https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/nasa-study-helps-explain-limit-breaking-ultra-luminous-x-ray-sources?utm_source=iContact&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nasajpl&utm_content=daily20230406-2versa. This is exactly how the scientific method is supposed to work.
"These objects are more than 100 times brighter than they should be. Observations by the agency’s NuSTAR X-ray telescope support a possible solution to this puzzle."
Pretty interesting article. It demonstates just how the scientific method works. When observations indicate that a theory might not be correct, scientists move to modify the theory. The goal is always to make the observations match the theory and vice-
On Thursday, April 6, 2023 at 5:06:05 PM UTC-7, Paul Alsing wrote:vice-versa. This is exactly how the scientific method is supposed to work.
https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/nasa-study-helps-explain-limit-breaking-ultra-luminous-x-ray-sources?utm_source=iContact&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nasajpl&utm_content=daily20230406-2
"These objects are more than 100 times brighter than they should be. Observations by the agency’s NuSTAR X-ray telescope support a possible solution to this puzzle."
Pretty interesting article. It demonstates just how the scientific method works. When observations indicate that a theory might not be correct, scientists move to modify the theory. The goal is always to make the observations match the theory and
Remember where their JW telescope fell back.
They have a new Moon hoax on their hands...
They were ready for both.
On Thursday, April 6, 2023 at 5:06:05 PM UTC-7, Paul Alsing wrote:versa. This is exactly how the scientific method is supposed to work.
https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/nasa-study-helps-explain-limit-breaking-ultra-luminous-x-ray-sources?utm_source=iContact&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nasajpl&utm_content=daily20230406-2
"These objects are more than 100 times brighter than they should be. Observations by the agency’s NuSTAR X-ray telescope support a possible solution to this puzzle."
Pretty interesting article. It demonstates just how the scientific method works. When observations indicate that a theory might not be correct, scientists move to modify the theory. The goal is always to make the observations match the theory and vice-
Remember where their JW telescope fell back.
They have a new Moon hoax on their hands...
They were ready for both.
Mitchell Raemsch
On Thursday, April 6, 2023 at 5:12:52 PM UTC-7, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:vice-versa. This is exactly how the scientific method is supposed to work.
On Thursday, April 6, 2023 at 5:06:05 PM UTC-7, Paul Alsing wrote:
https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/nasa-study-helps-explain-limit-breaking-ultra-luminous-x-ray-sources?utm_source=iContact&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nasajpl&utm_content=daily20230406-2
"These objects are more than 100 times brighter than they should be. Observations by the agency’s NuSTAR X-ray telescope support a possible solution to this puzzle."
Pretty interesting article. It demonstates just how the scientific method works. When observations indicate that a theory might not be correct, scientists move to modify the theory. The goal is always to make the observations match the theory and
253BNiXR27-FXREEaM%252Cl7ZZGnUTLaOXHM%252C_%253Bj3dQhmnPYB_XIM%252CKypkrQYyVD0ciM%252C_%253BbupKCX3mohP6FM%252CJHZumtmNzsVcpM%252C_%253Bpgb6FVkrZ7NjiM%252CfkTxCffpM_1KWM%252C_%253Bmbs74Ql6Tdnn-M%252CVFDGfwK-LXG84M%252C_%253BoprGCDW-baw9gM%252CM7jqoshP-Remember where their JW telescope fell back.No, Mitch, I do not remember that. No one except for you remembers that. It never happened. Haven't you been enjoying all of the photos being released by the Webb telescope?
https://www.google.com/search?rlz=1C1GTPM_enUS1017US1018&sxsrf=APwXEddhFcqFUvR1nKJVAcdpT0QeDf8W-w:1680826759424&q=webb+telescope+photos&tbm=isch&source=univ&fir=opu_aAFyGA4FjM%252C1IDtpk7YYMUWOM%252C_%253BRHWbtThIqZFPGM%252CiCPymSlzdNAmGM%252C_%
Get back on you regular meds, Mitch, whatever you are doing now is definitely not working...
They have a new Moon hoax on their hands...Just who is "they", Mitch? Those boogiemen you see in your dreams?
They were ready for both.
They are the same people inside NASA that prepared the Moon hoax
https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/nasa-study-helps-explain-limit-breaking-ultra-luminous-x-ray-sources?utm_source=iContact&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nasajpl&utm_content=daily20230406-2versa. This is exactly how the scientific method is supposed to work.
"These objects are more than 100 times brighter than they should be. Observations by the agency’s NuSTAR X-ray telescope support a possible solution to this puzzle."
Pretty interesting article. It demonstates just how the scientific method works. When observations indicate that a theory might not be correct, scientists move to modify the theory. The goal is always to make the observations match the theory and vice-
vice-versa. This is exactly how the scientific method is supposed to work.https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/nasa-study-helps-explain-limit-breaking-ultra-luminous-x-ray-sources?utm_source=iContact&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nasajpl&utm_content=daily20230406-2
"These objects are more than 100 times brighter than they should be. Observations by the agency’s NuSTAR X-ray telescope support a possible solution to this puzzle."
Pretty interesting article. It demonstates just how the scientific method works. When observations indicate that a theory might not be correct, scientists move to modify the theory. The goal is always to make the observations match the theory and
You have that a bit scrambled up and wrong-- Observations are king and theory is the servant, the peasant-- The goal is to make the Theory match the observations, no vice versa involved.
Now I have a different take on this observation, in that Light Waves are not sinusoidal nor semicircle waves but are Cycloid waves. And so Cycloid waves can Superimpose and be 100 times brighter than they should be.
I will look into this and include in my upcoming book 236th book.
236th book of science-- Proof that Light Waves are cycloid waves, not sinusoid and not semicircle.
