It is obvious that the particle model of light is incompatible with VARIABLE wavelength of light. Unfortunately for cosmologists, the wave model is incompatible as well:
It is obvious that the particle model of light is incompatible with VARIABLE wavelength of light. Unfortunately for cosmologists, the wave model is incompatible as well:the wavelength at which they are emitted (the gravitational field of the galaxy will not be large enough to have a significant effect). Suppose now that the source starts moving toward us. When the source emits the next wave crest it will be nearer to us,
Stephen Hawking, "A Brief History of Time", Chapter 3: "Now imagine a source of light at a constant distance from us, such as a star, emitting waves of light at a constant wavelength. Obviously the wavelength of the waves we receive will be the same as
This interpretation implies that the emitter is CHASING the emitted crest - that is the reason why, when the next crest is emitted, the distance between the two crests is smaller than when the emitter is stationary:spaceship - so he would know his spaceship's speed without looking outside. If, for instance, measurements inside the spaceship show that the wavelength has decreased, the emitter will conclude that his spaceship is now moving faster than before.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3mJTRXCMU6o&t=77s
As chasing becomes faster and faster, the distance between crests approaches zero - the emitted crests remain in the vicinity of the emitter for a long time. Preposterous, isn't it?
The variation of the wavelength of light with the speed of the emitter is absurd not only intuitively. It is incompatible with the principle of relativity. If the wavelength varied, the emitter could regularly measure the variations inside his
For light waves, there can be no chasing. No matter how fast the emitter is moving, the speed of the emitted crest relative to the emitter remains constant, c. Accordingly, when the next crest is emitted, the distance between the two crests remainsunchanged - the same as when the emitter is stationary.
The wavelength of light depends only on the nature of the emitting substance and is constant otherwise.
More here: https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev
Pentcho Valev
Cosmologists fiercely marginalize dissenters and then come up with the argument that there is no alternative better than the Big Bang nonsense:cosmologists.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bqtFlKQO2FQ
Generally, there can be no serious alternative at all. A person working hard to feed his/her children, outside the domain of cosmology, cannot create anything comparable to the huge edifice built and constantly repaired by thousands of professional
See more: https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev
Pentcho Valev
Cosmologists fiercely marginalize dissenters and then come up with the argument that there is no alternative better than the Big Bang nonsense:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bqtFlKQO2FQcosmologists.
Generally, there can be no serious alternative at all. A person working hard to feed his/her children, outside the domain of cosmology, cannot create anything comparable to the huge edifice built and constantly repaired by thousands of professional
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 300 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 101:06:23 |
Calls: | 6,700 |
Files: | 12,232 |
Messages: | 5,349,831 |