• =?UTF-8?Q?Can_a_=E2=80=9CSchwarzschild_Vector=E2=80=9D_give_the_Schwarz

    From chemguy@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jun 27 11:02:03 2019
    A vector of “incremental distance” (in 4D) has a change of direction with no change of magnitude.

    A component of incremental distance may be associated with a component of acceleration.

    This is the “Schwarzschild vector”.

    Simple transformation should give the Schwarzschild metric.

    Reference;
    http://newstuff77.weebly.com 31 The Schwarzschild Vector

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From margaretporat@gmail.com@21:1/5 to chemguy on Fri Jun 28 00:21:25 2019
    On Thursday, June 27, 2019 at 9:02:04 PM UTC+3, chemguy wrote:
    A vector of “incremental distance” (in 4D) has a change of direction with no change of magnitude.

    A component of incremental distance may be associated with a component of acceleration.

    This is the “Schwartzschild vector”.

    Simple transformation should give the Schwarzschild metric.

    Reference;
    http://newstuff77.weebly.com 31 The Schwarzschild Vector

    ============================
    Schwarzscild
    can boggle
    only its own balls !!!
    because
    space is not curved and not schmerved !!!
    space is nothing and can do ** nothing!

    ========================================
    ALL!!! FORCES ARE DONE/CREATED BY MASS** =========================================
    historic copyright

    Eng
    Y.Porat
    ============================

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tom Roberts@21:1/5 to margaretporat@gmail.com on Fri Jun 28 18:11:16 2019
    On 6/28/19 2:21 AM, margaretporat@gmail.com wrote:
    ALL!!! FORCES ARE DONE/CREATED BY MASS**

    You keep claiming that. But we KNOW that equal-mass particles with
    different charges experience VERY different electromagnetic forces. So
    there is CLEARLY more involved than you claim.

    space is not curved

    What God whispered in your ear and told you this?

    Note that in GR it is spaceTIME that is curved, which is QUITE
    different. Note also that to claim "space is not curved" you are
    ASSUMING Euclidean geometry -- with no more justification than an
    assumption of Lorentzian geometry. But the latter has CONSIDERABLE
    experimental support that the former lacks.

    Just making bald-faced assertions like that is not useful. To be useful
    you must construct a complete theory around your claims, and provide experimental evidence that the world we inhabit behaves as your theory predicts. To be believed in the physics community, your new theory must
    be better than existing ones, or provide some other benefit.

    Tom Roberts

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From margaretporat@gmail.com@21:1/5 to Tom Roberts on Fri Jun 28 17:10:38 2019
    On Saturday, June 29, 2019 at 2:11:22 AM UTC+3, Tom Roberts wrote:
    On 6/28/19 2:21 AM, margaretporat@gmail.com wrote:
    ALL!!! FORCES ARE DONE/CREATED BY MASS**

    You keep claiming that. But we KNOW that equal-mass particles with
    different charges experience VERY different electromagnetic forces. So
    there is CLEARLY more involved than you claim.

    space is not curved

    What God whispered in your ear and told you this?

    Note that in GR it is spaceTIME that is curved, which is QUITE
    different. Note also that to claim "space is not curved" you are
    ASSUMING Euclidean geometry -- with no more justification than an
    assumption of Lorentzian geometry. But the latter has CONSIDERABLE experimental support that the former lacks.

    Just making bald-faced assertions like that is not useful. To be useful
    you must construct a complete theory around your claims, and provide experimental evidence that the world we inhabit behaves as your theory predicts. To be believed in the physics community, your new theory must
    be better than existing ones, or provide some other benefit.

    Tom Roberts
    =============================
    than you !!

    now please note that even you understand that net space
    can do nothing unless
    THERE IS SOMETHING ELSE IN IT !!

    if you will say that it includes**mass** (that can move
    or emit say sort of gravitons
    then it is a different ***story''
    because ============================================================================ MASS (or mass in movement) IS THE CREATOR OF ALL FORCES -INCLUDING GRAVITY !!!
    ============================================================================= =================================================================
    while the main actor here =is mass (and not space by itself =================================================================
    space by itself cannot do anything
    not active and not even passive !!

