From D. Goncz@21:1/5 to All on Fri Sep 22 02:22:57 2023
[[Mod. note -- I apologise to the author and readers for the long delay
in processing this article, which arrived in the s.p.r moderation system
on 2023-Sep-16. -- jt]]
Hi physicists
Theoretically I'm an experimentalist lol
Experience demonstrates I am a theoretician LMFAO
Mass length and time comprise the units basis
Alan L Myers does not claim novelty for geometrized units but presents them well in a paper having no publication data on it so it must be right off of
his desk
Alans desk know what I mean?
We begin:
M to the one power times L to the 0 power times T or maybe even T to the 0 power is clearly indexed by the numeral 100 in an arbitrary finite base or
the vector 100 over the basis Mass length and time LOL gee whiz this? is stupid so far fairly novel
So length becomes 010 and time becomes 001 got it? Figured you would let's
move on
Mass control there is a obscure one becomes because Mass control is mass
times length divided by time cubed neatly transcribed 103 using f for the bases so we'll use that from now on update your notes f is now the basis
for time
So power is 213 and energy is 212.
What fun filling the rest of the chart for the interested reader and all
that
Alan Myers presents a formula for translating these digits or vectors to generalized numerical non-numerical excuse me two generalized excuse me
that's still wrong Alan Myers presents the following for me for translating from scientific international to the units in use for general relativity
which are natural to that work I know you know this.
On page two of the paper I have and I will take care with the translation
the product of kg to the alpha times meters to the beta times seconds to
the gamma so far so good alpha beta gamma may be expressed in SI units
using a basis of eh&c where e is an arbitrarily chosen energy unit h is
reduced plank constant and C is speed of ligt