1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. SCI.PHYSICS

  • The tachyon is a negative form

    From mitchrae3323@gmail.com@21:1/5 to All on Fri Mar 10 12:15:10 2023
    its energy is negative because of that.
    Some have argued against its anti reality.
    Why would energy not be negative
    where its time is by the Gamma factor.
    Negative energy coming from the future
    annihilates. But We observe no bursts.
    Tachyon don't exist. What is the real
    evidence if you insist they do?

    Mitchell Raemsch

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Pennino@21:1/5 to mitchr...@gmail.com on Fri Mar 10 12:23:38 2023
    mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> wrote:
    its energy is negative because of that.
    Some have argued against its anti reality.
    Why would energy not be negative
    where its time is by the Gamma factor.
    Negative energy coming from the future
    annihilates. But We observe no bursts.
    Tachyon don't exist. What is the real
    evidence if you insist they do?

    Mitchell Raemsch

    And again, moron babble gibberish.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From mitchrae3323@gmail.com@21:1/5 to Jim Pennino on Fri Mar 24 13:54:32 2023
    On Friday, March 10, 2023 at 12:31:09 PM UTC-8, Jim Pennino wrote:
    mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchr...@gmail.com> wrote:
    its energy is negative because of that.
    Some have argued against its anti reality.
    Why would energy not be negative
    where its time is by the Gamma factor.
    Negative energy coming from the future
    annihilates. But We observe no bursts.
    Tachyon don't exist. What is the real
    evidence if you insist they do?

    Mitchell Raemsch

    tachyon's Gamma is for its negative time-energy math...
    the positive particle atom and it will annihilate.

    Mitchell Raemsch

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Pennino@21:1/5 to mitchr...@gmail.com on Fri Mar 24 14:03:56 2023
    mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Friday, March 10, 2023 at 12:31:09 PM UTC-8, Jim Pennino wrote:
    mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchr...@gmail.com> wrote:
    its energy is negative because of that.
    Some have argued against its anti reality.
    Why would energy not be negative
    where its time is by the Gamma factor.
    Negative energy coming from the future
    annihilates. But We observe no bursts.
    Tachyon don't exist. What is the real
    evidence if you insist they do?

    Mitchell Raemsch

    tachyon's Gamma is for its negative time-energy math...
    the positive particle atom and it will annihilate.

    Yet more meaningless, word salad moron babble.


    Mitchell Raemsch

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From mitchrae3323@gmail.com@21:1/5 to Jim Pennino on Fri Mar 24 14:40:55 2023
    On Friday, March 24, 2023 at 2:16:09 PM UTC-7, Jim Pennino wrote:
    mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchr...@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Friday, March 10, 2023 at 12:31:09 PM UTC-8, Jim Pennino wrote:
    mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchr...@gmail.com> wrote:
    its energy is negative because of that.
    Some have argued against its anti reality.
    Why would energy not be negative
    where its time is by the Gamma factor.
    Negative energy coming from the future
    annihilates. But We observe no bursts.
    Tachyon don't exist. What is the real
    evidence if you insist they do?

    Mitchell Raemsch

    tachyon's Gamma is for its negative time-energy math...
    the positive particle atom and it will annihilate.
    Yet more meaningless, word salad moron babble.

    What do you mean jim? Why are you saying it over and over?
    You haven't won any argument.



    Mitchell Raemsch

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Pennino@21:1/5 to mitchr...@gmail.com on Fri Mar 24 16:02:00 2023
    mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Friday, March 24, 2023 at 2:16:09 PM UTC-7, Jim Pennino wrote:
    mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchr...@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Friday, March 10, 2023 at 12:31:09 PM UTC-8, Jim Pennino wrote:
    mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchr...@gmail.com> wrote:
    its energy is negative because of that.
    Some have argued against its anti reality.
    Why would energy not be negative
    where its time is by the Gamma factor.
    Negative energy coming from the future
    annihilates. But We observe no bursts.
    Tachyon don't exist. What is the real
    evidence if you insist they do?

    Mitchell Raemsch

    tachyon's Gamma is for its negative time-energy math...
    the positive particle atom and it will annihilate.
    Yet more meaningless, word salad moron babble.

    What do you mean jim? Why are you saying it over and over?

    I mean you are a babbling moron and everything you post is meaningless
    word salad.

    Word salad is a bunch of words dumped together that mean nothing.

    You haven't won any argument.

    Of course not as I am not wasting any effort to argue with your
    meaningless babble.

    Mitchell Raemsch

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)