The creation of momentum with my new invention, the low voltage heavy armature rail gun.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zYtyOMbgiZ0
The updating of Newtonian laws of motion... delete "external" from the first law and add "mechanical" to action in the third law
Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee
Director
HTN Research Pty Ltd
Melbourne
On Tuesday, 15 March 2022 at 09:51:49 UTC+11, banerjee...@gmail.com wrote:
The creation of momentum with my new invention, the low voltage heavy armature rail gun.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zYtyOMbgiZ0
The updating of Newtonian laws of motion... delete "external" from the first law and add "mechanical" to action in the third law
Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee
Director
HTN Research Pty Ltd
Melbourne
This will involve the rewriting of all physics textbooks, based upon the following theories and insights.
The physics aphorisms of Arindam
1.1 While relativity is completely wrong, such cannot be said of quantum theory.
1.2 However it depends upon energy levels of the orbital electrons. It ignores the existence of aether. It is devoid of any geometric basis for electron movement.
1.3 Depending upon energy levels to begin with is perilous. Energy is for business and money-making - the physicist should be interested primarily about forces. And as force unlike power/energy is a vector quantity, and so has direction, the geometricalsituation is of paramount importance.
1.4 Using quantum theory, reflection of light may be explained this way - an incoming packet of energy called a photon causes an electron to jump from a lower energy orbital shell to a higher energy orbital shell. This is unstable, so it jumps down fromthe higher energy orbital shell to the lower energy orbital shell. The difference in energy is emitted now as a photon.
1.5 In 1.4 above the implicit notion is that the electron orbits are circular. It is also implied that the photon must have some mass as it has energy following e=mcc, and this mass with movmentum mc has the energy to kick up the electron to the higherorbit shell.
1.6 Now let us consider the above phenomenon in terms of aether, forces and geometries.is a disturbance with no mass.
1.7 Aether by definition is a very fine solid through which all protons and electrons and neutrons pass the way bullets may go through grass which does not break but just bends. The photon in the aetheric context is a small burst of radiant energy. It
1.8 When this aetheric disturbance caused by the radiation reaches the electron and as it envelops the electron, it changes the orbit of the electron by displacement.
1.9 In the process of displacement the disturbance loses its energy as the force to displace the electron is lost with the movement of the electron. This is for the first quarter cycle of the wave - from zero to peak
1.10 As a result of the energy absorption the orbit of the electron is no longer circular but elliptical, and more "high energy" that way.
1.11 An electric field is created with the dipole effect caused by the elliptic orbit. There was no electric field before the disturbance; now there is; so there has been a change of electric field meaning that has to be a corresponding changingmagnetic field. Which will creating another changing electric field and so on till we have a burst of radiation, equivalent to the photon.
1.12 The electron at the higher energy level or greater ellipticity can be returned to the original orbit shell with the next quarter of the wave, from peak to zero. Again, as per 1.11 there will be a electromagnetic wave formation completing the halfcycle.
1.13 The electron in this case does not behave as a single orbiting particle but as a thin and elastic rubber band.
1.14 The idea of the electron not as a particle but as a rubber band is of crucial importance in our study of he nucleus of an atom.
2.1 Aether, a solid made of infinitely fine particles, fills the entire >infinite universe.
2.2 The particles can vibrate, that is, oscillate about their mean positions.
2.3 The only force in the universe is electric as matter is made up of positive and negative charges.
2.4 When the electric field changes, it creates a changing magnetic field, which creates a changing electric field and so on. The changing electric fields vibrate the aether.
2.5 If the electric field loops as in a current, there is a steady magnetic field.
2.6 Matter is made up of negative charges called electrons and protons that are positive charges.
2.7 Under mutual attraction, they go through aether as a diver through a wave. When static, they let the wave push them this way and that.
2.8 Aether is a solid but its density cannot be found as aether fills everything including the space within the atom.
2.9 Only the density of protons and electrons can be estimated, for their mass and volume may be known from experiments.
2.10 Aether cannot affect the normal movement of the electrons and protons as they go through aether. There is no drag.
2.11 Aether bends to let electrons and protons squeeze through. No loss of momentum, thus, in the normal situation.
2.11 But with the applies electric field there is aetheric swaying from >vibration about their mean positions according to the frequency of the >changing electric field. This is what moves the electrons from their normal states. In this displacement of the electron the kinetic energy of the electromagnetic wave is absorbed.
2.12 Thus only when there is an electric field causing vibration to the aether there is momentum transfer to the electron.