    TIA
    Y.Porat
    ===============

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tom Roberts@21:1/5 to margaretporat@gmail.com on Sat Jun 29 10:28:29 2019
    On 6/28/19 7:10 PM, margaretporat@gmail.com wrote:
    [...]

    When you construct a theory, and compare to experiment, I'll listen.

    But just making wild, unsupported assertions is neither useful nor
    interesting.

    Tom Roberts

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From margaretporat@gmail.com@21:1/5 to Tom Roberts on Sat Jun 29 23:59:47 2019
    On Saturday, June 29, 2019 at 6:28:35 PM UTC+3, Tom Roberts wrote:
    On 6/28/19 7:10 PM, margaretporat@gmail.com wrote:
    [...]

    When you construct a theory, and compare to experiment, I'll listen.

    But just making wild, unsupported assertions is neither useful nor interesting.

    Tom Roberts

    ======================
    before dumb calculation
    there must stand
    a sound logic PHYSICAL MODEL
    physics is not mathematics
    it is first is all
    a physics insight and understanding
    i am in physics more than 50 years
    trying to dtudy it and understand it
    more than 30 years
    see my model of the nuc from more than 25 years
    and realize that i am not only a talker
    i am a researcher trying to have an open mind and not just a parrot
    about 20 years of work on it
    having 3D education and practice as an engineer
    tht others DD NOT HAVE IT
    ========================================== http://sites.google.com/site/theyporatmodel/an-abstract

    TIA
    Y.P
    ==========

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From margaretporat@gmail.com@21:1/5 to margar...@gmail.com on Sun Jun 30 18:34:46 2019
    On Sunday, June 30, 2019 at 9:59:48 AM UTC+3, margar...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Saturday, June 29, 2019 at 6:28:35 PM UTC+3, Tom Roberts wrote:
    On 6/28/19 7:10 PM, margaretporat@gmail.com wrote:
    [...]

    When you construct a theory, and compare to experiment, I'll listen.

    But just making wild, unsupported assertions is neither useful nor interesting.

    Tom Roberts

    ======================
    before dumb calculation
    there must stand
    a sound logic PHYSICAL MODEL
    physics is not mathematics
    it is first is all
    a physics insight and understanding
    i am in physics more than 50 years
    trying to dtudy it and understand it
    more than 30 years
    see my model of the nuc from more than 25 years
    and realize that i am not only a talker
    i am a researcher trying to have an open mind and not just a parrot about 20 years of work on it
    having 3D education and practice as an engineer
    tht others DD NOT HAVE IT
    ========================================== http://sites.google.com/site/theyporatmodel/an-abstract

    TIA
    Y.P
    ==========
    space for itself is nothing and if so
    can do nothing
    not curved and not schmerved
    ==============================
    Y.P
    ===========

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From margaretporat@gmail.com@21:1/5 to margar...@gmail.com on Sun Jun 30 18:35:44 2019
    On Monday, July 1, 2019 at 4:34:47 AM UTC+3, margar...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Sunday, June 30, 2019 at 9:59:48 AM UTC+3, margar...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Saturday, June 29, 2019 at 6:28:35 PM UTC+3, Tom Roberts wrote:
    On 6/28/19 7:10 PM, margaretporat@gmail.com wrote:
    [...]

    When you construct a theory, and compare to experiment, I'll listen.

    But just making wild, unsupported assertions is neither useful nor interesting.

