1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. SCI.PHYSICS

  • Re: Musing on E=mc^2

    From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to Sylvia Else on Fri Mar 24 10:29:33 2023
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity

    Sylvia Else wrote:

    On 24-Mar-23 6:58 am, The Starmaker wrote:
    Sylvia Else wrote:

    Suppose we were still living without a theory of relativity, and the
    constant of proportionality between E and m had been determined
    experimentally.

    Someone might note that the constant had to have the dimension
    (length/time)^2, and then noticed that it was numerically close to c^2.

    Would their notion have been slapped down as nothing more than numerology? >>
    Sylvia.

    Well, it depends on the skin color and race and religion and whether it
    was a female.


    <sigh> I was expecting another piece of nonsense from Starmaker, but he
    could well be right in this.

    Sylvia.


    I don't recall *ever* posting "nonsense". So, Sylvia...are you sayin Einstein didn't first use a CucKoo-Clock for his Relativity????

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
    the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Fri Mar 24 10:37:22 2023
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity

    The Starmaker wrote:

    Sylvia Else wrote:

    On 24-Mar-23 6:58 am, The Starmaker wrote:
    Sylvia Else wrote:

    Suppose we were still living without a theory of relativity, and the
    constant of proportionality between E and m had been determined
    experimentally.

    Someone might note that the constant had to have the dimension
    (length/time)^2, and then noticed that it was numerically close to c^2. >>
    Would their notion have been slapped down as nothing more than numerology?

    Sylvia.

    Well, it depends on the skin color and race and religion and whether it was a female.


    <sigh> I was expecting another piece of nonsense from Starmaker, but he could well be right in this.

    Sylvia.

    I don't recall *ever* posting "nonsense". So, Sylvia...are you sayin Einstein didn't first use a CucKoo-Clock for his Relativity????


    you know, a clock where every hour a bird comes out and sez CucKoo
    CucKoo CucKoo!

    A CucKoo clock.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge
    the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Sat Mar 25 12:29:52 2023
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity

    The Starmaker wrote:

    The Starmaker wrote:

    Sylvia Else wrote:

    On 24-Mar-23 6:58 am, The Starmaker wrote:
    Sylvia Else wrote:

    Suppose we were still living without a theory of relativity, and the >> constant of proportionality between E and m had been determined
    experimentally.

    Someone might note that the constant had to have the dimension
    (length/time)^2, and then noticed that it was numerically close to c^2.

    Would their notion have been slapped down as nothing more than numerology?

    Sylvia.

    Well, it depends on the skin color and race and religion and whether it was a female.


    <sigh> I was expecting another piece of nonsense from Starmaker, but he could well be right in this.

    Sylvia.

    I don't recall *ever* posting "nonsense". So, Sylvia...are you sayin Einstein didn't first use a CucKoo-Clock for his Relativity????

    you know, a clock where every hour a bird comes out and sez CucKoo
    CucKoo CucKoo!

    A CucKoo clock.


    The *fact* is...
    what no one here wants to admit ..
    is that,
    it was a CucKoo-Clock
    where Albert Einstein
    produced Relativity from.

    CucKoo, CucKoo CucKoo, CucKoo CucKoo, CucKoo CucKoo, CucKoo CucKoo, CucKoo CucKoo, CucKoo

    Have you notice no one here ever mentioned that fact?


    They must be embarrassed.

    Or, is it possible...they simply not know?

    I would have to say not know AND embarrassed.


    you know, a clock where every hour a bird comes out and sez CucKoo
    CucKoo CucKoo...

    TickTok.

    CucKoo, CucKoo CucKoo, CucKoo CucKoo, CucKoo CucKoo, CucKoo CucKoo, CucKoo CucKoo, CucKoo


    Of course, I could go further...
    What kind of bird was it?
    a boy or a girl?

    a ...chicken??




    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
    the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Wed Mar 29 09:47:20 2023
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity

    The Starmaker wrote:

    The Starmaker wrote:

    The Starmaker wrote:

    The Starmaker wrote:

    Sylvia Else wrote:

    On 24-Mar-23 6:58 am, The Starmaker wrote:
    Sylvia Else wrote:

    Suppose we were still living without a theory of relativity, and the
    constant of proportionality between E and m had been determined
    experimentally.

    Someone might note that the constant had to have the dimension
    (length/time)^2, and then noticed that it was numerically close to c^2.

    Would their notion have been slapped down as nothing more than numerology?

    Sylvia.

    Well, it depends on the skin color and race and religion and whether it
    was a female.


    <sigh> I was expecting another piece of nonsense from Starmaker, but he
    could well be right in this.

    Sylvia.

    I don't recall *ever* posting "nonsense". So, Sylvia...are you sayin Einstein didn't first use a CucKoo-Clock for his Relativity????

    you know, a clock where every hour a bird comes out and sez CucKoo
    CucKoo CucKoo!

