• The second principle and inertia

    From Luigi Fortunati@21:1/5 to All on Sat Oct 8 10:50:28 2022
    In animation
    https://www.geogebra.org/m/myfn2dgd
    there are 2 wagons, one full of water and the other not, but they both
    have the same overall mass.

    [[Mod. note -- Here I have merged in 2 lines of text from the author's following post -- jt]]

    Animation in English
    https://www.geogebra.org/m/adsgahwf


    When stationary, the rigid wagon has no horizontal force.

    Instead, in the other car there is water which also exerts horizontal
    forces against the vertical walls of the car (they are the red colored
    forces).

    But, since these red forces are equal and opposite, they have no
    influence on the motion.

    However, when we press "Start" to activate the blue F forces (the same
    for both wagons), the left red force (that of the wagon with water)
    increases and the right one decreases, as you can see from the
    different length of the two forces.

    And therefore, a net red force is activated contrary to the blue force,
    which reduces the resultant of all the horizontal forces (blue and red)
    acting on the wagon with the water.

    On the other hand, in the rigid wagon, there are no other horizontal
    forces that can counteract the blue force.

    And then, will the two wagons arrive at the end together (as in the
    animation) or will the rigid carriage arrive first that has no red
    force to hinder the blue force?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Richard Livingston@21:1/5 to Luigi Fortunati on Sun Oct 9 15:35:01 2022
    On Saturday, October 8, 2022 at 12:50:33 PM UTC-5, Luigi Fortunati wrote:
    In animation
    ...
    Animation in English
    https://www.geogebra.org/m/adsgahwf

    You are missing the inertial force ("red") of the "rigid" wagon weight against the
    applied "blue" force. The "rigid" "red" force would be greater than the corresponding red force on the water wagon.

    Rich L.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Luigi Fortunati@21:1/5 to All on Sun Oct 9 21:13:47 2022
    Richard Livingston domenica 09/10/2022 alle ore 17:35:01 ha scritto:
    In animation https://www.geogebra.org/m/adsgahwf

    You are missing the inertial force ("red") of the "rigid" wagon weight against the applied "blue" force.

    Is the red force I added to my animation okay?

    The "rigid" "red" force would be greater than the corresponding red force on the water wagon.

    Ok.

    Is the acceleration of the two vagons the same?

    Luigi

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Richard Livingston@21:1/5 to Luigi Fortunati on Mon Oct 10 10:21:46 2022
    On Monday, October 10, 2022 at 1:18:14 AM UTC-5, Luigi Fortunati wrote:
    ...
    Is the acceleration of the two vagons the same?

    Luigi

    No, not initially. The water wagon will initially accelerate faster as
    the effective mass is less (because the water is not moving yet). But
    when the water sloshes back, towards the rear, it will slow down. The
    exact motion depends on the "impedance" of the tractor pulling the
    wagons.

    Rich L.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Luigi Fortunati@21:1/5 to All on Tue Oct 11 07:23:54 2022
    Richard Livingston lunedì 10/10/2022 alle ore 05:21:46 ha scritto:
    ...

    The red force that at your suggestion I added to the rigid wagon of my animation
    https://www.geogebra.org/m/adsgahwf
    in your opinion, is there or is it not?

    Is the acceleration of the two vagons the same?

    No, not initially. The water wagon will initially accelerate faster as
    the effective mass is less (because the water is not moving yet). But
    when the water sloshes back, towards the rear, it will slow down. The
    exact motion depends on the "impedance" of the tractor pulling the
    wagons.

    The water cannot move back and forth because the tank car is totally
    full and there are no empty spaces.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Richard Livingston@21:1/5 to Luigi Fortunati on Tue Oct 11 14:04:20 2022
    On Tuesday, October 11, 2022 at 2:23:59 AM UTC-5, Luigi Fortunati wrote:
    Richard Livingston lunedì 10/10/2022 alle ore 05:21:46 ha scritto:
    ...

    The red force that at your suggestion I added to the rigid wagon of my animation
    https://www.geogebra.org/m/adsgahwf
    in your opinion, is there or is it not?
    Is the acceleration of the two vagons the same?

