instead of at Pangea. There is no push mechanism for Pangea.
How could the friction be overcome? and push in a
preferred direction alone? If Pangea is still pushed now will
it not end up on the other side instead?
mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchr...@gmail.com> wrote:
instead of at Pangea. There is no push mechanism for Pangea.Typical idiotic moron babble.
How could the friction be overcome? and push in a
preferred direction alone? If Pangea is still pushed now will
it not end up on the other side instead?
On Sunday, August 13, 2023 at 8:46:10 AM UTC-7, Jim Pennino wrote:
mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchr...@gmail.com> wrote:
instead of at Pangea. There is no push mechanism for Pangea.Typical idiotic moron babble.
How could the friction be overcome? and push in a
preferred direction alone? If Pangea is still pushed now will
it not end up on the other side instead?
What would form pangea?
What pushes it apart against continental friction?
No. The continents formed where they are now in the beginning.
mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchr...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sunday, August 13, 2023 at 8:46:10 AM UTC-7, Jim Pennino wrote:
mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchr...@gmail.com> wrote:
instead of at Pangea. There is no push mechanism for Pangea.Typical idiotic moron babble.
How could the friction be overcome? and push in a
preferred direction alone? If Pangea is still pushed now will
it not end up on the other side instead?
What would form pangea?All this is a free and trivial lookup, moron.
What pushes it apart against continental friction?
No. The continents formed where they are now in the beginning.
Where you born this stupid or is it brain damage that makes you so incredibly stupid?
instead of at Pangea. There is no push mechanism for Pangea.
How could the friction be overcome? and push in a
preferred direction alone? If Pangea is still pushed now will
it not end up on the other side instead?
Mitchell Raemsch
On Sunday, August 13, 2023 at 9:46:10 AM UTC-7, Jim Pennino wrote:
mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchr...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sunday, August 13, 2023 at 8:46:10 AM UTC-7, Jim Pennino wrote:All this is a free and trivial lookup, moron.
mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchr...@gmail.com> wrote:
instead of at Pangea. There is no push mechanism for Pangea.Typical idiotic moron babble.
How could the friction be overcome? and push in a
preferred direction alone? If Pangea is still pushed now will
it not end up on the other side instead?
What would form pangea?
What pushes it apart against continental friction?
No. The continents formed where they are now in the beginning.
Where you born this stupid or is it brain damage that makes you so
incredibly stupid?
What formed pangea? then what pushes that huge mass apart against its friction?
Each continent has a preferred direction of drift. So how does drift get that direction? if each continent is pushed in another direction?
On Sunday, August 13, 2023 at 11:19:50 AM UTC-4, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
instead of at Pangea. There is no push mechanism for Pangea.
How could the friction be overcome? and push in a
preferred direction alone? If Pangea is still pushed now will
it not end up on the other side instead?
Mitchell RaemschThe flow of heat from the radioactive interior causes slow moving currents within the Earth. Satellite laser range finders map the motion up and down and sideways with exquisite precision of points on the Earth.
Google "What causes the continents to move"
First hit, "The heat from radioactive processes within the planet's interior causes the plates to move, sometimes toward and sometimes away from each other. This movement is called plate motion, or tectonic shift."
You can believe in God and be a scientist at the same time.
Plates are too massive to be pushed.
On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 8:51:12 AM UTC-7, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
Plates are too massive to be pushed.Your supporting evidence for this claim is what, Mitch?
On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 10:20:18 AM UTC-7, Paul Alsing wrote:
On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 8:51:12 AM UTC-7, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
Plates are too massive to be pushed.Your supporting evidence for this claim is what, Mitch?
Its called weight that has too much friction...
What is your evidence they are not where they formed
at Earth's beginning paul?
On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 10:23:21 AM UTC-7, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 10:20:18 AM UTC-7, Paul Alsing wrote:
On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 8:51:12 AM UTC-7, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
Plates are too massive to be pushed.Your supporting evidence for this claim is what, Mitch?
