https://reason.com/2023/03/20/britains-lockdown-files-reveal-the-sordid-thinking-behind-pandemic-policy/
Eye-opening insights into the messy motivations behind restrictive
COVID-19 responses.
On Mon, 20 Mar 2023 04:47:05 -0700, NOT Michael Ejercito <MEjercit@HotMail.com> wrote:
https://reason.com/2023/03/20/britains-lockdown-files-reveal-the-sordid-thinking-behind-pandemic-policy/
Eye-opening insights into the messy motivations behind restrictive
COVID-19 responses.
How can this have ANY possible relevance to an illegal Flip infesting
Long Beach, gook?
REAL NEMO wrote:
On Mon, 20 Mar 2023 04:47:05 -0700, NOT Michael EjercitoInstead of addressing the merits of the article, you call me a gook.
<MEjercit@HotMail.com> wrote:
https://reason.com/2023/03/20/britains-lockdown-files-reveal-the-sordid-thinking-behind-pandemic-policy/
Eye-opening insights into the messy motivations behind restrictive
COVID-19 responses.
How can this have ANY possible relevance to an illegal Flip infesting
Long Beach, gook?
Mangina, this is immoral.
You are a Nazi.
As a Nazi, you are, above all else
https://reason.com/2023/03/20/britains-lockdown-files-reveal-the-sordid-thinking-behind-pandemic-policy/
Eye-opening insights into the messy motivations behind restrictive
COVID-19 responses.
J.D. TUCCILLE | 3.20.2023 7:00 AM
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on RedditShare by emailPrint
friendly versionCopy page URL
A sign at the entrance to the British Museum in London announces that it
is temporarily closed due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
(VVShots | Dreamstime.com)
When cornered, some politicians grudgingly admit COVID-19 restrictions
went too far and made little sense. But that still leaves us wondering
as to their thinking when they locked playgrounds, mandated masks,
restricted travel, shuttered businesses, closed schools, confined people
to their homes, sent cops after paddle-boarders floating on the lonely
sea, ignored their own rules, and otherwise inflicted harms worse than a >virus could ever manage. Now an important disclosure of communications
among British officials reveals just how government officials' minds
work when exercising extraordinary power. It's not a pretty sight.
Belated Regrets
"We had to make some decisions, that in retrospect, don't make a lot of >sense," Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer recently conceded with regard
to lockdown orders issued after COVID-19 appeared. "Some of those
policies, I look back and think: that was maybe a little more than we
needed to do."
Those policies arbitrarily parsed between "essential" and "nonessential" >businesses for the imposition of draconian rules, even banning the sale
of gardening supplies to people stranded at home. They were notoriously >ill-considered and intrusive, making an admission of error necessary, if >consequence-free. It was also belated, since the state Supreme Court
ruled Whitmer's use of emergency powers unconstitutional in 2020, and >lawmakers repealed them in 2021 in response to a citizen initiative.
But, if they're sorry-ish now, what in the hell were Whitmer and her ilk >thinking when they cooked up restrictive policies? For a peek behind the
dank and musty curtain we turn to Britain, where The Telegraph this
month published The Lockdown Files drawn from 100,000 messages exchanged >among government officials. They reveal powerful people warned that >restrictive policies would cause more harm than the disease, decisions
made for public relations reasons, media enlisted to suppress dissent,
and officials gloating over inconveniences to the public.
The Rattler is a weekly newsletter from J.D. Tuccille. If you care about >government overreach and tangible threats to everyday liberty, this is
for you.
Email Address
Submit
A Peek Behind the Scenes
"WhatsApp conversations contained in The Telegraph's Lockdown Files show
that those running the country privately acknowledged the 'terrible'
price of lockdowns and twice reimposed the national shutdowns, even as
they discussed the damage they were causing to physical and mental
health, children's prospects and mental health," the newspaper's team
noted. Among the consequences of which they were directly warned were >interrupted medical treatments and ill effects on children.
