"Lee [Smolin] and I discussed these paradoxes at great length for many months, starting in January 2001. We would meet in cafés in South Kensington or Holland Park to mull over the problem. THE ROOT OF ALL THE EVIL WAS CLEARLY SPECIAL RELATIVITY. Allthese paradoxes resulted from well known effects such as length contraction, time dilation, or E=mc^2, all basic predictions of special relativity." Joao Magueijo, Faster Than the Speed of Light, p. 250 http://www.amazon.com/Faster-Than-Speed-Light-
"You want to go back to a notion of space-time that preceded the 20th century, and it wants to ignore the essential lessons about space-time that the 20th century has taught us." Joao Magueijo: "Yes, that's right. So it's nouveau-Newtonian." https://pirsa.org/16060116?t=3211
Joao Magueijo, Niayesh Afshordi, Stephon Alexander: "So we have broken fundamentally this Lorentz invariance which equates space and time...It is the other postulate of relativity, that of constancy of c, that has to give way." https://youtu.be/kbHBBtsrU1g?t=1431
The "root of all the evil" in physics is Einstein's 1905 constant-speed-of-light falsehood.
Pentcho Valev <pva...@yahoo.com> wrote:
In devising his theory of special relativity, Einstein abandoned the particle model of light implying variable speed of light as per Newton, and "borrowed" from the ether theory a continuous-field model of light implying constant speed of light:It doesn't matter at this point in time what Einstein thought about
while developing his theories as the finished product has been confirmed innumerable times by innumerable experiments crackpot.
That you are unable to understand the dual nature of light is your
problem crackpot.
In devising his theory of special relativity, Einstein abandoned the particle model of light implying variable speed of light as per Newton, and "borrowed" from the ether theory a continuous-field model of light implying constant speed of light:
On 2/21/2023 3:51 PM, The Starmaker wrote:ALL THE EVIL WAS CLEARLY SPECIAL RELATIVITY. All these paradoxes resulted from well known effects such as length contraction, time dilation, or E=mc^2, all basic predictions of special relativity." Joao Magueijo, Faster Than the Speed of Light, p.
whodat wrote:
On 2/21/2023 12:20 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
whodat wrote:
On 2/21/2023 12:57 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
whodat wrote:
On 2/20/2023 10:44 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
Pentcho Valev wrote:
"Lee [Smolin] and I discussed these paradoxes at great length for many months, starting in January 2001. We would meet in cafés in South Kensington or Holland Park to mull over the problem. THE ROOT OF
without it. In this regard, telling the truth is suicidal:
"You want to go back to a notion of space-time that preceded the 20th century, and it wants to ignore the essential lessons about space-time that the 20th century has taught us." Joao Magueijo: "Yes, that's right. So it's nouveau-Newtonian."
Joao Magueijo, Niayesh Afshordi, Stephon Alexander: "So we have broken fundamentally this Lorentz invariance which equates space and time...It is the other postulate of relativity, that of constancy of c, that has to give way."
The "root of all the evil" in physics is Einstein's 1905 constant-speed-of-light falsehood. Physicists know that, start telling the truth sometimes, but then stop halfway. Modern physics is predicated on the falsehood and would collapse
is embedded in all of modern physics and to propose a varying speed of light (VSL) is worse than swearing! It is like proposing a language without vowels."
"...Dr. Magueijo said. "We need to drop a postulate, perhaps the constancy of the speed of light." http://www.nytimes.com/2002/12/31/science/e-and-mc2
"He opened by explaining how Einstein's theory of relativity is the foundation of every other theory in modern physics and that the assumption that the speed of light is constant is the foundation of that theory. Thus a constant speed of light
speed of light without wrecking the whole thing too much."
"The whole of physics is predicated on the constancy of the speed of light," Joao Magueijo, a cosmologist at Imperial College London and pioneer of the theory of variable light speed, told Motherboard. "So we had to find ways to change the
Back of the classroom cutup once again. Where are your brains?
See more here: https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev
Pentcho Valev
There is no vacum so there is no speed of light contancy.
Vacums do not exist.
You're right, but vacuum does.
Where is the vacuum?