Its called weight that has too much friction...That is not evidence, Mitch... that is just you making it up as you go along. You need to follow the Scientific Method...
What is your evidence they are not where they formed
at Earth's beginning paul?
"The scientific method is a process for objectively establishing facts through
testing and experimentation. It involves making observations, asking questions,
forming hypotheses, making predictions, conducting experiments, and analyzing results.
The scientific method is a standardized way of conducting research."
My own evidence , models that were constructed by the aforementioned process,
can be found in thousands of research papers and textbooks. you should read one of them.
Just because you cannot understand plate tectonics does not mean that the model is incorrect.
On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 10:20:18 AM UTC-7, Paul Alsing wrote:
On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 8:51:12 AM UTC-7, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote: >>
Plates are too massive to be pushed.Your supporting evidence for this claim is what, Mitch?
Its called weight that has too much friction...
On 8/14/2023 1:23 PM, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 10:20:18 AM UTC-7, Paul Alsing wrote:
On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 8:51:12 AM UTC-7, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
Plates are too massive to be pushed.Your supporting evidence for this claim is what, Mitch?
Its called weight that has too much friction...What is your evidence of this "weight that has too much friction"?
Besides, the friction would be with the mantle below which is moving, so
the plates would move because of their friction as well.
While Mitch is probably not allowed access to anything as hazardous as boiling water, here's a simple experiment to help visualize things.
Heat water in a pot until almost boiling but not actually boiling. You
may be able to see convection currents in the water since the heat comes from the bottom. Add some small pieces of something that floats on
water, flakes, wood chips, etc. The convection currents will cause the pieces to move around and form clumps "continents" floating on the water which may form a big clump or break up etc.
Where is that mantle movement measured now?
On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 5:31:37 PM UTC-7, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
Where is that mantle movement measured now?We all know that you are too challenged to look this up for yourself, Mitch...
https://www.thoughtco.com/measuring-plate-motion-1441107#:~:text=Geodesy%2C%20the%20science%20of%20measuring,per%20year%2C%20GPS%20can%20tell.
On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 6:53:19 PM UTC-7, Paul Alsing wrote:
On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 5:31:37 PM UTC-7, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
Where is that mantle movement measured now?We all know that you are too challenged to look this up for yourself, Mitch...
https://www.thoughtco.com/measuring-plate-motion-1441107#:~:text=Geodesy%2C%20the%20science%20of%20measuring,per%20year%2C%20GPS%20can%20tell.Plate is above the mantle. How does the mantle move?
Where did the plates start moving?
No. Plates were formed at the beginning where they are now.
If we measure anything it is coastal change and not
continental drift. They drift to the opposite side if they are still drifting now.
On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 6:53:19 PM UTC-7, Paul Alsing wrote:
On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 5:31:37 PM UTC-7, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote: >>
Where is that mantle movement measured now?We all know that you are too challenged to look this up for yourself, Mitch...
https://www.thoughtco.com/measuring-plate-motion-1441107#:~:text=Geodesy%2C%20the%20science%20of%20measuring,per%20year%2C%20GPS%20can%20tell.
Plate is above the mantle. How does the mantle move?
On 8/14/2023 10:28 PM, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 6:53:19 PM UTC-7, Paul Alsing wrote:
On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 5:31:37 PM UTC-7, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
Where is that mantle movement measured now?We all know that you are too challenged to look this up for yourself, Mitch...
https://www.thoughtco.com/measuring-plate-motion-1441107#:~:text=Geodesy%2C%20the%20science%20of%20measuring,per%20year%2C%20GPS%20can%20tell.
Plate is above the mantle. How does the mantle move?I already told you, Roy. Convection currents.
On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 11:14:24 PM UTC-7, Volney wrote:
On 8/14/2023 10:28 PM, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 6:53:19 PM UTC-7, Paul Alsing wrote:I already told you, Roy. Convection currents.
On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 5:31:37 PM UTC-7, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
Where is that mantle movement measured now?We all know that you are too challenged to look this up for yourself, Mitch...
https://www.thoughtco.com/measuring-plate-motion-1441107#:~:text=Geodesy%2C%20the%20science%20of%20measuring,per%20year%2C%20GPS%20can%20tell.
