• Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a l

    From Volney@21:1/5 to All on Wed Feb 22 01:29:09 2023
    ๐Ÿ of Math and ๐Ÿ€ of Physics Archimedes "necrophile" Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails at math and science:
    corpse fucking-- >

    It's time for your punishment again, Pluto?

    Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> tards:

    "I want to fuck her corpse"

    Plutonium, you sick fuck, I know you said you love the Queen, but that
    is /NOT/ how to express your love for her!!!

    "I want to fuck her corpse"

    You sicko! Why do you keep saying that?

    I want to fuck her corpse

    Pluto, you are really, really, really SICK!

    wanting to fuck her corpse

    I want to fuck her corpse

    Arky, don't you think she's a bit too, err, ripe for that by now?

    I want to fuck her corpse

    PLEASE see a mental health professional before some funeral home owner
    shoots you in the middle of the night! (and for all of your MANY other "issues"!!)


    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Volney@21:1/5 to All on Sun Mar 5 23:59:32 2023
    ๐Ÿคช of Math and ๐Ÿ˜ตโ€๐Ÿ’ซ of Physics Archimedes "CCP's minion" Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails at math and science:
    The new math concept of Rhombus Focal Points

    I searched the math literature and found no focal points for Rhom

    The letters in "Archimedes Plutonium" can be re-arranged to spell "Posh numerical tedium!"

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Volney@21:1/5 to All on Sun Mar 12 04:29:17 2023
    Blowfly of Math and Botfly of Physics Archimedes "spamtard" Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> tarded:

    Hello everyone, AP is back up and running, thank you, and AP will only post to his own newsgroup with new items. Only post notices of new books published in sci.math or sci.physics.

    That didn't last very long, did it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Volney@21:1/5 to All on Thu Apr 13 23:36:33 2023
    ๐Ÿคก of Math and ๐Ÿƒ of Physics Archimedes "bozo" Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails at math and science:

    Engineering Challenge of 2023

    My lithium ion battery to mow the lawn or operate the chain saw is 4 kg. I myself weigh in at 84Kg.
    [...]
    My lithium ion battery to mow the lawn or operate the chain saw is 2 kg. I myself weigh in at 72Kg.

    Wow, in just 8 minutes your weight went from 84 kg to 72 kg. How did you
    do that? Did you use your chain saw to remove a limb?
    But how did you cut the weight of the battery in half?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Volney@21:1/5 to All on Sat Apr 29 20:07:48 2023
    ๐Ÿ‘Ž๐Ÿผ of Math and ๐Ÿ–•๐Ÿผ of Physics Archimedes "๐Ÿฆ‡๐Ÿ’ฉ crazy" Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails at math and science:

    Math morons Dr.Hales,Dr.Tao,Dr.Wiles,Dr.Stillwell,

    How can Dr. Tao be a "math moron" if Dr. Tao is the undisputed King of Mathematics? And the other two right behind him?

    when William and Wolfgang Mueckenheim, Olcott & Damon when are they and you going to admit slant cut of cone is Oval, never ellipse.

    Why would *anyone* do anything as dumb and stoopid like claim the slant
    cut of a cone is never an ellipse? How can anyone "admit" a falsehood?
    Even the ancient Greeks knew the slant cut of a cone is an ellipse. It's perfectly clear the ellipse has two axes of symmetry, just that one
    isn't along the cone axis.

    So are you going to remain as math failure morons always???

    I don't know about anyone else, but it appears to me that you have no
    future other than as a math failure moron.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Archimedes Plutonium@21:1/5 to Volney on Sat Apr 29 18:30:57 2023
    Re:Kibo> I want to fuck her corpse>AMS Jill Pipher, Ruth Charney, Harvard's Dr.Lisa Randall, Dr.Hau,CIA Kate Heinzelman, MIT's Anette Hosoi,Cynthia Barnhart
    by Augวl Jan 1, 2023, 7:41:27 AM

    Kibo Parry aka Moroney aka Volney the 30 year paid stalker
    On Saturday, April 29, 2023 at 7:07:48โ€ฏPM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
    On Saturday, April 29, 2023 at 6:52:43โ€ฏPM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
    "Village Idiot

    I don't know about anyone else, but it appears to me that you have no
    future other than as a math failure moron.
    On Sunday, May 30, 2021 at 5:55:39โ€ฏPM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
    Re: Kibo on > I want to fuck her corpse > AMS Jill Pipher, Ruth Charney, Harvard's Dr.Lisa Randall, Dr.Hau,CIA Kate Heinzelman, MIT's Anette Hosoi,Cynthia Barnhart
    by Augวl Jan 1, 2023, 7:41:27 AM

    On Sunday, May 30, 2021 at 5:55:39โ€ฏPM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
    "little fish"

    Kibo_I want to fuck her corpse-Dr.Lisa Randall, Dr.Hau,CIA Kate Heinzelman, MIT's Anette Hosoi,Cynthia Barnhart
    On Sunday, September 11, 2022 at 12:07:15 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
    I want to fuck her corpse
    On Sunday, April 16, 2023 at 2:26:54โ€ฏPM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
    Wood louse of Math and Bathynomus giganteus of Physics
    tarded:

    ๎—“
    On Thursday, January 26, 2023 at 10:55:02 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote: >"certifiably insane"
    fails at math and science:
    "I want to fuck her corpse"
    "I want to fuck her corpse"
    Not again!
    I want to fuck her corpse

    You sicko! Why do you keep saying that?

    wanting to fuck her corpse

    I want to fuck her corpse

    I want to fuck her corpse


    NSF Dr.Panchanathan, Harvard's Sheldon Glashow, Peter Higgs ever ask the question, which is the atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle which AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole while the real electron is a muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton
    torus doing the Faraday law. In fact so stupid is this list of so called physicists that they went through life believing the slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, when in reality it is a Oval of 1 axis of symmetry for the cone has 1 axis of symmetry
    but ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry. The minds of all these so called physicists are not good enough to be doing physics. In fact, so stupid in science and math are all these people that when told in High School or College that a slant cut in single
    cone is a ellipse, they believed it, and believe in it to this day without so much as ever questioning the idea that a single cone and oval have just 1 axis of symmetry while ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry, and yet many on this list were awarded
    science prizes. Maybe for ignorance of science but not for truth of science.

    1) Too stupid to question if Thomson found Dirac's magnetic monopole and not the electron of atoms.
    2) Too stupid to realize that in the Rutherford,Geiger, Marsden Experiment when you have increase in velocity of bounce back alpha particles means head on collision with a larger proton torus, hence, the interior of gold atoms are toruses, no nucleus.
    3) Too stupid in logic to understand subatomic particles have jobs and tasks to do, not sit around on beaches sipping lemonade what Old Physics says. The proton is a 8 ring torus with muon as electron inside doing the Faraday law producing new
    electricity.
    4) Too stupid to understand stars and our Sun shine not from fusion but from Faraday law of each and every atom inside that star.

    5) think a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse when it is proven to be a Oval, never the ellipse. For the cone and oval have 1 axis of symmetry, while ellipse has 2.
    6) think Boole logic is correct with AND truth table being TFFF when it really is TTTF in order to avoid 2 OR 1 =3 with AND as subtraction
    7) can never do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and are too ignorant in math to understand that analysis of something is not proving something in their "limit hornswaggle"
    8) too stupid in science to ask the question of physics-- is the 1897 Thomson discovery of a 0.5MeV particle actually the Dirac magnetic monopole and that the muon is the true electron of atoms stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law.
    Showing that Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow, Ed Witten, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Arthur B. McDonald are sapheads when it comes to logical thinking in physics with their do nothing proton, do nothing electron.



    Roger Penrose, Reinhard Genzel, Andrea Ghez,
    Peter Higgs, Rainer Weiss, Kip S. Thorne, Barry C. Barish
    David J. Thouless_, F. Duncan M. Haldane, John M. Kosterlitz, Takaaki Kajita
    Arthur B. McDonald
    Francois Englert
    Saul Perlmutter
    Brian P. Schmidt
    Adam G. Riess
    Makoto Kobayashi
    Toshihide Maskawa_
    Yoichiro Nambu_
    John C. Mather
    George F. Smoot
    Roy J. Glauber_
    David J. Gross
    Hugh David Politzer
    Frank Wilczek
    Raymond Davis Jr. _
    Masatoshi Koshiba_
    Riccardo Giacconi_
    Gerardus 't Hooft
    Martinus J.G. Veltman_
    Jerome I. Friedman
    Henry W. Kendall_
    Richard E. Taylor_
    Carlo Rubbia
    Simon van der Meer_
    William Alfred Fowler_
    Kenneth G. Wilson_
    James Watson Cronin_
    Val Logsdon Fitch_
    Sheldon Lee Glashow
    Steven Weinberg_
    .
    .
    little fishes
    .
    .
    Layers of error thinking physics Re: 2-Comparative Analysis of failures of Logic with failures of Physics// one thinks 3 OR 2 =5 with 3 AND 2 = subtraction of either 3 or 2, while the other thinks proton to electron is 938MeV vs .5MeV when truly it
    is 840MeV to 105MeV

    Physical Review Letters: Proton Mass
    Yi-Bo Yang, Jian Liang, Yu-Jiang Bi, Ying Chen, Terrence Draper, Keh-Fei Liu, Zhaofeng Liu
    more and more layers of error thinking physics
    .
    .
    Edward Witten
    John Baez
    Brian Greene
    Lisa Randall
    Alan H. Guth
    Michael E. Brown
    Konstantin Batygin
    Ben Bullock
    Larry Harson
    Mark Barton, PhD in Physics, The University of Queensland, physicist with National Astronomical Observatory of Japan
    Answered Aug 26, 2013 ยท Author has 8.7k answers and 10.3m answer views None at all - he was a raving nutter.
    Richard A. Muller, crank at Berkeley
    Jennifer Kahn, Discover, science hater
    Eric Francis Coppolino, newsreporter hatred of science, George Witte, St.Martin's Press science hater
    Toby Howard, The Guardian, science hater


    #2-1, 137th published book

    Introduction to AP's TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Physics textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
    by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)



    #1 New Release in Electromagnetic Theory

    This will be AP's 137th published book on science. And the number 137 is special to me for it is the number of QED, Quantum Electrodynamics as the inverse fine structure constant. I can always remember 137 as that special constant of physics and so I
    can remember where Teaching True Physics was started by me.

    Time has come for the world to have the authoritative textbooks for all of High School and College education. Written by the leading physics expert of the time. The last such was Feynman in the 1960s with Feynman Lectures on Physics. The time before
    was Maxwell in 1860s with his books and Encyclopedia Britannica editorship. The time is ripe in 2020 for the new authoritative texts on physics. It will be started in 2020 which is 60 years after Feynman. In the future, I request the physics community
    updates the premier physics textbook series at least every 30 years. For we can see that pattern of 30 years approximately from Faraday in 1830 to Maxwell in 1860 to Planck and Rutherford in about 1900, to Dirac in 1930 to Feynman in 1960 and finally to
    AP in 1990 and 2020. So much happens in physics after 30 years, that we need the revisions to take place in a timely manner. But also, as we move to Internet publishing such as Amazon's Kindle, we can see that updates can take place very fast, as editing
    can be a ongoing monthly or yearly activity. I for one keep constantly updating all my published books, at least I try to.

    Feynman was the best to make the last authoritative textbook series for his concentration was QED, Quantum Electrodynamics, the pinnacle peak of physics during the 20th century. Of course the Atom Totality theory took over after 1990 and all of
    physics; for all sciences are under the Atom Totality theory.
    And as QED was the pinnacle peak before 1990, the new pinnacle peak is the Atom Totality theory. The Atom Totality theory is the advancement of QED, for the Atom Totality theory primal axiom says -- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but Electricity
    and Magnetism.
    Length: 64 pages

    Product details
    โ€ข File Size : 790 KB
    โ€ข Publication Date : October 5, 2020
    โ€ข Word Wise : Enabled
    โ€ข Print Length : 64 pages
    โ€ข Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
    โ€ข Screen Reader : Supported
    โ€ข Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
    โ€ข X-Ray : Not Enabled
    โ€ข Language: : English
    โ€ข ASIN : B08KS4YGWY
    โ€ข Lending : Enabled
    โ€ข Best Sellers Rank: #430,602 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
    โ—ฆ #39 in Electromagnetic Theory
    โ—ฆ #73 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
    โ—ฆ #74 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads

    #2-2, 145th published book
    TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS//Junior High School// Physics textbook series, book 2
    Kindle Edition
    by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
    What I am doing is clearing the field of physics, clearing it of all the silly mistakes and errors and beliefs that clutter up physics. Clearing it of its fraud and fakeries and con-artistry. I thought of doing these textbooks starting with Senior
    year High School, wherein I myself started learning physics. But because of so much fraud and fakery in physics education, I believe we have to drop down to Junior year High School to make a drastic and dramatic emphasis on fakery and con-artistry that
    so much pervades science and physics in particular. So that we have two years in High School to learn physics. And discard the nonsense of physics brainwash that Old Physics filled the halls and corridors of education.

