chemguy wrote:
The four quantum numbers (n, L, mL, ms) are well defined in the literature. >> Where; ms is magnetic moment associated with spin; ms = (spin up, spin down)
One usually writes m_L and m_s, otherwise that is correct.
The four quantum numbers (n, L, mL, ms) are well defined in the literature. Where; ms is magnetic moment associated with spin; ms = ±½ (spin up, spin down)
It is reasonable to assume that the rotation of a bound electron may set up a magnetic dipole.
The four quantum numbers (n, L, mL, ms) are well defined in the literature. Where; ms is magnetic moment associated with spin; ms = ±½ (spin up, spin down)=======================
It is reasonable to assume that the rotation of a bound electron may set up a magnetic dipole. If a magnetic dipole does exist then the magnetic moment “associated with orbit” (mn) may have two possible values;
mn = ±½
Where;
mn = -½ represents “dipole north”
mn = +½ represents “dipole south”
Does a bound electron have orbital magnetic moment?
Reference; http://newstuff77.weebly.com page 01 The Pyramid Periodic Table
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 296 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 78:53:21 |
Calls: | 6,658 |
Calls today: | 4 |
Files: | 12,203 |
Messages: | 5,333,077 |
Posted today: | 1 |