A deuterium atom has a nucleus of a proton plus neutron with a single orbiting electron around the nucleus.bomb and solar energy.
When heat removes the orbiting electron then the deuterium ionizes, meaning it is mass with an electric charge.
That charge is from the positive charge in the nucleus. One proton is there with positive charge, and the neutron has no charge.
Okay so far?
Well, now, I follow the old thinking from the now obsolete theory that the nucleus of ANY atom is solely made up of protons and electrons.
Let us see where this leads to.
From this theory, it follows that a neutron is just a proton and an electron, bound tightly, so there is no net charge.
So a proton and an neutron is thus two protons and one electron, forming the nucleus of the deuterium atom; or the deuterium ion when the orbiting electron is removed. According to the old theory which I am reviving, following the facts of the hydrogen
Consider the electron holding two protons together. The two protons are straining to go away, but they are being held by the single charge which has at least two arms, say. One arm is holding one proton, another arm is holding the other one. proton-electron-proton is the configuration for the simple deuterium atom. The stretched nonzero length of the electron is just about right for the two protons to hang on, quite stably under normal circumstances.
For heavier elements, the structure will be much more complex. When the electrons cannot hold the protons together, there is a nuclear reaction and a mutation for the element with loss of some nuclear particles. Normal radiation, that.In the Sun and the stars, this happens naturally as great velocities to the disrupting ions are provided to the deuterium nuclei with the very powerful electromagnetic fields.
Now when the electron holding the two protons is suddenly removed, there is no doubt that the two protons will move off with great velocity, meaning create great kinetic energies as seen in hydrogen bombs and the sun.
How can that happen? As the abovementioned electron bonding between the protons is usually stable, it will need unusual methods to break the bond.
That is exactly what happens in the hydrogen bomb, which can only be initiated by a small fission bomb creating plenty of intense particles at high speed that can break that electron bond such that the electron holding the two protons simply snaps off.
The upshot is, this model provides a view to how the universe works, with no need for such nonsense as mass energy equivalence, a very hot core causing fusion, big bangs and black holes in a totally limited, warped, closed universe.
Sure as hell the E. characters will like this! Why they have not murdered me by now, is the wonder. Certainly, angels guard my rest.
Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee
On Thursday, March 23, 2023 at 5:10:18 AM UTC-4, Arindam Banerjee wrote:hydrogen bomb and solar energy.
A deuterium atom has a nucleus of a proton plus neutron with a single orbiting electron around the nucleus.
When heat removes the orbiting electron then the deuterium ionizes, meaning it is mass with an electric charge.
That charge is from the positive charge in the nucleus. One proton is there with positive charge, and the neutron has no charge.
Okay so far?
Well, now, I follow the old thinking from the now obsolete theory that the nucleus of ANY atom is solely made up of protons and electrons.
Let us see where this leads to.
From this theory, it follows that a neutron is just a proton and an electron, bound tightly, so there is no net charge.
So a proton and an neutron is thus two protons and one electron, forming the nucleus of the deuterium atom; or the deuterium ion when the orbiting electron is removed. According to the old theory which I am reviving, following the facts of the
electron-proton is the configuration for the simple deuterium atom. The stretched nonzero length of the electron is just about right for the two protons to hang on, quite stably under normal circumstances.Consider the electron holding two protons together. The two protons are straining to go away, but they are being held by the single charge which has at least two arms, say. One arm is holding one proton, another arm is holding the other one. proton-
off. In the Sun and the stars, this happens naturally as great velocities to the disrupting ions are provided to the deuterium nuclei with the very powerful electromagnetic fields.For heavier elements, the structure will be much more complex. When the electrons cannot hold the protons together, there is a nuclear reaction and a mutation for the element with loss of some nuclear particles. Normal radiation, that.
Now when the electron holding the two protons is suddenly removed, there is no doubt that the two protons will move off with great velocity, meaning create great kinetic energies as seen in hydrogen bombs and the sun.
How can that happen? As the abovementioned electron bonding between the protons is usually stable, it will need unusual methods to break the bond.
That is exactly what happens in the hydrogen bomb, which can only be initiated by a small fission bomb creating plenty of intense particles at high speed that can break that electron bond such that the electron holding the two protons simply snaps
A scientific response?The upshot is, this model provides a view to how the universe works, with no need for such nonsense as mass energy equivalence, a very hot core causing fusion, big bangs and black holes in a totally limited, warped, closed universe.
