• Kibo on mental illness-- Vincent Meunier, Ethan Brown, Glenn Ciolek,Har

    From Archimedes Plutonium@21:1/5 to Volney on Tue Aug 22 23:18:08 2023
    Kibo on mental illness-- Vincent Meunier, Ethan Brown, Glenn Ciolek,Harvard's Sheldon Glashow, Peter Higgs, Harry Cliff ever ask the question, which is the atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle which AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole while
    the real electron is a muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. In fact so stupid is this list of so called physicists that


    On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 9:41:57 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
    Hagfish of Math and Slime Eel of Physics
    "struggling for relevance" Plutonium
    is *always* wrong
    Re: "insignificant"

    Kibo Parry Moron-ey-Volney, 30 year paid nonstop stalker, defiler and demonizer On Saturday, July 1, 2023 at 10:03:19 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
    Re: Showing the flaws in Stewart,Fisher & Ziebur, Ellis & Gulick, Strang, Apostol of their fake proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus in AP's new book // Overhaul & Revitalization of Calculus// Math-psychology-sociology (Amazon's Kindle)
    Botfly of Math and Blowfly of Physics
    "mentally ill"
    I Pound His Male Rectum
    The Delicious Rump Man


    On Friday, July 14, 2023 at 4:20:59 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
    "mentally ill"
    Re: "imp of math"


    On Friday, July 14, 2023 at 4:20:59 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
    "mentally ill"

    Vincent Meunier, Ethan Brown, Glenn Ciolek,Harvard's Sheldon Glashow, Peter Higgs, Harry Cliff ever ask the question, which is the atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle which AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole while the real electron is a
    muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. In fact so stupid is this list of so called physicists that they went through life believing the slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, when in reality it is a Oval of 1 axis of symmetry for
    the cone has 1 axis of symmetry but ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry, something a cylinder at slant cut can provide, not a cone at slant cut. The minds of all these so called physicists are not good enough to be doing physics. In fact, so stupid in
    science and math are all these people that when told in High School or College that a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, they believed it, and believe in it to this day without so much as ever questioning the idea that a single cone and oval have
    just 1 axis of symmetry while ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry, and yet many on this list were awarded science prizes. Maybe for ignorance of science but not for truth of science.

    1) Too stupid to question if Thomson found Dirac's magnetic monopole and not the electron of atoms.
    2) Too stupid to realize that in the Rutherford,Geiger, Marsden Experiment when you have increase in velocity of bounce back alpha particles means head on collision with a larger proton torus, hence, the interior of gold atoms are toruses, no nucleus.
    3) Too stupid in logic to understand subatomic particles have jobs and tasks to do, not sit around on beaches sipping lemonade what Old Physics says. The proton is a 8 ring torus with muon as electron inside doing the Faraday law producing new
    electricity.
    4) Too stupid to understand stars and our Sun shine not from fusion but from Faraday law of each and every atom inside that star.

    5) think a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse when it is proven to be a Oval, never the ellipse. For the cone and oval have 1 axis of symmetry, while ellipse has 2.
    6) think Boole logic is correct with AND truth table being TFFF when it really is TTTF in order to avoid 2 OR 1 =3 with AND as subtraction
    7) can never do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and are too ignorant in math to understand that analysis of something is not proving something in their "limit hornswaggle"
    8) too stupid in science to ask the question of physics-- is the 1897 Thomson discovery of a 0.5MeV particle actually the Dirac magnetic monopole and that the muon is the true electron of atoms stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law.
    Showing that Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow, Ed Witten, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Arthur B. McDonald are sapheads when it comes to logical thinking in physics with their do nothing proton, do nothing electron.


    Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Physics dept
    Vincent Meunier, Ethan Brown, Glenn Ciolek, Julian S. Georg, Joel T. Giedt, Yong Sung Kim, Gyorgy Korniss, Toh-Ming Lu, Charles Martin, Joseph Darryl Michael, Heidi Jo Newberg, Moussa N'Gom, Peter Persans, John Schroeder, Michael Shur, Shawn-Yu Lin,
    Humberto Terrones, Gwo Ching Wang, Morris A Washington, Esther A. Wertz, Christian M. Wetzel, Ingrid Wilke, Shengbai Zhang

    Rensselaer math department
    Donald Schwendeman, Jeffrey Banks, Kristin Bennett, Mohamed Boudjelkha, Joseph Ecker, William Henshaw, Isom Herron, Mark H Holmes, David Isaacson, Elizabeth Kam, Ashwani Kapila, Maya Kiehl, Gregor Kovacic, Peter Kramer, Gina Kucinski, Rongjie Lai,
    Fengyan Li, Chjan Lim, Yuri V Lvov, Harry McLaughlin, John E. Mitchell, Bruce Piper, David A Schmidt, Daniel Stevenson, Yangyang Xu, Bulent Yener, Donald Drew, William Siegmann



