[continued from previous message]

to be in accordance with morality and this takes experience and
awareness and more professionalism.


And what is the essence of human smartness ?

This is a good subject of political philosophy..

So we have to be smarter to answer it correctly..

Individual human smartness is composed of genetical
smartness and cultural smartness..

But if you keep talking about individual smartness neglecting
the smartness of a group of humans, this is not correct.

But what is the smartness of a group of humans ?

It is composed of individual smartness , and the smartness
of the interaction of the group of humans, but this is not
a sufficient definition because it must be more understood,
because the smartness of the interaction of a group of people
is also the fact that we have to know that you can fail to solve the
problem because you have not found the right "path" that is more hidden
to smartness that leads to the solution of the problem, and this makes
us understand that the smartest among us can fail at solving a problem
or inventing algorithms if he didn't find the correct path that is more "hidden" to smartness that leads to the solution of the problem , and
this is why we can say that a great number of people that are smart and
less smart can permit us to find the path that is more hidden to
smartness that leads to the solution of the problem, so this makes us understand that the smartness of a "group" of humans is also dependent
on less smart people that can find the right path that is hidden to
smartness that leads to the solution of the problem. This is why our
world needs arabs and needs white europeans and needs asians and needs
south americans etc. to be able to solve problems and to be able to
invent new things.

I have proved that morality is perfection at best.

But this perfection at best must know the following:

What is the essence of a human society ?

We can not call a human society a society if it is not "order" , order
is fondamental to a society, but there is not only order but also the
sens of "sacrifice", and there is hard sacrifice and soft sacrifice,
if we want today to be a "civilization", we have not to generalize
"hard" sacrifice, like being a warrior type of people, like soldiers of
an army, to the general population and tell them to be this hard
sacrifice, because this violence of warriors like the military and the
police has to be kept in control inside the sphere of the military and
the police so that to not cause violence in the rest of the society,
this is the same for the hard sacrifice of other part of the population
like scientists and engineers, because they are doing a "hard" work and
we can call it "hard" sacrifice, so to be able to call a civilization by
the name of a civilization , we have not to generalize this "hard"
sacrifice to the rest of the population and tell all the population to
be hard sacrifice, because it is too much violence, and the rest of the population that is not hard sacrifice has to understand that there is
also what we call "soft" sacrifice that is much less violence such as
being tolerance and being compassion and helping the others without
being a hard sacrifice.

Now i think there is something really important about the essence of
humanity, i think that it is "related" to morality, i said that morality
is perfection at best, and the goal to attain is the goal of life that
is to attain absolute perfection or absolute happiness, so morality that
is perfection at best is pushed towards absolute perfection or absolute happiness, but we have to do more philosophy to understand better the
essence of human evolution, i think that morality of past history has
needed more "diversity" to be able for humans to survive and to be more quality, and diversity has given "immensity" or big "quantity", and you
can notice it inside the evolution of life, that life has needed a
greater number of monkeys and many tests and failures by evolution on
them to evolve towards quality and smartness and so that the monkey
become human and smartness of human. So as you are noticing "diversity"
has given "immensity" or "big" "quantity" and that both diversity and
immensity or big quantity have given quality and smartness(read below
about the essence of smartness to notice it). This is too how "morality"
has evolved, morality has needed diversity and immensity or big quantity
so that to be more perfection, this is why morality too of today is
needing diversity and immensity or big quantity so that to be
perfection, and morality of today knows that perfection of today is also
having the right "imperfections" (that are also diversity) to be
able to be the right perfection(read what i wrote about neo-nazism below
to notice it).

More political philosophy now..

I will speak about an important subject in political philosophy:

As you have noticed beauty and love has been created by wildness of
nature, and after that in the past since perfection was not enough to
ensure a decent morality , that is a decent perfection, humans have
behaved more violently with wars and by practicing slavery etc, so in
that past people were suffering more desorder and violence etc, so i
think we have to be wiser by looking at our actual morality that is
perfection at best,and to be able to judge it more "wisely", so do we
have to be pessimistic of our morality ? i don't think so, because there
is a also a big constrain that morality has to be at least a decent
morality that is a decent perfection to avoid desorder and violence
inside the system, but here comes an important question: How to judge
that it is a decent morality ? here again there is also interpretation
of neo-nazism that is too violent that don't know how to tune
perfection correctly, because neo-nazism is racism and it is extremism
of "perfection" this is why they are discriminating too much, and this
is not perfection at best that is morality, because perfection(and thus morality) is also knowing how to maximize at best success by minimizing
at best failures, here again to be successful at minimizing the failures
you have to "prioritize", this is why neo-nazism must know how
to accept the right "imperfections" to be able to be "correct"
perfection, this is why countries such as Canada and other european
countries are accepting arab immigrants even if some arab immigrants
are less beautiful than white europeans, because beautifulness is
interpreted as being less important than the fact that arab
immigrants are useful for economic growth and for the the social system
etc. and this is morality that prioritize to be able to be successful,
this is why neo-nazism that is too violent towards immigrants is not
correct morality that knows how to manage itself, so i don't
agree with neo-nazism and such idelogies that contain many bugs.


Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)