2.13 Electrons are like rubber bands while protons may be spherical.
3.1 The aether particles are infinitely small by definition.
3.2 As they are infinitely small like points they have as you say no shape nor structure not volume.
3.3 Under the impact of electrical forces they vibrate and this vibration impacts upon the momentum of the electrons.
3.4 Thus the kinetic energy of the vibration transforms to the kinetic energy of the electron.
3.5 The reverse situation happens when the electron loses its kinetic energy. It creates the aetheric vibration.
3.6 This is understood it as water molecules going past a very thin set of wires forming a sieve. Only this time the water molecules stick to each other in their relative positions.
3.7 Aether particles bend aside to let the electrons and protons pass through them.
On Mon, 14 Mar 2022 23:23:48 -0700 (PDT), "banerjee...@gmail.com" <banerjee...@gmail.com> wrote:Both.
On Tuesday, 15 March 2022 at 09:51:49 UTC+11, banerjee...@gmail.com wrote: >> The creation of momentum with my new invention, the low voltage heavy armature rail gun.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zYtyOMbgiZ0
The updating of Newtonian laws of motion... delete "external" from the first law and add "mechanical" to action in the third law
Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee
Director
HTN Research Pty Ltd
Melbourne
This will involve the rewriting of all physics textbooks, based upon the following theories and insights.
The physics aphorisms of Arindam
1.1 While relativity is completely wrong, such cannot be said of quantum theory.IS THAT THE GENERAL OR SPECIAL RELATIVITY THAT IS COMPLETELY WRONG?
As per standard texts electrons orbit the nucleus of the atom at certain energy levels. Greater the distance of the radius of the orbit from the nucleus centre, higher the energy in the sense that it takes external force or external energy to make it go1.2 However it depends upon energy levels of the orbital electrons. It ignores the existence of aether. It is devoid of any geometric basis for electron movement.WHAT IS THE REFERENCE FRAME THAT DETERMINES THE ENERGY OF THE
ELECTRON?
geometrical situation is of paramount importance.1.3 Depending upon energy levels to begin with is perilous. Energy is for business and money-making - the physicist should be interested primarily about forces. And as force unlike power/energy is a vector quantity, and so has direction, the
THE POYNTING VECTOR IS A MEASURE OF ENERGY FLOWYes. Physicists should avoid talk of energy. Talk of forces instead.
from the higher energy orbital shell to the lower energy orbital shell. The difference in energy is emitted now as a photon.1.4 Using quantum theory, reflection of light may be explained this way - an incoming packet of energy called a photon causes an electron to jump from a lower energy orbital shell to a higher energy orbital shell. This is unstable, so it jumps down
FOR THIS TO BE TRUE THE DIFFERENCE IN ENERGY FOR EMISSION HAS TOYes.
EXACTLY EQUAL THE ENERGY OF THE IMPINGING PHOTON OTHERWISE IT WILL
HAVE A DIFFERENT WAVELENGTH
higher orbit shell.1.5 In 1.4 above the implicit notion is that the electron orbits are circular. It is also implied that the photon must have some mass as it has energy following e=mcc, and this mass with movmentum mc has the energy to kick up the electron to the
REST MASS OR ELECTROMAGNETIC MASS?I don't know, they are both nonsense to me. Just that if the photon has energy e which is equal to mcc, it must have mass e/(cc) = m. Whether it is rest mass or electromagnetic, is up to the believer. Going by quantum theory logic, there can be no rest
is a disturbance with no mass.1.6 Now let us consider the above phenomenon in terms of aether, forces and geometries.
1.7 Aether by definition is a very fine solid through which all protons and electrons and neutrons pass the way bullets may go through grass which does not break but just bends. The photon in the aetheric context is a small burst of radiant energy. It
IF IT IS SOLID THEN HOW CAN ANYTHING PASS THROUGH IT? IF IT'S SOLID
THEN DOES THE COULOMB GAUGE APPLY?
Things always pass through aether.1.8 When this aetheric disturbance caused by the radiation reaches the electron and as it envelops the electron, it changes the orbit of the electron by displacement.IF THINGS PASS THROUGH THE AETHER THEN HOW IS THE ELECTRON DISPLACED?
When any light is blocked its speed becomes zero, yes. Like anything kinetic. Speed of light varies with the medium.1.9 In the process of displacement the disturbance loses its energy as the force to displace the electron is lost with the movement of the electron. This is for the first quarter cycle of the wave - from zero to peak
DOES THIS MEAN THAT LIGHT SLOWS DOWN AS IT TRAVELS?