Back of the classroom cutup once again. Where are your brains?
I get it, you don't know what a vacuum is either.
Here is the definition of "vacuum":
a space entirely devoid of matter.
synonyms: empty space, emptiness, void, nothingness, vacuity, vacancy, >>> voidness, nihility
https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=define+vacuum >>>
Now, show me where is this 'space entirely devoid of matter' located at? >>
Learn how to say "I don't know."
Are you being silly, or stupid, or both. I know but I refuse to
play your silly stupid little game. And that's all you're about
here in the sci newsgroups.
whodat wrote:RELATIVITY. All these paradoxes resulted from well known effects such as length contraction, time dilation, or E=mc^2, all basic predictions of special relativity." Joao Magueijo, Faster Than the Speed of Light, p. 250
On 2/21/2023 12:57 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
whodat wrote:
On 2/20/2023 10:44 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
Pentcho Valev wrote:
"Lee [Smolin] and I discussed these paradoxes at great length for many months, starting in January 2001. We would meet in cafés in South Kensington or Holland Park to mull over the problem. THE ROOT OF ALL THE EVIL WAS CLEARLY SPECIAL
it. In this regard, telling the truth is suicidal:
"You want to go back to a notion of space-time that preceded the 20th century, and it wants to ignore the essential lessons about space-time that the 20th century has taught us." Joao Magueijo: "Yes, that's right. So it's nouveau-Newtonian."
Joao Magueijo, Niayesh Afshordi, Stephon Alexander: "So we have broken fundamentally this Lorentz invariance which equates space and time...It is the other postulate of relativity, that of constancy of c, that has to give way."
The "root of all the evil" in physics is Einstein's 1905 constant-speed-of-light falsehood. Physicists know that, start telling the truth sometimes, but then stop halfway. Modern physics is predicated on the falsehood and would collapse without
is embedded in all of modern physics and to propose a varying speed of light (VSL) is worse than swearing! It is like proposing a language without vowels."
"...Dr. Magueijo said. "We need to drop a postulate, perhaps the constancy of the speed of light." http://www.nytimes.com/2002/12/31/science/e-and-mc2-e
"He opened by explaining how Einstein's theory of relativity is the foundation of every other theory in modern physics and that the assumption that the speed of light is constant is the foundation of that theory. Thus a constant speed of light
of light without wrecking the whole thing too much."
"The whole of physics is predicated on the constancy of the speed of light," Joao Magueijo, a cosmologist at Imperial College London and pioneer of the theory of variable light speed, told Motherboard. "So we had to find ways to change the speed
See more here: https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev
Pentcho Valev
There is no vacum so there is no speed of light contancy.
Vacums do not exist.
You're right, but vacuum does.
Where is the vacuum?
Back of the classroom cutup once again. Where are your brains?
I get it, you don't know what a vacuum is either.
Here is the definition of "vacuum":
a space entirely devoid of matter.
synonyms: empty space, emptiness, void, nothingness, vacuity, vacancy, voidness, nihility
https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=define+vacuum
Now, show me where is this 'space entirely devoid of matter' located at?