On Thursday, April 6, 2023 at 5:06:05 PM UTC-7, Paul Alsing wrote:versa. This is exactly how the scientific method is supposed to work.
https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/nasa-study-helps-explain-limit-breaking-ultra-luminous-x-ray-sources?utm_source=iContact&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nasajpl&utm_content=daily20230406-2
"These objects are more than 100 times brighter than they should be. Observations by the agency’s NuSTAR X-ray telescope support a possible solution to this puzzle."
Pretty interesting article. It demonstates just how the scientific method works. When observations indicate that a theory might not be correct, scientists move to modify the theory. The goal is always to make the observations match the theory and vice-
Remember where their JW telescope fell back.
They have a new Moon hoax on their hands...
They were ready for both.
Now I know that Sound waves are longitudinal and that I hypothesized that the X-ray and gamma rays go back into being longitudinal same as radio waves, while in the middle of the spectrum are the Transverse Cycloid waves.
So when stars emit x-rays they are a clash of Transverse Cycloid and becoming Longitudinal. And in this clash they superimpose for Ultra Luminous Light.
Now I think I can find an example in just Sound waves, although Sound waves are never Transverse Cycloid.
So I am looking in Sound phenomenon where you get two sharp loud sounds superimpose. As I said before, Sound waves have no Transverse Cycloid component.
But we do have a Transverse Cycloid component plus Longitudinal component is Microwaves going into Radio waves.
So the EM Spectrum has two spots in which waves can combine as Transverse Cycloid and Longitudinal -- the Radio wave boundary and the X-ray boundary.
On Thursday, April 6, 2023 at 7:06:05 PM UTC-5, Paul Alsing wrote:versa. This is exactly how the scientific method is supposed to work.
https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/nasa-study-helps-explain-limit-breaking-ultra-luminous-x-ray-sources?utm_source=iContact&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nasajpl&utm_content=daily20230406-2
"These objects are more than 100 times brighter than they should be. Observations by the agency’s NuSTAR X-ray telescope support a possible solution to this puzzle."
Pretty interesting article. It demonstates just how the scientific method works. When observations indicate that a theory might not be correct, scientists move to modify the theory. The goal is always to make the observations match the theory and vice-
You have that a bit scrambled up and wrong-- Observations are king and theory is the servant, the peasant-- The goal is to make the Theory match the observations, no vice versa involved.
Now I have a different take on this observation,
https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/nasa-study-helps-explain-limit-breaking-ultra-luminous-x-ray-sources?utm_source=iContact&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nasajpl&utm_content=daily20230406-2versa. This is exactly how the scientific method is supposed to work.
"These objects are more than 100 times brighter than they should be. Observations by the agency’s NuSTAR X-ray telescope support a possible solution to this puzzle."
Pretty interesting article. It demonstates just how the scientific method works. When observations indicate that a theory might not be correct, scientists move to modify the theory. The goal is always to make the observations match the theory and vice-
Hymnal : GOD HOW GREAT THOU ART
(music of Chariots or Fire, Electronix, Olympic Themes, 3:29)
Manna of Logical thought Exodus 16-- AP's 231st book All Things are made up of Atoms. The Universe is a Thing. Therefore the Universe is one single Atom of 231Plutonium // Logic
All Things are made up of Atoms. The Universe is a Thing. Therefore the Universe is one single Atom of 231Plutonium // Logic
Wood louse of Math and Bathynomus giganteus of Physics Archimedes "🖖 highly illogical 🖖" Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> tarded:
Manna of Logical thought Exodus 16-- AP's 231st book All Things are made up of Atoms. The Universe is a Thing. Therefore the Universe is one single Atom of 231Plutonium // Logic
All Things are made up of Atoms. The Universe is a Thing. Therefore the Universe is one single Atom of 231Plutonium // Logic
Why won't you describe how you came to your ridiculously illogical "revelation"?
I would think you would be proud of your "revelation" and
would love to show me that it's actually logical.
babbling about your necrophilic fantasy about fucking corpses? Does your "revelation" that the entire universe must be a cosmic atom have
something to do with your necrophilia? Or are you just having a combined autistic, necrophilic meltdown?
I am still interested in the "logic" where you come up with that "revelation"! If all things are made of atoms*, and the universe is a
thing, then the logical conclusion is that the Universe is made of
atomS. Lots and lots of atoms, since the universe isn't simply a thing,
it's the sum total of all other things, including all of their many
atoms. Zillions and zillions and zillions of atoms.
Didn't you say your "discovery" was some sort of hallucination or
nightmare, where you dreamed of some giant plutonium atom talked to you? Could that have been some sort of LSD flashback?
How did you come up with something so bizarrely illogical? You can't
tell the difference between zillions and zillions of atoms and one atom?
I mean it's essentially a tautology that the universe is made of
zillions and zillions of atoms if the universe is a thing, and things
are made up of atoms. There's no difficult logic where you get screwed up.
(*) Ignoring that most matter is plasma, not really atoms, plus there
is, at least in theory, neutron star stuff, white dwarf stuff and black
hole mass.
Manna of Logical thought Exodus 16-- AP's 231st book All Things are made up of Atoms. The Universe is a Thing. Therefore the Universe is one single Atom of 231Plutonium // Logic
All Things are made up of Atoms. The Universe is a Thing. Therefore the Universe is one single Atom of 231Plutonium // Logic
Wood louse of Math and Bathynomus giganteus of Physicstorus doing the Faraday law. In fact so stupid is this list of so called physicists that they went through life believing the slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, when in reality it is a Oval of 1 axis of symmetry for the cone has 1 axis of symmetry
On Thursday, January 26, 2023 at 10:55:02 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote: >"certifiably insane"
fails at math and science:
"I want to fuck her corpse""I want to fuck her corpse"
Not again!
