On 07-Aug-23 11:56 pm, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
On Monday, 7 August 2023 at 15:07:17 UTC+10, Arindam Banerjee wrote:From mini black holes filled with neutrinos tied by strings made up of quarks????
https://www.facebook.com/arindam.banerjee.31149359/videos/1028532314980688 >>
rotfl4pita. Arindam Banerjee
"On 4th July 2023. The same demonstration of my new design rail gun
from another camera. My smartphone actually what I am holding now.
The force on the bullet accelerating it was 13.44 Newtons and the
reaction caused by rolling on the rails, making the gun go backward
was 11.62 Newtons. The momentum of the armature just as it left the
rails after being there for 470 msec was 6.337 Kg m/s and the
momentum of the gun was 5.463 Kg m/s. Very inefficient. As per my new
rail gun theory the so-called Lorentz force on the armature is 34
Newtons. Welding has reduced it to the lesser value and pushback by
rolling and sparking has created the recoil force. When the gun
slides smoothly with no welds the whole force and momentum will go
the armature. I will see what I can do about that. Now it so happens
that influential pro establishment physics entities have held that
the slope of the floor of my shed is so inclined that the armature
rolls down by gravity after being pushed by my hand. "
Why wouldn't there also be a Lorentz force on the gun, due to the
magnetic field created by the current through the armature, acting on
the current going through the gun?
Why wouldn't the force on the armature and the force on the gun be equal
and opposite?
Sylvia.
On Wednesday, 9 August 2023 at 20:06:23 UTC+10, Sylvia Else wrote:conductor. In my experiment some 5000 Amps is going through the heavy cylindrical armature. That is enough to give it the amount of force required for such acceleration. See the figures. The momentum of muzzle was 6.337 Kg m/s seond which is giving a 6.
On 07-Aug-23 11:56 pm, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
On Monday, 7 August 2023 at 15:07:17 UTC+10, Arindam Banerjee wrote:From mini black holes filled with neutrinos tied by strings made up of quarks????
https://www.facebook.com/arindam.banerjee.31149359/videos/1028532314980688
rotfl4pita. Arindam Banerjee
"On 4th July 2023. The same demonstration of my new design rail gun
from another camera. My smartphone actually what I am holding now.
The force on the bullet accelerating it was 13.44 Newtons and the reaction caused by rolling on the rails, making the gun go backward
was 11.62 Newtons. The momentum of the armature just as it left the rails after being there for 470 msec was 6.337 Kg m/s and the
momentum of the gun was 5.463 Kg m/s. Very inefficient. As per my new rail gun theory the so-called Lorentz force on the armature is 34 Newtons. Welding has reduced it to the lesser value and pushback by rolling and sparking has created the recoil force. When the gun
slides smoothly with no welds the whole force and momentum will go
the armature. I will see what I can do about that. Now it so happens that influential pro establishment physics entities have held that
the slope of the floor of my shed is so inclined that the armature
rolls down by gravity after being pushed by my hand. "
Why wouldn't there also be a Lorentz force on the gun, due to the
magnetic field created by the current through the armature, acting on
the current going through the gun?
There is that, true. All rail guns work with very large currents that create a huge magnetic field - the same current going through that field experiences a linear force in the rail gun configuration where the same current goes through the moving
Mind, my gun has a much higher design force capability than the rail guns on display by the US Navy. Besides, their formula is wrong.
interstellar spacecraft, and many explanations of natural phenomena.Why wouldn't the force on the armature and the force on the gun be equal and opposite?
Simply speaking, that is the way the universe works, as per Arindam's finding, and expressed with his physics aphorisms.
To get into a bit more detail:
Because Maxwellian electrodynamics reduces to the formula F = B i L and to that there is no reaction predicted, implying the violation of inertia and from there to "flying carpet" physics and technology, following my formula e=0.5mVVN(N-k) for
The rail gun motor is an invention that is based upon the violation of inertia with a particular configuration - the electromagnetic force accelerating the armature does not push the gun back. The gun is pushed by the forward action, which because ofthe rolling friction from the treadmill action, pushes back the gun - giving the impression of recoil. If it was sliding - say on mercury rails - the whole force would be going forward and it would be far more efficient, practically no recoil.
The earlier Newtonian-Amperian electrodynamics formula was F = f(i1, i2) which predicted an opposite reaction. The net force in the closed loop was zero, for the force from the opposing current conductor (i2) would negate the force from conductor i1.
In relativistic quantum stuff, energy is bundled, up, and progresses through a circuit much like water in a closed pipe with a compressor. So, no change of inertial state possible.
Yes, there would be an equal and opposite reaction if either Newtonian-Amperian or Einsteinian-Feynmain electrodynamics was correct, but experiment with my apparatus (a working model of a new design rail gun) shows such is not the case.
Which means that Maxwellian electrodynamics is correct and Einstein-Feynman relativistic quantum electrodynamics must wrong if there is no equal or opposite reaction.
