XPost: sci.physics.relativity

The Starmaker wrote:

worm food wrote:

On 2/14/2023 2:51 PM, The Starmaker wrote:

George Hammond wrote:

On Sunday, February 12, 2023 at 1:30:01 PM UTC-5, worm food wrote:

[George Hammond wrote]: – it has been scientifically proven >>>> and measured to 2 decimal point accuracy experimentally – that >>>> THERE IS A REAL GOD – and it is exactly the God described in the
King James Bible and described in all 5 of the world's major religions!
.

[worm food wrote]:
George, you should really reach out to Hans Geesink
(https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Hans-Geesink). I believe you and >>> he may have a lot to talk about.

[George Hammond MS Physics]
Dear "worm food", on the OUTSIDE chance
that you might be a serious person –
.
I have the following questions for you: –
.
1 – Why are there no other SPR postings under the
name "worm food" – have you deliberately nymshifted
for this specific post?
.
You seem to have read my post of 1/1/23 since
you quoted the entire message in your post?
.
2 – Therefore, what would make you think that I have
ANYTHING in common with Dr. Geesink – since his work
is entirely about :
.
QUANTUM THEORY and ELECTROMAGNETIC THEORY
.
while my work is all about :
.
RELATIVITY and PSYCHOMETRY
.
THERE SEEMS TO BE NO SCIENTIFIC
COMMON GROUND WHATSOEVER ?
.
Truly yours, George

Objectivism is ...antiquated.

Your proof of God
needs to be added
to that pile
of
burning books of history.

Couldn't you come up with something new????

maybe a better mousetrap.

throw yourself on dat fire..

food for fire.

I see Loki is out here doing [god's] work.

I see you reference 'god' twice in one sentence....dats odd?

Actually, your reference to 'god' is...thrice.


[god's]
Loki
and...

"I see..."


The all seeing god.


Now, it's dat odd?


I mean

Is dat odd? dat you would mentioned 'god' thrice in one sentence??

I mean, is dat odd?



I mean, ...Yes,


dat is Odd.


I mean
if others
are wondering
is dat odd?

The answer is
Yes...
That is Odd.
















--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
the unchallengeable.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: sci.physics.relativity

George Hammond wrote:

On Friday, February 17, 2023 at 1:28:23 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote:

[GEORGE HAMMOND] WROTE:
do you know some
influential JEWS who might know some
high-ranking Jewish ACADEMICS ??

[STARMAKER] WROTE:
Their God is different...they worship a
god who is...6 inches tall.

[GEORGE HAMMOND] wrote:
Here is a list of the top half dozen
........ISRAELI UNIVERSITIES: –
1 – Technion-Israel Institute of Technology – Haifa
2 – University of Haifa
3 – Hebrew University of Jerusalem
4 – Weizmann Institute of Science – Tel Aviv
5 – Tel Aviv University
6 – Bar Ilan University – Tel Aviv
.
These Christian Physicists on SPR don't know
what God is!
.
I need to talk to some JEWISH PHYSICISTS
who know BOTH what Physics is, and God is !
.
All of these universities teach in ENGLISH as well
as HEBREW.
.
If anyone reading this post besides Dum-Dum
STARMAKER knows any "Jewish Physicists"
who might understand both PHYSICS and GOD
please let them know about this discovery
of the world's first scientific proof of God
(relativistic metric of God) – and the fact
that GEORGE HAMMOND is desperately
looking for them !
.
George

A JEWISH PHYSICISTS who knows BOTH what Physics is, and God is...doesn't exist. ...and they certaintly don't want to have anything to
do with scientists who aren't Jewish.

And they will simply steal your idea and call it their own.

Don't you know their history since the beginning? They are vampires.





--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
the unchallengeable.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: sci.physics.relativity

The Starmaker wrote:

The Starmaker wrote:

worm food wrote:

On 2/14/2023 2:51 PM, The Starmaker wrote:

George Hammond wrote:

On Sunday, February 12, 2023 at 1:30:01 PM UTC-5, worm food wrote: >>>> [George Hammond wrote]: – it has been scientifically proven >>>> and measured to 2 decimal point accuracy experimentally – that

THERE IS A REAL GOD – and it is exactly the God described in the
King James Bible and described in all 5 of the world's major religions!
.

[worm food wrote]:
George, you should really reach out to Hans Geesink
(https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Hans-Geesink). I believe you and
he may have a lot to talk about.

[George Hammond MS Physics]
Dear "worm food", on the OUTSIDE chance
that you might be a serious person –
.
I have the following questions for you: –
.
1 – Why are there no other SPR postings under the
name "worm food" – have you deliberately nymshifted
for this specific post?
.
You seem to have read my post of 1/1/23 since
you quoted the entire message in your post?
.
2 – Therefore, what would make you think that I have
ANYTHING in common with Dr. Geesink – since his work
is entirely about :
.
QUANTUM THEORY and ELECTROMAGNETIC THEORY
.
while my work is all about :
.
RELATIVITY and PSYCHOMETRY
.
THERE SEEMS TO BE NO SCIENTIFIC
COMMON GROUND WHATSOEVER ?
.
Truly yours, George

Objectivism is ...antiquated.

Your proof of God
needs to be added
to that pile
of
burning books of history.

Couldn't you come up with something new????

maybe a better mousetrap.

throw yourself on dat fire..

food for fire.

I see Loki is out here doing [god's] work.

I see you reference 'god' twice in one sentence....dats odd?

Actually, your reference to 'god' is...thrice.

[god's]
Loki
and...

"I see..."

The all seeing god.

Now, it's dat odd?

I mean

Is dat odd? dat you would mentioned 'god' thrice in one sentence??

I mean, is dat odd?

I mean, ...Yes,

dat is Odd.

I mean
if others
are wondering
is dat odd?

The answer is
Yes...
That is Odd.

Worm food and odd bodkin are one and the same person.


the odd bodkin is back.


or at least tryin to slime back...



but he cannot burn his ...fingerprints.






--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
the unchallengeable.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: sci.physics.relativity

On 2/18/2023 12:11 AM, The Starmaker wrote:

George Hammond wrote:

On Friday, February 17, 2023 at 1:28:23 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote:

[GEORGE HAMMOND] WROTE:
do you know some
influential JEWS who might know some
high-ranking Jewish ACADEMICS ??

[STARMAKER] WROTE:
Their God is different...they worship a
god who is...6 inches tall.

[GEORGE HAMMOND] wrote:
Here is a list of the top half dozen
........ISRAELI UNIVERSITIES: –
1 – Technion-Israel Institute of Technology – Haifa
2 – University of Haifa
3 – Hebrew University of Jerusalem
4 – Weizmann Institute of Science – Tel Aviv
5 – Tel Aviv University
6 – Bar Ilan University – Tel Aviv
.
These Christian Physicists on SPR don't know
what God is!
.
I need to talk to some JEWISH PHYSICISTS
who know BOTH what Physics is, and God is !
.
All of these universities teach in ENGLISH as well
as HEBREW.
.
If anyone reading this post besides Dum-Dum
STARMAKER knows any "Jewish Physicists"
who might understand both PHYSICS and GOD
please let them know about this discovery
of the world's first scientific proof of God
(relativistic metric of God) – and the fact
that GEORGE HAMMOND is desperately
looking for them !
.
George

A JEWISH PHYSICISTS who knows BOTH what Physics is, and God is...doesn't exist.
...and they certaintly don't want to have anything to
do with scientists who aren't Jewish.

And they will simply steal your idea and call it their own.

Don't you know their history since the beginning? They are vampires.

Haven't you ever wondered why nobody has ever considered stealing
any of your ideas? Luck has nothing to do with it.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: sci.physics.relativity

worm food wrote:

On 2/17/2023 1:50 PM, The Starmaker wrote:

worm food wrote:

On 2/15/2023 5:40 AM, George Hammond wrote:

On Tuesday, February 14, 2023 at 11:55:21 AM UTC-5, worm food wrote:

[worm food] wrote:
You, and he, (Hans Geesink) and others, have
clearly "seen something" and you are utilizing
what you consider the best and most relevant
known language to describe that "something".
-wf

.
(hmm... Notice the perfect typographical
"justification" of that paragraph... g.e.h.)
.
[George E Hammond MS Physics]
HISTORIC discoveries can be
described in a few words.
Hammond's Scientific Proof of God
is a HISTORIC discovery.
.
ROUTINE scientific research discoveries
requires dozens of pages. of explanation.
Hans Geesink's QM/EM/BIO discoveries
require voluminous description.
.
The SPOG can be understood by a High
School student – assuming that he:
WANTS TO UNDERSTAND IT !
.
Frankly, I'm more interested in YOUR
opinion of the SPOG then I am in
Hans Geesink's opinion.
.
That is, assuming you are actually
CURIOUS as to what "God" actually is!
BECAUSE if you are actually interested
in what God is – that would make you
the 2nd most interested person in the
world; – after ME !
.
George

George,
I cannot comment on the mathematical accuracy of your theory, nor on the >> scientific rigor. I can only comment that I believe you are earnest.
-wf

yeahhh, when you say the word "earnest"...you make it sound like an
insult! (which is your M.O.)