I want to fuck her corpse
You sicko! Why do you keep saying that?
wanting to fuck her corpse
I want to fuck her corpse
I want to fuck her corpse
On Sunday, September 11, 2022 at 12:07:15 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
I want to fuck her corpseOn Sunday, April 16, 2023 at 2:26:54 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
Wood louse of Math and Bathynomus giganteus of Physics
tarded:
NSF Dr.Panchanathan, Harvard's Sheldon Glashow, Peter Higgs ever ask the question, which is the atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle which AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole while the real electron is a muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton
1) Too stupid to question if Thomson found Dirac's magnetic monopole and not the electron of atoms.electricity.
2) Too stupid to realize that in the Rutherford,Geiger, Marsden Experiment when you have increase in velocity of bounce back alpha particles means head on collision with a larger proton torus, hence, the interior of gold atoms are toruses, no nucleus.
3) Too stupid in logic to understand subatomic particles have jobs and tasks to do, not sit around on beaches sipping lemonade what Old Physics says. The proton is a 8 ring torus with muon as electron inside doing the Faraday law producing new
4) Too stupid to understand stars and our Sun shine not from fusion but from Faraday law of each and every atom inside that star.Showing that Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow, Ed Witten, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Arthur B. McDonald are sapheads when it comes to logical thinking in physics with their do nothing proton, do nothing electron.
5) think a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse when it is proven to be a Oval, never the ellipse. For the cone and oval have 1 axis of symmetry, while ellipse has 2.
6) think Boole logic is correct with AND truth table being TFFF when it really is TTTF in order to avoid 2 OR 1 =3 with AND as subtraction
7) can never do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and are too ignorant in math to understand that analysis of something is not proving something in their "limit hornswaggle"
8) too stupid in science to ask the question of physics-- is the 1897 Thomson discovery of a 0.5MeV particle actually the Dirac magnetic monopole and that the muon is the true electron of atoms stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law.
is 840MeV to 105MeVRoger Penrose, Reinhard Genzel, Andrea Ghez,
Peter Higgs, Rainer Weiss, Kip S. Thorne, Barry C. Barish
David J. Thouless_, F. Duncan M. Haldane, John M. Kosterlitz, Takaaki Kajita
Arthur B. McDonald
Francois Englert
Saul Perlmutter
Brian P. Schmidt
Adam G. Riess
Makoto Kobayashi
Toshihide Maskawa_
Yoichiro Nambu_
John C. Mather
George F. Smoot
Roy J. Glauber_
David J. Gross
Hugh David Politzer
Frank Wilczek
Raymond Davis Jr. _
Masatoshi Koshiba_
Riccardo Giacconi_
Gerardus 't Hooft
Martinus J.G. Veltman_
Jerome I. Friedman
Henry W. Kendall_
Richard E. Taylor_
Carlo Rubbia
Simon van der Meer_
William Alfred Fowler_
Kenneth G. Wilson_
James Watson Cronin_
Val Logsdon Fitch_
Sheldon Lee Glashow
Steven Weinberg_
.
.
little fishes
.
.
Layers of error thinking physics Re: 2-Comparative Analysis of failures of Logic with failures of Physics// one thinks 3 OR 2 =5 with 3 AND 2 = subtraction of either 3 or 2, while the other thinks proton to electron is 938MeV vs .5MeV when truly it
Physical Review Letters: Proton Mass
Yi-Bo Yang, Jian Liang, Yu-Jiang Bi, Ying Chen, Terrence Draper, Keh-Fei Liu, Zhaofeng Liu
more and more layers of error thinking physics
.
.
Edward Witten
John Baez
Brian Greene
Lisa Randall
Alan H. Guth
Michael E. Brown
Konstantin Batygin
Ben Bullock
Larry Harson
Mark Barton, PhD in Physics, The University of Queensland, physicist with National Astronomical Observatory of Japan
Answered Aug 26, 2013 · Author has 8.7k answers and 10.3m answer views None at all - he was a raving nutter.
Richard A. Muller, crank at Berkeley
Jennifer Kahn, Discover, science hater
Eric Francis Coppolino, newsreporter hatred of science, George Witte, St.Martin's Press science hater
Toby Howard, The Guardian, science hater
#2-1, 137th published book
Introduction to AP's TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Physics textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
I can remember where Teaching True Physics was started by me.#1 New Release in Electromagnetic Theory
This will be AP's 137th published book on science. And the number 137 is special to me for it is the number of QED, Quantum Electrodynamics as the inverse fine structure constant. I can always remember 137 as that special constant of physics and so
before was Maxwell in 1860s with his books and Encyclopedia Britannica editorship. The time is ripe in 2020 for the new authoritative texts on physics. It will be started in 2020 which is 60 years after Feynman. In the future, I request the physicsTime has come for the world to have the authoritative textbooks for all of High School and College education. Written by the leading physics expert of the time. The last such was Feynman in the 1960s with Feynman Lectures on Physics. The time
physics; for all sciences are under the Atom Totality theory.Feynman was the best to make the last authoritative textbook series for his concentration was QED, Quantum Electrodynamics, the pinnacle peak of physics during the 20th century. Of course the Atom Totality theory took over after 1990 and all of
Electricity and Magnetism.And as QED was the pinnacle peak before 1990, the new pinnacle peak is the Atom Totality theory. The Atom Totality theory is the advancement of QED, for the Atom Totality theory primal axiom says -- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but
year High School, wherein I myself started learning physics. But because of so much fraud and fakery in physics education, I believe we have to drop down to Junior year High School to make a drastic and dramatic emphasis on fakery and con-artistry thatLength: 64 pages
Product details
• File Size : 790 KB
• Publication Date : October 5, 2020
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print Length : 64 pages
• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Language: : English
• ASIN : B08KS4YGWY
• Lending : Enabled
• Best Sellers Rank: #430,602 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #39 in Electromagnetic Theory
◦ #73 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
◦ #74 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
#2-2, 145th published book
TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS//Junior High School// Physics textbook series, book 2
Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
What I am doing is clearing the field of physics, clearing it of all the silly mistakes and errors and beliefs that clutter up physics. Clearing it of its fraud and fakeries and con-artistry. I thought of doing these textbooks starting with Senior
believe it is easier to teach a science by teaching its history than any other means of teaching. So for senior year High School, I believe physics history is the best way of teaching physics. And in later years of physics courses, we can always pick upProduct details
• ASIN : B08PC99JJB
• Publication date : November 29, 2020
• Language: : English
• File size : 682 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print length : 78 pages
• Lending : Enabled
• Best Sellers Rank: #185,995 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #42 in Two-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
◦ #344 in Physics (Kindle Store)
◦ #2,160 in Physics (Books)
#2-3, 146th published book
TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Senior High School// Physics textbook series, book 3
Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
I believe that in knowing the history of a science is knowing half of that science. And that if you are amiss of knowing the history behind a science, you have only a partial understanding of the concepts and ideas behind the science. I further
Cover Picture: Is the book The History of Physics, by Isaac Asimov, 1966 and on top of the book are 4 cut-outs of bent circles representing magnetic monopoles which revolutionizes modern physics, especially the ElectroMagnetic theory.