"A civil servant [in then-Health Secretary Matt] Hancock's private
office sent him a WhatsApp message alerting him to a child respiratory
virus that was expected to surge in the summer months as a result of the >virus being suppressed during lockdownknown in Whitehall as an NPI, or >non-pharmaceutical intervention," The Telegraph reports. In fact, cases
of the virus, RSV, subsequently soared in 2021 among children shielded
from the bug by social distancing orders, trading one infection for another.
In addition, officials were "worried about the Government being sued by
the families of those who had died because of the backlog on cancer care
and elective treatments."
When the British public became resistant to damaging restrictions on >business, gatherings, and movement, Hancock openly embraced plans to
"deploy" news of COVID-19 variants to "frighten the pants off everyone"
to encourage compliance with lockdown rules. The idea was sufficiently
well accepted that officials referred to their efforts as "Project Fear."
Fomenting panic was in keeping with the seat-of-the-pants
decision-making driving much pandemic policy. Then-Prime Minister Boris >Johnson boasted of making decisions based on "science," but was more
driven by pollingand sometimes by what he himself feared was bad data
that overstated risks.
Johnson "appeared to express a desire to lift the country out of
lockdown earlier than planned, but said his media advisers Lee Cain
and James Slack warned him that such a move was 'too far ahead of
public opinion'," reports The Telegraph. "When Mr Johnson broached the >subject of opening schools before the summer, his health secretary
argued against doing so, saying that 'everyone's accepted there won't be
more on schools until September'."
"The exchanges call into question the prime minister's insistence that >lockdown decisions were made on the basis of the best scientific
evidence," adds The Telegraph. "They also raise the prospect that
Britain spent many weeks living under restrictions that could have been >avoided."
What's the English Word for Schadenfreude?
And at least a few officials gained pleasure from the pain they imposed
on others, openly applauding harsh enforcement of rules that were open
to interpretation.
"Simon Case, the Cabinet Secretary, said it was 'hilarious' that 149
people had been told to stay in government-approved hotels on their
return from Red List countries in 2021," the newspaper summarized. "He
also joked about passengers being 'locked up' in 'shoe box' rooms. Those
on the receiving end of the quarantine policy at the time said it was
like being 'in Guantanamo Bay'."
For his part, Hancock "was an advocate of using the police to crack down
on anyone deemed to have broken quarantine or lockdown rules, even
though the regulations were often open to interpretation. He expressed >satisfaction when the 'plod' were given their 'marching orders'."
No Dissent Allowed
It wouldn't be 2023 if we didn't talk about policymakers compiling
enemies lists of lockdown opponents and "threatening to withdraw funding
for projects" in the districts of dissident legislators. Or of the
media's role in promoting establishment talking points and suppressing >dissent.
"What was most alarming was the alacrity with which the broadcast news
media fell into line with boundless enthusiasm as they were given a
key role in the day to day dissemination of government authority,"
observed The Telegraph's Janet Daly. "As the medium through which the >official information was conveyed with, as we now know, often
misleading modelling projections and outdated death figures they went
from being public service news media to what the BBC notably has always >insisted it is not: state broadcasters. From disinterested journalism to >Pravda in a single bound."
That should sound familiar to Americans who have had a similarly
revelatory peek through the Twitter Files and similar leaks into
government efforts to suppress inconvenient (to the powerful)
viewpoints. We've also seen politicians demonize critical journalists
such as Matt Taibbi and Michael Shellenberger.
The correspondence in the "Lockdown Files" was leaked to The Telegraph
by journalist Isabel Oakeshott, who was collaborating with Matt Hancock
on his memoir and was disturbed by what she saw.
"We were all let down by the response to the pandemic and repeated >unnecessary lockdowns," she commented earlier this month. "Children, in >particular, paid a terrible price. Anyone who questioned an approach we
now know was fatally flawed was utterly vilified; including highly
respected and eminent public health experts, doctors and scientists."
We may never know exactly what members of America's own
pandemic-exploiting political class were thinking when they turned the
screws on people's liberties. But thanks to the Lockdown Files, we can
make a good guess.