    Tom Roberts

    ======================
    before dumb calculation
    there must stand
    a sound logic PHYSICAL MODEL
    physics is not mathematics
    it is first is all
    a physics insight and understanding
    i am in physics more than 50 years
    trying to dtudy it and understand it
    more than 30 years
    see my model of the nuc from more than 25 years
    and realize that i am not only a talker
    i am a researcher trying to have an open mind and not just a parrot about 20 years of work on it
    having 3D education and practice as an engineer
    tht others DD NOT HAVE IT
    ========================================== http://sites.google.com/site/theyporatmodel/an-abstract

    TIA
    Y.P
    ==========
    space for itself is nothing and if so
    can do nothing
    not curved and not schmerved
    ==============================
    Y.P
    ===========

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From margaretporat@gmail.com@21:1/5 to Tom Roberts on Tue Jul 2 13:44:07 2019
    On Saturday, June 29, 2019 at 6:28:35 PM UTC+3, Tom Roberts wrote:
    On 6/28/19 7:10 PM, margaretporat@gmail.com wrote:
    [...]

    When you construct a theory, and compare to experiment, I'll listen.

    But just making wild, unsupported assertions is neither useful nor interesting.

    Tom Roberts
    ===========================
    my theory is

    THAT MASS IS THE MAIN''HERO'/ (actor) OF PHYSICS!

    how about that ?

    ==
    TIA
    Y.P
    ================

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tom Roberts@21:1/5 to margaretporat@gmail.com on Tue Jul 2 18:08:42 2019
    On 7/2/19 3:44 PM, margaretporat@gmail.com wrote:
    On Saturday, June 29, 2019 at 6:28:35 PM UTC+3, Tom Roberts wrote:
    On 6/28/19 7:10 PM, margaretporat@gmail.com wrote:
    [...]

    When you construct a theory, and compare to experiment, I'll listen.

    But just making wild, unsupported assertions is neither useful nor
    interesting.

    Tom Roberts
    ===========================
    my theory is
    THAT MASS IS THE MAIN''HERO'/ (actor) OF PHYSICS!
    how about that ?

    That is just a wild, unsupported assertion, with no testable
    consequences. USELESS. UNINTERESTING.

    Tom Roberts

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From margaretporat@gmail.com@21:1/5 to Tom Roberts on Tue Jul 2 20:45:38 2019
    On Wednesday, July 3, 2019 at 2:08:47 AM UTC+3, Tom Roberts wrote:
    On 7/2/19 3:44 PM, margaretporat@gmail.com wrote:
    On Saturday, June 29, 2019 at 6:28:35 PM UTC+3, Tom Roberts wrote:
    On 6/28/19 7:10 PM, margaretporat@gmail.com wrote:
    [...]

    When you construct a theory, and compare to experiment, I'll listen.

    But just making wild, unsupported assertions is neither useful nor
    interesting.

    Tom Roberts
    ===========================
    my theory is
    THAT MASS IS THE MAIN''HERO'/ (actor) OF PHYSICS!
    how about that ?

    That is just a wild, unsupported assertion, with no testable
    consequences. USELESS. UNINTERESTING.

    Tom Roberts
    =======================
    see
    the Michel Faraday with his historic experiment
    with a permanent magnet
    it was 100 years ago
    and yet no one was cleaver bough to appreciate its revolution in science
    even Faraday himself could not appreciate at his time
    similarly as well
    while he invented the first electricity generator
    even he could not appreciate the historic revolution** he***did ??

    ATB
    Eng
    Yehiel Porat
    ========================

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From poraty4@gmail.com@21:1/5 to margar...@gmail.com on Wed Jul 3 02:25:38 2019
    On Wednesday, July 3, 2019 at 6:45:39 AM UTC+3, margar...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Wednesday, July 3, 2019 at 2:08:47 AM UTC+3, Tom Roberts wrote:
    On 7/2/19 3:44 PM, margaretporat@gmail.com wrote:
    On Saturday, June 29, 2019 at 6:28:35 PM UTC+3, Tom Roberts wrote:
    On 6/28/19 7:10 PM, margaretporat@gmail.com wrote:
    [...]

    When you construct a theory, and compare to experiment, I'll listen.