Product details
• ASIN : B08RK33T8V
• Publication date : December 28, 2020
• Language : English
• File size : 794 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print length : 123 pages
• Lending : Enabled
• Best Sellers Rank: #4,167,235 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #15,099 in Physics (Kindle Store)
◦ #91,163 in Physics (Books)
physics is a crossroad to all the other hard core sciences, where physics course is mandatory such as in chemistry or even biology. I have endeavored to make physics 1st year college to be as easy and simple to learn. In this endeavor to make physics#2-4, 151st published book
TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// 1st year College// Physics textbook series, book 4
Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Preface: This is AP's 151st book of science published. It is one of my most important books of science because 1st year college physics is so impressionable on students, if they should continue with physics, or look elsewhere for a career. And also,
that awful experience, maybe this textbook would have never been written by me.Maybe it was good that I had those impressions of physics education of poor education, which still exists throughout physics today. Because maybe I am forced to write this book, because of that awful experience of learning physics in 1969. Without
education, and separates-out, what is Old Physics from what is New Physics.Cover picture is the template book of Halliday & Resnick, 1988, 3rd edition Fundamentals of Physics and sitting on top are cut outs of "half bent circles, bent at 90 degrees" to imitate magnetic monopoles. Magnetic Monopoles revolutionizes physics
Product details
• ASIN : B09JW5DVYM
• Publication date : October 19, 2021
• Language : English
• File size : 1035 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print length : 386 pages
• Lending : Enabled
• Best Sellers Rank: #4,874,333 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #526 in Electromagnetic Theory
◦ #1,321 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
◦ #9,546 in Electromagnetism (Books)
University of Cincinnati, I took physics thermodynamics in the 2nd year (if memory has not failed me).#2-5, 174th published book
TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, 2nd year College
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Kindle Edition
Preface: At the moment this is a physics book for 2nd year College. But as the months and years go by I intend to convert it into a textbook of about 200 to 300 pages. It is mostly about thermodynamics for in my own college education 1968-1972 at
monopole.Cover-Picture: Is a iphone photograph of the Chemistry textbook I used at UC 1968-1972 with my own paper cut-outs of magnetic monopoles. Pictured are 4 bent circles, bent at 90degrees from diameter and each bent circle is a individual magnetic
Product details
• ASIN : B09TKL4HMC
• Publication date : February 27, 2022
• Language : English
• File size : 675 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print length : 41 pages
• Lending : Enabled
of electricity and magnetism. For the primal-axiom over all of physics is-- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism. The 2nd year College is thermodynamics. And now the 3rd year College physics has to teach the Architecture, the#2-6, 177th published book
TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, Architecture of Atoms, 3rd year College
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Kindle Edition
Preface: I come to teaching physics for 3rd year College as the Architecture of Atoms. My writing style will be prose-narrative, until I add on exercise problems and convert it into a textbook. The 1st year College, has to be the equations and laws
Architecture of Atoms. Not many professors of chemistry or physics dive into the Shrodinger Equation that results in a meaningful teaching of "matter waves". Matter waves are the heart of understanding the geometry of Atomic Architecture.Cover Picture: A iphone photograph of my book chemistry book, a long time favorite of mine of CHEM ONE, 2nd edition, Waser, Trueblood, Knobler, 1980, and page 307 of that book. Why this page? Because it was instrumental in my discovery of the true
Product details
• ASIN : B09VFH9QST
• Publication date : March 12, 2022
• Language : English
• File size : 823 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Not Enabled
• Print length : 74 pages
• Lending : Enabled
#2-7, 178th published book
TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, Architecture of Light Waves & Energy, 4th year College
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Kindle edition)
defined as physics that knows and uses the true electron of atoms is the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus and doing the Faraday law, creating new electrical energy that is storaged in the neutrons of atoms until they grow from 1eV into 945MeV andPreface: This is 4th year College Physics and the important ideas of physics to learn as last year undergraduate school is the architecture and geometry of the Light Wave & Energy in physics. This is New Physics and not Old Physics. New Physics is
arranged the monopoles into a single strand of a cycloid wave.The template book for 4th year College is Feynman's 1985 book of QED.
Cover Picture: Is my iphone photograph of the template book for this book. Feynman's 1985 QED, quantum electrodynamics, showing my plastic toy model of DNA and my cut-outs of 4 bent circles that each bent circle represents one magnetic monopole. I
Product details
• ASIN : B09W58XGDW
• Publication date : March 21, 2022
• Language : English
• File size : 824 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print length : 66 pages
• Lending : Enabled
On Sunday, September 11, 2022 at 12:07:15 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
I want to fuck her corpseOn Monday, September 19, 2022 at 3:21:37 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
fails at math and science:Kibo Parry M the 30 year stalker joined by his friends Chris Thomasson and Dan Christensen
Why Kibo, because Ruth Charney, Jill Pipher, Harvard's Dr.Hau cannot admit slant cut of cone is Oval, never ellipse???