Text-based communication media are particularly interesting because, in
the absence of context (and sometimes in spite of it), one can impose
one's own psychoemotional context onto the words.

"psychoemotional"???? is dat a compliment? or just your ...M.O.?

But, I can see what you mean about my communication style. Perhaps I
should retrain the algorithm.

Thanks for the tip, Loki.

Anyway, you're both correct. To my thinking, the concept of "god" cannot
be understood without experiencing a change in "magnification". It's
akin to the idea that causality actually doesn't break down at any
level, despite the protestations of several generations of scientists.
Our ignorance of the cause of a phenomenon is simply that: ignorance. Objectivism tends to break down in the face of this realization, due not least in part to our seemingly ingrained reductionist tendencies. In
short, not one of us knows anything about anything.

I know everthing about everything, go ahead..ask me any question on...Relativity.

--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
the unchallengeable.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: sci.physics.relativity

On 2/17/2023 1:50 PM, The Starmaker wrote:

worm food wrote:

On 2/15/2023 5:40 AM, George Hammond wrote:

On Tuesday, February 14, 2023 at 11:55:21 AM UTC-5, worm food wrote:

[worm food] wrote:
You, and he, (Hans Geesink) and others, have
clearly "seen something" and you are utilizing
what you consider the best and most relevant
known language to describe that "something".
-wf

.
(hmm... Notice the perfect typographical
"justification" of that paragraph... g.e.h.)
.
[George E Hammond MS Physics]
HISTORIC discoveries can be
described in a few words.
Hammond's Scientific Proof of God
is a HISTORIC discovery.
.
ROUTINE scientific research discoveries
requires dozens of pages. of explanation.
Hans Geesink's QM/EM/BIO discoveries
require voluminous description.
.
The SPOG can be understood by a High
School student – assuming that he:
WANTS TO UNDERSTAND IT !
.
Frankly, I'm more interested in YOUR
opinion of the SPOG then I am in
Hans Geesink's opinion.
.
That is, assuming you are actually
CURIOUS as to what "God" actually is!
BECAUSE if you are actually interested
in what God is – that would make you
the 2nd most interested person in the
world; – after ME !
.
George

George,
I cannot comment on the mathematical accuracy of your theory, nor on the
scientific rigor. I can only comment that I believe you are earnest.
-wf

yeahhh, when you say the word "earnest"...you make it sound like an
insult! (which is your M.O.)

Text-based communication media are particularly interesting because, in
the absence of context (and sometimes in spite of it), one can impose
one's own psychoemotional context onto the words.

But, I can see what you mean about my communication style. Perhaps I
should retrain the algorithm.

Thanks for the tip, Loki.

Anyway, you're both correct. To my thinking, the concept of "god" cannot
be understood without experiencing a change in "magnification". It's
akin to the idea that causality actually doesn't break down at any
level, despite the protestations of several generations of scientists.
Our ignorance of the cause of a phenomenon is simply that: ignorance. Objectivism tends to break down in the face of this realization, due not
least in part to our seemingly ingrained reductionist tendencies. In
short, not one of us knows anything about anything.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

HeyYa, would You like to talk just for fun with me ?

+372 56091196

Call, if YES.


Am waiting calls from everyone. Am feeling very bored right now.




On Monday, January 2, 2023 at 1:01:00 AM UTC+2, Doodnath Sarti wrote:

George Hammond wrote:

THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD January 1, 2023 FROM: George E Hammond M̶S̶ p̶h̶y̶s̶i̶c̶s̶ . H̶e̶ s̶a̶i̶d̶ y̶o̶u̶ c̶o̶u̶l̶d̶ s̶i̶m̶p̶l̶y̶ m̶u̶l̶t̶i̶p̶l̶y̶ t̶h̶e̶ s̶p̶a̶c̶e̶ p̶a̶r̶t̶ (X̶Y̶Z̶)
o̶f̶ E̶i̶n̶s̶t̶e̶i̶n̶'s̶ m̶e̶t̶r̶i̶c̶:
.
| 1 o o o. |
| o 1 o o. | = EINSTEIN METRIC | o o 1 o. |
| o o o -1.|

better watch these bad mazafakas. They are going to _pay_their_wives_ for the misery, *_destroying_the_gas_pipeline_* to europe.

15,000 Active-Duty Troops from Poland on the front lines in Ukraine! https://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=263092

Hundreds of American troops are in Ukraine – Lavrov https://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=263077

BREAKING: The World Health Organization Endorses List of Potential Serious Adverse Effects of mRNA Injection: 100% of DEATHVAXâ„¢ Recipients Have Heart Damage
https://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=263083

*_capitalist_west_*, lying corrupt mazafakas, worth _not_even_a_shit_.

Former President of France Admits: Minsk Agreements Were to DECEIVE
Russia; Allow Ukraine to build for war https://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=263053

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: sci.physics.relativity

whodat wrote:

On 2/18/2023 12:11 AM, The Starmaker wrote:

George Hammond wrote:

On Friday, February 17, 2023 at 1:28:23 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote:

[GEORGE HAMMOND] WROTE:
do you know some
influential JEWS who might know some
high-ranking Jewish ACADEMICS ??

[STARMAKER] WROTE:
Their God is different...they worship a
god who is...6 inches tall.

[GEORGE HAMMOND] wrote:
Here is a list of the top half dozen
........ISRAELI UNIVERSITIES: –
1 – Technion-Israel Institute of Technology – Haifa
2 – University of Haifa
3 – Hebrew University of Jerusalem
4 – Weizmann Institute of Science – Tel Aviv
5 – Tel Aviv University
6 – Bar Ilan University – Tel Aviv
.
These Christian Physicists on SPR don't know
what God is!
.
I need to talk to some JEWISH PHYSICISTS
who know BOTH what Physics is, and God is !
.
All of these universities teach in ENGLISH as well
as HEBREW.
.
If anyone reading this post besides Dum-Dum
STARMAKER knows any "Jewish Physicists"
who might understand both PHYSICS and GOD
please let them know about this discovery
of the world's first scientific proof of God
(relativistic metric of God) – and the fact
that GEORGE HAMMOND is desperately
looking for them !
.
George

A JEWISH PHYSICISTS who knows BOTH what Physics is, and God is...doesn't exist.
...and they certaintly don't want to have anything to
do with scientists who aren't Jewish.

And they will simply steal your idea and call it their own.

Don't you know their history since the beginning? They are vampires.

Haven't you ever wondered why nobody has ever considered stealing
any of your ideas? Luck has nothing to do with it.

FDR would not bomb train lines to the concentration camps...

--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
the unchallengeable.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: sci.physics.relativity

On 2/18/2023 2:33 PM, The Starmaker wrote:

whodat wrote:

[...]

Haven't you ever wondered why nobody has ever considered stealing
any of your ideas? Luck has nothing to do with it.

FDR would not bomb train lines to the concentration camps...

Answers, such as you imply here, come very easily when the person
providing doesn't fully understand the question. You're doing such
a nice job of hoisting yourself by your own petard that I don't
feel any need to assist you further.

<https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/petard>

But I'll be only too happy to point out what's happening.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: sci.physics.relativity

On 2/18/2023 2:02 PM, The Starmaker wrote:

[...]

I know everthing about everything, [...]

You think you know at least as much as or perhaps more than
Arindam Banerjee? That begs the question which of you two
has more human failings?

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: sci.physics.relativity

George Hammond wrote:

On Saturday, February 18, 2023 at 2:40:53 PM UTC-5, worm food wrote:

[WORM FOOD] wrote:
To my thinking, the concept of "god"
cannot be understood without experiencing
a change in "magnification".

[GEORGE HAMMOND MS Physics] wrote:
OK-- "Worm Food" --- Go to the Head of the Class !
.
You're EXACTLY CORRECT except that God is a
.
1-- A magnification of the SIZE of the World
.............................AND
2-- A magnification of the SPEED of the World
.
Everything you look at (including notably People)
APPEARS to be
about 20% LARGER and 20% FASTER than they
ACTUALLY ARE !!
.
This is the fundamental phenomenon of "GOD" !
.
And YOU are the first person I've ever run into who
RECOGNIZES it (besides me of course, who has
actually succeeded in scientifically proving it!)!
.
George

What scientifically METHOD did you use to proving it????


i see no methods.