Plate is above the mantle. How does the mantle move?
But the plate mass is too big.
On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 11:14:24 PM UTC-7, Volney wrote:
On 8/14/2023 10:28 PM, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 6:53:19 PM UTC-7, Paul Alsing wrote:I already told you, Roy. Convection currents.
On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 5:31:37 PM UTC-7, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
Where is that mantle movement measured now?We all know that you are too challenged to look this up for yourself, Mitch...
https://www.thoughtco.com/measuring-plate-motion-1441107#:~:text=Geodesy%2C%20the%20science%20of%20measuring,per%20year%2C%20GPS%20can%20tell.
Plate is above the mantle. How does the mantle move?
But the plate mass is too big.
On Sunday, August 13, 2023 at 4:01:16 PM UTC-7, Andy Everett wrote:
On Sunday, August 13, 2023 at 11:19:50 AM UTC-4, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
instead of at Pangea. There is no push mechanism for Pangea.
How could the friction be overcome? and push in a
preferred direction alone? If Pangea is still pushed now will
it not end up on the other side instead?
Mitchell RaemschThe flow of heat from the radioactive interior causes slow moving currents within the Earth. Satellite laser range finders map the motion up and down and sideways with exquisite precision of points on the Earth.
Google "What causes the continents to move"Plates are too massive to be pushed. Instead
they formed where they are at the Earth's very beginning.
That's right Andy.You can believe in God and be a scientist at the same time.
On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 12:05:30 PM UTC-7, Paul Alsing wrote:
On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 10:23:21 AM UTC-7, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 10:20:18 AM UTC-7, Paul Alsing wrote:
On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 8:51:12 AM UTC-7, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
Plates are too massive to be pushed.Your supporting evidence for this claim is what, Mitch?
Its called weight that has too much friction...
What is your evidence they are not where they formed
at Earth's beginning paul?
That is not evidence, Mitch... that is just you making it up as you go along. You need to follow the Scientific Method...
"The scientific method is a process for objectively establishing facts throughIt is mostly biased to get the result it wants. That is: science is wrong.
testing and experimentation. It involves making observations, asking questions,
The liar lies and it is science. not me.
forming hypotheses, making predictions, conducting experiments, and analyzing results.
The scientific method is a standardized way of conducting research."
My own evidence , models that were constructed by the aforementioned process,
can be found in thousands of research papers and textbooks. you should read one of them.
Just because you cannot understand plate tectonics does not mean that the model is incorrect.The scientific method can be used in the negative. Science can be loaded to get the desired result it wants.
Everything can be abused. And the scientific method is collecting data that only
gives a statistical or average result instead of accuracy of any kind. Just as quantum mechanics
demonstrates uncertainty in all measurements. The scientific method has the same limit
in its measurements as the QM central principle does.
On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 3:39:40 PM UTC-4, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 12:05:30 PM UTC-7, Paul Alsing wrote:
On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 10:23:21 AM UTC-7, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 10:20:18 AM UTC-7, Paul Alsing wrote:
On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 8:51:12 AM UTC-7, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
Plates are too massive to be pushed.Your supporting evidence for this claim is what, Mitch?
Measuring the speed they are moving now, as Andy already told you.Its called weight that has too much friction...
What is your evidence they are not where they formed
at Earth's beginning paul?
As for too much friction, you do know that the plates float on a liquid. There is a little thing called Newton's laws of motion. The continents basically have always been in motion. And they will keep moving for quite
a while because of the relatively low friction of the magma they ride on
and in addition there are the magma currents
That is not evidence, Mitch... that is just you making it up as you go along. You need to follow the Scientific Method...
Translation of Michell's statement: "Boo Hoo. the facts don't fit my theories!""The scientific method is a process for objectively establishing facts throughIt is mostly biased to get the result it wants. That is: science is wrong.
testing and experimentation. It involves making observations, asking questions,
The liar lies and it is science. not me.You are just misguided. Or you are a lying troll. Take your pick, Michell.
forming hypotheses, making predictions, conducting experiments, and analyzing results.
