• Re: Display, avionic, conjugate

    From D. Goncz@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jan 30 01:09:41 2024
    How about that.

    You know I bought an electronic watch some months ago maybe 2 years I don't know it didn't cost much

    And some of those watches have around scale or display that is

    Some of them have a tidy squared display


    And they connect with a little USB connector having four pins and a magnet-oriented correctly


    Well on the used market.....


    The aging watches which are not compatible with modern watch operating
    systems and routines are probably pretty available at low cost

    And separately

    I already donate to the only open source watch software group I know of

    The business opportunity is clear I don't know if I'll pursue it but it's
    clear so I'll articulated it here and then go on a little bit about the technology


    All that a person has to do to start this conjugate variable meter
    revolution without getting down into the OEM level is get a bunch of old watches takes the straps off connect the USBs boot the open source
    operating system and write an app in that system that converts the watch
    into a conjugate variable double needle display!

    Now even a two needle voltmeter showing a V1 compared to a V2 on the same
    scale as running like $300 will manufactured in America

    The double cross needle things are almost always used for radiated power
    and reflected power in evaluation of these ratio between them the SWR
    meter? And those are bloody expensive as well.


    Now the physics:

    Conjugate variables like pressure and volume and like voltage and current
    are probably pretty well known to you so I'll move on

    Conjugate variables like momentum and position and like pressure and volume
    at least I think about the case of pressure and volume I'm sure about the
    case of momentum and position are indeed what they call canonically
    conjugate variables subject to the standard Heisenberg uncertainty relation

    And the way I read that is the theme multiplication of such variables is non-commutative pardon theme is transcription there

    For example if momentum is p and position is d

    pd - dp > function of hbar only


    You see I didn't do very good at quantum so I'll stop there

    I'll hypothesize that a routine for a watch having an accelerometer in it
    would be interesting

    Interesting to physics folks anywho....

    You see the integration of acceleration provides position if you integrate twice, and the integration of acceleration provides momentum, since you
    know the mass of the watch, if you integrate once.

    So if a physics minded person might enjoy a watch where the hands could be second minute an hour hands in the conventional sense but could also be switched to two intersecting hands based in the corners of a square display showing the position and the momentum of the watch instant by instant and showing where the needles intersect what the expected uncertainty would be

    I'm just tickling your brain I'm not suggesting that anyone go off and
    start a business doing this

    Just tickling your brain and hoping to learn a little bit more about
    quantum. Perhaps one of you will comment.

    Now certainly I will go check out ebay for the old watches which are incompatible and visit my site where I donated dollar a month I mean it
    isn't much but there is an open source software that completely replaces
    all the inbuilt software in a watch

    I'll do that and report here.



    Other than that,
    [[Mod. note --

    1. I'm sorry, I mistakenly deleted the author's last line, which was
    something like "Deep in the replikon net".

    2. Are pressure and volume conjugate variables in the quantum-mechanics
    sense? Voltage and current?

    3. If the watch is attached to a (living) human, I'd expect its movements
    to be sufficiently large that quantum effects would be negligible.

    4. Finally, I don't think real accelerometers -- certainly ones small and
    light and low-power enough to fit into a watch -- are accurate enough
    to detect quantum effects in motion. See
    https://www.navigationsolutions.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Ellipse_Series_Leaflet.pdf
    to get a sense of what current commercial "small" inertial measurement
    systems look like. These combine accelerometers, magnetometers (to sense
    orientation), micromechanical gyroscopes, and GPS receivers. The brochure
    says the smallest unit in this product family weighs 45 grams, requires
    about 1/2 watt of power, and is about 34 x 34 x 13 millimeters in size.

    -- jt]]

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)