    A CucKoo clock.

    The *fact* is...
    what no one here wants to admit ..
    is that,
    it was a CucKoo-Clock
    where Albert Einstein
    produced Relativity from.

    CucKoo, CucKoo CucKoo, CucKoo CucKoo, CucKoo CucKoo, CucKoo CucKoo, CucKoo CucKoo, CucKoo

    Have you notice no one here ever mentioned that fact?

    They must be embarrassed.

    Or, is it possible...they simply not know?

    I would have to say not know AND embarrassed.

    you know, a clock where every hour a bird comes out and sez CucKoo
    CucKoo CucKoo...

    TickTok.

    CucKoo, CucKoo CucKoo, CucKoo CucKoo, CucKoo CucKoo, CucKoo CucKoo, CucKoo CucKoo, CucKoo

    Of course, I could go further...
    What kind of bird was it?
    a boy or a girl?

    a ...chicken??

    Now that everyone agrees that
    it was a CucKoo-Clock where Albert Einstein
    produced Relativity from...

    let's re-create Einstein's Clock experiment.

    He had two CucKoo-Clocks
    and he notice one CucKoo-Clock
    CucKoo a little quicker
    than the other
    CucKoo-Clock.

    In otherwords, the chicken
    said CucKoo CucKoo CucKoo
    before the other
    CucKoo-Clock.

    What caused the CucKoo-Clock
    to CucKoo a minute later?

    Time dialation?
    noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

    Maybe the Moon was pulling on the tides
    and the CucKoo-Clock at the same time.

    Gravitional.

    Since CucKoo-Clocks were considered
    the most accurate clocks ...then,
    then it made Einstein go...CucKoo.

    CucKoo, CucKoo CucKoo, CucKoo CucKoo, CucKoo CucKoo, CucKoo CucKoo, CucKoo CucKoo, CucKoo.

    (especially since he was given the assignment to work on train station CucKo0-Clocks)

    A job like that can make you go...CucKoo, CucKoo CucKoo, CucKoo CucKoo, CucKoo CucKoo, CucKoo CucKoo, CucKoo CucKoo, CucKoo.

    The fact is, the CucKoo-Clocks are not accurate. One CucKoo-Clock was
    always off by at least a minute. Not a second off, a whole minute.

    That's CucKoo!






    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge
    the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Wed Mar 29 09:37:25 2023
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity

    The Starmaker wrote:

    The Starmaker wrote:

    The Starmaker wrote:

    Sylvia Else wrote:

    On 24-Mar-23 6:58 am, The Starmaker wrote:
    Sylvia Else wrote:

    Suppose we were still living without a theory of relativity, and the >> constant of proportionality between E and m had been determined
    experimentally.

    Someone might note that the constant had to have the dimension
    (length/time)^2, and then noticed that it was numerically close to c^2.

    Would their notion have been slapped down as nothing more than numerology?

    Sylvia.

    Well, it depends on the skin color and race and religion and whether it
    was a female.


    <sigh> I was expecting another piece of nonsense from Starmaker, but he could well be right in this.

    Sylvia.

    I don't recall *ever* posting "nonsense". So, Sylvia...are you sayin Einstein didn't first use a CucKoo-Clock for his Relativity????

    you know, a clock where every hour a bird comes out and sez CucKoo
    CucKoo CucKoo!

    A CucKoo clock.

    The *fact* is...
    what no one here wants to admit ..
    is that,
    it was a CucKoo-Clock
    where Albert Einstein
    produced Relativity from.

    CucKoo, CucKoo CucKoo, CucKoo CucKoo, CucKoo CucKoo, CucKoo CucKoo, CucKoo CucKoo, CucKoo

    Have you notice no one here ever mentioned that fact?

    They must be embarrassed.

    Or, is it possible...they simply not know?

    I would have to say not know AND embarrassed.

    you know, a clock where every hour a bird comes out and sez CucKoo
    CucKoo CucKoo...

    TickTok.

    CucKoo, CucKoo CucKoo, CucKoo CucKoo, CucKoo CucKoo, CucKoo CucKoo, CucKoo CucKoo, CucKoo

    Of course, I could go further...
    What kind of bird was it?
    a boy or a girl?

    a ...chicken??

    Now that everyone agrees that
    it was a CucKoo-Clock where Albert Einstein
    produced Relativity from...

    let's re-create Einstein's Clock experiment.

    He had two CucKoo-Clocks
    and he notice one CucKoo-Clock
    CucKoo a little quicker
    than the other
    CucKoo-Clock.


    In otherwords, the chicken
    said CucKoo CucKoo CucKoo
    before the other
    CucKoo-Clock.