    Roger Penrose, Reinhard Genzel, Andrea Ghez,
    Peter Higgs, Rainer Weiss, Kip S. Thorne, Barry C. Barish
    David J. Thouless_, F. Duncan M. Haldane, John M. Kosterlitz, Takaaki Kajita
    Arthur B. McDonald
    Francois Englert
    Saul Perlmutter
    Brian P. Schmidt
    Adam G. Riess
    Makoto Kobayashi
    Toshihide Maskawa_
    Yoichiro Nambu_
    John C. Mather
    George F. Smoot
    Roy J. Glauber_
    David J. Gross
    Hugh David Politzer
    Frank Wilczek
    Raymond Davis Jr. _
    Masatoshi Koshiba_
    Riccardo Giacconi_
    Gerardus 't Hooft
    Martinus J.G. Veltman_
    Jerome I. Friedman
    Henry W. Kendall_
    Richard E. Taylor_
    Carlo Rubbia
    Simon van der Meer_
    William Alfred Fowler_
    Kenneth G. Wilson_
    James Watson Cronin_
    Val Logsdon Fitch_
    Sheldon Lee Glashow
    Steven Weinberg_
    .
    .
    little fishes
    .
    .
    Layers of error thinking physics Re: 2-Comparative Analysis of failures of Logic with failures of Physics// one thinks 3 OR 2 =5 with 3 AND 2 = subtraction of either 3 or 2, while the other thinks proton to electron is 938MeV vs .5MeV when truly it
    is 840MeV to 105MeV

    Physical Review Letters: Proton Mass
    Yi-Bo Yang, Jian Liang, Yu-Jiang Bi, Ying Chen, Terrence Draper, Keh-Fei Liu, Zhaofeng Liu
    more and more layers of error thinking physics
    .
    .
    Edward Witten
    John Baez
    Brian Greene
    Lisa Randall
    Alan H. Guth
    Michael E. Brown
    Konstantin Batygin
    Ben Bullock
    Larry Harson
    Mark Barton, PhD in Physics, The University of Queensland, physicist with National Astronomical Observatory of Japan
    Answered Aug 26, 2013 · Author has 8.7k answers and 10.3m answer views None at all - he was a raving nutter.
    Richard A. Muller, crank at Berkeley
    Jennifer Kahn, Discover, science hater
    Eric Francis Coppolino, newsreporter hatred of science, George Witte, St.Martin's Press science hater
    Toby Howard, The Guardian, science hater


    #2-1, 137th published book

    Introduction to AP's TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Physics textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
    by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)



    #1 New Release in Electromagnetic Theory

    This will be AP's 137th published book on science. And the number 137 is special to me for it is the number of QED, Quantum Electrodynamics as the inverse fine structure constant. I can always remember 137 as that special constant of physics and so I
    can remember where Teaching True Physics was started by me.

    Time has come for the world to have the authoritative textbooks for all of High School and College education. Written by the leading physics expert of the time. The last such was Feynman in the 1960s with Feynman Lectures on Physics. The time before
    was Maxwell in 1860s with his books and Encyclopedia Britannica editorship. The time is ripe in 2020 for the new authoritative texts on physics. It will be started in 2020 which is 60 years after Feynman. In the future, I request the physics community
    updates the premier physics textbook series at least every 30 years. For we can see that pattern of 30 years approximately from Faraday in 1830 to Maxwell in 1860 to Planck and Rutherford in about 1900, to Dirac in 1930 to Feynman in 1960 and finally to
    AP in 1990 and 2020. So much happens in physics after 30 years, that we need the revisions to take place in a timely manner. But also, as we move to Internet publishing such as Amazon's Kindle, we can see that updates can take place very fast, as editing
    can be a ongoing monthly or yearly activity. I for one keep constantly updating all my published books, at least I try to.

    Feynman was the best to make the last authoritative textbook series for his concentration was QED, Quantum Electrodynamics, the pinnacle peak of physics during the 20th century. Of course the Atom Totality theory took over after 1990 and all of
    physics; for all sciences are under the Atom Totality theory.
    And as QED was the pinnacle peak before 1990, the new pinnacle peak is the Atom Totality theory. The Atom Totality theory is the advancement of QED, for the Atom Totality theory primal axiom says -- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but Electricity
    and Magnetism.
    Length: 64 pages

    Product details
    • File Size : 790 KB
    • Publication Date : October 5, 2020
    • Word Wise : Enabled
    • Print Length : 64 pages
    • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
    • Screen Reader : Supported
    • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
    • X-Ray : Not Enabled
    • Language: : English
    • ASIN : B08KS4YGWY
    • Lending : Enabled
    • Best Sellers Rank: #430,602 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
    ◦ #39 in Electromagnetic Theory
    ◦ #73 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
    ◦ #74 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads

    #2-2, 145th published book
    TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS//Junior High School// Physics textbook series, book 2
    Kindle Edition
    by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
    What I am doing is clearing the field of physics, clearing it of all the silly mistakes and errors and beliefs that clutter up physics. Clearing it of its fraud and fakeries and con-artistry. I thought of doing these textbooks starting with Senior
    year High School, wherein I myself started learning physics. But because of so much fraud and fakery in physics education, I believe we have to drop down to Junior year High School to make a drastic and dramatic emphasis on fakery and con-artistry that
    so much pervades science and physics in particular. So that we have two years in High School to learn physics. And discard the nonsense of physics brainwash that Old Physics filled the halls and corridors of education.

