I know you're not suppose to ask this question...
worse yet, you're not even suppose to answer it..
I know you're not suppose to ask this question...
worse yet, you're not even suppose to answer it..
But since I question the unquestionable, and ask the unaskable,...
What is the speed of light, since I don't live in a vacuum..and the universe is not in a vacuum...so What is the speed of light?
That number doesn't appear to be anywhere. Are you not suppose to know, ...or even ask?
Or even test it to find the answer because it is forbidden to test it and publish it for others to see????
What is the speed of light, since I don't 'live in' a vacuum?
Oh, I forgot..most of yous don't know what the definition of a "vacuum" is...
so for your convenience I'll post it here...(maybes yous forgots)
vac·u·um
/'vak?yo?om/
noun
a space entirely devoid of matter.
synonyms: empty space, emptiness, void, nothingness, vacuity, vacancy, voidness, nihility
https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=define+vacuum
What is the speed of light, anyway?
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
the unchallengeable.
I know you're not suppose to ask this question...
worse yet, you're not even suppose to answer it..
But since I question the unquestionable, and ask the unaskable,...
What is the speed of light, since I don't live in a vacuum..and the universe is not in a vacuum...so What is the speed of light?
That number doesn't appear to be anywhere. Are you not suppose to know, ...or even ask?
Or even test it to find the answer because it is forbidden to test it and publish it for others to see????
What is the speed of light, since I don't 'live in' a vacuum?
Oh, I forgot..most of yous don't know what the definition of a "vacuum" is...
so for your convenience I'll post it here...(maybes yous forgots)
vac·u·um
/'vak?yo?om/
noun
a space entirely devoid of matter.
synonyms: empty space, emptiness, void, nothingness, vacuity, vacancy, voidness, nihility
https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=define+vacuum
What is the speed of light, anyway?
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
the unchallengeable.
Blink of a eye.
On Sunday, January 29, 2023 at 9:57:10 PM UTC+2, The Starmaker wrote:
I know you're not suppose to ask this question...
worse yet, you're not even suppose to answer it..
But since I question the unquestionable, and ask the unaskable,...
What is the speed of light, since I don't live in a vacuum..and the universe
is not in a vacuum...so What is the speed of light?
That number doesn't appear to be anywhere. Are you not suppose to know, ...or even ask?
Or even test it to find the answer because it is forbidden to test it and publish it for others to see????
What is the speed of light, since I don't 'live in' a vacuum?
Oh, I forgot..most of yous don't know what the definition of a "vacuum" is...
so for your convenience I'll post it here...(maybes yous forgots)
vac·u·um
/'vak?yo?om/
noun
a space entirely devoid of matter.
synonyms: empty space, emptiness, void, nothingness, vacuity, vacancy, voidness, nihility
https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=define+vacuum
What is the speed of light, anyway?
Godspeed = c--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
the unchallengeable.
On 30-Jan-23 6:57 am, The Starmaker wrote:
I know you're not suppose to ask this question...
worse yet, you're not even suppose to answer it..
That seems a strange claim.
It's exactly 299,792,458 metres per second.
Sylvia.
On 4/5/2023 12:02 AM, Sylvia Else wrote:
On 30-Jan-23 6:57 am, The Starmaker wrote:
I know you're not suppose to ask this question...
worse yet, you're not even suppose to answer it..
That seems a strange claim.
It's exactly 299,792,458 metres per second.
Sylvia.We pick some star approximately 20 light years from earth. We
then predict its location for some time in the future based on
hitting that star based the speed of light you have defined for
us. If we dispatch a three second beam of light at the future
location of that star will our beam of light actually hit it?
This question is based on our knowledge of the path traveled by
our light beam appears to be a straight line while in reality
our beam of light will travel a somewhat longer geodesic path
that we cannot define.
Hint: there's more than one problem involved.
On Wednesday, April 5, 2023 at 1:30:08 PM UTC-7, whodat wrote:
On 4/5/2023 12:02 AM, Sylvia Else wrote:
On 30-Jan-23 6:57 am, The Starmaker wrote:We pick some star approximately 20 light years from earth. We
I know you're not suppose to ask this question...
worse yet, you're not even suppose to answer it..
That seems a strange claim.
It's exactly 299,792,458 metres per second.
Sylvia.
then predict its location for some time in the future based on
hitting that star based the speed of light you have defined for
us. If we dispatch a three second beam of light at the future
location of that star will our beam of light actually hit it?
This question is based on our knowledge of the path traveled by
our light beam appears to be a straight line while in reality
our beam of light will travel a somewhat longer geodesic path
that we cannot define.
Hint: there's more than one problem involved.
If the speed of light changes as from the past
their is a different E=mc Squared.
Gamma would also contain a changing light
speed. Both equations would go dynamic
by a changing light speed.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 300 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 105:47:05 |
| Calls: | 6,700 |
| Files: | 12,232 |
| Messages: | 5,350,363 |