BX_PROTOCOL___ARCHIVE_THREAD_8772
http://bx-energy-catalyst.com/8778.htm
[*quote*]
--------------------------------------------------------
TG-1 * Transgallaxys Forum 1
April 13, 2016, 08:40:13 AM
Welcome, Guest
TG-1 * Transgallaxys Forum 1 >
Die Drahtzieher / Hintergruende und Methoden >
The Dewayne Lee Smith files, BX Protocol, Delta Institute, Utah > BX_PROTOCOL___ARCHIVE_THREAD_8772
Pages: [1]
Print
Author
Topic: BX_PROTOCOL___ARCHIVE_THREAD_8772 (Read 355 times)
FRAUENPOWER
Jr. Member
Posts: 134
BX_PROTOCOL___ARCHIVE_THREAD_8772
« on: January 27, 2016, 02:47:07 AM »
This is the header, prepared for the incoming fraudulent attacks by
Dewayne Lee Smith and his accomplices.
The following spam by "Douglas Hillford" is archived into this thread.
Net parameters:
Code: [Select]
Username: DouglasHillford
Email:
douglashillford@gmail.com
Date Registered: January 26, 2016, 05:16:29 PM
IP: 81.62.80.213
Hostname: 213.80.62.81.dynamic.wline.res.cust.swisscom.ch
Last Active: January 28, 2016, 07:35:43 PM
« Last Edit: February 02, 2016, 03:18:18 PM by FRAUENPOWER »
Logged
FRAUENPOWER!
http://www.femen.org
DouglasHillford
Newbie
Posts: 1
Re: Delta Institute @BX_Protocol is a vicious fraud
« Reply #1 on: January 28, 2016, 04:59:51 PM »
A coworker recently introduced me to the BX Protocol. I had never heard
of the Delta Institute or the BX Protocol so I felt it was important to
do thorough research. After all, I am a recent graduate who just
completed a four year degree program. Critical thinking has become a
large part of who I am. While I always appreciate information that is
provided to me, I like to draw my own conclusions based on my
independent research. I do not make any decision lightly. I am an
over-thinker. I look at every possible angle before coming to a
conclusion. I often describe myself as an optimistic skeptic. I always
seek to find the good, but I remain skeptical until I have enough
information to form an educated opinion.
My coworker, knowing my skepticism, encouraged me to conduct my own
research so I could draw my own conclusion. My first stop was the
company website. I started by clicking on every tab and reviewing every
link, video, and document. I took notes on anything I questioned so I
could conduct my own independent research using scholarly sources. I
evaluated their marketing and testimonials. I conducted web searches to
see what others were saying. At the end of my research, I concluded that
while I didn’t fully understand how the BX Protocol worked, why it works scientifically makes sense to me. Results from their independent
research are presented on their website and I was able to find sources
that helped me make sense of why they conducted the study the way they
did. The fact that there are no peer-reviewed articles mattered very
little to me. I could scientifically validate why they conducted the
research.
One thing that stood out to me is the fact that there seems to be some
obvious attacks against the creators of the BX Protocol. Naturally, my curiosity was peaked. I always assume the person or group making the
attacks must honestly believe they are protecting consumers. After all,
they must emphatically believe the company is doing harm if they are
going through so much trouble to discredit the company. I began
researching every claim made to see if there was any validity. What I
found was disturbing and did nothing but show me that these attacks are
not being carried out to protect the interests of consumers. I don’t
often refer to others’ viewpoints as propaganda. It is not a term I just
throw around. However, in this case, my research showed me that the
information being spread meets the very definition of propaganda. It is
being used to mislead those who are interested in the BX Protocol and
doing them a great disservice.
The way I see it, there have been some valid questions asked by various
sources regarding the science behind the protocol, how the program
works, who runs the program, what their credentials are, if the program
is a scam, and various other rational questions. The Delta Institute
always provides a professional answer and often explains how to find
additional information. When personal attacks against employees have
been made (like accusations that they are criminals) they provided a
formal response. They did not hide anything and explained the true
nature of the situation. This spoke volumes to me. Any time someone
resorts to attacks of this nature, especially when they are spreading
false allegations, they discredit themselves to me. I found it
despicable that a claim was made that an individual died because they
chose the protocol over chemotherapy when the page they cited provided
evidence that the person did choose chemotherapy. My impression is that
this is a blatant attempt to discredit the organization by spreading
deceitful information.
I could go on and on about the claims being made and how I found them to
be untrue. Rather than do that, I encourage those who are skeptical to
conduct their own research and draw their own conclusion. Use credible
sources and do not rely on Wikipedia pages. Wikipedia’s own disclaimer
mentions that information on Wikipedia is contributed by anyone who
wants to post material and that the expertise of the poster is not taken
into consideration. When using Wikipedia as a source, you may be reading information that is outdated, posted by someone who isn’t an expert in
the field, or someone who simply wants to provide misinformation.