"Lee [Smolin] and I discussed these paradoxes at great length for many months, starting in January 2001. We would meet in cafés in South Kensington or Holland Park to mull over the problem. THE ROOT OF ALL THE EVIL WAS CLEARLY SPECIAL RELATIVITY. Allthese paradoxes resulted from well known effects such as length contraction, time dilation, or E=mc^2, all basic predictions of special relativity." Joao Magueijo, Faster Than the Speed of Light, p. 250 http://www.amazon.com/Faster-Than-Speed-Light-
"You want to go back to a notion of space-time that preceded the 20th century, and it wants to ignore the essential lessons about space-time that the 20th century has taught us." Joao Magueijo: "Yes, that's right. So it's nouveau-Newtonian." https://pirsa.org/16060116?t=3211
Joao Magueijo, Niayesh Afshordi, Stephon Alexander: "So we have broken fundamentally this Lorentz invariance which equates space and time...It is the other postulate of relativity, that of constancy of c, that has to give way." https://youtu.be/kbHBBtsrU1g?t=1431
The "root of all the evil" in physics is Einstein's 1905 constant-speed-of-light falsehood. Physicists know that, start telling the truth sometimes, but then stop halfway. Modern physics is predicated on the falsehood and would collapse without it. Inthis regard, telling the truth is suicidal:
"...Dr. Magueijo said. "We need to drop a postulate, perhaps the constancy of the speed of light." http://www.nytimes.com/2002/12/31/science/e-and-mc2-equality-it-seems-is-relative.htmlembedded in all of modern physics and to propose a varying speed of light (VSL) is worse than swearing! It is like proposing a language without vowels." http://www.thegreatdebate.org.uk/VSLRevPrnt.html
"He opened by explaining how Einstein's theory of relativity is the foundation of every other theory in modern physics and that the assumption that the speed of light is constant is the foundation of that theory. Thus a constant speed of light is
"The whole of physics is predicated on the constancy of the speed of light," Joao Magueijo, a cosmologist at Imperial College London and pioneer of the theory of variable light speed, told Motherboard. "So we had to find ways to change the speed oflight without wrecking the whole thing too much." https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/8q87gk/light-speed-slowed
See more here: https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev
Pentcho Valev
The Starmaker wrote:SPECIAL RELATIVITY. All these paradoxes resulted from well known effects such as length contraction, time dilation, or E=mc^2, all basic predictions of special relativity." Joao Magueijo, Faster Than the Speed of Light, p. 250
whodat wrote:
On 2/21/2023 12:57 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
whodat wrote:
On 2/20/2023 10:44 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
Pentcho Valev wrote:
"Lee [Smolin] and I discussed these paradoxes at great length for many months, starting in January 2001. We would meet in cafés in South Kensington or Holland Park to mull over the problem. THE ROOT OF ALL THE EVIL WAS CLEARLY
it. In this regard, telling the truth is suicidal:
"You want to go back to a notion of space-time that preceded the 20th century, and it wants to ignore the essential lessons about space-time that the 20th century has taught us." Joao Magueijo: "Yes, that's right. So it's nouveau-Newtonian."
Joao Magueijo, Niayesh Afshordi, Stephon Alexander: "So we have broken fundamentally this Lorentz invariance which equates space and time...It is the other postulate of relativity, that of constancy of c, that has to give way."
The "root of all the evil" in physics is Einstein's 1905 constant-speed-of-light falsehood. Physicists know that, start telling the truth sometimes, but then stop halfway. Modern physics is predicated on the falsehood and would collapse without
embedded in all of modern physics and to propose a varying speed of light (VSL) is worse than swearing! It is like proposing a language without vowels."
"...Dr. Magueijo said. "We need to drop a postulate, perhaps the constancy of the speed of light." http://www.nytimes.com/2002/12/31/science/e-and-mc2-e
"He opened by explaining how Einstein's theory of relativity is the foundation of every other theory in modern physics and that the assumption that the speed of light is constant is the foundation of that theory. Thus a constant speed of light is
of light without wrecking the whole thing too much."
"The whole of physics is predicated on the constancy of the speed of light," Joao Magueijo, a cosmologist at Imperial College London and pioneer of the theory of variable light speed, told Motherboard. "So we had to find ways to change the speed
See more here: https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev
Pentcho Valev
There is no vacum so there is no speed of light contancy.
Vacums do not exist.
You're right, but vacuum does.
Where is the vacuum?
Back of the classroom cutup once again. Where are your brains?
I get it, you don't know what a vacuum is either.
Here is the definition of "vacuum":
a space entirely devoid of matter.
synonyms: empty space, emptiness, void, nothingness, vacuity, vacancy,
voidness, nihility
https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=define+vacuum
Now, show me where is this 'space entirely devoid of matter' located at?
In other words, Albert Einstein's claim about the speed of light..'in a vacuum' is a ...fake.