    No, not initially. The water wagon will initially accelerate faster as
    the effective mass is less (because the water is not moving yet). But
    when the water sloshes back, towards the rear, it will slow down. The
    exact motion depends on the "impedance" of the tractor pulling the
    wagons.
    The water cannot move back and forth because the tank car is totally
    full and there are no empty spaces.

    In that case the two cars will behave exactly the same.

    Rich L.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Luigi Fortunati@21:1/5 to All on Tue Oct 11 12:46:30 2022
    Richard Livingston luned=EC 10/10/2022 alle ore 05:21:46 ha scritto:
    ...

    La forza rossa che su tuo suggerimento ho aggiunto al vagone rigido
    della mia animazione
    https://www.geogebra.org/m/adsgahwf
    secondo il tuo parere, c'=E8 o non c'=E8?

    Is the acceleration of the two vagons the same?

    No, not initially. The water wagon will initially accelerate faster as
    the effective mass is less (because the water is not moving yet). But
    when the water sloshes back, towards the rear, it will slow down. The
    exact motion depends on the "impedance" of the tractor pulling the
    wagons.

    The water cannot move back and forth because the tank car is totally
    full and there are no empty spaces.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Luigi Fortunati@21:1/5 to All on Tue Oct 11 22:33:09 2022
    Richard Livingston martedì 11/10/2022 alle ore 16:04:20 ha scritto:
    The water cannot move back and forth because the tank car is totally full and there are no empty spaces.

    In that case the two cars will behave exactly the same.

    And this means that in the rigid vagon there is a horizontal inertial
    force during acceleration, as can be seen in my last animation
    https://www.geogebra.org/m/eega7se6

    The strange thing is that inertial forces should only "appear" in
    accelerated reference frame and not in my animation set in inertial
    reference frame.

    Luigi

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Luigi Fortunati@21:1/5 to All on Thu Oct 13 12:59:22 2022
    A similar situation to my previous animation is the following: https://www.geogebra.org/m/gbqzyba2

    In the inertial reference frame of the ground, when bodies are still,
    there is no centripetal force and there is no centrifugal force either.

    During the rotation, the blue centripetal force is activated which is
    the only force acting on body A.

    Instead, on body B (full of water but with the same overall mass as
    body A), in addition to the blue force, the red force of the water
    directed outwards (i.e. in the opposite direction to the centripetal
    force) also acts.

    In your opinion, is it correct that different forces act on body B than
    on body A, only because of their different rigidity?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Richard Livingston@21:1/5 to Luigi Fortunati on Sun Oct 16 13:08:31 2022
    On Thursday, October 13, 2022 at 2:59:27 PM UTC-5, Luigi Fortunati wrote:
    A similar situation to my previous animation is the following: https://www.geogebra.org/m/gbqzyba2

    In the inertial reference frame of the ground, when bodies are still,
    there is no centripetal force and there is no centrifugal force either.

    During the rotation, the blue centripetal force is activated which is
    the only force acting on body A.

    Instead, on body B (full of water but with the same overall mass as
    body A), in addition to the blue force, the red force of the water
    directed outwards (i.e. in the opposite direction to the centripetal
    force) also acts.

    In your opinion, is it correct that different forces act on body B than
    on body A, only because of their different rigidity?

    No, the weight without water has the same "red" reaction force. There
    is no difference.

    Rich L.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jonathan Thornburg [remove -color t@21:1/5 to Luigi Fortunati on Sun Oct 16 13:09:31 2022
    Luigi Fortunati <fortunati.luigi@gmail.com> wrote:
    A similar situation to my previous animation is the following: https://www.geogebra.org/m/gbqzyba2

    In the inertial reference frame of the ground, when bodies are still,
    there is no centripetal force and there is no centrifugal force either.

    During the rotation, the blue centripetal force is activated which is
    the only force acting on body A.

    I would phrase this slightly differently: in the rotating state there
    *must* be a "blue" centripetal force acting on each body, otherwise the
    body would move in a straight line, not in a circle.

