Sci.optics seems dead. Any other good places?
Someone pointed me to the DT35 distance measuring device. https://www.sick.com/us/en/distance-sensors/mid-range-distance-sensors/dx35/dt35-b15251/p/p295353
And I was wondering how it worked. (What's inside.)
George H.
Someone pointed me to the DT35 distance measuring device. https://www.sick.com/us/en/distance-sensors/mid-range-distance-sensors/dx35/dt35-b15251/p/p295353
And I was wondering how it worked. (What's inside.)
George H.
On Monday, October 2, 2017 at 7:06:01 PM UTC-4, Mike S wrote:
On 10/2/2017 8:29 AM, ggherold@gmail.com wrote:
<snip>
Someone pointed me to the DT35 distance measuring device.
https://www.sick.com/us/en/distance-sensors/mid-range-distance-sensors/dx35/dt35-b15251/p/p295353
And I was wondering how it worked. (What's inside.)
George H.
did you read this yet?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proximity_sensor
it's interesting, looking fwd to replies here.
I'm guessing they are modulating the laser beam.
The different ranges, will be different frequencies,
to match different gains (of the TIA),
as the intensity drops off.
(But I don't know.)
George H.
On 10/2/2017 8:29 AM, ggherold@gmail.com wrote:
<snip>
Someone pointed me to the DT35 distance measuring device. https://www.sick.com/us/en/distance-sensors/mid-range-distance-sensors/dx35/dt35-b15251/p/p295353
And I was wondering how it worked. (What's inside.)
George H.
did you read this yet?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proximity_sensor
it's interesting, looking fwd to replies here.
On 10/02/2017 07:53 PM, ggherold@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, October 2, 2017 at 7:06:01 PM UTC-4, Mike S wrote:
On 10/2/2017 8:29 AM, ggherold@gmail.com wrote:
<snip>
Someone pointed me to the DT35 distance measuring device.
https://www.sick.com/us/en/distance-sensors/mid-range-distance-sensors/dx35/dt35-b15251/p/p295353
And I was wondering how it worked. (What's inside.)
George H.
did you read this yet?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proximity_sensor
it's interesting, looking fwd to replies here.
I'm guessing they are modulating the laser beam.
The different ranges, will be different frequencies,
to match different gains (of the TIA),
as the intensity drops off.
(But I don't know.)
George H.
There are a lot of ways of doing this. A sawtooth waveform is the
simplest.
Cheers
Phil Hobbs
On 2017-10-03 02:33, Phil Hobbs wrote:
On 10/02/2017 07:53 PM, ggherold@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, October 2, 2017 at 7:06:01 PM UTC-4, Mike S wrote:
On 10/2/2017 8:29 AM, ggherold@gmail.com wrote:
<snip>
Someone pointed me to the DT35 distance measuring device.
https://www.sick.com/us/en/distance-sensors/mid-range-distance-sensors/dx35/dt35-b15251/p/p295353
And I was wondering how it worked. (What's inside.)
George H.
did you read this yet?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proximity_sensor
it's interesting, looking fwd to replies here.
I'm guessing they are modulating the laser beam.
The different ranges, will be different frequencies,
to match different gains (of the TIA),
as the intensity drops off.
(But I don't know.)
George H.
There are a lot of ways of doing this. A sawtooth waveform is the simplest.
Cheers
Phil Hobbs
It's not a simple proximity sensor. The datasheet says it
sends 3ns red laser pulses with a 1/250 duty cycle. They must
measure the echo return time, I suppose.
Jeroen Belleman
On Tuesday, October 3, 2017 at 4:16:40 AM UTC-4, Jeroen Belleman wrote:
On 2017-10-03 02:33, Phil Hobbs wrote:
On 10/02/2017 07:53 PM, ggherold@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, October 2, 2017 at 7:06:01 PM UTC-4, Mike S wrote:
On 10/2/2017 8:29 AM, ggherold@gmail.com wrote:
<snip>
Someone pointed me to the DT35 distance measuring device.
https://www.sick.com/us/en/distance-sensors/mid-range-distance-sensors/dx35/dt35-b15251/p/p295353
And I was wondering how it worked. (What's inside.)
George H.
did you read this yet?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proximity_sensor
it's interesting, looking fwd to replies here.
I'm guessing they are modulating the laser beam.
The different ranges, will be different frequencies,
to match different gains (of the TIA),
as the intensity drops off.
(But I don't know.)
George H.
There are a lot of ways of doing this. A sawtooth waveform is the
simplest.
Cheers
Phil Hobbs
It's not a simple proximity sensor. The datasheet says it
sends 3ns red laser pulses with a 1/250 duty cycle. They must
measure the echo return time, I suppose.
Jeroen Belleman
Jeroen, I couldn't find a data sheet. I did see some spec that claimed
~1mm resolution ~ 1 ps timing.. or something else.
George H.
On Tuesday, October 3, 2017 at 4:16:40 AM UTC-4, Jeroen Belleman wrote:
On 2017-10-03 02:33, Phil Hobbs wrote:
On 10/02/2017 07:53 PM, ggherold@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, October 2, 2017 at 7:06:01 PM UTC-4, Mike S wrote:
On 10/2/2017 8:29 AM, ggherold@gmail.com wrote:
<snip>
Someone pointed me to the DT35 distance measuring device.
https://www.sick.com/us/en/distance-sensors/mid-range-distance-sensors/dx35/dt35-b15251/p/p295353
And I was wondering how it worked. (What's inside.)
George H.
did you read this yet?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proximity_sensor
it's interesting, looking fwd to replies here.
I'm guessing they are modulating the laser beam.
The different ranges, will be different frequencies,
to match different gains (of the TIA),
as the intensity drops off.
(But I don't know.)
George H.
There are a lot of ways of doing this. A sawtooth waveform is the
simplest.
Cheers
Phil Hobbs
It's not a simple proximity sensor. The datasheet says it
sends 3ns red laser pulses with a 1/250 duty cycle. They must
measure the echo return time, I suppose.
Jeroen Belleman
Jeroen, I couldn't find a data sheet. I did see some spec that claimed
~1mm resolution ~ 1 ps timing.. or something else.
On Monday, October 2, 2017 at 7:06:01 PM UTC-4, Mike S wrote:
On 10/2/2017 8:29 AM, ggherold@gmail.com wrote:
<snip>
Someone pointed me to the DT35 distance measuring device.
And I was wondering how it worked. (What's inside.)
I'm guessing they are modulating the laser beam.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 292 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 206:07:50 |
Calls: | 6,618 |
Calls today: | 2 |
Files: | 12,168 |
Messages: | 5,316,751 |