• polarized sunglasses

    From RichD@21:1/5 to All on Wed Mar 30 12:11:33 2022
    How does polarization of light improve a sunglasses
    quality? Or the "sunglass experience", so to speak -

    That is, I presume the usual definition - the lens
    passes light polarized along a single direction.

    --
    Rich

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Phil Hobbs@21:1/5 to RichD on Thu Apr 7 10:18:29 2022
    RichD wrote:
    How does polarization of light improve a sunglasses
    quality? Or the "sunglass experience", so to speak -

    That is, I presume the usual definition - the lens
    passes light polarized along a single direction.

    --
    Rich


    When light reflects obliquely off a dielectric surface, such as water or
    the shiny hood of your car, the reflection is partially polarized,
    usually with the vertical polarization much weaker than horizontal.
    That means that the electric (E) field is vibrating mostly in the
    horizontal direction. (I'm assuming that the surface is horizontal and
    the light is coming from above, which is the usual situation outdoors.)

    So the glints are polarized and the rest of the scene mostly isn't. (*)
    Thus polarizing filters that absorb the horizontal polarization
    selectively reduce the glints. (Doesn't work for reflection from
    metals, of course.)

    The reason is interesting. The electric field of a light ray
    oscillates, but is directed perpendicular to the propagation direction.
    Thus light waves are said to be _transverse_, like the motion of a
    guitar string. (Some other waves, such as compression waves in a
    Slinky, are longitudinal, and others such as sound in air have no
    special direction.)

    At an interface between two non-absorbing dielectrics, the reflected and refracted beams go in different directions, but their fields have to add
    up to the same as the incident wave. (It's slightly more complicated,
    but this is the gist.) The addition is vectorial, so there's a
    difference between horizontal polarization, which stays horizontal, and vertical, which has to change directions on account of the change in propagation direction.

    It turns out that when the reflected and refracted rays are at 90
    degrees to each other, in vertical polarization the reflection goes to
    zero and in horizontal polarization it doesn't. The incidence angle
    where this happens is called "Brewster's angle" after its discoverer.

    For common dielectrics such as water and acrylic paint, Brewster's angle
    is around 55 degrees, but the effect is useful over a reasonably wide range.

    Cheers

    Phil Hobbs

    (*) On a very clear day, the light from the blue sky is also polarized,
    with the maximum amount of polarization visible when you look at 90
    degrees to the sun. The brightness change is easily visible when you
    take off the glasses and rotate them in front of your eye.



    --
    Dr Philip C D Hobbs
    Principal Consultant
    ElectroOptical Innovations LLC / Hobbs ElectroOptics
    Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics
    Briarcliff Manor NY 10510

    http://electrooptical.net
    http://hobbs-eo.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RichD@21:1/5 to Phil Hobbs on Fri Apr 8 14:25:52 2022
    On April 7, Phil Hobbs wrote:
    How does polarization of light improve a sunglasses
    quality? Or the "sunglass experience", so to speak -
    That is, I presume the usual definition - the lens
    passes light polarized along a single direction.

    When light reflects obliquely off a dielectric surface, such as water or
    the shiny hood of your car, the reflection is partially polarized,
    usually with the vertical polarization much weaker than horizontal.
    That means that the electric (E) field is vibrating mostly in the
    horizontal direction. (I'm assuming that the surface is horizontal and
    the light is coming from above, which is the usual situation outdoors.)
    So the glints are polarized and the rest of the scene mostly isn't. (*)
    Thus polarizing filters that absorb the horizontal polarization
    selectively reduce the glints.

    So this type of filter removes the bit we commonly call glare.

    But there's no free lunch. So what's the loss or cost?

    The reason is interesting. The electric field of a light ray
    oscillates, but is directed perpendicular to the propagation direction.
    At an interface between two non-absorbing dielectrics, the reflected and refracted beams go in different directions, but their fields have to add
    up to the same as the incident wave. The addition is vectorial, so
    there's a difference between horizontal polarization, which stays horizontal, and
    vertical, which has to change directions on account of the change in propagation direction.