    Instead, on body B (full of water but with the same overall mass as
    body A), in addition to the blue force, the red force of the water
    directed outwards (i.e. in the opposite direction to the centripetal
    force) also acts.

    The mass of the empty B must be less than the mass of A (the difference
    being the mass of the water). So, the overall centripetal force acting
    on the water-filled B must be sum of the centripetal force which would
    be required to give the empty B that same centripetal acceleration, plus
    the centripetal force which is required to give the water its centripetal acceleration. (*)

    If we approximate the diameter of B as small relative to the radius
    of B's orbit around the rotation axis, then the centripetal acceleration
    is uniform across the diameter of B.

    Let's introduce a few symbols:
    M_A = mass of A
    M_B = mass of the solid body B without the water
    M_W = mass of the water
    a = the magnitude of the centripetal acceleration
    T = the tension in the string that ties each body to the rotation
    axis; this tension is the same for A and B since M_A = M_B + M_W

    Then by Newton's 2nd law, the net force (centripetal) acting on A
    must be given by $T = M_A a$, and the net force (again centripetal)
    acting on the water-filled B must be
    T = (M_B + M_W) a = M_B a + M_W a (1)
    which is just the statement (*) above.

    Ultimately the only thing exerting forces on the water is B, i.e.,
    the solid body B must exert an inward (centripetal) net force of
    $M_W a$ on the water, and by Newton's 3rd law the water must exert
    a corresponding (equal in magnitude, opposite in direction) centrifugal
    force $M_W a$ on the solid body B.

    As is often the case in Newtonian mechanics, it's instructive to draw
    some free-body diagrams. I'll show these for the case where A and B
    have each rotated 180 degrees, i.e., they are directly to the right
    of the rotation axis, so their centripetal accelerations point left:

    Free-body diagram for A:

    <-------- A

    There is only one force acting on A: the string tension $T$, pointing
    inwards towards the rotation axis (to the left). This is shown in blue
    in Luigi's animation.

    Free-body diagram for the solid body B (note we are considering the water
    to be a separate body):

    <-------- B ----->

    There are two forces acting on the solid body B (again, we are considering
    the water to be a separate body):
    * the string tension $T$ to the left; this is shown in blue in
    Luigi's animation
    * the force the water exerts on B, $M_W a$, to the right; this is
    shown in red in Luigi's animation, but the animation wrongly shows
    the magnitude of this force as being the same as that of the blue
    force $T$; it's actually smaller than $T$

    The net force on B is the algebraic sum of these two forces, $T - M_W a$
    to the left. This is smaller than the net force acting on A, which is just what we expect, since A and B have the same (centripetal) acceleration $a$,
    but the mass of the solid body B is less than the mass of A. In fact,

    F_net = T - M_W a (2)
    = (M_B + M_W) a - M_W a [by equation (1)] (3)
    = M_B a (4)

    And finally, here's a free-body diagram for the water:

    <----- W

    There is only one force acting on the water, which is exerted by B
    and which points inwards towards the rotation axis (i.e., to the left).
    The magnitude of this force is $M_W a$.

    We can also analyze the forces between B and the water in detail, but
    that takes a little bit more work (and some elementary calculus):

    To keep things simple, I'll assume that the water in B rotates like
    a rigid body, with the same angular frequency as B. (If the rotation
    of B is uniform and lasts long enough, then the small-but-nonzero
    viscosity of water will result in the water's velocity field gradually approaching this rigid-body-rotation state.)

    Assuming this rigid-body rotation, let's consider what force(s) act
    on each little (infinitesimal) volume element of water. In particular, consider an infintesimal volume element of mass $dm$, which is at a
    radius $r$ from the rotation axis.