    Product details
    • ASIN : B08PC99JJB
    • Publication date : November 29, 2020
    • Language: : English
    • File size : 682 KB
    • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
    • Screen Reader : Supported
    • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
    • X-Ray : Not Enabled
    • Word Wise : Enabled
    • Print length : 78 pages
    • Lending : Enabled
    • Best Sellers Rank: #185,995 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
    ◦ #42 in Two-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
    ◦ #344 in Physics (Kindle Store)
    ◦ #2,160 in Physics (Books)

    #2-3, 146th published book

    TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Senior High School// Physics textbook series, book 3
    Kindle Edition
    by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

    I believe that in knowing the history of a science is knowing half of that science. And that if you are amiss of knowing the history behind a science, you have only a partial understanding of the concepts and ideas behind the science. I further
    believe it is easier to teach a science by teaching its history than any other means of teaching. So for senior year High School, I believe physics history is the best way of teaching physics. And in later years of physics courses, we can always pick up
    on details. So I devote this senior year High School physics to a history of physics, but only true physics. And there are few books written on the history of physics, so I chose Asimov's The History of Physics, 1966 as the template book for this
    textbook. Now Asimov's book is full of error and mistakes, and that is disappointing but all of Old Physics is full of error. On errors and mistakes of Old Physics, the best I can do is warn the students, and the largest warning of all is that whenever
    someone in Old Physics says "electron" what they are talking about is really the Dirac magnetic monopole. And whenever they talk about the Rutherford-Bohr model of the atom, they are talking about huge huge grave mistakes, for the true atom is protons as
    8 ringed toruses with a muon stuck inside of a proton doing the Faraday law and producing those magnetic monopoles as electricity. I use Asimov's book as a template but in the future, I hope to rewrite this textbook using no template at all, that is if I
    have time in the future.
    Cover Picture: Is the book The History of Physics, by Isaac Asimov, 1966 and on top of the book are 4 cut-outs of bent circles representing magnetic monopoles which revolutionizes modern physics, especially the ElectroMagnetic theory.

    Product details
    • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B08RK33T8V
    • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 28, 2020
    • Language ‏ : ‎ English
    • File size ‏ : ‎ 794 KB
    • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
    • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
    • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
    • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
    • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
    • Print length ‏ : ‎ 123 pages
    • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
    • Best Sellers Rank: #4,167,235 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
    ◦ #15,099 in Physics (Kindle Store)
    ◦ #91,163 in Physics (Books)


    #2-4, 151st published book

    TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// 1st year College// Physics textbook series, book 4 Kindle Edition
    by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

    Preface: This is AP's 151st book of science published. It is one of my most important books of science because 1st year college physics is so impressionable on students, if they should continue with physics, or look elsewhere for a career. And also,
    physics is a crossroad to all the other hard core sciences, where physics course is mandatory such as in chemistry or even biology. I have endeavored to make physics 1st year college to be as easy and simple to learn. In this endeavor to make physics
    super easy, I have made the writing such that you will see core ideas in all capital letters as single sentences as a educational tool. And I have made this textbook chapter writing follow a logical pattern of both algebra and geometry concepts,
    throughout. The utmost importance of logic in physics needs to be seen and understood. For I have never seen a physics book, prior to this one that is logical. Every Old Physics textbook I have seen is scatter-brained in topics and in writing. I use as
    template book of Halliday & Resnick because a edition of H&R was one I was taught physics at University of Cincinnati in 1969. And in 1969, I had a choice of majors, do I major in geology, or mathematics, or in physics, for I will graduate from UC in
    1972. For me, geology was too easy, but physics was too tough, so I ended up majoring in mathematics. If I had been taught in 1969 using this textbook that I have written, I would have ended up majoring in physics, my first love. For physics is not hard,
    not hard at all, once you clear out the mistakes and the obnoxious worthless mathematics that clutters up Old Physics, and the illogic that smothers much of Old Physics.

    Maybe it was good that I had those impressions of physics education of poor education, which still exists throughout physics today. Because maybe I am forced to write this book, because of that awful experience of learning physics in 1969. Without
    that awful experience, maybe this textbook would have never been written by me.

    Cover picture is the template book of Halliday & Resnick, 1988, 3rd edition Fundamentals of Physics and sitting on top are cut outs of "half bent circles, bent at 90 degrees" to imitate magnetic monopoles. Magnetic Monopoles revolutionizes physics
    education, and separates-out, what is Old Physics from what is New Physics.

    Product details
    • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09JW5DVYM
    • Publication date ‏ : ‎ October 19, 2021
    • Language ‏ : ‎ English
    • File size ‏ : ‎ 1035 KB
    • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
    • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
    • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
    • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
    • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
    • Print length ‏ : ‎ 386 pages
    • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
    • Best Sellers Rank: #4,874,333 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
    ◦ #526 in Electromagnetic Theory
    ◦ #1,321 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
    ◦ #9,546 in Electromagnetism (Books)



    #2-5, 174th published book

    TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, 2nd year College
    by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Kindle Edition

    Preface: At the moment this is a physics book for 2nd year College. But as the months and years go by I intend to convert it into a textbook of about 200 to 300 pages. It is mostly about thermodynamics for in my own college education 1968-1972 at
    University of Cincinnati, I took physics thermodynamics in the 2nd year (if memory has not failed me).
    Cover-Picture: Is a iphone photograph of the Chemistry textbook I used at UC 1968-1972 with my own paper cut-outs of magnetic monopoles. Pictured are 4 bent circles, bent at 90degrees from diameter and each bent circle is a individual magnetic
    monopole.

