QM in its central principle shows how
uncertain science has been. Einstein
knew QM would take a correction...
How can we get anywhere if
measurements are so uncertain?
And he had a God. God was his God.
Personal and impersonal.
Mitchell Raemsch
mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchr...@gmail.com> wrote:
QM in its central principle shows how
uncertain science has been. Einstein
knew QM would take a correction...
How can we get anywhere if
measurements are so uncertain?
And he had a God. God was his God.
Personal and impersonal.
Mitchell RaemschThe measured value of the gravitational constant, which is one of the
most difficult values to measure, has a current uncertainty of 46 parts
per million or 0.0046%.
Many physical values are known to uncertainties that are less by orders
of magnitude than 1 part in 10^10.
So where do you get your idiotic nonsense that "measurements are so uncertain", moron?
On Monday, March 20, 2023 at 11:31:08 AM UTC-7, Jim Pennino wrote:
mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchr...@gmail.com> wrote:
QM in its central principle shows howThe measured value of the gravitational constant, which is one of the
uncertain science has been. Einstein
knew QM would take a correction...
How can we get anywhere if
measurements are so uncertain?
And he had a God. God was his God.
Personal and impersonal.
Mitchell Raemsch
most difficult values to measure, has a current uncertainty of 46 parts
per million or 0.0046%.
Doesnt science need to know that constant exact before you could
predict how close to certain it is.
The uncertainty principle of QM shows how
uncertain science has been.
On 21-Mar-23 11:25 am, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, March 20, 2023 at 11:31:08 AM UTC-7, Jim Pennino wrote:
mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchr...@gmail.com> wrote:
QM in its central principle shows howThe measured value of the gravitational constant, which is one of the
uncertain science has been. Einstein
knew QM would take a correction...
How can we get anywhere if
measurements are so uncertain?
And he had a God. God was his God.
Personal and impersonal.
Mitchell Raemsch
most difficult values to measure, has a current uncertainty of 46 parts >> per million or 0.0046%.
Doesnt science need to know that constant exact before you couldWhy would you think that? Get out a metre rule and measure the height of your desk. You know the result isn't exact, so you don't know the
predict how close to certain it is.
precise height of your desk. But you can still look at the scale of your metre rule and conclude that you know the desk height to within a millimetre, or about 1 part in 750.
The uncertainty principle of QM shows howThe uncertainty principle relates to how the universe itself works, not
uncertain science has been.
to our inability to measure it precisely.
Sylvia.
Sylvia Else wrote:
On 21-Mar-23 11:25 am, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, March 20, 2023 at 11:31:08 AM UTC-7, Jim Pennino wrote:
mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchr...@gmail.com> wrote:
QM in its central principle shows howThe measured value of the gravitational constant, which is one of the >> most difficult values to measure, has a current uncertainty of 46 parts >> per million or 0.0046%.
uncertain science has been. Einstein
knew QM would take a correction...
How can we get anywhere if
measurements are so uncertain?
And he had a God. God was his God.
Personal and impersonal.
Mitchell Raemsch
Doesnt science need to know that constant exact before you could
predict how close to certain it is.
Why would you think that? Get out a metre rule and measure the height of your desk. You know the result isn't exact, so you don't know the
precise height of your desk. But you can still look at the scale of your metre rule and conclude that you know the desk height to within a millimetre, or about 1 part in 750.
The uncertainty principle of QM shows how
uncertain science has been.
The uncertainty principle relates to how the universe itself works, not
to our inability to measure it precisely.
Sylvia.How the uncertainty principle universe itself works has made your ability to measure it precisely, ineffective.
It's in the cards.
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
the unchallengeable.
On 21-Mar-23 11:25 am, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, March 20, 2023 at 11:31:08 AM UTC-7, Jim Pennino wrote:
mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchr...@gmail.com> wrote:
QM in its central principle shows howThe measured value of the gravitational constant, which is one of the
uncertain science has been. Einstein
knew QM would take a correction...
How can we get anywhere if
measurements are so uncertain?
And he had a God. God was his God.
Personal and impersonal.
Mitchell Raemsch
most difficult values to measure, has a current uncertainty of 46 parts
per million or 0.0046%.
Doesnt science need to know that constant exact before you could
predict how close to certain it is.
Why would you think that? Get out a metre rule and measure the height of
your desk. You know the result isn't exact, so you don't know the
precise height of your desk. But you can still look at the scale of your metre rule and conclude that you know the desk height to within a
millimetre, or about 1 part in 750.
The uncertainty principle of QM shows how
uncertain science has been.