Sure as hell the E. characters will like this! Why they have not murdered me by now, is the wonder. Certainly, angels guard my rest.
Cheers,I think you are wrong.
Arindam Banerjee
You are admitting you are dead?Not yet.
Why would anyone do it?Evil rules.
On Thursday, March 23, 2023 at 5:10:18 AM UTC-4, Arindam Banerjee wrote:hydrogen bomb and solar energy.
A deuterium atom has a nucleus of a proton plus neutron with a single orbiting electron around the nucleus.
When heat removes the orbiting electron then the deuterium ionizes, meaning it is mass with an electric charge.
That charge is from the positive charge in the nucleus. One proton is there with positive charge, and the neutron has no charge.
Okay so far?
Well, now, I follow the old thinking from the now obsolete theory that the nucleus of ANY atom is solely made up of protons and electrons.
Let us see where this leads to.
From this theory, it follows that a neutron is just a proton and an electron, bound tightly, so there is no net charge.
So a proton and an neutron is thus two protons and one electron, forming the nucleus of the deuterium atom; or the deuterium ion when the orbiting electron is removed. According to the old theory which I am reviving, following the facts of the
electron-proton is the configuration for the simple deuterium atom. The stretched nonzero length of the electron is just about right for the two protons to hang on, quite stably under normal circumstances.Consider the electron holding two protons together. The two protons are straining to go away, but they are being held by the single charge which has at least two arms, say. One arm is holding one proton, another arm is holding the other one. proton-
off. In the Sun and the stars, this happens naturally as great velocities to the disrupting ions are provided to the deuterium nuclei with the very powerful electromagnetic fields.For heavier elements, the structure will be much more complex. When the electrons cannot hold the protons together, there is a nuclear reaction and a mutation for the element with loss of some nuclear particles. Normal radiation, that.
Now when the electron holding the two protons is suddenly removed, there is no doubt that the two protons will move off with great velocity, meaning create great kinetic energies as seen in hydrogen bombs and the sun.
How can that happen? As the abovementioned electron bonding between the protons is usually stable, it will need unusual methods to break the bond.
That is exactly what happens in the hydrogen bomb, which can only be initiated by a small fission bomb creating plenty of intense particles at high speed that can break that electron bond such that the electron holding the two protons simply snaps
The upshot is, this model provides a view to how the universe works, with no need for such nonsense as mass energy equivalence, a very hot core causing fusion, big bangs and black holes in a totally limited, warped, closed universe.
Sure as hell the E. characters will like this! Why they have not murdered me by now, is the wonder. Certainly, angels guard my rest.
Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee
I think you are wrong.
On 3/23/2023 10:23 PM, Paul Alsing wrote:
On Thursday, March 23, 2023 at 7:25:06 AM UTC-7, Andy Everett wrote:
On Thursday, March 23, 2023 at 5:10:18 AM UTC-4, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >>>> A deuterium atom has a nucleus of a proton plus neutron with a
single orbiting electron around the nucleus.
When heat removes the orbiting electron then the deuterium ionizes,
meaning it is mass with an electric charge.
That charge is from the positive charge in the nucleus. One proton
is there with positive charge, and the neutron has no charge.
Okay so far?
Well, now, I follow the old thinking from the now obsolete theory
that the nucleus of ANY atom is solely made up of protons and
electrons.
Let us see where this leads to.
From this theory, it follows that a neutron is just a proton and an
electron, bound tightly, so there is no net charge.
So a proton and an neutron is thus two protons and one electron,
forming the nucleus of the deuterium atom; or the deuterium ion when
the orbiting electron is removed. According to the old theory which
I am reviving, following the facts of the hydrogen bomb and solar
energy.
Consider the electron holding two protons together. The two protons
are straining to go away, but they are being held by the single
charge which has at least two arms, say. One arm is holding one
proton, another arm is holding the other one. proton-electron-proton
is the configuration for the simple deuterium atom. The stretched
nonzero length of the electron is just about right for the two
protons to hang on, quite stably under normal circumstances.
For heavier elements, the structure will be much more complex. When
the electrons cannot hold the protons together, there is a nuclear
reaction and a mutation for the element with loss of some nuclear
particles. Normal radiation, that.
Now when the electron holding the two protons is suddenly removed,
there is no doubt that the two protons will move off with great
velocity, meaning create great kinetic energies as seen in hydrogen
bombs and the sun.
How can that happen? As the abovementioned electron bonding between
the protons is usually stable, it will need unusual methods to break
the bond.
