• The MMI bungling

    From Arindam Banerjee@21:1/5 to Anton Shepelev on Mon Feb 20 07:47:09 2023
    On Monday, 20 February 2023 at 20:42:43 UTC+11, Anton Shepelev wrote:
    Arindam Banerjee:
    Einstein predicted just this, a single experiment would
    turn his works into rubble.
    Why don't you refer to such "prior art" as the Dayton Miller
    aether-drift experiments:

    https://ether-wind.narod.ru/Miller_1933/Miller1933_ocr.pdf

    Pretty detailed, just glanced through it to see whether it debunks the MMI as I did in 2005.

    and its numerous later repetitions in both optical and
    radio-wave ranges by Galaev, Demyanov, Shtyrkov, and others?

    They do not acknowledge that the MMI nulls occur because the Earth is moving. The Earth moves in space.
    By the time the light reaches the other end, the other end has moved, so the light travels longer or shorter actually in free space.
    This was the subtle they all missed, hopefully not deliberately.

    Now, they simply ignore this bungle that I pointed out in 2005.
    Just as they ignore that the light bending from the eclipse is just an optical effect, caused by the matter around the sun acting as a lens.
    To elaborate on what suits the dogma, and neglect any contrary opinions is highly dishonest.
    But that is exactly what all physicists are, who ignore my works.
    Now, the nulls are explained simply by the kinetic nature of light - the c(v=V)=c+V, where V is the speed of the emitter.

    But admitting that would smash the theories of relativity, and make the physicists look like babbling baboons.
    Anything but that, what.

    Cheers,
    Arindam Banerjee

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Volney@21:1/5 to Arindam Banerjee on Mon Feb 20 12:39:23 2023
    On 2/20/2023 10:47 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
    On Monday, 20 February 2023 at 20:42:43 UTC+11, Anton Shepelev wrote:
    Arindam Banerjee:
    Einstein predicted just this, a single experiment would
    turn his works into rubble.
    Why don't you refer to such "prior art" as the Dayton Miller
    aether-drift experiments:

    https://ether-wind.narod.ru/Miller_1933/Miller1933_ocr.pdf

    Pretty detailed, just glanced through it to see whether it debunks the MMI as I did in 2005.

    and its numerous later repetitions in both optical and
    radio-wave ranges by Galaev, Demyanov, Shtyrkov, and others?

    They do not acknowledge that the MMI nulls occur because the Earth is moving. The Earth moves in space.
    By the time the light reaches the other end, the other end has moved, so the light travels longer or shorter actually in free space.
    This was the subtle they all missed, hopefully not deliberately.

    That is how it was SUPPOSED TO work! The earth moves in space against
    the aether so round trip times in the direction of motion were different
    from round trip times at right angles. But it was not so. So that form
    of aether was ruled out as impossible.

    Now, they simply ignore this bungle that I pointed out in 2005.

    You didn't "point out" anything that wasn't expected in the late 1800s!

    Just as they ignore that the light bending from the eclipse is just an optical effect, caused by the matter around the sun acting as a lens.

    The "matter around the sun" that supposedly bends the light is a better
    vacuum than can be created on the earth. The index of refraction of that near-vacuum is nowhere near strong enough to have an effect. Plus, the exoplanet searches had to compensate for the bending of light at RIGHT
    ANGLES to the sun. Do you claim the solar atmosphere bends light as far
    as the earth's orbit?????

    To elaborate on what suits the dogma, and neglect any contrary opinions is highly dishonest.
    But that is exactly what all physicists are, who ignore my works.

    Conspiracy theories without evidence. Crank sign. Your "works" are
    ignored because 1) you're wrong; and 2) you never provide enough info/measurements/a proper paper for your "discoveries" to be useful to
    anyone.

    Now, the nulls are explained simply by the kinetic nature of light - the c(v=V)=c+V, where V is the speed of the emitter.

    Already proven false by experiments, in particular the MMX.

    But admitting that would smash the theories of relativity, and make the physicists look like babbling baboons.
    Anything but that, what.

    One single experiment with results that ran counter to relativity would
    rule it out. So far, that has never happened.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Archimedes Plutonium@21:1/5 to All on Mon Feb 20 13:03:33 2023
    Moscow & Irkutsk no electricity█۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█
    _drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity

    Knock out electricity in
    Novosibirsk
    Yekaterinburg
    Novgorod
    Samara
    Omsk
    Kazan
    Rostov-na-Donu
    Chelyabinsk
    Ufa
    Perm
    Irkutsk


    _Every Russian missile fired into Ukraine met with a drone from Ukraine knocking out Moscow electric power lines

    _Give Ukraine drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity

    _No one can win a fight or war without any offence, West, Biden give Ukraine drones that knock out electricity inside Russia

    _End the Ukraine war by March 2023 as the Russian people depose the dictator

    _rolling electric blackouts and give Iran to Iraq-- a blooming democracy, not a stupid dictator

    _And as the Baby Xi grew up from the rice paddies and reeds of Outer Manchuria, stolen by the Naxi and Zani Dictator Putin in Moscow, Xi learned in school in chemical engineering that Taiwan was 1/28 the size of Outer Manchuria, as Putin bombs Ukraine.
    And the nascent Xi orders 1,000 divisions to the Outer Manchuria border to regain back the stolen Old China.

    _Xi has 1,000 divisions on Vladivostok border ready to swoop in and reclaim the stolen land of Outer Manchuria. See reconnaissance photo above of 1,000 divisions.

    NATO and the West has just two good options here, for Putin should have been removed in 2006 with Litvinenko poisoning. Now the insane Putin can poison the entire world with a nuclear war. Putin needed to go in 2006, for insanity just gets worse and
    worse.

    Either
    (1) give Ukraine drones to knock out electric power in Moscow and beyond
    Or
    (2) give Ukraine NATO membership and tell Russia to clear out in a week or NATO forces go in and clear them out.

    Of course, every day Putin and Russia needs reminding that if he presses nuclear buttons or nuclear bomb on Ukraine that Russia will be a nuclear ash pile before the day is out.

    What should have been done in 2006, unfortunately that delay to 2022. Same can be said of Hitler-- he should have been removed in the early 1930s before his insanity got going.

    AP

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)