The scientific method is a standardized way of conducting research."
My own evidence , models that were constructed by the aforementioned process,
can be found in thousands of research papers and textbooks. you should read one of them.
No, that's why research is published so others can make the measurementsJust because you cannot understand plate tectonics does not mean that the model is incorrect.The scientific method can be used in the negative. Science can be loaded to get the desired result it wants.
and find any errors. The measurements of plate movement have been repeated often and confirms the plates to be moving.
Just repeating your belief is not proof or contradiction of current knowledge.
Everything can be abused. And the scientific method is collecting data that onlyYou've never done a science experiment have you Michell?
gives a statistical or average result instead of accuracy of any kind. Just as quantum mechanics
demonstrates uncertainty in all measurements. The scientific method has the same limit
in its measurements as the QM central principle does.
The measurements are very accurate, but more importantly,
very repeatable. Show some measurements that the plates
are not moving then maybe you can have a case.
But then you would not be able to explain earthquakes,
Volcanoes, mountains, and more.
Enjoy,
Ed
Instead of drifting there is coastal change being measured.
On Tuesday, August 15, 2023 at 2:50:14 PM UTC-7, edpr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 3:39:40 PM UTC-4, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 12:05:30 PM UTC-7, Paul Alsing wrote:
On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 10:23:21 AM UTC-7, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 10:20:18 AM UTC-7, Paul Alsing wrote:
On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 8:51:12 AM UTC-7, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
Plates are too massive to be pushed.Your supporting evidence for this claim is what, Mitch?
Measuring the speed they are moving now, as Andy already told you.Its called weight that has too much friction...
What is your evidence they are not where they formed
at Earth's beginning paul?
As for too much friction, you do know that the plates float on a liquid. There is a little thing called Newton's laws of motion. The continents basically have always been in motion. And they will keep moving for quite a while because of the relatively low friction of the magma they ride on and in addition there are the magma currents
That is not evidence, Mitch... that is just you making it up as you go along. You need to follow the Scientific Method...
Translation of Michell's statement: "Boo Hoo. the facts don't fit my theories!""The scientific method is a process for objectively establishing facts throughIt is mostly biased to get the result it wants. That is: science is wrong.
testing and experimentation. It involves making observations, asking questions,
The liar lies and it is science. not me.You are just misguided. Or you are a lying troll. Take your pick, Michell.
forming hypotheses, making predictions, conducting experiments, and analyzing results.
The scientific method is a standardized way of conducting research."
My own evidence , models that were constructed by the aforementioned process,
can be found in thousands of research papers and textbooks. you should read one of them.
No, that's why research is published so others can make the measurements and find any errors. The measurements of plate movement have been repeated often and confirms the plates to be moving.Just because you cannot understand plate tectonics does not mean that the model is incorrect.The scientific method can be used in the negative. Science can be loaded to get the desired result it wants.
Just repeating your belief is not proof or contradiction of current knowledge.
Everything can be abused. And the scientific method is collecting data that onlyYou've never done a science experiment have you Michell?
gives a statistical or average result instead of accuracy of any kind. Just as quantum mechanics
demonstrates uncertainty in all measurements. The scientific method has the same limit
in its measurements as the QM central principle does.
The measurements are very accurate, but more importantly,
very repeatable. Show some measurements that the plates
are not moving then maybe you can have a case.
But then you would not be able to explain earthquakes,
Volcanoes, mountains, and more.
Enjoy,There is a consequence to plates moving.
Ed
How did they start at Pangea? And why would
they move in their multiple different directions ed?
If they are measured to be won't they end up
on the other side?
No, They have never moved. They have always
been where they are.
Mitchell Raemsch
mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchr...@gmail.com> wrote:
<snip old crap>
Instead of drifting there is coastal change being measured.No, you blithering moron, there is both continent drift and coastal
change being measured.