That is exactly what happens in the hydrogen bomb, which can only be
initiated by a small fission bomb creating plenty of intense
particles at high speed that can break that electron bond such that
the electron holding the two protons simply snaps off. In the Sun
and the stars, this happens naturally as great velocities to the
disrupting ions are provided to the deuterium nuclei with the very
powerful electromagnetic fields.
The upshot is, this model provides a view to how the universe works,
with no need for such nonsense as mass energy equivalence, a very
hot core causing fusion, big bangs and black holes in a totally
limited, warped, closed universe.
Sure as hell the E. characters will like this! Why they have not
murdered me by now, is the wonder. Certainly, angels guard my rest.
Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee
I think you are wrong.
I *know* he is wrong. He is *always* wrong. He makes wild claims
without ever supplying any evidence at all.
It's a matter of who is wrong more often: Banerjee or Plutonium. Maybe
that's why they're involved in an ongoing kO0kfight -- it's a contest
between them.
On Thursday, March 23, 2023 at 7:25:06 AM UTC-7, Andy Everett wrote:hydrogen bomb and solar energy.
On Thursday, March 23, 2023 at 5:10:18 AM UTC-4, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >>> A deuterium atom has a nucleus of a proton plus neutron with a single orbiting electron around the nucleus.
When heat removes the orbiting electron then the deuterium ionizes, meaning it is mass with an electric charge.
That charge is from the positive charge in the nucleus. One proton is there with positive charge, and the neutron has no charge.
Okay so far?
Well, now, I follow the old thinking from the now obsolete theory that the nucleus of ANY atom is solely made up of protons and electrons.
Let us see where this leads to.
From this theory, it follows that a neutron is just a proton and an electron, bound tightly, so there is no net charge.
So a proton and an neutron is thus two protons and one electron, forming the nucleus of the deuterium atom; or the deuterium ion when the orbiting electron is removed. According to the old theory which I am reviving, following the facts of the
electron-proton is the configuration for the simple deuterium atom. The stretched nonzero length of the electron is just about right for the two protons to hang on, quite stably under normal circumstances.
Consider the electron holding two protons together. The two protons are straining to go away, but they are being held by the single charge which has at least two arms, say. One arm is holding one proton, another arm is holding the other one. proton-
off. In the Sun and the stars, this happens naturally as great velocities to the disrupting ions are provided to the deuterium nuclei with the very powerful electromagnetic fields.
For heavier elements, the structure will be much more complex. When the electrons cannot hold the protons together, there is a nuclear reaction and a mutation for the element with loss of some nuclear particles. Normal radiation, that.
Now when the electron holding the two protons is suddenly removed, there is no doubt that the two protons will move off with great velocity, meaning create great kinetic energies as seen in hydrogen bombs and the sun.
How can that happen? As the abovementioned electron bonding between the protons is usually stable, it will need unusual methods to break the bond.
That is exactly what happens in the hydrogen bomb, which can only be initiated by a small fission bomb creating plenty of intense particles at high speed that can break that electron bond such that the electron holding the two protons simply snaps
The upshot is, this model provides a view to how the universe works, with no need for such nonsense as mass energy equivalence, a very hot core causing fusion, big bangs and black holes in a totally limited, warped, closed universe.
Sure as hell the E. characters will like this! Why they have not murdered me by now, is the wonder. Certainly, angels guard my rest.
Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee
I think you are wrong.
I *know* he is wrong. He is *always* wrong. He makes wild claims without ever supplying any evidence at all.
On Friday, 24 March 2023 at 07:27:21 UTC+11, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:As evident from the line-up of the local thugs in this thread.
You are admitting you are dead?Not yet.
Why would anyone do it?Evil rules.
On Friday, 24 March 2023 at 01:25:06 UTC+11, Andy Everett wrote:hydrogen bomb and solar energy.
On Thursday, March 23, 2023 at 5:10:18 AM UTC-4, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
A deuterium atom has a nucleus of a proton plus neutron with a single orbiting electron around the nucleus.
When heat removes the orbiting electron then the deuterium ionizes, meaning it is mass with an electric charge.
That charge is from the positive charge in the nucleus. One proton is there with positive charge, and the neutron has no charge.
Okay so far?
Well, now, I follow the old thinking from the now obsolete theory that the nucleus of ANY atom is solely made up of protons and electrons.
Let us see where this leads to.
From this theory, it follows that a neutron is just a proton and an electron, bound tightly, so there is no net charge.