Kibo Parry M on CIA Kate Heinzelman,Harvard's Dr. Hau.
Kibo on > I want to fuck her corpse
On Sunday, September 11, 2022 at 12:07:15 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
I want to fuck her corpseWhy Kibo??? Because she refuses to finish her experiment and see all the light vanishes simultaneously, or is it because she can not admit slant cut of cone is Oval, never ellipse???
On Wednesday, November 2, 2022 at 12:21:30 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote: >"Imp of Math"
On Monday, January 18, 2021 at 2:06:24 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
fails at math and science:Re: Drs.Larry Summers, Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall of Harvard, teach percentages correctly??-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole (1)
By Michael Moroney 1/23/18, 44 posts 461 views
Kibo on Kate Heinzelman
On Sunday, September 11, 2022 at 12:07:15 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
I want to fuck her corpseKibo Parry Moroney in 1997 blows his CIA cover-- to the entire world, mind you---
Re: Archimedes Vanadium, America's most beloved poster
In article <5nefan$i06$9...@news.thecia.net> kibo greps <ki...@shell.thecia.net> writes:
On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 at 9:13:14 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote: >"Court Jester of Math"Kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945, because the AMS certainly will not publish AP's conic proof? Maybe that is all the AMS publishes-- fake math.
Kibo,is Ruth Charney of AMS the model in your book, for she cannot admit the slant cut of cone is Oval, never the ellipse as proven by AP in 2016? I know it falls on deaf ears of Kibo with his 938 is 12% short of 945. And Ruth, would the AMS publish
Kibo on wanting to fuck her corpse/Kate Heinzelman, question, do you not think CIA is going overboard on stalking-- I mean 30 years for the insane Kibo Parry M??
On Sunday, September 11, 2022 at 12:07:15 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
I want to fuck her corpseOn Monday, September 19, 2022 at 3:21:37 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
fails at math and science:Kibo's "I want to fuck her corpse" rubbing off on Canada's Dan Christensen with his 20 year stalking of Univ Toronto's Rose M. Patten, Univ Western Ontario's Linda Hasenfratz, when Dan is a failure of math and logic with his 2 OR 1=3, and his ellipse
Kibo Parry M the 30 year stalker joined by his friends Chris Thomasson and Dan Christensen
Why Kibo, because Ruth Charney, Jill Pipher, Harvard's Dr.Hau cannot admit slant cut of cone is Oval, never ellipse???
On Thursday, January 26, 2023 at 10:55:02 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote: >"certifiably insane"
fails at math and science:
"I want to fuck her corpse""I want to fuck her corpse"
Not again!
I want to fuck her corpse
You sicko! Why do you keep saying that?
wanting to fuck her corpse
I want to fuck her corpse
I want to fuck her corpse
Re: Kibo on > I want to fuck her corpse > AMS Jill Pipher, Ruth Charney, Harvard's Dr.Lisa Randall, Dr.Hau,CIA Kate Heinzelman, MIT's Anette Hosoi,Cynthia Barnhart
by Augǝl Jan 1, 2023, 7:41:27 AM
On Monday, 17 April 2023 at 16:18:28 UTC+10, Volney wrote:
Wood louse of Math and Bathynomus giganteus of Physics Archimedes "🖖
highly illogical 🖖" Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> tarded:
Manna of Logical thought Exodus 16-- AP's 231st book All Things are made up of Atoms. The Universe is a Thing. Therefore the Universe is one single Atom of 231Plutonium // Logic
Well, that level of logic got our Archie mention in wiki, which is more than you got, Moroney.
All Things are made up of Atoms. The Universe is a Thing. Therefore the Universe is one single Atom of 231Plutonium // Logic
It is illogic, but so what, all theoretical physics is illogic like bigbang, blackhole, neutronstar, etc. which have less relevance to our lives than fairies, unicorns and pixies.
globally accepted.Why won't you describe how you came to your ridiculously illogical
"revelation"?
When confronted by such institutional illogic as bigbang, stringtheory, neutrinos, etc. one has to get one's creative juices in illogic boiling, and Archie's toxic Plutonium universe is illogic of supreme quality, thus surpassing the feebler illogic
I would think you would be proud of your "revelation" and
would love to show me that it's actually logical.
If bigbang and blackhole is logical, then why is not Archie's uni-pluto-atomium universe logical?
It can be expressed in any mathematical formulation required, involving tensors and weird symbols produced by long haired autists - no one needs to understand, what!
It is part of the capitalist conspiracy to maintain the status quo which suits the capitalists, by comparing with, and thus dismissing my brilliant, original and useful works.
Archie with his crap is allowed to hog all the limelight
and put genuine geniuses such as I out of reckoning.
Yes, they all amount to just one Plutonium atom, in the supreme illogic of Our Archie.
More like, Archie is a paid tool of capitalist interests, paid for creating and disseminating stupidity.
If he is not paid for this propaganda, he is really really really stupid,
or has a great great great sense of humour. Top practical joker.
How did you come up with something so bizarrely illogical? You can't
tell the difference between zillions and zillions of atoms and one atom?
I mean it's essentially a tautology that the universe is made of
zillions and zillions of atoms if the universe is a thing, and things
are made up of atoms. There's no difficult logic where you get screwed up.
We are not talking of logic, Moroney. Quite the reverse, and why so.
(*) Ignoring that most matter is plasma, not really atoms, plus there
is, at least in theory, neutron star stuff, white dwarf stuff and black
hole mass.
