A vector of “incremental distance” (in 4D) has a change of direction with no change of magnitude.
A component of incremental distance may be associated with a component of acceleration.
This is the “Schwartzschild vector”.
Simple transformation should give the Schwarzschild metric.
Reference;
http://newstuff77.weebly.com 31 The Schwarzschild Vector
ALL!!! FORCES ARE DONE/CREATED BY MASS**
space is not curved
On 6/28/19 2:21 AM, margaretporat@gmail.com wrote:=============================
ALL!!! FORCES ARE DONE/CREATED BY MASS**
You keep claiming that. But we KNOW that equal-mass particles with
different charges experience VERY different electromagnetic forces. So
there is CLEARLY more involved than you claim.
space is not curved
What God whispered in your ear and told you this?
Note that in GR it is spaceTIME that is curved, which is QUITE
different. Note also that to claim "space is not curved" you are
ASSUMING Euclidean geometry -- with no more justification than an
assumption of Lorentzian geometry. But the latter has CONSIDERABLE experimental support that the former lacks.
Just making bald-faced assertions like that is not useful. To be useful
you must construct a complete theory around your claims, and provide experimental evidence that the world we inhabit behaves as your theory predicts. To be believed in the physics community, your new theory must
be better than existing ones, or provide some other benefit.
Tom Roberts
[...]
On 6/28/19 7:10 PM, margaretporat@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
When you construct a theory, and compare to experiment, I'll listen.
But just making wild, unsupported assertions is neither useful nor interesting.
Tom Roberts
On Saturday, June 29, 2019 at 6:28:35 PM UTC+3, Tom Roberts wrote:space for itself is nothing and if so
On 6/28/19 7:10 PM, margaretporat@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
When you construct a theory, and compare to experiment, I'll listen.
But just making wild, unsupported assertions is neither useful nor interesting.
Tom Roberts
======================
before dumb calculation
there must stand
a sound logic PHYSICAL MODEL
physics is not mathematics
it is first is all
a physics insight and understanding
i am in physics more than 50 years
trying to dtudy it and understand it
more than 30 years
see my model of the nuc from more than 25 years
and realize that i am not only a talker
i am a researcher trying to have an open mind and not just a parrot about 20 years of work on it
having 3D education and practice as an engineer
tht others DD NOT HAVE IT
========================================== http://sites.google.com/site/theyporatmodel/an-abstract
TIA
Y.P
==========
On Sunday, June 30, 2019 at 9:59:48 AM UTC+3, margar...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, June 29, 2019 at 6:28:35 PM UTC+3, Tom Roberts wrote:
On 6/28/19 7:10 PM, margaretporat@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
When you construct a theory, and compare to experiment, I'll listen.
But just making wild, unsupported assertions is neither useful nor interesting.
Tom Roberts
======================
before dumb calculation
there must stand
a sound logic PHYSICAL MODEL
physics is not mathematics
it is first is all
a physics insight and understanding
i am in physics more than 50 years
trying to dtudy it and understand it
more than 30 years
see my model of the nuc from more than 25 years
and realize that i am not only a talker
i am a researcher trying to have an open mind and not just a parrot about 20 years of work on it
having 3D education and practice as an engineer
tht others DD NOT HAVE IT
========================================== http://sites.google.com/site/theyporatmodel/an-abstract
TIAspace for itself is nothing and if so
Y.P
==========
can do nothing
not curved and not schmerved
==============================
Y.P
===========
On 6/28/19 7:10 PM, margaretporat@gmail.com wrote:===========================
[...]
When you construct a theory, and compare to experiment, I'll listen.
But just making wild, unsupported assertions is neither useful nor interesting.
Tom Roberts
On Saturday, June 29, 2019 at 6:28:35 PM UTC+3, Tom Roberts wrote:
On 6/28/19 7:10 PM, margaretporat@gmail.com wrote:===========================
[...]
When you construct a theory, and compare to experiment, I'll listen.
But just making wild, unsupported assertions is neither useful nor
interesting.
Tom Roberts
my theory is
THAT MASS IS THE MAIN''HERO'/ (actor) OF PHYSICS!
how about that ?
On 7/2/19 3:44 PM, margaretporat@gmail.com wrote:=======================
On Saturday, June 29, 2019 at 6:28:35 PM UTC+3, Tom Roberts wrote:
On 6/28/19 7:10 PM, margaretporat@gmail.com wrote:===========================
[...]
When you construct a theory, and compare to experiment, I'll listen.
But just making wild, unsupported assertions is neither useful nor
interesting.
Tom Roberts
my theory is
THAT MASS IS THE MAIN''HERO'/ (actor) OF PHYSICS!
how about that ?
That is just a wild, unsupported assertion, with no testable
consequences. USELESS. UNINTERESTING.
Tom Roberts
On Wednesday, July 3, 2019 at 2:08:47 AM UTC+3, Tom Roberts wrote:in that Faraday experiment
On 7/2/19 3:44 PM, margaretporat@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, June 29, 2019 at 6:28:35 PM UTC+3, Tom Roberts wrote:
On 6/28/19 7:10 PM, margaretporat@gmail.com wrote:===========================
[...]