So a proton and an neutron is thus two protons and one electron, forming the nucleus of the deuterium atom; or the deuterium ion when the orbiting electron is removed. According to the old theory which I am reviving, following the facts of the
electron-proton is the configuration for the simple deuterium atom. The stretched nonzero length of the electron is just about right for the two protons to hang on, quite stably under normal circumstances.Consider the electron holding two protons together. The two protons are straining to go away, but they are being held by the single charge which has at least two arms, say. One arm is holding one proton, another arm is holding the other one. proton-
off. In the Sun and the stars, this happens naturally as great velocities to the disrupting ions are provided to the deuterium nuclei with the very powerful electromagnetic fields.For heavier elements, the structure will be much more complex. When the electrons cannot hold the protons together, there is a nuclear reaction and a mutation for the element with loss of some nuclear particles. Normal radiation, that.
Now when the electron holding the two protons is suddenly removed, there is no doubt that the two protons will move off with great velocity, meaning create great kinetic energies as seen in hydrogen bombs and the sun.
How can that happen? As the abovementioned electron bonding between the protons is usually stable, it will need unusual methods to break the bond.
That is exactly what happens in the hydrogen bomb, which can only be initiated by a small fission bomb creating plenty of intense particles at high speed that can break that electron bond such that the electron holding the two protons simply snaps
The upshot is, this model provides a view to how the universe works, with no need for such nonsense as mass energy equivalence, a very hot core causing fusion, big bangs and black holes in a totally limited, warped, closed universe.
Sure as hell the E. characters will like this! Why they have not murdered me by now, is the wonder. Certainly, angels guard my rest.
A scientific response?Cheers,I think you are wrong.
Arindam Banerjee
On Thursday, March 23, 2023 at 2:28:07 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote:hydrogen bomb and solar energy.
On Friday, 24 March 2023 at 01:25:06 UTC+11, Andy Everett wrote:
On Thursday, March 23, 2023 at 5:10:18 AM UTC-4, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
A deuterium atom has a nucleus of a proton plus neutron with a single orbiting electron around the nucleus.
When heat removes the orbiting electron then the deuterium ionizes, meaning it is mass with an electric charge.
That charge is from the positive charge in the nucleus. One proton is there with positive charge, and the neutron has no charge.
Okay so far?
Well, now, I follow the old thinking from the now obsolete theory that the nucleus of ANY atom is solely made up of protons and electrons.
Let us see where this leads to.
From this theory, it follows that a neutron is just a proton and an electron, bound tightly, so there is no net charge.
So a proton and an neutron is thus two protons and one electron, forming the nucleus of the deuterium atom; or the deuterium ion when the orbiting electron is removed. According to the old theory which I am reviving, following the facts of the
proton-electron-proton is the configuration for the simple deuterium atom. The stretched nonzero length of the electron is just about right for the two protons to hang on, quite stably under normal circumstances.Consider the electron holding two protons together. The two protons are straining to go away, but they are being held by the single charge which has at least two arms, say. One arm is holding one proton, another arm is holding the other one.
snaps off. In the Sun and the stars, this happens naturally as great velocities to the disrupting ions are provided to the deuterium nuclei with the very powerful electromagnetic fields.For heavier elements, the structure will be much more complex. When the electrons cannot hold the protons together, there is a nuclear reaction and a mutation for the element with loss of some nuclear particles. Normal radiation, that.
Now when the electron holding the two protons is suddenly removed, there is no doubt that the two protons will move off with great velocity, meaning create great kinetic energies as seen in hydrogen bombs and the sun.
How can that happen? As the abovementioned electron bonding between the protons is usually stable, it will need unusual methods to break the bond.
That is exactly what happens in the hydrogen bomb, which can only be initiated by a small fission bomb creating plenty of intense particles at high speed that can break that electron bond such that the electron holding the two protons simply
Angels. I do not know them but they exist to protect me, in mortal form.The upshot is, this model provides a view to how the universe works, with no need for such nonsense as mass energy equivalence, a very hot core causing fusion, big bangs and black holes in a totally limited, warped, closed universe.
Sure as hell the E. characters will like this! Why they have not murdered me by now, is the wonder. Certainly, angels guard my rest.
What is your angel then AB?A scientific response?Cheers,I think you are wrong.
Arindam Banerjee
How scientific is that?As scientific as my continued existence among the robotswine.
Mitchell Raemsch
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 300 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 105:56:51 |
| Calls: | 6,700 |
| Files: | 12,232 |
| Messages: | 5,350,363 |