If the nucleus is off centre then the orbit has to be elliptic.1.10 As a result of the energy absorption the orbit of the electron is no longer circular but elliptical, and more "high energy" that way.WHY CANT THE ORBIT BE CIRCULAR WITH THE NUCLEUS BEING OFF CENTER?
magnetic field. Which will creating another changing electric field and so on till we have a burst of radiation, equivalent to the photon.1.11 An electric field is created with the dipole effect caused by the elliptic orbit. There was no electric field before the disturbance; now there is; so there has been a change of electric field meaning that has to be a corresponding changing
IF A CHANGING E FIELD CAUSE A CHANGING H FIELD WHICH CAUSES A CHANGING
E FIELD, WHY THEN IS E&H RELATED THROUGH THE INTRINSIC IMPEDANCE OF
SPACE EXCEPT WHEN IT HAS PASSED THROUGH SHIELDING MATERIAL AND BACK
INTO FREE SPACE?
cycle.1.12 The electron at the higher energy level or greater ellipticity can be returned to the original orbit shell with the next quarter of the wave, from peak to zero. Again, as per 1.11 there will be a electromagnetic wave formation completing the half
WHAT FORCES IT TO RETURN TO THE ORIGINAL ORBIT?The electrostatic pull from the other electrons in their original orbits.
It acts like an indestructible rubber band and that way it is a single particle in many different configurations. In the nucleus it sticks to the proton creating a neutron. It can stick to two protons creating a deuterium nucleus.1.13 The electron in this case does not behave as a single orbiting particle but as a thin and elastic rubber band.A RUBBER BAND IS COMPOSED OF MANY PARTICLES. WHAT IS THE RESTORING
FORCE?
As may neutrons are there.1.14 The idea of the electron not as a particle but as a rubber band is of crucial importance in our study of he nucleus of an atom.HOW MANY ELECTRONS ARE THERE IN THE NUCLEUS OF AN ATOM?
Did I say waves above? Do I have any regard for the schizophrenia regarding light?2.1 Aether, a solid made of infinitely fine particles, fills the entire >infinite universe.PARTICLES OR WAVES? HOW DOES THE DEBROGLIE WAVELENGTH COME ABOUT?
They are all fixed in place as aether is a solid.2.2 The particles can vibrate, that is, oscillate about their mean positions.WHAT HOLDS THEM IN PLACE, WHAT IS THE RESTORATION FORCE?
No fundamental forces are involved when two neutrons collide. This is a purely mechanical situation involving momentum.2.3 The only force in the universe is electric as matter is made up of positive and negative charges.WHAT FORCES ARE INVOLVED WHEN 2 NEUTRONS COLLIDE?
Yes.2.4 When the electric field changes, it creates a changing magnetic field, which creates a changing electric field and so on. The changing electric fields vibrate the aether.DOES A SINGLE MOVING ELECTRON HAVE A MAGNETIC FIELD?
Yes.2.5 If the electric field loops as in a current, there is a steady magnetic field.DOES A SINGLE MOVING ELECTRON IS A STRAIGHT LINE HAVE A MAGNETIC
FIELD?
A neutron is an electron sticking to a proton in the strongest embrace.2.6 Matter is made up of negative charges called electrons and protons that are positive charges.NO NEUTRONS THEN.
Aether conducts the force of the attraction, but the attraction itself is fundamental.2.7 Under mutual attraction, they go through aether as a diver through a wave. When static, they let the wave push them this way and that.IS THE FORCE OF THEIR ATTRACTION DUE TO THE AETHER?
The density cannot be known.2.8 Aether is a solid but its density cannot be found as aether fills everything including the space within the atom.IF THE DENSITY ISNT KNOWN, HOW IS IT KNOWN THAT IT IS SOLID?
Theoretically, yes, but of density indeterminable.2.9 Only the density of protons and electrons can be estimated, for their mass and volume may be known from experiments.DOES AETHER HAVE MASS THEN?
2.10 Aether cannot affect the normal movement of the electrons and protons as they go through aether. There is no drag.IF THERE IS NO DRAG THEN SURELY THESE PARTICLES CAN EXCEED THE SPEED
OF LIGHT
2.11 Aether bends to let electrons and protons squeeze through. No loss of momentum, thus, in the normal situation.IF THEY SQUEEZE THROUGH ARE THEY REFRACTED BY THE GRANULARITY OF THE
AETHER?
2.11 But with the applies electric field there is aetheric swaying from >vibration about their mean positions according to the frequency of the >changing electric field. This is what moves the electrons from their normal states. In this displacement of the electron the kinetic energy of the electromagnetic wave is absorbed.IF THE ENERGY IS ABSORBED HOW COULD ANY WAVE BE REFLECTED?
2.12 Thus only when there is an electric field causing vibration to the aether there is momentum transfer to the electron.WHERE DOES THIS MOMENTUM COME FROM? IF THERE IS A TIME DELAY FROM THE
SOURCE TO THE ELECTRON, HOW IS MOMENTUM CONSERVED?