    What caused the CucKoo-Clock
    to CucKoo a minute later?

    Time dialation?
    noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

    Maybe the Moon was pulling on the tides
    and the CucKoo-Clock at the same time.

    Gravitional.



    Since CucKoo-Clocks were considered
    the most accurate clocks ...then,
    then it made Einstein go...CucKoo.


    CucKoo, CucKoo CucKoo, CucKoo CucKoo, CucKoo CucKoo, CucKoo CucKoo, CucKoo CucKoo, CucKoo.



    (especially since he was given the assignment to work on train station CucKo0-Clocks)


    A job like that can make you go...CucKoo, CucKoo CucKoo, CucKoo CucKoo, CucKoo CucKoo, CucKoo CucKoo, CucKoo CucKoo, CucKoo.










    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
    the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Wed Mar 29 22:03:41 2023
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity

    The Starmaker wrote:

    The Starmaker wrote:

    The Starmaker wrote:

    The Starmaker wrote:

    The Starmaker wrote:

    Sylvia Else wrote:

    On 24-Mar-23 6:58 am, The Starmaker wrote:
    Sylvia Else wrote:

    Suppose we were still living without a theory of relativity, and the
    constant of proportionality between E and m had been determined >> experimentally.

    Someone might note that the constant had to have the dimension >> (length/time)^2, and then noticed that it was numerically close to c^2.

    Would their notion have been slapped down as nothing more than numerology?

    Sylvia.

    Well, it depends on the skin color and race and religion and whether it
    was a female.


    <sigh> I was expecting another piece of nonsense from Starmaker, but he
    could well be right in this.

    Sylvia.

    I don't recall *ever* posting "nonsense". So, Sylvia...are you sayin Einstein didn't first use a CucKoo-Clock for his Relativity????

    you know, a clock where every hour a bird comes out and sez CucKoo CucKoo CucKoo!

    A CucKoo clock.

    The *fact* is...
    what no one here wants to admit ..
    is that,
    it was a CucKoo-Clock
    where Albert Einstein
    produced Relativity from.

    CucKoo, CucKoo CucKoo, CucKoo CucKoo, CucKoo CucKoo, CucKoo CucKoo, CucKoo CucKoo, CucKoo

    Have you notice no one here ever mentioned that fact?

    They must be embarrassed.

    Or, is it possible...they simply not know?

    I would have to say not know AND embarrassed.

    you know, a clock where every hour a bird comes out and sez CucKoo
    CucKoo CucKoo...

    TickTok.

    CucKoo, CucKoo CucKoo, CucKoo CucKoo, CucKoo CucKoo, CucKoo CucKoo, CucKoo CucKoo, CucKoo

    Of course, I could go further...
    What kind of bird was it?
    a boy or a girl?

    a ...chicken??

    Now that everyone agrees that
    it was a CucKoo-Clock where Albert Einstein
    produced Relativity from...

    let's re-create Einstein's Clock experiment.

    He had two CucKoo-Clocks
    and he notice one CucKoo-Clock
    CucKoo a little quicker
    than the other
    CucKoo-Clock.

    In otherwords, the chicken
    said CucKoo CucKoo CucKoo
    before the other
    CucKoo-Clock.

    What caused the CucKoo-Clock
    to CucKoo a minute later?

    Time dialation?
    noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

    Maybe the Moon was pulling on the tides
    and the CucKoo-Clock at the same time.

    Gravitional.

    Since CucKoo-Clocks were considered
    the most accurate clocks ...then,
    then it made Einstein go...CucKoo.

    CucKoo, CucKoo CucKoo, CucKoo CucKoo, CucKoo CucKoo, CucKoo CucKoo, CucKoo CucKoo, CucKoo.

    (especially since he was given the assignment to work on train station CucKo0-Clocks)

    A job like that can make you go...CucKoo, CucKoo CucKoo, CucKoo CucKoo, CucKoo CucKoo, CucKoo CucKoo, CucKoo CucKoo, CucKoo.

    The fact is, the CucKoo-Clocks are not accurate. One CucKoo-Clock was
    always off by at least a minute. Not a second off, a whole minute.

    That's CucKoo!

    Let's not forget that Albert Einstein was a Swiss citizen at that time...and the Swiss are known for making the best clocks.

    CucKoo CucKoo, CucKoo CucKoo


    I hope you kids are making a note of this, it's going to be on the test.


    Here is same sample question of what is going to be on the test:

    Where did Albert Einstein first produced Relativity from? Hint: CucKooCucKooCucKooCucKoo

    What type of clocks were the most accurate clocks in Albert Einstein's time? Hint: CucKoo CucKoo CucKoo.



    Don't worry children. I don't think you'll have any problems passing this test. Just think... CucKoo.