    But just making wild, unsupported assertions is neither useful nor
    interesting.

    Tom Roberts
    ===========================
    my theory is
    THAT MASS IS THE MAIN''HERO'/ (actor) OF PHYSICS!
    how about that ?

    That is just a wild, unsupported assertion, with no testable
    consequences. USELESS. UNINTERESTING.

    Tom Roberts
    =======================
    see
    the Michel Faraday with his historic experiment
    with a permanent magnet
    it was 100 years ago
    and yet no one was cleaver bough to appreciate its revolution in science
    even Faraday himself could not appreciate at his time
    similarly as well
    while he invented the first electricity generator
    even he could not appreciate the historic revolution** he***did ??

    ATB
    Eng
    Yehiel Porat
    ========================
    in that Faraday experiment
    human beigs could for the fist time
    see
    force lines sourcing out from a'dead ''iron
    curved force lines force lines are sort of curving around the iron pea coming back to it endlessly !!
    gravity
    is something alike it
    see my circlon mechanism
    at my site
    while i was suggesting it (more than 25 years ago !!!
    the Faraday experiment was not in my mind at all !!
    you can see it in the appendix of my site

    http://sites.google.com/site/theyporatmodel/an-abstract
    TIA
    Y.P
    ==================
    Y.P
    =======================

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From poraty4@gmail.com@21:1/5 to por...@gmail.com on Thu Jul 4 23:21:24 2019
    On Wednesday, July 3, 2019 at 12:25:39 PM UTC+3, por...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Wednesday, July 3, 2019 at 6:45:39 AM UTC+3, margar...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Wednesday, July 3, 2019 at 2:08:47 AM UTC+3, Tom Roberts wrote:
    On 7/2/19 3:44 PM, margaretporat@gmail.com wrote:
    On Saturday, June 29, 2019 at 6:28:35 PM UTC+3, Tom Roberts wrote:
    On 6/28/19 7:10 PM, margaretporat@gmail.com wrote:
    [...]

    When you construct a theory, and compare to experiment, I'll listen. >>
    But just making wild, unsupported assertions is neither useful nor
    interesting.

    Tom Roberts
    ===========================
    my theory is
    THAT MASS IS THE MAIN''HERO'/ (actor) OF PHYSICS!
    how about that ?

    That is just a wild, unsupported assertion, with no testable consequences. USELESS. UNINTERESTING.

    Tom Roberts
    =======================
    see
    the Michel Faraday with his historic experiment
    with a permanent magnet
    it was 100 years ago
    and yet no one was cleaver bough to appreciate its revolution in science even Faraday himself could not appreciate at his time
    similarly as well
    while he invented the first electricity generator
    even he could not appreciate the historic revolution** he***did ??

    ATB
    Eng
    Yehiel Porat
    ========================
    in that Faraday experiment
    human beigs could for the fist time
    see
    force lines sourcing out from a'dead ''iron
    curved force lines force lines are sort of curving around the iron pea coming back to it endlessly !!
    gravity
    is something alike it
    see my circlon mechanism
    at my site
    while i was suggesting it (more than 25 years ago !!!
    the Faraday experiment was not in my mind at all !!
    you can see it in the appendix of my site

    http://sites.google.com/site/theyporatmodel/an-abstract
    TIA
    Y.P
    ==================
    Y.P
    =======================
    Mr Roberts
    what new can we lean from the above Faraday experiment ??

    TIA
    Y.Porat
    ==========================

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From poraty4@gmail.com@21:1/5 to por...@gmail.com on Sun Jul 7 16:14:04 2019
    On Friday, July 5, 2019 at 9:21:25 AM UTC+3, por...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Wednesday, July 3, 2019 at 12:25:39 PM UTC+3, por...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Wednesday, July 3, 2019 at 6:45:39 AM UTC+3, margar...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Wednesday, July 3, 2019 at 2:08:47 AM UTC+3, Tom Roberts wrote:
    On 7/2/19 3:44 PM, margaretporat@gmail.com wrote:
    On Saturday, June 29, 2019 at 6:28:35 PM UTC+3, Tom Roberts wrote:
    On 6/28/19 7:10 PM, margaretporat@gmail.com wrote:
    [...]