    Product details
    • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09TKL4HMC
    • Publication date ‏ : ‎ February 27, 2022
    • Language ‏ : ‎ English
    • File size ‏ : ‎ 675 KB
    • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
    • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
    • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
    • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
    • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
    • Print length ‏ : ‎ 41 pages
    • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled



    #2-6, 177th published book
    TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, Architecture of Atoms, 3rd year College
    by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Kindle Edition

    Preface: I come to teaching physics for 3rd year College as the Architecture of Atoms. My writing style will be prose-narrative, until I add on exercise problems and convert it into a textbook. The 1st year College, has to be the equations and laws
    of electricity and magnetism. For the primal-axiom over all of physics is-- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism. The 2nd year College is thermodynamics. And now the 3rd year College physics has to teach the Architecture, the
    geometry of the inside and exterior surface of the atom. One of the greatest faults, misery, and anti-science teaching of Old Physics is their denial that subatomic particles have to be something more than tiny balls tiny spheres that do-nothing, perform
    nothing, function as nothing. That the proton and neutron and true electron=muon, has to be matter with a function and purpose and design and task and job. This is a year of physics teaching of the architecture of the atom.
    Cover Picture: A iphone photograph of my book chemistry book, a long time favorite of mine of CHEM ONE, 2nd edition, Waser, Trueblood, Knobler, 1980, and page 307 of that book. Why this page? Because it was instrumental in my discovery of the true
    Architecture of Atoms. Not many professors of chemistry or physics dive into the Shrodinger Equation that results in a meaningful teaching of "matter waves". Matter waves are the heart of understanding the geometry of Atomic Architecture.

    Product details
    • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09VFH9QST
    • Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 12, 2022
    • Language ‏ : ‎ English
    • File size ‏ : ‎ 823 KB
    • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
    • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
    • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
    • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
    • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
    • Print length ‏ : ‎ 74 pages
    • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled



    #2-7, 178th published book

    TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, Architecture of Light Waves & Energy, 4th year College
    by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Kindle edition)


    Preface: This is 4th year College Physics and the important ideas of physics to learn as last year undergraduate school is the architecture and geometry of the Light Wave & Energy in physics. This is New Physics and not Old Physics. New Physics is
    defined as physics that knows and uses the true electron of atoms is the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus and doing the Faraday law, creating new electrical energy that is storaged in the neutrons of atoms until they grow from 1eV into 945MeV and
    then create a new higher atomic numbered atom or emitted as radioactivity. Old Physics mistakenly identified the electron of atoms as the 0.5MeV particle that AP calls the Dirac magnetic monopole. In 3rd year College we studied the architecture of the
    interior of atoms. In 4th year College we study the architecture of Light Waves & Energy.

    The template book for 4th year College is Feynman's 1985 book of QED.

    Cover Picture: Is my iphone photograph of the template book for this book. Feynman's 1985 QED, quantum electrodynamics, showing my plastic toy model of DNA and my cut-outs of 4 bent circles that each bent circle represents one magnetic monopole. I
    arranged the monopoles into a single strand of a cycloid wave.

    Product details
    • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09W58XGDW
    • Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 21, 2022
    • Language ‏ : ‎ English
    • File size ‏ : ‎ 824 KB
    • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
    • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
    • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
    • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
    • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
    • Print length ‏ : ‎ 66 pages
    • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled


    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Archimedes Plutonium@21:1/5 to Volney on Sun Sep 3 02:15:50 2023
    Volney on.. CalTech_Dr.Kip Thorne,Dr.David Goodstein,Dr.Frances Arnold (chem), Dr.Barry Barish, Dr.Rudolph Marcus (chem), Dr.Hugh Politzer NSF Dr.Panchanathan,Alejandro Adem, shithead oaf of math,Purdue Univ_France Cordova, howling crazy fuckdog

    On Sunday, September 3, 2023 at 12:31:40 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote: >"illogical"
    "shithead oaf of math> fails at math and science:

    Why Volney?? Because they are so sloppy and slipshod in Physics experiment of Water Electrolysis, stopping and ceasing the experiment before weighing the mass of the hydrogen compared to mass of oxygen. And to think, Caltech discovered the muon, but
    cannot even finish water electrolysis.

    Volney's physics morons CalTech_Dr.Frances Arnold (chem), Dr.Barry Barish, Dr.Rudolph Marcus (chem), Dr.Hugh Politzer NSF Dr.Panchanathan,Alejandro Adem, Purdue Univ_France Cordova, howling crazy fuckdog

    On Saturday, September 2, 2023 at 11:38:41 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
    "Court Jester of Physics"
    "howling crazy fuckdog> fails at math and science:

    Volney is the NSF staff and CalTech physics department a leftover relic of too many Dunning-Kruger on staff before Roberts Supreme Court overturned it. And now Dunning-Kruger physicists and Dunning-Kruger Dr. Panchanathan are in jeopardy of their Dunning-
    Kruger view of science???

    Why Volney?? Because they stop short of completing the Water Electrolysis Experiment by only looking at volume, when they are meant to weigh the mass of hydrogen versus oxygen?? Such shoddy minds in experimental physics and chemistry.

    CalTech math dept

    Michael Aschbacher, Alexei Borodin, Danny Calegari
    Matthias Flach, Anton N. Kapustin, Alexander Kechris
    Alexei Kitaev, Matilde Marcolli, Nikolai Makarov, Vladimir Markovic, Hiroshi Oguri, Eric Rains, Dinakar Ramakrishnan
    Barry Simon, Richard Wilson, Tom Graber, Sergei Gukov,
    Elena Mantovan, Yi NI,

    Caltech Physics Dept

    Felix Boehm, Steven Frautschi
    Murray Gell-Mann, David Goodstein, Thomas Phillips,
    John Schwarz, Barry Simon, Kip Thorne, Petr Vogel,
    Rochus Vogt, Ward Whaling, Michael E. Brown,
    Konstantin Batygin, Dr.Frances Arnold (chem), Dr.Barry Barish, Dr.Rudolph Marcus (chem), Dr.Hugh Politzer



    3-Volney on NSF Dr.Panchanathan on Purdue Dr. France Cordova "Drag Queen of Science" "irrelevant" Why Volney?? Is it because Dr.Panchanathan is a math failure with his slant cut of cone a ellipse, when in reality it is a oval

    Kibo on..NSF Rebecca Lynn Keiser,Dunning-Kruger Arden Lee Bement Jr. Fuckhole Dr.Panchanathan of science

    On Thursday, August 31, 2023 at 8:18:48 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
    "Drag Queen of Science"
    "irrelevant"

    On Tuesday, August 29, 2023 at 5:58:25 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
    "the FUCKHOLE of math"
    On Tuesday, August 29, 2023 at 11:28:58 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
    "Kim Jong Un's stooge"

    On Tuesday, August 22, 2023 at 12:08:44 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
    is *always* wrong.