--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
the unchallengeable.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: sci.physics.relativity

George Hammond wrote:

On Friday, February 24, 2023 at 5:08:11 AM UTC-5, George Hammond wrote:

On Saturday, February 18, 2023 at 1:38:43 PM UTC-5, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:

[ Athel Cornish-Bowden] wrote
athel -- biochemist, not a physicist,

[George Hammond MS Physics]
OK Athel- let me give you a 60-sec
lecture on Relativity - and then
you will be a "Relativity Physicist" !
.
As an Oxford Chemistry PhD you know
the PYTHAGOREAN THEOREM --
.
s² = x²+y²+z² (Pythagorean Theorem in 3D)
.
Which can be written as a 3x3 matrix:-
.
| 1 o o |
| o 1 o | = Pythagorean theorem
| o o 1 |
.
Relativity is ALL ABOUT the Pythagorean Theorem
IN 4D where it's called the Einstein Metric-
.
ds² = dx²+dy²+dz²-dt² (Einstein metric)
.
Nevermind the minus sign, it's caused by subtracting
the time it takes light to get from one event to another.
.
This eqn can be written as a 4x4 MATRIX - called the
(world famous) "Einstein metric" -
.
| 1 o o o. |
| o 1 o o. | = EINSTEIN METRIC
| o o 1 o. |
| o o o -1.|
.
OK – Einstein used this metric to deduce his
Gravitational Field Equations which replaced
Newton's simple inverse square law of Gravity.
.
But then a Russian mathematician named Friedmann
proposed that the universe was EXPANDING
and he told Einstein that he could simply
multiply the spatial part of his metric by an
"expansion factor" a=a(t) - and Einstein agreed:
.
ds² = a²(dx²+dy²+dz²)-dt² (Friedmann metric)
.
Or written as a matrix :-
.
|a² o o o. |
|o a² o o. | = FRIEDMANN (FLRW) METRIC
|o o a² o. |
|o o o..-1.|
.
Today this metric is called the FLRW metric
(Friedmann, LeMaitre, Robertson, Walker) metric
and rules all of Astrophysics !
.
.......END 60-sec RELATIVITY LECTURE zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
.....BEGIN 60-sec THEOLOGY LECTURE
.
We want to be as competent as the Jewish Physicists
since they not only know PHYSICS, they also know
what GOD is; since the Jews wrote the Bible !
.... I'm a "Swamp Yankee Protestant" by birth and I
expect you are probably a Wesleyan Methodist
since most Cornish people are.
.
We now propose "Theology Space" as an independent
spacetime. Theology Space is also called (human)
"SUBJECTIVE Spacetime" whereas Astrophysics
spacetime is referred to as "OBJECTIVE space-time".
.
OBJECTIVE spacetime is measured by clocks and rulers.
SUBJECTIVE spacetime is what people actually SEE.
.
Different people see different things – especially if they are
over, versus under, 20 years of age. Children see a much
LARGER and FASTER world than adults do.
.
In fact, we have to multiply what CHILDREN SEE by a
"magnification factor", a=a(t), so that their metric of
SUBJECTIVE spacetime is actually:-
.
ds² = a²(dx²+dy²+dz²) - dt²/a²
.
Or again, written as a matrix:-
.
|a² o o o. |
|o a² o o. | = (HAMMOND) METRIC OF GOD
|o o a² o. |
|ooo-1/a²|
.
Here we see that multiplication by "a" increases the SIZE
of objects for very young people, and dividing the time by
"a" increases the SPEED of objects (less time=more speed).
.
Now I have called this the "METRIC OF GOD" – why is that?
.
And the answer is this – a(t) begins at 3.5 at birth, since an
adult is about 3.5 times as big as a newborn. Likewise, the
"perceptual speed" of an adult is likewise known to be 3.5
times as fast as that of a child (by actual measurement of
the movie "motion picture fusion frequency"), first discovered
and measured by Thomas Edison over 100 years ago.
.
Obviously both these size and speed measurements simply
depends on the person's location on the human growth curve: –
HUMAN GROWTH CURVE: - https://html.scribdassets.com/38jup9thxc6bjcfe/images/8-99f9190673.jpg
.
But why am I calling it "God"? And the answer to that is this – .........NO ONE EVER REACHES FULL GROWTH.
In fact WHO and UNESCO data indicate that the average adult
in the world population is only about 85% fully grown –
some more, some less. In 3rd world countries growth stunting
of 30 and 40% is not uncommon ! And 1/1.85=1.18. IOW the
average adult in the world is SEEING a world that appears
.
================================================
.......18% LARGER AND 18% FASTER than it actually is ! ================================================
.
And this, I'm here to tell you, is the scientific explanation of GOD.
.
Imagine if the world suddenly got 20% larger and 20% faster than
it actually is !
.
This would literally SCARE THE DAYLIGHTS out of people!
.
WELL GUESS WHAT – that is what has actually happened to every
single person on earth, and this phenomenon is called GOD.
.
Okay, so I've explained what I think God is – and obviously the phenomenon exists – but how can I actually PROVE that it is GOD?
.
And for that we need a "60-sec Lecture on Psychometry"
.
End "60-sec THEOLOGY LECTURE" zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
BEGIN the "60-sec PSYCHOMETRY LECTURE"

=======================================
HERE WE GO BACK TO THE BEGINNING of my
40 years of research, which ultimately led to the
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD (SPOG).... Back to
the year 1982.
=======================================
.
I never knew anything about GOD, was never interested in
GOD, and never in my life even thought about it !
.
But in 1982, as a result of driving a cab in Boston, I became
interested in "Human Personality Structure".
... Despite having an advanced degree in PHYSICS -- I totally
gave up looking for a job Physics and I actually launched into
a 20 year, INDEPENDENT, investigation of PSYCHOMETRY !
.
PSYCHOMETRY is the statistical branch of Psychology concerned
mainly with written tests to determine both IQ and Personality.
In many ways it is considered the FLAGSHIP of modern Psychology
.
IQ (intelligence) testing is very old, while Personality testing has been very active for the past 75 years. The Scientific Proof of God (SPOG) centers around Personality testing in the search for the "long-lost" STRUCTURAL MODEL OF PERSONALITY which has been underway
ever since HIPPOCRATES The Father of Medicine said he thought
there was such a thing 2500 years ago. He said Man had 4 personalities caused by 4 Humoral fluids. Turns out he was right about the "4" but he
was wrong about the fluids !
.
With the advent of the desktop computer around 1970, Academic
Psychometry spread worldwide with Psychology researchers writing Personality Tests and analyzing them with desktop computers. The peer–published literature in this field is now so large it would
ENTIRELY FILL A MAJOR LIBRARY!.
.
Computers are used to extract the EIGENVECTORS from the
personality test data (correlation matrices). And it is believed that this multilevel eigenvector structure – is in fact the "long-lost"
HIPPOCRATIC STRUCTURAL MODEL OF PERSONALITY.
.
To sum up all this history – it is now believed that there is an EIGENVECTOR PYRAMID in the data with about 30 diverse
eigenvectors (also referred to as "FACTORS" by psychologists)
at the 1st level (called 1st-order Factors), and about 13-2nd order Factors, 4-3rd Order Factors and finally ONE TOP EIGENVECTOR
referred to as the "GFP" (Gen. factor of Personality, or
Gen. factor of Psychology, if it includes IQ).
.
THE PSYCHOLOGISTS HAVE NO IDEA WHERE these EIGENVECTOR
FACTORS come from in the brain ! But they are SURE they exist in
the DATA !
.
========================================================
ALL THEY KNOW-- is that a worldwide PHD ARMY of psychometrists
using desktop computers in 20 countries, in 20 languages, costing
$100s of millions of dollars, and taking more than 50 YEARS-- has
produced this ENORMOUS well-documented peer-published RESULT. ========================================================
.
AND THAT'S WHEN GEORGE HAMMOND ARRIVED ON THE SCENE
.
BEING A PHYSICIST, it wasn't more than a few years before I realized
that the long-lost Structural Model of Personality was probably caused
by the same underlying fact that causes all animals to have FOUR FEET ! Namely the CARTESIAN STRUCTURE OF SPACE
.
I observed THAT THE BRAIN IS CUBICALLY CLEAVED, and I drew this
picture of it with my own hand:--
.
https://html.scribdassets.com/76h12hhjls6bm5q2/images/2-7f6a975f24.jpg ........... ABOVE & BELOW (HAMMOND)--- CUBIC BRAIN https://html.scribdassets.com/6inure6mww8ngndu/images/2-67a3b11050.png
.
Not only is the brain cubically cleaved, I showed in a 1994 peer-reviewed paper that Prof. Jeffrey A Gray's well-known SHS (Septo-Hippocampal System) actually controls his 2 of the cubic-diagonal Personality Eigenvectors. And more recently I've concluded that Gray's SHS actually mediates ALL-13 of the
2nd-Order Personality Eigenvectors-- and THAT ACTUALLY CONSTITUTES the LONG-LOST HIPPOCRATIC STRUCTURAL MODEL OF PERSONALITY!
.
These 13 (cubic) 2nd order eigenvector "Personality Types", I have concluded
are none other than the fabled "12 Olympian Gods" of antiquity !
.
And this brings us to the well known 4-3rd Order eigenvectors, and it is easy
to identify them as the LEGENDARY 4 Gospel personalities:-- Mt, Mk, Lk and Jn.
.
That leaves us facing the now WIDELY TOUTED single 4th-order eigenvector mentioned above; the "GFP" (Gen. factor of psychology).
.... And having determined that the 2nd Orders are the "gods" And the 3rd Orders
are the 4 gospel Saints:-- it is not hard to conclude that
.............. The GFP IS THE GOD OF THE BIBLE !!
.
===================================================================
THUS WE HAVE DISCOVERED THE WORLD'S FIRST SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD
we have discovered that the GOD METRIC mentioned in the "Theology Lecture" above, is now actually experimentally proven to be "God" ! ===================================================================
.
Okay Athel, I'll wrap it up here since this post is getting too long !
.
You come from Cornwall which is a peninsula in the Southwest of England.
I come from a peninsula in the eastern part of Massachusetts USA named
Cape Cod.
Although you are a Chemist and I am a Physicist we are both SCIENTISTS.
.
You of course have had a stellar scientific career, and have a familiarity with the elite intellectuals of Oxford University where you graduated.
I on the other hand, it appears, am a middle-class nobody who has ACCIDENTALLY made what appears to be a STELLAR HISTORIC
scientific discovery.
.
I hope that you will not remain blind to the importance of our accidental meeting on sci.physics.relativity and will undertake to consider this accidental meeting PORTENTOUSLY SERIOUS !
.
Regards, George E Hammond MS Physics, Hyannis Massachusetts