    When you construct a theory, and compare to experiment, I'll listen. >>
    But just making wild, unsupported assertions is neither useful nor >> interesting.

    Tom Roberts
    ===========================
    my theory is
    THAT MASS IS THE MAIN''HERO'/ (actor) OF PHYSICS!
    how about that ?

    That is just a wild, unsupported assertion, with no testable consequences. USELESS. UNINTERESTING.

    Tom Roberts
    =======================
    see
    the Michel Faraday with his historic experiment
    with a permanent magnet
    it was 100 years ago
    and yet no one was cleaver bough to appreciate its revolution in science even Faraday himself could not appreciate at his time
    similarly as well
    while he invented the first electricity generator
    even he could not appreciate the historic revolution** he***did ??

    ATB
    Eng
    Yehiel Porat
    ========================
    in that Faraday experiment
    human beigs could for the fist time
    see
    force lines sourcing out from a'dead ''iron
    curved force lines force lines are sort of curving around the iron pea coming back to it endlessly !!
    gravity
    is something alike it
    see my circlon mechanism
    at my site
    while i was suggesting it (more than 25 years ago !!!
    the Faraday experiment was not in my mind at all !!
    you can see it in the appendix of my site

    http://sites.google.com/site/theyporatmodel/an-abstract
    TIA
    Y.P
    ==================
    Y.P
    =======================
    Mr Roberts
    what new can we lean from the above Faraday experiment ??

    TIA
    Y.Porat
    ==========================
    no reply is as well a reply
    yet
    the Faraday experiment was the first hint to us
    that process are done by mass
    in a way that most of us
    still do not understand

    TIA
    Y.P
    =====================

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From libra_spirit@hotmail.com@21:1/5 to chemguy on Wed Jul 17 20:29:50 2019
    On Thursday, June 27, 2019 at 10:02:04 AM UTC-8, chemguy wrote:
    A vector of “incremental distance” (in 4D) has a change of direction with no change of magnitude.

    A component of incremental distance may be associated with a component of acceleration.

    This is the “Schwarzschild vector”.

    Simple transformation should give the Schwarzschild metric.

    Reference;
    http://newstuff77.weebly.com 31 The Schwarzschild Vector

    -------------------------------------------

    Here is an experiment to bring up an isotope field coherence around a copper pipe. All that is used is a spatial distance tuned into, by using a stainless steel caliper. Do this experiemnt, and then decide if vibration fields exist in the space fabric.

    Experiment:
    A copper pipe or tube, length from 6 inch to about 1 foot can be used to demonstrate this effect.
    The power of this field will depend on the mass of the copper pipe.
    A coherent Isotope field will be raised up from the copper pipe, and can be felt around it.
    Two stainless steel calipers are used to inject the field on the pipe, and then to flip the field over.
    The calipers must be accurate to .01 mm.
    Once injected the field will self sustain, and must be taken down using a different caliper setting of 1/9x.
    This experiment can also be done using a special type of coil system at very low power levels.

    Here is the experiment:

    Experimental Proof of Isotope Resonance

    In order to show the calculations are sound, I am sharing a post from the V2EM site.
    SSF = Self Sustaining Field, these fields can be palmed using a finger or hand around the active metal tubes or pipes.

    -------------------------------------------------------

    Setting up a conical field on copper pipes and tubes.

    Caliper => 92.71 mm

    Hold the pipe or tube with it's center of mass in the caliper gap at 90 deg, SSF comes up with wide ends of the field on the ends of the pipe [ Dual Cones ].

    Caliper 2 => 92.71 mm

    Touch both calipers to both ends of the pipe simultaneously, field flips [ Football Shape ]. Wide field at center of tube two compression nodes on each end.