See, how all these fanciful or illogical stuffs above pale into insignificance when confronted by Archie's grandly simple and illogical structure of the single Plutonium atom universe.
Wood louse of Math and Bathynomus giganteus of Physics
"not one single marble of commonsense in my entire brain"
tarded:
🦴👤 of Math and 💩👤 of Physics Archimedes "spamtard" Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> tarded:
Jason Herrmann,Stanford Univ Mason Yearian,Stanley Wojcicki, Robert Wagoner get a 1 star out of 5 for never asking which is the Atom's true electron
Jason Herrmann,Stanford Univ Mason Yearian,Stanley Wojcicki, Robert Wagoner get a 1 star out of 5 for never asking which is the Atom's true electron
Jason Herrmann,Stanford Univ Mason Yearian,Stanley Wojcicki, Robert Wagoner get a 1 star out of 5 for never asking which is the Atom's true electron
Jason Herrmann,Stanford Univ Mason Yearian,Stanley Wojcicki, Robert Wagoner get a 1 star out of 5 for never asking which is the Atom's true electron
Jason Herrmann,Stanford Univ Mason Yearian,Stanley Wojcicki, Robert Wagoner get a 1 star out of 5 for never asking which is the Atom's true electron
Oh no! It looks like Plutonium is mad that McTard is out-spamming him,
so Pluto increases his own spam output. In just this topic Pluto spams
at least 10 times.
<snip rest of Plutonium's spam>
On 4/17/2023 3:06 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
On Monday, 17 April 2023 at 16:18:28 UTC+10, Volney wrote:
Wood louse of Math and Bathynomus giganteus of Physics Archimedes "🖖 >> highly illogical 🖖" Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> tarded:
Manna of Logical thought Exodus 16-- AP's 231st book All Things are made up of Atoms. The Universe is a Thing. Therefore the Universe is one single Atom of 231Plutonium // Logic
Well, that level of logic got our Archie mention in wiki, which is more than you got, Moroney.Why would I consider not being mentioned in a wiki the way ArchiePoo was
to be a bad thing? After all, Archie got there by being a notorious crank.
All Things are made up of Atoms. The Universe is a Thing. Therefore the Universe is one single Atom of 231Plutonium // Logic
It is illogic, but so what, all theoretical physics is illogic like bigbang, blackhole, neutronstar, etc. which have less relevance to our lives than fairies, unicorns and pixies.All those things you call illogic do have scientific theories and logic behind them. Unlike Archie's cosmic atom nuttiness.
And unlike your
crashing armatures, near absolute zero stars and similar nonsenses.
globally accepted.Why won't you describe how you came to your ridiculously illogical
"revelation"?
When confronted by such institutional illogic as bigbang, stringtheory, neutrinos, etc. one has to get one's creative juices in illogic boiling, and Archie's toxic Plutonium universe is illogic of supreme quality, thus surpassing the feebler illogic
I am interested in illogical beliefs which is why I am interested in how
he rationalizes many, many, many = one.
I would think you would be proud of your "revelation" and
would love to show me that it's actually logical.
If bigbang and blackhole is logical, then why is not Archie's uni-pluto-atomium universe logical?Because big bang and black holes have logical support, while many many
many = one doesn't. For example we can observe the universe and see
distant galaxies all moving away from us/each other.
If you look back in
time they were all closer.
Go far enough back in time and they appear to
be all together at some point.
suggests it.
Meanwhile ArchiePoo doesn't have any evidence suggesting
any cosmic atom, and certainly many many many doesn't become one. Even
you can understand that.
It can be expressed in any mathematical formulation required, involving tensors and weird symbols produced by long haired autists - no one needs to understand, what!Gibberish.
It is part of the capitalist conspiracy to maintain the status quo which suits the capitalists, by comparing with, and thus dismissing my brilliant, original and useful works.Blaming your own failures on conspiracy theories and your racism rather
than your own megalomania and poor understanding of science won't get
you anywhere. You'll soon be forgotten.
Archie with his crap is allowed to hog all the limelightThis Usenet group is part of dying form of social media. Serious
discussion vanished long ago. Archie is just a big frog in a dwindling
mud puddle shriveling up in the desert sun, hardly any "limelight" here.
If you are upset that you are just a little frog in the mud puddle, what does it matter?
and put genuine geniuses such as I out of reckoning.
If you were a real genius, you certainly wouldn't waste your own time promoting your nonsense in this little mud puddle.
You'd look to be a
big frog in Lake Superior. And you'd produce things to impress the other frogs rather than have them laugh at you.
Yes, they all amount to just one Plutonium atom, in the supreme illogic of Our Archie.It still amazes me that you and Archie can recognize each other as a crackpot but never yourselves as a crackpot.
More like, Archie is a paid tool of capitalist interests, paid for creating and disseminating stupidity.Just because Archie is an expert at disseminating stupidity doesn't mean he's being paid to do so. Who is paying you?
If he is not paid for this propaganda, he is really really really stupid,He is, just like his twin, yourself.
or has a great great great sense of humour. Top practical joker.Running the same practical joke for 30 years?
Kibo on Plutonium's mental illnessproton torus doing the Faraday law.
Peter Higgs,Sheldon Glashow, Francois Englert, Saul Perlmutter ever ask the question, which is the atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle which AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole while the real electron is a muon stuck inside a 840MeV
On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 12:16:37 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
Archimedes "insignificant" Plutonium
Kibo says: An anagram of "Archimedes Plutonium" is "I Pound His Male Rectum."