    Kibo, Volney, does Dr. Panchanathan remind you of Dr. Silberman in the Terminator movies--rock hard insanity

    Re: kibo-Parry-Moroney, the FUCKHOLE of sci.math, sci.physics
    By Richard Tobin Jul 4, 2019, 9:45:05 AM

    Re: Kibo Parry M sickfuck stalker along with his Dunning Kruger sickfuck psychologists who guide Kibo// Kibo claims that Ruth Charney, Dr. Panchanathan, Andrew Wiles, Terence Tao, Sheldon Glashow never had a single truth in their entire life, says Kibo
    Dec 31, 2022, 8:51 PM
    by Herp Derpington

    Kibo Parry Moron-Volney blowing his cover with the CIA in 1997
    Re: Archimedes Vanadium, America's most beloved poster
    On Sunday, June 8, 1997 at 2:00:00 AM UTC-5, Scott Dorsey wrote:
    In article <5nefan$i06$9...@news.thecia.net> kibo greps <ki...@shell.thecia.net> writes:



    ---quoting Wikipedia ---
    Controversy
    Many government and university installations blocked, threatened to block, or attempted to shut-down The World's Internet connection until Software Tool & Die was eventually granted permission by the National Science Foundation to provide public Internet
    access on "an experimental basis."
    --- end quote ---

    NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

    Dr. Panchanathan , present day
    NSF Dr. Panchanathan, F. Fleming Crim, Dorothy E Aronson, Brian Stone, James S Ulvestad (math), Rebecca Lynn Keiser, Vernon D. Ross, Lloyd Whitman, John J. Veysey (physics), Scott Stanley
    France Anne Cordova
    Subra Suresh (bioengineer)
    Arden Lee Bement Jr. (nuclear engineering)
    Rita R. Colwell (microbiology)
    Neal Francis Lane
    John Howard Gibbons 1993

    Barry Shein, kibo parry std world
    Jim Frost, Joe "Spike" Ilacqua


    Canada-- NSERC , Alejandro Adem (math) , Navdeep Bains, Francois-Philippe Champagne



    News starting to come in that AP's Water Electrolysis Experiment proves the true formula of Water is H4O, not H2O is starting to come in.
    3 views
    Subscribe

    Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
    Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
    Aug 30, 2023, 10:19:20 PM (yesterday)



    to Plutonium Atom Universe
    News starting to come in that AP's Water Electrolysis Experi
  • From Archimedes Plutonium@21:1/5 to All on Mon Sep 4 14:39:28 2023
    Volney on.. NSF Dr.Panchanathan,CalTech_Dr.Kip Thorne,Dr.David Goodstein,Dr.Frances Arnold (chem), Dr.Barry Barish, Dr.Rudolph Marcus (chem), Dr.Hugh Politzer NSF Dr.Panchanathan,Alejandro Adem, shithead oaf of math,Purdue Univ_France Cordova, howling
    crazy fuckdog

    On Sunday, September 3, 2023 at 12:31:40 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote: >"illogical"
    "shithead oaf of math> fails at math and science:

    Why Volney?? Because they are so sloppy and slipshod in Physics experiment of Water Electrolysis, stopping and ceasing the experiment before weighing the mass of the hydrogen compared to mass of oxygen. And to think, Caltech discovered the muon, but
    cannot even finish water electrolysis.

    Volney's physics morons CalTech_Dr.Frances Arnold (chem), Dr.Barry Barish, Dr.Rudolph Marcus (chem), Dr.Hugh Politzer NSF Dr.Panchanathan,Alejandro Adem, Purdue Univ_France Cordova, howling crazy fuckdog

    On Saturday, September 2, 2023 at 11:38:41 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
    "Court Jester of Physics"
    "howling crazy fuckdog> fails at math and science:

    Volney is the NSF staff and CalTech physics department a leftover relic of too many Dunning-Kruger on staff before Roberts Supreme Court overturned it. And now Dunning-Kruger physicists and Dunning-Kruger Dr. Panchanathan are in jeopardy of their
    Dunning-Kruger view of science???

    Why Volney?? Because they stop short of completing the Water Electrolysis Experiment by only looking at volume, when they are meant to weigh the mass of hydrogen versus oxygen?? Such shoddy minds in experimental physics and chemistry.