    Caliper => 10.30 mm

    Touch on the compression nodes on the tube to take the field down.

    Clear out residuals using a magnet, if there are any present.

    This is but one fractal dimension that is possible, taken directly from the spreadsheets below.

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Electric Field injection Electron shell vibration

    Caliper => 49.43 mm

    Touch the pipe anywhere. The field will be uniform everywhere on the copper medium, and feel electric.

    Caliper => 5.49 mm

    Touch the tube anywhere, the field should come down

    Clear any residuals with a magnet

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    If any want I can provide the method of calculations to produce this effect in various materials.

    Dave L

    2019 - 7 - 6

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From poraty4@gmail.com@21:1/5 to libra_...@hotmail.com on Wed Jul 31 08:36:09 2019
    On Thursday, July 18, 2019 at 6:29:52 AM UTC+3, libra_...@hotmail.com wrote:
    On Thursday, June 27, 2019 at 10:02:04 AM UTC-8, chemguy wrote:
    A vector of “incremental distance” (in 4D) has a change of direction with no change of magnitude.

    A component of incremental distance may be associated with a component of acceleration.

    This is the “Schwarzschild vector”.

    Simple transformation should give the Schwarzschild metric.

    Reference;
    http://newstuff77.weebly.com 31 The Schwarzschild Vector

    -------------------------------------------

    Here is an experiment to bring up an isotope field coherence around a copper pipe. All that is used is a spatial distance tuned into, by using a stainless steel caliper. Do this experiemnt, and then decide if vibration fields exist in the space fabric.

    Experiment:
    A copper pipe or tube, length from 6 inch to about 1 foot can be used to demonstrate this effect.
    The power of this field will depend on the mass of the copper pipe.
    A coherent Isotope field will be raised up from the copper pipe, and can be felt around it.
    Two stainless steel calipers are used to inject the field on the pipe, and then to flip the field over.
    The calipers must be accurate to .01 mm.
    Once injected the field will self sustain, and must be taken down using a different caliper setting of 1/9x.
    This experiment can also be done using a special type of coil system at very low power levels.

    Here is the experiment:

    Experimental Proof of Isotope Resonance

    In order to show the calculations are sound, I am sharing a post from the V2EM site.
    SSF = Self Sustaining Field, these fields can be palmed using a finger or hand around the active metal tubes or pipes.

    -------------------------------------------------------

    Setting up a conical field on copper pipes and tubes.

    Caliper => 92.71 mm

    Hold the pipe or tube with it's center of mass in the caliper gap at 90 deg, SSF comes up with wide ends of the field on the ends of the pipe [ Dual Cones ].

    Caliper 2 => 92.71 mm

    Touch both calipers to both ends of the pipe simultaneously, field flips [ Football Shape ]. Wide field at center of tube two compression nodes on each end.

    Caliper => 10.30 mm

    Touch on the compression nodes on the tube to take the field down.

    Clear out residuals using a magnet, if there are any present.

    This is but one fractal dimension that is possible, taken directly from the spreadsheets below.

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Electric Field injection Electron shell vibration

    Caliper => 49.43 mm

    Touch the pipe anywhere. The field will be uniform everywhere on the copper medium, and feel electric.

    Caliper => 5.49 mm

    Touch the tube anywhere, the field should come down

    Clear any residuals with a magnet

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    If any want I can provide the method of calculations to produce this effect in various materials.

    Dave L

    2019 - 7 - 6
    ========
    ??
    do you want to say
    mass is/can create some forces ??


    TIA
    Y.P
    ========================

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From poraty4@gmail.com@21:1/5 to libra_...@hotmail.com on Sat Aug 31 23:37:42 2019
    On Thursday, July 18, 2019 at 6:29:52 AM UTC+3, libra_...@hotmail.com wrote:
    On Thursday, June 27, 2019 at 10:02:04 AM UTC-8, chemguy wrote:
    A vector of “incremental distance” (in 4D) has a change of direction with no change of magnitude.