The uncertainty principle relates to how the universe itself works, not
to our inability to measure it precisely.
Sylvia.
On Monday, March 20, 2023 at 11:31:08 AM UTC-7, Jim Pennino wrote:
mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchr...@gmail.com> wrote:
QM in its central principle shows howThe measured value of the gravitational constant, which is one of the
uncertain science has been. Einstein
knew QM would take a correction...
How can we get anywhere if
measurements are so uncertain?
And he had a God. God was his God.
Personal and impersonal.
Mitchell Raemsch
most difficult values to measure, has a current uncertainty of 46 parts
per million or 0.0046%.
Doesnt science need to know that constant exact before you could
predict how close to certain it is.
On Monday, March 20, 2023 at 10:22:44 PM UTC-7, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
On Tuesday, 21 March 2023 at 03:44:57 UTC+1, The Starmaker wrote:
Sylvia Else wrote:
On 21-Mar-23 11:25 am, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, March 20, 2023 at 11:31:08 AM UTC-7, Jim Pennino wrote:
mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchr...@gmail.com> wrote:
QM in its central principle shows howThe measured value of the gravitational constant, which is one of the
uncertain science has been. Einstein
knew QM would take a correction...
How can we get anywhere if
measurements are so uncertain?
And he had a God. God was his God.
Personal and impersonal.
Mitchell Raemsch
most difficult values to measure, has a current uncertainty of 46 parts
per million or 0.0046%.
Doesnt science need to know that constant exact before you could predict how close to certain it is.
Why would you think that? Get out a metre rule and measure the height of
your desk. You know the result isn't exact, so you don't know the precise height of your desk. But you can still look at the scale of your
metre rule and conclude that you know the desk height to within a millimetre, or about 1 part in 750.
The uncertainty principle of QM shows how
uncertain science has been.
The uncertainty principle relates to how the universe itself works, not to our inability to measure it precisely.
Sylvia.
How the uncertainty principle universe itself works has madeStop fucking. "uncertainty principle" is how
physicists work, the universe has nothing to do it.
The uncertainty principle is about the limitations
of scientific measurement and why they
do not ever go accurate.
Mitchell Raemsch
mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, March 20, 2023 at 10:22:44 PM UTC-7, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
On Tuesday, 21 March 2023 at 03:44:57 UTC+1, The Starmaker wrote:
Sylvia Else wrote:
On 21-Mar-23 11:25 am, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, March 20, 2023 at 11:31:08 AM UTC-7, Jim Pennino wrote:
mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchr...@gmail.com> wrote:
QM in its central principle shows howThe measured value of the gravitational constant, which is one of the
uncertain science has been. Einstein
knew QM would take a correction...
How can we get anywhere if
measurements are so uncertain?
And he had a God. God was his God.
Personal and impersonal.
Mitchell Raemsch
most difficult values to measure, has a current uncertainty of 46 parts
per million or 0.0046%.
Doesnt science need to know that constant exact before you could predict how close to certain it is.
Why would you think that? Get out a metre rule and measure the height of
your desk. You know the result isn't exact, so you don't know the precise height of your desk. But you can still look at the scale of your
metre rule and conclude that you know the desk height to within a millimetre, or about 1 part in 750.
The uncertainty principle of QM shows how
uncertain science has been.
The uncertainty principle relates to how the universe itself works, not
to our inability to measure it precisely.
Sylvia.
How the uncertainty principle universe itself works has madeStop fucking. "uncertainty principle" is how
physicists work, the universe has nothing to do it.
The uncertainty principle is about the limitations
of scientific measurement and why they
do not ever go accurate.
Mitchell Raemsch
The uncertainty principle (the I Don't Know Principle) is not
about the limitations of measurements, it' about the
limitations of intelligence.
It begins with certaintly...but someone, somewhere moved the dial knob from certaintly to uncertainty.
So, when you read it..it reads 'uncertaintly'.
That is where the control knob is set at, 'uncertaintly'.
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
the unchallengeable.
mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchr...@gmail.com> wrote:
<snip crap>
By science's central principle its very uncertainty is revealed. Measurement can never go accurate.Define accurate moron.
Mitchell Raemsch
On Wednesday, March 22, 2023 at 11:31:09 AM UTC-7, Jim Pennino wrote:
mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchr...@gmail.com> wrote:
<snip crap>
By science's central principle its very uncertainty is revealed.Define accurate moron.
Measurement can never go accurate.
What science does not have...
Not inaccurate. or precise or certain.
