• A Fundamental Matter

    From Ned Latham@21:1/5 to All on Sun Nov 24 21:20:06 2019
    Abstract: "Twenty-first century science faces a dilemma: two of its well-verified foundation stones, relativity and quantum theory, have
    proven inconsistent. Resolution of the conflict has resisted
    improvements in experimental precision leaving some to believe that some fundamental understanding in our world view may need modification or
    even radical reform."[1]

    The view taken here is that the problem dates back to the nineteenth
    century, when Thomas Young conducted an experiment that was seen as definitively contradicting the particle model of light, and Henri
    Bequerel discovered the photovoltaic effect, which was seen as
    definitively contradicting the wave model of light. The need for a
    model consistent with both results led eventually to Einstein's theory
    of Special Relativity and thence to the present dilemma. Recognition
    that there is a particulate explanation for the result of Young's
    experiment solves the dilemma instantly: relativity theory is
    superfluous.

    "The Particle Theory of Matter" consists of four postulates naming and describing the three fundamental entities Space, Force and Matter, and
    the derived phenomenon Energy.

    "The Particle Model of Light" defines frequency and wavelength as they
    apply to light and provides explanations of light's behaviours,
    including the result of Young's experiment.

    "Suggestions for Research includes experiments that will unequivocably contradict either particle theory or relativity theory.

    Keywords: particle theory; particle model; Young's experiment

    --------
    1 Gareth Boardman, "Addressing the conflict between Relativity and
    Quantum Theory: Models, measurement and the Markhov property", The
    Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy, vol 9, no 2, 2013.

    If requested, I'll post the whole thing here. It totals about 200 lines.

    http://www.users.on.net/~nedlatham/Science/Physics/index.html

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From poraty4@gmail.com@21:1/5 to Ned Latham on Wed Dec 25 08:02:39 2019
    On Monday, November 25, 2019 at 5:20:12 AM UTC+2, Ned Latham wrote:
    Abstract: "Twenty-first century science faces a dilemma: two of its well-verified foundation stones, relativity and quantum theory, have
    proven inconsistent. Resolution of the conflict has resisted
    improvements in experimental precision leaving some to believe that some fundamental understanding in our world view may need modification or
    even radical reform."[1]

    The view taken here is that the problem dates back to the nineteenth
    century, when Thomas Young conducted an experiment that was seen as definitively contradicting the particle model of light, and Henri
    Bequerel discovered the photovoltaic effect, which was seen as
    definitively contradicting the wave model of light. The need for a
    model consistent with both results led eventually to Einstein's theory
    of Special Relativity and thence to the present dilemma. Recognition
    that there is a particulate explanation for the result of Young's
    experiment solves the dilemma instantly: relativity theory is
    superfluous.

    "The Particle Theory of Matter" consists of four postulates naming and describing the three fundamental entities Space, Force and Matter, and
    the derived phenomenon Energy.

    "The Particle Model of Light" defines frequency and wavelength as they
    apply to light and provides explanations of light's behaviours,
    including the result of Young's experiment.

    "Suggestions for Research includes experiments that will unequivocably contradict either particle theory or relativity theory.

    Keywords: particle theory; particle model; Young's experiment

    --------
    1 Gareth Boardman, "Addressing the conflict between Relativity and
    Quantum Theory: Models, measurement and the Markhov property", The
    Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy, vol 9, no 2, 2013.

    If requested, I'll post the whole thing here. It totals about 200 lines.

    http://www.users.on.net/~nedlatham/Science/Physics/index.html

    ========================
    yes indeed
    we have to understand
    that
    mass is the creator of all forces !!
    indeed revolutionary
    if you have questions just ask
    =
    TIA
    Y.Porat
    ==============

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From poraty4@gmail.com@21:1/5 to por...@gmail.com on Mon Jan 27 03:23:01 2020
    On Wednesday, December 25, 2019 at 6:02:40 PM UTC+2, por...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Monday, November 25, 2019 at 5:20:12 AM UTC+2, Ned Latham wrote:
    Abstract: "Twenty-first century science faces a dilemma: two of its well-verified foundation stones, relativity and quantum theory, have
    proven inconsistent. Resolution of the conflict has resisted
    improvements in experimental precision leaving some to believe that some fundamental understanding in our world view may need modification or
    even radical reform."[1]

    The view taken here is that the problem dates back to the nineteenth century, when Thomas Young conducted an experiment that was seen as definitively contradicting the particle model of light, and Henri
    Bequerel discovered the photovoltaic effect, which was seen as
    definitively contradicting the wave model of light. The need for a
    model consistent with both results led eventually to Einstein's theory
    of Special Relativity and thence to the present dilemma. Recognition
    that there is a particulate explanation for the result of Young's experiment solves the dilemma instantly: relativity theory is
    superfluous.

    "The Particle Theory of Matter" consists of four postulates naming and describing the three fundamental entities Space, Force and Matter, and
    the derived phenomenon Energy.

    "The Particle Model of Light" defines frequency and wavelength as they apply to light and provides explanations of light's behaviours,
    including the result of Young's experiment.

    "Suggestions for Research includes experiments that will unequivocably contradict either particle theory or relativity theory.

    Keywords: particle theory; particle model; Young's experiment

    --------
    1 Gareth Boardman, "Addressing the conflict between Relativity and
    Quantum Theory: Models, measurement and the Markhov property", The
    Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy, vol 9, no 2, 2013.

    If requested, I'll post the whole thing here. It totals about 200 lines.

    http://www.users.on.net/~nedlatham/Science/Physics/index.html

    ========================
    yes indeed
    we have to understand
    that
    mass is the creator of all forces !!
    indeed revolutionary
    if you have questions just ask
    =
    TIA
    Y.Porat
    ==============

    and mass
    is the fundamental matter as well
    ==================
    Y.P
    ===============

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)