2.13 Electrons are like rubber bands while protons may be spherical.
HOW IS THIS MEASURED?
No. The 19th century conception of aether was of aether as a solid.3.1 The aether particles are infinitely small by definition.WOULDNT THAT MAKE THE AETHER A FLUID?
Because there are infinitely many of them held together.3.2 As they are infinitely small like points they have as you say no shape nor structure not volume.IF THEY HAVE NO VOLUME HOW CAN THEY FILL ANYTHING?
3.3 Under the impact of electrical forces they vibrate and this vibration impacts upon the momentum of the electrons.
3.4 Thus the kinetic energy of the vibration transforms to the kinetic energy of the electron.
3.5 The reverse situation happens when the electron loses its kinetic energy. It creates the aetheric vibration.
3.6 This is understood it as water molecules going past a very thin set of wires forming a sieve. Only this time the water molecules stick to each other in their relative positions.SURFACE TENSION AND POLAR MOLECULES = WATER
3.7 Aether particles bend aside to let the electrons and protons pass through them.HOW DOES THE AETHER KNOW ITS TIME TO BEND ASIDE?
YOU MAY HAVE AN INTEREST IN THIS, IT'S RECOMMENDED TO READ AT LEAST
THE FIRST 20-30 PAGES:
<http://www.tuks.nl/pdf/RecevedConsiderations/RolandDishington/2001Rev.pdf>
The creation of momentum with my new invention, the low voltage heavy armature rail gun.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zYtyOMbgiZ0
The updating of Newtonian laws of motion... delete "external" from the first law and add "mechanical" to action in the third law
Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee
Director
HTN Research Pty Ltd
Melbourne
The creation of momentum with my new invention, the low voltage heavy armature rail gun.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zYtyOMbgiZ0
The updating of Newtonian laws of motion... delete "external" from the first law and add "mechanical" to action in the third law
Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee
Director
HTN Research Pty Ltd
Melbourne
The electromagnetic push is from heat energy instead.
Rocket scientists use it.
Mitchell Raemsch
On Monday, 30 May 2022 at 07:51:17 UTC+10, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
The electromagnetic push is from heat energy instead.No, they use heat to push out matter at high speed.
Rocket scientists use it.
Mitchell Raemsch
On Friday, June 3, 2022 at 6:56:25 PM UTC-7, banerjee...@gmail.com wrote:Matter is NOT pushed out, or back.
On Monday, 30 May 2022 at 07:51:17 UTC+10, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:What is the difference?
The electromagnetic push is from heat energy instead.No, they use heat to push out matter at high speed.
Rocket scientists use it.
Mitchell Raemsch
On Monday, 6 June 2022 at 04:40:41 UTC+10, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Friday, June 3, 2022 at 6:56:25 PM UTC-7, banerjee...@gmail.com wrote:Matter is NOT pushed out, or back.
On Monday, 30 May 2022 at 07:51:17 UTC+10, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:What is the difference?
The electromagnetic push is from heat energy instead.No, they use heat to push out matter at high speed.
Rocket scientists use it.
Mitchell Raemsch
On Monday, June 6, 2022 at 3:59:09 PM UTC-7, banerjee...@gmail.com wrote:It does so in all directions, normally.
On Monday, 6 June 2022 at 04:40:41 UTC+10, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Friday, June 3, 2022 at 6:56:25 PM UTC-7, banerjee...@gmail.com wrote:Matter is NOT pushed out, or back.
On Monday, 30 May 2022 at 07:51:17 UTC+10, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:What is the difference?
The electromagnetic push is from heat energy instead.No, they use heat to push out matter at high speed.
Rocket scientists use it.
Heat can push or slow matter.Mitchell Raemsch
Just like gravity.No.
Mitchell Raemsch
On Wednesday, 29 June 2022 at 06:06:59 UTC+10, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, June 6, 2022 at 3:59:09 PM UTC-7, banerjee...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, 6 June 2022 at 04:40:41 UTC+10, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Friday, June 3, 2022 at 6:56:25 PM UTC-7, banerjee...@gmail.com wrote:Matter is NOT pushed out, or back.
On Monday, 30 May 2022 at 07:51:17 UTC+10, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:What is the difference?
The electromagnetic push is from heat energy instead.No, they use heat to push out matter at high speed.
Rocket scientists use it.
It does so in all directions, normally.Heat can push or slow matter.Mitchell Raemsch
In an engine , it moves the piston but also acts on the head.
Just like gravity.No.
Mitchell Raemsch
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 366 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 19:06:12 |
Calls: | 7,831 |
Files: | 12,930 |
Messages: | 5,770,362 |