    Product details
    โ€ข ASIN : B08PC99JJB
    โ€ข Publication date : November 29, 2020
    โ€ข Language: : English
    โ€ข File size : 682 KB
    โ€ข Text-to-Speech : Enabled
    โ€ข Screen Reader : Supported
    โ€ข Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
    โ€ข X-Ray : Not Enabled
    โ€ข Word Wise : Enabled
    โ€ข Print length : 78 pages
    โ€ข Lending : Enabled
    โ€ข Best Sellers Rank: #185,995 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
    โ—ฆ #42 in Two-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
    โ—ฆ #344 in Physics (Kindle Store)
    โ—ฆ #2,160 in Physics (Books)

    #2-3, 146th published book

    TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Senior High School// Physics textbook series, book 3
    Kindle Edition
    by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

    I believe that in knowing the history of a science is knowing half of that science. And that if you are amiss of knowing the history behind a science, you have only a partial understanding of the concepts and ideas behind the science. I further
    believe it is easier to teach a science by teaching its history than any other means of teaching. So for senior year High School, I believe physics history is the best way of teaching physics. And in later years of physics courses, we can always pick up
    on details. So I devote this senior year High School physics to a history of physics, but only true physics. And there are few books written on the history of physics, so I chose Asimov's The History of Physics, 1966 as the template book for this
    textbook. Now Asimov's book is full of error and mistakes, and that is disappointing but all of Old Physics is full of error. On errors and mistakes of Old Physics, the best I can do is warn the students, and the largest warning of all is that whenever
    someone in Old Physics says "electron" what they are talking about is really the Dirac magnetic monopole. And whenever they talk about the Rutherford-Bohr model of the atom, they are talking about huge huge grave mistakes, for the true atom is protons as
    8 ringed toruses with a muon stuck inside of a proton doing the Faraday law and producing those magnetic monopoles as electricity. I use Asimov's book as a template but in the future, I hope to rewrite this textbook using no template at all, that is if I
    have time in the future.
    Cover Picture: Is the book The History of Physics, by Isaac Asimov, 1966 and on top of the book are 4 cut-outs of bent circles representing magnetic monopoles which revolutionizes modern physics, especially the ElectroMagnetic theory.

    Product details
    โ€ข ASIN โ€ : โ€Ž B08RK33T8V
    โ€ข Publication date โ€ : โ€Ž December 28, 2020
    โ€ข Language โ€ : โ€Ž English
    โ€ข File size โ€ : โ€Ž 794 KB
    โ€ข Text-to-Speech โ€ : โ€Ž Enabled
    โ€ข Screen Reader โ€ : โ€Ž Supported
    โ€ข Enhanced typesetting โ€ : โ€Ž Enabled
    โ€ข X-Ray โ€ : โ€Ž Not Enabled
    โ€ข Word Wise โ€ : โ€Ž Enabled
    โ€ข Print length โ€ : โ€Ž 123 pages
    โ€ข Lending โ€ : โ€Ž Enabled
    โ€ข Best Sellers Rank: #4,167,235 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
    โ—ฆ #15,099 in Physics (Kindle Store)
    โ—ฆ #91,163 in Physics (Books)


    #2-4, 151st published book

    TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// 1st year College// Physics textbook series, book 4 Kindle Edition
    by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

    Preface: This is AP's 151st book of science published. It is one of my most important books of science because 1st year college physics is so impressionable on students, if they should continue with physics, or look elsewhere for a career. And also,
    physics is a crossroad to all the other hard core sciences, where physics course is mandatory such as in chemistry or even biology. I have endeavored to make physics 1st year college to be as easy and simple to learn. In this endeavor to make physics
    super easy, I have made the writing such that you will see core ideas in all capital letters as single sentences as a educational tool. And I have made this textbook chapter writing follow a logical pattern of both algebra and geometry concepts,
    throughout. The utmost importance of logic in physics needs to be seen and understood. For I have never seen a physics book, prior to this one that is logical. Every Old Physics textbook I have seen is scatter-brained in topics and in writing. I use as
    template book of Halliday & Resnick because a edition of H&R was one I was taught physics at University of Cincinnati in 1969. And in 1969, I had a choice of majors, do I major in geology, or mathematics, or in physics, for I will graduate from UC in
    1972. For me, geology was too easy, but physics was too tough, so I ended up majoring in mathematics. If I had been taught in 1969 using this textbook that I have written, I would have ended up majoring in physics, my first love. For physics is not hard,
    not hard at all, once you clear out the mistakes and the obnoxious worthless mathematics that clutters up Old Physics, and the illogic that smothers much of Old Physics.

    Maybe it was good that I had those impressions of physics education of poor education, which still exists throughout physics today. Because maybe I am forced to write this book, because of that awful experience of learning physics in 1969. Without
    that awful experience, maybe this textbook would have never been written by me.

    Cover picture is the template book of Halliday & Resnick, 1988, 3rd edition Fundamentals of Physics and sitting on top are cut outs of "half bent circles, bent at 90 degrees" to imitate magnetic monopoles. Magnetic Monopoles revolutionizes physics
    education, and separates-out, what is Old Physics from what is New Physics.

    Product details
    โ€ข ASIN โ€ : โ€Ž B09JW5DVYM
    โ€ข Publication date โ€ : โ€Ž October 19, 2021
    โ€ข Language โ€ : โ€Ž English
    โ€ข File size โ€ : โ€Ž 1035 KB
    โ€ข Text-to-Speech โ€ : โ€Ž Enabled
    โ€ข Screen Reader โ€ : โ€Ž Supported
    โ€ข Enhanced typesetting โ€ : โ€Ž Enabled
    โ€ข X-Ray โ€ : โ€Ž Not Enabled
    โ€ข Word Wise โ€ : โ€Ž Enabled
    โ€ข Print length โ€ : โ€Ž 386 pages
    โ€ข Lending โ€ : โ€Ž Enabled
    โ€ข Best Sellers Rank: #4,874,333 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
    โ—ฆ #526 in Electromagnetic Theory
    โ—ฆ #1,321 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
    โ—ฆ #9,546 in Electromagnetism (Books)



    #2-5, 174th published book

    TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, 2nd year College
    by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Kindle Edition

    Preface: At the moment this is a physics book for 2nd year College. But as the months and years go by I intend to convert it into a textbook of about 200 to 300 pages. It is mostly about thermodynamics for in my own college education 1968-1972 at
    University of Cincinnati, I took physics thermodynamics in the 2nd year (if memory has not failed me).
    Cover-Picture: Is a iphone photograph of the Chemistry textbook I used at UC 1968-1972 with my own paper cut-outs of magnetic monopoles. Pictured are 4 bent circles, bent at 90degrees from diameter and each bent circle is a individual magnetic
    monopole.

    Product details
    โ€ข ASIN โ€ : โ€Ž B09TKL4HMC
    โ€ข Publication date โ€ : โ€Ž February 27, 2022
    โ€ข Language โ€ : โ€Ž English
    โ€ข File size โ€ : โ€Ž 675 KB
    โ€ข Text-to-Speech โ€ : โ€Ž Enabled
    โ€ข Screen Reader โ€ : โ€Ž Supported
    โ€ข Enhanced typesetting โ€ : โ€Ž Enabled
    โ€ข X-Ray โ€ : โ€Ž Not Enabled
    โ€ข Word Wise โ€ : โ€Ž Enabled
    โ€ข Print length โ€ : โ€Ž 41 pages
    โ€ข Lending โ€ : โ€Ž Enabled



    #2-6, 177th published book
    TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, Architecture of Atoms, 3rd year College
    by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Kindle Edition

    Preface: I come to teaching physics for 3rd year College as the Architecture of Atoms. My writing style will be prose-narrative, until I add on exercise problems and convert it into a textbook. The 1st year College, has to be the equations and laws
    of electricity and magnetism. For the primal-axiom over all of physics is-- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism. The 2nd year College is thermodynamics. And now the 3rd year College physics has to teach the Architecture, the
    geometry of the inside and exterior surface of the atom. One of the greatest faults, misery, and anti-science teaching of Old Physics is their denial that subatomic particles have to be something more than tiny balls tiny spheres that do-nothing, perform
    nothing, function as nothing. That the proton and neutron and true electron=muon, has to be matter with a function and purpose and design and task and job. This is a year of physics teaching of the architecture of the atom.
    Cover Picture: A iphone photograph of my book chemistry book, a long time favorite of mine of CHEM ONE, 2nd edition, Waser, Trueblood, Knobler, 1980, and page 307 of that book. Why this page? Because it was instrumental in my discovery of the true
    Architecture of Atoms. Not many professors of chemistry or physics dive into the Shrodinger Equation that results in a meaningful teaching of "matter waves". Matter waves are the heart of understanding the geometry of Atomic Architecture.

    Product details
    โ€ข ASIN โ€ : โ€Ž B09VFH9QST
    โ€ข Publication date โ€ : โ€Ž March 12, 2022
    โ€ข Language โ€ : โ€Ž English
    โ€ข File size โ€ : โ€Ž 823 KB
    โ€ข Text-to-Speech โ€ : โ€Ž Enabled
    โ€ข Screen Reader โ€ : โ€Ž Supported
    โ€ข Enhanced typesetting โ€ : โ€Ž Enabled
    โ€ข X-Ray โ€ : โ€Ž Not Enabled
    โ€ข Word Wise โ€ : โ€Ž Not Enabled
    โ€ข Print length โ€ : โ€Ž 74 pages
    โ€ข Lending โ€ : โ€Ž Enabled



    #2-7, 178th published book

    TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, Architecture of Light Waves & Energy, 4th year College
    by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Kindle edition)


    Preface: This is 4th year College Physics and the important ideas of physics to learn as last year undergraduate school is the architecture and geometry of the Light Wave & Energy in physics. This is New Physics and not Old Physics. New Physics is
    defined as physics that knows and uses the true electron of atoms is the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus and doing the Faraday law, creating new electrical energy that is storaged in the neutrons of atoms until they grow from 1eV into 945MeV and
    then create a new higher atomic numbered atom or emitted as radioactivity. Old Physics mistakenly identified the electron of atoms as the 0.5MeV particle that AP calls the Dirac magnetic monopole. In 3rd year College we studied the architecture of the
    interior of atoms. In 4th year College we study the architecture of Light Waves & Energy.

    The template book for 4th year College is Feynman's 1985 book of QED.

    Cover Picture: Is my iphone photograph of the template book for this book. Feynman's 1985 QED, quantum electrodynamics, showing my plastic toy model of DNA and my cut-outs of 4 bent circles that each bent circle represents one magnetic monopole. I
    arranged the monopoles into a single strand of a cycloid wave.

    Product details
    โ€ข ASIN โ€ : โ€Ž B09W58XGDW
    โ€ข Publication date โ€ : โ€Ž March 21, 2022
    โ€ข Language โ€ : โ€Ž English
    โ€ข File size โ€ : โ€Ž 824 KB
    โ€ข Text-to-Speech โ€ : โ€Ž Enabled
    โ€ข Screen Reader โ€ : โ€Ž Supported
    โ€ข Enhanced typesetting โ€ : โ€Ž Enabled
    โ€ข X-Ray โ€ : โ€Ž Not Enabled
    โ€ข Word Wise โ€ : โ€Ž Enabled
    โ€ข Print length โ€ : โ€Ž 66 pages
    โ€ข Lending โ€ : โ€Ž Enabled




    On Sunday, September 11, 2022 at 12:07:15 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
    I want to fuck her corpse
    On Monday, September 19, 2022 at 3:21:37 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
    fails at math and science:


    Kibo Parry M the 30 year stalker joined by his friends Chris Thomasson and Dan Christensen
    Why Kibo, because Ruth Charney, Jill Pipher, Harvard's Dr.Hau cannot admit slant cut of cone is Oval, never ellipse???



    Kibo Parry M on CIA Kate Heinzelman,Harvard's Dr. Hau.
    Kibo on > I want to fuck her corpse
    On Sunday, September 11, 2022 at 12:07:15 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
    I want to fuck her corpse
    Why Kibo??? Because she refuses to finish her experiment and see all the light vanishes simultaneously, or is it because she can not admit slant cut of cone is Oval, never ellipse???

    On Wednesday, November 2, 2022 at 12:21:30 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote: >"Imp of Math"
    On Monday, January 18, 2021 at 2:06:24 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
    fails at math and science:

    Re: Drs.Larry Summers, Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall of Harvard, teach percentages correctly??-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole (1)
    By Michael Moroney 1/23/18, 44 posts 461 views


    Kibo on Kate Heinzelman
    On Sunday, September 11, 2022 at 12:07:15 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
    I want to fuck her corpse
    Kibo Parry Moroney in 1997 blows his CIA cover-- to the entire world, mind you---
    Re: Archimedes Vanadium, America's most beloved poster
    In article <5nefan$i06$9...@news.thecia.net> kibo greps <ki...@shell.thecia.net> writes:


    On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 at 9:13:14 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote: >"Court Jester of Math"

    Kibo,is Ruth Charney of AMS the model in your book, for she cannot admit the slant cut of cone is Oval, never the ellipse as proven by AP in 2016? I know it falls on deaf ears of Kibo with his 938 is 12% short of 945. And Ruth, would the AMS publish Kibo'
    s 938 is 12% short of 945, because the AMS certainly will not publish AP's conic proof? Maybe that is all the AMS publishes-- fake math.