    There are two physical processes which can exert forces on this water
    element:
    (a) there may be a pressure gradient in the water, and
    (b) the walls of B may directly exert forces on the water immediately
    adjacent to the walls

    Consider process (a): if we take our infinitesimal volume element to
    of water be a cylinder with flat sides of area dA facing towards & away
    from the rotation axis, and to extend from radius-from-rotation-axis r
    to r+dr, then we have

    dm = dA dr rho (5)

    where rho is the density of water (we assume rho to be constant, i.e.,
    we're neglecting the compressibility of water). The net force acting
    on the volume element of water due to the pressure gradient is then
    the difference between the forces acting on the two opposite flat faces
    of the volume element, i.e.,

    dF_net = p(r+dr) dA - p(r) dA (6)

    Also, by Newton's 2nd law (since this volume element of mass dm is moving
    with centripetal acceleration $a$), there must be a net force acting on
    the volume element of

    dF_net = dm a (7)
    = dA dr a [here we're using (5)] (8)

    Comparing (6) and (8), we then have

    dA dr rho a = (p(r+dr) dA - p(r)) dA (9)

    where p = p(r) is the pressure as a function of position. Dividing
    by dA, this gives

    dr rho a = p(r+dr) - p(r) (10)

    and hence

    rho a = dp/dr (11)

    and hence

    p(r) = K + rho a r (12)

    where $K$ is an arbitrary constant. If we think about the case where
    $a = 0$, i.e., there is no rotation and hence no centripetal acceleration,
    we can see that the constant $K$ is just the initial water pressure in
    this non-rotating state (i.e., the water pressure in B before B started rotating).

    Equation (12) tells us how the water pressure varies with position inside
    B. In particular, (12) says that the water pressure is larger on the side
    of B which is farther away from the rotation axis, and smaller on the side
    of B which is closer to the rotation axis. (If the constant $K$ is small enough, the pressure may even be negative in some/all of the water;
    this corresponds to "tension".)

    Now considering process (b) above, at each point on B's inside surface
    the water pressure acts perpendicular to B's inside surface, and by
    Newton's 3rd law B's inside surface exerts an equal and opposite force
    (also perpendicular to B's surface) on the water.

    Now let's temporarily assume that $K$ is large and positive, so that
    the pressure given by (12) is always positive. Then:

    Since the water pressure is larger on the side of B which is farther
    away from the rotation axis, where the water exerts a force on B
    *away* from the rotation axis, and smaller on the side of B which is
    closer to the rotation axis, where the water exerts a force on B
    *towards* the rotation axis, it's easy to see that the net force of
    the water on B must point *away* from the rotation axis. (We could
    work this force out in detail by integrating the radial component of
    the right hand side of (12) over B's inner surface.) We saw above
    that this force has magnitude $M_W a$.

    Similarly, since the pressure B's inside surface exerts on the water
    is larger on the side of B which is farther away from the rotation axis,
    where this force points *towards* the rotation axis, and smaller on
    the side of B which is closer to the rotation axis, where this force
    points *away* from the rotation axis, it's easy to see that the net
    force of B on the water must point *towards* the rotation axis.
    (Again, we could work this out in detail by integrating the radial
    component of the right hand side of equation (12) over B's inner
    surface.) Again, we saw above that this force has magnitude $M_W a$.

    Finally, let's return to our temporary assumption that $K$ is large
    and positive, so that the pressure given by (12) is always positive.
    Notice that $K$ corresponds to a pressure which is constant everywhere
    on B's inside surface. Thus, by symmetry, changing $K$ does *not* change
    the net force the water exerts on B, or the net force B exerts on the
    water. Thus, our conclusions in the previous two paragraphs about
    these net forces don't depend on the value of $K$, and so remain valid
    for an arbitrary $K$. That is, we can now drop our temporary assumption
    that $K$ was large and positive.