On Friday, July 14, 2023 at 4:20:59 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
Archimedes "mentally ill" Plutonium Re: Archimedes "imp of math" Plutonium
On Friday, July 14, 2023 at 4:20:59 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
Archimedes "mentally ill" Plutonium
On Friday, June 30, 2023 at 7:52:00 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
Archimedes "Meckling's Village Idiot" Plutonium
Archimedes Plutonium defiles the pope and then tards:
On Monday, June 26, 2023 at 10:10:38 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
Archimedes "little stinker" Plutonium
Archimedes Plutonium fails at math and science:
An anagram of "Archimedes Plutonium" is "The Delicious Rump Man"
An anagram of "Archimedes Plutonium" is "I Pound His Male Rectum"
An anagram of "Archimedes Plutonium" is "Penis Could Mature Him"
An anagram of "Archimedes Plutonium" is "Old-Time U.S. Urine Champ"
Kibo on how Plutonium's "science" is garbage.proton torus doing the Faraday law.
Peter Higgs,Sheldon Glashow, Francois Englert, Saul Perlmutter ever ask the question, which is the atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle which AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole while the real electron is a muon stuck inside a 840MeV
On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 12:16:37 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
Archimedes "insignificant" Plutonium
Kibo says: An anagram of "Archimedes Plutonium" is "I Pound His Male Rectum."
On Friday, July 14, 2023 at 4:20:59 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
Archimedes "mentally ill" Plutonium Re: Archimedes "imp of math" Plutonium
On Friday, July 14, 2023 at 4:20:59 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
Archimedes "mentally ill" Plutonium
On Friday, June 30, 2023 at 7:52:00 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
Archimedes "Meckling's Village Idiot" Plutonium
Archimedes Plutonium defiles the pope and then tards:
On Monday, June 26, 2023 at 10:10:38 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
Archimedes "little stinker" Plutonium
Archimedes Plutonium fails at math and science:
An anagram of "Archimedes Plutonium" is "The Delicious Rump Man"
An anagram of "Archimedes Plutonium" is "I Pound His Male Rectum"
An anagram of "Archimedes Plutonium" is "Penis Could Mature Him"
An anagram of "Archimedes Plutonium" is "Old-Time U.S. Urine Champ"
On Sunday, July 30, 2023 at 11:01:14 PM UTC-5, Jim Pennino wrote:
Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> wrote:
So Jim, describe the Middle Third Rule of Engineering for High School students, teaching them in class.
Internet has nothing of teaching value on Middle Third Rule.
But standard civil engineering texts do.
Have you ever heard of a library?
No Jim, we all want you to be "positive useful for a change"
instead of crapping all over someone you stalk.
State the Middle Third Rule of Engineering so that a High School student can understand it.
On Thursday, August 24, 2023 at 2:17:31 AM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:that they proved an irresistible lure.
--- quoting New Scientist ---
Why ancient deer returned to the sea and became whales
19 March 2018
New Scientist
Ambulocetus, an early whale
Animals first evolved to live exclusively on land about 370 million years ago – but on dozens of occasions since then land animals have gone back to exploiting the seas. That might be because the shallow seas around continents are so full of food
animals of deer like creatures to be the ancestor of whales.
Some of the most spectacular species now living in the sea have land-living ancestors. Whales are descended from animals similar to deer, while walruses and seals evolved from animals a bit like modern otters.
--- end quoting ---
Checking into their toes or hooves. And the whales elimination of that.
Now the Whales are split into two groups, the filter feeders and the non filter feeders. And I bet the sauropods are split into at least two groups, so that whales directly evolved from sauropods, and not the stupendous silly idea of looking for forest
Now the otters, walruses, and seals, also, most likely evolved from sauropods, although a meat eating sauropod, not as huge as the plant eating sauropods. A creature that likely was a small sauropod that hugged the coastline.
So it looks as though I am going to rewrite the evolutionary history of whale and other animals story.
Jim has likely been in the cockpit of a B52 bomber for too long and not enough time observing the 3 columns of gas bubbles in water electrolysis.
My 134th published book
Introduction to TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 1 for ages 5 through 26, math textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
electrolysis of water.On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 8:56:57 AM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
Now I see some of these electronic weighing scales are accurate to 0.00001 gram. I do not know if that is within the accuracy I need for weighing a test tube of oxygen then a test tube of hydrogen from water electrolysis.
Now modern day physics and chemist experimenters can really do a marvelous job if they wanted to. For they could freeze the test tubes of oxygen and hydrogen to where they are liquid and compare liquids from water electrolysis.
So, what AP is saying here is that we do electrolysis of water. We collect the two test tubes, one with oxygen the other with hydrogen.
To prove Water is truly the formula H4O and not H2O we must weigh the masses of the two tubes to find that the ratio is 1 x 16amu to 4 x 1amu.
The silly grotesque science error of the past was to look at volumes in the two test tubes-- "Hey-- the hydrogen is twice the volume of oxygen so the formula of water is H2O".
No, way was that science good practice. For the correct formula of water needs to be measured by mass, by atomic mass units where Oxygen is 16amu and hydrogen is 1amu.
I suspect a balance beam scale is good enough to see the hydrogen test tube will be 1/4 as massive as the oxygen test tube. To get within precision of electronic weighing scale of 0.00001 gram we just have to make a larger test tube of
AP is betting that the readings will be hydrogen test tube 1/4 the mass of oxygen test tube proving Water formula is truly H4O.
Old Physics and Old Chemistry is betting that the mass experiment will have the hydrogen test tube be 1/8 the mass of the oxygen test tube, proving Water formula is H2O.
AP does not have these precision equipment to conduct an at-home experiment of this nature.
other properties of solid methane is discussed near 20.48K and...So, once Water is found to actually be H4O, not H2O, we move on to methane, and ask the same question of its hydrogen bonds. Is Methane really that of H8C and not H4C.
Well, looking in the literature for anomalies to methane, I come across a arXiv "Low and high-temperature anomalies in the physical properties of solid methane "The anomalous behavior of thermodynamic, spectral, plastic, elastic and some
AP wonders: if they can get methane to solid form, well, I am then hopeful that the mass of the molecule can be determined. Because if methane is truly H8C, that difference of H4 in atomic mass units would be very much noticeable difference.