[George Hammond MS Physics]
PS:----
I should mention that my credentials in "Psychometry"
should be bolstered by this photo of me with the then
world's leading expert in Psychometry Hans Eysenck
taken at the XXVI International Congress of Psychology
in Montréal in 1996 where we were both invited speakers
at the same podium and to the same audience. (photo
taken by Prof. Peter F Merenda Chairman of the
Psychology department at URI).
.
https://html.scribdassets.com/icjqusczk4alsap/images/1-c1c01b1d46.jpg
.
.... And also, I personally explain in this 10 minute
YouTube video the relevant findings of the field of
Psychometry to the Scientific Proof of God.
.
WORLD'S 1st SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD
.........https://youtu.be/GXRA_vrZMYk
................(YouTube 12-min)
.
George

Your mistake is :................(YouTube 12-min)

I mean, it should not be there. It's a turn off. In a tiktock world the
view is less than a minute. dropoff view even less than that.

Don't even put one minute.


I mean, who do you know that can listen to you talk for 12 minutes????
YOU GO OUT OF YOUR FUCKIN MIND!!!!


How about a Devil metric? kids Love it!

Fuck God! Nobody gives a fuck about God. Only stupid people believe in
God.


...and they don't even read the bible!













--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
the unchallengeable.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: sci.physics.relativity

ibid.


On 2/25/2023 2:55 PM, The Starmaker wrote:

George Hammond wrote:

On Friday, February 24, 2023 at 5:08:11 AM UTC-5, George Hammond wrote:

On Saturday, February 18, 2023 at 1:38:43 PM UTC-5, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:

[ Athel Cornish-Bowden] wrote
athel -- biochemist, not a physicist,

[George Hammond MS Physics]
OK Athel- let me give you a 60-sec
lecture on Relativity - and then
you will be a "Relativity Physicist" !
.
As an Oxford Chemistry PhD you know
the PYTHAGOREAN THEOREM --
.
s² = x²+y²+z² (Pythagorean Theorem in 3D)
.
Which can be written as a 3x3 matrix:-
.
| 1 o o |
| o 1 o | = Pythagorean theorem
| o o 1 |
.
Relativity is ALL ABOUT the Pythagorean Theorem
IN 4D where it's called the Einstein Metric-
.
ds² = dx²+dy²+dz²-dt² (Einstein metric)
.
Nevermind the minus sign, it's caused by subtracting
the time it takes light to get from one event to another.
.
This eqn can be written as a 4x4 MATRIX - called the
(world famous) "Einstein metric" -
.
| 1 o o o. |
| o 1 o o. | = EINSTEIN METRIC
| o o 1 o. |
| o o o -1.|
.
OK – Einstein used this metric to deduce his
Gravitational Field Equations which replaced
Newton's simple inverse square law of Gravity.
.
But then a Russian mathematician named Friedmann
proposed that the universe was EXPANDING
and he told Einstein that he could simply
multiply the spatial part of his metric by an
"expansion factor" a=a(t) - and Einstein agreed:
.
ds² = a²(dx²+dy²+dz²)-dt² (Friedmann metric)
.
Or written as a matrix :-
.
|a² o o o. |
|o a² o o. | = FRIEDMANN (FLRW) METRIC
|o o a² o. |
|o o o..-1.|
.
Today this metric is called the FLRW metric
(Friedmann, LeMaitre, Robertson, Walker) metric
and rules all of Astrophysics !
.
.......END 60-sec RELATIVITY LECTURE
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
.....BEGIN 60-sec THEOLOGY LECTURE
.
We want to be as competent as the Jewish Physicists
since they not only know PHYSICS, they also know
what GOD is; since the Jews wrote the Bible !
.... I'm a "Swamp Yankee Protestant" by birth and I
expect you are probably a Wesleyan Methodist
since most Cornish people are.
.
We now propose "Theology Space" as an independent
spacetime. Theology Space is also called (human)
"SUBJECTIVE Spacetime" whereas Astrophysics
spacetime is referred to as "OBJECTIVE space-time".
.
OBJECTIVE spacetime is measured by clocks and rulers.
SUBJECTIVE spacetime is what people actually SEE.
.
Different people see different things – especially if they are
over, versus under, 20 years of age. Children see a much
LARGER and FASTER world than adults do.
.
In fact, we have to multiply what CHILDREN SEE by a
"magnification factor", a=a(t), so that their metric of
SUBJECTIVE spacetime is actually:-
.
ds² = a²(dx²+dy²+dz²) - dt²/a²
.
Or again, written as a matrix:-
.
|a² o o o. |
|o a² o o. | = (HAMMOND) METRIC OF GOD
|o o a² o. |
|ooo-1/a²|
.
Here we see that multiplication by "a" increases the SIZE
of objects for very young people, and dividing the time by
"a" increases the SPEED of objects (less time=more speed).
.
Now I have called this the "METRIC OF GOD" – why is that?
.
And the answer is this – a(t) begins at 3.5 at birth, since an
adult is about 3.5 times as big as a newborn. Likewise, the
"perceptual speed" of an adult is likewise known to be 3.5
times as fast as that of a child (by actual measurement of
the movie "motion picture fusion frequency"), first discovered
and measured by Thomas Edison over 100 years ago.
.
Obviously both these size and speed measurements simply
depends on the person's location on the human growth curve: –
HUMAN GROWTH CURVE: -
https://html.scribdassets.com/38jup9thxc6bjcfe/images/8-99f9190673.jpg
.
But why am I calling it "God"? And the answer to that is this –
.........NO ONE EVER REACHES FULL GROWTH.
In fact WHO and UNESCO data indicate that the average adult
in the world population is only about 85% fully grown –
some more, some less. In 3rd world countries growth stunting
of 30 and 40% is not uncommon ! And 1/1.85=1.18. IOW the
average adult in the world is SEEING a world that appears
.
================================================
.......18% LARGER AND 18% FASTER than it actually is !
================================================
.
And this, I'm here to tell you, is the scientific explanation of GOD.
.
Imagine if the world suddenly got 20% larger and 20% faster than
it actually is !
.
This would literally SCARE THE DAYLIGHTS out of people!
.
WELL GUESS WHAT – that is what has actually happened to every
single person on earth, and this phenomenon is called GOD.
.
Okay, so I've explained what I think God is – and obviously the
phenomenon exists – but how can I actually PROVE that it is GOD?
.
And for that we need a "60-sec Lecture on Psychometry"
.
End "60-sec THEOLOGY LECTURE"
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
BEGIN the "60-sec PSYCHOMETRY LECTURE"