    CalTech math dept

    Michael Aschbacher, Alexei Borodin, Danny Calegari
    Matthias Flach, Anton N. Kapustin, Alexander Kechris
    Alexei Kitaev, Matilde Marcolli, Nikolai Makarov, Vladimir Markovic, Hiroshi Oguri, Eric Rains, Dinakar Ramakrishnan
    Barry Simon, Richard Wilson, Tom Graber, Sergei Gukov,
    Elena Mantovan, Yi NI,

    Caltech Physics Dept

    Felix Boehm, Steven Frautschi
    Murray Gell-Mann, David Goodstein, Thomas Phillips,
    John Schwarz, Barry Simon, Kip Thorne, Petr Vogel,
    Rochus Vogt, Ward Whaling, Michael E. Brown,
    Konstantin Batygin, Dr.Frances Arnold (chem), Dr.Barry Barish, Dr.Rudolph Marcus (chem), Dr.Hugh Politzer



    3-Volney on NSF Dr.Panchanathan on Purdue Dr. France Cordova "Drag Queen of Science" "irrelevant" Why Volney?? Is it because Dr.Panchanathan is a math failure with his slant cut of cone a ellipse, when in reality it is a oval

    Kibo on..NSF Rebecca Lynn Keiser,Dunning-Kruger Arden Lee Bement Jr. Fuckhole Dr.Panchanathan of science

    On Thursday, August 31, 2023 at 8:18:48 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
    "Drag Queen of Science"
    "irrelevant"

    On Tuesday, August 29, 2023 at 5:58:25 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
    "the FUCKHOLE of math"
    On Tuesday, August 29, 2023 at 11:28:58 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
    "Kim Jong Un's stooge"

    On Tuesday, August 22, 2023 at 12:08:44 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
    is *always* wrong.

    Kibo, Volney, does Dr. Panchanathan remind you of Dr. Silberman in the Terminator movies--rock hard insanity

    Re: kibo-Parry-Moroney, the FUCKHOLE of sci.math, sci.physics
    By Richard Tobin Jul 4, 2019, 9:45:05 AM

    Re: Kibo Parry M sickfuck stalker along with his Dunning Kruger sickfuck psychologists who guide Kibo// Kibo claims that Ruth Charney, Dr. Panchanathan, Andrew Wiles, Terence Tao, Sheldon Glashow never had a single truth in their entire life, says Kibo
    Dec 31, 2022, 8:51 PM
    by Herp Derpington

    Kibo Parry Moron-Volney blowing his cover with the CIA in 1997
    Re: Archimedes Vanadium, America's most beloved poster
    On Sunday, June 8, 1997 at 2:00:00 AM UTC-5, Scott Dorsey wrote:
    In article <5nefan$i06$9...@news.thecia.net> kibo greps <ki...@shell.thecia.net> writes:



    ---quoting Wikipedia ---
    Controversy
    Many government and university installations blocked, threatened to block, or attempted to shut-down The World's Internet connection until Software Tool & Die was eventually granted permission by the National Science Foundation to provide public
    Internet access on "an experimental basis."
    --- end quote ---

    NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

    Dr. Panchanathan , present day
    NSF Dr. Panchanathan, F. Fleming Crim, Dorothy E Aronson, Brian Stone, James S Ulvestad (math), Rebecca Lynn Keiser, Vernon D. Ross, Lloyd Whitman, John J. Veysey (physics), Scott Stanley
    France Anne Cordova
    Subra Suresh (bioengineer)
    Arden Lee Bement Jr. (nuclear engineering)
    Rita R. Colwell (microbiology)
    Neal Francis Lane
    John Howard Gibbons 1993

    Barry Shein, kibo parry std world
    Jim Frost, Joe "Spike" Ilacqua


    Canada-- NSERC , Alejandro Adem (math) , Navdeep Bains, Francois-Philippe Champagne



    News starting to come in that AP's Water Electrolysis Experiment proves the true formula of Water is H4O, not H2O is starting to come in.
    3 views
    Subscribe

    Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
    Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
    Aug 30, 2023, 10:19:20 PM (yesterday)



    to Plutonium Atom Universe
    News starting to come in that AP's Water Electrolysis Experiment proves the true formula of Water is H4O, not H2O is starting to come in.

    I received a letter today of Experiment results on Water Electrolysis of weighing the hydrogen test tube versus oxygen test tube and the result is 1/4 atomic mass units of Hydrogen compared to Oxygen.

    The researcher weighing 1600 micrograms of hydrogen, using a Eisco-Brownlee-Water-Electrolysis Apparatus.

    Using sulfuric acid as electrolyte on ultra pure water. Using low voltage DC of 1.5 volts, 1 amp.

    I am not surprised that news of the true formula of Water is H4O comes so quickly. For not much in science is more important than knowing the truth of Water. And this means the start of the complete downfall and throwing out the sick Standard Model of
    Physics, for it is such an insane theory that it cannot get passed the idea of its subatomic particles as stick and ball, with no job, no function, no task. The Standard Model of Physics, is crazy insane physics for it is all postdiction, never
    prediction. The idea that the hydrogen atom is H2 not H, is because of the prediction of Atom Totality Theory where a atom is a proton torus with muon inside doing the Faraday law and all atoms require at least 1 capacitor. That means the one proton in
    H2 serves as a neutron to the other proton, storaging the electricity produced by the other proton.

    The true Hydrogen Atom is H2 for all atoms need at least one capacitor, and one of the protons in H2 serves as a neutron.

    Sad that chemistry and physics throughout the 20th century were too stupid to actually weigh the mass of hydrogen and oxygen in electrolysis, no, the ignorant fools stopped at looking when they saw the volume of hydrogen was twice that of oxygen. A
    real scientist is not that shoddy and slipshod ignorant, the real scientist then proceeds with -- let us weigh the hydrogen test tube mass versus the oxygen test tube mass.

    Thanks for the news!!!!!