On Wednesday, August 16, 2023 at 9:46:10 AM UTC-7, Jim Pennino wrote:
mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchr...@gmail.com> wrote:
<snip old crap>
Instead of drifting there is coastal change being measured.No, you blithering moron, there is both continent drift and coastal
change being measured.
What is the difference? They would be a mix.
No. Only one is real and that is not drift.
mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchr...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wednesday, August 16, 2023 at 9:46:10 AM UTC-7, Jim Pennino wrote:
mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchr...@gmail.com> wrote:
<snip old crap>
Instead of drifting there is coastal change being measured.No, you blithering moron, there is both continent drift and coastal
change being measured.
What is the difference? They would be a mix.
No. Only one is real and that is not drift.
On Wednesday, August 16, 2023 at 6:01:12 PM UTC-7, Jim Pennino wrote:
mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchr...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wednesday, August 16, 2023 at 9:46:10 AM UTC-7, Jim Pennino wrote:
mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchr...@gmail.com> wrote:
<snip old crap>
Instead of drifting there is coastal change being measured.No, you blithering moron, there is both continent drift and coastal
change being measured.
What is the difference? They would be a mix.
No. Only one is real and that is not drift.
Pangea didn't form only to unform...
Continents formed where they are now.
If they drift they will end up a jumble on the
other side....
If they drift they will end up a jumble on the
other side....
On 8/17/2023 1:49 PM, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
If they drift they will end up a jumble on theWhich they surely will, Roy. Call it New Pangaea or NewPangaea if you
other side....
wish. And even later it, too, will break up.
On Thursday, August 17, 2023 at 4:27:48 PM UTC-7, Volney wrote:
On 8/17/2023 1:49 PM, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
If they drift they will end up a jumble on theWhich they surely will, Roy. Call it New Pangaea or NewPangaea if you
other side....
wish. And even later it, too, will break up.
How are the different continents pushed apart in several directions?
by the same push source? No. That does not even exist.
That push would have to be in multiple directions.
How does one source of push give many different directions?
They have never been pushed. They formed at the beginning instead.
Coastal change has always existed. Not a special push...
mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchr...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, August 17, 2023 at 4:27:48 PM UTC-7, Volney wrote:
On 8/17/2023 1:49 PM, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
If they drift they will end up a jumble on theWhich they surely will, Roy. Call it New Pangaea or NewPangaea if you
other side....
wish. And even later it, too, will break up.
How are the different continents pushed apart in several directions?How did you get to be so blazingly stupid?
by the same push source? No. That does not even exist.
That push would have to be in multiple directions.
How does one source of push give many different directions?
They have never been pushed. They formed at the beginning instead.
Coastal change has always existed. Not a special push...
On Thursday, August 17, 2023 at 4:27:48 PM UTC-7, Volney wrote:
On 8/17/2023 1:49 PM, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
If they drift they will end up a jumble on theWhich they surely will, Roy. Call it New Pangaea or NewPangaea if you
other side....
wish. And even later it, too, will break up.
How are the different continents pushed apart in several directions?
by the same push source? No.
That push would have to be in multiple directions.
How does one source of push give many different directions?
On Thursday, August 17, 2023 at 7:46:20 PM UTC-7, Jim Pennino wrote:
mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchr...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, August 17, 2023 at 4:27:48 PM UTC-7, Volney wrote:How did you get to be so blazingly stupid?
On 8/17/2023 1:49 PM, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
If they drift they will end up a jumble on theWhich they surely will, Roy. Call it New Pangaea or NewPangaea if you
other side....
wish. And even later it, too, will break up.
How are the different continents pushed apart in several directions?
by the same push source? No. That does not even exist.
That push would have to be in multiple directions.
How does one source of push give many different directions?
They have never been pushed. They formed at the beginning instead.
Coastal change has always existed. Not a special push...
You are a parrot jim. Stop following me around.
That is what is stupid.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 300 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 105:48:17 |
| Calls: | 6,700 |
| Files: | 12,232 |
| Messages: | 5,350,363 |