=======================================
HERE WE GO BACK TO THE BEGINNING of my
40 years of research, which ultimately led to the
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD (SPOG).... Back to
the year 1982.
=======================================
.
I never knew anything about GOD, was never interested in
GOD, and never in my life even thought about it !
.
But in 1982, as a result of driving a cab in Boston, I became
interested in "Human Personality Structure".
... Despite having an advanced degree in PHYSICS -- I totally
gave up looking for a job Physics and I actually launched into
a 20 year, INDEPENDENT, investigation of PSYCHOMETRY !
.
PSYCHOMETRY is the statistical branch of Psychology concerned
mainly with written tests to determine both IQ and Personality.
In many ways it is considered the FLAGSHIP of modern Psychology
.
IQ (intelligence) testing is very old, while Personality testing has been >>> very active for the past 75 years. The Scientific Proof of God (SPOG)
centers around Personality testing in the search for the "long-lost"
STRUCTURAL MODEL OF PERSONALITY which has been underway
ever since HIPPOCRATES The Father of Medicine said he thought
there was such a thing 2500 years ago. He said Man had 4 personalities
caused by 4 Humoral fluids. Turns out he was right about the "4" but he
was wrong about the fluids !
.
With the advent of the desktop computer around 1970, Academic
Psychometry spread worldwide with Psychology researchers writing
Personality Tests and analyzing them with desktop computers. The
peer–published literature in this field is now so large it would
ENTIRELY FILL A MAJOR LIBRARY!.
.
Computers are used to extract the EIGENVECTORS from the
personality test data (correlation matrices). And it is believed that this >>> multilevel eigenvector structure – is in fact the "long-lost"
HIPPOCRATIC STRUCTURAL MODEL OF PERSONALITY.
.
To sum up all this history – it is now believed that there is an
EIGENVECTOR PYRAMID in the data with about 30 diverse
eigenvectors (also referred to as "FACTORS" by psychologists)
at the 1st level (called 1st-order Factors), and about 13-2nd order
Factors, 4-3rd Order Factors and finally ONE TOP EIGENVECTOR
referred to as the "GFP" (Gen. factor of Personality, or
Gen. factor of Psychology, if it includes IQ).
.
THE PSYCHOLOGISTS HAVE NO IDEA WHERE these EIGENVECTOR
FACTORS come from in the brain ! But they are SURE they exist in
the DATA !
.
========================================================
ALL THEY KNOW-- is that a worldwide PHD ARMY of psychometrists
using desktop computers in 20 countries, in 20 languages, costing
$100s of millions of dollars, and taking more than 50 YEARS-- has
produced this ENORMOUS well-documented peer-published RESULT.
========================================================
.
AND THAT'S WHEN GEORGE HAMMOND ARRIVED ON THE SCENE
.
BEING A PHYSICIST, it wasn't more than a few years before I realized
that the long-lost Structural Model of Personality was probably caused
by the same underlying fact that causes all animals to have FOUR FEET !
Namely the CARTESIAN STRUCTURE OF SPACE
.
I observed THAT THE BRAIN IS CUBICALLY CLEAVED, and I drew this
picture of it with my own hand:--
.
https://html.scribdassets.com/76h12hhjls6bm5q2/images/2-7f6a975f24.jpg
........... ABOVE & BELOW (HAMMOND)--- CUBIC BRAIN
https://html.scribdassets.com/6inure6mww8ngndu/images/2-67a3b11050.png
.
Not only is the brain cubically cleaved, I showed in a 1994 peer-reviewed >>> paper that Prof. Jeffrey A Gray's well-known SHS (Septo-Hippocampal System) >>> actually controls his 2 of the cubic-diagonal Personality Eigenvectors. And >>> more recently I've concluded that Gray's SHS actually mediates ALL-13 of the
2nd-Order Personality Eigenvectors-- and THAT ACTUALLY CONSTITUTES the
LONG-LOST HIPPOCRATIC STRUCTURAL MODEL OF PERSONALITY!
.
These 13 (cubic) 2nd order eigenvector "Personality Types", I have concluded
are none other than the fabled "12 Olympian Gods" of antiquity !
.
And this brings us to the well known 4-3rd Order eigenvectors, and it is easy
to identify them as the LEGENDARY 4 Gospel personalities:-- Mt, Mk, Lk and Jn.
.
That leaves us facing the now WIDELY TOUTED single 4th-order eigenvector >>> mentioned above; the "GFP" (Gen. factor of psychology).
.... And having determined that the 2nd Orders are the "gods" And the 3rd Orders
are the 4 gospel Saints:-- it is not hard to conclude that
.............. The GFP IS THE GOD OF THE BIBLE !!
.
===================================================================
THUS WE HAVE DISCOVERED THE WORLD'S FIRST SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD
we have discovered that the GOD METRIC mentioned in the "Theology Lecture" >>> above, is now actually experimentally proven to be "God" !
===================================================================
.
Okay Athel, I'll wrap it up here since this post is getting too long !
.
You come from Cornwall which is a peninsula in the Southwest of England. >>> I come from a peninsula in the eastern part of Massachusetts USA named
Cape Cod.
Although you are a Chemist and I am a Physicist we are both SCIENTISTS.
.
You of course have had a stellar scientific career, and have a familiarity >>> with the elite intellectuals of Oxford University where you graduated.
I on the other hand, it appears, am a middle-class nobody who has
ACCIDENTALLY made what appears to be a STELLAR HISTORIC
scientific discovery.
.
I hope that you will not remain blind to the importance of our accidental >>> meeting on sci.physics.relativity and will undertake to consider this
accidental meeting PORTENTOUSLY SERIOUS !
.
Regards, George E Hammond MS Physics, Hyannis Massachusetts

[George Hammond MS Physics]
PS:----
I should mention that my credentials in "Psychometry"
should be bolstered by this photo of me with the then
world's leading expert in Psychometry Hans Eysenck
taken at the XXVI International Congress of Psychology
in Montréal in 1996 where we were both invited speakers
at the same podium and to the same audience. (photo
taken by Prof. Peter F Merenda Chairman of the
Psychology department at URI).
.
https://html.scribdassets.com/icjqusczk4alsap/images/1-c1c01b1d46.jpg
.
.... And also, I personally explain in this 10 minute
YouTube video the relevant findings of the field of
Psychometry to the Scientific Proof of God.
.
WORLD'S 1st SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD
.........https://youtu.be/GXRA_vrZMYk
................(YouTube 12-min)
.
George

Your mistake is :................(YouTube 12-min)

I mean, it should not be there. It's a turn off. In a tiktock world the
view is less than a minute. dropoff view even less than that.

Don't even put one minute.

I mean, who do you know that can listen to you talk for 12 minutes????
YOU GO OUT OF YOUR FUCKIN MIND!!!!

How about a Devil metric? kids Love it!

Fuck God! Nobody gives a fuck about God. Only stupid people believe in
God.

...and they don't even read the bible!

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: sci.physics.relativity

George Hammond wrote:

On Friday, March 3, 2023 at 4:54:07 PM UTC-5, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:

< [Jeffrey Rubard] wrote:

"I guess you guys sure like any kind of sophistry."

[George E Hammond MS Physics]
Hi Jeffrey – welcome to SPR – good luck with
trying to get anyone's attention ! Everyone is
too busy trying to prove EINSTEIN WRONG !
.
"SOPHISTRY" ? – – Forget it –
PLAIN STUPIDITY is the PROBLEM !
.
This is the simplest
SCIENTIFIC EXPLANATION OF GOD
ever discovered – and they can't understand it!
.
PS – Google may "trim" the following and replace it
with a series of dots "[...]" – if so, just CLICK on the
"..." dots , and it will re-appear !
.
[George E. Hammond MS Physics]
.
The Einstein metric is written:
...... ds² = dx²+dy²+dz²-dt²
or a matrix:
.
| 1 o o o. |
| o 1 o o. | = EINSTEIN METRIC
| o o 1 o. |
| o o o -1.|
.
But suppose we use a "SLOW CLOCK"
and suppose we use a "SHORT RULER"
.
Slow and short by the same
multiplication factor "a"
.
A slow clock causes things to measure "less seconds"
A short ruler causes things to measure "more inches"
.
So now the Einstein metric becomes: –
...... ds² = a²(dx²+dy²+dz²) - dt²/a²
or as a matrix: –
.
|a² o o o. |
|o a² o o. | = THE (HAMMOND) GOD METRIC
|o o a² o. |
|ooo-1/a²|
.
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
BUT – WHY DO I CALL IT THE "GOD METRIC" ? zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
.
And the answer is this: – HUMANS under the age of 20
are examples of "a slow clock with a short ruler" !
.
The "Foot" is the standard (English) unit of measure.
An adult foot is 3.5 times as large as a newborn's foot!
.
Not only that – the perceptual speed of an adult is
likewise 3.5 times as fast as a newborn child. This was
first discovered by THOMAS EDISON 100 years ago.
...The first thing he found was the minimum film speed
16 frames/sec for adults and increase linearly, under 20,
just like intelligence, and for the same reason, as
evidenced by the fact that intelligence has to be divided
by age under 20 to obtain IQ!
.
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
So therefore – CHILDREN are an example of an "observer"
using a SLOW CLOCK and a SHORT RULER ! zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
.
And FINALLY we know that NO ONE ever reaches FULL GROWTH,
in fact WHO, UNESCO etc. found the average adult in the world
population is only about 85% fully grown. And since (1/.85=1.18) ,
we see that the average adult person in the world is: –
.
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
SEEING A WORLD THAT IS 18% LARGER AND FASTER
THAN IT ACTUALLY IS – & THIS PHENOMENON
......................... IS KNOWN AS "GOD" zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
.
For more details you can read the following 2 SPR posts: –
RE---THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics.relativity/c/EsKCSUHMmow/m/nCL2yjYbAAAJ
AND https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics.relativity/c/EsKCSUHMmow/m/-yhYw3QeAAAJ

QED: – THERE IS A REAL GOD !
(Someone tell Richard Dawkins)
.
George Hammond MS Physics, Hyannis MA

Let me explain something to you...