    Kibo on wanting to fuck her corpse/Kate Heinzelman, question, do you not think CIA is going overboard on stalking-- I mean 30 years for the insane Kibo Parry M??

    On Sunday, September 11, 2022 at 12:07:15 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
    I want to fuck her corpse
    On Monday, September 19, 2022 at 3:21:37 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
    fails at math and science:

    Kibo's "I want to fuck her corpse" rubbing off on Canada's Dan Christensen with his 20 year stalking of Univ Toronto's Rose M. Patten, Univ Western Ontario's Linda Hasenfratz, when Dan is a failure of math and logic with his 2 OR 1=3, and his ellipse

    Kibo Parry M the 30 year stalker joined by his friends Chris Thomasson and Dan Christensen
    Why Kibo, because Ruth Charney, Jill Pipher, Harvard's Dr.Hau cannot admit slant cut of cone is Oval, never ellipse???

    On Thursday, January 26, 2023 at 10:55:02 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote: >"certifiably insane"
    fails at math and science:
    "I want to fuck her corpse"
    "I want to fuck her corpse"
    Not again!
    I want to fuck her corpse

    You sicko! Why do you keep saying that?

    wanting to fuck her corpse

    I want to fuck her corpse

    I want to fuck her corpse


    Re: Kibo on > I want to fuck her corpse > AMS Jill Pipher, Ruth Charney, Harvard's Dr.Lisa Randall, Dr.Hau,CIA Kate Heinzelman, MIT's Anette Hosoi,Cynthia Barnhart
    by Augวl Jan 1, 2023, 7:41:27 AM

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Volney@21:1/5 to All on Sun Apr 30 01:09:52 2023
    ๐ŸŒช๏ธ of Math and ๐ŸŒ€ of Physics Archimedes "certifiably insane" Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> tarded:

    I want to fuck her corpse

    Oh no! I was hoping Plutonium was finally over his necrophilia!

    "I want to fuck her corpse"

    Not again!

    I want to fuck her corpse

    Plutonium's obsession takes over!

    "I want to fuck her corpse"

    You sicko! Why do you keep saying that?

    wanting to fuck her corpse

    I want to fuck her corpse

    Lock up all the morgues and funeral homes! Plutonium has gotten horny again!

    I want to fuck her corpse

    We need to lock up the viagra as well! Imagine the combination of
    Plutonium, Viagra and a morgue? Horrifying!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Volney@21:1/5 to All on Fri May 5 22:41:42 2023
    ๐Ÿ‘ฝ of Math and ๐Ÿ›ธ of Physics Archimedes "science hater" Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> tarded:

    238th book of science for AP // Proving the Principle of Maximum Electricity Production is done by Atoms

    The letters in "Archimedes Plutonium" can be re-arranged to spell
    "Old-Time U.S. Urine Champ".

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Volney@21:1/5 to All on Sun Aug 6 14:09:45 2023
    ๐Ÿธ of Math and ๐Ÿข of Physics Archimedes "Meckling Village Idiot"
    Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails at math and science:

    On Tuesday, August 1, 2023 at 3:06:56โ€ฏAM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
    Thanks to Apple Inc, my music is up and running again. And I need to drop into the Church of music every now and then. I am about to write my 252nd book of science, so I have much to rejoice and praise of God Almighty.
    As great as thou art

    Why would anyone make songs of praise to the evil Plutonium demon god?
    Do you sing songs of praise to Beelzebub as well?

    Of course making hymns to demons is the exact opposite of science.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Archimedes Plutonium@21:1/5 to Volney on Sun Aug 6 12:28:39 2023
    NSF Dr. Panchanathan,Purdue's Cordova, Lloyd Whitman, John J. Veysey, Scott Stanley, why does Kibo continue to defile the Pope, for he continues to defile and demonize AP everyday?

    Re: Univ Dayton Eric Spina, why Kibo hate The Pope? He continues to defile The Pope? Can you stop him, for he has defiled and demonized AP for 30 years nonstop, are you going to let him defile the Pope for 30 years???? And Todd B.Smith, how is your

    Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
    by Volney Feb 24, 2023, 11:28:40โ€ฏPM


    On Tuesday, February 28, 2023 at 9:28:07โ€ฏPM UTC-6, Volney wrote:
    Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
    "self diagnosed as insane"

    Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
    by Volney Mar 31, 2023, 1:45:31โ€ฏAM


    Univ Dayton Eric Spina, why Kibo hate The Pope? He continues to defile The Pope? Can you stop him, for he has defiled and demonized AP for 30 years nonstop, are you going to let him defile the Pope for 30 years???? And Todd B.Smith, how is your reading
    of AP's TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS and TEACHING TRUE MATH textbook series (see below) coming along. I would answer any questions you may have, provided they are serious questions.

    Kibo Parry Moroney-Volney, an open hate channel--

    Paid 30 yr. stalker Kibo Parry (Volney)
    On Thursday, June 1, 2023 at 1:06:17โ€ฏPM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
    Gnat of Math and Phlea of Physics
    "Kim Jong Un's lackey"
    "psychoceramic"
    Drag Queen of Science especially Physics and Logic

    Is NSF Dr. Panchanathan paying Kibo to stalk??? If so, please replace him.

    Pres.Biden please examine the resignation of Dr.Panchanathan NSF (Trump appointee) as the root cause of Kibo's "analbuttfuckmanure" stalk 2017, Kibo's necrophilia stalking 2022, Kibo's hatred of Pope, and Kibo's "you need more punishment" stalks.

    NSF Dr.Panchanathan resign and get someone in there who knows science who knows Maxwell Equations, not chutes & ladders and Pokemon games. Get a leader at NSF who has brains enough to know it is --- bad bad business--- to pay stalkers to stalk Usenet--
    Panchanathan is worse at NSF than Trump is at presidency, and Panchanathan was a Trump appointment.

    Why does the NSF hate the Pope??? You should all be all ashamed of yourself at the NSF and write the Pope a letter of apology for the James Kibo Parry Moroney Volney constant hate spew on the Pope.
    ๎—“

    ---quoting Wikipedia ---
    Controversy
    Many government and university installations blocked, threatened to block, or attempted to shut-down The World's Internet connection until Software Tool & Die was eventually granted permission by the National Science Foundation to provide public Internet
    access on "an experimental basis."
    --- end quote ---

    NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

    Dr. Panchanathan , present day
    NSF Dr. Panchanathan, F. Fleming Crim, Dorothy E Aronson, Brian Stone, James S Olvestad, Rebecca Lynn Keiser, Vernon D. Ross, Lloyd Whitman, John J. Veysey, Scott Stanley
    France Anne Cordova
    Subra Suresh
    Arden Lee Bement Jr.
    Rita R. Colwell
    Neal Francis Lane
    John Howard Gibbons 1993

    Barry Shein, kibo parry std world
    Jim Frost, Joe "Spike" Ilacqua
    ๎—“





    On Wednesday, May 31, 2023 at 1:16:12โ€ฏAM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
    Hagfish of Math and Slime Eel of Physics
    Re: "howling crazy fuckdog"
    "Putin's minion"
    defiles the Pope before tarding:
    Eric Spina,Elizabeth Smith,Todd B. Smith Univ Dayton--
    Dayton? Are you trying to guess universities one by one to find mine?


    On Tuesday, May 30, 2023 at 4:51:55โ€ฏPM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
    "imp of physics"
    defiles the pope and then tards:
    Turd Soup Machine".

    But the defiling of the character AP b
  • From Volney@21:1/5 to All on Sat Sep 16 19:52:22 2023
    ๐Ÿธ of Math and ๐Ÿข of Physics Archimedes "Meckling Village Idiot"
    Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails at math and science:

    My 134th published book

    Introduction to TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 1 for ages 5 through 26, math textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
    by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

    Why do you keep trying to brainwash poor little 5 year old kids?



    WARNING TO STUDENTS, PARENTS and TEACHERS: Archimedes Plutonium is
    offering to teach your children his broken physics and math. BEWARE! He
    will corrupt the minds of your children! Mr. Plutonium is not content to
    be a failure of math and physics all by himself. He wants everyone else
    to fail as well! He teaches bizarre false physics and math, such as
    atoms contain the unstable muon, water is H4O and not H2O, the ellipse
    isn't a conic section, there are no negative numbers and no complex
    numbers, that a sine wave isn't sinusoidal but semicircles, cycloids or parabolas (depending on his mood), plus many, many other instances of
    bad math and physics.

    Plutonium has previously tried to corrupt our youth by posting his books
    on Usenet. That has failed until now, perhaps in part due to the fact
    Usenet is an old, dying medium, which few modern students even know of,
    much less use. However, Mr. Plutonium has somehow duped Amazon into
    providing his dangerous books for free on Kindle. This has greatly
    increased the danger to our students!

    One of his dangerous tricks is teach false Boolean logic such as 10 AND
    2 = 12. His method at doing this is particularly insidious. He'll post a
    false statement that nobody believes, such as 10 OR 2 = 12, say that it
    is false (which it is), but then he'll try to replace it with another
    similar false statement such as 10 AND 2 = 12, in order to really
    confuse future computer scientists. Plutonium is taking advantage of the
    fact that AND means different things in Boolean logic and elementary arithmetic, as AND is an informal synonym for plus/addition. It is
    important for future computer scientists to remember that in the bitwise Boolean logic used by modern computers, 10 OR 2 = 10 and 10 AND 2 = 2.
    Of course in pure Boolean logic the only possible values are true and
    false (1 or 0), so in pure Boolean logic the statements "10 AND 2" and
    "10 OR 2" don't even make sense. Don't let evil Plutonium's bad logic
    confuse you!

    Plutonium has been targeting children as young as 5. A new attempt to
    corrupt the minds of young children is to teach that the alphabet has 12 letters, 6 vowels and 6 consonants. This sounds like a great way to
    keep our children from reading!

    Nobody knows why Plutonium wishes to corrupt the minds of our youth like
    this. Perhaps Plutonium is envious of their potential success, which he
    never had because he is a failure at math and science. Plutonium is not
    content to be a failure at math and physics all by himself. He wants
    everyone to fail as well. Some claim Plutonium is an agent of China, in
    order for China to dominate the world economy. Maybe he is a minion of
    Kim Jong Un of North Korea. Most likely, however, he is an agent of
    Putin and Russia, since Plutonium has previously attempted to summon
    Russian robots in 2017 "to create a new, true mathematics" in an attempt
    to destroy mathematics.

    Additionally, Plutonium has started a Cult of Failure. He is trying to
    convince students to worship his evil pagan Plutonium atom god of
    Failure. This cult is anti-science and anti-mathematics. Its only goal
    is to promote failure in math and science.

    There is some evidence this Cult of Failure may be a suicide cult.
    Plutonium has advocated that the "good guy" nations join into a
    supernation and threaten to "flatten" the (nuclear armed) "bad guy"
    nations who misbehave. The idea may to initiate an all-out nuclear
    war when "bad guy" nations retaliate. Not simply is Plutonium or his
    cult committing suicide but would take Planet Earth with them. As the
    war in Ukraine continues, Plutonium keeps asking NATO to attack the
    Russians, starting a nuclear WW3, which he feels is unavoidable. More
    evidence of Plutonium's Cult of Failure being a suicide cult.

    Plutonium is now encouraging resistance fighters fighting the regimes
    in Russia and Iran to attack power lines in Tehran and Moscow by
    carrying long vertical aluminum poles under them, presumably to short
    them out, complete with a diagram. Obviously, this will not end well
    for for the resistance fighter. The question is, did he do this because
    he is Putin's stooge trying to kill off resistance fighters? Or is this
    part of Plutonium's Suicide Cult of Failure, meaning this is merely a suggestion how to commit suicide while failing to harm the regimes? Or
    both?

    But the point is, stay away, if he offers to give or sell you one of his dangerous books. Especially now since they are available for free from otherwise legitimate Amazon.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Volney@21:1/5 to All on Sun Sep 17 15:35:02 2023
    โ˜ ๏ธ of Math and ๐Ÿ•ฑ of Physics Archimedes "antiscience" Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails at math and science:



    But the spamming insane never realize their sins until someone makes fun of their evil ways.
    So amusing that Plutonium writes this as Pluto never realizes he's one
    of the biggest of the spamming insane, which is why I make fun of
    Plutonium's evil ways. And having fun doing so.

    My 134th published book

    Introduction to TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 1 for ages 5 through 26, math textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
    by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

    Why do you keep trying to brainwash poor little 5 year old kids?



    WARNING TO STUDENTS, PARENTS and TEACHERS: Archimedes Plutonium is
    offering to teach your children his broken physics and math. BEWARE! He
    will corrupt the minds of your children! Mr. Plutonium is not content to
    be a failure of math and physics all by himself. He wants everyone else
    to fail as well! He teaches bizarre false physics and math, such as
    atoms contain the unstable muon, water is H4O and not H2O, the ellipse
    isn't a conic section, there are no negative numbers and no complex
    numbers, that a sine wave isn't sinusoidal but semicircles, cycloids or parabolas (depending on his mood), plus many, many other instances of
    bad math and physics.

