• How Parents Turn Their Children Into Criminal Psychopaths [The criminal

    From 23x@21:1/5 to All on Mon Feb 26 18:39:07 2018
    How Parents Turn Their Children Into Criminal Psychopaths

    The criminal psychopath is not just born: he is also made.



    ‘Extreme’ styles of parenting are linked to criminal psychopathy in later life, research finds.

    Interviews with criminals have found that many have a history of either total parental neglect or of rigidly controlling, authoritarian parents.

    All criminal psychopaths have a history of grotesque physical and/or psychological abuse during childhood.

    Of course, parents cannot be blamed for everything — after all, some children have awful upbringings and don’t become criminal psychopaths.

    However, explained Dr Aina Gullhaugen, the study’s first author, the pattern cannot be ignored:

    “Without exception, these people have been injured in the company of their caregivers.

    And many of the descriptions made it clear that their later ruthlessness was an attempt to address this damage, but in an inappropriate or bad way.”

    Dr Gullhaugen explained the types of parents criminal psychopaths typically had:



    “If you think of a scale of parental care that goes from nothing, the absence of care, all the way to the totally obsessive parent, most parents are in the ‘middle’.

    The same applies to how we feel about parental control.

    On a scale from ‘not caring’ all the way to ‘totally controlling’, most have parents who end up in the middle.”

    But it is different for psychopaths.

    More than half of the psychopaths I have studied reported that they had been exposed to a parenting style that could be placed on either extreme of these scales.

    Either they lived in a situation where no one cared, where the child is subjected to total control and must be submissive, or the child has been subjected to a neglectful parenting style.”

    Given this, where does the hard, uncaring mask they wear come from?



    Dr Gullhaugen said:

    “It’s hard to say exactly what has created the psychopath’s rock hard mask.

    But as others have said before me: You do not get a personality disorder for your eighteenth birthday present.

    I have seen what children and young people with these kinds of characteristics experience and what it is like for them, through my work in child and adolescent psychiatry.

    Of course, not all reckless behaviour is explained by a bad upbringing, but we do not inherit everything either.

    That is my main point.”

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rev. Enge@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jun 21 14:46:45 2020
    Written by David Juhl
    Alfred Hitchcock Presents premiere episode, “Revenge,” reviewed here
    David Juhl David Juhl
    4 years ago

    Season 1 Episode 1—aired 10/2/55

    “Revenge” ***½

    Teleplay by Francis Cockrell • Story by Samuel Blas
    Directed by Alfred Hitchcock
    Ralph Meeker as Carl Spann
    Vera Miles as Elsa Spann
    Frances Bavier as Mrs. Fergusen
    Ray Montgomery as Man in Grey Suit
    John Gallaudet as Doctor
    Ray Teal as Police Lieutenant
    Norman Wills as Cop
    John Day as Cop
    Lillian O’Malley as Hotel Maid
    Herbert Lyton as Police Lieutenant

    A terrific opening episode to Alfred Hitchcock Presents, directed by the Master of Suspense himself, this story is set in an oceanside trailer park where young married couple Carl and Elsa Span (Ralph Meeker and Vera Miles) have just moved in the hope of
    making a fresh start in the aftermath of Elsa’s apparent nervous breakdown when she was a ballerina.

    Carl’s an engineer and was able to transfer his job. On his first day of work, he makes breakfast and wakes his sleeping wife with a kiss and in the first of several overtly sexual moments for 1955 television, she kisses him back passionately with
    intentions of doing more. He has to cut things off by saying “look, baby, I need to go to work.”

    As they have breakfast, he expresses his concern about leaving her in the trailer alone all day. She gives him what he feels is a naïve, Pollyannaish view of the people around there an about people in general.

    As he begins to drive off to work, he encounters friendly/busybody neighbor Mrs. Fergusen (Frances Bavier, Aunt Bee in the Andy Griffith Show a beginning a few years after this). She offers to look in on Elsa while he’s gone.

    When she does drop by to visit Elsa, we get another sexy scene as Elsa is wearing a man’s shirt (presumably Carl’s), showing a great amount of leg.

    Following her nervous breakdown, her doctor prescribed sea and sun and sea. To that end, Elsa steps out of the trailer and removes the shirt, revealing she is wearing a bathing suit underneath and sits in a low chair to begin to sunbathe. We then get a
    curious point of view shot of Mrs. Fergusen checking out Elsa’s body, lingering on her legs. Her face betrays a mixture of possible desire and concern over Elsa perhaps showing too much skin publicly.

    Carl returns late afternoon with groceries, waves to Mrs. Fergusen. When he opens the trailer door the cake is burning. He finds Elsa in the bedroom, unconscious, holding a carnation blossom in her hand. Then she comes back into semi consciousness saying
    “he killed me” to Carl. “I came in to see the cake, then I turned around and he was standing there. He said he was a salesman, then when he asked me for money I refused him then he grabbed me then I screamed then he choked me, then he killed me. He
    killed me.”