Mathematical Proof of God means...there is no proof of God because you are using math to prove it and math does not exist.

There is no physical proof of God, only numbers on a matchbook cover.

The 'scientific community' whenever they don't have physical proof...they conjure up mathematical proof.


Like for example "dark energy". No physical proof that it exist but lots of mathematical proof.

Math is not science...math doesn't even exist!


So, of course you have mathematical proof of God since math and God don't exist.


Can you prove math exist? Where does it exist?...only in the Mind.


Billions of earth-like planets out there...Where is the second one? Doesn't exist. It's only a math trick.











--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
the unchallengeable.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Saturday, March 4, 2023 at 12:56:52 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote:

George Hammond wrote:

On Friday, March 3, 2023 at 4:54:07 PM UTC-5, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:

< [Jeffrey Rubard] wrote:

"I guess you guys sure like any kind of sophistry."

[George E Hammond MS Physics]
Hi Jeffrey – welcome to SPR – good luck with
trying to get anyone's attention ! Everyone is
too busy trying to prove EINSTEIN WRONG !
.
"SOPHISTRY" ? – – Forget it –
PLAIN STUPIDITY is the PROBLEM !
.
This is the simplest
SCIENTIFIC EXPLANATION OF GOD
ever discovered – and they can't understand it!
.
PS – Google may "trim" the following and replace it
with a series of dots "[...]" – if so, just CLICK on the
"..." dots , and it will re-appear !
.
[George E. Hammond MS Physics]
.
The Einstein metric is written:
...... ds² = dx²+dy²+dz²-dt²
or a matrix:
.
| 1 o o o. |
| o 1 o o. | = EINSTEIN METRIC
| o o 1 o. |
| o o o -1.|
.
But suppose we use a "SLOW CLOCK"
and suppose we use a "SHORT RULER"
.
Slow and short by the same
multiplication factor "a"
.
A slow clock causes things to measure "less seconds"
A short ruler causes things to measure "more inches"
.
So now the Einstein metric becomes: –
...... ds² = a²(dx²+dy²+dz²) - dt²/a²
or as a matrix: –
.
|a² o o o. |
|o a² o o. | = THE (HAMMOND) GOD METRIC
|o o a² o. |
|ooo-1/a²|
.
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
BUT – WHY DO I CALL IT THE "GOD METRIC" ? zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
.
And the answer is this: – HUMANS under the age of 20
are examples of "a slow clock with a short ruler" !
.
The "Foot" is the standard (English) unit of measure.
An adult foot is 3.5 times as large as a newborn's foot!
.
Not only that – the perceptual speed of an adult is
likewise 3.5 times as fast as a newborn child. This was
first discovered by THOMAS EDISON 100 years ago.
...The first thing he found was the minimum film speed
16 frames/sec for adults and increase linearly, under 20,
just like intelligence, and for the same reason, as
evidenced by the fact that intelligence has to be divided
by age under 20 to obtain IQ!
.
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
So therefore – CHILDREN are an example of an "observer"
using a SLOW CLOCK and a SHORT RULER ! zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
.
And FINALLY we know that NO ONE ever reaches FULL GROWTH,
in fact WHO, UNESCO etc. found the average adult in the world
population is only about 85% fully grown. And since (1/.85=1.18) ,
we see that the average adult person in the world is: –
.
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
SEEING A WORLD THAT IS 18% LARGER AND FASTER
THAN IT ACTUALLY IS – & THIS PHENOMENON
......................... IS KNOWN AS "GOD" zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
.
For more details you can read the following 2 SPR posts: –
RE---THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics.relativity/c/EsKCSUHMmow/m/nCL2yjYbAAAJ
AND https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics.relativity/c/EsKCSUHMmow/m/-yhYw3QeAAAJ

QED: – THERE IS A REAL GOD !
(Someone tell Richard Dawkins)
.
George Hammond MS Physics, Hyannis MA

Let me explain something to you...

Mathematical Proof of God means...there is no proof of God because you are using math to prove it and math does not exist.

There is no physical proof of God, only numbers on a matchbook cover.

The 'scientific community' whenever they don't have physical proof...they conjure up mathematical proof.

Like for example "dark energy". No physical proof that it exist but lots of mathematical proof.

Math is not science...math doesn't even exist!

So, of course you have mathematical proof of God since math and God don't exist.

Can you prove math exist? Where does it exist?...only in the Mind.

"You're a mathematical intuitionist, are you?"

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: sci.physics.relativity

George Hammond wrote:

On Saturday, March 4, 2023 at 3:56:49 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote:

George Hammond wrote:

On Friday, March 3, 2023 at 4:54:07 PM UTC-5, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:

< [Jeffrey Rubard] wrote:

"I guess you guys sure like any kind of sophistry."

[George E Hammond MS Physics]
Hi Jeffrey – welcome to SPR – good luck with
trying to get anyone's attention ! Everyone is
too busy trying to prove EINSTEIN WRONG !
.
"SOPHISTRY" ? – – Forget it –
PLAIN STUPIDITY is the PROBLEM !
.
This is the simplest
SCIENTIFIC EXPLANATION OF GOD
ever discovered – and they can't understand it!
.
PS – Google may "trim" the following and replace it
with a series of dots "[...]" – if so, just CLICK on the
"..." dots , and it will re-appear !
.
[George E. Hammond MS Physics]
.
The Einstein metric is written:
...... ds² = dx²+dy²+dz²-dt²
or a matrix:
.
| 1 o o o. |
| o 1 o o. | = EINSTEIN METRIC
| o o 1 o. |
| o o o -1.|
.
But suppose we use a "SLOW CLOCK"
and suppose we use a "SHORT RULER"
.
Slow and short by the same
multiplication factor "a"
.
A slow clock causes things to measure "less seconds"
A short ruler causes things to measure "more inches"
.
So now the Einstein metric becomes: –
...... ds² = a²(dx²+dy²+dz²) - dt²/a²
or as a matrix: –
.
|a² o o o. |
|o a² o o. | = THE (HAMMOND) GOD METRIC
|o o a² o. |
|ooo-1/a²|
.
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
BUT – WHY DO I CALL IT THE "GOD METRIC" ? zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
.
And the answer is this: – HUMANS under the age of 20
are examples of "a slow clock with a short ruler" !
.
The "Foot" is the standard (English) unit of measure.
An adult foot is 3.5 times as large as a newborn's foot!
.
Not only that – the perceptual speed of an adult is
likewise 3.5 times as fast as a newborn child. This was
first discovered by THOMAS EDISON 100 years ago.
...The first thing he found was the minimum film speed
16 frames/sec for adults and increase linearly, under 20,
just like intelligence, and for the same reason, as
evidenced by the fact that intelligence has to be divided
by age under 20 to obtain IQ!
.
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
So therefore – CHILDREN are an example of an "observer"
using a SLOW CLOCK and a SHORT RULER ! zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
.
And FINALLY we know that NO ONE ever reaches FULL GROWTH,
in fact WHO, UNESCO etc. found the average adult in the world
population is only about 85% fully grown. And since (1/.85=1.18) ,
we see that the average adult person in the world is: –
.
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
SEEING A WORLD THAT IS 18% LARGER AND FASTER
THAN IT ACTUALLY IS – & THIS PHENOMENON
......................... IS KNOWN AS "GOD" zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
.
For more details you can read the following 2 SPR posts: –
RE---THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics.relativity/c/EsKCSUHMmow/m/nCL2yjYbAAAJ
AND https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics.relativity/c/EsKCSUHMmow/m/-yhYw3QeAAAJ

QED: – THERE IS A REAL GOD !
(Someone tell Richard Dawkins)
.
George Hammond MS Physics, Hyannis MA

[STARMAKER] wrote:
Let me explain something to you...