Just another of Albert Einstein's fake science.
whodat wrote:Holland Park to mull over the problem. THE ROOT OF ALL THE EVIL WAS CLEARLY SPECIAL RELATIVITY. All these paradoxes resulted from well known effects such as length contraction, time dilation, or E=mc^2, all basic predictions of special relativity." Joao
On 2/21/2023 3:51 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
whodat wrote:
On 2/21/2023 12:20 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
whodat wrote:
On 2/21/2023 12:57 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
whodat wrote:
On 2/20/2023 10:44 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
Pentcho Valev wrote:
"Lee [Smolin] and I discussed these paradoxes at great length for many months, starting in January 2001. We would meet in cafés in South Kensington or
without it. In this regard, telling the truth is suicidal:
"You want to go back to a notion of space-time that preceded the 20th century, and it wants to ignore the essential lessons about space-time that the 20th century has taught us." Joao Magueijo: "Yes, that's right. So it's nouveau-Newtonian."
Joao Magueijo, Niayesh Afshordi, Stephon Alexander: "So we have broken fundamentally this Lorentz invariance which equates space and time...It is the other postulate of relativity, that of constancy of c, that has to give way."
The "root of all the evil" in physics is Einstein's 1905 constant-speed-of-light falsehood. Physicists know that, start telling the truth sometimes, but then stop halfway. Modern physics is predicated on the falsehood and would collapse
is embedded in all of modern physics and to propose a varying speed of light (VSL) is worse than swearing! It is like proposing a language without vowels."
"...Dr. Magueijo said. "We need to drop a postulate, perhaps the constancy of the speed of light." http://www.nytimes.com/2002/12/31/science/e-and-mc2
"He opened by explaining how Einstein's theory of relativity is the foundation of every other theory in modern physics and that the assumption that the speed of light is constant is the foundation of that theory. Thus a constant speed of light
speed of light without wrecking the whole thing too much."
"The whole of physics is predicated on the constancy of the speed of light," Joao Magueijo, a cosmologist at Imperial College London and pioneer of the theory of variable light speed, told Motherboard. "So we had to find ways to change the
Back of the classroom cutup once again. Where are your brains?
See more here: https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev
Pentcho Valev
There is no vacum so there is no speed of light contancy.
Vacums do not exist.
You're right, but vacuum does.
Where is the vacuum?
Back of the classroom cutup once again. Where are your brains?
I get it, you don't know what a vacuum is either.
Here is the definition of "vacuum":
a space entirely devoid of matter.
synonyms: empty space, emptiness, void, nothingness, vacuity, vacancy, >>>>> voidness, nihility
https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=define+vacuum >>>>>
Now, show me where is this 'space entirely devoid of matter' located at? >>>>
Learn how to say "I don't know."
Are you being silly, or stupid, or both. I know but I refuse to
play your silly stupid little game. And that's all you're about
here in the sci newsgroups.
The fact is, you made the claim that 'vacuum exist'.
But have not shown
that in fact it exist.
The fact is, 'no one on earth can produce such a space that is
completely empty of matter.'
you don't walk the walk, you don't even talk it.
On 2/21/2023 11:03 PM, The Starmaker wrote:or Holland Park to mull over the problem. THE ROOT OF ALL THE EVIL WAS CLEARLY SPECIAL RELATIVITY. All these paradoxes resulted from well known effects such as length contraction, time dilation, or E=mc^2, all basic predictions of special relativit
whodat wrote:
On 2/21/2023 3:51 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
whodat wrote:
On 2/21/2023 12:20 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
whodat wrote:
On 2/21/2023 12:57 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
whodat wrote:
On 2/20/2023 10:44 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
Pentcho Valev wrote:
"Lee [Smolin] and I discussed these paradoxes at great length for many months, starting in January 2001. We would meet in cafés in South Kensington
without it. In this regard, telling the truth is suicidal:
"You want to go back to a notion of space-time that preceded the 20th century, and it wants to ignore the essential lessons about space-time that the 20th century has taught us." Joao Magueijo: "Yes, that's right. So it's nouveau-Newtonian."
Joao Magueijo, Niayesh Afshordi, Stephon Alexander: "So we have broken fundamentally this Lorentz invariance which equates space and time...It is the other postulate of relativity, that of constancy of c, that has to give way."