    Plutonium has previously tried to corrupt our youth by posting his books
    on Usenet. That has failed until now, perhaps in part due to the fact
    Usenet is an old, dying medium, which few modern students even know of,
    much less use. However, Mr. Plutonium has somehow duped Amazon into
    providing his dangerous books for free on Kindle. This has greatly
    increased the danger to our students!

    One of his dangerous tricks is teach false Boolean logic such as 10 AND
    2 = 12. His method at doing this is particularly insidious. He'll post a
    false statement that nobody believes, such as 10 OR 2 = 12, say that it
    is false (which it is), but then he'll try to replace it with another
    similar false statement such as 10 AND 2 = 12, in order to really
    confuse future computer scientists. Plutonium is taking advantage of the
    fact that AND means different things in Boolean logic and elementary arithmetic, as AND is an informal synonym for plus/addition. It is
    important for future computer scientists to remember that in the bitwise Boolean logic used by modern computers, 10 OR 2 = 10 and 10 AND 2 = 2.
    Of course in pure Boolean logic the only possible values are true and
    false (1 or 0), so in pure Boolean logic the statements "10 AND 2" and
    "10 OR 2" don't even make sense. Don't let evil Plutonium's bad logic
    confuse you!

    Plutonium has been targeting children as young as 5. A new attempt to
    corrupt the minds of young children is to teach that the alphabet has 12 letters, 6 vowels and 6 consonants. This sounds like a great way to
    keep our children from reading!

    Nobody knows why Plutonium wishes to corrupt the minds of our youth like
    this. Perhaps Plutonium is envious of their potential success, which he
    never had because he is a failure at math and science. Plutonium is not
    content to be a failure at math and physics all by himself. He wants
    everyone to fail as well. Some claim Plutonium is an agent of China, in
    order for China to dominate the world economy. Maybe he is a minion of
    Kim Jong Un of North Korea. Most likely, however, he is an agent of
    Putin and Russia, since Plutonium has previously attempted to summon
    Russian robots in 2017 "to create a new, true mathematics" in an attempt
    to destroy mathematics.

    Additionally, Plutonium has started a Cult of Failure. He is trying to
    convince students to worship his evil pagan Plutonium atom god of
    Failure. This cult is anti-science and anti-mathematics. Its only goal
    is to promote failure in math and science.

    There is some evidence this Cult of Failure may be a suicide cult.
    Plutonium has advocated that the "good guy" nations join into a
    supernation and threaten to "flatten" the (nuclear armed) "bad guy"
    nations who misbehave. The idea may to initiate an all-out nuclear
    war when "bad guy" nations retaliate. Not simply is Plutonium or his
    cult committing suicide but would take Planet Earth with them. As the
    war in Ukraine continues, Plutonium keeps asking NATO to attack the
    Russians, starting a nuclear WW3, which he feels is unavoidable. More
    evidence of Plutonium's Cult of Failure being a suicide cult.

    Plutonium is now encouraging resistance fighters fighting the regimes
    in Russia and Iran to attack power lines in Tehran and Moscow by
    carrying long vertical aluminum poles under them, presumably to short
    them out, complete with a diagram. Obviously, this will not end well
    for for the resistance fighter. The question is, did he do this because
    he is Putin's stooge trying to kill off resistance fighters? Or is this
    part of Plutonium's Suicide Cult of Failure, meaning this is merely a suggestion how to commit suicide while failing to harm the regimes? Or
    both?

    But the point is, stay away, if he offers to give or sell you one of his dangerous books. Especially now since they are available for free from otherwise legitimate Amazon.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Archimedes Plutonium@21:1/5 to Volney on Tue Sep 19 14:48:01 2023
    Kibo Volney picture defiling The Pope> ๐Ÿธ of Math and ๐Ÿข of Physics
    On Sunday, August 6, 2023 at 1:09:50โ€ฏPM UTC-5, Volney wrote: Kibo Volney has been hate spew stalker for 30 years now

    Is The Pope using TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS in all Catholic schools for it certainly is the easiest Calculus in all the world to learn, even High School Students can master the calculus.

    TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS, AP seeks the super easiest calculus possible on Earth-- polynomials as the only valid functions-- thus, and therefore, making derivative and integral as easy as Power Rule- 14 year olds master calculus

    Old Math makes and keeps Calculus as classroom torture chambers with their 1,000s of different functions yet the polynomial is the only valid function of math, and makes it super super easy to learn calculus

    TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS, AP seeks the super easiest calculus possible on Earth-- polynomials as the only valid functions-- thus, and therefore, making derivative and integral as easy as Power Rule- 14 year olds master calculus.

    If you come to me with a pathetic non polynomial, I have you go home and convert your nonsense to a polynomial. The Lagrange interpolation converts stupid nonfunctions like trig, into valid functions of polynomials.

    the 30 year nonstop stalker Kibo Parry Moroney-Volney
    On Friday, September 15, 2023 at 5:37:32โ€ฏPM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
    "goonclod failure of logic"

    TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS textbooks, makes calculus as easy as adding or subtracting 1 from exponent--only valid functions are polynomials contrast with mainstream--vomiting during exams, torture chamber and nervous breakdown by sado-masochist teachers.
    Old Math is thousands of different kook functions with thousands of different rules. AP Calculus is one function-- the polynomial for we care about truth in math, not on whether kooks of math become rich and famous off the suffering-backs of students put
    through a torture chamber that is present day calculus. If you come to math with a function that is not a polynomial, you have to convert it to a polynomial. Once converted, calculus is super super easy. But math professors seem to enjoy torturing
    students, not teaching them. Psychology teaches us that when a kook goes through a torture chamber and comes out of it as a math professor-- they want to be vindictive and sado masochists and love to torture others and put them through the same torture
    chamber that they went through. AP says-- stop this cycle of torture and teach TRUE CORRECT MATH.



    TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS, AP seeks the super easiest calculus possible on Earth-- polynomials as the only valid functions-- thus, and therefore, making derivative and integral as easy as Power Rule- 14 year olds master calculus

    TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS textbooks, makes calculus as easy as adding or subtracting 1 from exponent--only valid functions are polynomials contrast with mainstream--vomiting during exams, torture chamber and nervous breakdown by sado-masochist teachers.
    Old Math is thousands of different kook functions with thousands of different rules. AP Calculus is one function-- the polynomial for we care about truth in math, not on whether kooks of math become rich and famous off the suffering of students put
    through a torture chamber that is present day calculus. If you come to math with a function that is not a polynomial, you have to convert it to a polynomial. Once converted, calculus is super super easy. But math professors seem to enjoy torturing
    students, not teaching them.

    Old Math calculus textbooks like Stewart are more than 1,000 pages long and they need that because they have a mindless thousand different functions and no valid proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. AP's calculus is less than 300 pages, because we
    have a valid geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus which demands the only valid function of math be a polynomial function. We can teach calculus in Junior High School for the calculus is reduced to adding or subtracting 1 from the exponent.
    The only hard part of calculus in New Math is to convert the boneheaded function into a polynomial that was brought to the table by the boneheaded math professor who thinks that a function does not need to be a polynomial.

    AP calculus transforms the calculus classroom. It is no longer vomiting during exams. No longer a torture chamber for our students of youth, and no longer a nightmare nor nervous breakdown for our youthful students, who, all they ever wanted was the
    truth of mathematics.

    Teaches that derivative predicts next point of function graph--silly Old Math has derivative as tangent to function graph unable to predict. The great power of Calculus is integral is area under function graph thus physics energy, and its prediction
    power of the derivative to predict the next future point of function graph thus making the derivative a "law of physics as predictor". Stupid Old Math makes the derivative a tangent line, while New Math makes the derivative the predictor of next point of
    function graph. No wonder no-one in Old Math could do a geometry, let alone a valid proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, for no-one in Old Math even had the mind to realize Calculus predicts the future point in the derivative.

    AP has managed to make sci.math a battlefield where AP is alone on one side and every other poster is either a direct attack on AP or an indirect attack on AP such as Markus, Gabriel, Thomasson, WM trying to push AP off the front page. While over in sci.
    physics, the maintenance team at sci.physics still have control of the helm. But sci.math is without a helmsman and rudderless. Quite a spectacle, and time for a change of personnel ISP of sci.math to be at least like sci.physics. I do not know how much
    of this if any, is the fault of NSF Dr.Panchanathan, Kibo Parry Moron-ey-Volney, Tim Skirvin, Gilbert Strang...

    TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS-- only math textbooks with a valid proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus--teaches that derivative predicts next point of function graph--silly Old Math has derivative as tangent to function graph unable to predict. This is
    why calculus is so important for physics, like a law of physics-- predicts the future given nearby point, predicts the next point. And of course the integral tells us the energy. Silly stupid Old Math understood the integral as area under the function
    graph curve, but were stupid silly as to the understanding of derivative-- predict the next point as seen in this illustration:


    From this rectangle of the integral with points A, midpoint then B


    ______
    | |
    | |
    | |
    ---------


    To this trapezoid with points A, m, B

    B
    /|
    / |
    m /----|
    / |
    | |
    |____|


    The trapezoid roof has to be a straight-line segment (the derivative)
    so that it can be hinged at m, and swiveled down to form rectangle for integral.

    Or going in reverse. From rectangle, the right triangle predicts the next successor point of function graph curve of B, from that of midpoint m and initial point of function graph A.


    My 134th published book

    Introduction to TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 1 for ages 5 through 26, math textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
    by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

    The 134th book of AP, and belatedly late, for I had already written the series of TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS in a 7 volume, 8 book set. This would be the first book in that 8 book set (one of the books is a companion book to 1st year college). But I
    suppose that I needed to write the full series before I could write the Introduction and know what I had to talk about and talk about in a logical progression order. Sounds paradoxical in a sense, that I needed to write the full series first and then go
    back and write the Introduction. But in another sense, hard to write an introduction on something you have not really fully done and completed. For example to know what is error filled Old Math and to list those errors in a logical order requires me to
    write the full 7 volumes in order to list in order the mistakes.

    Cover Picture: Mathematics begins with counting, with numbers, with quantity. But counting numbers needs geometry for something to count in the first place. So here in this picture of the generalized Hydrogen atom of chemistry and physics is a torus
    geometry of 8 rings of a proton torus and one ring where my fingers are, is a equator ring that is the muon and thrusting through the proton torus at the equator of the torus. So we count 9 rings in all. So math is created by atoms and math numbers exist
    because atoms have many geometry figures to count. And geometry exists because atoms have shapes and different figures.

    Product details
    โ€ข ASIN โ€ : โ€Ž B08K2XQB4M
    โ€ข Publication date โ€ : โ€Ž September 24, 2020
    โ€ข Language โ€ : โ€Ž English
    โ€ข File size โ€ : โ€Ž 576 KB
    โ€ข Text-to-Speech โ€ : โ€Ž Enabled
    โ€ข Screen Reader โ€ : โ€Ž Supported
    โ€ข Enhanced typesetting โ€ : โ€Ž Enabled
    โ€ข X-Ray โ€ : โ€Ž Not Enabled
    โ€ข Word Wise โ€ : โ€Ž Not Enabled
    โ€ข Print length โ€ : โ€Ž 23 pages
    โ€ข Lending โ€ : โ€Ž Enabled
    โ€ข Best Sellers Rank: #224,974 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store) โ—ฆ #3 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
    โ—ฆ #23 in Calculus (Kindle Store)
    โ—ฆ #182 in Calculus (Books)



    #5-2, My 45th published book.

    TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 2 for ages 5 to 18, math textbook series, book 2
    by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon Kindle edition)

    Last revision was 2NOV2020. And this is AP's 45th published book of science.

    Preface: Volume 2 takes the 5 year old student through to senior in High School for their math education.

    This is a textbook series in several volumes that carries every person through all his/her math education starting age 5 up to age 26. Volume 2 is for age 5 year old to that of senior in High School, that is needed to do both science and math. Every
    other math book is incidental to this series of Teaching True Mathematics.

    It is a journal-textbook because Amazon's Kindle offers me the ability to edit overnight, and to change the text, almost on a daily basis. A unique first in education textbooks-- almost a continual overnight editing. Adding new text, correcting text.
    Volume 2 takes the 5 year old student through to senior in High School for their math education. Volume 3 carries the Freshperson in College for their math calculus education.

    Cover Picture: The Numbers as Integers from 0 to 100, and 10 Grid when dividing by 10, and part of the 100 Grid when dividing by 100. Decimal Grid Numbers are the true numbers of mathematics. The Reals, the rationals & irrationals, the algebraic &
    transcendentals, the imaginary & Complex, and the negative-numbers are all fake numbers. For, to be a true number, you have to "be counted" by mathematical induction. The smallest Grid system is the Decimal 10 Grid.



    Product details
    ASIN โ€ : โ€Ž B07RG7BVZW
    Publication date โ€ : โ€Ž May 2, 2019
    Language โ€ : โ€Ž English
    File size โ€ : โ€Ž 2024 KB
    Text-to-Speech โ€ : โ€Ž Enabled
    Screen Reader โ€ : โ€Ž Supported
    Enhanced typesetting โ€ : โ€Ž Enabled
    X-Ray โ€ : โ€Ž Not Enabled
    Word Wise โ€ : โ€Ž Not Enabled
    Print length โ€ : โ€Ž 423 pages
    Lending โ€ : โ€Ž Enabled
    Best Sellers Rank: #235,426 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
    #15 in General Geometry
    #223 in Geometry & Topology (Books)


    #5-3, 55th published book

    TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 3 for age 18-19, 1st year College Calculus, math textbook series, book 3 Kindle Edition
    by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

    Last revision was 25Jun2021. And this is AP's 55th published book of science.