Chemistry Europe--
"The Anomalous Deuterium Isotope Effect in the NMR Spectrum of Methane...
P Vermeeren, 2023
"The abnormally long and weak methylidyne C-H bond.."
"The C-H bond of the methylidyne radical, CH*, is abnormally long and weak, even longer and..."
AP asks, are these anomalies solved if we consider methane is actually H8C and not H4C?
AP
research with date-time markers, and fact telling. And there are no problem sets. This book is intended for 1st year college. Until I include problem sets and exercises, I leave it to the professor and instructor to provide such. And also, chemistry isMy 250th published book.
TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY; H2 is the hydrogen Atom and water is H4O, not H2O// Chemistry
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle)
Prologue: This textbook is 1/2 research history and 1/2 factual textbook combined as one textbook. For many of the experiments described here-in have not yet been performed, such as water is really H4O not H2O. Written in a style of history
textbook series. What got me started on this project is the fact that no chemistry textbook had the correct formula for water which is actually H4O and not H2O. Leaving the true formula for hydroxyl groups as H2O and not OH. But none of this is possiblePreface: This is my 250th book of science, and the first of my textbooks on Teaching True Chemistry. I have completed the Teaching True Physics and the Teaching True Mathematics textbook series. But had not yet started on a Teaching True Chemistry
Water molecule H4O plus the subatomic particle H, and the hydrogen atom H2. Showing how one H is a proton torus with muon inside (blue color) doing the Faraday law. Protons are toruses with many windings. Protons are the coils in Faraday law while muonsCover Picture: Sorry for the crude sketch work but chemistry and physics students are going to have to learn to make such sketches in a minute or less. Just as they make Lewis diagrams or ball & stick diagrams. My 4-5 minute sketch-work of the
Product details
• ASIN : B0CCLPTBDG
• Publication date : July 21, 2023
• Language : English
• File size : 784 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Sticky notes : On Kindle Scribe
• Print length : 160 pages
y z
| /
| /
|/______ x
My 134th published bookthrough 26, math textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
Introduction to TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 1 for ages 5
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
"the FUCKHOLE of math"On Tuesday, August 29, 2023 at 11:28:58 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
"Kim Jong Un's stooge"
In article <5nefan$i06$9...@news.thecia.net> kibo greps <ki...@shell.thecia.net> writes:
My 134th published bookthrough 26, math textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
Introduction to TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 1 for ages 5
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
My 134th published bookthrough 26, math textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
Introduction to TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 1 for ages 5
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
"Drag Queen of Science"
"irrelevant"
"the FUCKHOLE of math"On Tuesday, August 29, 2023 at 11:28:58 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
"Kim Jong Un's stooge"
is *always* wrong.
In article <5nefan$i06$9...@news.thecia.net> kibo greps <ki...@shell.thecia.net> writes:
My 134th published book
Introduction to TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 1 for ages 5 through 26, math textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
My 134th published book
Introduction to TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 1 for ages 5 through 26, math textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
My 134th published book
Introduction to TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 1 for ages 5 through 26, math textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon. Hardly "exactly" 9 muons.
Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572. A proton is about the mass
of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.
Mindless spamming fuckdogOn Tuesday, September 5, 2023 at 10:59:27 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
crazy
wasn't bolted down too tight in the first place
Why do you keep trying to brainwash little 5 year old kids?
Village Idiot
On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 1:39:21 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
Hagfish of Math and Slime Eel of Physics "struggling for
relevance"
"Drag Queen of Science"On Sunday, September 3, 2023 at 12:31:40 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote: >"illogical"
"psychoceramic> fails at math and science:
"shithead oaf of math> fails at math and science:
"Court Jester of Physics"
"howling crazy fuckdog> fails at math and science:
Physics minnow
WARNING TO ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING STUDENTS:
Re: Archimedes Vanadium, America's most beloved poster
On Sunday, June 8, 1997 at 2:00:00 AM UTC-5, Scott Dorsey wrote:
In article <5nefan$i06$9...@news.thecia.net> kibo greps <ki...@shell.thecia.net> writes:
ControversyInternet access on "an experimental basis."
Many government and university installations blocked, threatened to block, or attempted to shut-down The World's Internet connection until Software Tool & Die was eventually granted permission by the National Science Foundation to provide public
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Dr. Panchanathan , present day
NSF Dr. Panchanathan, F. Fleming Crim, Dorothy E Aronson, Brian Stone, James S Ulvestad (math), Rebecca Lynn Keiser, Vernon D. Ross, Lloyd Whitman, John J. Veysey (physics), Scott Stanley
France Anne Cordova
Subra Suresh (bioengineer)
Arden Lee Bement Jr. (nuclear engineering)
Rita R. Colwell (microbiology)
Neal Francis Lane
John Howard Gibbons 1993
Barry Shein, kibo parry std world
Jim Frost, Joe "Spike" Ilacqua
Canada-- NSERC , Alejandro Adem (math) , Navdeep Bains, Francois-Philippe Champagne
Aug 30, 2023, 10:19:20 PM (yesterday)
to Plutonium Atom Universe
News starting to come in that AP's Water Electrolysis Experiment proves the true formula of Water is H4O, not H2O is starting to come in.
I received a
My 134th published book
Introduction to TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 1 for ages 5 through 26, math textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
My 134th published book
Introduction to TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 1 for ages 5 through 26, math textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
My 134th published book
Introduction to TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 1 for ages 5 through 26, math textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
My 134th published book
Introduction to TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 1 for ages 5 through 26, math textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
My 134th published book
Introduction to TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 1 for ages 5 through 26, math textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 300 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 101:55:45 |
| Calls: | 6,700 |
| Files: | 12,232 |
| Messages: | 5,350,035 |