The "root of all the evil" in physics is Einstein's 1905 constant-speed-of-light falsehood. Physicists know that, start telling the truth sometimes, but then stop halfway. Modern physics is predicated on the falsehood and would collapse
light is embedded in all of modern physics and to propose a varying speed of light (VSL) is worse than swearing! It is like proposing a language without vowels."
"...Dr. Magueijo said. "We need to drop a postulate, perhaps the constancy of the speed of light." http://www.nytimes.com/2002/12/31/science/e-and-m
"He opened by explaining how Einstein's theory of relativity is the foundation of every other theory in modern physics and that the assumption that the speed of light is constant is the foundation of that theory. Thus a constant speed of
speed of light without wrecking the whole thing too much."
"The whole of physics is predicated on the constancy of the speed of light," Joao Magueijo, a cosmologist at Imperial College London and pioneer of the theory of variable light speed, told Motherboard. "So we had to find ways to change the
See more here: https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev
Pentcho Valev
There is no vacum so there is no speed of light contancy.
Vacums do not exist.
You're right, but vacuum does.
Where is the vacuum?
Back of the classroom cutup once again. Where are your brains?
I get it, you don't know what a vacuum is either.
Here is the definition of "vacuum":
a space entirely devoid of matter.
synonyms: empty space, emptiness, void, nothingness, vacuity, vacancy, >>>>> voidness, nihility
https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=define+vacuum >>>>>
Now, show me where is this 'space entirely devoid of matter' located at?
Back of the classroom cutup once again. Where are your brains?
Learn how to say "I don't know."
Are you being silly, or stupid, or both. I know but I refuse to
play your silly stupid little game. And that's all you're about
here in the sci newsgroups.
The fact is, you made the claim that 'vacuum exist'.
I never made any claims, I merely corrected your spelling.
But have not shown
that in fact it exist.
The fact is, 'no one on earth can produce such a space that is
completely empty of matter.'
you don't walk the walk, you don't even talk it.
You're not smart enough to understand that there are no absolutes
in science, so you play these silly stupid little games hopeful
that someone will bite. When nobody does, you make believe they
have as you do above. Get over yourself already.
On Monday, February 20, 2023 at 2:16:09 PM UTC-8, Jim Pennino wrote:
Pentcho Valev <pva...@yahoo.com> wrote:
In devising his theory of special relativity, Einstein abandoned the particle model of light implying variable speed of light as per Newton, and "borrowed" from the ether theory a continuous-field model of light implying constant speed of light:It doesn't matter at this point in time what Einstein thought about
while developing his theories as the finished product has been confirmed
innumerable times by innumerable experiments crackpot.
That you are unable to understand the dual nature of light is your
problem crackpot.
Einstein didn't need relativity. He had an alternative that had no contradictions.
He called it closing velocity theory. Everything has its own motion and
obeys the speed limit. Motion can converge and diverge on its self
each of two sides obeying the universe's speed limit.
Pentcho Valev <pva...@yahoo.com> wrote:
In devising his theory of special relativity, Einstein abandoned the particle model of light implying variable speed of light as per Newton, and "borrowed" from the ether theory a continuous-field model of light implying constant speed of light:It doesn't matter at this point in time what Einstein thought about
while developing his theories as the finished product has been confirmed innumerable times by innumerable experiments crackpot.
That you are unable to understand the dual nature of light is your
problem crackpot.
On Monday, February 20, 2023 at 2:16:09 PM UTC-8, Jim Pennino wrote:
Pentcho Valev <pva...@yahoo.com> wrote:
In devising his theory of special relativity, Einstein abandoned the particle model of light implying variable speed of light as per Newton, and "borrowed" from the ether theory a continuous-field model of light implying constant speed of light:It doesn't matter at this point in time what Einstein thought about
while developing his theories as the finished product has been confirmed
innumerable times by innumerable experiments crackpot.
That you are unable to understand the dual nature of light is your
problem crackpot.
Uh, er, that is because it is fundamentally incomprehensible, moron--in principle.
Why do you keep responding when you obviously don't have a clue about any of this.