    Teaching True Mathematics, by Archimedes Plutonium 2019

    Preface: This is volume 3, book 3 of Teaching True Mathematics, designed for College Freshperson students, 1st year college students of age 18-19. It is the continuation of volume 2 for ages 5 through 18 years old.

    The main major topic is the AP-EM equations of electricity and magnetism, the mathematics for the laws of electricity and magnetism; what used to be called the Maxwell Equations of Physics. The 1st Year College Math has to prepare all students with the
    math for all the sciences. So 1st year college Math is like a huge intersection station that has to prepare students with the math they need to do the hard sciences such as physics, chemistry, biology, astronomy, geology, etc. What this means is, 1st
    year college is calculus that allows the student to work with electricity and magnetism. All the math that is needed to enable students to do electricity and magnetism. In Old Math before this textbook, those Old Math textbooks would end in 1/3 of the
    text about Arclength, vector space, div, curl, Line Integral, Green's, Stokes, Divergence theorem trying to reach and be able to teach Maxwell Equations. But sadly, barely any Old Math classroom reached that 1/3 ending of the textbook, and left all those
    college students without any math to tackle electricity and magnetism. And most of Old Math was just muddle headed wrong even if they covered the last 1/3 of the textbook. And that is totally unacceptable in science. This textbook fixes that huge hole
    and gap in Old Math education.

    And there is no way around it, that a course in 1st year College Calculus is going to do a lot of hands on experiment with electricity and magnetism, and is required of the students to buy a list of physics apparatus-- multimeter, galvanometer, coil, bar
    magnet, alligator clip wires, electromagnet, iron filing case, and possibly even a 12 volt transformer, all shown in the cover picture. The beginning of this textbook and the middle section all leads into the ending of this textbook-- we learn the AP-EM
    Equations and how to use those equations. And there is no escaping the fact that it has to be hands on physics experiments in the classroom of mathematics.

    But, do not be scared, for this is all easy easy easy. For if you passed and enjoyed Volume 2 TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS, then I promise you, you will not be stressed with Volume 3, for I go out of my way to make it clear and understandable.

    Warning: this is a Journal Textbook, meaning that I am constantly adding new material, constantly revising, constantly fixing mistakes or making things more clear. So if you read this book in August of 2019, chances are it is different when you read it
    in September 2019. Ebooks allow authors the freedom to improve their textbooks on a ongoing basis.

    The 1st year college math should be about the math that prepares any and all students for science, whether they branch out into physics, chemistry, biology, geology, astronomy, or math, they should have all the math in 1st year college that will carry
    them through those science studies. I make every attempt possible to make math easy to understand, easy to learn and hopefully fun.

    Product details
    โ€ข ASIN โ€ : โ€Ž B07WN9RVXD
    โ€ข Publication date โ€ : โ€Ž August 16, 2019
    โ€ข Language โ€ : โ€Ž English
    โ€ข File size โ€ : โ€Ž 1390 KB
    โ€ข Simultaneous device usage โ€ : โ€Ž Unlimited
    โ€ข Text-to-Speech โ€ : โ€Ž Enabled
    โ€ข Screen Reader โ€ : โ€Ž Supported
    โ€ข Enhanced typesetting โ€ : โ€Ž Enabled
    โ€ข X-Ray โ€ : โ€Ž Not Enabled
    โ€ข Word Wise โ€ : โ€Ž Not Enabled
    โ€ข Print length โ€ : โ€Ž 236 pages
    โ€ข Lending โ€ : โ€Ž Enabled
    โ€ข Best Sellers Rank: #1,377,070 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
    โ—ฆ #411 in Calculus (Kindle Store)
    โ—ฆ #2,480 in Calculus (Books)



    #5-4, 56th published book

    COLLEGE CALCULUS GUIDE to help students recognize math professor spam from math truth & reality// math textbook series, book 4 Kindle Edition

    by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)


    #1 New Releasein 15-Minute Science & Math Short Reads


    This textbook is the companion guide book to AP's Teaching True Mathematics, 1st year College. It is realized that Old Math will take a long time in removing their fake math, so in the interim period, this Guide book is designed to speed up the process
    of removing fake Calculus out of the education system, the fewer students we punish with forcing them with fake Calculus, the better we are.
    Cover Picture: This book is part comedy, for when you cannot reason with math professors that they have many errors to fix, that 90% of their Calculus is in error, you end up resorting to comedy, making fun of them, to prod them to fix their errors. To
    prod them to "do right by the students of the world" not their entrenched propaganda.
    Length: 54 pages


    Product details
    File Size: 1035 KB
    Print Length: 64 pages
    Simultaneous Device Usage: Unlimited
    Publication Date: August 18, 2019
    Sold by: Amazon.com Services LLC
    Language: English
    ASIN: B07WNGLQ85
    Text-to-Speech: Enabled
    X-Ray: โ€จNot Enabled โ€จ
    Word Wise: Not Enabled
    Lending: Enabled
    Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled
    Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #253,425 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
    #38 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
    #318 in Calculus (Books)
    #48 in Calculus (Kindle Store)
    โ€จ
    #5-5, 72nd published book

    TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 4 for age 19-20 Sophomore-year College, math textbook series, book 5 Kindle Edition
    by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

    Preface: This is volume 4, book 5 of Teaching True Mathematics, designed for College Sophomore-year students, students of age 19-20. It is the continuation of volume 3 in the end-goal of learning how to do the mathematics of electricity and magnetism,
    because everything in physics is nothing but atoms and atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism. To know math, you have to know physics. We learned the Calculus of 2nd dimension and applied it to the equations of physics for electricity and
    magnetism. But we did not learn the calculus of those equations for 3rd dimension. So, you can say that Sophomore year College math is devoted to 3D Calculus. This sophomore year college we fill in all the calculus, and we start over on all of Geometry,
    for geometry needs a modern day revision. And pardon me for this book is mostly reading, and the students doing less calculations. The classroom of this textbook has the teacher go through page by page to get the students comprehending and understanding
    of what is being taught. There are many hands on experiments also.

    Cover Picture shows some toruses, some round some square, torus of rings, thin strips of rings or squares and shows them laid flat. That is Calculus of 3rd dimension that lays a ring in a torus to be flat in 2nd dimension.
    Length: 105 pages

    Product details
    โ€ข ASIN โ€ : โ€Ž B0828M34VL
    โ€ข Publication date โ€ : โ€Ž December 2, 2019
    โ€ข Language โ€ : โ€Ž English
    โ€ข File size โ€ : โ€Ž 952 KB
    โ€ข Text-to-Speech โ€ : โ€Ž Enabled
    โ€ข Screen Reader โ€ : โ€Ž Supported
    โ€ข Enhanced typesetting โ€ : โ€Ž Enabled
    โ€ข X-Ray โ€ : โ€Ž Not Enabled
    โ€ข Word Wise โ€ : โ€Ž Not Enabled
    โ€ข Print length โ€ : โ€Ž 105 pages
    โ€ข Lending โ€ : โ€Ž Enabled
    โ€ข Best Sellers Rank: #242,037 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store) โ—ฆ #36 in Calculus (Kindle Store)
    โ—ฆ #219 in Calculus (Books)


    #5-6, 75th published book

    TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 5 for age 20-21 Junior-year of College, math textbook series, book 6 Kindle Edition
    by Archimedes Plutonium 2019

    This is volume 5, book 6 of Teaching True Mathematics, designed for College Junior-year students, students of age 20-21. In first year college Calculus we learned calculus of the 2nd dimension and applied it to the equations of physics for electricity
    and magnetism. And in sophomore year we learned calculus of 3rd dimension to complete our study of the mathematics needed to do the physics of electricity and magnetism. Now, junior year college, we move onto something different, for we focus mostly on
    logic now and especially the logic of what is called the "mathematical proof". Much of what the student has learned about mathematics so far has been given to her or him as stated knowledge, accept it as true because I say so. But now we are going to do
    math proofs. Oh, yes, we did prove a few items here and there, such as why the Decimal Grid Number system is so special, such as the Pythagorean Theorem, such as the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus with its right-triangle hinged up or down. But many
    ideas we did not prove, we just stated them and expected all students to believe them true. And you are now juniors in college and we are going to start to prove many of those ideas and teach you "what is a math proof". Personally, I myself feel that the
    math proof is overrated, over hyped. But the math proof is important for one reason-- it makes you better scientists of knowing what is true and what is a shaky idea. A math proof is the same as "thinking straight and thinking clearly". And all
    scientists need to think straight and think clearly. But before we get to the Mathematics Proof, we have to do Probability and Statistics. What you learned in Grade School, then High School, then College, called Sigma Error, now becomes Probability and
    Statistics. It is important because all sciences including mathematics needs and uses Probability and Statistics. So, our job for junior-year of college mathematics is all cut out and ahead for us, no time to waste, let us get going.

    Cover Picture: is a sample of the Array Proof, a proof the ellipse is not a conic but rather a cylinder cut wherein the oval is the slant cut of a cone, not the ellipse.

    Length: 175 pages


    Product details
    ASIN : B0836F1YF6
    Publication date : December 26, 2019
    Language : English
    File size : 741 KB
    Text-to-Speech : Enabled
    Screen Reader : Supported
    Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
    X-Ray : Not Enabled
    Word Wise : Not Enabled
    Print length : 175 pages
    Lending : Enabled
    Best Sellers Rank: #3,768,255 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store) โ—ฆ #3,591 in Probability & Statistics (Kindle Store)
    โ—ฆ #19,091 in Probability & Statistics (Books)



    #5-7, 89th published book

    TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 6 for age 21-22 Senior-year of College, math textbook series, book 7 Kindle Edition
    by Archimedes Plutonium 2020

    Last revision was 6Feb2021.
    Preface: This is the last year of College for mathematics and we have to mostly summarize all of mathematics as best we can. And set a new pattern to prepare students going on to math graduate school. A new pattern of work habits, because graduate school
    is more of research and explore on your own. So in this final year, I am going to eliminate tests, and have it mostly done as homework assignments.

    Cover Picture: Again and again, many times in math, the mind is not good enough alone to think straight and clear, and you need tools to hands-on see how it works. Here is a collection of tools for this senior year college classes. There is a pencil,
    clipboard, graph paper, compass, divider, protractor, slide-ruler. And for this year we spend a lot of time on the parallelepiped, showing my wood model, and showing my erector set model held together by wire loops in the corners. The plastic square is
    there only to hold up the erector set model.

    Length: 110 pages

    Product details
    ASIN โ€ : โ€Ž B084V11BGY
    Publication date โ€ : โ€Ž February 15, 2020
    Language โ€ : โ€Ž English
    File size โ€ : โ€Ž 826 KB
    Text-to-Speech โ€ : โ€Ž Enabled
    Screen Reader โ€ : โ€Ž Supported
    Enhanced typesetting โ€ : โ€Ž Enabled
    X-Ray โ€ : โ€Ž Not Enabled
    Word Wise โ€ : โ€Ž Enabled
    Print length โ€ : โ€Ž 110 pages
    Lending โ€ : โ€Ž Enabled
    Best Sellers Rank: #224,965 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
    โ—ฆ #345 in Mathematics (Kindle Store)
    โ—ฆ #373 in Physics (Kindle Store)
    โ—ฆ #2,256 in Physics (Books)

    #5-8, 90th published book

    TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 7 for age 22-26 Graduate school, math textbook series, book 8 Kindle Edition
    by Archimedes Plutonium 2020

    Last revised 1NOV2020. This was AP's 90th published book of science.

    Preface: This is College Graduate School mathematics. Congratulations, you made it this far. To me, graduate school is mostly research, research mathematics and that means also physics. So it is going to be difficult to do math without physics. Of course,
    we focus on the mathematics of these research projects.

    My textbook for Graduate school is just a template and the professors teaching the graduate students are free of course to follow their own projects, but in terms of being physics and math combined. What I list below is a template for possible projects.

    So, in the below projects, I list 36 possible research projects that a graduate student my like to undertake, or partake. I list those 36 projects with a set of parentheses like this (1), (2), (3), etc. Not to be confused with the chapters listing as 1),
    2), 3), etc. I list 36 projects but the professor can offer his/her own list, and I expect students with their professor, to pick a project and to monitor the student as to his/her progresses through the research. I have listed each project then cited
    some of my own research into these projects, below each project is an entry. Those entries are just a help or helper in getting started or acquainted with the project. The entry has a date time group and a newsgroup that I posted to such as sci.math or
    plutonium-atom-universe Google newsgroups. Again the entry is just a help or helper in getting started.

    Now instead of picking one or two projects for your Graduate years of study, some may select all 36 projects where you write a short paper on each project. Some may be bored with just one or two projects and opt for all 36.