    Later, the police and a doctor arrive on the scene. The doctor says she’s been through a very emotional shock and recommends that Carl remove Elsa from the trailer park, to take her to a hotel. It’s not clear what happened, although sexual assault is
    certainly something that comes to mind.

    The only lead the police have is from one trailer park resident who saw a man come into the park from the beach, six feet tall, grey suit and dark hair.

    Understandably frustrated that the police don’t have enough to go on to pinch the guy, Carl is later smoking at Elsa’s bedside, contemplative. “If I ever find him, I’ll kill him,” he says. Elsa replies “yes.” He asks if she thinks she would
    know the guy if she saw him again, she says “yes, oh yes.” Miles is really good here and in the remainder of the episode– the empty, vacant look in her eyes, the monotone voice, the drooping mouth. Hitchcock clearly was fond of her in this; he
    would cast her the next year co-starring alongside Henry Fonda in The Wrong Man the a few years later as the sister of Janet Leigh’s character in Psycho.

    They decide to drive around before going to the hotel. Here is where Hitchcock’s expertise as a director truly pays dividends and the episode really shifts into overdrive. There is great pacing between close ups, two shots, and travel shots along the
    street. Elsa sees a man from behind in a grey suit walking on the sidewalk and she says “that’s him.” Carl pulls over, grabs a wrench from under the seat he left there for just this eventuality. He follows the man into a hotel, then into an
    elevator and gets off on the same floor. The man goes into his room. Carl walks past him, doubles back to the man’s room, opens the door and goes in.

    In a brilliantly shot single take, we see Carl, filmed from behind, from his back down, enter the man’s room. We see his face as he crosses the room in a mirror’s reflection, then we see his shadow as he violently whacks the unseen man several times
    then backs out, all in one shot. Absolutely great stuff. If you want to see a tremendous example of how to direct such a scene, watch this one.

    Carl walks out of the hotel and gets back in the car. They drive off and Elsa still has a vacant look to her. As they drive through another town, she looks over at some pedestrians and says “there he is, that’s him.” She’s totally out of it. We
    cut to Carl. We begin to hear sirens and his face begins to fall as he realizes that his world is about to come to an end.

    An auspicious series debut, Hitchcock did well to take the directorial reins himself for the first time out. My only quibbles are nagging questions over what exactly did happen, if anything, to Elsa, given her emotionally unstable mindset and whether or
    not suspicion cast upon Mrs. Ferguson was warranted or simply a red herring.

    Advertisements

    Share this:
    Related
    Alfred Hitchcock Presents episode "Premonition" reviewed here
    March 31, 2016
    With 1 comment
    Alfred Hitchcock Presents episode "Don't Come Back Alive" reviewed here
    April 9, 2016
    With 2 comments
    Alfred Hitchcock Presents episode "Triggers in Leash" reviewed here
    April 2, 2016
    Categories: Uncategorized
    Leave a Comment
    Written by David Juhl

    https://davidjuhl.wordpress.com/2016/03/28/alfred-hitchcock-presents-premiere-episode-revenge-reviewed-here/amp/


    On Monday, February 26, 2018 at 8:39:08 PM UTC-6, 23x wrote:
    How Parents Turn Their Children Into Criminal Psychopaths

    The criminal psychopath is not just born: he is also made.



    ‘Extreme’ styles of parenting are linked to criminal psychopathy in later life, research finds.

    Interviews with criminals have found that many have a history of either total parental neglect or of rigidly controlling, authoritarian parents.

    All criminal psychopaths have a history of grotesque physical and/or psychological abuse during childhood.

    Of course, parents cannot be blamed for everything — after all, some children have awful upbringings and don’t become criminal psychopaths.

    However, explained Dr Aina Gullhaugen, the study’s first author, the pattern cannot be ignored:

    “Without exception, these people have been injured in the company of their caregivers.

    And many of the descriptions made it clear that their later ruthlessness was an attempt to address this damage, but in an inappropriate or bad way.”

    Dr Gullhaugen explained the types of parents criminal psychopaths typically had:



    “If you think of a scale of parental care that goes from nothing, the absence of care, all the way to the totally obsessive parent, most parents are in the ‘middle’.

    The same applies to how we feel about parental control.

    On a scale from ‘not caring’ all the way to ‘totally controlling’, most have parents who end up in the middle.”

    But it is different for psychopaths.

    More than half of the psychopaths I have studied reported that they had been exposed to a parenting style that could be placed on either extreme of these scales.

    Either they lived in a situation where no one cared, where the child is subjected to total control and must be submissive, or the child has been subjected to a neglectful parenting style.”

    Given this, where does the hard, uncaring mask they wear come from?



    Dr Gullhaugen said:

    “It’s hard to say exactly what has created the psychopath’s rock hard mask.

    But as others have said before me: You do not get a personality disorder for your eighteenth birthday present.

    I have seen what children and young people with these kinds of characteristics experience and what it is like for them, through my work in child and adolescent psychiatry.

    Of course, not all reckless behaviour is explained by a bad upbringing, but we do not inherit everything either.

    That is my main point.”

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)