On Mon, 20 Mar 2023 04:47:05 -0700, Michael Ejercito
<MEjercit@HotMail.com> wrote:
https://reason.com/2023/03/20/britains-lockdown-files-reveal-the-sordid-thinking-behind-pandemic-policy/
Eye-opening insights into the messy motivations behind restrictive
COVID-19 responses.
J.D. TUCCILLE | 3.20.2023 7:00 AM
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on RedditShare by emailPrint
friendly versionCopy page URL
A sign at the entrance to the British Museum in London announces that it
is temporarily closed due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
(VVShots | Dreamstime.com)
When cornered, some politicians grudgingly admit COVID-19 restrictions
went too far and made little sense. But that still leaves us wondering
as to their thinking when they locked playgrounds, mandated masks,
restricted travel, shuttered businesses, closed schools, confined people
to their homes, sent cops after paddle-boarders floating on the lonely
sea, ignored their own rules, and otherwise inflicted harms worse than a
virus could ever manage. Now an important disclosure of communications
among British officials reveals just how government officials' minds
work when exercising extraordinary power. It's not a pretty sight.
Belated Regrets
"We had to make some decisions, that in retrospect, don't make a lot of
sense," Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer recently conceded with regard
to lockdown orders issued after COVID-19 appeared. "Some of those
policies, I look back and think: that was maybe a little more than we
needed to do."
Those policies arbitrarily parsed between "essential" and "nonessential"
businesses for the imposition of draconian rules, even banning the sale
of gardening supplies to people stranded at home. They were notoriously
ill-considered and intrusive, making an admission of error necessary, if
consequence-free. It was also belated, since the state Supreme Court
ruled Whitmer's use of emergency powers unconstitutional in 2020, and
lawmakers repealed them in 2021 in response to a citizen initiative.
But, if they're sorry-ish now, what in the hell were Whitmer and her ilk
thinking when they cooked up restrictive policies? For a peek behind the
dank and musty curtain we turn to Britain, where The Telegraph this
month published The Lockdown Files drawn from 100,000 messages exchanged
among government officials. They reveal powerful people warned that
restrictive policies would cause more harm than the disease, decisions
made for public relations reasons, media enlisted to suppress dissent,
and officials gloating over inconveniences to the public.
The Rattler is a weekly newsletter from J.D. Tuccille. If you care about
government overreach and tangible threats to everyday liberty, this is
for you.
Email Address
Submit
A Peek Behind the Scenes
"WhatsApp conversations contained in The Telegraph's Lockdown Files show
that those running the country privately acknowledged the 'terrible'
price of lockdowns and twice reimposed the national shutdowns, even as
they discussed the damage they were causing to physical and mental
health, children's prospects and mental health," the newspaper's team
noted. Among the consequences of which they were directly warned were
interrupted medical treatments and ill effects on children.
"A civil servant [in then-Health Secretary Matt] Hancock's private
office sent him a WhatsApp message alerting him to a child respiratory
virus that was expected to surge in the summer months as a result of the
virus being suppressed during lockdown—known in Whitehall as an NPI, or
non-pharmaceutical intervention," The Telegraph reports. In fact, cases
of the virus, RSV, subsequently soared in 2021 among children shielded >>from the bug by social distancing orders, trading one infection for another. >>
In addition, officials were "worried about the Government being sued by
the families of those who had died because of the backlog on cancer care
and elective treatments."
When the British public became resistant to damaging restrictions on
business, gatherings, and movement, Hancock openly embraced plans to
"deploy" news of COVID-19 variants to "frighten the pants off everyone"
to encourage compliance with lockdown rules. The idea was sufficiently
well accepted that officials referred to their efforts as "Project Fear."
Fomenting panic was in keeping with the seat-of-the-pants
decision-making driving much pandemic policy. Then-Prime Minister Boris
Johnson boasted of making decisions based on "science," but was more
driven by polling—and sometimes by what he himself feared was bad data
that overstated risks.
