is that since 1905 Albert Einstein made a beeline
to building an atomic bomb. That was his baby. That was His experiment..."prove possible - to test this theory" of his.
It had noting about killing Germans. It simply was just an ...experiment. ("to test this theory")
By 1939..in order to "test this theory", he needed money to buy more uranium, so he conned the USA government by telling them
'If you don't give me the fuckin money you are all going to die!'
"...b) to speed up the experimental work, which is at present being car-
ried on within the limits of the budgets of University laboratories, by
providing funds, ..."
In order words, Albert Einstein (a government unto himself) was selling 'protection'.
to speed up the experimental work
which is at present
being carried on within the limits
of the budgets of University laboratories
So, he wouldn't have taken TEN YEARS to finish General Relativity if he wasn't
soooo preoccupied "to test this theory".
Here is his blueprint to build an atomic bomb
Albert Einstein's letters to President Franklin Delano Roosevelt https://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein/#first
OPM (other people's money)
The Starmaker wrote:
The Starmaker wrote:
Sylvia Else wrote:
On 25-Aug-23 1:15 pm, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote:
By being indoctrinated in an ideology.
Why can't they defend that with reason?
Because they weren't persuaded by reason.
Do you ever wonder how a theory proposed by a patent clerk in his twenties came to be accepted by the vast majority of physicists? Even if
it were true now that he is a supreme scientific figure whom no one can contradict (spoiler alert, it's not), it wouldn't have been the case then.
Sylvia.
"the vast majority of physicists" are lemmings and cranks and cooks.
"the vast majority of physicists" are too stupid to contradict what they don't understand!
"the vast majority of physicists" didn't and don't understand a theory proposed by a patent clerk in his
twenties.
Keep in mind that a theory proposed by a patent clerk in his
twenties didn't even mentioned Gravity once.
a theory proposed by a patent clerk in his
twenties didn't know what gravity was!
a theory proposed by a patent clerk in his
twenties wasn't even good at math.
Wasn't good at math.
Wasn't good at Gravity.
He's good at building bombs!
"Perhaps it will prove possible to test this theory using bodies whose energy content is variable to a high degree (e.g., salts of radium). -- Albert Einstein (1905)
"...new radium-like elements would be generated. Now it appears
almost certain that this could be achieved in the immediate future.
This new phenomenon would also lead to the construction of bombs,
and it is conceivable - though much less certain - that extremely power-
ful bombs of a new type may thus be constructed. A single bomb of this
type, carried by boat and exploded in a port, might very well destroy
the whole port together with some of the surrounding territory. However,
such bombs might very well prove to be too heavy for transportation by
air." -Albert Einstein
What the 'scientific community' doesn't understand is that since 1905 Albert Einstein made a beeline
to building an atomic bomb. That was his baby. That was His experiment..."prove possible - to test this theory" of his.
It had noting about killing Germans. It simply was just an ...experiment. ("to test this theory")
By 1939..in order to "test this theory", he needed money to buy more uranium, so he conned the USA government by telling them
'If you don't give me the fuckin money you are all going to die!'
"...b) to speed up the experimental work, which is at present being car-
ried on within the limits of the budgets of University laboratories, by
providing funds, ..."
In order words, Albert Einstein (a government unto himself) was selling 'protection'.
to speed up the experimental work
which is at present
being carried on within the limits
of the budgets of University laboratories
So, he wouldn't have taken TEN YEARS to finish General Relativity if he wasn't
soooo preoccupied "to test this theory".
Here is his blueprint to build an atomic bomb
Albert Einstein's letters to President Franklin Delano Roosevelt https://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein/#first
OPM (other people's money)
"It reflects his curiosity and anticipation of future experiments at universities that could provide empirical evidence to support his groundbreaking ideas."
..
"By using substances like radium salts with variable energy content, Einstein envisioned experiments that could potentially demonstrate the
conversion of mass into energy and validate his theory.
However, it's important to note that while his proposal was conceptually sound, the exact experimental implementation and verification may
have required further advancements in technology and experimental techniques.
It reflects his curiosity and anticipation of future experiments at universities that could provide empirical evidence to support his groundbreaking ideas."
The Starmaker wrote:
The Starmaker wrote:
The Starmaker wrote:
Sylvia Else wrote:
On 25-Aug-23 1:15 pm, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote:
By being indoctrinated in an ideology.
Why can't they defend that with reason?
Because they weren't persuaded by reason.
Do you ever wonder how a theory proposed by a patent clerk in his twenties came to be accepted by the vast majority of physicists? Even if
it were true now that he is a supreme scientific figure whom no one can
contradict (spoiler alert, it's not), it wouldn't have been the case then.
Sylvia.
"the vast majority of physicists" are lemmings and cranks and cooks. "the vast majority of physicists" are too stupid to contradict what they don't understand!
"the vast majority of physicists" didn't and don't understand a theory proposed by a patent clerk in his
twenties.
Keep in mind that a theory proposed by a patent clerk in his
twenties didn't even mentioned Gravity once.
a theory proposed by a patent clerk in his
twenties didn't know what gravity was!
a theory proposed by a patent clerk in his
twenties wasn't even good at math.
Wasn't good at math.
Wasn't good at Gravity.
He's good at building bombs!