When you construct a theory, and compare to experiment, I'll listen.
But just making wild, unsupported assertions is neither useful nor
interesting.
Tom Roberts
my theory is
THAT MASS IS THE MAIN''HERO'/ (actor) OF PHYSICS!
how about that ?
That is just a wild, unsupported assertion, with no testable
consequences. USELESS. UNINTERESTING.
Tom Roberts=======================
see
the Michel Faraday with his historic experiment
with a permanent magnet
it was 100 years ago
and yet no one was cleaver bough to appreciate its revolution in science
even Faraday himself could not appreciate at his time
similarly as well
while he invented the first electricity generator
even he could not appreciate the historic revolution** he***did ??
ATB
Eng
Yehiel Porat
========================
On Wednesday, July 3, 2019 at 6:45:39 AM UTC+3, margar...@gmail.com wrote:Mr Roberts
On Wednesday, July 3, 2019 at 2:08:47 AM UTC+3, Tom Roberts wrote:
On 7/2/19 3:44 PM, margaretporat@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, June 29, 2019 at 6:28:35 PM UTC+3, Tom Roberts wrote:
On 6/28/19 7:10 PM, margaretporat@gmail.com wrote:===========================
[...]
When you construct a theory, and compare to experiment, I'll listen. >>
But just making wild, unsupported assertions is neither useful nor
interesting.
Tom Roberts
my theory is
THAT MASS IS THE MAIN''HERO'/ (actor) OF PHYSICS!
how about that ?
That is just a wild, unsupported assertion, with no testable consequences. USELESS. UNINTERESTING.
Tom Roberts=======================
see
the Michel Faraday with his historic experiment
with a permanent magnet
it was 100 years ago
and yet no one was cleaver bough to appreciate its revolution in science even Faraday himself could not appreciate at his time
similarly as well
while he invented the first electricity generator
even he could not appreciate the historic revolution** he***did ??
ATBin that Faraday experiment
Eng
Yehiel Porat
========================
human beigs could for the fist time
see
force lines sourcing out from a'dead ''iron
curved force lines force lines are sort of curving around the iron pea coming back to it endlessly !!
gravity
is something alike it
see my circlon mechanism
at my site
while i was suggesting it (more than 25 years ago !!!
the Faraday experiment was not in my mind at all !!
you can see it in the appendix of my site
http://sites.google.com/site/theyporatmodel/an-abstract
TIA
Y.P
==================
Y.P
=======================
On Wednesday, July 3, 2019 at 12:25:39 PM UTC+3, por...@gmail.com wrote:no reply is as well a reply
On Wednesday, July 3, 2019 at 6:45:39 AM UTC+3, margar...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday, July 3, 2019 at 2:08:47 AM UTC+3, Tom Roberts wrote:
On 7/2/19 3:44 PM, margaretporat@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, June 29, 2019 at 6:28:35 PM UTC+3, Tom Roberts wrote:
On 6/28/19 7:10 PM, margaretporat@gmail.com wrote:===========================
[...]
When you construct a theory, and compare to experiment, I'll listen. >>
But just making wild, unsupported assertions is neither useful nor >> interesting.
Tom Roberts
my theory is
THAT MASS IS THE MAIN''HERO'/ (actor) OF PHYSICS!
how about that ?
That is just a wild, unsupported assertion, with no testable consequences. USELESS. UNINTERESTING.
Tom Roberts=======================
see
the Michel Faraday with his historic experiment
with a permanent magnet
it was 100 years ago
and yet no one was cleaver bough to appreciate its revolution in science even Faraday himself could not appreciate at his time
similarly as well
while he invented the first electricity generator
even he could not appreciate the historic revolution** he***did ??
ATBin that Faraday experiment
Eng
Yehiel Porat
========================
human beigs could for the fist time
see
force lines sourcing out from a'dead ''iron
curved force lines force lines are sort of curving around the iron pea coming back to it endlessly !!
gravity
is something alike it
see my circlon mechanism
at my site
while i was suggesting it (more than 25 years ago !!!
the Faraday experiment was not in my mind at all !!
you can see it in the appendix of my site
http://sites.google.com/site/theyporatmodel/an-abstractMr Roberts
TIA
Y.P
==================
Y.P
=======================
what new can we lean from the above Faraday experiment ??
TIA
Y.Porat
==========================
A vector of “incremental distance” (in 4D) has a change of direction with no change of magnitude.
A component of incremental distance may be associated with a component of acceleration.
This is the “Schwarzschild vector”.
Simple transformation should give the Schwarzschild metric.
Reference;
http://newstuff77.weebly.com 31 The Schwarzschild Vector
On Thursday, June 27, 2019 at 10:02:04 AM UTC-8, chemguy wrote:========
A vector of “incremental distance” (in 4D) has a change of direction with no change of magnitude.
A component of incremental distance may be associated with a component of acceleration.
This is the “Schwarzschild vector”.
Simple transformation should give the Schwarzschild metric.