[George E Hammond MS Physics]
Let me tell you something
STARMAKER: –
.
I studied the problem 8 hours a day
7 days a week for 40 years. (I'm 81) !
.
The minimum wage in Massachusetts
is $15 per hour.
.
40*365*8*15 = $1.75 MILLION DOLLARS
.
That's what it cost ME to discover the
World's 1st Scientific Proof Of God (SPOG)
.
But that's nothing compared to $500 million
it cost ACADEMIC RESEARCH PSYCHOLOGY
over 50 years worldwide to Discover the "GFP"
(Gen. factor of Psychology) which is in fact
(Hammond has proved) THE GOD OF THE BIBLE.
They don't know what it is, – but Hammond does !
.
That's not a "math" result – it's an "EXPERIMENTAL l"
result ! By thousands of research scientists worldwide!
sitting in a peer reviewed literature large enough to
fill a 10 story library !
.
As a physicist, I have simply expressed their
EXPERIMENTAL RESULT in mathematical terms: –
(because I'm a Relativity Physicist).
.
|a² o o o. |
|o a² o o. | = HAMMOND METRIC OF GOD
|o o a² o. |
|ooo-1/a²|
.
And because of their MONUMENTAL EXPERIMENTAL
RESULT – you can be goddamned sure that it is
EXPERIMENTALLY CORRECT!
.
THERE IS NOW A RIGOROUS SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD
.
(Someone should tell Richard Dawkins,
Or Bill Dembski, for that matter!)
.
George

I looked up Bill Dembski at the Encyclopedia...(he sounds like you)

http://americanloons.blogspot.com/2010/11/103-william-bill-dembski.html

--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
the unchallengeable.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: sci.physics.relativity

Jeffrey Rubard wrote:

On Saturday, March 4, 2023 at 11:12:45 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote:

George Hammond wrote:

On Saturday, March 4, 2023 at 3:56:49 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote:

George Hammond wrote:

On Friday, March 3, 2023 at 4:54:07 PM UTC-5, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:

< [Jeffrey Rubard] wrote:

"I guess you guys sure like any kind of sophistry."

[George E Hammond MS Physics]
Hi Jeffrey – welcome to SPR – good luck with
trying to get anyone's attention ! Everyone is
too busy trying to prove EINSTEIN WRONG !
.
"SOPHISTRY" ? – – Forget it –
PLAIN STUPIDITY is the PROBLEM !
.
This is the simplest
SCIENTIFIC EXPLANATION OF GOD
ever discovered – and they can't understand it!
.
PS – Google may "trim" the following and replace it
with a series of dots "[...]" – if so, just CLICK on the
"..." dots , and it will re-appear !
.
[George E. Hammond MS Physics]
.
The Einstein metric is written:
...... ds² = dx²+dy²+dz²-dt²
or a matrix:
.
| 1 o o o. |
| o 1 o o. | = EINSTEIN METRIC
| o o 1 o. |
| o o o -1.|
.
But suppose we use a "SLOW CLOCK"
and suppose we use a "SHORT RULER"
.
Slow and short by the same
multiplication factor "a"
.
A slow clock causes things to measure "less seconds"
A short ruler causes things to measure "more inches"
.
So now the Einstein metric becomes: –
...... ds² = a²(dx²+dy²+dz²) - dt²/a²
or as a matrix: –
.
|a² o o o. |
|o a² o o. | = THE (HAMMOND) GOD METRIC
|o o a² o. |
|ooo-1/a²|
.
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
BUT – WHY DO I CALL IT THE "GOD METRIC" ? zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
.
And the answer is this: – HUMANS under the age of 20
are examples of "a slow clock with a short ruler" !
.
The "Foot" is the standard (English) unit of measure.
An adult foot is 3.5 times as large as a newborn's foot!
.
Not only that – the perceptual speed of an adult is
likewise 3.5 times as fast as a newborn child. This was
first discovered by THOMAS EDISON 100 years ago.
...The first thing he found was the minimum film speed
16 frames/sec for adults and increase linearly, under 20,
just like intelligence, and for the same reason, as
evidenced by the fact that intelligence has to be divided
by age under 20 to obtain IQ!
.
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
So therefore – CHILDREN are an example of an "observer"
using a SLOW CLOCK and a SHORT RULER ! zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
.
And FINALLY we know that NO ONE ever reaches FULL GROWTH,
in fact WHO, UNESCO etc. found the average adult in the world population is only about 85% fully grown. And since (1/.85=1.18) ,
we see that the average adult person in the world is: –
.
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
SEEING A WORLD THAT IS 18% LARGER AND FASTER
THAN IT ACTUALLY IS – & THIS PHENOMENON
......................... IS KNOWN AS "GOD" zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
.
For more details you can read the following 2 SPR posts: –
RE---THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics.relativity/c/EsKCSUHMmow/m/nCL2yjYbAAAJ
AND https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics.relativity/c/EsKCSUHMmow/m/-yhYw3QeAAAJ

QED: – THERE IS A REAL GOD !
(Someone tell Richard Dawkins)
.
George Hammond MS Physics, Hyannis MA

[STARMAKER] wrote:
Let me explain something to you...

[George E Hammond MS Physics]
Let me tell you something
STARMAKER: –
.
I studied the problem 8 hours a day
7 days a week for 40 years. (I'm 81) !
.
The minimum wage in Massachusetts
is $15 per hour.
.
40*365*8*15 = $1.75 MILLION DOLLARS
.
That's what it cost ME to discover the
World's 1st Scientific Proof Of God (SPOG)
.
But that's nothing compared to $500 million
it cost ACADEMIC RESEARCH PSYCHOLOGY
over 50 years worldwide to Discover the "GFP"
(Gen. factor of Psychology) which is in fact
(Hammond has proved) THE GOD OF THE BIBLE.
They don't know what it is, – but Hammond does !
.
That's not a "math" result – it's an "EXPERIMENTAL l"
result ! By thousands of research scientists worldwide!
sitting in a peer reviewed literature large enough to
fill a 10 story library !
.
As a physicist, I have simply expressed their
EXPERIMENTAL RESULT in mathematical terms: –
(because I'm a Relativity Physicist).
.
|a² o o o. |
|o a² o o. | = HAMMOND METRIC OF GOD
|o o a² o. |
|ooo-1/a²|
.
And because of their MONUMENTAL EXPERIMENTAL
RESULT – you can be goddamned sure that it is
EXPERIMENTALLY CORRECT!
.
THERE IS NOW A RIGOROUS SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD
.
(Someone should tell Richard Dawkins,
Or Bill Dembski, for that matter!)
.
George

I looked up Bill Dembski at the Encyclopedia...(he sounds like you)

http://americanloons.blogspot.com/2010/11/103-william-bill-dembski.html
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
the unchallengeable.

"This is a well-known ruse, right?"

"ruse"???? Where is the ruse? What part is the ruse??


This is called...the real world.


The real world is a ...ruse.

--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
the unchallengeable.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: sci.physics.relativity

George Hammond wrote:

On Sunday, March 5, 2023 at 2:12:45 AM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote:

George Hammond wrote:

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
So therefore – CHILDREN are an example of an "observer"
using a SLOW CLOCK and a SHORT RULER ! zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
.

.

[STARMAKER] wrote:
I looked up Bill Dembski at the Encyclopedia...(he sounds like you)

http://americanloons.blogspot.com/2010/11/103-william-bill-dembski.html
--

[George Hammond MS Physics]
.
Bill Dembski is a lot more educated than me.
He has 2 or 3 PhD's – one in Mathematics !
.
Yet he has been ridiculed and trashed on the
Media a million times more than me !
.
BUT – – WOULD YOU BELIEVE: –
.
IT TURNS OUT THAT MY "GOD METRIC": –
.
|a² o o o. |
|o a² o o. | = HAMMOND METRIC OF GOD
|o o a² o. |
|ooo-1/a²|
.
Actually PROVES that Dembski's
.
INTELLIGENT DESIGN theory
.
is SCIENTIFICALLY CORRECT !
.
If anybody reading this is in a position to
personally contact BILL DEMBSKI, please
let him know that a rigorous scientific proof
of "Intelligent Design" has been found
ACCIDENTALLY by a Massachusetts physicist
named HAMMOND !
.
George

Why don't you simply call him up yourself? Everybody gots a phone in their pocket!

and. btw..did anybody tell you Richard Dawkins wrote a book entitled...THE GOD DELUSION!!!!!






--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
the unchallengeable.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: sci.physics.relativity

George Hammond wrote:

On Monday, March 6, 2023 at 3:10:32 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote:

George Hammond wrote: zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
So therefore – CHILDREN are an example of an "observer"
using a SLOW CLOCK and a SHORT RULER ! zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

IT TURNS OUT THAT MY "GOD METRIC": –
|a² o o o. |
|o a² o o. | = HAMMOND METRIC OF GOD
|o o a² o. |
|ooo-1/a²|

.
(( IS a "SLOW CLOCK-SHORT RULER" – METRIC ))
.
and:

Actually PROVES that Dembski's
INTELLIGENT DESIGN theory
is SCIENTIFICALLY CORRECT !
.
If anybody is in a position to
contact BILL DEMBSKI, please
let him know

[STARMAKER] wrote:
Why don't you simply call him up yourself?
Everybody's got a phone in their pocket!

and. btw..did anybody tell you Richard Dawkins
wrote a book entitled...THE GOD DELUSION!!!!!

