Now I suspect both of these science shams came about the same time in history.physics. But the engineering community kept its eyes open for it to have mystical-engineering. Is not the Lotus position a Middle Two Thirds, and why I have leg cramps in bed in the morning is that my legs are the outer 1/3 portion, with all the torsion
Both are mysticism from the East. "Three quarks for Muster Mark". The Buddha's Noble Eightfold Path and the Threefold Way.
So there was Murray Gell-Mann playing around in math algebra and wanting to be famous, so he takes Eastern mysticism, spiritualism and invents some silly 3 quarks.
So along comes Murray Gell-Mann and George Zweig with their Numerology of Physics-- shame the Internet was not around by 1960 to give these two knuckleheads a thorough thrashing instead of a Nobel prize in con art physics.
But we look to Engineering by 1960 if there was a burgeoning birth of the ridiculous Engineering Middle Third Rule. For it was a horse race between physics con-artists and for the engineers not to be outdone.
Principles of Foundation Engineering by B.M.Das, 1995. So the engineers were late in pandering Eastern mysticism into engineering. For Gell-Mann and Zweig, then Sheldon Glashow were well on their way of filling physics with numerology and mystic-
So, never say that Physics is without Numerology, for some of the very greatest physics con-artists finagled the Swede prize for sheer nonsense of number 3, --- Quarks, the gutter sewer cesspool of physics history in the 20th century.eightfold way and middle third.
And here, just a day ago I was asking for physicists to enter into engineering teaching and straighten out the engineers, when the reverse flow is more apt-- have the engineers straighten out the fools of physics with their mindless quarks and 3 and
So, well, what we need is someone in science to build two structures that full demonstrates how Middle Third of Engineering is superior to a structure that falls apart due to not being built Middle Third Rule. Demonstration is after all-- Experiment ofPhysics.
Stop this nonsense of tension and stress-- but build the actual two models that shows what Middle Third Rule means.
AP
Connecting Gell-Mann's fake physics of quarks with Engineering's fakery Middle Third Rule.
I do recall some of Feynman history concerning his opinion of Standard Model in Physics. His comment, words to the effect "I see no use in playing Algebra games in Physics" referring to the Standard Model.function, and where these Standard Model physicists play around with numbers in a algebra jigsaw puzzle.
Critics of AP often level that attack on AP-- my work is numerology. Yet, those same critics never see anything wrong in Murray Gell-Mann, Sheldon Glashow, Peter Higgs, Steven Weinberg with their protons, neutrons, electrons as "balls" that have no
Contrast that with AP's New Physics where the proton is 840MeV as a torus with 840 windings and inside the torus resides a 105MeV muon as the Atom's electron doing the Faraday law inside the proton torus as it thrusts through the torus at nearly thespeed of light producing electricity for which the neutrons are parallel plate capacitors storing this electricity.
So Old Physics with Murray Gell-Mann was algebra games and 3 quarks with balls as particles that do nothing except maybe fly around in circles around a dense nucleus of balls that do nothing. A picture really quite childish and stupid, yet they win aNobel physics prize for this stupidity. Prizes for numerology in physics.
And this was circa 1960s of numerology of 3 in physics, but the Engineers in 1960s were paying attention to this horrible numerology in physics that wins prizes, and not to be left out of the party-making. The engineers reflected on whether 3, thenumber 3 was also a backbone and foundation of sorts in engineering. And the engineers did not have far to look to see of 0 to 1/3 and 1/3 to 2/3, and 2/3 to 1, makes for a Middle Thirds.
And the Eastern Religions of Buddhism with Eightfold Way and Middle Third Path was not lost on engineers in the 1960s onward. And so it came to be, that Physics was seeped in the stupidity of numerology and engineering would want some of that party andmerriment.
But, what is flawed with both the physics and engineering numerology of 3, is the fact that truth in science ends up with Experiments. And Demonstrations are indeed experiments.monopoles to have jobs and tasks and function, and not be a mindless idiotic ball that does nothing and is counted in some number algebra game.
AP's recent experimentation into proving Water is H4O, not H2O is an experiment that throws out the Standard Model of Old Physics, completely throws it out and onto the trash pile of shame. For H4O requires proton and muon and neutron and magnetic
And as for the Engineering mindrot of Middle Third Rule, a demonstration is required. A demonstration is demanded, not just a paragraph of words with tension and stress and resultant force, a incomprehensible paragraph. No, a demonstration of somethingfollowing the Middle Third Rule and another apparatus that fails the Middle Third Rule. Then, when someone asks, what is the Engineering Middle Third Rule? What is it? And the answer is-- you make apparatus A and apparatus B that does not follow the rule.