Johnson "appeared to express a desire to lift the country out of
lockdown earlier than planned, but said his media advisers – Lee Cain
and James Slack – warned him that such a move was 'too far ahead of
public opinion'," reports The Telegraph. "When Mr Johnson broached the
subject of opening schools before the summer, his health secretary
argued against doing so, saying that 'everyone's accepted there won't be
more on schools until September'."
"The exchanges call into question the prime minister's insistence that
lockdown decisions were made on the basis of the best scientific
evidence," adds The Telegraph. "They also raise the prospect that
Britain spent many weeks living under restrictions that could have been
avoided."
What's the English Word for Schadenfreude?
And at least a few officials gained pleasure from the pain they imposed
on others, openly applauding harsh enforcement of rules that were open
to interpretation.
"Simon Case, the Cabinet Secretary, said it was 'hilarious' that 149
people had been told to stay in government-approved hotels on their
return from Red List countries in 2021," the newspaper summarized. "He
also joked about passengers being 'locked up' in 'shoe box' rooms. Those
on the receiving end of the quarantine policy at the time said it was
like being 'in Guantanamo Bay'."
For his part, Hancock "was an advocate of using the police to crack down
on anyone deemed to have broken quarantine or lockdown rules, even
though the regulations were often open to interpretation. He expressed
satisfaction when the 'plod' were given their 'marching orders'."
No Dissent Allowed
It wouldn't be 2023 if we didn't talk about policymakers compiling
enemies lists of lockdown opponents and "threatening to withdraw funding
for projects" in the districts of dissident legislators. Or of the
media's role in promoting establishment talking points and suppressing
dissent.
"What was most alarming was the alacrity with which the broadcast news
media fell into line – with boundless enthusiasm – as they were given a >> key role in the day to day dissemination of government authority,"
observed The Telegraph's Janet Daly. "As the medium through which the
official information was conveyed – with, as we now know, often
misleading modelling projections and outdated death figures – they went >>from being public service news media to what the BBC notably has always
insisted it is not: state broadcasters. From disinterested journalism to
Pravda in a single bound."
That should sound familiar to Americans who have had a similarly
revelatory peek through the Twitter Files and similar leaks into
government efforts to suppress inconvenient (to the powerful)
viewpoints. We've also seen politicians demonize critical journalists
such as Matt Taibbi and Michael Shellenberger.
The correspondence in the "Lockdown Files" was leaked to The Telegraph
by journalist Isabel Oakeshott, who was collaborating with Matt Hancock
on his memoir and was disturbed by what she saw.
"We were all let down by the response to the pandemic and repeated
unnecessary lockdowns," she commented earlier this month. "Children, in
particular, paid a terrible price. Anyone who questioned an approach we
now know was fatally flawed was utterly vilified; including highly
respected and eminent public health experts, doctors and scientists."
We may never know exactly what members of America's own
pandemic-exploiting political class were thinking when they turned the
screws on people's liberties. But thanks to the Lockdown Files, we can
make a good guess.
In the interim, the only *perfect* (Matt 5:47-8) way to eradicate the COVID-19 virus, thereby saving lives, in the UK & elsewhere is by
rapidly ( http://bit.ly/RapidTestCOVID-19 ) finding out at any given
moment, including even while on-line, who among us are unwittingly
contagious (i.e pre-symptomatic or asymptomatic) in order to http://WDJW.great-site.net/ConvinceItForward (John 15:12) for them to
call their doctor and self-quarantine per their doctor in hopes of
stopping this pandemic. Thus, we're hoping for the best while
preparing for the worse-case scenario of the Alpha lineage mutations
and others like the Omicron, Gamma, Beta, Epsilon, Iota, Lambda, Mu &
Delta lineage mutations combining via slip-RNA-replication to form
hybrids like http://tinyurl.com/Deltamicron that may render current
COVID vaccines/monoclonals/medicines/pills no longer effective.
Indeed, I am wonderfully hungry ( http://tinyurl.com/RapidOmicronTest
) and hope you, Michael, also have a healthy appetite too.
So how are you ?
On Mon, 20 Mar 2023 06:12:08 -0700, NOT Michael Ejercito <MEjercit@HotMail.com> wrote:Nithing, it is immoral for you to call anyone a gook.
