238th book of science for AP // Proving the Principle of Maximum Electricity Production is done by Atoms
76 views
Subscribe

Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
Mar 18, 2023, 10:02:09 AM

So many times I have referred to this principle in my work. Yet I never proved it true. I think it is
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
Mar 18, 2023, 11:21:39 PM

Alright I need some math data to understand why Maximum Electricity production relates directly to
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
Mar 18, 2023, 11:42:18 PM

Now looking at the unique features of the Torus. Source StackExchange: The torus is the only surface
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
Mar 19, 2023, 2:38:02 PM

Now the speed of measured Alpha particles from decay is in the range of 5 to 7 percent the speed of
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
Mar 19, 2023, 11:51:08 PM

Recently I caught myself writing a trio of books in astronomy, starting with the concept of Stepping
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
Mar 20, 2023, 2:27:00 AM

Alright, I think I have the proof that the torus is the geometry figure of Maximum Electricity
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
Apr 23, 2023, 2:14:10 PM (12 days ago)

Alright, onto my 238th book of science. I have often mentioned this principle in my physics work.
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
Apr 23, 2023, 5:06:17 PM (12 days ago)

I suspect the Maximum Electricity Principle is the reverse of Least Action or Least Energy principle,
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
Apr 27, 2023, 11:27:21 PM (7 days ago)

I need a full book on Maximum Electricity Production Principle in order to say the S, P, D, F
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
Apr 28, 2023, 9:24:25 AM (7 days ago)

I am going to try for 2 different methods of proof of Maximum Electricity Production. One method is
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
Apr 28, 2023, 12:06:03 PM (7 days ago)

On Friday, April 28, 2023 at 9:23:19 AM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: > I am going to try for
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
Apr 28, 2023, 9:32:30 PM (6 days ago)

Alright, I am not going to have any problems with figuring out the geometry inside of Atoms, for I
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
Apr 28, 2023, 11:20:05 PM (6 days ago)

On Friday, April 28, 2023 at 9:30:14 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: > Alright, I am not
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
Apr 29, 2023, 5:57:07 AM (6 days ago)

On Friday, April 28, 2023 at 11:19:34 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: > On Friday, April 28,
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
Apr 29, 2023, 4:09:32 PM (6 days ago)

Now this total overhaul of the geometry of the interior of all Atoms is going to make me say that the
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
Apr 29, 2023, 11:57:22 PM (5 days ago)

On Saturday, April 29, 2023 at 5:56:34 AM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: > Copper is 1s-2, 2s-
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
Apr 30, 2023, 1:14:04 AM (5 days ago)

Now here I have to stop for a moment and worry and wonder of a factor in efficiency. The worry is
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
Apr 30, 2023, 8:54:33 AM (5 days ago)

So I ask the question again is there a mathematics easy way of computing that 50 for copper, rather
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
Apr 30, 2023, 3:25:25 PM (5 days ago)

So I am intrigued here because I am making the case that photons and neutrinos from dipoles. That a
Message has been deleted
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
Apr 30, 2023, 8:20:27 PM (5 days ago)

Alright this leads directly into the idea that the composition of the Proton as a 840MeV torus and
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
Apr 30, 2023, 11:33:15 PM (4 days ago)

On Sunday, April 30, 2023 at 8:16:55 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: > Alright this leads
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
May 1, 2023, 7:39:22 AM (4 days ago)

Alright, this is becoming extremely interesting. I have the world divided between either a Transverse
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
May 1, 2023, 1:07:26 PM (4 days ago)

I am looking on how to recover a Semicircle wave in the manner that a cycloid wave is constructed.
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
May 1, 2023, 1:48:32 PM (4 days ago)

Alright, some good signs in all of this mess. I am looking for rolling of closed curves that recovers
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
May 1, 2023, 2:00:38 PM (4 days ago)

Now looking at the Limacon, if we stipulate that the offcenter point has to always be as a
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
May 1, 2023, 7:28:19 PM (4 days ago)

On Monday, May 1, 2023 at 1:02:23 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: > I am looking on how to
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
May 1, 2023, 9:53:05 PM (3 days ago)

So, well, Wikipedia has a animation of a Limacon and the Convex Limacon is almost a circle but a part
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
May 1, 2023, 10:57:40 PM (3 days ago)

Now I am going to go contrary to the description of the Dimpled Limacon and say that the Pointer-
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
May 1, 2023, 11:23:28 PM (3 days ago)

Now I am pretty sure this is a flaw in Old Math Geometry of their Limacon pointer marker going around
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
May 2, 2023, 7:45:23 AM (3 days ago)

On Monday, May 1, 2023 at 11:23:28 PM UTC-5 Archimedes Plutonium wrote: Now I am pretty sure this is
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
May 2, 2023, 3:23:05 PM (3 days ago)

Alright, good on MathStackExchange for they have something on cycloid rolling. Titled "Cycloid
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
May 2, 2023, 5:59:55 PM (3 days ago)

Major, major Geometry in Motion discovery by Archimedes Plutonium. I discovered this in this writing
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
May 2, 2023, 6:15:44 PM (3 days ago)

Now I have a easy intuitive proof that I am correct the cycloid is actually a ellipse. Some geometers
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
May 2, 2023, 8:04:56 PM (3 days ago)

This makes sense that circle rolled on straightline is ellipse. Ellipse rolled on identical ellipse
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
May 2, 2023, 9:54:19 PM (2 days ago)