    Cover Picture: A photo by my iphone of a page on Permutations of the Jacobs book Mathematics: A Human Endeavor, 1970. One of the best textbooks ever written in Old Math, not for its contents because there are many errors, but for its teaching style. It
    is extremely rare to find a math textbook written for the student to learn. Probably because math professors rarely learned how to teach in the first place; only learned how to unintentionally obfuscate. The page I photographed is important because it is
    the interface between geometry's perimeter or surface area versus geometry's area or volume, respectively. Or, an interface of pure numbers with that of geometry. But I have more to say on this below.
    Length: 296 pages

    Product details
    ASIN โ€ : โ€Ž B085DF8R7V
    Publication date โ€ : โ€Ž March 1, 2020
    Language โ€ : โ€Ž English
    File size โ€ : โ€Ž 828 KB
    Text-to-Speech โ€ : โ€Ž Enabled
    Screen Reader โ€ : โ€Ž Supported
    Enhanced typesetting โ€ : โ€Ž Enabled
    X-Ray โ€ : โ€Ž Not Enabled
    Word Wise โ€ : โ€Ž Not Enabled
    Print length โ€ : โ€Ž 296 pages
    Lending โ€ : โ€Ž Enabled
    Best Sellers Rank: #224,981 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
    โ—ฆ #13 in General Geometry
    โ—ฆ #213 in Geometry & Topology (Books)


    #5-9, 221st published book

    An Education Ladder Guideline for teaching mathematics and a Test to see if you are cut out to be a mathematician//Teaching True Mathematics
    by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle)

    Preface: This book is written to improve math education in school and at home. Trouble is, you cannot improve math education if the professors of mathematics have much of their teachings in error. So I write this book mostly as a test for math professors
    because to shine a light on math professor failure is the best way to improve math teaching, and thereby improve school curriculums especially colleges and universities. But others, such as laypersons are welcomed to join in. And it is the laypersons and
    students that will make the greatest amount of use of this book because math professors are usually stubborn and idiotic and hard to change for the better. And so when students and laypersons keep asking questions of their math professors, their
    brainwashing and thus poor teaching, they eventually come around to the truth and then change their bad behavior and bad misunderstanding; to proper true mathematics.

    Cover Picture: Is my iphone photograph of a rubber washer inside a plastic cone. The washer is at a steep slant angle to the cone perpendicular. Notice the washer near the apex is fully touching the side of the cone, but the washer directed towards the
    base has not yet cut through the side of the cone, and you can see a rainbow or a crescent shape of area where the washer will intersect the side of the cone, (where my two finger are), making a total figure of a Oval, never the ellipse. I was taking
    this picture as one person, so I had the iphone camera in one hand and the cone in another hand, and had to use a rubber washer to stay in place. The same green plastic cone used in this picture appears in both of my published books of the proof slant
    cut of cone is oval, never the ellipse.

    My 3rd published book with the same green cone on cover.
    AP's Proof-Ellipse was never a Conic Section // Math proof series, book 1 Kindle Edition
    by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

    My 68th published book with the same green cone on cover.
    Proofs Ellipse is never a Conic section, always a Cylinder section and a Well Defined Oval definition//Student teaches professor series, book 5 Kindle Edition
    by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

    Product details
    โ€ข ASIN โ€ : โ€Ž B0BQDYMYKQ
    โ€ข Publication date โ€ : โ€Ž December 16, 2022
    โ€ข Language โ€ : โ€Ž English
    โ€ข File size โ€ : โ€Ž 551 KB
    โ€ข Text-to-Speech โ€ : โ€Ž Enabled
    โ€ข Screen Reader โ€ : โ€Ž Supported
    โ€ข Enhanced typesetting โ€ : โ€Ž Enabled
    โ€ข X-Ray โ€ : โ€Ž Not Enabled
    โ€ข Word Wise โ€ : โ€Ž Not Enabled
    โ€ข Sticky notes โ€ : โ€Ž On Kindle Scribe
    โ€ข Print length โ€ : โ€Ž 65 pages



    #5-10, 160th published book

    MATHOPEDIA-- List of 82 fakes and mistakes of Old Math// mathematics & logic by Archimedes Plutonium

    Preface:
    A Mathopedia is like a special type of encyclopedia on the subject of mathematics. It is about the assessment of the worth of mathematics and the subject material of mathematics. It is a overall examination and a evaluation of mathematics and its topics.

    The ordering of Mathopedia is not a alphabetic ordering, nor does it have a index. The ordering is purely that of importance at beginning and importance at end.

    The greatest use of Mathopedia is a guide to students of what not to waste your time on and what to focus most of your time. I know so many college classes in mathematics are just a total waste of time, waste of valuable time for the class is math fakery.
    I know because I have been there.

    Now I am going to cite various reference sources of AP books if anyone wants more details and can be seen in the Appendix at the end of the book.

    I suppose, going forward, mathematics should always have a mathopedia, where major parts of mathematics as a science are held under scrutiny and question as to correctness. In past history we have called these incidents as "doubters of the mainstream".
    Yet math, like physics, can have no permanent mainstream, since there is always question of correctness in physics, there then corresponds questions of correctness in mathematics (because math is a subset of physics). What I mean is that each future
    generation corrects some mistakes of past mathematics. If anyone is unsure of what I am saying here, both math and physics need constant correcting, of that which never belonged in science. This then converges with the logic-philosophy of Pragmatism (see
    AP's book of logic on Pragmatism).

    Product details
    โ€ข ASIN โ€ : โ€Ž B09MZTLRL5 and ASIN โ€ : โ€Ž B09ZWFLKHC
    โ€ข Publication date โ€ : โ€Ž December 2, 2021
    โ€ข Product details
    โ€ข ASIN โ€ : โ€Ž B09ZWFLKHC
    โ€ข Publication date โ€ : โ€Ž May 8, 2022
    โ€ข Language โ€ : โ€Ž English
    โ€ข File size โ€ : โ€Ž 1154 KB
    โ€ข Text-to-Speech โ€ : โ€Ž Enabled
    โ€ข Screen Reader โ€ : โ€Ž Supported
    โ€ข Enhanced typesetting โ€ : โ€Ž Enabled

    [continued in next message]

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Volney@21:1/5 to All on Tue Sep 19 21:34:05 2023
    โ˜ ๏ธ of Math and โ˜  of Physics Archimedes "antiscience" Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails at math and science:


    My 134th published book

    Introduction to TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 1 for ages 5 through 26, math textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
    by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)


    Why do you still keep trying to brainwash little 5 year old kids?



    WARNING TO STUDENTS, PARENTS and TEACHERS: Archimedes Plutonium is
    offering to teach your children his broken physics and math. BEWARE! He
    will corrupt the minds of your children! Mr. Plutonium is not content to
    be a failure of math and physics all by himself. He wants everyone else
    to fail as well! He teaches bizarre false physics and math, such as
    atoms contain the unstable muon, water is H4O and not H2O, the ellipse
    isn't a conic section, there are no negative numbers and no complex
    numbers, that a sine wave isn't sinusoidal but semicircles, cycloids or parabolas (depending on his mood), plus many, many other instances of
    bad math and physics.

    Plutonium has previously tried to corrupt our youth by posting his books
    on Usenet. That has failed until now, perhaps in part due to the fact
    Usenet is an old, dying medium, which few modern students even know of,
    much less use. However, Mr. Plutonium has somehow duped Amazon into
    providing his dangerous books for free on Kindle. This has greatly
    increased the danger to our students!

    One of his dangerous tricks is teach false Boolean logic such as 10 AND
    2 = 12. His method at doing this is particularly insidious. He'll post a
    false statement that nobody believes, such as 10 OR 2 = 12, say that it
    is false (which it is), but then he'll try to replace it with another
    similar false statement such as 10 AND 2 = 12, in order to really
    confuse future computer scientists. Plutonium is taking advantage of the
    fact that AND means different things in Boolean logic and elementary arithmetic, as AND is an informal synonym for plus/addition. It is
    important for future computer scientists to remember that in the bitwise Boolean logic used by modern computers, 10 OR 2 = 10 and 10 AND 2 = 2.
    Of course in pure Boolean logic the only possible values are true and
    false (1 or 0), so in pure Boolean logic the statements "10 AND 2" and
    "10 OR 2" don't even make sense. Don't let evil Plutonium's bad logic
    confuse you!

    Plutonium has been targeting children as young as 5. A new attempt to
    corrupt the minds of young children is to teach that the alphabet has 12 letters, 6 vowels and 6 consonants. This sounds like a great way to
    keep our children from reading!

    Nobody knows why Plutonium wishes to corrupt the minds of our youth like
    this. Perhaps Plutonium is envious of their potential success, which he
    never had because he is a failure at math and science. Plutonium is not
    content to be a failure at math and physics all by himself. He wants
    everyone to fail as well. Some claim Plutonium is an agent of China, in
    order for China to dominate the world economy. Maybe he is a minion of
    Kim Jong Un of North Korea. Most likely, however, he is an agent of
    Putin and Russia, since Plutonium has previously attempted to summon
    Russian robots in 2017 "to create a new, true mathematics" in an attempt
    to destroy mathematics.

    Additionally, Plutonium has started a Cult of Failure. He is trying to
    convince students to worship his evil pagan Plutonium atom god of
    Failure. This cult is anti-science and anti-mathematics. Its only goal
    is to promote failure in math and science.

    There is some evidence this Cult of Failure may be a suicide cult.
    Plutonium has advocated that the "good guy" nations join into a
    supernation and threaten to "flatten" the (nuclear armed) "bad guy"
    nations who misbehave. The idea may to initiate an all-out nuclear
    war when "bad guy" nations retaliate. Not simply is Plutonium or his
    cult committing suicide but would take Planet Earth with them. As the
    war in Ukraine continues, Plutonium keeps asking NATO to attack the
    Russians, starting a nuclear WW3, which he feels is unavoidable. More
    evidence of Plutonium's Cult of Failure being a suicide cult.

    Plutonium is now encouraging resistance fighters fighting the regimes
    in Russia and Iran to attack power lines in Tehran and Moscow by
    carrying long vertical aluminum poles under them, presumably to short
    them out, complete with a diagram. Obviously, this will not end well
    for for the resistance fighter. The question is, did he do this because
    he is Putin's stooge trying to kill off resistance fighters? Or is this
    part of Plutonium's Suicide Cult of Failure, meaning this is merely a suggestion how to commit suicide while failing to harm the regimes? Or
    both?

    But the point is, stay away, if he offers to give or sell you one of his dangerous books. Especially now since they are available for free from otherwise legitimate Amazon.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Volney@21:1/5 to All on Wed Sep 20 00:17:18 2023
    ๐Ÿฆ‡ of Math and ๐Ÿฆจ of Physics Archimedes "Drag Queen of Science"
    Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> blathered:


    My 134th published book

    Introduction to TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 1 for ages 5 through 26, math textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
    by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)


    Why do you still keep trying to brainwash little 5 year old kids?



    WARNING TO STUDENTS, PARENTS and TEACHERS: Archimedes Plutonium is
    offering to teach your children his broken physics and math. BEWARE! He
    will corrupt the minds of your children! Mr. Plutonium is not content to
    be a failure of math and physics all by himself. He wants everyone else
    to fail as well! He teaches bizarre false physics and math, such as
    atoms contain the unstable muon, water is H4O and not H2O, the ellipse
    isn't a conic section, there are no negative numbers and no complex
    numbers, that a sine wave isn't sinusoidal but semicircles, cycloids or parabolas (depending on his mood), plus many, many other instances of
    bad math and physics.

    Plutonium has previously tried to corrupt our youth by posting his books
    on Usenet. That has failed until now, perhaps in part due to the fact
    Usenet is an old, dying medium, which few modern students even know of,
    much less use. However, Mr. Plutonium has somehow duped Amazon into
    providing his dangerous books for free on Kindle. This has greatly
    increased the danger to our students!

    One of his dangerous tricks is teach false Boolean logic such as 10 AND
    2 = 12. His method at doing this is particularly insidious. He'll post a
    false statement that nobody believes, such as 10 OR 2 = 12, say that it
    is false (which it is), but then he'll try to replace it with another
    similar false statement such as 10 AND 2 = 12, in order to really
    confuse future computer scientists. Plutonium is taking advantage of the
    fact that AND means different things in Boolean logic and elementary arithmetic, as AND is an informal synonym for plus/addition. It is
    important for future computer scientists to remember that in the bitwise Boolean logic used by modern computers, 10 OR 2 = 10 and 10 AND 2 = 2.
    Of course in pure Boolean logic the only possible values are true and
    false (1 or 0), so in pure Boolean logic the statements "10 AND 2" and
    "10 OR 2" don't even make sense. Don't let evil Plutonium's bad logic
    confuse you!

    Plutonium has been targeting children as young as 5. A new attempt to
    corrupt the minds of young children is to teach that the alphabet has 12 letters, 6 vowels and 6 consonants. This sounds like a great way to
    keep our children from reading!

    Nobody knows why Plutonium wishes to corrupt the minds of our youth like
    this. Perhaps Plutonium is envious of their potential success, which he
    never had because he is a failure at math and science. Plutonium is not
    content to be a failure at math and physics all by himself. He wants
    everyone to fail as well. Some claim Plutonium is an agent of China, in
    order for China to dominate the world economy. Maybe he is a minion of
    Kim Jong Un of North Korea. Most likely, however, he is an agent of
    Putin and Russia, since Plutonium has previously attempted to summon
    Russian robots in 2017 "to create a new, true mathematics" in an attempt
    to destroy mathematics.