Logged
FRAUENPOWER
Jr. Member
Posts: 134
Re: BX_PROTOCOL___ARCHIVE_THREAD_8772
« Reply #2 on: February 02, 2016, 03:29:19 PM »
The following web-page is frozen and archived as
http://archive.is/NI8Hr
The same text that a "Douglas Hillford" posted in the thread 8772 of the
TG-1 was on the very same day posted in the blog of the criminal Dewayne
Lee Smith, but with the name "M.B." for the author.
If the "Delta Institute has nothing to hide", why then does Dewayne Lee
Smith use two different names?
So we have one more piece of proof by Smith himself that he is a fraud.
http://www.bxprotocol.com/blog.php?id=60
[*quote*]
Why Delta Institute has nothing to hide
Jan 28, 2016, by M. B.
A coworker recently introduced me to the BX Protocol. I had never heard
of the Delta Institute or the BX Protocol so I felt it was important to
do thorough research. After all, I am a recent graduate who just
completed a four year degree program. Critical thinking has become a
large part of who I am. While I always appreciate information that is
provided to me, I like to draw my own conclusions based on my
independent research. I do not make any decision lightly. I am an
over-thinker. I look at every possible angle before coming to a
conclusion. I often describe myself as an optimistic skeptic. I always
seek to find the good, but I remain skeptical until I have enough
information to form an educated opinion.
My coworker, knowing my skepticism, encouraged me to conduct my own
research so I could draw my own conclusion. My first stop was the
company website. I started by clicking on every tab and reviewing every
link, video, and document. I took notes on anything I questioned so I
could conduct my own independent research using scholarly sources. I
evaluated their marketing and testimonials. I conducted web searches to
see what others were saying. At the end of my research, I concluded that
while I didn’t fully understand how the BX Protocol worked, why it works scientifically makes sense to me. Results from their independent
research are presented on their website and I was able to find sources
that helped me make sense of why they conducted the study the way they
did. The fact that there are no peer-reviewed articles mattered very
little to me. I could scientifically validate why they conducted the
research.
One thing that stood out to me is the fact that there seems to be some
obvious attacks against the creators of the BX Protocol. Naturally, my curiosity was peaked. I always assume the person or group making the
attacks must honestly believe they are protecting consumers. After all,
they must emphatically believe the company is doing harm if they are
going through so much trouble to discredit the company. I began
researching every claim made to see if there was any validity. What I
found was disturbing and did nothing but show me that these attacks are
not being carried out to protect the interests of consumers. I don’t
often refer to others’ viewpoints as propaganda. It is not a term I just
throw around. However, in this case, my research showed me that the
information being spread meets the very definition of propaganda. It is
being used to mislead those who are interested in the BX Protocol and
doing them a great disservice.
The way I see it, there have been some valid questions asked by various
sources regarding the science behind the protocol, how the program
works, who runs the program, what their credentials are, if the program
is a scam, and various other rational questions. The Delta Institute
always provides a professional answer and often explains how to find
additional information. When personal attacks against employees have
been made (like accusations that they are criminals) they provided a
formal response. They did not hide anything and explained the true
nature of the situation. This spoke volumes to me. Any time someone
resorts to attacks of this nature, especially when they are spreading
false allegations, they discredit themselves to me. I found it
despicable that a claim was made that an individual died because they
chose the protocol over chemotherapy when the page they cited provided
evidence that the person did choose chemotherapy. My impression is that
this is a blatant attempt to discredit the organization by spreading
deceitful information.
I could go on and on about the claims being made and how I found them to
be untrue. Rather than do that, I encourage those who are skeptical to
conduct their own research and draw their own conclusion. Use credible
sources and do not rely on Wikipedia pages. Wikipedia’s own disclaimer
mentions that information on Wikipedia is contributed by anyone who
wants to post material and that the expertise of the poster is not taken
into consideration. When using Wikipedia as a source, you may be reading information that is outdated, posted by someone who isn’t an expert in
the field, or someone who simply wants to provide misinformation.
M. B., Guest Blogger
26 Likes
Privacy Policy | Contact Us | Disclaimer
© 2016 Delta Institute International. All rights reserved - Domestic &
Foreign.
Powered by Delta Institute VESp™ a Virtual Enterprise Software
processor.
[*/quote*]
Thanks for your fingerprints.
Logged
FRAUENPOWER!
http://www.femen.org
Print
Pages: [1]
TG-1 * Transgallaxys Forum 1 >
Die Drahtzieher / Hintergruende und Methoden >
The Dewayne Lee Smith files, BX Protocol, Delta Institute, Utah > BX_PROTOCOL___ARCHIVE_THREAD_8772 --------------------------------------------------------
[*/quote*]
--
Homöopathie ist nichts als Hütchenspielerbetrug und organisierte Kriminalität
http://ariplex.com/folia/archives/565.htm http://ariplex.com/folia/archives/570.htm
http://ariplex.com/folia/archives/585.htm http://ariplex.com/folia/archives/643.htm
http://ariplex.com/folia/archives/647.htm
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)