James McGinn / Delusionally Insane Crackpot
whodat wrote:™Ãƒâ€ ’‚©s in South Kensington or Holland Park to mull over the problem. THE ROOT OF ALL THE EVIL WAS CLEARLY SPECIAL RELATIVITY. All these paradoxes resulted from well
On 2/21/2023 11:03 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
whodat wrote:
On 2/21/2023 3:51 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
whodat wrote:
On 2/21/2023 12:20 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
whodat wrote:
On 2/21/2023 12:57 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
whodat wrote:
On 2/20/2023 10:44 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
Pentcho Valev wrote:
"Lee [Smolin] and I discussed these paradoxes at great length for many months, starting in January 2001. We would meet in cafÃÆ’Æ’ÃÆâ€
without it. In this regard, telling the truth is suicidal:
"You want to go back to a notion of space-time that preceded the 20th century, and it wants to ignore the essential lessons about space-time that the 20th century has taught us." Joao Magueijo: "Yes, that's right. So it's nouveau-Newtonian."
Joao Magueijo, Niayesh Afshordi, Stephon Alexander: "So we have broken fundamentally this Lorentz invariance which equates space and time...It is the other postulate of relativity, that of constancy of c, that has to give way."
The "root of all the evil" in physics is Einstein's 1905 constant-speed-of-light falsehood. Physicists know that, start telling the truth sometimes, but then stop halfway. Modern physics is predicated on the falsehood and would collapse
light is embedded in all of modern physics and to propose a varying speed of light (VSL) is worse than swearing! It is like proposing a language without vowels."
"...Dr. Magueijo said. "We need to drop a postulate, perhaps the constancy of the speed of light." http://www.nytimes.com/2002/12/31/science/e-and-m
"He opened by explaining how Einstein's theory of relativity is the foundation of every other theory in modern physics and that the assumption that the speed of light is constant is the foundation of that theory. Thus a constant speed of
speed of light without wrecking the whole thing too much."
"The whole of physics is predicated on the constancy of the speed of light," Joao Magueijo, a cosmologist at Imperial College London and pioneer of the theory of variable light speed, told Motherboard. "So we had to find ways to change the
See more here: https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev
Pentcho Valev
There is no vacum so there is no speed of light contancy. >>>>>>>>>>>
Vacums do not exist.
You're right, but vacuum does.
Where is the vacuum?
Back of the classroom cutup once again. Where are your brains?
I get it, you don't know what a vacuum is either.
Here is the definition of "vacuum":
a space entirely devoid of matter.
synonyms: empty space, emptiness, void, nothingness, vacuity, vacancy, >>>>>>> voidness, nihility
https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=define+vacuum >>>>>>>
Now, show me where is this 'space entirely devoid of matter' located at?
Back of the classroom cutup once again. Where are your brains?
Learn how to say "I don't know."
Are you being silly, or stupid, or both. I know but I refuse to
play your silly stupid little game. And that's all you're about
here in the sci newsgroups.
The fact is, you made the claim that 'vacuum exist'.
I never made any claims, I merely corrected your spelling.
You wrote: "You're right, but vacuum does."
so you have a short memory too?
But have not shown
that in fact it exist.
The fact is, 'no one on earth can produce such a space that is
completely empty of matter.'
On 2/22/2023 2:14 AM, The Starmaker wrote:’ƒâ€šÃ‚©s in South Kensington or Holland Park to mull over the problem. THE ROOT OF ALL THE EVIL WAS CLEARLY SPECIAL RELATIVITY. All these paradoxes resulted from
whodat wrote:
On 2/21/2023 11:03 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
whodat wrote:
On 2/21/2023 3:51 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
whodat wrote:
On 2/21/2023 12:20 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
whodat wrote:
On 2/21/2023 12:57 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
whodat wrote:
On 2/20/2023 10:44 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
Pentcho Valev wrote:
"Lee [Smolin] and I discussed these paradoxes at great length for many months, starting in January 2001. We would meet in cafÃÆ’ÃÆ
"
"You want to go back to a notion of space-time that preceded the 20th century, and it wants to ignore the essential lessons about space-time that the 20th century has taught us." Joao Magueijo: "Yes, that's right. So it's nouveau-Newtonian.
without it. In this regard, telling the truth is suicidal:
Joao Magueijo, Niayesh Afshordi, Stephon Alexander: "So we have broken fundamentally this Lorentz invariance which equates space and time...It is the other postulate of relativity, that of constancy of c, that has to give way."