    Additionally, Plutonium has started a Cult of Failure. He is trying to
    convince students to worship his evil pagan Plutonium atom god of
    Failure. This cult is anti-science and anti-mathematics. Its only goal
    is to promote failure in math and science.

    There is some evidence this Cult of Failure may be a suicide cult.
    Plutonium has advocated that the "good guy" nations join into a
    supernation and threaten to "flatten" the (nuclear armed) "bad guy"
    nations who misbehave. The idea may to initiate an all-out nuclear
    war when "bad guy" nations retaliate. Not simply is Plutonium or his
    cult committing suicide but would take Planet Earth with them. As the
    war in Ukraine continues, Plutonium keeps asking NATO to attack the
    Russians, starting a nuclear WW3, which he feels is unavoidable. More
    evidence of Plutonium's Cult of Failure being a suicide cult.

    Plutonium is now encouraging resistance fighters fighting the regimes
    in Russia and Iran to attack power lines in Tehran and Moscow by
    carrying long vertical aluminum poles under them, presumably to short
    them out, complete with a diagram. Obviously, this will not end well
    for for the resistance fighter. The question is, did he do this because
    he is Putin's stooge trying to kill off resistance fighters? Or is this
    part of Plutonium's Suicide Cult of Failure, meaning this is merely a suggestion how to commit suicide while failing to harm the regimes? Or
    both?

    But the point is, stay away, if he offers to give or sell you one of his dangerous books. Especially now since they are available for free from otherwise legitimate Amazon.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Archimedes Plutonium@21:1/5 to Michael Moroney on Tue Sep 19 22:59:33 2023
    Kibo's photos of The Pope
    ๐Ÿฆ‡ of Math and ๐Ÿฆจ of Physics "Drag Queen of Science"
    On Tuesday, September 19, 2023 at 11:17:24โ€ฏPM UTC-5, Volney wrote:-- Kibo defiled and demonized AP for 30 years nonstop, let us stop his defiling of The Pope.






    Volney Physics failures..CalTech_Dr.David Goodstein,Dr.Frances Arnold (chem), Dr.Barry Barish, Dr.Rudolph Marcus (chem), Dr.Hugh Politzer NSF Dr.Panchanathan,Alejandro Adem, Purdue Univ_France Cordova,

    Physics failures..Rensselaer,Dr.Esther A. Wertz,Dr.Heidi Jo Newberg,Dr.Glenn Ciolek,Dr.Charles Martin,Dr.Joseph Darryl Michael,NSF Dr.Panchanathan,Alejandro Adem,Purdue Univ_France Cordova,..

    Why Volney?? Because they are so sloppy and slipshod in Physics experiment of Water Electrolysis, stopping and ceasing the experiment before weighing the mass of the hydrogen compared to mass of oxygen. Is it that they are stupid silly thinking volume
    and mass are the same. For AP needs to prove decisively, if Water is really H4O or H2O. And of course, this experiment would destroy the Standard Model-- that post-diction theory of physics that never gave a single prediction in all of its tenure.

    And they even know that a weighing balance of Quartz Crystal MicroBalance has been around since the 1960s, what are they waiting for???

    Or is it because they cannot admit the truth of math geometry that slant cut of cone is oval, not ellipse for you need the symmetry of slant cut of cylinder to yield a ellipse.



    Volney
    3
    Dan Christensen using TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS at Univ Western Ontario instead of the fake Old Math calculus with its thousands of rules and memorization of trig functions. New Math has 1 rule-- Power Rule
    9:03โ€ฏPM
    ๎ บ

    ,
    Volney
    3
    WM using AP's TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS to teach 13-14 year olds CALCULUS, those heading for Gottingen & Uni Berlin for AP reduced Calculus to its most simple form-- add or subtract 1 from exponent.
    9:01โ€ฏPM
    ๎ บ

    182b-Volney uses TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS to teach 13-14 year olds CALCULUS, those heading for Berkeley,Caltech, Stanford, for AP reduced Calculus to its most simple form-- add or subtract 1 from exponent.
    8:52โ€ฏPM
    ๎ บ

    ,
    Volney
    2
    Volney uses TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS to teach 13-14 year olds CALCULUS, those heading for Berkeley,Caltech, Stanford, for AP reduced Calculus to its most simple form-- add or subtract 1 from exponent.
    8:45โ€ฏPM
    ๎ บ
    Dan Christensen's profile photo
    Dan Christensen
    , โ€ฆ
    Volney
    14
    unread,
    Re: Dr.Terence Tao along with Dr. Gene D.Block fired from UCLA for teaching propaganda -- truth is slant cut of cone is Oval, never the ellipse, yet UCLA continues their propaganda of ellipse as slant cut.
    8:43โ€ฏPM
    ๎ บ


    Caltech Physics Dept

    Felix Boehm, Steven Frautschi
    Murray Gell-Mann, David Goodstein, Thomas Phillips,
    John Schwarz, Barry Simon, Kip Thorne, Petr Vogel,
    Rochus Vogt, Ward Whaling, Michael E. Brown,
    Konstantin Batygin, Dr.Frances Arnold (chem), Dr.Barry Barish, Dr.Rudolph Marcus (chem), Dr.Hugh Politzer

    Apparently Kibo realized he was a science failure when he could not even do a proper percentage. But then one has to wonder how much he paid to bribe Rensselaer to graduate from the school in engineering unable to do a percentage properly???? For I
    certainly would not hire a engineer who cannot even do proper percentage.


    On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
    Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon. Hardly "exactly" 9 muons.
    Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
    Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572. A proton is about the mass
    of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.


    Why Volney?? Because they stop short of completing the Water Electrolysis Experiment by only looking at volume, when they are meant to weigh the mass of hydrogen versus oxygen?? Such shoddy minds in experimental physics and chemistry.

    Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Physics dept Dr.Martin Schmidt (ee), Dr.Ivar Giaever
    Vincent Meunier, Ethan Brown, Glenn Ciolek, Julian S. Georg, Joel T. Giedt, Yong Sung Kim, Gyorgy Korniss, Toh-Ming Lu, Charles Martin, Joseph Darryl Michael, Heidi Jo Newberg, Moussa N'Gom, Peter Persans, John Schroeder, Michael Shur, Shawn-Yu Lin,
    Humberto Terrones, Gwo Ching Wang, Morris A Washington, Esther A. Wertz, Christian M. Wetzel, Ingrid Wilke, Shengbai Zhang

    Rensselaer math department
    Donald Schwendeman, Jeffrey Banks, Kristin Bennett, Mohamed Boudjelkha, Joseph Ecker, William Henshaw, Isom Herron, Mark H Holmes, David Isaacson, Elizabeth Kam, Ashwani Kapila, Maya Kiehl, Gregor Kovacic, Peter Kramer, Gina Kucinski, Rongjie Lai,
    Fengyan Li, Chjan Lim, Yuri V Lvov, Harry McLaughlin, John E. Mitchell, Bruce Piper, David A Schmidt, Daniel Stevenson, Yangyang Xu, Bulent Yener, Donald Drew, William Siegmann

    On Friday, June 7, 2019 at 12:13:14 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
    Physics minnow
    WARNING TO ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING STUDENTS:

    What warning is that Kibo Parry failure of science-- warning that insane persons like Kibo Parry Moroney Volney spends their entire life in a hate-mill, never doing anything in science itself. And paid to stalk hate spew

    Kibo Parry Moroney-Volney blowing his cover with the CIA in 1997
    Re: Archimedes Vanadium, America's most beloved poster
    On Sunday, June 8, 1997 at 2:00:00 AM UTC-5, Scott Dorsey wrote:
    In article <5nefan$i06$9...@news.thecia.net> kibo greps <ki...@shell.thecia.net> writes:



    ---quoting Wikipedia ---
    Controversy
    Many government and university installations blocked, threatened to block, or attempted to shut-down The World's Internet connection until Software Tool & Die was eventually granted permission by the National Science Foundation to provide public
    Internet access on "an experimental basis."
    --- end quote ---

    NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

    Dr. Panchanathan , present day
    NSF Dr. Panchanathan, F. Fleming Crim, Dorothy E Aronson, Brian Stone, James S Ulvestad (math), Rebecca Lynn Keiser, Vernon D. Ross, Lloyd Whitman, John J. Veysey (physics), Scott Stanley
    France Anne Cordova
    Subra Suresh (bioengineer)
    Arden Lee Bement Jr. (nuclear engineering)
    Rita R. Colwell (microbiology)
    Neal Francis Lane
    John Howard Gibbons 1993

    Barry Shein, kibo parry std world
    Jim Frost, Joe "Spike" Ilacqua

    Canada-- NSERC , Alejandro Adem (math) , Navdeep Bains, Francois-Philippe Champagne


    News starting to come in that AP's Water Electrolysis Experiment proves the true formula of Water is H4O, not H2O is starting to come in.

    Aug 30, 2023, 10:19:20โ€ฏPM
    to Plutonium Atom Universe
    News starting to come in that AP's Water Electrolysis Experiment proves the true formula of Water is H4O, not H2O is starting to come in.

    I received a letter today
  • From Volney@21:1/5 to All on Wed Sep 20 23:54:43 2023
    โ˜ ๏ธ of Math and โ˜  of Physics Archimedes "antiscience" Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails at math and science:

    My 134th published book

    Introduction to TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 1 for ages 5 through 26, math textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
    by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

    Why do you still keep trying to brainwash little 5 year old kids?



    WARNING TO STUDENTS, PARENTS and TEACHERS: Archimedes Plutonium is
    offering to teach your children his broken physics and math. BEWARE! He
    will corrupt the minds of your children! Mr. Plutonium is not content to
    be a failure of math and physics all by himself. He wants everyone else
    to fail as well! He teaches bizarre false physics and math, such as
    atoms contain the unstable muon, water is H4O and not H2O, the ellipse
    isn't a conic section, there are no negative numbers and no complex
    numbers, that a sine wave isn't sinusoidal but semicircles, cycloids or parabolas (depending on his mood), plus many, many other instances of
    bad math and physics.

    Plutonium has previously tried to corrupt our youth by posting his books
    on Usenet. That has failed until now, perhaps in part due to the fact
    Usenet is an old, dying medium, which few modern students even know of,
    much less use. However, Mr. Plutonium has somehow duped Amazon into
    providing his dangerous books for free on Kindle. This has greatly
    increased the danger to our students!

    One of his dangerous tricks is teach false Boolean logic such as 10 AND
    2 = 12. His method at doing this is particularly insidious. He'll post a
    false statement that nobody believes, such as 10 OR 2 = 12, say that it
    is false (which it is), but then he'll try to replace it with another
    similar false statement such as 10 AND 2 = 12, in order to really
    confuse future computer scientists. Plutonium is taking advantage of the
    fact that AND means different things in Boolean logic and elementary arithmetic, as AND is an informal synonym for plus/addition. It is
    important for future computer scientists to remember that in the bitwise Boolean logic used by modern computers, 10 OR 2 = 10 and 10 AND 2 = 2.
    Of course in pure Boolean logic the only possible values are true and
    false (1 or 0), so in pure Boolean logic the statements "10 AND 2" and
    "10 OR 2" don't even make sense. Don't let evil Plutonium's bad logic
    confuse you!

    Plutonium has been targeting children as young as 5. A new attempt to
    corrupt the minds of young children is to teach that the alphabet has 12 letters, 6 vowels and 6 consonants. This sounds like a great way to
    keep our children from reading!

    Nobody knows why Plutonium wishes to corrupt the minds of our youth like
    this. Perhaps Plutonium is envious of their potential success, which he
    never had because he is a failure at math and science. Plutonium is not
    content to be a failure at math and physics all by himself. He wants
    everyone to fail as well. Some claim Plutonium is an agent of China, in
    order for China to dominate the world economy. Maybe he is a minion of
    Kim Jong Un of North Korea. Most likely, however, he is an agent of
    Putin and Russia, since Plutonium has previously attempted to summon
    Russian robots in 2017 "to create a new, true mathematics" in an attempt
    to destroy mathematics.

    Additionally, Plutonium has started a Cult of Failure. He is trying to
    convince students to worship his evil pagan Plutonium atom god of
    Failure. This cult is anti-science and anti-mathematics. Its only goal
    is to promote failure in math and science.

    There is some evidence this Cult of Failure may be a suicide cult.
    Plutonium has advocated that the "good guy" nations join into a
    supernation and threaten to "flatten" the (nuclear armed) "bad guy"
    nations who misbehave. The idea may to initiate an all-out nuclear
    war when "bad guy" nations retaliate. Not simply is Plutonium or his
    cult committing suicide but would take Planet Earth with them. As the
    war in Ukraine continues, Plutonium keeps asking NATO to attack the
    Russians, starting a nuclear WW3, which he feels is unavoidable. More
    evidence of Plutonium's Cult of Failure being a suicide cult.