REAL NEMO wrote:
On Mon, 20 Mar 2023 04:47:05 -0700, NOT Michael EjercitoInstead of addressing the merits of the article, you call me a gook.
<MEjercit@HotMail.com> wrote:
https://reason.com/2023/03/20/britains-lockdown-files-reveal-the-sordid-thinking-behind-pandemic-policy/
Eye-opening insights into the messy motivations behind restrictive
COVID-19 responses.
How can this have ANY possible relevance to an illegal Flip infesting
Long Beach, gook?
Instead of addressing the relevance of the article to a gook like you,
you bitch about being called a gook.
Mangina, this is immoral.
Gook, your denying being a gook is what's immoral.
You are a Nazi.
As a Nazi, you are, above all else
Yup.
Indeed.
Right on, all counts.
I sure, am.
No doubt, about it.
You got, THAT right!
YOU, on the other hand, are WAAAAAAAAAAY below all else!
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Michael Ejercito wrote:
https://reason.com/2023/03/20/britains-lockdown-files-reveal-the-sordid-thinking-behind-pandemic-policy/
Eye-opening insights into the messy motivations behind restrictive
COVID-19 responses.
J.D. TUCCILLE | 3.20.2023 7:00 AM
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on RedditShare by emailPrint
friendly versionCopy page URL
A sign at the entrance to the British Museum in London announces that it >>> is temporarily closed due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
(VVShots | Dreamstime.com)
When cornered, some politicians grudgingly admit COVID-19 restrictions
went too far and made little sense. But that still leaves us wondering
as to their thinking when they locked playgrounds, mandated masks,
restricted travel, shuttered businesses, closed schools, confined people >>> to their homes, sent cops after paddle-boarders floating on the lonely
sea, ignored their own rules, and otherwise inflicted harms worse than a >>> virus could ever manage. Now an important disclosure of communications
among British officials reveals just how government officials' minds
work when exercising extraordinary power. It's not a pretty sight.
Belated Regrets
"We had to make some decisions, that in retrospect, don't make a lot of
sense," Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer recently conceded with regard >>> to lockdown orders issued after COVID-19 appeared. "Some of those
policies, I look back and think: that was maybe a little more than we
needed to do."
Those policies arbitrarily parsed between "essential" and "nonessential" >>> businesses for the imposition of draconian rules, even banning the sale
of gardening supplies to people stranded at home. They were notoriously
ill-considered and intrusive, making an admission of error necessary, if >>> consequence-free. It was also belated, since the state Supreme Court
ruled Whitmer's use of emergency powers unconstitutional in 2020, and
lawmakers repealed them in 2021 in response to a citizen initiative.
But, if they're sorry-ish now, what in the hell were Whitmer and her ilk >>> thinking when they cooked up restrictive policies? For a peek behind the >>> dank and musty curtain we turn to Britain, where The Telegraph this
month published The Lockdown Files drawn from 100,000 messages exchanged >>> among government officials. They reveal powerful people warned that
restrictive policies would cause more harm than the disease, decisions
made for public relations reasons, media enlisted to suppress dissent,
and officials gloating over inconveniences to the public.
The Rattler is a weekly newsletter from J.D. Tuccille. If you care about >>> government overreach and tangible threats to everyday liberty, this is
for you.
Email Address
Submit
A Peek Behind the Scenes
"WhatsApp conversations contained in The Telegraph's Lockdown Files show >>> that those running the country privately acknowledged the 'terrible'
price of lockdowns and twice reimposed the national shutdowns, even as
they discussed the damage they were causing to physical and mental
health, children's prospects and mental health," the newspaper's team
noted. Among the consequences of which they were directly warned were
interrupted medical treatments and ill effects on children.