The "root of all the evil" in physics is Einstein's 1905 constant-speed-of-light falsehood. Physicists know that, start telling the truth sometimes, but then stop halfway. Modern physics is predicated on the falsehood and would collapse
light is embedded in all of modern physics and to propose a varying speed of light (VSL) is worse than swearing! It is like proposing a language without vowels."
"...Dr. Magueijo said. "We need to drop a postulate, perhaps the constancy of the speed of light." http://www.nytimes.com/2002/12/31/science/e-and
"He opened by explaining how Einstein's theory of relativity is the foundation of every other theory in modern physics and that the assumption that the speed of light is constant is the foundation of that theory. Thus a constant speed of
speed of light without wrecking the whole thing too much."
"The whole of physics is predicated on the constancy of the speed of light," Joao Magueijo, a cosmologist at Imperial College London and pioneer of the theory of variable light speed, told Motherboard. "So we had to find ways to change the
I get it, you don't know what a vacuum is either.
See more here: https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev
Pentcho Valev
There is no vacum so there is no speed of light contancy. >>>>>>>>>>>
Vacums do not exist.
You're right, but vacuum does.
Where is the vacuum?
Back of the classroom cutup once again. Where are your brains? >>>>>>>
Here is the definition of "vacuum":
a space entirely devoid of matter.
synonyms: empty space, emptiness, void, nothingness, vacuity, vacancy,
voidness, nihility
https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=define+vacuum
Now, show me where is this 'space entirely devoid of matter' located at?
Back of the classroom cutup once again. Where are your brains?
Learn how to say "I don't know."
Are you being silly, or stupid, or both. I know but I refuse to
play your silly stupid little game. And that's all you're about
here in the sci newsgroups.
The fact is, you made the claim that 'vacuum exist'.
I never made any claims, I merely corrected your spelling.
You wrote: "You're right, but vacuum does."
so you have a short memory too?
Apparently things I don't consider worthy of arguing you do. I was
actually addressing the existence of a valid word, but you took that
to mean the represented entity. Let's proceed from there.
Just to point out how stupid you are, how large does a vacuum have to
be in order to exist? Given the essential that size doesn't matter,
where it comes to proving whether or not something exists, prove to the readership of this newsgroup that a vacuum (sub-sub-quark size) does not exist.
Be careful of a logical trap:
"Proving a negative or negative proof may refer to: ... Sometimes
it is mistaken for an argument from ignorance, which is non-proof
and a logical fallacy"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proving_a_negative
I will be pleasantly surprised if you don't step into a logical trap.
There are a lot of readers and lurkers hopeful that you will.
You're welcome to pursue this while I reassure you and anyone following
this thread that I only claimed the word "vacuum" exists. That has not changed but you're welcome to hoist yourself by your own petard, you
do it so well to the merriment of many.
But have not shown
that in fact it exist.
My claim was correct, the word "vacuum" is legitimate and it does
exist. "Vacum" is not a legitimate word thus for all practical
purposes does not exist.
whodat wrote:’ƒâ€ ’ÃÆ’‚ÃÃâ€
On 2/22/2023 2:14 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
whodat wrote:
On 2/21/2023 11:03 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
whodat wrote:
On 2/21/2023 3:51 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
whodat wrote:
On 2/21/2023 12:20 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
whodat wrote:
On 2/21/2023 12:57 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
whodat wrote:
On 2/20/2023 10:44 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
Pentcho Valev wrote:
"Lee [Smolin] and I discussed these paradoxes at great length for many months, starting in January 2001. We would meet in cafÃÆ’ÃÆ
"
"You want to go back to a notion of space-time that preceded the 20th century, and it wants to ignore the essential lessons about space-time that the 20th century has taught us." Joao Magueijo: "Yes, that's right. So it's nouveau-Newtonian.
without it. In this regard, telling the truth is suicidal:
Joao Magueijo, Niayesh Afshordi, Stephon Alexander: "So we have broken fundamentally this Lorentz invariance which equates space and time...It is the other postulate of relativity, that of constancy of c, that has to give way."
