• Dr. Larry Clapp

    From petere@bulldoghome.com@21:1/5 to Elton Fan on Sun Feb 21 00:40:46 2016
    On Thursday, July 20, 2006 at 7:57:13 AM UTC+1, Elton Fan wrote:
    Has anyone in this group found any success following the ideas of Dr.
    Larry Clapp?

    http://www.prostate90.com

    Yes I have, I was diagonosed in 2000 & now 15 years later I'm still going. After folllowing Larry Clapp's book "Prostate Health in 90 Days" my PSA which had been going up 1 point a month for 6 months & reached 16, it came down to 9.9 in 3 months. THe
    oncologist just said "that's unusual" when he sa the sudden reversal from rise to fall!
    If that's quackary I'm very grateful for it. So find out the facts before running anything down!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Phillip Helbig (undress to reply@21:1/5 to petere@bulldoghome.com on Sun Feb 21 11:09:08 2016
    In article <9f16f0c3-1ce9-40af-a1c6-55979bfda33c@googlegroups.com>, petere@bulldoghome.com writes:

    On Thursday, July 20, 2006 at 7:57:13 AM UTC+1, Elton Fan wrote:
    Has anyone in this group found any success following the ideas of Dr.
    Larry Clapp?

    http://www.prostate90.com

    Yes I have, I was diagonosed in 2000 & now 15 years later I'm still going. After folllowing Larry Clapp's book "Prostate Health in 90 Days" my PSA
    which had been going up 1 point a month for 6 months & reached 16, it came down to 9.9 in 3 months. THe oncologist just said "that's unusual" when he saw the sudden reversal from rise to fall!
    If that's quackary I'm very grateful for it. So find out the facts before running anything down!

    http://www.prostate90.com advertizes penis-enlargement pills. Which, if
    any, of the following is true:

    o They have the side effect of reducing PSA.

    o The URL formerly pointed to a website about reducing PSA.

    o The post quoted above is spam.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From jmscrosby04@gmail.com@21:1/5 to George Conklin on Thu Mar 12 13:15:38 2020
    On Thursday, July 20, 2006 at 4:41:04 PM UTC-7, George Conklin wrote:
    "Steve Jordan" <mycroftscj1@cox.net> wrote in message news:zqUvg.38809$AB3.22083@fed1read02...
    On July 21, George Conklin, after quoting Ed Friedman's post, wrote:
    What I find interesting about your post is that you find it impossible
    to
    test his theory, no matter what. The only real tes would mean time of survival following a standardized diagnosis, which is just what the
    whole
    oncology field is lacking---and I'm afraid it is on purpose.

    What I find interesting about George's message is that he evidently has
    no idea at all of the nature of this Clapp fellow's business and background.

    I have not studied it in depth, having little time for foolishness, but
    I have learned this much in about ten minutes:

    1. Clapp promotes medical nostrums. He is not a medical doctor. He is a lawyer (kyrie eleison!). He holds a PhD, for whatever it's worth, from
    an outfit called Galien University Tutorial College (mail-order degrees, anyone?). It was formerly known as Galien College of Natural Healing. It was based upon his "years of research" into what he's selling.

    I'll bet that I can buy a PhD just as good as his within 24 hours -- if someone else would pay the fee. George?

    2. He is covered on the Quackwatch website: http://www.quackwatch.org/00AboutQuackwatch/altseek.html
    or
    http://tinyurl.com/t15m

    3. It does not appear that Clapp offers much of anything that other
    medical scammers don't.
    Mostly eye of newt and toe of frog, I think.

    Since George claims to believe that there is a purposeful lack of standardized diagnoses (whose purpose, why, what diagnoses?), if I interpret his turgid language correctly, perhaps he will undertake to correct this omission. Standing by.....

    Regards,

    Steve J

    "Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe."
    -- Albert Einstein

    Ok, so he is a quack. But that is not what I was addressing. Even
    so-called 'certified' procedures remain poorly evaluated. The money is in the treatment, NOT the result.

    and now you have hit the heart of problem with medicine in America, one word, money, my quack doctor a Urologist out of the medical school, Univ of Chicago, the only thing this quacke wants to do with me is get me in the OR and cut my prostate out, he
    wanted to do a biopsy, I told no and had an MRI, results, no signs of cancer, if this clown takes me into the OR that's a $20,000.00 day for him

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)