"A civil servant [in then-Health Secretary Matt] Hancock's private
office sent him a WhatsApp message alerting him to a child respiratory
virus that was expected to surge in the summer months as a result of the >>> virus being suppressed during lockdownknown in Whitehall as an NPI, or
non-pharmaceutical intervention," The Telegraph reports. In fact, cases
of the virus, RSV, subsequently soared in 2021 among children shielded >>>from the bug by social distancing orders, trading one infection for another. >>>
In addition, officials were "worried about the Government being sued by
the families of those who had died because of the backlog on cancer care >>> and elective treatments."
When the British public became resistant to damaging restrictions on
business, gatherings, and movement, Hancock openly embraced plans to
"deploy" news of COVID-19 variants to "frighten the pants off everyone"
to encourage compliance with lockdown rules. The idea was sufficiently
well accepted that officials referred to their efforts as "Project Fear." >>>
Fomenting panic was in keeping with the seat-of-the-pants
decision-making driving much pandemic policy. Then-Prime Minister Boris
Johnson boasted of making decisions based on "science," but was more
driven by pollingand sometimes by what he himself feared was bad data
that overstated risks.
Johnson "appeared to express a desire to lift the country out of
lockdown earlier than planned, but said his media advisers Lee Cain
and James Slack warned him that such a move was 'too far ahead of
public opinion'," reports The Telegraph. "When Mr Johnson broached the
subject of opening schools before the summer, his health secretary
argued against doing so, saying that 'everyone's accepted there won't be >>> more on schools until September'."
"The exchanges call into question the prime minister's insistence that
lockdown decisions were made on the basis of the best scientific
evidence," adds The Telegraph. "They also raise the prospect that
Britain spent many weeks living under restrictions that could have been
avoided."
What's the English Word for Schadenfreude?
And at least a few officials gained pleasure from the pain they imposed
on others, openly applauding harsh enforcement of rules that were open
to interpretation.
"Simon Case, the Cabinet Secretary, said it was 'hilarious' that 149
people had been told to stay in government-approved hotels on their
return from Red List countries in 2021," the newspaper summarized. "He
also joked about passengers being 'locked up' in 'shoe box' rooms. Those >>> on the receiving end of the quarantine policy at the time said it was
like being 'in Guantanamo Bay'."
For his part, Hancock "was an advocate of using the police to crack down >>> on anyone deemed to have broken quarantine or lockdown rules, even
though the regulations were often open to interpretation. He expressed
satisfaction when the 'plod' were given their 'marching orders'."
No Dissent Allowed
It wouldn't be 2023 if we didn't talk about policymakers compiling
enemies lists of lockdown opponents and "threatening to withdraw funding >>> for projects" in the districts of dissident legislators. Or of the
media's role in promoting establishment talking points and suppressing
dissent.
"What was most alarming was the alacrity with which the broadcast news
media fell into line with boundless enthusiasm as they were given a
key role in the day to day dissemination of government authority,"
observed The Telegraph's Janet Daly. "As the medium through which the
official information was conveyed with, as we now know, often
misleading modelling projections and outdated death figures they went >>>from being public service news media to what the BBC notably has always
insisted it is not: state broadcasters. From disinterested journalism to >>> Pravda in a single bound."
That should sound familiar to Americans who have had a similarly
revelatory peek through the Twitter Files and similar leaks into
government efforts to suppress inconvenient (to the powerful)
viewpoints. We've also seen politicians demonize critical journalists
such as Matt Taibbi and Michael Shellenberger.
The correspondence in the "Lockdown Files" was leaked to The Telegraph
by journalist Isabel Oakeshott, who was collaborating with Matt Hancock
on his memoir and was disturbed by what she saw.
"We were all let down by the response to the pandemic and repeated
unnecessary lockdowns," she commented earlier this month. "Children, in
particular, paid a terrible price. Anyone who questioned an approach we
now know was fatally flawed was utterly vilified; including highly
respected and eminent public health experts, doctors and scientists."
We may never know exactly what members of America's own
pandemic-exploiting political class were thinking when they turned the
screws on people's liberties. But thanks to the Lockdown Files, we can
make a good guess.