    --
    -- "Jonathan Thornburg [remove -color to reply]" <dr.j.thornburg@gmail-pink.com>
    on the west coast of Canada
    "Now back when I worked in banking, if someone went to Barclays,
    pretended to be me, borrowed UKP10,000 and legged it, that was
    `impersonation', and it was the bank's money that had been stolen,
    not my identity. How did things change?" -- Ross Anderson

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jonathan Thornburg [remove -color t@21:1/5 to All on Sun Oct 16 23:11:57 2022
    In article <Y0uTogSzUz354lyA@iron.bkis-orchard.net>, I wrote:
    [[analysis of Luigi's system]]

    Two small corrections to my derivation of the water pressure inside B
    as a function of r (the distance from the rotation axis):

    Correction #1: I wrote:

    The net force acting
    on the volume element of water due to the pressure gradient is then
    the difference between the forces acting on the two opposite flat faces
    of the volume element, i.e.,

    dF_net = p(r+dr) dA - p(r) dA (6)


    Here (right after equation (6)) I should have inserted the phrase

    where p = p(r) is the pressure as a function of position.

    Correction #2: A few lines later, I wrote:

    Also, by Newton's 2nd law (since this volume element of mass dm is moving with centripetal acceleration $a$), there must be a net force acting on
    the volume element of

    dF_net = dm a (7)
    = dA dr a [here we're using (5)] (8)

    Oops, I left out a factor of rho in the right hand side of (8),
    i.e., I should have written

    dF_net = dm a (7)
    = dA dr rho a [here we're using (5)] (8)

    It may also be worth noting that nothing in my analysis made use of the
    fact that A and B are actually in *circular* motion about their rotation
    axis; I only used the fact that they have a net acceleration (which I
    called $a$) in the direction towards that axis, i.e., to the left in my free-body diagrams. So, my analysis, including those free-body
    diagrams, would have been unchanged had the physical situation instead
    been that the string had a rocket with thrust $T$ attached to it,
    accelerating A and B to the left with respect to an inertial reference
    frame.

    --
    -- "Jonathan Thornburg [remove -color to reply]" <dr.j.thornburg@gmail-pink.com>
    on the west coast of Canada
    "quit When the quit statement is read, the bc processor is terminated,
    regardless of where the quit statement is found. For example,
    'if (0 == 1) quit' will cause bc to terminate.
    -- old Unix manpage for 'bc'"

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Luigi Fortunati@21:1/5 to All on Sun Oct 16 22:55:18 2022
    Jonathan Thornburg [remove -color to reply] domenica 16/10/2022 alle
    ore 14:09:31 ha scritto:
    Ultimately the only thing exerting forces on the water is B

    Ok.

    The net force on B is the algebraic sum of these two forces

    Ok.

    You break body B into two parts: the solid body B and the water it
    contains.

    So, I updated my animation which is now this: https://www.geogebra.org/m/deqamevm

    I added at 180° stop button, where (as per your right suggestion) you
    can see that the centrifugal red force (5) exerted by the water on body
    B is smaller than the centripetal blue force (10) exerted by the rope
    on the body B.

    And I also added the blue (centripetal) reaction force of body B on the
    water.

    Therefore, on the solid structure of the body B acts (as you wrote) a
    net force of 5 (10 of the string minus 5 of the water).

    And on the water only the blue centripetal force (5) of the solid body
    B acts.

    Is my animation correct now?

    [[Mod. note -- It looks correct to me. -- jt]]

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Luigi Fortunati@21:1/5 to All on Mon Oct 17 09:40:53 2022
    Richard Livingston domenica 16/10/2022 alle ore 14:08:31 ha scritto:
    A similar situation to my previous animation is the following:
    https://www.geogebra.org/m/gbqzyba2

    In the inertial reference frame of the ground, when bodies are still,
    there is no centripetal force and there is no centrifugal force either.

    During the rotation, the blue centripetal force is activated which is
    the only force acting on body A.

    Instead, on body B (full of water but with the same overall mass as
    body A), in addition to the blue force, the red force of the water
    directed outwards (i.e. in the opposite direction to the centripetal
    force) also acts.

    In your opinion, is it correct that different forces act on body B than
    on body A, only because of their different rigidity?

    No, the weight without water has the same "red" reaction force. There
    is no difference.

    Is this red reaction force (you speak of) directed against body A (like
    the red water force of body B) or is it directed against the rope?

    Is this red reaction force (you speak of) a real force (like the red
    water force of body B) or is it an apparent force?

    Luigi

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)