Sadly, though, numerology crept into physics and engineering in the 20th century, was heavily rewarded, but now must be seen as the charaltan of science it was.active and vocal.
It is admirable that Feynman was opposed to the Standard Model, but he should have been more vehement in his opposition. Every King or Queen of science must be vocal in the future. And sometimes the King or Queen will get it wrong, but they must be
AP, King of Science
wtorek, 1 sierpnia 2023 o 09:55:56 UTC+2 Archimedes Plutonium napisał(a):function, and where these Standard Model physicists play around with numbers in a algebra jigsaw puzzle.
I do recall some of Feynman history concerning his opinion of Standard Model in Physics. His comment, words to the effect "I see no use in playing Algebra games in Physics" referring to the Standard Model.
Critics of AP often level that attack on AP-- my work is numerology. Yet, those same critics never see anything wrong in Murray Gell-Mann, Sheldon Glashow, Peter Higgs, Steven Weinberg with their protons, neutrons, electrons as "balls" that have no
speed of light producing electricity for which the neutrons are parallel plate capacitors storing this electricity.Contrast that with AP's New Physics where the proton is 840MeV as a torus with 840 windings and inside the torus resides a 105MeV muon as the Atom's electron doing the Faraday law inside the proton torus as it thrusts through the torus at nearly the
Nobel physics prize for this stupidity. Prizes for numerology in physics.So Old Physics with Murray Gell-Mann was algebra games and 3 quarks with balls as particles that do nothing except maybe fly around in circles around a dense nucleus of balls that do nothing. A picture really quite childish and stupid, yet they win a
number 3 was also a backbone and foundation of sorts in engineering. And the engineers did not have far to look to see of 0 to 1/3 and 1/3 to 2/3, and 2/3 to 1, makes for a Middle Thirds.And this was circa 1960s of numerology of 3 in physics, but the Engineers in 1960s were paying attention to this horrible numerology in physics that wins prizes, and not to be left out of the party-making. The engineers reflected on whether 3, the
and merriment.And the Eastern Religions of Buddhism with Eightfold Way and Middle Third Path was not lost on engineers in the 1960s onward. And so it came to be, that Physics was seeped in the stupidity of numerology and engineering would want some of that party
monopoles to have jobs and tasks and function, and not be a mindless idiotic ball that does nothing and is counted in some number algebra game.But, what is flawed with both the physics and engineering numerology of 3, is the fact that truth in science ends up with Experiments. And Demonstrations are indeed experiments.
AP's recent experimentation into proving Water is H4O, not H2O is an experiment that throws out the Standard Model of Old Physics, completely throws it out and onto the trash pile of shame. For H4O requires proton and muon and neutron and magnetic
something following the Middle Third Rule and another apparatus that fails the Middle Third Rule. Then, when someone asks, what is the Engineering Middle Third Rule? What is it? And the answer is-- you make apparatus A and apparatus B that does notAnd as for the Engineering mindrot of Middle Third Rule, a demonstration is required. A demonstration is demanded, not just a paragraph of words with tension and stress and resultant force, a incomprehensible paragraph. No, a demonstration of
One experimental set is enough (previously described) - a cuboid pole made of cuboid rubber bands stacked on top of each other and a match at the very top transmitting the load/force.active and vocal.
Sadly, though, numerology crept into physics and engineering in the 20th century, was heavily rewarded, but now must be seen as the charaltan of science it was.
It is admirable that Feynman was opposed to the Standard Model, but he should have been more vehement in his opposition. Every King or Queen of science must be vocal in the future. And sometimes the King or Queen will get it wrong, but they must be
PARTON for the nucleon component. Quarks were to fulfill this role until a better structure model was found.AP, King of Science
I think Feynman compromised because there was no alternative model for the structure of the nucleon. He was familiar with experiments with fast electrons passing through a proton and being scattered (as in Rutherford's experiment) and reserved the name
There are probably over 7,300 partons in nucleons (hence the multitude of different particles after collisions). Partons are about the size of an electron and are about a million times as far apart. They easily pass the test of fast electrons (whichare made up of at least 4 partons)...probably.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 300 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 99:14:41 |
Calls: | 6,700 |
Calls today: | 5 |
Files: | 12,232 |
Messages: | 5,349,606 |