In the interim, the only *perfect* (Matt 5:47-8) way to eradicate the
COVID-19 virus, thereby saving lives, in the UK & elsewhere is by
rapidly ( http://bit.ly/RapidTestCOVID-19 ) finding out at any given
moment, including even while on-line, who among us are unwittingly
contagious (i.e pre-symptomatic or asymptomatic) in order to
http://WDJW.great-site.net/ConvinceItForward (John 15:12) for them to
call their doctor and self-quarantine per their doctor in hopes of
stopping this pandemic. Thus, we're hoping for the best while
preparing for the worse-case scenario of the Alpha lineage mutations
and others like the Omicron, Gamma, Beta, Epsilon, Iota, Lambda, Mu &
Delta lineage mutations combining via slip-RNA-replication to form
hybrids like http://tinyurl.com/Deltamicron that may render current
COVID vaccines/monoclonals/medicines/pills no longer effective.
Indeed, I am wonderfully hungry ( http://tinyurl.com/RapidOmicronTest
) and hope you, Michael, also have a healthy appetite too.
So how are you ?
I am wonderfully hungry!
The REAL Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe wrote:
On Mon, 20 Mar 2023 06:12:08 -0700, NOT Michael EjercitoNithing, it is immoral for you to call anyone a gook.
<MEjercit@HotMail.com> wrote:
REAL NEMO wrote:
On Mon, 20 Mar 2023 04:47:05 -0700, NOT Michael EjercitoInstead of addressing the merits of the article, you call me a gook.
<MEjercit@HotMail.com> wrote:
https://reason.com/2023/03/20/britains-lockdown-files-reveal-the-sordid-thinking-behind-pandemic-policy/
Eye-opening insights into the messy motivations behind restrictive
COVID-19 responses.
How can this have ANY possible relevance to an illegal Flip infesting
Long Beach, gook?
Instead of addressing the relevance of the article to a gook like you,
you bitch about being called a gook.
Mangina, this is immoral.
Gook, your denying being a gook is what's immoral.
You are a nithing- homo sapiens by birth, subhuman BY CHOICE. The
You are a Nazi.
As a Nazi, you are, above all else
Yup.
Indeed.
Right on, all counts.
I sure, am.
No doubt, about it.
You got, THAT right!
YOU, on the other hand, are WAAAAAAAAAAY below all else!
key word is CHOICE. You were born with the same human nature as the
rest of us. Your CHOICES made you a nithing.
Bill explains what nithings are.
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Subject: The LORD says "Blessed are you who hunger now ..."
Shame on andrew, look at his red face.
He is trying to pull a fast one. His scripture bit is found among these:
'14 Bible verses about Spiritual Hunger'
Psalms
81:10 I am the LORD thy God, which brought thee out of the land of Egypt: >open thy mouth wide, and I will fill it.
Proverbs
13:25 The righteous has enough to satisfy his appetite, But the stomach of >the wicked is in need.
Joel
2:26 And ye shall eat in plenty, and be satisfied, and praise the name of
the LORD your God, that hath dealt wondrously with you: and my
people shall never be ashamed.
Psalms
107 For he satisfies the thirsty and fills the hungry with good things.
Acts
14:17 "Yet he did not leave himself without witness, for he did good by >giving you rains from heaven and fruitful seasons, satisfying
your hearts with food and gladness."
someone eternally condemned & ever more cursed by GOD perseverated:
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Subject: a very very very simple definition of sin ...
Does andrew's "definition" agree with scripture? Let's see in 1 John:
John wrote this to christians. The greek grammer (sic) speaks of an ongoing >> status. He includes himself in that status.
1:8 If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is
not in us.
1:9 If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, >> and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.
1:10 If we say that we have not sinned, we make him a liar, and his word is >> not in us.
On Tue, 21 Mar 2023 06:21:53 -0700, NOT Michael Ejercito <MEjercit@HotMail.com> wrote:There is nothing needledicked about me!
The REAL Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe wrote:
On Mon, 20 Mar 2023 06:12:08 -0700, NOT Michael EjercitoNithing, it is immoral for you to call anyone a gook.