    A component of incremental distance may be associated with a component of acceleration.

    This is the “Schwarzschild vector”.

    Simple transformation should give the Schwarzschild metric.

    Reference;
    http://newstuff77.weebly.com 31 The Schwarzschild Vector

    -------------------------------------------

    Here is an experiment to bring up an isotope field coherence around a copper pipe. All that is used is a spatial distance tuned into, by using a stainless steel caliper. Do this experiemnt, and then decide if vibration fields exist in the space fabric.

    Experiment:
    A copper pipe or tube, length from 6 inch to about 1 foot can be used to demonstrate this effect.
    The power of this field will depend on the mass of the copper pipe.
    A coherent Isotope field will be raised up from the copper pipe, and can be felt around it.
    Two stainless steel calipers are used to inject the field on the pipe, and then to flip the field over.
    The calipers must be accurate to .01 mm.
    Once injected the field will self sustain, and must be taken down using a different caliper setting of 1/9x.
    This experiment can also be done using a special type of coil system at very low power levels.

    Here is the experiment:

    Experimental Proof of Isotope Resonance

    In order to show the calculations are sound, I am sharing a post from the V2EM site.
    SSF = Self Sustaining Field, these fields can be palmed using a finger or hand around the active metal tubes or pipes.

    -------------------------------------------------------

    Setting up a conical field on copper pipes and tubes.

    Caliper => 92.71 mm

    Hold the pipe or tube with it's center of mass in the caliper gap at 90 deg, SSF comes up with wide ends of the field on the ends of the pipe [ Dual Cones ].

    Caliper 2 => 92.71 mm

    Touch both calipers to both ends of the pipe simultaneously, field flips [ Football Shape ]. Wide field at center of tube two compression nodes on each end.

    Caliper => 10.30 mm

    Touch on the compression nodes on the tube to take the field down.

    Clear out residuals using a magnet, if there are any present.

    This is but one fractal dimension that is possible, taken directly from the spreadsheets below.

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Electric Field injection Electron shell vibration

    Caliper => 49.43 mm

    Touch the pipe anywhere. The field will be uniform everywhere on the copper medium, and feel electric.

    Caliper => 5.49 mm

    Touch the tube anywhere, the field should come down

    Clear any residuals with a magnet

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    If any want I can provide the method of calculations to produce this effect in various materials.

    Dave L

    2019 - 7 - 6
    ===========================
    too complicated
    makes me suspicious
    and can you make it much simpler ?
    ie to emphasis the main points ??
    -----
    IA
    Y.P
    ==============



    +++

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Lowrance@21:1/5 to All on Sun Sep 1 15:44:56 2019
    It is very simple to calculate these fields, and you do not need to use any magnetic field data at all for the NMR calculator.

    If you know the resonant frequency of the background field, you plug that into the NMR calculator for H1, and then can derive the resonance vibration for any Isotope on the NMR chart.

    How is that complicted? It works.

    A field comes up around your pipe or tube, and you can feel it is more dense then the background field all around it.

    Dave L

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From poraty4@gmail.com@21:1/5 to David Lowrance on Thu Sep 5 22:40:25 2019
    On Monday, September 2, 2019 at 1:44:58 AM UTC+3, David Lowrance wrote:
    It is very simple to calculate these fields, and you do not need to use any magnetic field data at all for the NMR calculator.

    If you know the resonant frequency of the background field, you plug that into the NMR calculator for H1, and then can derive the resonance vibration for any Isotope on the NMR chart.

    How is that complicted? It works.

    A field comes up around your pipe or tube, and you can feel it is more dense then the background field all around it.

    Dave L
    ============================
    what has all that to do with
    schoolchild and curved space
    it seems that the machine is curved
    not space !!??
    ===
    TIA
    Y.P
    =======================

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)