    AP

    News starting to come in that AP's Water Electrolysis Experiment proves the true formula of Water is H4O, not H2O is starting to come in.
    Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
    Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
    Aug 31, 2023, 11:11:46 AM (yesterday)



    to Plutonium Atom Universe
    There is another experiment that achieves the same result that Water is truly H4O and not H2O, but I suspect this second method is hugely fraught with difficulty.

    The prediction of H4O comes from the Physics idea that a Atom is composed, all atoms mind you, is composed of a proton torus with muon/s inside going round and round thrusting through the torus in the Faraday law and producing electricity. So that when
    you have Hydrogen without a neutron, there is no way to collect the electricity produced by the Faraday law. Think of it as a automobile engine, you cannot have a engine if there is no crank shaft to collect the energy from the thrusting piston inside
    the crankcase.

    Same thing with an Atom, it needs 3 parts-- muon as bar magnet, proton as torus of coils, and a capacitor to storage the produced electricity. If one of those parts is missing, the entity is a Subatomic particle and not a atom.

    So, when we have Hydrogen as a proton with muon inside, it is not a Atom, until it has a neutron, or, has another proton of hydrogen H2, then it is a Atom.

    So that H2 is not a molecule but a Atom. H alone is a subatomic particle.

    SECOND EXPERIMENT:

    Much harder than Water Electrolysis.

    We need to get two identical containers.

    We need to be able to make pure heavy-water with deuterium. Deuterium is proton + neutron as hydrogen. Proton + proton is H2 as hydrogen.

    So we have two identical containers and we fill one with pure heavy water, deuterium water.

    We have the second container and we fill it with pure (light) water.

    We now weigh both of them.

    If AP is correct, that water is really H4O and not H2O, then both containers should weigh almost the same. Only a tiny fraction difference because the neutron is known to be 940MeV versus proton in Old Physics as 938MeV a tiny difference of 2MeV, but
    we realize we have a huge number of water molecules in the two identical containers.

    If water is truly H4O, the weights should be almost the same. If water is H2O, then there is a **large difference** in weights.

    But the Water Electrolysis experiment is much easier to conduct and get results.

    AP
    Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
    Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
    Aug 31, 2023, 5:25:19 PM (21 hours ago)



    to Plutonium Atom Universe
    And, there is the biological processes that apparently cannot distinguish between heavy water and that of regular normal water.

    Deuterium Water is the same in biology as is normal regular water. This means that water must be H4O, due to biology as proof.

    Deuterium Water in atomic mass units is 16 for the oxygen and 4 for the deuterium.

    Regular normal Water in atomic mass units is 16 for the oxygen and 4 for the 4 protons in H4O.

    Old Physics and Old Chemistry had regular water as H2O in atomic mass units of 16 oxygen and 2 hydrogen for 2 protons.

    If biology functions whether heavy water or normal water all the same, then water itself must be H4O.

    Now, there maybe some animal or plant that can separate out heavy water from H4O water???

    AP, King of Science
    Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
    Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
    5:05 AM (9 hours ago)



    to Plutonium Atom Universe
    Searching the literature today for where biology needs as essential deuterium water. And not too surprised that it is a essential requirement in metabolism. In fact one web site listed the need for deuterium more than the need of many minerals and
    vitamins.

    Now tonight I came up with two new exciting experiments to verify that Water is truly H4O and not H2O.

    H4O is 4 protons with muons inside the 840MeV proton toruses.

    Deuterium water is DOD. And the difference between D2O and H4O is merely the difference of 4MeV for as last reported, neutron = 940MeV and proton (with muon inside) is 938MeV, a difference of 2MeV but for water is 2+2 = 4MeV.

    So these two new experiments take advantage of the fact that what we think is normal regular water is actually very close to heavy water of D2O, with only a 4MeV difference.

    EXPERIMENT #3 Water layers in still pond of D2O mixed with H4O (what we thought was H2O.

    So in this experiment we get a clear glass container and mix H4O with D2O. If Old Physics is correct, the heavy water should sink rapidly in the container while the light water floats to the top rapidly. And we have some sort of beam of photons that
    can distinguish D2O from H4O (thought of as H2O. We obtain pure D2O and pure H4O each filling 1/2 of the container. We stir and mix them. And then we observe with the EM beam for separation. If the light water is truly H4O, it takes a long time for the
    D2O to be on bottom and H4O on top. We measure the time of a settled container and determine this time from the theoretical 4MeV difference should take a long time, whereas if Old Physics is correct, the separation would be almost instantly and quick
    time.


    EXPERIMENT #4 also plays on this minor difference of 4MeV. We devise a sort of squirt gun for D2O and a identical squirt gun for H4O (what we call H2O). We put pure D2O in one squirt gun and the H40 or light water in the other squirt gun. Both guns
    forcing the water a certain distance.

    If AP is correct that light water is really H4O and not H2O as we squirt both guns, where the water lands should be almost the same distance considering H4O is only 4MeV apart from D2O.

    If Old Physics and Old Chemistry is correct, then D2O water is 940 + 940 = 1880MeV apart from light water of H2O, and H4O is only 4MeV apart.

    So where the squirt gun lands the D2O is a very much shorter distance than a H2O land, but a H4 land distance is nearly the same as the D2O land.

    These two experiments are very exciting and would be a very nice confirming evidence to Water Electrolysis actual weighing the mass in atomic mass units.

    AP
    Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
    Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
    2:33 PM (now)



    to Plutonium Atom Universe
    On Friday, September 1, 2023 at 5:07:13 AM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
    Searching the literature today for where biology needs as essential deuterium water. And not too surprised that it is a essential requirement in metabolism. In fact one web site listed the need for deuterium more than the need of many minerals and
    vitamins.