    Plutonium is now encouraging resistance fighters fighting the regimes
    in Russia and Iran to attack power lines in Tehran and Moscow by
    carrying long vertical aluminum poles under them, presumably to short
    them out, complete with a diagram. Obviously, this will not end well
    for for the resistance fighter. The question is, did he do this because
    he is Putin's stooge trying to kill off resistance fighters? Or is this
    part of Plutonium's Suicide Cult of Failure, meaning this is merely a suggestion how to commit suicide while failing to harm the regimes? Or
    both?

    But the point is, stay away, if he offers to give or sell you one of his dangerous books. Especially now since they are available for free from otherwise legitimate Amazon.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Archimedes Plutonium@21:1/5 to Volney on Wed Sep 20 20:46:15 2023
    Dr.Cordova, The Pope defiled by Kibo
    Gnat of Math and Phlea of Physics"always wrong" "Psycho"
    On Sunday, September 17, 2023 at 1:31:19โ€ฏAM UTC-5, Volney wrote:-- Kibo Parry Moroney Volney a bully attack dog defiler and demonizer for nonstop 30 years. Dr. Veysey and Dr. Cordova, please help put Kibo in prison or asylum where he belongs.

    Volney posts imply---
    NSF Dr.Panchanathan loves TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS, for in one class lesson of High School the bulk of Calculus can be taught, by polynomials add or subtract 1 to exponent.

    Dr.Panchanathan cannot understand the reluctance of Catholic schools like Purdue Uni and Uni of Dayton in accepting TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS-- maybe they like torture chambers of Old Math with their thousands of different functions and their thousands
    of rules for each.

    TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS, AP seeks the super easiest calculus possible on Earth-- polynomials as the only valid functions-- thus, and therefore, making derivative and integral as easy as Power Rule- 14 year olds master calculus

    Old Math makes and keeps Calculus as classroom torture chambers with their 1,000s of different functions yet the polynomial is the only valid function of math, and makes it super super easy to learn calculus.
    If you come to me with a pathetic non polynomial, I have you go home and convert your nonsense to a polynomial. The Lagrange interpolation converts stupid nonfunctions like trig, into valid functions of polynomials.

    the 30 year nonstop stalker Kibo Parry Moroney-Volney
    On Friday, September 15, 2023 at 5:37:32โ€ฏPM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
    "goonclod failure of logic"

    TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS textbooks, makes calculus as easy as adding or subtracting 1 from exponent--only valid functions are polynomials contrast with mainstream--vomiting during exams, torture chamber and nervous breakdown by sado-masochist teachers.
    Old Math is thousands of different kook functions with thousands of different rules. AP Calculus is one function-- the polynomial for we care about truth in math, not on whether kooks of math become rich and famous off the suffering-backs of students put
    through a torture chamber that is present day calculus. If you come to math with a function that is not a polynomial, you have to convert it to a polynomial. Once converted, calculus is super super easy. But math professors seem to enjoy torturing
    students, not teaching them. Psychology teaches us that when a kook goes through a torture chamber and comes out of it as a math professor-- they want to be vindictive and sado masochists and love to torture others and put them through the same torture
    chamber that they went through. AP says-- stop this cycle of torture and teach TRUE CORRECT MATH.



    TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS, AP seeks the super easiest calculus possible on Earth-- polynomials as the only valid functions-- thus, and therefore, making derivative and integral as easy as Power Rule- 14 year olds master calculus

    TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS textbooks, makes calculus as easy as adding or subtracting 1 from exponent--only valid functions are polynomials contrast with mainstream--vomiting during exams, torture chamber and nervous breakdown by sado-masochist teachers.
    Old Math is thousands of different kook functions with thousands of different rules. AP Calculus is one function-- the polynomial for we care about truth in math, not on whether kooks of math become rich and famous off the suffering of students put
    through a torture chamber that is present day calculus. If you come to math with a function that is not a polynomial, you have to convert it to a polynomial. Once converted, calculus is super super easy. But math professors seem to enjoy torturing
    students, not teaching them.

    Old Math calculus textbooks like Stewart are more than 1,000 pages long and they need that because they have a mindless thousand different functions and no valid proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. AP's calculus is less than 300 pages, because we
    have a valid geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus which demands the only valid function of math be a polynomial function. We can teach calculus in Junior High School for the calculus is reduced to adding or subtracting 1 from the exponent.
    The only hard part of calculus in New Math is to convert the boneheaded function into a polynomial that was brought to the table by the boneheaded math professor who thinks that a function does not need to be a polynomial.

    AP calculus transforms the calculus classroom. It is no longer vomiting during exams. No longer a torture chamber for our students of youth, and no longer a nightmare nor nervous breakdown for our youthful students, who, all they ever wanted was the
    truth of mathematics.

    Teaches that derivative predicts next point of function graph--silly Old Math has derivative as tangent to function graph unable to predict. The great power of Calculus is integral is area under function graph thus physics energy, and its prediction
    power of the derivative to predict the next future point of function graph thus making the derivative a "law of physics as predictor". Stupid Old Math makes the derivative a tangent line, while New Math makes the derivative the predictor of next point of
    function graph. No wonder no-one in Old Math could do a geometry, let alone a valid proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, for no-one in Old Math even had the mind to realize Calculus predicts the future point in the derivative.

    AP has managed to make sci.math a battlefield where AP is alone on one side and every other poster is either a direct attack on AP or an indirect attack on AP such as Markus, Gabriel, Thomasson, WM trying to push AP off the front page. While over in sci.
    physics, the maintenance team at sci.physics still have control of the helm. But sci.math is without a helmsman and rudderless. Quite a spectacle, and time for a change of personnel ISP of sci.math to be at least like sci.physics. I do not know how much
    of this if any, is the fault of NSF Dr.Panchanathan, Kibo Parry Moron-ey-Volney, Tim Skirvin, Gilbert Strang...

    TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS-- only math textbooks with a valid proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus--teaches that derivative predicts next point of function graph--silly Old Math has derivative as tangent to function graph unable to predict. This is
    why calculus is so important for physics, like a law of physics-- predicts the future given nearby point, predicts the next point. And of course the integral tells us the energy. Silly stupid Old Math understood the integral as area under the function
    graph curve, but were stupid silly as to the understanding of derivative-- predict the next point as seen in this illustration:


    From this rectangle of the integral with points A, midpoint then B


    ______
    | |
    | |
    | |
    ---------


    To this trapezoid with points A, m, B

    B
    /|
    / |
    m /----|
    / |
    | |
    |____|


    The trapezoid roof has to be a straight-line segment (the derivative)
    so that it can be hinged at m, and swiveled down to form rectangle for integral.

    Or going in reverse. From rectangle, the right triangle predicts the next successor point of function graph curve of B, from that of midpoint m and initial point of function graph A.


    My 134th published book

    Introduction to TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 1 for ages 5 through 26, math textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
    by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

    ๎—“
    TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 3 for age 18-19, 1st year College Calculus, math textbook series, book 3 Kindle Edition
    by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
    ๎—“
    COLLEGE CALCULUS GUIDE to help students recognize math professor spam from math truth & reality// math textbook series, book 4 Kindle Edition

    by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)


    #1 New Releasein 15-Minute Science & Math Short Reads


    This textbook is the companion guide book to AP's Teaching True Mathematics, 1st year College. It is realized that Old Math will take a long time in removing their fake math, so in the interim period, this Guide book is designed to speed up the process
    of removing fake Calculus out of the education system, the fewer students we punish with forcing them with fake Calculus, the better we are.
    Cover Picture: This book is part comedy, for when you cannot reason with math professors that they have many errors to fix, that 90% of their Calculus is in error, you end up resorting to comedy, making fun of them, to prod them to fix their errors. To
    prod them to "do right by the students of the world" not their entrenched propaganda.
    Length: 54 pages


    Product details
    File Size: 1035 KB
    Print Length: 64 pages
    Simultaneous Device Usage: Unlimited
    Publication Date: August 18, 2019
    Sold by: Amazon.com Services LLC
    Language: English
    ASIN: B07WNGLQ85
    Text-to-Speech: Enabled
    X-Ray: โ€จNot Enabled โ€จ
    Word Wise: Not Enabled
    Lending: Enabled
    Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled
    Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #253,425 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
    #38 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
    #318 in Calculus (Books)
    #48 in Calculus (Kindle Store)
    โ€จ
    #5-5, 72nd published book

    TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 4 for age 19-20 Sophomore-year College, math textbook series, book 5 Kindle Edition
    by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
    ๎—“
    AP's Proof-Ellipse was never a Conic Section // Math proof series, book 1 Kindle Edition
    by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

    My 68th published book with the same green cone on cover.
    Proofs Ellipse is never a Conic section, always a Cylinder section and a Well Defined Oval definition//Student teaches professor series, book 5 Kindle Edition
    by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
    ๎—“
    ๎—“
    Let me run a scenario for you, please.

    There are 7-8 billion people on Earth today.

    In the past 50 years we can roughly say that 50 million people studied Calculus in school or at home.

    50 million people tried and attempted to learn calculus math.

    I certainly was one amoung that 50 million.

    And was AP the only one in 50 million to recognize that if you take polynomials as being the Only Valid Function that the Calculus becomes the Easiest, Super Easy math, because the Power Rules apply and where the derivative is simply a subtract 1 from
    exponent and the integral is add 1 to exponent.

    I find it extremely sad and hard to believe that only AP saw how to make Calculus Super super super easy? Surely there must have been at least 25 million of those 50 million who found the derivative and integral of polynomials a joy and pleasure to do.
    Surely AP was not the only person in 50 million to see the Polynomial Calculus was a pleasure, fun and even exciting, rush to class to do a derivative or integral of a polynomial-- teacher, please give me more polynomial exercises. They are better than
    Star Trek on TV.

    This is the whole point of a Revolution in Math Calculus.

    When we make the only valid function in all of math be a Polynomial, we reduce calculus to adding 1 or subtracting 1.

    We do not allow creeps, goons and kooks to clutter the table of math and calculus with their horrible awful smelly functions which are not polynomials. No, we disband these kooks and tell them go home and convert your worthless crap to be a polynomial
    before you can stink up the halls of mathematics. Convert your kook nonsense to a polynomial then you can come and do mathematics with us.

    AP, King of Science

    ๎—“
    As a case in point, a mere example.

    We have at MIT a Dr. Gilbert Strang with his Calculus textbooks, and I bought the 1991 edition of Calculus. And my opinion of Strang's text is scatterbrained. For I often find that Gilbert in lecturing on a topic is too quick to bring in side show issues,
    never focusing on just one topic.

    But worst of this Strang text is he has no valid proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus FTC, no geometry proof and his Limit analysis of FTC is idiot of a proof-- ie-- no proof at all, for we all analyze things in the course of a day, and none of us
    are so preposterous as to think we have proven something above and beyond analyzing that something.

    And so, I, AP reflects back to the time of 1968, when my name was Ludwig Hansen, sitting in a geology classroom of University of Cincinnati. Learning geology from a textbook that never discusses Continental Drift and this is 1968, mind you and Wegener
    had given massive evidence of Continental Drift way back to 1915, some 53 years later, AP and the classroom suffering from Truth of Science by having to buy a book about static-Earth, being tested graded lectured upon fake geology.

    Not much difference from students sitting in classrooms at MIT or elsewhere buying Strang's CALCULUS with no valid proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, and where any fool function is allowed to enter, thousands and thousands of fool functions, when
    Mathematics has only one Valid Function-- the Polynomial function. For you can only arrive at a True Valid Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus by using polynomials as functions.

    So how many students every year are punished by having to learn calculus with fool functions, with no valid proof of FTC. Where the calculus classroom puts students not through a Pleasure learning session but a gauntlet torture chamber, whipping the
    students into nervous breakdowns and vomiting during exams.

    All for what??? How much money does Dr. Strang make from his awful book Calculus?? Let me guess estimate.

    The book probably costs $100 in our inflation environment. And typically a author gets 1/2 of that in royalties.

    Say MIT teaches a class of 100 students in calculus per year would be 50 x 100 = $5,000. And say a estimate that around the world there are 100 schools teaching from this book of 100 students in their classroom would make Gilbert $500,000 per year in
    book sales of his Calculus.

    Same can be said of AP back in 1968 having to learn fake geology with no Continental Drift plate tectonics, so that some so called scientists reaps a reward of 1/2 a million dollars in book sales. And that thousands of students taught lectured and tested
    upon fake geology.

    This is one of the grand benefits of a Usenet and a Internet, that we speed up the process of throwing out Fake -Math, fake-geology and all other fake sciences. Freedom of Speech of Internet of Usenet allows for science to be Showered, Cleaned UP, bathed
    from its wretched stink of Old fake science. Clean Up their science.

    The only valid functions in mathematics are Polynomial Functions, which in turn, makes Calculus be super super super easy. No more vomiting by students in a calculus exam. No more nervous breakdowns by students taking calculus.

    AP

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Volney@21:1/5 to All on Sun Oct 22 11:25:12 2023
    ๐Ÿฆ‡ of Math and ๐Ÿฆจ of Physics Archimedes "Drag Queen of Science"
    Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> blathered:

    Alright, today this book takes a massive boost forward, for I found out that the Medical Infrared Thermometer also shoots out a ray of Light Waves, but is a infrared ray, not a visible light laser ray.

    The letters in "Archimedes Plutonium" can be re-arranged to spell "Demon
    Cult: Raise him Up!"

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)