"Perhaps it will prove possible to test this theory using bodies whose energy content is variable to a high degree (e.g., salts of radium). -- Albert Einstein (1905)
"...new radium-like elements would be generated. Now it appears
almost certain that this could be achieved in the immediate future.
This new phenomenon would also lead to the construction of bombs,
and it is conceivable - though much less certain - that extremely power-
ful bombs of a new type may thus be constructed. A single bomb of this
type, carried by boat and exploded in a port, might very well destroy
the whole port together with some of the surrounding territory. However,
such bombs might very well prove to be too heavy for transportation by
air." -Albert Einstein
What the 'scientific community' doesn't understand is that since 1905 Albert Einstein made a beeline
to building an atomic bomb. That was his baby. That was His experiment..."prove possible - to test this theory" of his.
It had noting about killing Germans. It simply was just an ...experiment. ("to test this theory")
By 1939..in order to "test this theory", he needed money to buy more uranium, so he conned the USA government by telling them
'If you don't give me the fuckin money you are all going to die!'
"...b) to speed up the experimental work, which is at present being car-
ried on within the limits of the budgets of University laboratories, by
providing funds, ..."
In order words, Albert Einstein (a government unto himself) was selling 'protection'.
to speed up the experimental work
which is at present
being carried on within the limits
of the budgets of University laboratories
So, he wouldn't have taken TEN YEARS to finish General Relativity if he wasn't
soooo preoccupied "to test this theory".
Here is his blueprint to build an atomic bomb
Albert Einstein's letters to President Franklin Delano Roosevelt https://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein/#first
OPM (other people's money)
"It reflects his curiosity and anticipation of future experiments at universities that could provide empirical evidence to support his groundbreaking ideas."
..
"By using substances like radium salts with variable energy content, Einstein envisioned experiments that could potentially demonstrate the
conversion of mass into energy and validate his theory.
However, it's important to note that while his proposal was conceptually sound, the exact experimental implementation and verification may
have required further advancements in technology and experimental techniques.
It reflects his curiosity and anticipation of future experiments at universities that could provide empirical evidence to support his groundbreaking ideas."
"At the time, radium was a known radioactive element that emitted
radiation and was associated with the release of energy.
Einstein's suggestion to test his theory using radium salts was based on
the understanding that radioactive materials, like radium,
undergo spontaneous disintegration, resulting in the emission of
radiation and the release of energy.
By using radium salts or similar radioactive materials, Einstein
envisioned conducting experiments to observe whether there would be any detectable changes in
the mass of the radioactive substances as they emitted energy. Such experiments would provide empirical evidence to support or
validate his mass-energy equivalence theory, as described by the
equation E=mc²."
The Starmaker wrote:
Sylvia Else wrote:
On 25-Aug-23 1:15 pm, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote:
By being indoctrinated in an ideology.
Why can't they defend that with reason?
Because they weren't persuaded by reason.
Do you ever wonder how a theory proposed by a patent clerk in his
twenties came to be accepted by the vast majority of physicists? Even if >>> it were true now that he is a supreme scientific figure whom no one can
contradict (spoiler alert, it's not), it wouldn't have been the case then. >>>
Sylvia.
"the vast majority of physicists" are lemmings and cranks and cooks.
"the vast majority of physicists" are too stupid to contradict what they don't understand!
"the vast majority of physicists" didn't and don't understand a theory proposed by a patent clerk in his
twenties.
Keep in mind that a theory proposed by a patent clerk in his
twenties didn't even mentioned Gravity once.
Am 27.08.2023 um 20:09 schrieb The Starmaker:
The Starmaker wrote:
Sylvia Else wrote:
On 25-Aug-23 1:15 pm, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote:
By being indoctrinated in an ideology.
Why can't they defend that with reason?
Because they weren't persuaded by reason.
Do you ever wonder how a theory proposed by a patent clerk in his
twenties came to be accepted by the vast majority of physicists? Even if >>> it were true now that he is a supreme scientific figure whom no one can >>> contradict (spoiler alert, it's not), it wouldn't have been the case then.
Sylvia.
"the vast majority of physicists" are lemmings and cranks and cooks.
"the vast majority of physicists" are too stupid to contradict what they don't understand!
"the vast majority of physicists" didn't and don't understand a theory proposed by a patent clerk in his
twenties.
Keep in mind that a theory proposed by a patent clerk in his
twenties didn't even mentioned Gravity once.
Also not mentioned were acceleration and induction.
SRT is more or less 'acceleration free', which includes gravity.
It is not a particularily likely restriction, because some sort of
gravity or other forms of acceleration should be present everywhere.
Also Einstein's discription of induction was, at least, odd, but
actually the word 'induction' cannot be found at all in his paper.
So we are not sure, whether or not he had induction in mind. But at
least he mentioned moving magnets and wires and electric fields inside conductors.
Missing was, for instance, the requirement for a conductor to form a
closed loop, if current shall flow throug it.
Usually the influence of moving magnets upon loops of wire is called 'induction', but not so in Einstein's paper.
Also streight linear motion with constant velocity is a rather harsch restriction, because that's not how the universe behaves.
...
TH
Also streight linear motion with constant velocity is a rather harsch
restriction, because that's not how the universe behaves.
...
TH
Simply, Albert Einstein didn't think about "acceleration". Like he
forgot Gravity existed then.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 300 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 106:22:24 |
| Calls: | 6,700 |
| Files: | 12,232 |
| Messages: | 5,350,363 |