    Now tonight I came up with two new exciting experiments to verify that Water is truly H4O and not H2O.

    H4O is 4 protons with muons inside the 840MeV proton toruses.

    Deuterium water is DOD. And the difference between D2O and H4O is merely the difference of 4MeV for as last reported, neutron = 940MeV and proton (with muon inside) is 938MeV, a difference of 2MeV but for water is 2+2 = 4MeV.

    So these two new experiments take advantage of the fact that what we think is normal regular water is actually very close to heavy water of D2O, with only a 4MeV difference.

    EXPERIMENT #3 Water layers in still pond of D2O mixed with H4O (what we thought was H2O.

    So in this experiment we get a clear glass container and mix H4O with D2O. If Old Physics is correct, the heavy water should sink rapidly in the container while the light water floats to the top rapidly. And we have some sort of beam of photons that
    can distinguish D2O from H4O (thought of as H2O. We obtain pure D2O and pure H4O each filling 1/2 of the container. We stir and mix them. And then we observe with the EM beam for separation. If the light water is truly H4O, it takes a long time for the
    D2O to be on bottom and H4O on top. We measure the time of a settled container and determine this time from the theoretical 4MeV difference should take a long time, whereas if Old Physics is correct, the separation would be almost instantly and quick
    time.


    Apparently this Experiment is already done and called for-- There is Uniform Distribution of heavy water Deuterium Water in the Oceans, Lakes, Ponds, Streams and Rivers. Heavy Water is not layered in the oceans or lakes or ponds or streams or rivers.
    Uniformity means that the difference between D2O and H4O is so slight of a difference (only 4MeV, compared to 1880MeV for H2O, that Brownian motion keeps the D2O and H4O in a Uniform Distribution in all bodies of water. I was going through the research
    literature today and find that scientists discover Uniformity of Distribution of deuterium water. This thus closes the case on Water, for uniformity of distribution of D2O implies that Water is itself H4O and not H2O.

    AP, King of Science

    _Volney's physics morons MIT_Dr.Frank Wilczek,Dr.Rainer Weiss,Dr.Carolyn Bertozzi(chem), K. Barry Sharpless(chem), NSF Dr.Panchanathan,Alejandro Adem, Purdue Univ_France Cordova,William Bertozzi, Robert Birgeneau, Hale Bradt, Bernard Burke,

    My 250th published book.

    TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY; H2 is the hydrogen Atom and water is H4O, not H2O// Chemistry

    by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle)

    Prologue: This textbook is 1/2 research history and 1/2 factual textbook combined as one textbook. For many of the experiments described here-in have not yet been performed, such as water is really H4O not H2O. Written in a style of history research
    with date-time markers, and fact telling. And there are no problem sets. This book is intended for 1st year college. Until I include problem sets and exercises, I leave it to the professor and instructor to provide such. And also, chemistry is hugely a
    laboratory science, even more so than physics, so a first year college student in the lab to test whether Water is really H4O and not H2O is mighty educational.

    Preface: This is my 250th book of science, and the first of my textbooks on Teaching True Chemistry. I have completed the Teaching True Physics and the Teaching True Mathematics textbook series. But had not yet started on a Teaching True Chemistry
    textbook series. What got me started on this project is the fact that no chemistry textbook had the correct formula for water which is actually H4O and not H2O. Leaving the true formula for hydroxyl groups as H2O and not OH. But none of this is possible
    in Old Chemistry, Old Physics where they had do-nothing subatomic particles that sit around and do nothing or go whizzing around the outside of balls in a nucleus, in a mindless circling. Once every subatomic particle has a job, task, function, then
    water cannot be H2O but rather H4O. And a hydrogen atom cannot be H alone but is actually H2. H2 is not a molecule of hydrogen but a full fledged Atom, a single atom of hydrogen.

    Cover Picture: Sorry for the crude sketch work but chemistry and physics students are going to have to learn to make such sketches in a minute or less. Just as they make Lewis diagrams or ball & stick diagrams. My 4-5 minute sketch-work of the Water
    molecule H4O plus the subatomic particle H, and the hydrogen atom H2. Showing how one H is a proton torus with muon inside (blue color) doing the Faraday law. Protons are toruses with many windings. Protons are the coils in Faraday law while muons are
    the bar magnets. Neutrons are the capacitors as parallel plates, the outer skin cover of atoms.

    Product details
    • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B0CCLPTBDG
    • Publication date ‏ : ‎ July 21, 2023
    • Language ‏ : ‎ English
    • File size ‏ : ‎ 788 KB
    • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
    • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
    • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
    • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
    • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
    • Sticky notes ‏ : ‎ On Kindle Scribe
    • Print length ‏ : ‎ 168 pages






    y z
    | /
    | /
    |/______ x

    Read my recent posts in peace and quiet. https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe Archimedes Plutonium

    More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing sci.math, sci.physics. So AP has decided to put all NEW WORK, to his newsgroup. And there is little wonder because in AP's newsgroups, there is only solid pure science going on, not a gang of
    hate spewing misfits blighting the skies.

    Volney's physics morons CalTech_Dr.Frances Arnold (chem), Dr.Barry Barish, Dr.Rudolph Marcus (chem), Dr.Hugh Politzer NSF Dr.Panchanathan,Alejandro Adem, Purdue Univ_France Cordova, howling crazy fuckdog

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)