The "root of all the evil" in physics is Einstein's 1905 constant-speed-of-light falsehood. Physicists know that, start telling the truth sometimes, but then stop halfway. Modern physics is predicated on the falsehood and would collapse
light is embedded in all of modern physics and to propose a varying speed of light (VSL) is worse than swearing! It is like proposing a language without vowels."
"...Dr. Magueijo said. "We need to drop a postulate, perhaps the constancy of the speed of light." http://www.nytimes.com/2002/12/31/science/e-and
"He opened by explaining how Einstein's theory of relativity is the foundation of every other theory in modern physics and that the assumption that the speed of light is constant is the foundation of that theory. Thus a constant speed of
speed of light without wrecking the whole thing too much."
"The whole of physics is predicated on the constancy of the speed of light," Joao Magueijo, a cosmologist at Imperial College London and pioneer of the theory of variable light speed, told Motherboard. "So we had to find ways to change the
I get it, you don't know what a vacuum is either.
See more here: https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev
Pentcho Valev
There is no vacum so there is no speed of light contancy. >>>>>>>>>>>>>
Vacums do not exist.
You're right, but vacuum does.
Where is the vacuum?
Back of the classroom cutup once again. Where are your brains? >>>>>>>>>
Here is the definition of "vacuum":
a space entirely devoid of matter.
synonyms: empty space, emptiness, void, nothingness, vacuity, vacancy,
voidness, nihility
https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=define+vacuum
Now, show me where is this 'space entirely devoid of matter' located at?
Back of the classroom cutup once again. Where are your brains?
Learn how to say "I don't know."
Are you being silly, or stupid, or both. I know but I refuse to
play your silly stupid little game. And that's all you're about
here in the sci newsgroups.
The fact is, you made the claim that 'vacuum exist'.
I never made any claims, I merely corrected your spelling.
You wrote: "You're right, but vacuum does."
so you have a short memory too?
Apparently things I don't consider worthy of arguing you do. I was
actually addressing the existence of a valid word, but you took that
to mean the represented entity. Let's proceed from there.
Just to point out how stupid you are, how large does a vacuum have to
be in order to exist? Given the essential that size doesn't matter,
where it comes to proving whether or not something exists, prove to the
readership of this newsgroup that a vacuum (sub-sub-quark size) does not
exist.
Be careful of a logical trap:
"Proving a negative or negative proof may refer to: ... Sometimes
it is mistaken for an argument from ignorance, which is non-proof
and a logical fallacy"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proving_a_negative
I will be pleasantly surprised if you don't step into a logical trap.
There are a lot of readers and lurkers hopeful that you will.
You're welcome to pursue this while I reassure you and anyone following
this thread that I only claimed the word "vacuum" exists. That has not
changed but you're welcome to hoist yourself by your own petard, you
do it so well to the merriment of many.
But have not shown
that in fact it exist.
My claim was correct, the word "vacuum" is legitimate and it does
exist. "Vacum" is not a legitimate word thus for all practical
purposes does not exist.
So, let me get this straight... "vacuum" is a real word... but the
meaning of the word doesn't exist???
whodat wrote:
But have not shown
that in fact it exist.
My claim was correct, the word "vacuum" is legitimate and it does
exist. "Vacum" is not a legitimate word thus for all practical
purposes does not exist.
So, let me get this straight... "vacuum" is a real word... but the
meaning of the word doesn't exist???
On 2/22/2023 6:14 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
whodat wrote:
But have not shown
that in fact it exist.
My claim was correct, the word "vacuum" is legitimate and it does
exist. "Vacum" is not a legitimate word thus for all practical
purposes does not exist.
So, let me get this straight... "vacuum" is a real word... but the
meaning of the word doesn't exist???
The word "unicorn" exists.
Unicorns don't exist.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 300 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 110:10:42 |
| Calls: | 6,701 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 12,233 |
| Messages: | 5,348,551 |