This deserves a new separate math book on the massive corrections and changes to Geometry in Motion.
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
May 3, 2023, 11:25:59 PM (yesterday)

Flaws and error in Old Math's Limacon, in Cycloid, and in ellipses rolling on identical ellipse--
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
May 4, 2023, 12:00:08 PM (yesterday)

Alright, I am onto a project I love doing, totally absorbed. So I get out my geometry wood blocks and
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
May 4, 2023, 5:35:17 PM (yesterday)

Alright, working on the 4 by 4 by 4 torus of wood blocks. So the 4 by 4 by 4 Cube is volume of 64
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
May 4, 2023, 8:39:35 PM (yesterday)

On Thursday, May 4, 2023 at 5:34:39 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: > Alright, working on
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
May 4, 2023, 9:53:28 PM (23 hours ago)

The 5 by 5 by 5 Cube. Volume = 125 SA = 6 x 25 = 150 5 by 5 by 5 torus (by removing 3 by 3 by 5
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
12:36 AM (20 hours ago)

Let me try another even numbered torus, the 6 by 6 by 6 torus. Usually 3 samples are good enough for
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
11:57 AM (9 hours ago)

So I am not getting nice results here. So I have a sliding down convergence of a sequence. The 3x3x3
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
12:42 PM (8 hours ago)

Let me try removing a 2 by 2 by 6 and see if the ratio fits better with the 2.212... On Friday, May 5
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
1:31 PM (8 hours ago)

Let me try the 7 by 7 by 7 Cube and removal for the donut hole of torus of 3 by 3 by 7. Volume of
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
2:23 PM (7 hours ago)

Now I am looking for a OEIS sequence 2.666... to 2.5 to 1.4 to 1.333... to 1.285.... that comes close
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
2:38 PM (6 hours ago)

Now I should reduce these to fractions to be more precise for the Sequence, and thus I have this to
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
2:46 PM (6 hours ago)

Yes, OEIS of A232808 appears to be the formula I am looking for in the sequence-- but perhaps
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com>
4:18 PM (5 hours ago)



to Plutonium Atom Universe
Now trying out this formula to see if any of my sequence is matched.

(8/3)^(2/3) = 1.922...
(5/2)^(2/3) = 1.842...
(7/5)^(2/3) = 1.251...
(4/3)^(2/3) = 1.211...
(9/7)^(2/3) = 1.182...

Cannot say any matches occurred. But it does inform me that I am looking for a similar type of formula.

Just playing around
(2.66)^0.94 = 2.5
(2.5)^0.4 = 1.4
(1.4)^0.9 = 1.33
(1.33)^0.9 = 1.25

Alright, apparently my formula would have exponent of 0.9 rather than 0.66...

AP, King of Science, especially Physics and Logic


Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com>
8:48 PM (18 minutes ago)



to Plutonium Atom Universe
Alright it has been arbitrary up to now as to what the size of the donut hole is. I can chose to remove 1 block from each tier or 4 blocks or 9 blocks from each tier. Arbitrary until now, for I remembered a recent book of mine that says the Proton torus
hole is 3 times the diameter of the cross section circle diameter.

That implies the first block torus of interest for me is the 10 by 10 by 10 where I can achieve a ratio of 6 by 6 by 10 inner blocks removed as donut hole and the cross section diameter by 2, so that 2 x 3.14.. is close to 6. And this is also going to
require me to have the blocks be 10 by 10 by 2 to look more like a torus than a cylinder.

So from now on I start with 10 by 10 by 2 rectangular box and I attempt to keep the donut hole diameter be approximately 3.14 times the diameter of cross section of torus diameter circle.

So for the 10 by 10 by 2, the donut hole is approx 6 by 6 by 2 of a 6 diameter while torus diameter is 2.


My 205th book of science.

Faraday Law is inverse projective-geometry of Coulomb-gravity Law//Physics-Math

by Archimedes Plutonium

Last revision was 24Nov2022. And this is AP's 205th published book of science.

Preface: This book discusses the symmetry of the 4 differential laws of Electromagnetic theory, the Faraday law, Ampere-Maxwell law, Coulomb-gravity law and the Transformer law. This book also dives into the numbers of importance of physics and math, the
1/137, the pi, the pi subtract 2.71... and much more.

Cover Picture: Is my iphone photograph of 840 windings of slinky toy to form a torus that is the proton torus of physics of its 840MeV with a muon stuck inside at 105MeV doing the Faraday law.

--- quoting from 205th book ---
A fabulous discovery of science physics.

Alright, curiosity in my lifetime has been indefatigable. I wanted to get a rough estimate of the donut hole of 840 windings so I bought 9 more slinky toys to combine with my 2 already owned ones. And I measured what a 840 winding torus donut hole was.
My torus of 840 windings has a donut hole diameter of 210 mm and has a slinky toy diameter of 65mm. That would be a total diameter of torus as 65 + 210 +65 = 340mm with the donut hole diameter 210mm.

Now I play with those numbers and see what becomes of them for the Conjectures I placed so far. The most important being the idea that 840 windings is the physical geometry of the Fine Structure Constant as a torus the produces Maximum Electricity in the
Faraday law.

Alright, well it is easy to see that 210/65 is 3.230... So I went back to the lab and measured again and it was actually 205mm to 65mm. That gives me 205/65 = 3.15 and compared to pi 3.15/3.14 is a 0.3% sigma error,