As there is no equal and opposite reaction, shown many times with my experiments, the latter is wrong and the former is right.
That means, aether is back in business.
Quantum theory must be discarded on correctness grounds, but may still have use for certain purposes. Like flat earth theory is okay for flat maps, for taxi cabs, not pilots.
***Now, Roachie, where are you, wu bist du? Did my falling armature crush you, poor roach! Alas. ***
Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee
Sylvia.
On 09-Aug-23 8:41 pm, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
Yes, there would be an equal and opposite reaction if either Newtonian-Amperian or Einsteinian-Feynmain electrodynamics wasYour video clearly shows that when an effort is made to reduce friction,
correct, but experiment with my apparatus (a working model of a new
design rail gun) shows such is not the case.
the two parts of the system move in opposite directions.
exactly what would be expected from both the theory of electromagnetism,
and from the law of conservation of momentum, you have offered nothing new.
On Wednesday, 9 August 2023 at 20:06:23 UTC+10, Sylvia Else wrote:conductor. In my experiment some 5000 Amps is going through the heavy cylindrical armature. That is enough to give it the amount of force required for such acceleration. See the figures. The momentum of muzzle was 6.337 Kg m/s seond which is giving a 6.
On 07-Aug-23 11:56 pm, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
On Monday, 7 August 2023 at 15:07:17 UTC+10, Arindam Banerjee wrote:From mini black holes filled with neutrinos tied by strings made up of quarks????
https://www.facebook.com/arindam.banerjee.31149359/videos/1028532314980688
rotfl4pita. Arindam Banerjee
"On 4th July 2023. The same demonstration of my new design rail gun
from another camera. My smartphone actually what I am holding now.
The force on the bullet accelerating it was 13.44 Newtons and the reaction caused by rolling on the rails, making the gun go backward
was 11.62 Newtons. The momentum of the armature just as it left the rails after being there for 470 msec was 6.337 Kg m/s and the
momentum of the gun was 5.463 Kg m/s. Very inefficient. As per my new rail gun theory the so-called Lorentz force on the armature is 34 Newtons. Welding has reduced it to the lesser value and pushback by rolling and sparking has created the recoil force. When the gun
slides smoothly with no welds the whole force and momentum will go
the armature. I will see what I can do about that. Now it so happens that influential pro establishment physics entities have held that
the slope of the floor of my shed is so inclined that the armature
rolls down by gravity after being pushed by my hand. "
Why wouldn't there also be a Lorentz force on the gun, due to the
magnetic field created by the current through the armature, acting on
the current going through the gun?
There is that, true. All rail guns work with very large currents that create a huge magnetic field - the same current going through that field experiences a linear force in the rail gun configuration where the same current goes through the moving
Mind, my gun has a much higher design force capability than the rail guns on display by the US Navy. Besides, their formula is wrong.
interstellar spacecraft, and many explanations of natural phenomena.Why wouldn't the force on the armature and the force on the gun be equal and opposite?
Simply speaking, that is the way the universe works, as per Arindam's finding, and expressed with his physics aphorisms.
To get into a bit more detail:
Because Maxwellian electrodynamics reduces to the formula F = B i L and to that there is no reaction predicted, implying the violation of inertia and from there to "flying carpet" physics and technology, following my formula e=0.5mVVN(N-k) for
The rail gun motor is an invention that is based upon the violation of inertia with a particular configuration - the electromagnetic force accelerating the armature does not push the gun back. The gun is pushed by the forward action, which because ofthe rolling friction from the treadmill action, pushes back the gun - giving the impression of recoil. If it was sliding - say on mercury rails - the whole force would be going forward and it would be far more efficient, practically no recoil.
The earlier Newtonian-Amperian electrodynamics formula was F = f(i1, i2) which predicted an opposite reaction. The net force in the closed loop was zero, for the force from the opposing current conductor (i2) would negate the force from conductor i1.
In relativistic quantum stuff, energy is bundled, up, and progresses through a circuit much like water in a closed pipe with a compressor. So, no change of inertial state possible.
Yes, there would be an equal and opposite reaction if either Newtonian-Amperian or Einsteinian-Feynmain electrodynamics was correct, but experiment with my apparatus (a working model of a new design rail gun) shows such is not the case.
Which means that Maxwellian electrodynamics is correct and Einstein-Feynman relativistic quantum electrodynamics must wrong if there is no equal or opposite reaction.
As there is no equal and opposite reaction, shown many times with my experiments, the latter is wrong and the former is right.
That means, aether is back in business.
Quantum theory must be discarded on correctness grounds, but may still have use for certain purposes. Like flat earth theory is okay for flat maps, for taxi cabs, not pilots.
***Now, Roachie, where are you, wu bist du? Did my falling armature crush you, poor roach! Alas. ***
Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee
Sylvia.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 300 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 102:07:43 |
| Calls: | 6,700 |
| Files: | 12,232 |
| Messages: | 5,350,044 |