Reference;
http://newstuff77.weebly.com 31 The Schwarzschild Vector
-------------------------------------------
Here is an experiment to bring up an isotope field coherence around a copper pipe. All that is used is a spatial distance tuned into, by using a stainless steel caliper. Do this experiemnt, and then decide if vibration fields exist in the space fabric.
Experiment:
A copper pipe or tube, length from 6 inch to about 1 foot can be used to demonstrate this effect.
The power of this field will depend on the mass of the copper pipe.
A coherent Isotope field will be raised up from the copper pipe, and can be felt around it.
Two stainless steel calipers are used to inject the field on the pipe, and then to flip the field over.
The calipers must be accurate to .01 mm.
Once injected the field will self sustain, and must be taken down using a different caliper setting of 1/9x.
This experiment can also be done using a special type of coil system at very low power levels.
Here is the experiment:
Experimental Proof of Isotope Resonance
In order to show the calculations are sound, I am sharing a post from the V2EM site.
SSF = Self Sustaining Field, these fields can be palmed using a finger or hand around the active metal tubes or pipes.
-------------------------------------------------------
Setting up a conical field on copper pipes and tubes.
Caliper => 92.71 mm
Hold the pipe or tube with it's center of mass in the caliper gap at 90 deg, SSF comes up with wide ends of the field on the ends of the pipe [ Dual Cones ].
Caliper 2 => 92.71 mm
Touch both calipers to both ends of the pipe simultaneously, field flips [ Football Shape ]. Wide field at center of tube two compression nodes on each end.
Caliper => 10.30 mm
Touch on the compression nodes on the tube to take the field down.
Clear out residuals using a magnet, if there are any present.
This is but one fractal dimension that is possible, taken directly from the spreadsheets below.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Electric Field injection Electron shell vibration
Caliper => 49.43 mm
Touch the pipe anywhere. The field will be uniform everywhere on the copper medium, and feel electric.
Caliper => 5.49 mm
Touch the tube anywhere, the field should come down
Clear any residuals with a magnet
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If any want I can provide the method of calculations to produce this effect in various materials.
Dave L
2019 - 7 - 6
On Thursday, June 27, 2019 at 10:02:04 AM UTC-8, chemguy wrote:===========================
A vector of “incremental distance” (in 4D) has a change of direction with no change of magnitude.
A component of incremental distance may be associated with a component of acceleration.
This is the “Schwarzschild vector”.
Simple transformation should give the Schwarzschild metric.
Reference;
http://newstuff77.weebly.com 31 The Schwarzschild Vector
-------------------------------------------
Here is an experiment to bring up an isotope field coherence around a copper pipe. All that is used is a spatial distance tuned into, by using a stainless steel caliper. Do this experiemnt, and then decide if vibration fields exist in the space fabric.
Experiment:
A copper pipe or tube, length from 6 inch to about 1 foot can be used to demonstrate this effect.
The power of this field will depend on the mass of the copper pipe.
A coherent Isotope field will be raised up from the copper pipe, and can be felt around it.
Two stainless steel calipers are used to inject the field on the pipe, and then to flip the field over.
The calipers must be accurate to .01 mm.
Once injected the field will self sustain, and must be taken down using a different caliper setting of 1/9x.
This experiment can also be done using a special type of coil system at very low power levels.
Here is the experiment:
Experimental Proof of Isotope Resonance
In order to show the calculations are sound, I am sharing a post from the V2EM site.
SSF = Self Sustaining Field, these fields can be palmed using a finger or hand around the active metal tubes or pipes.
-------------------------------------------------------
Setting up a conical field on copper pipes and tubes.
Caliper => 92.71 mm
Hold the pipe or tube with it's center of mass in the caliper gap at 90 deg, SSF comes up with wide ends of the field on the ends of the pipe [ Dual Cones ].
Caliper 2 => 92.71 mm
Touch both calipers to both ends of the pipe simultaneously, field flips [ Football Shape ]. Wide field at center of tube two compression nodes on each end.
Caliper => 10.30 mm
Touch on the compression nodes on the tube to take the field down.
Clear out residuals using a magnet, if there are any present.
This is but one fractal dimension that is possible, taken directly from the spreadsheets below.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Electric Field injection Electron shell vibration
Caliper => 49.43 mm
Touch the pipe anywhere. The field will be uniform everywhere on the copper medium, and feel electric.
Caliper => 5.49 mm
Touch the tube anywhere, the field should come down
Clear any residuals with a magnet
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If any want I can provide the method of calculations to produce this effect in various materials.
Dave L
2019 - 7 - 6
It is very simple to calculate these fields, and you do not need to use any magnetic field data at all for the NMR calculator.============================
If you know the resonant frequency of the background field, you plug that into the NMR calculator for H1, and then can derive the resonance vibration for any Isotope on the NMR chart.
How is that complicted? It works.
A field comes up around your pipe or tube, and you can feel it is more dense then the background field all around it.
Dave L
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 285 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 24:29:35 |
Calls: | 6,448 |
Files: | 12,050 |
Messages: | 5,254,261 |