<MEjercit@HotMail.com> wrote:
Instead of addressing the merits of the article, you call me a gook. >>>Instead of addressing the relevance of the article to a gook like you,
you bitch about being called a gook.
Mangina, this is immoral.
Gook, your denying being a gook is what's immoral.
Needledick, it is immoral for any gook to deny being a gook.
You are a nithing- homo sapiens by birth, subhuman BY CHOICE. The
You are a Nazi.
As a Nazi, you are, above all else
Yup.
Indeed.
Right on, all counts.
I sure, am.
No doubt, about it.
You got, THAT right!
YOU, on the other hand, are WAAAAAAAAAAY below all else!
key word is CHOICE. You were born with the same human nature as the
rest of us. Your CHOICES made you a nithing.
You are a gook - subhuman by excretion, ainlungual BY CHOICE. The key
word is CHOICE. You were excreted with the same subhuman DNA as the
rest of the gooks. Your CHOICES made you an ainlunguist.
Bill explains what nithings are.
Greek Bill and greek you, gook!
The REAL Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe wrote:
On Tue, 21 Mar 2023 06:21:53 -0700, NOT Michael EjercitoThere is nothing needledicked about me!
<MEjercit@HotMail.com> wrote:
The REAL Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe wrote:
On Mon, 20 Mar 2023 06:12:08 -0700, NOT Michael EjercitoNithing, it is immoral for you to call anyone a gook.
<MEjercit@HotMail.com> wrote:
Instead of addressing the merits of the article, you call me a gook. >>>>Instead of addressing the relevance of the article to a gook like you, >>>> you bitch about being called a gook.
Mangina, this is immoral.
Gook, your denying being a gook is what's immoral.
Needledick, it is immoral for any gook to deny being a gook.
Bill so totally dominated you and humiliated you, you wack-ass buster!
You are a nithing- homo sapiens by birth, subhuman BY CHOICE. The
You are a Nazi.
As a Nazi, you are, above all else
Yup.
Indeed.
Right on, all counts.
I sure, am.
No doubt, about it.
You got, THAT right!
YOU, on the other hand, are WAAAAAAAAAAY below all else!
key word is CHOICE. You were born with the same human nature as the
rest of us. Your CHOICES made you a nithing.
You are a gook - subhuman by excretion, ainlungual BY CHOICE. The key
word is CHOICE. You were excreted with the same subhuman DNA as the
rest of the gooks. Your CHOICES made you an ainlunguist.
Bill explains what nithings are.
Greek Bill and greek you, gook!
The following article explains your pathology.
http://archive.boston.com/bostonglobe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2009/03/11/historys_oldest_hatred/
History's oldest hatred
By Jeff Jacoby
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Subject: The LORD says "Blessed are you who hunger now ..."
Shame on andrew, look at his red face.
He is trying to pull a fast one. His scripture bit is found among these:
'14 Bible verses about Spiritual Hunger'
Psalms
81:10 I am the LORD thy God, which brought thee out of the land of Egypt: >open thy mouth wide, and I will fill it.
Proverbs
13:25 The righteous has enough to satisfy his appetite, But the stomach of >the wicked is in need.
Joel
2:26 And ye shall eat in plenty, and be satisfied, and praise the name of
the LORD your God, that hath dealt wondrously with you: and my
people shall never be ashamed.
Psalms
107 For he satisfies the thirsty and fills the hungry with good things.
Acts
14:17 "Yet he did not leave himself without witness, for he did good by >giving you rains from heaven and fruitful seasons, satisfying
your hearts with food and gladness."
someone eternally condemned & ever more cursed by GOD perseverated:
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Subject: a very very very simple definition of sin ...
Does andrew's "definition" agree with scripture? Let's see in 1 John:
John wrote this to christians. The greek grammer (sic) speaks of an ongoing >> status. He includes himself in that status.
1:8 If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is
not in us.
1:9 If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, >> and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.
1:10 If we say that we have not sinned, we make him a liar, and his word is >> not in us.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 302 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 121:59:01 |
| Calls: | 6,769 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 12,299 |
| Messages: | 5,376,788 |
| Posted today: | 2 |