[George Hammond MS Physics]
Dembski gets 500 emails, 50 phone calls
and 150 letters EVERY DAY !
.
ARE YOU KIDDING – the only way to get a
message to him is through someone who
KNOWS HIM PERSONALLY !
.
Besides that, Hammond's SPOG proves
Dembski's ID – – but Dembski's ID cannot
prove Hammond's SPOG!
.
RICHARD DAWKINS' "God Delusion" is 15 yrs old !!
.
Bill Dembski is 20 years younger than me
Richard Dawkins is my age (81)!
.
50 years ago, when I was 30 – I did not
believe there was a God. Today at 80
I know better – in fact I've proven there IS !.
.
How Richard Dawkins being a highly educated
and worldly person could get to the age of 65 and
write a book proposing Atheism – is beyond belief ?
.
George

Richard Dawkins never said he was an atheist.


--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
the unchallengeable.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: sci.physics.relativity

George Hammond wrote:

On Tuesday, March 7, 2023 at 1:58:31 AM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote:

George Hammond wrote: zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
So therefore – CHILDREN are an example of an "observer"
using a SLOW CLOCK and a SHORT RULER ! zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
IT TURNS OUT THAT MY "GOD METRIC": –
|a² o o o. |
|o a² o o. | = HAMMOND METRIC OF GOD
|o o a² o. |
|ooo-1/a²|
.
(( IS a "SLOW CLOCK-SHORT RULER" – METRIC ))
.

[STARMAKER] wrote:
Richard Dawkins never said he was an atheist.

[George Hammond MS Physics, Hyannis MA USA]
.
RICHARD DAWKINS said in print: –
.
"A supernatural creator almost certainly does
not exist and religious faith is a delusion—
"a fixed false belief"" (Wikipedia)

A person like Richard Dawkins chooses his words very carefully.

Notice there is the word "almost" before certaintly.



al·most
/'ôlmost/
adverb
not quite; https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=define+almost


That means he said 'not quite certaint'...does not exist.

'not quite'. ALMOST!

.
He says: “ He only believes Scientific Evidence
and there is no scientific evidence for God !

“Absence of Evidence does not mean Evidence of Absence”, an old quote by Dr Carl Sagan, means, in a very simple term,that, if
there is lack of evidence of presence of a thing, does not always conclude to the absence of that thing totally.



Learn grasshopper.


Maybe you need a video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dfk7tW429E4

.
So – Dawkins is an Atheist !
.
HOWEVER: – UNBEKNOWNST TO DAWKINS
.
HAMMOND has in fact discovered the world's first
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD (SPOG) proven conclusively
by overwhelming SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE and in fact
has been measured to 2 decimal point accuracy !!
.
THEREFORE by his own definition: – –
.
RICHARD DAWKINS IS NO LONGER AN ATHEIST !
.
.
UNFORTUNATELY, Richard Dawkins is so famous and
so old and feeble at this point, that it is impossible to
even NOTIFY him of the discovery – much less
talk to him !
.
So in the end, recognition of Hammond's SPOG will more
likely come from people like Bill Dembski who is only 62
years old, and other scientists his age !
.
George

--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
the unchallengeable.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: sci.physics.relativity

George Hammond wrote:

On Sunday, March 19, 2023 at 12:50:03 PM UTC-4, Carmine Benedetti wrote:

that's a matrix, not a tensor. You don't even know how to treat
tensors.

[Geo. Hammond MS physics, Hyannis MA]
March 19, 2023
.
Dear Carmine Benedetti: –
Listen you Mafia fathead, you don't know any
scientific mathematics – a 2nd rank tensor
can be written as a MATRIX and at the 2nd rank
tensor multiplication is simply matrix multiplication!
No Einstein index summation needed!
.
Now let's get to the POINT – here is a facsimile
of an email letter I wrote to P rof. Jeffrey F .Cohn
at Carnegie Mellon University, where they have
actually electronically produced a picture of
GOD: –
.
[Geo. Hammond MS physics, Hyannis MA]
March 19, 2023
.
Dear Prof Jeffrey F. Cohn
Carnegie Mellon University
Pittsburghv PA
,
NOTE: – if this message is "trimmed" by Google
Groups simply click on the 3 dots "[...]" and it will
REAPPEAR
.
YOU ARE ABOUT TO SEE THE WORLD'S FIRST PICTURE OF GOD
.
[George E Hammond MS Physics, Cape Cod MA USA]
.
DISCOVERY OF DIRECT EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE
CONFIRMING HAMMOND's GOD METRIC: –
.
(ds² = a²(dx²+dy²+dz²) - dt²/a²) = GOD METRIC
.
or written as a matrix: –
.
|a² o o o. |
|o a² o o. | = (HAMMOND) METRIC OF GOD
|o o a² o. | = (slow clock/short ruler metric)
|ooo-1/a²|
.
TAKE A LOOK AT THIS PICTURE: –
.
https://html.scribdassets.com/12zrv4vq804i11gb/images/2-354f9efd5e.jpg
.
The 4 faces across the TOP are real unaltered
video pictures.
.
The 4 faces across the BOTTOM are AVATAR
creations in which the 4 real faces have had
there facial expression mathematically "DAMPED"
or "ATTENUATED" by 50% (eigenvector) magnitude--
electronically in real time!
(A highly advanced mathematical procedure BTW)
.
NOW I AM HERE TO TELL YOU that this
mathematical and electronic MIRACLE,
which is reported in this this stunning paper in
the world's most prestigious scientific journal –
PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS
OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY for 2009: –
.
......... http://goo.gl/QM7IuE
.
Is a direct PICTURE of what happens to reality
if you INCREASE "a" (the scale factor) in
Hammond's GOD METRIC: –
.
|a² o o o. |
|o a² o o. | = HAMMOND METRIC OF GOD
|o o a² o. | = (slow clock/short ruler metric)
|ooo-1/a²|
.
YOU CAN SEE WITH YOUR OWN EYES – –
THAT THIS IS THE METRIC OF GOD !!
.
George
.
George

What???? dis looks like 'deepfake' techniques from the year 2009!

https://www.iainm.com/publications/Boker2009-Effectsa/image.png http://www.iainm.com/publications/Boker2009-Effectsa/image.jpg

http://www.iainm.com/publications.html https://www.iainm.com/publications/Boker2009-Effectsa/paper.pdf






--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
the unchallengeable.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: sci.physics.relativity

George Hammond wrote:

On Thursday, April 6, 2023 at 5:32:44 PM UTC-4, JanPB wrote:

[George Hammond] wrote:
– a 2nd rank tensor
can be written as a MATRIX and at the 2nd rank,
tensor multiplication is simply matrix multiplication!

.

[JanPB] wrote:
Only when a basis has been specifically given.
Jan

.
[George Hammond] wrote:
Naturally; "A basis has been specifically given" ~
....Cartesian Coordinates are the BASIS and have
been used exclusively. Therefore the
Einstein, Friedmann, and Hammond
"TENSOR METRICS" can be written as simple
4x4 MATRICES ~
| 1 o o o. |
| o 1 o o. | = EINSTEIN METRIC
| o o 1 o. |
| o o o -1.|
.
|a² o o o. |
|o a² o o. | = FRIEDMANN (FLRW) METRIC
|o o a² o. |
|o o o-1.|
.
|a² o o o. |
|o a² o o. | = HAMMOND METRIC OF GOD
|o o a² o. |
|ooo-1/a²|
.
("a" the "scale factor" in the Friedmann and Hammond metrics
are not the same... in fact in the former "a" is increasing, and in
the latter "a" is decreasing.)
.
But so far, the only EXTRODINARY finding is that da/dt, (called the Hubble const.} is only 7%/gigayear in Friedmann's metric, BUT is near 5%/year in Hammond's metric meaning the curvature of Subjective spacetime is a
BILLION times larger than the curvature of objective spacetime
EXCEPT in the vicinity of a BLACK HOLE.... which brings up the
question of whether a Black Hole phenomenology is involved in
human life .. and if so, HOW? ~~~ And I would politely suggest
that since GRAVITY is the cause of spacetime curvature sui generous,
that the enormous spacetime curvature involved in human growth
may indicate the influence of a Black Hole curvature at work at
the Quantum Gravity level in the brain (as suggested by Roger Penrose),
and might have some connection to the question of Life After Death,
so callled?
.
George

There is no Life after Death because there is no Life.

jiggling atoms are just an animation.

You're just with the illusion of being alive.

No one is alive or dead.


--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
the unchallengeable.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)