    It turns out that when the reflected and refracted rays are at 90
    degrees to each other, in vertical polarization the reflection goes to
    zero and in horizontal polarization it doesn't. The incidence angle
    where this happens is called "Brewster's angle" after its discoverer.


    I'm familiar with Brewster angle, but unclear how it affects
    sunglass performance, i.e. the subjective experience.

    --
    Rich

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Phil Hobbs@21:1/5 to RichD on Sat Apr 9 14:01:42 2022
    On 4/8/22 5:25 PM, RichD wrote:
    On April 7, Phil Hobbs wrote:
    How does polarization of light improve a sunglasses
    quality? Or the "sunglass experience", so to speak -
    That is, I presume the usual definition - the lens
    passes light polarized along a single direction.

    When light reflects obliquely off a dielectric surface, such as water or
    the shiny hood of your car, the reflection is partially polarized,
    usually with the vertical polarization much weaker than horizontal.
    That means that the electric (E) field is vibrating mostly in the
    horizontal direction. (I'm assuming that the surface is horizontal and
    the light is coming from above, which is the usual situation outdoors.)
    So the glints are polarized and the rest of the scene mostly isn't. (*)
    Thus polarizing filters that absorb the horizontal polarization
    selectively reduce the glints.

    So this type of filter removes the bit we commonly call glare.

    But there's no free lunch. So what's the loss or cost?

    The reason is interesting. The electric field of a light ray
    oscillates, but is directed perpendicular to the propagation direction.
    At an interface between two non-absorbing dielectrics, the reflected and
    refracted beams go in different directions, but their fields have to add
    up to the same as the incident wave. The addition is vectorial, so
    there's a difference between horizontal polarization, which stays horizontal, and
    vertical, which has to change directions on account of the change in
    propagation direction.

    It turns out that when the reflected and refracted rays are at 90
    degrees to each other, in vertical polarization the reflection goes to
    zero and in horizontal polarization it doesn't. The incidence angle
    where this happens is called "Brewster's angle" after its discoverer.


    I'm familiar with Brewster angle, but unclear how it affects
    sunglass performance, i.e. the subjective experience.

    --
    Rich


    As I said, the glare from dielectric reflections is predominantly horizontally-polarized. Other light from an outdoor scene is nearly all unpolarized, i.e. 50% horizontal and 50% vertical, so by getting rid of
    the horizontally-polarized light you cut down the glare by a lot while attenuating the scene only a little. (Normally you want sunglasses to
    be darker than that anyway.)

    LCD displays may look a bit peculiar, of course.

    Cheers

    Phil Hobbs

    --
    Dr Philip C D Hobbs
    Principal Consultant
    ElectroOptical Innovations LLC / Hobbs ElectroOptics
    Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics
    Briarcliff Manor NY 10510

    http://electrooptical.net
    https://hobbs-eo.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From whit3rd@21:1/5 to RichD on Wed Apr 13 22:57:34 2022
    On Friday, April 8, 2022 at 2:25:53 PM UTC-7, RichD wrote:
    On April 7, Phil Hobbs wrote:
    How does polarization of light improve a sunglasses
    quality?

    I'm familiar with Brewster angle, but unclear how it affects
    sunglass performance, i.e. the subjective experience.

    When light hits paint, part of the light reflects, and part penetrates into the body of the paint and interacts with pigment particles.
    The 'reflects' part is white light, and the interacting light is colored by
    the pigment.

    So, colors of many objects become exceptionally vivid when viewed through
    a polarizing system (depending on the incident light source and aim considerations
    of the polarizing axis). Take a few snapshots with a polarizer, of random items (fabric, paint, glazed
    pottery) that have part-transparent composition. Even oil-finished wood grain just seems to
    pop with the right polarizer setting.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)