    (oh, one other note kids..your Physics teacher probably never took a Physics class)






    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
    the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Thu Mar 30 10:56:04 2023
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity

    The Starmaker wrote:

    The Starmaker wrote:

    The Starmaker wrote:

    The Starmaker wrote:

    The Starmaker wrote:

    The Starmaker wrote:

    Sylvia Else wrote:

    On 24-Mar-23 6:58 am, The Starmaker wrote:
    Sylvia Else wrote:

    Suppose we were still living without a theory of relativity, and the
    constant of proportionality between E and m had been determined
    experimentally.

    Someone might note that the constant had to have the dimension >> (length/time)^2, and then noticed that it was numerically close to c^2.

    Would their notion have been slapped down as nothing more than numerology?

    Sylvia.

    Well, it depends on the skin color and race and religion and whether it
    was a female.


    <sigh> I was expecting another piece of nonsense from Starmaker, but he
    could well be right in this.

    Sylvia.

    I don't recall *ever* posting "nonsense". So, Sylvia...are you sayin Einstein didn't first use a CucKoo-Clock for his Relativity????

    you know, a clock where every hour a bird comes out and sez CucKoo CucKoo CucKoo!

    A CucKoo clock.

    The *fact* is...
    what no one here wants to admit ..
    is that,
    it was a CucKoo-Clock
    where Albert Einstein
    produced Relativity from.

    CucKoo, CucKoo CucKoo, CucKoo CucKoo, CucKoo CucKoo, CucKoo CucKoo, CucKoo CucKoo, CucKoo

    Have you notice no one here ever mentioned that fact?

    They must be embarrassed.

    Or, is it possible...they simply not know?

    I would have to say not know AND embarrassed.

    you know, a clock where every hour a bird comes out and sez CucKoo
    CucKoo CucKoo...

    TickTok.

    CucKoo, CucKoo CucKoo, CucKoo CucKoo, CucKoo CucKoo, CucKoo CucKoo, CucKoo CucKoo, CucKoo

    Of course, I could go further...
    What kind of bird was it?
    a boy or a girl?

    a ...chicken??

    Now that everyone agrees that
    it was a CucKoo-Clock where Albert Einstein
    produced Relativity from...

    let's re-create Einstein's Clock experiment.

    He had two CucKoo-Clocks
    and he notice one CucKoo-Clock
    CucKoo a little quicker
    than the other
    CucKoo-Clock.

    In otherwords, the chicken
    said CucKoo CucKoo CucKoo
    before the other
    CucKoo-Clock.

    What caused the CucKoo-Clock
    to CucKoo a minute later?

    Time dialation?
    noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

    Maybe the Moon was pulling on the tides
    and the CucKoo-Clock at the same time.

    Gravitional.

    Since CucKoo-Clocks were considered
    the most accurate clocks ...then,
    then it made Einstein go...CucKoo.

    CucKoo, CucKoo CucKoo, CucKoo CucKoo, CucKoo CucKoo, CucKoo CucKoo, CucKoo CucKoo, CucKoo.

    (especially since he was given the assignment to work on train station CucKo0-Clocks)

    A job like that can make you go...CucKoo, CucKoo CucKoo, CucKoo CucKoo, CucKoo CucKoo, CucKoo CucKoo, CucKoo CucKoo, CucKoo.

    The fact is, the CucKoo-Clocks are not accurate. One CucKoo-Clock was always off by at least a minute. Not a second off, a whole minute.

    That's CucKoo!

    Let's not forget that Albert Einstein was a Swiss citizen at that time...and the Swiss are known for making the best clocks.

    CucKoo CucKoo, CucKoo CucKoo

    I hope you kids are making a note of this, it's going to be on the test.

    Here is same sample question of what is going to be on the test:

    Where did Albert Einstein first produced Relativity from? Hint: CucKooCucKooCucKooCucKoo

    What type of clocks were the most accurate clocks in Albert Einstein's time? Hint: CucKoo CucKoo CucKoo.

    Don't worry children. I don't think you'll have any problems passing this test. Just think... CucKoo.

    (oh, one other note kids..your Physics teacher probably never took a Physics class)

    btw, you kids in skool with a so-called Physics teacher...

    Only 1/3 of all high school physics teachers have a degree in physics or physics education.
    Almost 1/3 of all high school physics teachers have taken fewer than 3 college physics classes.
    90% of middle school students are taught physical science by a teacher lacking a major or certification in the physical sciences (chemistry, geology, general science or physics).
    Our local and regional school districts have had substantial difficulty finding and retaining qualified physics teachers. 52% of New York City high schools do not even offer physics.

    http://phystec.physics.cornell.edu/content/crisis-physics-education



    Tell your dumb Physics teacher to show you their credentials or tell them GET THE FUCK OUT OF HERE!!!!



    fake teachers.








    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
    the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)