Uncertainty science principle shows
why certainty never applies for scientific
measurement.
Mitchell Raemsch
Mitchell Raemsch
mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchr...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wednesday, March 22, 2023 at 11:31:09 AM UTC-7, Jim Pennino wrote:
mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchr...@gmail.com> wrote:
<snip crap>
By science's central principle its very uncertainty is revealed.Define accurate moron.
Measurement can never go accurate.
What science does not have...As suspected, you haven't a clue what the word accurate means, moron.
Not inaccurate. or precise or certain.
Uncertainty science principle shows
why certainty never applies for scientific
measurement.
Mitchell Raemsch
Mitchell Raemsch
By science's central principle its very uncertainty is revealed.
Measurement can never go accurate.
Mitchell Raemsch
On Wednesday, March 22, 2023 at 12:01:08 PM UTC-7, Jim Pennino wrote:
mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchr...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wednesday, March 22, 2023 at 11:31:09 AM UTC-7, Jim Pennino wrote:As suspected, you haven't a clue what the word accurate means, moron.
mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchr...@gmail.com> wrote:
<snip crap>
By science's central principle its very uncertainty is revealed.Define accurate moron.
Measurement can never go accurate.
What science does not have...
Not inaccurate. or precise or certain.
Uncertainty science principle shows
why certainty never applies for scientific
measurement.
Can you prove science is accurate if its central principle is uncertainty
for measurement?
mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> wrote:
<snip crap>
By science's central principle its very uncertainty is revealed. Measurement can never go accurate.
Define accurate moron.
Mitchell Raemsch
mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchr...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wednesday, March 22, 2023 at 12:01:08 PM UTC-7, Jim Pennino wrote:
mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchr...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wednesday, March 22, 2023 at 11:31:09 AM UTC-7, Jim Pennino wrote: >> >> mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchr...@gmail.com> wrote:As suspected, you haven't a clue what the word accurate means, moron.
<snip crap>
By science's central principle its very uncertainty is revealed.Define accurate moron.
Measurement can never go accurate.
What science does not have...
Not inaccurate. or precise or certain.
Uncertainty science principle shows
why certainty never applies for scientific
measurement.
Can you prove science is accurate if its central principle is uncertainty for measurement?And again, you haven't a clue what the word accurate means, nor do you
have the slightest clue what the uncertainty means, moron.
Jim Pennino wrote:
mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchr...@gmail.com> wrote:
<snip crap>
By science's central principle its very uncertainty is revealed. Measurement can never go accurate.
Define accurate moron.
An accurate moron is an oxymoron.Mitchell Raemsch
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
the unchallengeable.
On Wednesday, March 22, 2023 at 4:13:38 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
Jim Pennino wrote:
An accurate moron is an oxymoron.
mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchr...@gmail.com> wrote:
<snip crap>
By science's central principle its very uncertainty is revealed.
Measurement can never go accurate.
Define accurate moron.
Mitchell Raemsch
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
the unchallengeable.
I upset jim... that is why he follows me around wherever he can...
On Wednesday, March 22, 2023 at 2:16:09 PM UTC-7, Jim Pennino wrote:
mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchr...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wednesday, March 22, 2023 at 12:01:08 PM UTC-7, Jim Pennino wrote:And again, you haven't a clue what the word accurate means, nor do you
mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchr...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wednesday, March 22, 2023 at 11:31:09 AM UTC-7, Jim Pennino wrote: >> >> >> mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchr...@gmail.com> wrote:As suspected, you haven't a clue what the word accurate means, moron.
<snip crap>
By science's central principle its very uncertainty is revealed.Define accurate moron.
Measurement can never go accurate.
What science does not have...
Not inaccurate. or precise or certain.
Uncertainty science principle shows
why certainty never applies for scientific
measurement.
Can you prove science is accurate if its central principle is uncertainty >> > for measurement?
have the slightest clue what the uncertainty means, moron.
How accurate are you?
sciences principle shows how imprecise or how uncertain
it has been... you can't know how uncertain you are without
having certainty first. And by QM principle science can not do
that certainty. QM uncertainty principle says all measurement
will remain uncertain. Therefore QM has no certain way
to know uncertainty math. The math of momentum and
position in QM theory is not giving science what it thinks.
Because momentum is a form of position itself.
You are comparing position change with position.
And that doesn't give you anything if they are both the
same thing being compared to itself... position is position
and it is never known without uncertainty and that is the QM rule.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 300 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 107:28:58 |
| Calls: | 6,700 |
| Files: | 12,232 |
| Messages: | 5,348,419 |