Arindam Banerjee:
Einstein predicted just this, a single experiment wouldWhy don't you refer to such "prior art" as the Dayton Miller
turn his works into rubble.
aether-drift experiments:
https://ether-wind.narod.ru/Miller_1933/Miller1933_ocr.pdf
and its numerous later repetitions in both optical and
radio-wave ranges by Galaev, Demyanov, Shtyrkov, and others?
On Monday, 20 February 2023 at 20:42:43 UTC+11, Anton Shepelev wrote:
Arindam Banerjee:
Einstein predicted just this, a single experiment wouldWhy don't you refer to such "prior art" as the Dayton Miller
turn his works into rubble.
aether-drift experiments:
https://ether-wind.narod.ru/Miller_1933/Miller1933_ocr.pdf
Pretty detailed, just glanced through it to see whether it debunks the MMI as I did in 2005.
and its numerous later repetitions in both optical and
radio-wave ranges by Galaev, Demyanov, Shtyrkov, and others?
They do not acknowledge that the MMI nulls occur because the Earth is moving. The Earth moves in space.
By the time the light reaches the other end, the other end has moved, so the light travels longer or shorter actually in free space.
This was the subtle they all missed, hopefully not deliberately.
Now, they simply ignore this bungle that I pointed out in 2005.
Just as they ignore that the light bending from the eclipse is just an optical effect, caused by the matter around the sun acting as a lens.
To elaborate on what suits the dogma, and neglect any contrary opinions is highly dishonest.
But that is exactly what all physicists are, who ignore my works.
Now, the nulls are explained simply by the kinetic nature of light - the c(v=V)=c+V, where V is the speed of the emitter.
But admitting that would smash the theories of relativity, and make the physicists look like babbling baboons.
Anything but that, what.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 300 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 98:01:41 |
Calls: | 6,699 |
Calls today: | 4 |
Files: | 12,232 |
Messages: | 5,349,459 |